Rand Paul responds to Fauci’s arrogant, unbelievable statement that he IS the science

  
Via:  XXJefferson51  •  8 months ago  •  58 comments

By:   Chris Donaldson

Rand Paul responds to Fauci’s arrogant, unbelievable statement that he IS the science
The rejection of the notion that he be subjected to legitimate congressional oversight drew a swift and severe response from Senator Paul who took to Twitter to take the career bureaucrat down a peg or two. “The absolute hubris of someone claiming THEY represent science. It’s astounding and alarming that a public health bureaucrat would even think to claim such a thing, especially one who has worked so hard to ignore the science of natural immunity,” Paul wrote.

Leave a comment to auto-join group We the People

We the People

 Dr. Anthony Fauci is evil incarnate.  Lord Fauci is totally delusional in what he thinks about his power.  Now the idiot thinks that he IS science!   Lol!  This delusional control freak thinks we should surrender our liberty and freedom to him and the deep state while we know our place and sit down and shut up.  We will not. We will challenge him and question absolutely everything he says about anything and find other real experts and listen to them instead. Dr. Rand Paul was right to call him out for thinking he was somehow above oversight by the legislative branch of government.  


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



Rand Paul responds to Fauci’s arrogant, unbelievable statement that he IS the science





Staff Writer



With the scary new omicron variant laying the groundwork for a new and rapidly intensifying fear campaign, the networks trotted out Dr. Anthony Fauci on the Sunday morning shows as the nation will soon be subjected to another onslaught of panic and propaganda spearheaded by the smug career bureaucrat.

Despite Fauci’s constant flip-flopping and moving of the goalposts, he continues to be the nation’s face of COVID as President Joe Biden’s top medical adviser and, while he has taken some hits in terms of credibility, he remains the media’s go-to guy when it comes to dispensing the administration’s talking points.

The head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases appeared on CBS’s “Face The Nation” when during an interview with fawning host Margaret Brennan, he rejected criticism from Republican lawmakers including Sen. Rand Paul who has repeatedly grilled him during his appearances for testimony before the Senate by claiming that he is above reproach because anyone who dares to criticize him is attacking science.

During his chat with Brennan, Fauci scoffed at the notion that he should be subjected to legitimate congressional oversight.

“Anybody who’s looking at this carefully realizes there’s a distinct anti-science flavor to this, so if they get up and criticize science nobody’s going to know what they’re talking about,” he said, “but if they get up and they really aim their bullets at Tony Fauci well people can recognize that there’s a person there so it’s easy to criticize but they’re really criticizing science because I represent science, that’s dangerous.”

The rejection of the notion that he be subjected to legitimate congressional oversight drew a swift and severe response from Senator Paul who took to Twitter to take the career bureaucrat down a peg or two.

“The absolute hubris of someone claiming THEY represent science. It’s astounding and alarming that a public health bureaucrat would even think to claim such a thing, especially one who has worked so hard to ignore the science of natural immunity,” Paul wrote.

It isn’t the first time that Fauci has suggested that he is “the science” but he took his brazen arrogance to an entirely new level during his chat with Brennan.

In addition to wrapping himself in the science, he also trashed the two Republican senators.

“So anybody who spins lies and threatens and all that theatre that goes on with some of their investigations and the congressional committees and the Rand Pauls and all that other nonsense, that’s noise Margaret, that’s noise.” Fauci smugly declared. “I know what my job is”

Brennen then brought up Senator Ted Cruz, another who has dared to question the high priest of COVID and has called for him to be prosecuted.

Fauci diabolically snickered, then suggested that the Texas Republican is the one who should be prosecuted, inferring that Cruz was involved with the so-called “insurrection” on January 6, an event that has allowed Democrats to portray their political adversaries as terrorists and criminals.

He then answered Brennan’s softball question on whether he’s being scapegoated for Trump’s alleged failures, “Of course, you have to be asleep not to figure that one out.”

However, the CBS interview with Brennan may yet backfire on Fauci who has been able to get away with his scamming of the public at least partially on the basis of him being a kindly, grandfatherly figure. But his mocking and menacing demeanor only succeeded in showing his true colors to those who are paying attention.


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
1  seeder  XXJefferson51    8 months ago
It isn’t the first time that Fauci has suggested that he is “the science” but he took his brazen arrogance to an entirely new level during his chat with Brennan.

In addition to wrapping himself in the science, he also trashed the two Republican senators.

“So anybody who spins lies and threatens and all that theatre that goes on with some of their investigations and the congressional committees and the Rand Pauls and all that other nonsense, that’s noise Margaret, that’s noise.” Fauci smugly declared. “I know what my job is”

Brennen then brought up Senator Ted Cruz, another who has dared to question the high priest of COVID and has called for him to be prosecuted.

Fauci diabolically snickered, then suggested that the Texas Republican is the one who should be prosecuted, inferring that Cruz was involved with the so-called “insurrection” on January 6, an event that has allowed Democrats to portray their political adversaries as terrorists and criminals.

He then answered Brennan’s softball question on whether he’s being scapegoated for Trump’s alleged failures, “Of course, you have to be asleep not to figure that one out.”

However, the CBS interview with Brennan may yet backfire on Fauci who has been able to get away with his scamming of the public at least partially on the basis of him being a kindly, grandfatherly figure. But his mocking and menacing demeanor only succeeded in showing his true colors

https://thenewstalkers.com/vic-eldred/group_discuss/14681/rand-paul-responds-to-faucis-arrogant-unbelievable-statement-that-he-is-the-science
 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
1.1  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  XXJefferson51 @1    8 months ago

05-omicrom-la-1080-390x220.jpg

A.F. BrancoNovember 29, 2021
0

At Your Command

Fearing outrage and retribution from China, W.H.O. Change the name of the new COVID variant from Xi to Omicron. Political…

Read More »
 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
1.1.1  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  XXJefferson51 @1.1    8 months ago

Omicron 

2167345

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
1.1.3  TᵢG  replied to  XXJefferson51 @1.1    8 months ago

Skipping Nu because it is pronounced 'new' was done to avoid public confusion thinking a 'new' virus was out there.

Skipping Xi was done to avoid stupid people from jumping into stupid conspiracy theories thinking that Xi Jinping created a new variant.   Given people jump into ridiculous conspiracy theories on less, this was a smart move by the Who.   Skipping over a letter to avoid a bunch of stupid, emotional misinformation generation from the masses costs nothing and gains much benefit.

Even so, look at you positing a conspiracy theory that this was done out of fear.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
1.1.4  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  TᵢG @1.1.3    8 months ago

We call it Xi anyway 

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
1.1.5  TᵢG  replied to  XXJefferson51 @1.1.4    8 months ago

Nobody takes serious the childish behavior of adults, XX.    All that happens is that the childish behaving adults lose credibility.   Can you not see that?

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
1.1.6  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  TᵢG @1.1.5    8 months ago

Skipping over the Xi designation was childish.  What was the dear leader going to do if he wasn’t catered to?  

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
1.1.7  TᵢG  replied to  XXJefferson51 @1.1.6    8 months ago
Skipping over the Xi designation was childish.

How, exactly, is this childish?  

What was the dear leader going to do if he wasn’t catered to?  

I explained this to you.   The objective, quite likely, was to avoid stupid people engaging in conspiracy theories over a variant named 'Xi'.   Given all the attention you are giving on the tactically sensible decision to skip to the next Greek letter one can only imagine the conspiracy theory you (et. al.) would promote if they had not done that.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
2  TᵢG    8 months ago

Typical partisan crap.

This quote from Fauci:

“Anybody who’s looking at this carefully realizes there’s a distinct anti-science flavor to this, so if they get up and criticize science nobody’s going to know what they’re talking about,” he said, “but if they get up and they really aim their bullets at Tony Fauci well people can recognize that there’s a person there so it’s easy to criticize but they’re really criticizing science because I represent science, that’s dangerous.”

... does not claim that Fauci himself IS science.   He stated, correctly, that he is representing science ... that he is communicating science in his domain of expertise (which is infectious disease).    Represent = 'to speak for'.   That is, after all, his job.

Partisans yet again stupidly spinning everything into an attack.   Truly sickening to behold.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.1  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  TᵢG @2    8 months ago
during an interview with fawning host Margaret Brennan, he rejected criticism from Republican lawmakers including Sen. Rand Paul who has repeatedly grilled him during his appearances for testimony before the Senate by claiming that he is above reproach because anyone who dares to criticize him is attacking science.

During his chat with Brennan, Fauci scoffed at the notion that he should be subjected to legitimate congressional oversight.

“Anybody who’s looking at this carefully realizes there’s a distinct anti-science flavor to this, so if they get up and criticize science nobody’s going to know what they’re talking about,” he said, “but if they get up and they really aim their bullets at Tony Fauci well people can recognize that there’s a person there so it’s easy to criticize but they’re really criticizing science because I represent science, that’s dangerous.”

The rejection of the notion that he be subjected to legitimate congressional oversight drew a swift and severe response from Senator Paul who took to Twitter to take the career bureaucrat down a peg or two.

“The absolute hubris of someone claiming THEY represent science. It’s astounding and alarming that a public health bureaucrat would even think to claim such a thing, especially one who has worked so hard to ignore the science of natural immunity,” Paul wrote.

It isn’t the first time that Fauci has suggested that he is “the science” but he took his brazen arrogance to an entirely new level during his chat with Brennan.

In addition to wrapping himself in the science, he also trashed the two Republican senators.

https://thenewstalkers.com/vic-eldred/group_discuss/14681/rand-paul-responds-to-faucis-arrogant-unbelievable-statement-that-he-is-the-science#cm1695879
 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
2.1.1  TᵢG  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1    8 months ago

Do you think anyone reads comments from you that are simply quotes?    I do not and I suspect the super majority on this site do not. 

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.1.2  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  TᵢG @2.1.1    8 months ago

Just pointing out the juvenile idiocy that is the patron saint of wuhan, lord Fauci 

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
2.1.3  TᵢG  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1.2    8 months ago

All you accomplish is to take your credibility further into the red.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
PhD Guide
2.2  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  TᵢG @2    8 months ago

Fauci isn't representing anything but himself.  He's lied about the origin of the virus.  He's lied about his involvement with the virus.  He's lied about the funding for the gain of function testing.  He's lied about the use of masks.  He's lying about this new strain.  His only interest is self-preservation and even that's failing.  

So yes, it is an attack.  An attack against somebody who should not be in the position he is in. 

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Guide
2.2.1  Thrawn 31  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @2.2    8 months ago
He's lied about the origin of the virus.

Oh? And what IS the origin of the virus? 

He's lied about his involvement with the virus.

Lol, what involvement?

He's lied about the funding for the gain of function testing.

Prove the NIH funded it. 

He's lied about the use of masks.

How so?

He's lying about this new strain. 

In what way?

His only interest is self-preservation and even that's failing.  

Lol, he is doing just fine. His retirement etc. has long since been taken care of, the dude can retire anytime he wants. He will be just fine.

  An attack against somebody who should not be in the position he is in. 

And why not? Who would be better? 

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
2.2.2  TᵢG  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @2.2    8 months ago
Fauci isn't representing anything but himself. 

Jeremy that is ridiculous.   Good grief man, your post reads like extremist talking points.  

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
PhD Guide
2.2.3  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Thrawn 31 @2.2.1    8 months ago

Read the link I gave you in 5.1

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
PhD Guide
2.2.4  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  TᵢG @2.2.2    8 months ago
Good grief man, your post reads like extremist talking points.

Read the link I gave in 5.1. 

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
2.2.5  TᵢG  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @2.2.4    8 months ago

3,234 page data dump???    Surely you have a succinct, credible analysis of this.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
PhD Guide
2.2.6  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  TᵢG @2.2.5    8 months ago

Read it for yourself.  As I am.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
2.2.7  TᵢG  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @2.2.6    8 months ago

Nobody is going to read a 3,234 page document of emails posted by ‘Jeremy’ with a ‘go hunt’ data dump tactic.   Who do you think you are fooling with this tactic?

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
PhD Guide
2.2.8  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  TᵢG @2.2.7    8 months ago
Nobody is going to read a 3,234 page document of emails posted by ‘Jeremy’ with a ‘go hunt’ data dump tactic.

Don't read it.  At the same time, don't come at me with this bullshit.  

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.2.9  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  TᵢG @2.2.2    8 months ago

Fauci is the extremist here.  

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.2.10  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @2.2.8    8 months ago

It’s all Fauci worshippers have…

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Guide
2.4  Thrawn 31  replied to  TᵢG @2    8 months ago

Fauci is right. His critics cannot actually go after anything he is saying because they have no fucking idea what they are talking about and their dipshit supporters even less so, so they have to attack him personally. Of course his critics only goal is to get themselves into media headlines, they don't actually give a shit about the virus, best practices, or how to get through the pandemic, none of that shit gets them campaign donations or book deals. 

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.4.1  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Thrawn 31 @2.4    8 months ago
08-fauci-science-dt-1080-390x220.jpg
A.F. BrancoNovember 30, 2021
0

Lord of the Sand-Flies

Dr. Fauci says you shouldn’t be allowed to criticize him because as he says “I am science. Political cartoon by…

Read More »
 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
3  TᵢG    8 months ago
Dr. Anthony Fauci is evil incarnate.  

And there is your clue to ignore this piece of shit seed. 

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3.1  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  TᵢG @3    8 months ago

Big government bi coastal secular progressive elites always try to ignore the truth. 

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
3.1.1  TᵢG  replied to  XXJefferson51 @3.1    8 months ago

Another one of your stupid stereotypes.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3.1.2  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  TᵢG @3.1.1    8 months ago

Ted Cruz shreds Fauci 'delusions' over his 'I represent science' remark: 'Most dangerous bureaucrat'

Cruz said the American people know Fauci is being dishonest and partisan.

Hannah Grossman2 hours ago

Republican Texas Sen. Ted Cruz blasted "dangerous bureaucrat" NIH Director Dr. Anthony Fauci for claiming that he "represent[s] the science" on Monday's "Hannity."

"I gotta admit, Sean, I was laughing … It is [his] delusions of grandeur that you cannot criticize him. And it was very striking," Cruz said. 

Fauci was interviewed by Margaret Brennan on CBS's "Face the Nation" Sunday where he was asked about the criticism leveled against him regarding his handling of the COVID-19 pandemic

During the interview, Fauci said, "Anybody who's looking at this carefully realizes that there's a distinct anti-science flavor to this. So if they get up and criticize science, nobody's going to know what they're talking about. But if they get up and really aim their bullets at Tony Fauci, well, people could recognize there's a person there. There's a face, there's a voice you can recognize, you see him on television. So it's easy to criticize."

FAUCI WOULD 'NOT BE SURPRISED' IF OMICRON IS ALREADY IN US, PREDICTS IT WILL GO 'ALL OVER'

GettyImages-1234075213.jpg?ve=1&tl=1

Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, listens during a Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee confirmation hearing in Washington, D.C. Photographer: Stefani Reynolds/The New York Times/Bloomberg via Getty Images (Stefani Reynolds/The New York Times/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

"They're really criticizing science because I represent science – that's dangerous. To me, that's more dangerous than the slings and the arrows that get thrown at me. I'm not going to be around here forever, but science is going to be here forever. And if you damage science, you are doing something very detrimental to society long after I leave. And that's what I worry about," Fauci continued. 

Cruz called Fauci the "most dangerous bureaucrat" in American history. 

"Dr. Fauci, I think, is the most dangerous bureaucrat in the history of the country ... he's been dishonest, he's been political, he's been partisan, and the American people know it," Cruz continued.  

Cruz also criticized Brennan for dropping the ball "and not following up" on Fauci's claims. 

"Instead of asking him the simple question: 'You stated that we don't fund gain of function research, the NIH stated. We do fund gain of function research. They can't both be true. And if you lied to Congress, it's a felony. She didn't press him on that," Cruz said. "And the reason this matters is there is a lot of circumstantial evidence to suggest that the U.S. government participated in funding research modifying coronaviruses that could well have led to COVID 19. And if that's true, that is stunning and indefensible."

read more: https://www.foxnews.com/media/ted-cruz-anthony-fauci-represent-science-remarks-most-dangerous-bureaucrat
 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Guide
3.3  Thrawn 31  replied to  TᵢG @3    8 months ago

The seeder is the first clue. You see who posts it and know there is absolutely nothing worth reading, that it is nothing more than a politically biased sack of shit. 

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
4  Kavika     8 months ago

Paul has his ''eye'' on the problem. His eye is next to the problem which lies in his head. 

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
4.1  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Kavika @4    8 months ago

Rand Paul is a great American and his protection of heartland America from the rantings of the patron saint of Wuhan is to be praised.  

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Guide
4.1.1  Thrawn 31  replied to  XXJefferson51 @4.1    8 months ago

Rand Paul is a useless asshole that has not actually done anything except ride the government gravy train the entire time he has been in office. He is the personification of the useless government employee stereotype. He collects a fat paycheck, great benefits and perks all while doing absolutely nothing. 

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Expert
5  Tacos!    8 months ago
because I represent science

Um, he does represent science. That’s literally his role. He reports on the current state of Covid science to the government. The hysterical reaction to this statement of the obvious is silly. Fauci represents science - sometimes in a clumsy way, to be sure, but true all the same. Paul represents his constituents - again sometimes in a pretty ungraceful way. None of this should be controversial.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
PhD Guide
5.1  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Tacos! @5    8 months ago
He reports on the current state of Covid science to the government.

He's a political hack.  No different than Pelosi or Biden.  His "science" changes with the political climate.

Fauci represents science - sometimes in a clumsy way, to be sure, but true all the same.

If he "represents science" then he wouldn't have to cover his ass so much.  It appears clumsy because it is clumsy.  He's losing track of the lies he's told.  Recommend some reading.

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Guide
5.1.1  Thrawn 31  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @5.1    8 months ago
His "science" changes with the political climate.

His science changes the way all science changes, as we learn more. That is the greatest strength of the hard sciences. 

He's losing track of the lies he's told.

Saying something different as we learn more is not lying. Giving information and advice based upon what we know at the time is not lying. 

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
PhD Guide
5.1.2  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Thrawn 31 @5.1.1    8 months ago
Saying something different as we learn more is not lying

Some reading material for you.  

He fucking lied.  

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Expert
5.1.3  Tacos!  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @5.1    8 months ago
His "science" changes with the political climate.

It’s not “his science,” though. He’s just reporting the news. Where I think he gets into trouble is when he starts recommending policy, but that also, is his job.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
5.1.4  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @5.1    8 months ago

And his doctorate is like what, over 50 years old?  

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
5.1.5  TᵢG  replied to  XXJefferson51 @5.1.4    8 months ago

LOL, what difference does that make?    Amazing, XX, just amazing.   You actually do not understand that a degree is simply the foundation for a career of learning and expanding?   Unbelievable.  

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
Professor Principal
5.1.6  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  XXJefferson51 @5.1.4    8 months ago
And his doctorate is like what, over 50 years old?

That is just the beginning. Once you get a Ph.D. you must constantly do research to stay relevant. As the saying goes, "Publish or Perish". 

My daughter is a Ph.D. candidate in autism. She studies neurophysiology, which in laymen's terms means how the brain thinks. She is constantly at research or writing papers.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Expert
5.2  Sean Treacy  replied to  Tacos! @5    8 months ago
m, he does represent science. 

Sort of like how the crooked cop always declares "He is the law" before violating someone's rights. 

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
5.2.1  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Sean Treacy @5.2    8 months ago

Like the evil one suggesting we set our rights aside to obey his dictates?  

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Participates
6  Dismayed Patriot    8 months ago
"the so-called “insurrection” on January 6, an event that has allowed Democrats to portray their political adversaries as terrorists and criminals"

It was clearly an attempted insurrection. If the mob who beat capital police, broke windows and doors, chanted "Hang Mike Pence!" and chased elected legislators with zip ties in hand had managed to get ahold of those they were after they clearly intended to use force to get those legislators to overturn a free and fair election. 

Many of those involved have been tried and convicted, so they are clearly terrorists and criminals.

But the other big lie in this bullshit partisan seed is their weak attempt to claim Dr. Fauci doesn't represent the science. These spineless scum bags are attacking him at the same time we have a new variant because conservative Republicans are desperate to hide their involvement in both downplaying the virus, ridiculing basic safety measures like mask wearing and social distancing and their clear incitement of their constituents who carried out the January 6th attempted insurrection. They are truly below the worst scum on earth, you really can't get more vile than these spineless belly crawlers.

When your Doctor tells you that you have a health issue that needs to be addressed, do you call him "arrogant" because he is "representing the science"? Of course not, that's something only a complete moron and likely uneducated bitter dipshit might do because they don't want to accept the truth and/or despise those who have better educations. They are losers, suckers, gullible scum bags ready to believe anything if it aligns with their ignorant world view or sad useless indoctrinated ideology.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
6.1  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @6    8 months ago

There was no insurrection or attempted one on 1-6-21.  De. Fauci was simply using that illegitimate argument to derail the conversation away from his evil acts and his claim to be science when there is plenty of science that does not agree with him.  It’s just more of the so called “consensus of science bs we see floated around when one side tries to use gatekeepers to silence the expression of the other, Dave Van Zandt style.  

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
6.1.1  devangelical  replied to  XXJefferson51 @6.1    8 months ago
There was no insurrection or attempted one on 1-6-21.

tell that to the 600+ trumpster domestic terrorists still sitting in jail waiting to plead guilty.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
6.1.2  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  devangelical @6.1.1    8 months ago

Not to that.  You are referring to dear leader uncle Joe’s political prisoners being wrongly held in Brandon’s gulag?  

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Guide
6.1.3  Thrawn 31  replied to  XXJefferson51 @6.1.2    8 months ago

They are fucking criminals and deserve nothing but prison time. Frankly I am amazed more officers didn't open fire, really too bad cuz when a mob is attacking you that is an easy to defend deadly force situation. Many of those officers would have been entirely justified in lighting up those mother fuckers.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
6.1.4  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Thrawn 31 @6.1.3    8 months ago

And the next time BLM and Antifa riot and loot destroying a large part of a city with their theft, vandalism, arson, and looting, it will be great to see the local police department cut them all down where they stand with semi auto rifle fire into “peaceful “ protesters lighting up those crowds coast to coast.  Do you like how that sounds because it is what you called for above to  different group.  

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
6.1.5  JBB  replied to  XXJefferson51 @6.1.4    8 months ago

Of the over 600 insurrectionists charged with violent crimes at Trump's January 6th riot and attempted coup ZERO were ANTIFA or BLM...

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
PhD Guide
6.2  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @6    8 months ago
It was clearly an attempted insurrection. If the mob who beat capital police, broke windows and doors, chanted "Hang Mike Pence!" and chased elected legislators with zip ties in hand had managed to get ahold of those they were after they clearly intended to use force to get those legislators to overturn a free and fair election.

"Insurrection"?  Let me guess, you believe the riots in Minneapolis, Baltimore, and Kenosha were "peaceful protests" don't you.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
6.2.1  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @6.2    8 months ago

Great question! 

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
PhD Guide
6.2.2  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  XXJefferson51 @6.2.1    8 months ago

Unfortunately, I won't get an answer.  Never do.

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Participates
6.2.3  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @6.2    8 months ago
"Insurrection"?  Let me guess, you believe the riots in Minneapolis, Baltimore, and Kenosha were "peaceful protests" don't you.

No, those were not peaceful protests and as I have said over and over again I condemn those who participated in any violence, vandalism or looting and believe those persons should be arrested and held accountable. But one thing is for sure, none of those criminals were attempting to overthrow a free and fair national election through violence and vandalism as did those Trump supporters on January 6th.

And yes, it was an attempted insurrection, those who attacked the capital were trying to reject the authority of the government and the constitution and install their own leader as President. They threatened legislators, beat capital police, broke down doors and windows, raided elected officials offices, chanted "Hang Mike Pence!" who is of their own party simply because he refused to break the law and give in to their violent threats and demands.

But your weak what-about-ism and false accusation and mischaracterization are noted.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
PhD Guide
6.2.4  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @6.2.3    8 months ago
But one thing is for sure, none of those criminals were attempting to overthrow a free and fair national election through violence and vandalism as did those Trump supporters on January 6th.

Wait.  You are trying to tell me that there wasn't a single person from the Minnesota, Baltimore, Ferguson, or any other riot in DC on 6 January.  You know this for sure and can back up such a moronic claim.

And yes, it was an attempted insurrection, those who attacked the capital were trying to reject the authority of the government and the constitution and install their own leader as President.

I'd agree with you but that would make us both wrong.

But your weak what-about-ism and false accusation and mischaracterization are noted.

Oh now!  What am I ever going to do?  How will I sleep?  Oh, that's right.  I'm going to continue my day just like every other day and I'll sleep like I normally do.  Not giving a shit about your menial threats.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Expert
7  Sean Treacy    8 months ago

Fauci is not a credible representative.  I'm sure he's a great bureaucratic  politician, but you'd think the government would want someone with a little more integrity and honesty as the face of it's effort. 

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Guide
8  Thrawn 31    8 months ago

Fuck Rand Paul, let me know when that idiot does anything other than run his fucking mouth about things he knows nothing about. Only useful thing he has done while in office is get the shit beat out of him by his neighbor. 

 
 

Who is online

GregTx


33 visitors