Jihadi Terrorism: You Think It’s Just the Jews? Think Again.
Jihadi Terrorism: You Think It’s Just the Jews? Think Again.
By Giulio Meotti, Gatestone Institute, July 15, 2016
The bullet-riddled truck that was used by a Tunisian-born Islamist terrorist to murder 84 people in Nice, France on July 14, 2016. (Image source: France24 video screenshot)
Last night, at least 84 people were murdered in the French city of Nice by a Tunisian-born Islamist terrorist, with dozens more victims wounded. The attacker drove a 19-ton truck into a large crowd of people celebrating Bastille Day, France's national holiday, running down men, women and children over a 2km stretch of road and sidewalk.
On July 2, nine Italian citizens were butchered by Islamists in the assault at a restaurant in Dhaka, Bangladesh. They were tortured and killed with " very sharp blades " wielded by smiling terrorists who spared the life of those who knew the Quran. For almost a year already, poor Bangladeshis have been experiencing similar shocking massacres. But hose victims were not wealthy non-Muslim foreigners -- they were anonymous Muslim bloggers, accused of " blasphemy " and murdered out with "sharp blades" -- five victims in 2015 and a law student in 2016, as well as a Hindu priest hacked to death.
The same cycle took place in Syria and Iraq, where the beheaders of the Islamic State first targeted many Western journalists, then expelled and killed Christians in Mosul, and then landed in Paris to exterminate Western civilians.
Two weeks ago, a 13-year-old Israeli girl was stabbed to death while sleeping in her bed. As in Bangladesh, the Palestinian Arab terrorist used a knife to kill Hallel Yaffa Ariel . That is not a simple act of murder; it is a slaughter that wrongly equates building a home with murdering a child. Italian newspapers even deprived her of identity. Il Corriere della Sera, Italy's second largest newspaper, wrote: " West Bank: 13-year-old American killed ".
When four Israelis were murdered last month in Tel Aviv's Max Brenner restaurant, the whole foreign media again had "mistaken" headlines. From Le Monde to Libération , the French press used the word "shooting" instead of terrorism. CNN reported about the "terrorists" in quotation marks. La Repubblica , Italy's largest newspaper, called the Palestinian Arab terrorists "aggressors".
What do these distorted headlines mean? That we in the West naively believe that there are two kinds of terror: "international terror" that targets Westerners in Nice, Paris, Dhaka, Raqqa or Tunisia; and "national" terror, between the Arabs and Israel, in the face of which the Israeli Jews must retreat and surrender. There is also "faceless terror," as in Orlando, where an Afghan-American Muslim massacred 50 Americans and everybody, as usual in America, refused to name "Islam."
It is the reaction of the appeaser, "one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last" according to Winston Churchill. The problem is that whether you are pacifists or warmongers, gays or heterosexuals, atheists or Christians, wealthy or poor, blasphemers or devout, French or Iraqis, jihadi terrorism does not discriminate. Every one of us is a target: Islamist terrorism is genocidal.
Despite easy slogans such as "Je Suis Charlie", very few in the West showed solidarity with the French cartoonists of Charlie Hebdo . Most Europeans thought those journalists were looking for trouble and found it. Or worse, as the Financial Times' editor said, that they were " stupid ". But after January 7 came November 13. By then, no one still blamed cartoons of Mohammed for the terrorist attacks in Paris.
While the Islamic State was enslaving and raping hundreds of Yazidi girls, our intrepid feminists in the West were very busy fighting for an Irish referendum on gay marriage. They clearly did not care about the fate of their Yazidi and Kurdish "sisters". Those victims were hidden away in the remote and exotic East, as were the murdered secular Muslim bloggers in Bangladesh.
It is time to remember the famous poem by Martin Niemöller , a German Christian pastor who was imprisoned in a concentration camp for 7 years by the German Nazi regime:
First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out —
Because I was not a Socialist.
Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out —
Because I was not a Trade Unionist.
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out —
Because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for me — and there was no one left to speak out for me.
Similarly, when Islamist terrorists target Muslim dissident bloggers, faraway Yazidi women or Israeli girls -- and they are enslaved, flogged, raped or murdered -- it should concern us in the West. Islamists are just sharpening their knives on them before coming for us.
If we do not speak out today, we will be punished for our indolence tomorrow.
Giulio Meotti, Cultural Editor for Il Foglio, is an Italian journalist and author.
How long have I been saying this? How many times have I posted Niemoller's poem as a warning?
It seems that at least some people in Europe are finally waking up, given the popularity of nationalist candidates.
People want to believe that this can be bridged by striving for greater understanding, acceptance and "multiculturalism".
1)"Understanding" in today's world is fraught with bias, which includes a healthy dose of the "innocent majority" meme. The majority are not innocent, as poll after poll indicates no less than a tacit acceptance of anti-Western norms and violence.
2)"Acceptance" results in nothing but ingratitude, and is a signal to take advantage of the hospitality that tolerant nations have bestowed upon these people. When the Irish, Italians, Japanese and Jews came to America 150 years ago, we came with an unmitigated gratitude for being allowed to live in the greatest country in the world, and a desire to make our country even greater. Today's immigrants come in with their hands out, and an indignant lashing out at the prospect and at the mere suggestion of becoming a productive citizen of the country that chooses to absorb them.
3)"Multiculturalism" is a farce. It only exists when the new citizen chooses to take part in their new nation's joys and sorrows. It is non-existent with today's immigrants.
Yesterday's tragedy was another message, brought to you by hate. The terrorist chose Bastille Day, the French Independence Day, the day a nation celebrates its freedom and democratic standing. The enemies of freedom choose these days to trumpet their intolerance for freedom.
Well said, Jonathan, but I would accentuate a little more their refusal to assimilate, at least to accept the laws and customs of the lands to which they migrate.
Great seed Buzz. Thanks for sharing it with us.
Most will continue to keep their heads buried in the sand. After all, when their leaders and media whitewash, deny and ignore the spread of jihad, the public will follow suit. In Europe it's even becoming a crime to criticize jihad.
Buzz, it would never occur to me to blame Jihadists on the Jewish people of Israel. I mean, that thought never crossed my mind... I don't know where this is coming from, nor do I understand how the Jewish people feel as if they are being blamed for it.
The Jihadists are radicalized MUSLIMS, who have no compunction about killing anyone. Even their own... The two are not at all related, in my mind.
I support Israel fully, in their quest to end the terror. May God help them.
"Multiculturalism" is a farce. It only exists when the new citizen chooses to take part in their new nation's joys and sorrows. It is non-existent with today's immigrants.
I agree. Milton Friedman is talking about illegal immigration in this audio (for Buzz), but it applies to illegal immigration, refugees or anyone coming into this country who will not be a productive citizen for an extended period of time.
When I lived in Rome, I lived as the Romans did. Of course I didn't live in Rome, but anyone planning on living in this country needs to leave the ways of their previous homeland behind or at least in the backseat and accept the values of this country.
Of course I believe a person must be legal, vetted and productive if they want to live in this country. I don't feel any guilt for feeling this way. I can see the Cloward-Piven strategy a mile away and it doesn't make any sense to overload the welfare system, nor does it make any sense to use compassion for a reason to bring people into this country who will not accept our values and will be a drain on our resources and in many cases for their entire lives.
Thanks, Six. However, it cuts off before the end of his speech. In any event, I agree with him. My parents' families immigrated to Canada more than a century ago, and they had to make their own way without welfare benefits of any kind. They worked hard, did without luxuries, and eventually found success. Now there is a point system for migrants to qualify, but I suppose it does not apply to the more recent refugees, whose permanence should IMO depend upon their contribution over a certain period of time, because if they become a burden to the state after being helped to get themselves started and settled and assimilated, but they fail to do so, they should not receive the benefits earned by those who "do as the Romans do" and become self-supporting.