╌>

Sarah Palin Advocates Civil War

  
By:  al Jizzerror  •  last year  •  94 comments


Sarah Palin Advocates Civil War
Do you want us to be in civil war? Because that’s what’s going to happen.”

Sponsored by group The Banned Played On

The Banned Played On










Sarah Palin Advocates Civil War







August 25, 2023 ( al Jizzerror Fake News ) - Sarah Palin apparently wants to be Trump’s running mate. I hope she “helps” The Donald as much as she “helped” John McCain.

Is Palin trying to impress Trump by advocating violence, or is she actually trying to destroy the United States?

Palin tried to make "veiled threats" so let's peek under her fucking veil.

Sarah Palin Calls For Trump Supporters To 'Rise Up' Over Arrest, Alludes To 'Civil War'

Although it’s typical for a person accused of a felony to be arrested, Newsmax host Eric Bolling felt compelled to ask Palin if Trump’s arrest was proof of a two-tiered justice system.

Palin responded to the Republican red meat with gusto: “I mean, I think those who are conducting this travesty and creating this two-tier system of justice, I want to ask them: What the heck? Do you want us to be in civil war? Because that’s what’s going to happen.”

Palin vowed that “we’re not going to keep putting up with this,” and praised Bolling for suggesting that “we need to get angry.”

She added: “We do need to rise up and take our country back.”

Palin then griped that the Republican National Committee has “the funds” and “the platform” to stoke “collective anger” over the indictments, but that “they’re too timid, and a bunch of frickin’ RINOs [Republicans in name only] running the thing.”

She warned that the RNC “better get their stuff together, or I have to ask them, too: What do they want as an outcome of this, civil war?”




 main-qimg-c4cc936a8e0aecfd19cfa7ad4f49d7f7



“She’s coming with a full heart and a full magazine.”

I think we all know what Sarah Palin is really “full of”.

Heres' the REAL joke:

512


Red Box Rules

We don't need no stinking rules.


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
al Jizzerror
Masters Expert
1  author  al Jizzerror    last year

I wonder what Sarah Palin's favorite song is?

If you want to know why Palin's gun is warm, just smell the barrel.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.1  devangelical  replied to  al Jizzerror @1    last year

bible spice is itching to bust up some more of them pesky 10 commandments...

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
1.1.1  CB  replied to  devangelical @1.1    last year

Yeah, I am finding my voice again!  How is 'spice' Palin going to square a civil war and her words. . . . 

Palin vowed that “we’re not going to keep putting up with this,” and praised Bolling for suggesting that “we need to get angry.”

She added: “We do need to rise up and take our country back.”

Palin then griped that the Republican National Committee has “the funds” and “the platform” to stoke “collective anger” over the indictments, but that “they’re too timid, and a bunch of frickin’ RINOs [Republicans in name only] running the thing.”

. . .  and the commandment, "Thou shall not kill" (Your fellow citizenry human-beings)

Blah! She is advocating for the spilling of human blood if she can't have Donald Trump free and clear and a law unto himself!  Wowee-wow-wow!

Come on Sarah from Alaska, Arizona, Alaska (redux) female 'plain it to us!  And when you finish, tell us about the INDEPENDENT MAGA 'creatures' that need their . . .wait for it. . . 'COLLECTIVE anger" stoked. You, independent bull-dog moma - you!

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
1.1.2  cjcold  replied to  devangelical @1.1    last year

So tundra Barbie wants to be a 'thing' again?

Hey, Tina Fey we need you again.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.1.3  devangelical  replied to  CB @1.1.1    last year

she's frustrated. maybe hockey mom's hockey player boyfriend isn't "high sticking" her any more...

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
1.1.4  CB  replied to  devangelical @1.1.3    last year

I have a question: Civil war? What side does Palin expect the armed forces of the United States to be?  

Gasp! Will 'law and order' conservatives/republicans open fire and declare war on police and our military? The mere thought of this is enough to conclude that Sarah Palin and those of like mind don't support police and our military anymore!

Or, has Sarah thought that 'deep'?!

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Masters Expert
1.1.5  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  CB @1.1.4    last year
has Sarah thought that 'deep'?!

Deep Thoughts, by Sarah Palin (an oxyMORONIC moment)....

    "I wonder if his hockey stick will hit my cervix?  Or, is it permanently stuck in my throat?"

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
1.1.6  Tessylo  replied to  devangelical @1.1.3    last year

jrSmiley_91_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Masters Expert
1.1.7  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  cjcold @1.1.2    last year
Hey, Tina Fey we need you again.

"I can see Leavenworth from my house."

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.1.8  devangelical  replied to  al Jizzerror @1.1.7    last year

"help me find another baby daddy for bristol, so I can run for elected office again"

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.1.9  devangelical  replied to  devangelical @1.1.8    last year

... "and help her pay for that revolving door".

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
1.2  cjcold  replied to  al Jizzerror @1    last year

That rifle she is holding is chambered for a very long magnum round.

The scope is a very high dollar long range Leupold scope.

Don't know if tundra Barbie has the skill, but that is a thousand yard gun.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.2.1  devangelical  replied to  cjcold @1.2    last year

she's a lot more familiar with handling a single shot that barely clears the barrel...

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
2  CB    last year

Sarah, Sarah, Sarah. My, my, my. What can I say to that?  I don't have words right now. 

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
3  Kavika     last year

She belongs at the very end of the Aleutian Chain then she really can see Russia but the Indigenous Americans will probably use her for whale bait.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
3.1  devangelical  replied to  Kavika @3    last year

I think sarah as polar bear bait would be better for that self professed mama grizzly...

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
3.1.1  cjcold  replied to  devangelical @3.1    last year

With or without lipstick?

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
3.1.2  devangelical  replied to  cjcold @3.1.1    last year

I think she puts that on her pit bull.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
4  TᵢG    last year

Sure why not?   With Trump as the almost certain nominee, the GOP will grow increasingly shrill.   Might as well pile on the nutcases too.   Welcome to the show, Sarah.

What a fucking mess the GOP has made of itself.

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Masters Expert
4.1  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  TᵢG @4    last year
Welcome to the show, Sarah.

Yeh, make into a shit show.

If you add Palin's IQ to Trump's IQ, you will still be in double digits.

512

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
4.1.1  Ozzwald  replied to  al Jizzerror @4.1    last year
If you add Palin's IQ to Trump's IQ, you will still be in double digits.

Double digits?  I think you are being too generous.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
4.1.2  Tessylo  replied to  Ozzwald @4.1.1    last year

My thoughts exactly

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
4.2  devangelical  replied to  TᵢG @4    last year

it would be funnier if it wasn't such a national tragedy unfolding before us. voting the insanity out is our only recourse and the default solution.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
4.2.1  TᵢG  replied to  devangelical @4.2    last year

You do not see me smiling.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
4.2.2  CB  replied to  TᵢG @4.2.1    last year

This is so unbelievably dangerous. . . and all the making of one man who won't go away of his own volition and those who plan to task themselves as TRUMP 2.0!  

But what can you do? Sarah Palin has decided to take to the field, y'all!

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
4.2.3  cjcold  replied to  CB @4.2.2    last year

What a great ticket. Trump/Palin. 

The late night guys would have a field day!

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
4.2.4  Tessylo  replied to  cjcold @4.2.3    last year

If the writer's strike ever ends.

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
4.2.5  cjcold  replied to  Tessylo @4.2.4    last year

Those jokes would write themselves.

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Expert
4.2.6  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  cjcold @4.2.5    last year

You mean like with Chat GPT?

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
4.3  Tessylo  replied to  TᵢG @4    last year

A freakshow FFS.

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
5  Buzz of the Orient    last year

This isn't a joke.  I could see a civil war really happening.   IMO it's already had some pre-emptive things happening such as people being banned from restaurants because of differing politics, the Kyle Rittenhouse situation, the Jan6 insurrection, the shooting of a storeowner for flying a pride flag, the fact that people have been told not to discuss politics at family get-togethers, etc - the "divide" is widening and deepening.  With all those guns, it's like the Yellowstone supervolcano, festering and ready to blow at any time, and who knows what would happen if Trump eggs it on.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
5.1  CB  replied to  Buzz of the Orient @5    last year

This is not a joke. This nation's enemies will not sit by and not participate in the provoking of this country to tear itself into two halves, or more factions. Sarah Palin is playing right into the enemies of this country's hands. 

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
5.1.1  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  CB @5.1    last year

What "enemy" do you think wants America torn apart?  Don't fall for what America's leaders SAY is its enemy for political points. 

 
 
 
Waykwabu
Freshman Silent
5.1.2  Waykwabu  replied to  Buzz of the Orient @5.1.1    last year

The "psyche" shared by so many Americans  ( and other nations also) that only they are correct, and everyone else is wrong.

I sincerely hope that we never see another  American civil  war.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
5.1.3  Greg Jones  replied to  Waykwabu @5.1.2    last year

That's what the leftists truly believe

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
5.1.4  cjcold  replied to  CB @5.1    last year
and not participate

Putin already has. His propaganda machine was very active in 2016.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
5.1.5  CB  replied to  Buzz of the Orient @5.1.1    last year

Why would you ask me that? It is generally accepted that countries have competition of all sorts. And some competition devoids into rifts, separations, deep international divides, and  wars resulting in the use of destructive munitions and losses. 

I wrote nothing strange with making such an observation: The U.S. states has enemy nations who not only seek to divide 'her,' they seek to knock her off her seat as leader of the free world. 

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
5.1.6  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  CB @5.1.5    last year

Thank you for your reply, although you didn't answer my question.  You gave me a generalization.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
5.1.7  CB  replied to  Buzz of the Orient @5.1.6    last year

You need a detail record of countries that compete against the U.S. for status and position? Really, Buzz—tell me WHY!

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
5.1.8  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  CB @5.1.7    last year

LOL. Stop with the games, CB.  YOU used the word ENEMY.  Are you telling me that America considers every nation that may compete in some way with it to be an ENEMY?  Is a nation that PEACEFULLY surpasses America to become the number one nation in the world the ENEMY?  I asked who does America consider to be an ENEMY, did I not?  I always thought that a country that would invade America, or its military bases, or deliberately shoot down an American airplane or sink an American ship might be considered an enemy.  But a competitor?  That's overkill. 

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
5.1.9  CB  replied to  Buzz of the Orient @5.1.8    last year

What makes you think I am playing games or trying to humor you are anyone else about this? 

Also, I asked you: WHY?

The 'situation' does not stipulate who goes "first."  In an exchange, you ask about "America's Enemy" -singular. I actually state, "enemies," plural. In furtherance of understanding why you are probing me for the obvious. . . I sense something. . . and I want you to be open with me about what motivates you to ask me for a list of this country's enemies. 

Why? Why do you want me to specify America's enemies? Which by the way, I had no need of further defining-leaving it up to discerning individuals to 'know' from the prevailing times we live.

Finally, a list of the U.S. enemies would likely start a discussion that goes beyond the topic about Sarah Palin, civil war, or this nation's internal conflicts, and that is why I am not willing to whole-heartedly engage in that.  In that sense, it was a passing remark-not something to dwell on or become a point of contention.

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
5.1.10  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  CB @5.1.9    last year

Very well.  The "why" was because I was curious.  And since you are reluctant to further discuss what you started, so am I, because, as you said: "... it was a passing remark-not something to dwell on ..."  End of conversation.

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
5.2  cjcold  replied to  Buzz of the Orient @5    last year

These days remind me of the civil war.

Brother against brother due to far right wing fascist political propaganda.

Many who used to be friends are now enemies due to right wing political lies.

The far right wing are doing their best to divide this country.

This sort of fascism is what created Nazi Germany.

Hate of the "other" should not be a political platform in the USA. 

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Masters Expert
5.2.1  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  cjcold @5.2    last year
Hate of the "other" should not be a political platform in the USA.

Hate is The Donald's platform.  

The MAGA cult believes that Trump hates the same people they hate.

ReTrumplicans believe the lies their fearful leader spews.

Sarah Palin is one of Trump's apostles. 

Maybe Palin is seeking a missionary position.

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
5.2.2  cjcold  replied to  al Jizzerror @5.2.1    last year

[deleted]

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
5.2.3  devangelical  replied to  cjcold @5.2.2    last year

mostly folks that are contractors, lawyers, and gullible republicans...

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
5.2.4  cjcold  replied to  cjcold @5.2.2    last year

[Deleted]

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Participates
5.3  Thrawn 31  replied to  Buzz of the Orient @5    last year

Palin and those like her will be the cause of any civil war if it occurs. A group of pieces of shit that are milking a segment of the population for every penny they can squeeze by stirring up the mort hateful and harmful emotions in them.

Either people like Palin are sure the rest of us responsible members of society won’t let things come to a head and they can keeping milking these idiots with impunity, or they already have their suitcases stuffed and a ready to leave the country when their bullshit bears fruit.

Regardless Palin and her ilk have no intention of being around if things go downhill, just a giant middle finger in the rear view mirror for the nation they ruined.

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
5.3.1  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  Thrawn 31 @5.3    last year

As I've said before, I think Trump should run.  I'm sure either his wonderful friend Kim or for sure Putin would grant him asylum free from extradition.

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
5.3.2  cjcold  replied to  Buzz of the Orient @5.3.1    last year

And he has that huge Boeing 757 to do it with. 

Last I heard leaving the state was a no,no.

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
5.3.3  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  cjcold @5.3.2    last year

Yeah, but if the police aren't keeping an eye on it then they are unbelievably stupid and deserve to lose him.  

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
5.3.4  devangelical  replied to  cjcold @5.3.2    last year

he's all bent out of shape because he can't leave the states for a golf tournament in scotland.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
5.3.5  devangelical  replied to  devangelical @5.3.4    last year

... flight risk.

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
6  Bob Nelson    last year

Sarah who?

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
6.1  cjcold  replied to  Bob Nelson @6    last year

Just think Tina Fey on SNL.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
7  JohnRussell    last year

She better be careful or someone will put a target on her like she did with Gabrielle Giffords. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
7.1  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @7    last year

I hate subjecting myself to such groups, but I happened to see your dishonest commentary.

“Was this attack evidence of how vicious American politics has become? Probably. In 2011, Jared Lee Loughner opened fire in a supermarket parking lot, grievously wounding Representative Gabby Giffords and killing six people, including a 9-year-old girl. At the time, we and others were sharply critical of the heated political rhetoric on the right. Before the shooting, Sarah Palin’s political action committee circulated a map of targeted electoral districts that put Ms. Giffords and 19 other Democrats under stylized cross hairs. But in that case no connection to the shooting was ever established.”
—  New York Times editorial board , June 14

This quote is from a corrected version of a New York Times editorial that had falsely claimed that the gunman in the 2011 Giffords shooting was politically incited by Palin’s political action committee. Many readers asked about the uncorrected version, which initially claimed “the link to political incitement was clear” between the gunman’s actions and the map portraying crosshairs, including one over Giffords’s congressional district in Southern Arizona.

On Jan. 11, 2011 — three days after the shooting — The Fact Checker   called this charge “bogus.”  Alas, this debunked talking point still exists.

The Fact Checker is not a media critic, nor is it an opinion column that argues with other editorial opinions. We don’t play gotcha, and we appreciate when falsehoods are corrected. But this episode showed how pervasive this debunked talking point still is on the political left, and we wanted to set the record straight.

As the corrected version of the Times’s editorial notes, no connection was established between this map and the 2011 shooting.

The Facts

Gun control is back in the national debate, after the   shooting  Wednesday at a baseball practice among congressional Republicans. House Majority Whip Steve Scalise (R-La.) was critically injured, and four others were wounded. The shooting quickly became political. The gunman, who died after a shootout with police, had volunteered for the 2016 Democratic presidential campaign of Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and posted angry and vulgar comments on social media aimed at President Trump.

The bogus claim that a map of crosshairs by Sarah Palin’s PAC incited Rep. Gabby Giffords’s shooting - The Washington Post

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
7.1.1  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @7.1    last year

We knew exactly, everyone knows what sarah the pitbull palin meant Vic, stop believing the lies.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
7.1.2  Tessylo  replied to  Tessylo @7.1.1    last year

We know that's what incited the scumbag who shot her.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
7.1.3  devangelical  replied to  Vic Eldred @7.1    last year

according to the DHS and FBI, 96% of political violence resulting in death in the last 10 years is attributed to right wing activism.

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
7.1.4  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Vic Eldred @7.1    last year

It is my honest opinion that Sarah Palin certainly really couldn't do any worse as a VP than Harris has. I rate them about equally.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
7.1.5  devangelical  replied to  devangelical @7.1.3    last year

after 1/6/21 you can be a patriot or a trumpster, but you can't be both...

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
7.1.6  devangelical  replied to  Vic Eldred @7.1    last year

people that have been on the wrong side of history for over 6 decades should probably stay put...

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
8  Greg Jones    last year

Loughner was a radical left winger, as most mass shooters have turned out to be.

 
 
 
sandy-2021492
Professor Expert
8.1  sandy-2021492  replied to  Greg Jones @8    last year

I'm sure you'll provide statistics to support this, rather than just drop an allegation and run away /s

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
8.1.1  devangelical  replied to  sandy-2021492 @8.1    last year

... always the optimist. /s

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Participates
8.2  Thrawn 31  replied to  Greg Jones @8    last year

Of course he is, if anyone does anything bad they are a “left winger” in your world. From what I recall he was just an extremely mentally disturbed guy with easy access to firearms, but whatever.

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
9  Tacos!    last year

Go to war? Over what? Due process? 

Trump has been charged with crimes. As a result, he is not being summarily exiled or executed. He is not being thrown in prison without trial for the rest of his life. A mob did not chase him down and hang him.

In many countries around the world, and throughout history, something like that would have happened already.

Instead, as an American in America, he is free on his own recognizance after paying the most minimal amount of bail - a joke amount for a man of his wealth. He is also allowed to travel freely (many people awaiting trial are confined to the jurisdiction unless they get special permission to travel) with his own airplane.

He has all the attorneys he can hire. He will get to have hearings so he can exclude evidence that is unfair to him. He will sit through a jury trial, and if he doesn’t like the outcome, he can appeal to higher courts. And even if convicted, it’s still possible he could be sworn in again as president.

So what the actual fuck is there to go to war over?

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
9.1  Bob Nelson  replied to  Tacos! @9    last year

Lock her up!

(No trial required.)

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
9.1.1  cjcold  replied to  Bob Nelson @9.1    last year

Clear and present danger.

Holding a sniper rifle and speaking threats?

Who the hell gets away with that sort of thing?

Palen is not just a joke. That's a 1000 yard gun she's holding.

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Masters Expert
9.1.2  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  Bob Nelson @9.1    last year
Lock her up! (No trial required.)

She would plead, "Not guilty, by reason of stupidity." 

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Masters Expert
9.2  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  Tacos! @9    last year
So what the actual fuck is there to go to war over?

The MAGA cult wants to kill liberals.

Naturally, they have no real reason to start a Civil War, butt, if their fearful leaders loses (again), they will believe him if he says the election was stolen (again).

512

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
9.2.1  Tessylo  replied to  al Jizzerror @9.2    last year

They threatened to kill the judge if he goes to jail.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
9.2.2  Tessylo  replied to  Tessylo @9.2.1    last year

One of his supporters/enablers and defenders of the indefensible I meant to say, one instance I'm aware of.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
9.2.3  CB  replied to  al Jizzerror @9.2    last year

Let's be clear, a 21st century civil war will not look anything like a 19th century civil war on the ground. This time around the nation has a standing, operating, seasoned standing military.

That said, Sarah Palin and the circumstance observed above is one more evidential reason for why TRUMP must never be permitted to serve his country as President/Commander in Chief again!

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
9.2.4  Tacos!  replied to  CB @9.2.3    last year
a 19th century civil war

Yeah, she has forgotten - or never learned - that we already had a civil war. Her side lost.

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Masters Expert
9.2.5  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  Tacos! @9.2.4    last year
we already had a civil war. Her side lost.

jrSmiley_13_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
9.2.6  devangelical  replied to  Tacos! @9.2.4    last year
we already had a civil war. Her side lost

gee, I wonder why she and her like minded friends keep hinting at wanting to be reminded?

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
9.3  CB  replied to  Tacos! @9    last year

A+  Tacos! You are invited to come to the head of the class!  Brilliant analysis: Delivered plainly, clearly, and profoundly.   

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Participates
9.4  Thrawn 31  replied to  Tacos! @9    last year

He is getting the most gentle treatment any accused criminal in the history of the country has ever received, and he and his supporters STILL whine like spoiled fucking babies about how unfair things are. 

I fully expect him to complain about anything and everything, he is the ultimate victim and as such is absolutely insufferable, but it truly is pathetic to watch his supporters think of and treat him the same way he does himself. 

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
10  Kavika     last year

By following our laws, it's called Due Process the US is going to have a civil war if Trump is convicted?

Seems that the party of ''Law and Order'' really has no idea of the US judicial system or how it operates.

Welcome to the ''Comatose Party''.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
10.1  Tessylo  replied to  Kavika @10    last year

They're the "Do As I Say Not As I Do Party"

 
 
 
GregTx
Professor Guide
10.1.1  GregTx  replied to  Tessylo @10.1    last year

That's a rather ironic post.

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Principal
11  Gsquared    last year

She's a nasty piece of work.

800

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
11.1  CB  replied to  Gsquared @11    last year

I pity the poor turkeys in the pen watching the carnage of themselves day in and out! Probably still happening even today there! Of course, that would mean. . .all those turkeys in the pen ended up in the hopper long ago. 

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Expert
11.1.1  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  CB @11.1    last year
I pity the poor turkeys in the pen watching the carnage of themselves day in and out!

I'm sure that they really appreciate your pity.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
11.1.2  CB  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @11.1.1    last year

Why? Why are you "sure" of anything about this comment I made to Gsquared? What is your issue for following me around? Step off.

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Principal
11.1.3  Gsquared  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @11.1.1    last year

I have no doubt that you know what turkeys are thinking.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
11.1.4  devangelical  replied to  Gsquared @11.1.3    last year

... especially the ones without their heads.

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Expert
12  Drinker of the Wry    last year

A Repub Maxine Waters.

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Participates
13  Thrawn 31    last year

People like her are the absolute worst. They say shit like this and stir up the emotions of the dumbest among us because they are supremely confident that if anything ever goes down they will be insulated from it.

They are just trying to make a quick buck by stoking the most idiotic ideas of the most most gullible parts of the population, with zero concern for the possible consequences. People like her will be the first to flee if anything ever does happen.

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
13.1  evilone  replied to  Thrawn 31 @13    last year
They say shit like this and stir up the emotions of the dumbest among us because they are supremely confident that if anything ever goes down they will be insulated from it.

I think she's trying to remain relevant. The alt+right populist swamp is pretty small so it really doesn't take much for the shittiest to rise to the top. They also tend to think that pool is bigger than it is... They are really only about 17% of the population and if any violence really starts that number goes down so fast... Many of the shock troops are already being sent to prison for J6 so who would actually be around to start a freaking civil war. As you say 'they' will be insulated, so who's going to be marching across cities and towns of America looking to 'take back their country?' Any real insurrection, or attempt at civil war, would be put down so fast - Ashely Babbitt fast.

Not that they wouldn't talk a good game, or feel bad when they incite a whack job or two either.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
13.1.1  devangelical  replied to  evilone @13.1    last year

doing a couple laps as hostess inside the terrorist compound at gitmo might shut her up...

 
 
 
freepress
Freshman Silent
14  freepress    last year

Fake "rebel" says what? She is still mad as a hornet that she proved to be one of the biggest losers the Republican party ever embraced.

 
 

Who is online


Jack_TX


425 visitors