╌>

Impeachment is a farce – and Pelosi knows it

  
Via:  XXJefferson51  •  7 years ago  •  16 comments

By:   Bryan Fischer

Impeachment is a farce – and Pelosi knows it
Nancy Pelosi put Adam Schiff in charge of the impeachment charade for one reason: she needs a scapegoat for when this all implodes – and Schiff is it. Like any good explosives expert, she wants to be as far away from the device as possible when it goes off.

Leave a comment to auto-join group We the People

We the People

The author is right.  No fair minded objective observer could conclude that Trump did anything wrong at all much less something that would deserve impeachment.  Many democrats from swing districts will stop this madness.  


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



Nancy Pelosi was an outspoken opponent of impeaching Donald Trump from day one. She knew it would represent a catastrophic misjudgment on the part of her fellow Democrats, would do nothing but energize Trump's base, and make defeating him in 2020 an impossibility.

But she finally got stampeded into going along with this insanity. She and perhaps Steny Hoyer are the only Democrats who see that this whole thing is liable to go over a cliff dragging the entire Democratic Party behind them.

Nancy put Adam Schiff in charge of this charade for one reason. She needs a scapegoat for when this all implodes, and the pompous and unlikeable Schiff is it. Like any good explosives expert, she wants to be as far away from the device as possible when it goes off, and she wants somebody else to take the blame for it. Poor Adam Schiff doesn't realize he has been led into a booby trap, and Nancy is not going to be there for him when the thing blows up.

The only chance the Democrats had in succeeding with this drive-by political assassination was to do it so fast it would be done before people gathered their wits. Well, that window of opportunity has closed and the people are on to them. Impeachment was their desperation fallback maneuver when the Mueller report exonerated Trump of collusion and obstruction charges. When this feeble impeachment effort fails, the Democrats will be left holding an empty bag and hoping a snipe runs into it.

Politically, an impeachment of Trump has no chance of success. By requiring a two-thirds vote to convict, the Founders wisely insisted on a nationwide consensus that a president has been guilty of egregious misconduct before a successful impeachment attempt could succeed. That consensus does not exist. According to a USA Today/Suffolk poll, just 36% of Americans support the impeachment of the president by the House. That's not going to get it done, by a lot.

Other polls have the nation just about evenly split between removal and non-removal. That's light-years short of the two-thirds consensus required. Legislators know they have to answer to their constituents at the ballot box in just a little over a year, which is likely the only reason two Democrats voted last week not to proceed with the impeachment effort. I've been around elected officials long enough to know that after they first get elected the only thing that matters to them is getting reelected. All told, 31 Democrat members of the House represent districts won by Trump in 2016. A vote to remove him is a vote against their own self-interest, and I don't think very many representatives are courageous or stupid enough to do something like that.

Zero Republicans voted to proceed, which is not fatal to impeachment since Democrats control the House, but it's a rock-solid indicator that there is no way they're going to find enough Mitt Romneys to sandbag their own president in the Senate. It ain't gonna happen. According to Gallup, the president enjoys the approval of 87% of his party right now, 10 points higher than the support Obama enjoyed from his party at the same point in his presidency. Fifty Republican senators are already on record opposing this farce, which leaves Democrats at least 17 votes short of a conviction.

A poll by Selzer and Company/Grinnell College reveals that, just like Trump, 70% of Americans are believers in America first, while just 19% self-identify as socialists. That's bad news for Bernie and Liz Warren.

The Washington Post  published a remarkable column recently that flatly said, "Trump without the Trumpiness would win reelection in a landslide." By "Trumpiness," the  Post  means his pugnacious personality, his skewering of everyone who attacks him, and his relentless Twitter feed. In other words, if a kinder-gentler candidate just ran on Trump's record – a persistently strong stock market, record-low unemployment, the biggest tax cut in a generation, below-average gasoline prices, deregulation like we have never seen, an entire rack of constitutionalist judges, and stamping al-Baghdadi's passport to his 72 raisins in the sky – not even Ronald Reagan in his prime could beat him.

For Trump's base, his Trumpiness is not a bug, it's a feature. His Trumpiness is why Trump's base voted for him and why they still passionately love him and support him. Woe to any politician or any political party that's gonna take that on and hopes to live to tell about it.

To make things fatally worse, former senior White House and NSC official Tim Morrison testified last week, "I was not concerned that anything illegal was discussed" on Trump's phone call with Ukrainian president Zelensky. The Democrats' "smoking gun" is starting to shoot blanks.

The number 2 man at the State Department, John Sullivan, told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee last week that he "was not aware" of any effort to pressure Ukraine to investigate the Bidens in exchange for $391 million in military aid. He said he is also unaware of any attempt to push other foreign governments to investigate the president's political rivals. His comments were of a piece with impeachment probe testimony given by former U.S. Special Envoy to Ukraine Kurt Volker, U.S. Ambassador to the European Union  Gordon Sondland , and Acting Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs  Philip Reeker .

What many folks don't even know is that  a treaty with Ukraine, signed in 1998 , gives the president the duty of investigating corruption in Ukraine to protect America's political and financial interests, corruption of precisely the kind Hunter Biden is accused of. Trump's call with President Zelensky was a completely legal and utterly defensible request for cooperation under this binding agreement. The president was just doing his job.

Bret Stephens of  The New York Times , an impassioned Never-Trumper, admitted, regarding Trump's behavior, "whatever else might be said about it, was not unlawful."

The Democrats will soldier on, riding like Tennyson's six hundred into the Valley of Death. But you can stick a fork in impeachment. It's done.



Bryan Fischer hosts "Focal Point with Bryan Fischer" every weekday on AFR Talk ( American Family Radio ) from 1:00 - 2:00 p.m. (Central). He  is author of  The Boy to Man Book: Preparing Your Son for Manhood .



Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2  JohnRussell    7 years ago

You are using Bryan Fischer as a source now?   LOL. What a joke. 

NT really should develop some standards as to what can be seeded. This source is an embarrassment. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3  JohnRussell    7 years ago
For Trump's base, his Trumpiness is not a bug, it's a feature. His Trumpiness is why Trump's base voted for him and why they still passionately love him and support him. Woe to any politician or any political party that's gonna take that on and hopes to live to tell about it.

Fischer must really suck at math. Trump's base is somewhere around 30 or 35% of the adult population. Throw in some independents who still approve of him for some unknown reason and you get to around 40%. Right now 46% of voters say they will not vote for Trump no matter who the Democrat is.  Sounds a tad dire, doesnt it? 

 
 
 
bbl-1
Professor Silent
4  bbl-1    7 years ago

CH4P, the impeachment is not a farce.  It is real and the investigations are ongoing.

The real farce is the man who claimed, "When you're a star--you can do anything."

If Trump is innocent of everything he can simply offer himself under oath to set the record straight.  Why won't he?

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
4.1  MrFrost  replied to  bbl-1 @4    7 years ago

If Trump is innocent of everything he can simply offer himself under oath to set the record straight.  Why won't he?

Because he knows, as well as his lawyers, that he is not capable of telling the truth. He'll get caught in a lie and it would just be another article of impeachment. 

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
5  MrFrost    7 years ago

To put this in perspective, when the impeachment inquiry started for the following, (impeach and remove);

Clinton 29%. 

Nixon 36%

Trump 44%

Nixon would have undoubtedly been impeached and removed. 

Clinton? Impeached, but no removal. 

Donny started at 44% and it has been hovering around 50%. When all the evidence is shown to the public? I think donny is going to be screwed. I am betting that during or shortly after the public hearings, trump will likely resign. That way he can protect his ego. 

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
7  MrFrost    7 years ago

Extortion. 

 
 

Who is online







250 visitors