Sanders’ directors ‘ALL lock accounts’ after more footage shows staffers praising Gulags, re-education and violence
By: Tom Tillison
Just wow! The secular progressive far left really does want to eliminate opposition to them that a gulag re education centers can’t coerce into compliance. They really do despise us deplorable Trump supporters
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
Screengrab YouTube, Project VeritasProject Veritas released an explosive new video on Tuesday featuring some disturbing comments from Kyle Jurek, a Sanders campaign staffer working out of the Iowa office.
Vowing there will be violent repercussions and even death , Jurek called for U.S. cities to “burn” if President Donald Trump is reelected and as troubling as that may seem, a follow-up video out Wednesday may possibly be worse.
“In this new video, Jurek is secretly recorded praising Gulags and speaking favorably about forcing Americans who oppose Sanders’ radical policies to be re-educated,” the Project Veritas website explained.
And while some are dismissing Jurek as a fringe element who doesn’t represent the views of the campaign, James O’Keefe, the face behind Project Veritas, posted a tweet Wednesday afternoon saying Sanders’ state directors are “all locking their accounts” — this being a reference to Twitter. “The recordings give insight into the mindset of many Sanders staffers and what they truly believe,” Project Veritas said in a press release.
Noting that several anonymous tips from people who know Jurek have come in, the release added that there were concerns that he may be a danger to President Trump.
“Even more disturbing is a tip from people who know Jurek personally,” the release added. “They say Jurek is dangerous and becoming more radicalized. They worry he might try to assassinate President Trump.”
Project Veritas said they have reported this information to the US Secret Service.
O’Keefe also tweeted a screenshot of Jurek being tagged as a “top-tier organizer” for the Sanders campaign. According to the video, Jurek is a self-described Anarcho-Communist, and he reveals that there are those associated with the Sanders campaign who are “farther left than the democratic socialism the campaign presents to the public.”
(Sen. Bernie Sanders is a self-avowed democratic socialist.)
The Sanders staffer also suggested members of the violent Antifa group are part of the campaign.
Touting his ilk as saviors of the human race, Jurek talks about a “f*cking revolution” and how violence is necessary to counter those who work against it.
“There are things that are more important than the rule of law in the United States when it comes down to the existence of the human race,” he said.
An emphasis on Gulag-style re-education camps reveals Jurek’s commitment to hardcore communism.
His views don’t entirely rule out the possibility of death.
“There’s a reason Joseph Stalin had Gulags, right? And actually, Gulags are a lot better than what the CIA has told us they were…” Jurek said.
“So, that, that was the intention, of Gulags, right?” he went on. “Not only to elim- like, remove, like people were like insidious to the state from the state, right? Like ‘hey, you guys are all causing problems, you’re like, working against the revolution; we’re just going to remove you and put you in Siberia, where you learn the f*cking value of like being a comrade.”
Proving how uninformed he is, Jurek claimed prisons in the U.S. were “far worse” than the notorious Soviet gulags.
“Far worse than anything that they experienced in a f*cking gulag,” he said. “Like people get raped. People get f*cking — work 12 hours a day. People have to go fight fires in California for a dollar. You know what I mean? That’s f*cked up. That’s super f*cked up. Soviet Union didn’t do that sh*t.”
Jurek then tied it back to the campaign.
“Yeah, you’re not gonna get Bernie to say ‘gulags’ but like, I’m all aboard for Gulags,” he said. “I feel there needs to re-education for a significant portion of our society…I mean, but running for president in the United States you can’t say anything like that right?”
Speaking on the alternative to re-educating people who hold different ideas, he spoke about “putting them up against a wall,” before imitating a shooting noise.
Tags
Who is online
200 visitors
What baloney! Translation: It's difficult to believe that any sane human being would buy into this line of thinking.
And this is different than say the Proud Boys, or David Duke and the KKK being lovers of Trump? Since Trump has not repudiated them, does that make him a white nationalist segregationist? Or what about the guy, what was his name? Oh yeah, Stephen Miller. He works in the White House. Is he proof that Trump hates all non-whites?
Your ploy is tiresome and weak.
Project Veritas is an American Right-wing activist group. The group uses "disguises and hidden cameras to uncover supposed liberal bias and corruption". The group is known for producing deceptively edited videos about media organizations and left-leaning groups. Wikipedia
Or, perhaps you would be more amenable something like this:
As anyone familiar with the Amelia Sedley character in Vanity Fair knows, a kind of airy, above-it-all mentality can supply its own vain satisfactions.
But conservative Christians can’t afford these luxuries. Progressives understand that culture war means discrediting their opponents and weakening or destroying their institutions. Conservatives should approach the culture war with a similar realism. Civility and decency are secondary values. They regulate compliance with an established order and orthodoxy. We should seek to use these values to enforce our order and our orthodoxy, not pretend that they could ever be neutral. To recognize that enmity is real is its own kind of moral duty.
Against David French-ism
Come on, what could be more amenable to you than using the full force of the guvment and its jackboots than to enforce your orthodoxy?
Now I am not commending the individual above, if this is what he said. (I have absolutely no faith in what Project Veritas does.) But if he did, he either has no understanding of a gulag and should probably be sent to one to increase his understanding.
But is this really how you want, or even should proceed? Do you really want to try to make the case that one persons actions or words make another person worthless? Because if you do, I got a few million examples to send your way showing that your choice has no worth either.