╌>

Biden Bends The Knee To The Woke Mob; Says He’s “Angry” About Rittenhouse Verdict

  
Via:  XXJefferson51  •  4 years ago  •  67 comments

By:   Eric Thompson

Biden Bends The Knee To The Woke Mob; Says He’s “Angry” About Rittenhouse Verdict
officials are demanding that Biden apologizes to Rittenhouse for linking him to white supremacism following the Wisconsin jury’s not-guilty verdict. ‘Joe Biden needs to publicly apologize to Kyle Rittenhouse,’ said Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR), in a statement shortly after the verdict was announced. For many Americans, the verdict was just, and Joe’s flip-flopping from his first reaction to the administration’s version which was written for him is disturbing, divisive, but not surprising.

Leave a comment to auto-join group Americana

Americana

It seems that what’s good enough to be listed at Real Clear Politics is not good enough for here, thus the end of my prior seed.  Biden is an absolute Jack ass.  What more can be said.  It seems that it is his voters and supporters that he is on bended knee before.  Let’s go Brandon!  


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



Biden Bends The Knee To The Woke Mob; Says He’s “Angry” About Rittenhouse Verdict



by Eric Thompson about 4 hours ago


After a few painstakingly long days, the Kyle Rittenhouse jury came up with their unanimous verdict; not guilty on all 5 counts.

Shortly after the verdict was announced, Biden told reporters Friday afternoon that he stood by the jury.

Biden said ‘just heard a moment ago’ about the verdict, and that he ‘didn’t watch the trial, which featured clashes between the prosecution and defense lawyers and testimony by the accused teen in an event that got gavel-to-gavel cable news coverage.

‘I stand by with the jury as the jury system has concluded. The jury system works and you have to abide by it,’

A short time later though, the White House released a written statement for Biden on the Rittenhouse case, this time with a social justice bent to it.

“While the verdict in Kenosha will leave many Americans feeling angry and concerned, myself included, we must acknowledge that the jury has spoken. I ran on a promise to bring Americans together because I believe that what unites us is far greater than what divides us. I know that we’re not going to heal our country’s wounds overnight, but I remain steadfast in my commitment to do everything in my power to ensure that every American is treated equally, with fairness and dignity, under the law.”

“I urge everyone to express their views peacefully, consistent with the rule of law. Violence and destruction of property have no place in our democracy. The White House and federal authorities have been in contact with Governor [Tony] Evers ’ office to prepare for any outcome in this case, and I have spoken with the governor this afternoon and offered support and any assistance needed to ensure public safety.”

Read the full statement here:


Republican lawmakers and other officials are demanding that Biden apologizes to Rittenhouse for linking him to white supremacism following the Wisconsin jury’s not-guilty verdict.

‘Joe Biden needs to publicly apologize to Kyle Rittenhouse,’ said Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR), in a statement shortly after the verdict was announced.

For many Americans, the verdict was just, and Joe’s flip-flopping from his first reaction to the administration’s version which was written for him is disturbing, divisive, but not surprising.


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
1  seeder  XXJefferson51    4 years ago
…The persecution of Kyle Rittenhouse continues. Even after a jury of his peers found the 18-year-old “not guilty” on all five counts in his high profile case, Democrat leaders are calling on the Department of Justice to intervene in the Rittenhouse case on “civil rights” grounds.

House Judiciary Committee Chair Rep. Jerry Nadler called on the DOJ to review the Kyle Rittenhouse case for possible federal charges.

“This heartbreaking verdict is a miscarriage of justice and sets a dangerous precedent which justifies federal review by DOJ,” Rep. Nadler tweeted. “Justice cannot tolerate armed persons crossing state lines looking for trouble while people engage in First Amendment-protected protest.”

Biden earlier issued a statement indicating that he was “angry and concerned” about the not guilty verdict, but urged people to “express their views peacefully”:

“While the verdict in Kenosha will leave many Americans feeling angry and concerned, myself included, we must acknowledge that the jury has spoken. I ran on a promise to bring Americans together because I believe that what unites us is far greater than what divides us. I know that we’re not going to heal our country’s wounds overnight, but I remain steadfast in my commitment to do everything in my power to ensure that every American is treated equally, with fairness and dignity, under the law.”

“I urge everyone to express their views peacefully, consistent with the rule of law. Violence and destruction of property have no place in our democracy. The White House and federal authorities have been in contact with Governor [Tony] Evers’ office to prepare for any outcome in this case, and I have spoken with the governor this afternoon and offered support and any assistance needed to ensure public safety.”

The unpresidential statement is sending mixed messages to Americans and to the radical mob gathered in Kenosha, Wisconsin ready to riot at a moment’s notice. Vice President Kamala Harris’s statement was even more incendiary:

“The verdict really speaks for itself,” Harris said. “As many of you know, I spent a majority of my career working to make the justice system more equitable, and clearly there is a lot more work to do.”

Kamala Harris actually spent her time as California District Attorney locking people up for victimless crimes that she herself had committed.

Not to be outdone, Rep. Ayanna Pressley (D-MA) earlieer called Rittenhouse a “white supremacist domestic terrorist.”

Screenshot-11_19_2021-6_02_04-PM.jpg

As concerned parents recently learned, the Department of Justice under Attorney General Merrick Garland isn’t afraid to label Americans “domestic terrorists” for purposes of investigation and harrassment. Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) also called Rittenhouse a “domestic terrorist.”…

read more:  

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
1.1  Ronin2  replied to  XXJefferson51 @1    4 years ago

Democrats are really trying hard to be at the top of the list for slander lawsuits. It is almost like they are vying to see who is going to get sued first.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
1.1.1  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Ronin2 @1.1    4 years ago

I can’t wait to see so many elements of the evil secular progressive bi coastal urban elites getting their butts sued off for this.  The irony that the verdict happened on the day MSNBC was banned from the court room was poetic Justice.  

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.1.2  JohnRussell  replied to  XXJefferson51 @1.1.1    4 years ago

Two of the victims families have already suggested they will take Rittenhouse to civil court where the standard of guilt is considerably less. 

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
1.1.3  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  JohnRussell @1.1.2    4 years ago

You talking about the relatives of the child molester or the wife beater, or the one who admitted to pulling a gun on him and advancing toward Rittenhouse before being shot?  

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
1.1.4  Ronin2  replied to  JohnRussell @1.1.2    4 years ago

They will have an uphill battle as they will have to prove their mighty mental midget criminal family members didn't intend to kill Rittenhouse.

Will love to see the family of the convicted pedophile try that while explaining away the countless verbal threats he made to Rittenhouse and others. Right behind him are the serial domestic abuser; and the moronic medic that lost his concealed weapons permit for handling his weapon while being drunk. I am sure he is eager to bring up the fact he pointed a gun he wasn't supposed to have at Rittenhouse's head. He should be facing charges himself; except for the inept prosecutor that wouldn't know a real criminal if he saw one.

The left truly love their criminals; especially the incestuous pedophile they put in the White House.

Let's go Brandon!

 
 
 
Gazoo
Junior Silent
1.1.5  Gazoo  replied to  Ronin2 @1.1.4    4 years ago

“The left truly love their criminals; especially the incestuous pedophile they put in the White House.

Let's go Brandon!”

jrSmiley_13_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
1.1.7  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Gazoo @1.1.5    4 years ago

Joe Biden Panders to Social Justice Warriors Re: Rittenhouse Verdict

5utzvu.jpg
 
 
 
zuksam
Junior Silent
1.1.8  zuksam  replied to  JohnRussell @1.1.2    4 years ago
Two of the victims families have already suggested they will take Rittenhouse to civil court where the standard of guilt is considerably less. 

I doubt they will because they'll have a tough time finding a Free Lawyer for such a long shot case so they'll have to pay. They'll face the same videos, witness testimony, and the criminal verdict will be known. What are the chances that at least one of the Civil Jurors won't see it the same way this Jury saw it ?

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
1.1.9  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  zuksam @1.1.8    4 years ago

They have no real chance at getting anything in a civil court.  If anything it will be Rittenhouse trying to go after those that slandered or defamed him in the media.  

 
 
 
Nowhere Man
Junior Participates
1.1.10  Nowhere Man  replied to  zuksam @1.1.8    4 years ago
What are the chances that at least one of the Civil Jurors won't see it the same way this Jury saw it ?

The thing is they don't need a unanimous jury in a civil trial, they only need 2/3rds and in some cases only 1 more than half.... The standard of proof also changes from beyond a reasonable doubt to preponderance of evidence.... A much much lower standard.. With enough jurors that think he got away with something they could win some money..

Of course if there is legal ground to bring the case as a wrongful death which by black letter law cannot exist where the deceased was involved in criminal activities... Assault is a criminal activity last time I checked and the video clearly establishes the criminality of what the deceased persons were doing....

Or negligent homicide which is an authority which had responsibility to see no one gets hurt can be proven to have abdicated that responsibility knowing that there was a high possibility of the deceased becoming deceased.... In that case they would have to argue that the local government's order for the police to stand down led to the foreseeable possibility that someone in defense of themselves would kill someone...

Either way KR is in the clear, the self defense justifiable homicide decision by the jury severely limits the avenues they can legally go after him as a matter of law...

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
1.1.11  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Nowhere Man @1.1.10    4 years ago

I think the liberals are thinking about how OJ’s victims families went after him in civil court though I agree with you that the situation is so different that there’s little prospect of success for the left to use that tool for political revenge.  

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
1.2  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  XXJefferson51 @1    4 years ago

Judge Schroeder

Michael Ramirez Nov 18, 2021 Cartoons  

mr680_211118.jpg
 
 
 
Drakkonis
Professor Guide
1.2.2  Drakkonis  replied to  XXJefferson51 @1.2    4 years ago

Now that's funny!!!

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.3  Vic Eldred  replied to  XXJefferson51 @1    4 years ago

Biden smeared him twice.

 
 
 
zuksam
Junior Silent
1.3.1  zuksam  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.3    4 years ago

The next time Rittenhouse does an interview he should have the host ask him about Biden's smears and he should reply "Let's go Brandon".

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
1.3.2  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  zuksam @1.3.1    4 years ago

lol! jrSmiley_86_smiley_image.gif  

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
1.3.3  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.3    4 years ago

True but any court action filed against him can’t begin until he’s left the Presidency.  And that is as it should be.  

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.3.4  Vic Eldred  replied to  zuksam @1.3.1    4 years ago

Better still, Rittenhouse should avoid interviews and concentrate on defamation suits against Biden and the media.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
1.3.5  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.3.4    4 years ago

I agree.  I think both are possible though.  I think Tucker may interview him tomorrow or has and it airs tomorrow.  

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
1.3.6  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  XXJefferson51 @1.3.5    4 years ago

It’s official. I saw the promos for Tucker’s interview with Rittenhouse tomorrow at his usual time.  

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2  seeder  XXJefferson51    4 years ago

Let the evil regime in DC and it’s supporters stew in their shock, bitterness, and anger.  The rest of us in heartland America can celebrate that our system still works and that justice prevailed.  

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Participates
2.1  Thrawn 31  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2    4 years ago

What a faggy comment. [Deleted] I mean I get that you talk this way cuz no one knows who you are, but don’t you just feel stupid after posting that kinda shit?

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.1.1  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Thrawn 31 @2.1    4 years ago

Where I live almost everyone here thinks pretty much the same way.  There will be no protests about the verdict here.  I have no need to hide the fact that I think the jury got this 1000% right.  This is not a race issue as three white guys assaulted and stalked a white teen age boy.  

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Participates
2.1.2  Thrawn 31  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1.1    4 years ago

[Deleted]

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.1.3  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Thrawn 31 @2.1.2    4 years ago
03-Not-Guilty-CDN-1080-1-390x220.jpg
A.F. Branco November 19, 2021
0

Ready, Aim, Justice

Despite prosecutorial misconduct, Kyle Rittenhouse was found 'not guilty' on all counts. As he should have.

Read More »
 
 
 
squiggy
Junior Silent
2.1.4  squiggy  replied to  Thrawn 31 @2.1    4 years ago
I mean I get that you talk this way cuz no one knows who you are

Yea, some keyboard warriors are like that.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.1.5  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  squiggy @2.1.4    4 years ago

Indeed.  Some are.  But he was referring to me and all I said was that we should be happy that the system still works and that justice prevailed.  

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Participates
2.2  Thrawn 31  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2    4 years ago

[removed]

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.2.1  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Thrawn 31 @2.2    4 years ago

As a matter of fact, I am quite happy with the verdict and the fact that justice prevailed in this case.  

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Participates
3  Thrawn 31    4 years ago

[removed]

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3.1  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Thrawn 31 @3    4 years ago

Thanks for all of your fine compliments.  I appreciate the warm expression of what you think that I am and who my friends might be.  It makes me feel so respected to be compared to an animal.  I’m proud to be a fossil and am heartened that you would think me to be a Russian rather than a fellow American.  It brings me great sadness to find out that you are bored.  I wish you a very Merry Christmas!  

 
 
 
sixpick
Professor Quiet
3.1.1  sixpick  replied to  XXJefferson51 @3.1    4 years ago

[Deleted]

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3.1.3  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  sixpick @3.1.1    4 years ago

[Deleted]

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3.1.4  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Texan1211 @3.1.2    4 years ago

[Deleted]  

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
4  Sean Treacy    4 years ago

Figures, Biden says something Presidential and his handlers immediately make him retract it and issue the usual divisive left wing nonsense.

I'm sure the 35% of Americans who think he's doing a good job will applaud his attack on a jury. 

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
4.1  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Sean Treacy @4    4 years ago

It’s all part of their plan to find federal charges to file against him.  

Chuck Todd HOLDS BACK TEARS Over Rittenhouse Verdict; Says Child Rapist Rosenbaum Was “Victim”

by Clayton Keirns about 5 hours ago updated about 4 hours ago

The entire liberal media is melting down over the fact that Kyle Rittenhouse was found innocent of murder.

One particularly hilarious meltdown came from MSNBC’s Chuck Todd. In the moments after the verdict was announced, Todd spoke to his panel and began choking up at the fact that child rapist Joseph Rosenbaum is dead.

“I’m going to bring in David Henderson, civil rights attorney. David, if you’re the family of, of, the, the dead victims here,” he said while pausing, holding back his tears.

What’s your next….do you have another place to go? Where to Mr. Huber’s and Mr. Rosenbaum’s family go? ” Todd asked.

Watch below:

While Chuck Todd and the liberal media mourn the death of a child rapist, Tucker Carlson had a different take earlier this week.

“The trial confirmed exactly what happened, and here are the facts about it. A convicted child rapist called Joseph Rosenbaum was released from a mental hospital and then went directly to join the mob that was burning downtown Kenosha. Once he got to the riot, Rosenbaum saw Kyle Rittenhouse and immediately threatened to kill him,” Tucker explained during the monologue.

“Rosenbaum then chased Rittenhouse and tried to pull the gun from his hands. When he did that, Kyle Rittenhouse shot him. So Joseph Rosenbaum died as he had lived, trying to touch an unwilling minor,” Tucker hilariously said.

Watch below:

The left-wing media mourns child rapists while conservative media treats them like the criminals they are….

Read more:
 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Participates
4.2  Thrawn 31  replied to  Sean Treacy @4    4 years ago

You like Trump, retarded presidential statements are the norm for you. Be consistent [Deleted]

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
4.2.1  Sean Treacy  replied to  Thrawn 31 @4.2    4 years ago
You like Trump, retarded presidential statements are the norm for you. Be consistent dipshit.

Lol... I've voted for Trump as many times as you have. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
4.2.2  JohnRussell  replied to  Sean Treacy @4.2.1    4 years ago

If you were an American patriot you would denounce Trump definitively and denounce Trumpism. 

All you do is attack "wokeism". 

Saying you didnt vote for Trump doesnt mean shit. 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
4.2.3  Sean Treacy  replied to  JohnRussell @4.2.2    4 years ago
Saying you didnt vote for Trump doesnt mean shit. 

Well, I'm pretty sure it means I don't like Trump. 

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
4.2.4  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Thrawn 31 @4.2    4 years ago

[Deleted]

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
4.2.5  Ronin2  replied to  JohnRussell @4.2.2    4 years ago

You voted the current incestuous pedophile into the White House.

Where is your apology to the rest of the US for that? 

 
 
 
bbl-1
Professor Quiet
4.2.6  bbl-1  replied to  Ronin2 @4.2.5    4 years ago

I am confident John Russell did not vote for Trump or the MAGA agenda.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
4.2.7  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Ronin2 @4.2.5    4 years ago

Inquiring minds want to know!  I wont expect one though.  Brandon is every bit as bad as you said. All we will get is more “but Trump” what aboutisms and that’s about it.  

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4.3  Vic Eldred  replied to  Sean Treacy @4    4 years ago

 First, he said we’re going to respect the jury’s verdict.

Then when his advisors took over and wrote a new press statement, he told us how upset he was by the verdict. And that’s what aired on MSNBC all day.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
4.3.1  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.3    4 years ago

Let’s go Brandon!   

 
 
 
bbl-1
Professor Quiet
5  bbl-1    4 years ago

In 1914 Archduke Ferdinand was assassinated.  In the politics of the World it meant little.  However, that incident started a reaction.

Rittenhouse is acquitted.  That too means little.  And now he will become something he would never be---a guest on right wing media with all the grifting as the bonus.  

American Destiny?  Or American Decline?  Who benefits?------That would the rising autocracies, led, cultivated and financed by Xi, The Saudi Royal Family and of course Putin.  As in 1914, in 2021 the autocrats will stoke the fire to burn the democracies.  Will this 'incident' create the wave to return Trump to the WH so he can exact the revenge he so sorely needs?

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
5.1  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  bbl-1 @5    4 years ago

America’s secular progressive elites need and deserve another term with Trump as President of America First.  MAGA again 

 
 
 
bbl-1
Professor Quiet
5.1.1  bbl-1  replied to  XXJefferson51 @5.1    4 years ago

What the heck are you talking about?  JFC give the crap a rest and comment on my post.  What in the hell is wrong with you?

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
5.1.2  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  bbl-1 @5.1.1    4 years ago

America was on the rise of our global power with Trump as our President.  Any decline we suffer is due to Biden and his policies and actions.  

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Masters Expert
6  al Jizzerror    4 years ago

512

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
6.1  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  al Jizzerror @6    4 years ago

The evidence says self defense.  

 
 
 
bbl-1
Professor Quiet
6.1.1  bbl-1  replied to  XXJefferson51 @6.1    4 years ago

Don't know about the evidence, but the verdict screams---AMERICAN DESTINY.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
6.1.2  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  bbl-1 @6.1.1    4 years ago

The verdict screams that the system worked and that justice prevailed.  Both are the way America ought to be. 

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
6.2  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  al Jizzerror @6    4 years ago

Lazurus?  

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Masters Expert
7  al Jizzerror    4 years ago

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
7.1  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  al Jizzerror @7    4 years ago
The verdict can be watched below:
Here’s the livestream of the aftermath:
 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Masters Expert
9  al Jizzerror    4 years ago

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
9.1  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  al Jizzerror @9    4 years ago

Ben Shapiro Reacts To Rittenhouse Verdict; “It Is Obvious That The Jury Did The Right Thing”

On Friday, Ben Shapiro recapped the ‘not guilty’ verdict of Kyle Rittenhouse by saying it’s “obvious” that the jury did the right thing.

“Let’s talk about the verdict. So obviously not guilty on all charges. The thing that stunned me about the controversy about this is that the standard in American law is reasonable doubt. It wasn’t even that the defendant had to prove that he did this in self defense. He had to prove that there was reasonable doubt that he might have done this isn self defense,” Shapiro began while speaking to Michael Knowles.

“There is no human being with more than two neuronal firing synapses who did not know this was the case. Everybody knew that this was the case. If you had a pre frontal cortex and you watched this trial for more than 35 seconds, you knew the prosecution had nothing, you knew all of their witness were defense witnesses, you knew that all the tape backed Rittenhosue’s account,” he continued.

“It is astonishing to me that there are still members of the media that are claiming that for some larger purpose, Rittenhouse had to go to jail. Which by the way shows you where they are. Because it was never about the case. It’s never about the circumstances of the individual case. It’s always about the broader narrative that has to be pushed,” Shapiro added….

…“The fact that the jury stood up and did the right thing here is impressive. It also I think also underscores how much of a threat they were under, because to get them to ‘not guilty’, that means that somebody had to be convinced to go ‘not guilty’, in which case the entire jury had to bring logic to bear, or they knew not guilty from the outset and they were waiting and they didn’t want to be run up a flagpole for the grave misstep of somehow just saying the obvious right away. Whatever the case may be, it’s perfectly obvious that the jury did the right thing, which means of course that the media and the court of public opinion will deem that the jury did the wrong thing,” he concluded.

“I’m going to bring in David Henderson, civil rights attorney. David, if you’re the family of, of, the, the dead victims here,” he said while pausing, holding back his tears.

What’s your next….do you have another place to go? Where to Mr. Huber’s and Mr. Rosenbaum’s family go? ” Todd asked….

…The liberal media is truly the enemy of the people.

read more:
 
 
 
Steve Ott
Professor Quiet
10  Steve Ott    4 years ago

So Rittenhouse should sue Biden for libel. He should be about 25 by the time it gets to court.

There is no doubt, or there shouldn't be if you pay attention to the political landscape, that this nation is deeply divided.

I figured from the beginning he would get off, for starters, the statute under which he was charged is so vague as to make it nearly impossible to actually commit a crime.

The prosecution obviously did a poor job.

But if all your outrage is directed to what the president says about this case, you are obviously searching for outrage so you can show your virtuousness.

Instead of bitching about the other all the time, when are you going to offer positive steps toward creating a unified country, unless of course, you want no such thing.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
10.1  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Steve Ott @10    4 years ago

I do and seeded about it but I can’t promote it here.  Biden promised us unity to get elected but since taking office he’s governed only from the hard left.  He could have governed like Clinton’s middle four years where the country was United enough to truly come together post 9-11.  Recently  “getting Trump” was more important than unity vs covid to post Obama democrats 

 
 
 
Steve Ott
Professor Quiet
10.1.1  Steve Ott  replied to  XXJefferson51 @10.1    4 years ago
Biden promised us unity

It takes more than one to create unity doesn't it? I don't see the right reaching out with any ideas. Trump didn't bring unity. There is much work, from both sides, that needs to be done in order to bring some semblance of unity. Neither party is unified even within themselves.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
12  Sean Treacy    4 years ago

Biden claimed he's angry about the jury's decision, minutes after stating he didn't pay attention to the trial.

Nothing really captures Biden and the Democrats mind as concisely as that. 

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
12.1  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Sean Treacy @12    4 years ago

You are right, of course.  Biden and the democrats are confused as they try to execute their bait and switch from 2020.  

 
 

Who is online

Trout Giggles
Ed-NavDoc
Sean Treacy
Jack_TX
George


69 visitors