╌>

Biden CDC Director Touts Vaccinating All Children While Still Enforcing Masks In Schools

  
Via:  XXJefferson51  •  4 years ago  •  85 comments

By:   Clayton Keirns

Biden CDC Director Touts Vaccinating All Children While Still Enforcing Masks In Schools
The Democrats often say to “trust the science”. However, even though the “science” doesn’t say that children are in the high-risk category of Covid, the left wants to force vaccinations on them anyways. However, even if they end up inoculating the vast majority of children, they still want to force them to wear masks at school. 8 hours per day, 5 days per week. Absolute insanity.

Leave a comment to auto-join group Americana

Americana

Big government knows no bounds.  The China virus is a government tool to control we the people and make sure that a return to pre China virus normal never happens.  Now they want to gag our kids in face diapers forever more.  Too bad some are so intellectually challenged that they take the word forever literally in an op Ed headline because they wanted to censor the content anyway.  Let’s go Brandon!  


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


WATCH: Biden CDC Director Touts Vaccinating All Children While Still Enforcing Masks In Schools



by Clayton Keirns about 4 hours agoupdated about 3 hours ago



rsz_1screen_shot_2021-10-20_at_100821_am-758x475.jpg



The Democrats often say to “trust the science”. However, even though the “science” doesn’t say that children are in the high-risk category of Covid, the left wants to force vaccinations on them anyways.

However, even if they end up inoculating the vast majority of children, they still want to force them to wear masks at school. 8 hours per day, 5 days per week. Absolute insanity.

“After we have authorization from the FDA and recommendations from the CDC, we will be working to scale up pediatric vaccination. And it will take some time, and as I just noted, as we head into the winter months we know we cannot be complacent. So for now we are going to continue to recommend masks in all schools and for all people in those schools” she said.

Watch below:






yDNLhX4Y_x96.jpg






RNC Research




@RNCResearch







WATCH: Biden’s CDC Director Rochelle Walensky says all kids should be forced to wear masks in school even if they’re vaccinated.




Furthermore, it appears that the push to vaccinate children is going to heat up faster than ever before. Biden’s Covid Response Coordinator has said that they have purchased enough supply to vaccinate ALL children ages 5-11. Brace for impact.

Watch:

These authoritarians will do everything they can to take control of our children. Don’t let them.


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
1  seeder  XXJefferson51    4 years ago

07-trick-or-trick-dt-1080-390x220.jpg

A.F. Branco October 19, 2021
0

A.F. Branco Cartoon – Nightmare on Penn. Ave

It’s a scary Halloween this year 2021 with Bide’s vaccine mandate also pointed toward children. Cartoon by A.F. Branco ©2021.…

Read More »
 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
1.1  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  XXJefferson51 @1    4 years ago

Biden CDC Director Touts Vaccinating All Children While Still Enforcing Masks In Schools

by Clayton Keirns updated  25 minutes ago

rsz_1screen_shot_2021-10-20_at_100821_am-758x475.jpg The Democrats often say to “trust the science”. However, even though the “science” doesn’t say that children are in the high-risk category of Covid, the left wants to force vaccinations on them anyways.

However, even if they end up inoculating the vast majority of children, they still want to force them to wear masks at school. 8 hours per day, 5 days per week. Absolute insanity.

“After we have authorization from the FDA and recommendations from the CDC, we will be working to scale up pediatric vaccination. And it will take some time, and as I just noted, as we head into the winter months we know we cannot be complacent. So for now we are going to continue to recommend masks in all schools and for all people in those schools” she said.

Furthermore, it appears that the push to vaccinate children is going to heat up faster than ever before. Biden’s Covid Response Coordinator has said that they have purchased enough supply to vaccinate ALL children ages 5-11. Brace for impact.

….

These authoritarians will do everything they can to take control of our children. Don’t let them.

read more:

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
1.2  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  XXJefferson51 @1    4 years ago

What a terrible choice Biden is giving our little girls!  

 
 
 
Gordy327
Professor Guide
2  Gordy327    4 years ago

Where does it say the Director wants kids to "wear a mask forever?" The headline is a lie. Which says something about those who peddle and perpetuate that lie.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.1  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Gordy327 @2    4 years ago

The Democrats often say to “trust the science”. However, even though the “science” doesn’t say that children are in the high-risk category of Covid, the left wants to force vaccinations on them anyways.

However, even if they end up inoculating the vast majority of children, they still want to force them to wear masks at school. 8 hours per day, 5 days per week. Absolute insanity.

It’s true.  From the perspective of these kids it might as well be forever.  Especially since Biden is spreading covid to our schools by deliberately resettling covid positive illegals in our communities and in our schools.  The ne’er ending pandemic. 

 
 
 
Gordy327
Professor Guide
2.1.1  Gordy327  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1    4 years ago

There is no mention of perspective. Neither is that relevant. The title's claim is simply a lie. No amount of twisting or attempted rationalization changes that. 

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.1.2  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Gordy327 @2.1.1    4 years ago

It’s an op-Ed about an issue in the news.  The opinion is justified.  

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.1.3  devangelical  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1.2    4 years ago

it's a near perfect example of the critical thinking skills available to those that would believe it.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
2.2  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Gordy327 @2    4 years ago
Where does it say the Director wants kids to "wear a mask forever?"

Try reading the seeded content.  [deleted]

The headline is a lie. Which says something about those who peddle and perpetuate that lie.

Once again, a leftist spouting off about manufactured crap.  

 
 
 
Gordy327
Professor Guide
2.2.1  Gordy327  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @2.2    4 years ago

Yes, I did read it. Nowhere did it say the Director wants kids to "wear masks forever." Only the it's recommended kids wear masks in schools. Big difference and still a lie!

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.2.2  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @2.2    4 years ago

It worked in getting the truth about what Biden is deliberately doing to us with his immigration policy and covid super spreading locked.  

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
2.2.3  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Gordy327 @2.2.1    4 years ago
Yes, I did read it.

Apparently not close enough.

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
2.2.4  Hallux  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @2.2    4 years ago

Gordy is correct, you are wrong. The seeder even admits to it being clickbait.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
2.2.5  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.2.2    4 years ago

Of course it's locked.  Doesn't Kim Jong-Uns people do the same thing for "Dear Leader"?  Hide anything that makes the incompetent look bad?

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
2.2.6  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Hallux @2.2.4    4 years ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
2.2.7  Hallux  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @2.2.6    4 years ago

Why don't you just post a quote proving us wrong ... ?

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
2.2.8  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Hallux @2.2.7    4 years ago

 
 
 
Gordy327
Professor Guide
2.2.9  Gordy327  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @2.2.8    4 years ago

In other words, you can't prove us wrong! Got it!

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
2.2.10  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Gordy327 @2.2.9    4 years ago

Oh FFS it's the headline of the article..  

You ask for where it said it, I provided it.  The seeder provided it.  But you want to play putt putt games.  Pull your head from your 4th point of contact already.

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
2.2.11  Hallux  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @2.2.10    4 years ago

... and the headline is an outright lie!

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.2.12  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Hallux @2.2.4    4 years ago

I never said any such thing.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.2.13  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @2.2.5    4 years ago

Pretty much!  All I have to say is:  Let’s go Brandon!  And his voters too.  

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.2.14  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Hallux @2.2.11    4 years ago

No, it’s not.  It’s wrong to call the expression of personal opinion a lie or misleading. 

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.2.15  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @2.2.10    4 years ago

And I stand by the headline of my original article. There is no projected end date for masks at school even if everyone there is vaccinated so it might as well be masked forever.  

 
 
 
Gordy327
Professor Guide
2.2.16  Gordy327  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.2.14    4 years ago
It’s wrong to call the expression of personal opinion a lie or misleading. 

The opinion is a lie because it's not an actual opinion, but an unsupported claim. If it's not true, then it's a lie!

And I stand by the headline of my original article.

Then you stand by a lie, plain and simple.

There is no projected end date for masks at school even if everyone there is vaccinated so it might as well be masked forever.  

That's just an illogical leap or assumption. But no one is saying it's going to be forever. SO such claims to that effect are indeed lies!

 
 
 
Gordy327
Professor Guide
2.2.17  Gordy327  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @2.2.10    4 years ago

There is nothing in the article that supports the claim the headline is making. So it's misleading at best and a flat out lie at worst! Hello! jrSmiley_123_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.2.18  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Gordy327 @2.2.1    4 years ago

Really?  Then name the date of expiration of the mask recommendation for school kids and staff?  Indefinite may as well be forever.  

 
 
 
Gordy327
Professor Guide
2.2.19  Gordy327  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.2.18    4 years ago

Indefinite is merely your assumption. 

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.2.20  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Gordy327 @2.2.17    4 years ago

It’s forever until they post a date certain of it ending.  I will not back down on the legitimacy of using the word forever in an op Ed headline and ending the discussion under that headline was nothing more than the raw censorship of an opposing opinion on the covid issue.  

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.2.21  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Gordy327 @2.2.19    4 years ago

It is indefinite until there is an actual posted end date.  Period.  To the youngsters impacted it may as well be forever.  

 
 
 
Gordy327
Professor Guide
2.2.22  Gordy327  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.2.20    4 years ago
It’s forever until they post a date certain of it ending.

No, that's still just your own assumption. Or paranoia!

  I will not back down on the legitimacy of using the word forever in an op Ed headline and ending the discussion under that headline was nothing more than the raw censorship of an opposing opinion on the covid issue.  

Then you will remain wrong and in support of a lie, that's all.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
2.2.23  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Hallux @2.2.11    4 years ago

So instead of throwing a fit like a 2 year old, take it up with the publisher and author.  

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
2.2.24  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.2.15    4 years ago
There is no projected end date for masks

And some can't understand how that correlates with the headline.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
2.2.25  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Gordy327 @2.2.17    4 years ago

Then I suggest reading it again.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
2.2.29  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Tessylo @2.2.26    4 years ago

Dude, WTF are you talking about?

 
 
 
Gordy327
Professor Guide
2.2.30  Gordy327  replied to  Tessylo @2.2.27    4 years ago

To answer your question, I'm going to say never.

 
 
 
Gordy327
Professor Guide
2.2.31  Gordy327  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @2.2.25    4 years ago

It doesn't matter how many times it's read, there is nothing that says kids are wearing masks forever. Such claims are mere (and possibly paranoid) assumptions at best. Especially since it's only "recommended."

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
2.2.32  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Gordy327 @2.2.31    4 years ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
Gordy327
Professor Guide
2.2.33  Gordy327  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @2.2.32    4 years ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
Gordy327
Professor Guide
2.2.35  Gordy327  replied to  Tessylo @2.2.34    4 years ago

Yes, I've noticed.

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
2.3  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Gordy327 @2    4 years ago
The headline is a lie.

So is the content...

"Speaking during a Wuhan coronavirus press briefing"

There is no such thing as a "Wuhan coronavirus press briefing". The CDC director spoke during a "

The halfwit author ignorantly throws in "Wuhan" multiple times because it's just what the dumb shit readers of Townhall want to hear as she lies to them about the CDC director wanting to mask their kids "forever".

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
2.3.1  Greg Jones  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @2.3    4 years ago

Whatever, but it's still the "WUHAN"  virus

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Principal
2.3.2  Gsquared  replied to  Greg Jones @2.3.1    4 years ago

And it's still the "TRUMP" pandemic.

 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Participates
2.3.3  1stwarrior  replied to  Gsquared @2.3.2    4 years ago

Of course, you can "PROVE" that, right?

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.3.4  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Greg Jones @2.3.1    4 years ago

The China virus!  

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.3.5  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @2.3    4 years ago

It was a freaking op Ed expressing the opinion of the author Katie Pavlich and her site, Town Hall.  It takes some real contortion to hold an op Ed which is the authors opinion and not hard news to the same standards.  Almost Anyone could see that the word forever was hyperbole and never to be taken literally.  

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.3.6  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @2.3    4 years ago
The headline is a lie.
So is the content...

I had no idea i seeded a hard news article…Not!  Actually I knew it was an authors opinion piece.  Some opinions were not allowed as expressed.  

"Speaking during a Wuhan coronavirus press briefing"

There is no such thing as a "Wuhan coronavirus press briefing".

Really? The China virus didn’t originate in a lab at Wuhan?  I think that it did.  

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.3.8  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Tessylo @2.3.7    4 years ago

It is the wuhan virus.  That is where it originated.  We will call it the China virus til the end of time.  Trump was right to call out China, the CCP, and Winnie the Pooh chairman Xi for their actions regarding it.  

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.4  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Gordy327 @2    4 years ago

Forever was hyperbole for indefinite and was nothing more than a figure of speech.  There was no lie intended.  This no lie at all.  The word forever here was nothing more than a pretext for censorship and you got your way.  Congratulations!  

 
 
 
Gordy327
Professor Guide
2.4.1  Gordy327  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.4    4 years ago
Forever was hyperbole

The hyperbole here is that comment.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.4.2  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Gordy327 @2.4.1    4 years ago

I don’t care that that is your viewpoint of my position on this issue.  Forever! 

 
 
 
Gordy327
Professor Guide
2.4.3  Gordy327  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.4.2    4 years ago
I don’t care that that is your viewpoint of my position on this issue.  Forever! 

Your feelings are irrelevant and hardly of any concern. It doesn't change that you posted, support, and perpetuate a blatant lie. And then try to rationalize it. You're fooling no one. Except yourself!

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.4.4  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Gordy327 @2.4.3    4 years ago

As are your feelings, beliefs, and ideas to me. 
There was no lie.  It was an opinion piece.  She was expressing her viewpoint and I not only stand by her points but double down on them.  That her opinion was censored made it all the more valuable and I’m glad I seeded it as I did and will take the contrary position on virtually every covid issue from what is popular here.  Way to speak truth to power Katie Pavlich!  I salute you! 

 
 
 
Gordy327
Professor Guide
2.4.5  Gordy327  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.4.4    4 years ago
As are your feelings, beliefs, and ideas to me. 

See, unlike you, I generally do not go be feelings or beliefs.

There was no lie.

I guess that's why you had to change the headline!

 It was an opinion piece.  She was expressing her viewpoint and I not only stand by her points but double down on them.

That makes you both wrong then. Doubly so too!

That her opinion was censored

No, it was exposed as a lie!

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.4.6  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Gordy327 @2.4.5    4 years ago
See, unlike you, I generally do not go be feelings or beliefs.

You do but you label them as reason and logic to try to carry on a feeling of intellectual superiority that is not real.  

I guess that's why you had to change the headline!

I was coerced into doing so.  I never renounced the original headline and still stand by it.  I seeded the article and headline censored here elsewhere and there was no problem there as they were smart enough to not take hyperbole in an editorial headline literally.  

That makes you both wrong then. Doubly so too!

No we are not.  There is no metric or deadline as to when masks will be repealed for school kids and staff even if all are vaccinated.  This has been all over conservative media as stated.  Forever is accurate until there is a date certain end date.  

No, it was exposed as a lie!

It was not, actually.  You simply found an excuse to get an opinion you didn’t like censored here.  Nothing more.  It is the truth and I stand by it double down on it and make no apologies whatsoever for seeding it.  I’m actually proud that I did.  

 
 
 
Gordy327
Professor Guide
2.4.7  Gordy327  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.4.6    4 years ago
You do but you label them as reason and logic to try to carry on a feeling of intellectual superiority that is not real.  

You are imagining things. I go by evidence or what can be empirically demonstrated.

No we are not.  

Keep telling yourself that if it makes you feel better. Still fooling noone!

It was not, actually.

Actually, it is! The claim was made with no supporting evidence or information. Just emotional based assumption.

You simply found an excuse to get an opinion you didn’t like censored here.  Nothing more.  It is the truth and I stand by it double down on it and make no apologies whatsoever for seeding it.

And you simply continue to play the victim. Whining is so childish!

 I’m actually proud that I did.  

Yes, I acknowledge you're proud of lying, or at least supporting lies! You do it regularly.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.4.8  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Gordy327 @2.4.7    4 years ago
You are imagining things. I go by evidence or what can be empirically demonstrated.


I imagined nothing.  You can keep believing that.  I do not.  

Keep telling yourself that if it makes you feel better. Still fooling noone!

The truth always makes me feel better.  Unlike the secular left, I have no need or reason to try to fool anyone.  

Actually, it is! The claim was made with no supporting evidence or information. Just emotional based assumption.

claim?  It was an editorial opinion.  One she’s entitled to express and I’m proud that I repeated it here.  Being censored was a badge of honor and I take pride in it.  Since there is no end date for the kids to be in face diapers, forever was a perfect term and I stand by it. 

And you simply continue to play the victim. Whining is so childish!

Im no victim and never said I was.  Free speech and the 1st amendment on the other hand were.  

Yes, I acknowledge you're proud of lying, or at least supporting lies! You do it regularly.

There were no lies.  I was not supporting any lie.  I’m more proud now than ever that I seeded her article. The rest of what you say is nothing more than a personal attack.  

 
 
 
Gordy327
Professor Guide
2.4.9  Gordy327  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.4.8    4 years ago
I imagined nothing.

Then your statement is wrong!

The truth always makes me feel better.  Unlike the secular left, I have no need or reason to try to fool anyone.  

Your idea of "truth" doesn't make it truth.

claim?  It was an editorial opinion.

It was put forth as a claim and is still a lie either way.

Im no victim and never said I was.

Then stop acting like one.

There were no lies.  I was not supporting any lie.

Demonstrably false!

The rest of what you say is nothing more than a personal attack.  

And you're just grasping at straws. It was explained why it was a lie. The fact that you had to change the headline because it was misleading (as Perrie noted in her post #3) proves it.

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
Professor Expert
3  Perrie Halpern R.A.    4 years ago

This article is closed due to inaccurate/ misleading headline. 

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3.1  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @3    4 years ago

I changed the headline, source, and title from Katie Pavlich’s Town Hall op Ed piece to the one from Trending Politics I also used here in seed 1.1.  

 
 
 
Gordy327
Professor Guide
3.1.1  Gordy327  replied to  XXJefferson51 @3.1    4 years ago
I changed the headline,

Good. Now you're being more honest.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3.1.2  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Gordy327 @3.1.1    4 years ago

I didn’t choose the article headline.  I stand by it though.  

Forever Forever Forever Forever Forever 
Forever Forever Forever Forever Forever Forever Forever Forever Forever Forever Forever Forever

 
 
 
Gordy327
Professor Guide
3.1.3  Gordy327  replied to  XXJefferson51 @3.1.2    4 years ago

So you support lies. But I already knew that.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3.1.4  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Gordy327 @3.1.3    4 years ago

I support the ability of a Fox News contributor who also writes for Town Hall to be able to fully express their personal opinion on a given topic without suffering from big tech social media censorship.  

 
 
 
Gordy327
Professor Guide
3.1.5  Gordy327  replied to  XXJefferson51 @3.1.4    4 years ago

They can write what they want. But that doesn't exempt them or what they write from scrutiny or criticism, especially when it's a lie!

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3.1.6  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Gordy327 @3.1.5    4 years ago

Criticism and scrutiny are fine.  They are part of a free speech discussion about ones opinion on a given issue.  Erasing the issue from discussion is none of that.  I understand that my views on reopening, public gatherings for non liberal reasons, mandates for masks and for vaccines, and rights/freedom vs government edicts are not popular with the powers that be here. 

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
3.1.7  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  XXJefferson51 @3.1.6    4 years ago
are not popular with the powers that be here

What "powers that be here"? There are mostly just other Americans who are simply countering the misinformation that you regularly link that you constantly pretend is somehow reliable, profound and enlightening when the truth is it's nothing but shallow baseless conservative opinion. No one is silencing you, they are just calling out bullshit every time you dump another load on us.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3.1.8  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @3.1.7    4 years ago

The articles I seed here are clearly and obviously to all rational objective observers reliable, profound and enlightening and are the truth.  It is nothing but shallow baseless progressive left opinion to deny this. [Deleted]  We conservatives here are just calling out bull crap every time they dump another load on us, trying to deny the legitimacy of our honest well reasoned ideals and beliefs.  

 
 
 
Gordy327
Professor Guide
3.1.9  Gordy327  replied to  XXJefferson51 @3.1.6    4 years ago
I understand that my views on reopening, public gatherings for non liberal reasons, mandates for masks and for vaccines, and rights/freedom vs government edicts are not popular with the powers that be here. 

Probably because they are completely irrational and not everyone here is irrational.

The articles I seed here are clearly and obviously to all rational objective observers reliable, profound and enlightening and are the truth.

Only in your mind.

It is nothing but shallow baseless progressive left opinion to deny this.

And now you move on to a sweeping generalization.

We conservatives here are just calling out bull crap every time they dump another load on us, trying to deny the legitimacy of our honest well reasoned ideals and beliefs.  

Now that's bull crap. Waist deep in it too.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3.1.11  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Gordy327 @3.1.9    4 years ago

[deleted]

Only in your mind.

That’s not true.  There are other conservatives here who agree with many of my various seeds to some extent depending on the topic.  

[deleted]

[deleted]

 
 
 
Gordy327
Professor Guide
3.1.12  Gordy327  replied to  XXJefferson51 @3.1.11    4 years ago
only secular progressives assume that all who presume to dare to disagree with them are irrational.  Typical of the condescending arrogance that ideology is so well known for.  

Sweeping generalizations are also irrational.

That’s not true.  There are other conservatives here who agree with many of my various seeds to some extent depending on the topic.  

That is not a glowing endorsement.

Typical of the sheer condescending arrogance of the attitude on the secular left to deny any legitimacy to posts, seeds, views and opinions in diametric opposition to their views and opinions.  

See first statement.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
3.1.13  TᵢG  replied to  Gordy327 @3.1.12    4 years ago

There are those who can discuss / debate an issue based on facts and reason.   And then there are those whose 'contribution' is almost always whining about their stereotypes:

  • the left
  • the Ds
  • the secularists
  • the bi-coastal elites
  • the godless

... and all sorts of combinations of the above.

It is as though the world is simplistically perceived as a collection of faceless groups of 'evil' rather than as a complex network of issues, facts and reason:   "I see bi-coastal secular elites .... everywhere".

 
 
 
Gordy327
Professor Guide
3.1.14  Gordy327  replied to  TᵢG @3.1.13    4 years ago
And then there are those whose 'contribution' is almost always whining about their stereotypes:

That is putting it mildly.

It is as though the world is simplistically perceived as a collection of faceless groups of 'evil' rather than as a complex network of issues, facts and reason:

Some see things only in extremes. Like black and white. They ignore everything in the middle.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3.1.15  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Gordy327 @3.1.12    4 years ago
only secular progressives assume that all who presume to dare to disagree with them are irrational.  Typical of the condescending arrogance that ideology is so well known for.  

That’s not true.  There are other conservatives here who agree with many of my various seeds to some extent depending on the topic.  

Typical of the sheer condescending arrogance of the attitude on the secular left to deny any legitimacy to posts, seeds, views and opinions in diametric opposition to their views and opinions.  

I agree completely.  

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3.1.16  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  TᵢG @3.1.13    4 years ago
"I see bi-coastal secular elites .... everywhere".

you forgot progressive between secular and elites 

[Deleted

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3.1.17  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Tessylo @3.1.10    4 years ago

Forever!  

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3.1.19  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  TᵢG @3.1.13    4 years ago

Back on topic: 

Who's Choking Off Your Children?

3b48101db6c352bd293e56a8df02eeba04aba383.jpg?ref=relatedBox

COLORADO SPRINGS — The latest horror story involving COVID-19 control freaks erupted right here in my backyard on Friday. It's breathtaking. Literally. No responsible parent can in good conscience sit by silently while pandemic tyrants choke off our children's freedom and oxygen supply.

Stephanie M. is a work-at-home mother of three young daughters. On Friday, she received a text from her sixth grade daughter, Rylee. It was a selfie photo of the girl taken at Chinook Trail Middle School in Colorado Springs. The school is in District 20, which imposed a blanket indoor mask mandate a month ago for all preschool through 12th grade students. Rylee's face was covered not only by a black mask but also by three thick strips of blue painter's tape sealing the top of the mask over the bridge of her nose.

Rylee texted that "all teachers" in her learning pod had been toting around rolls of the painter's tape and began issuing "warnings" to students whose face coverings were deemed noncompliant. The message was clear: Shape up, tape up, or face disciplinary consequences.

Sensing danger to her child, Stephanie rushed to the school to demand answers from school officials. In a taped conversation, dean Jennifer Richardson told the mom and daughter that the policy "is not an endorsed thing" and that students had "a choice" on whether to wear the tape or not.

Richardson downplayed the blatantly coercive intimidation by authority figures by asserting that "nobody told Rylee she had to put tape on her mask." But the sixth grader said she felt she had to when she was handed the tape. Stephanie, who told me she is not a confrontational person but was pushed to the edge by Richardson's rationalizations, immediately took her daughter out of the school.

"It's wrong, and I will be telling every single news channel. And I'm taking her out," Stephanie told the dean without a moment's hesitation. "That is child abuse." An unidentified male on the audio told her he agreed and apologized as Stephanie rebuked them on the way out:

"You are supposed to take care of the children."

Stephanie told me Monday that "it was a horrible decision to implement" the mask mandate in the first place without parental input. Compounding it with an oxygen-depleting and punitive tape policy adds even greater injury to accountability insult. Another mom of a Chinook Trail middle schooler, Tori Skeldum, told local news station Fox 21 that her sixth grader had also been subjected to the tape tyranny and that her child described the teachers "wearing the masking tape around their wrists like bracelets."

If that scenario reminds you of prison guards twirling around their keys or batons, you're not alone. Middle school is the new American Gitmo.

Are your children safe from the mask abusers?….

read more:
 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
4  seeder  XXJefferson51    4 years ago

Still no end in sight for kids and face diapers.

 
 

Who is online

JBB
Bob Nelson
Greg Jones
Just Jim NC TttH
devangelical
Sparty On
Gsquared
Mark in Wyoming
Tacos!


110 visitors