╌>

GOP Lawmaker Wants To 'Purge' FBI And Justice Dept.

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  galen-marvin-ross  •  7 years ago  •  67 comments

GOP Lawmaker Wants To 'Purge' FBI And Justice Dept.


A Republican lawmaker called on the heads of the FBI and Department of Justice on Tuesday to "purge" its "deep state" personnel.
Florida Representative Francis Rooney bemoaned the FBI's Trump-Russia probe during an interview with MSNBC's Hallie Jackson, saying, "That investigation is totally off the rails," and called on the justice department to clean house.

"I'm very concerned that the DOJ and FBI, whether you want to call it 'deep state' or what, are kind of off the rails," he said.
Rooney cited the recent revelation that one of the FBI's top investigators, Peter Strzok, had sent anti-Trump text messages, to bolster his argument. Special Counsel Robert Mueller, who is heading up the investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election, removed Strzok in July immediately after learning about the texts.

Rooney also mentioned a former associate deputy attorney general, Bruce Ohr, who was demoted at the justice department after it was revealed he had undisclosed meetings with officials from Fusion GPS, the company that commissioned the controversial Trump dossier that the national intelligence agencies have not fully corroborated. The lawmaker also brought up money FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe's wife received while running for a Virginia state Senate seat in 2015. Trump tweeted in July that Jill McCabe had gotten $700,000 from Clinton, though Politifact deemed that claim "mostly false."
RELATED: TRUMP AND RUSSIA: ROBERT MUELLER'S CAMPAIGN INVESTIGATION COULD LAST ANOTHER YEAR OR MORE, REPORT SAYS
MSNBC's Jackson pressed Rooney on his criticisms of the FBI and Department of Justice.
"How does that not, sort of, undermine the work that these agencies are doing?" she asked.

"Those aforementioned examples are really nerve-wracking to me and undermine my confidence that the agencies don't respect the Constitution," He said, adding, "People need a good clean government."
Jackson pushed back again. "There are those who look at comments like that ones that you're making and say that Republicans are working to essentially try to discredit the Department of Justice and thus discredit the investigations. Is that not what you're doing?"
"I don't want to discredit them," Rooney answered. "I would like to see the directors of those agencies purge it and say, 'look, we've got a lot of great agents, a lot of great lawyers here,' those are the people that I want the American people to see and know the good works being done, not these people who are kind of the deep state."
Rooney's comments come after Trump renewed his attacks against McCabe and the FBI over the holiday weekend. Trump critics say the spate of attacks on the bureau and justice department are a tactic to erode public trust in the agencies' credibility.
McCabe is expected to retire in the next few months, according to the Washington Post.


A personal note from me, this is the same kind of "Purge" that was done to the KGB whenever a new leader took over during the days of the USSR, the old guard was purged if they didn't see eye to eye with the new leader.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/gop-lawmaker-wants-to-purge-fbi-and-justice-dept/ar-BBHo5tN?li=AA5a8k&ocid=spartanntp


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Galen Marvin Ross
Sophomore Participates
1  seeder  Galen Marvin Ross    7 years ago

Hitler even had a "Purge" when he first took over.

Purge is definitely not the right word to use in a situation like this, we are not the Soviet Union or, Nazi Germany........for now.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.1  Texan1211  replied to  Galen Marvin Ross @1    7 years ago

purge
[pərj]

VERB
rid (someone) of an unwanted feeling, memory, or condition, typically giving a sense of cathartic release:
"Bob had helped purge Martha of the terrible guilt that had haunted her"
NOUN
an abrupt or violent removal of a group of people from an organization or place:
"a purge of the ruling class is absolutely necessary" · [more]
synonyms: removal · expulsion · ejection · exclusion · eviction · dismissal · sacking · [more]

 
 
 
Galen Marvin Ross
Sophomore Participates
1.1.1  seeder  Galen Marvin Ross  replied to  Texan1211 @1.1    7 years ago

So, tell me, why does this Republican think that there needs to be a "purge" in the FBI? It is controlled by Republican appointee's, the investigation into the meddling of our elections by the Russians is being headed by a Republican, the head of the FBI is a Republican. Tell me also, why does this Republican think that Mueller, who is a Republican as well, wants to be a "left wing hero"? Are Republicans now "left wing"?

 
 
 
lennylynx
Sophomore Quiet
1.1.2  lennylynx  replied to  Galen Marvin Ross @1.1.1    7 years ago

To today's demented right in America, anyone who thinks Barack Obama is an American citizen, is a full blown communist.  White supremacists are not some fringe element like we thought, [hoped?] they RULE the Republican party.  The king of birthers is President.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.1.3  Texan1211  replied to  Galen Marvin Ross @1.1.1    7 years ago

Do you believe that the FBI agents caught texting derogatory comments about Trump and favorable ones for Hillary were Republicans? Oh, that's so cute of you!

 
 
 
Willjay9
Freshman Silent
1.1.4  Willjay9  replied to  Texan1211 @1.1.3    7 years ago

So because you have 3 FBI agents are not biased on who they wanted as POTUS constitutes a "purge"?!

Wow, I guess there is no such thing as a good cop then huh?...

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.1.5  Texan1211  replied to  Galen Marvin Ross @1.1.1    7 years ago

Maybe we need change because the FBI "cleared" Abuela before the investigation was complete? Because the Justice Dept. refused to prosecute her or even take it to a grand jury? Because Mueller's team is loaded with Hillary flacks? Maybe because the JD head under Obama met with the husband of a person under investigation--secretly (so they hoped!)

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.1.6  Texan1211  replied to  Willjay9 @1.1.4    7 years ago

WTF? Why would anyone purge UNBIASED agents???

Tell you what though--if there is only 3 unbiased agents, the FBI has REAL problems.

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
1.1.7  cjcold  replied to  Texan1211 @1.1.5    7 years ago

So how many times did the GOP investigate Hillary and find nothing? According to Einstein doing the same thing over and over and over again and expecting different results is the definition of insanity.

 
 
 
Willjay9
Freshman Silent
1.1.8  Willjay9  replied to  Texan1211 @1.1.6    7 years ago

My mistake I meant unbiased........but still why would anyone feel the need to purge the FBI just because  a handful of agents openly professed their POLITICAL BIASENESS?

 
 
 
Willjay9
Freshman Silent
1.1.9  Willjay9  replied to  Texan1211 @1.1.5    7 years ago

So let me get this straight......you want the FBI cleared because of you biasness against Clinton, based on a lot of assumptions that was thoroughly investigated as nothing.........like I said before I guess there's no such thing as a good cop in some peoples eyes!

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
1.1.10  Trout Giggles  replied to  Texan1211 @1.1.3    7 years ago

So because someone make derogatory comments about one candidate and good comments about the other, they are "deep state"?

Well...shit......looks like I'm deep state, too.

 
 
 
Galen Marvin Ross
Sophomore Participates
1.1.11  seeder  Galen Marvin Ross  replied to  Texan1211 @1.1.5    7 years ago
Maybe we need change because the FBI "cleared" Abuela before the investigation was complete?

The investigation was complete.

Because the Justice Dept. refused to prosecute her or even take it to a grand jury?

For what crime? Being a Democrat?

Because Mueller's team is loaded with Hillary flacks?

TWO PEOPLE do not constitute loaded. On top of that when it was discovered, back in July they were let go from the investigation.

Maybe because the JD head under Obama met with the husband of a person under investigation--secretly (so they hoped!)

It was said by both that it was just to talk about personal things, like family. If you can prove something else then maybe you should contact the DOJ.

Do you want to dig a dipper hole? Digging a whole

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Guide
1.1.12  Dulay  replied to  Texan1211 @1.1    7 years ago

Except that what they actually want to do to the FBI and DOJ is to :corrupt, debase, debauch, defile, degrade, demean, deprave, pervert, stain, warp, sully and especially tarnish. The antonym to purge. 

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.1.13  Texan1211  replied to  Trout Giggles @1.1.10    7 years ago

Well, first off, I didn't say anything about deep state---and never have. Let's stick to what I wrote and not what you think I wrote.

When you can manage that, get back to me.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.1.14  Texan1211  replied to  Willjay9 @1.1.8    7 years ago

Because the agents did not recuse themselves from investigations regarding Trump or Hillary.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.1.15  Texan1211  replied to  cjcold @1.1.7    7 years ago

WTF does that have to do with the FBI?

Get back to me when you figure what the topic is.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.1.16  Texan1211  replied to  Willjay9 @1.1.9    7 years ago

Okay, point out anywhere I wrote I wanted the FBI cleared.

Geez louise, what the hell is wrong with y'all?

Let's stick to what I write. 

If y'all just want to make up shit, converse amongst yourselves and leave me the fuck alone.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.1.17  Texan1211  replied to  Galen Marvin Ross @1.1.11    7 years ago

Here, since you are not aware:

Senators: Comey may have cleared Clinton BEFORE investigation
https://www.conservativereview.com/articles/senators-comey-may...

Senators Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, and Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., say newly released transcripts from a federal watchdog agency indicate that Comey decided to draft a statement exonerating Clinton in May of 2016, before Clinton was interviewed by the FBI.
GOP chairmen: Comey may have cleared Clinton before ...
thehill.com/...comey-may-have-cleared-clinton-before-interviewing-her

GOP chairmen: Comey may have cleared Clinton before interviewing her. ... he also said he had decided to fire Comey before receiving Rosenstein’s May 9 memo.
Comey wrote draft exoneration of Clinton months before ...
www.cnn.com/2017/08/31/politics/comey-clinton-investigation/index.html

Sep 01, 2017 · Comey drafted Clinton exoneration before finishing ... much of the evidence by spring and it was becoming more clear that it was not likely to ...
BREAKING: Memos Reveal Comey Cleared Clinton BEFORE ...
thefreethoughtproject.com/comey-memos-reveal-hillary-cleared

BREAKING: Memos Reveal Comey Cleared Clinton BEFORE Interviewing Her & 17 Other Key Witnesses. Former FBI director James Comey's own memos reveal he exonerated Hillary Clinton of criminal wrongdoing BEFORE ever interviewing her and 17 other key witnesses.
GOP senators: Comey drafted statement clearing Clinton ...
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/08/31/fbi-comey-clinton-email...

Former FBI Director James Comey began drafting a statement rejecting the idea of criminal charges against Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton over her private email account about two months or more before Clinton was interviewed in the FBI probe, according to partial transcripts of interviews released Thursday by two Republican senators.
FBI Releases Proof: Comey Cleared Hillary Before Any ...
https://thepoliticalinsider.com/fbi-proof-james-comey-hllary-scam

New James Comey Hillary Clinton news proves that the former FBI Director cleared her from criminal wrongdoing before even investigating.
REPORT: James Comey Cleared Clinton in FBI Probe BEFORE ...
https://www.hannity.com/media-room/2017-08-31-report-james-comey...

Aug 31, 2017 · The former FBI chief drafted a statement exonerating Clinton months before interviewing her, other key witnesses.
FBI Admits Comey Cleared Clinton Before Interview
https://www.trunews.com/article/fbi-admits-comey-cleared-clinton...

The FBI released a draft Monday of then-Director James Comey’s letter clearing former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton of wrongdoing in connection with her use of ...
Trump rips ‘rigged system’ over claim Comey cleared ...
https://nypost.com/2017/09/01/trump-rips-rigged-system-over-report...

Trump’s latest rebuke followed a report from two GOP senators alleging that Comey was prepared to absolve Clinton before key interviews in the investigation were completed. The FBI was looking into Clinton’s use of a private email server containing classified information and her …
Memos reveal Comey cleared Clinton before ... - Sott.net
https://www.sott.net/article/360779-Memos-reveal-Comey-cleared...

Two U.S. Senators, Iowa Sen. Chuck Grassley and South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham, sent a letter to the FBI, which specifically noted that Comey's draft was prepared well before two Clinton aides, Cheryl Mills and Heather Samuelson, were given what Republicans deemed a "highly unusual" immunity deal with the U.S. Justice Department.
Related searches for comey cleared clinton before
comey and the clintons history
comey connected to clinton foundation

1
2
3
4
5

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.1.18  Texan1211  replied to  Galen Marvin Ross @1.1.11    7 years ago

And:

Special counsel team members donated to Dems, FEC ... - CNN
www.cnn.com/2017/06/12/politics/robert-mueller-donations-democrats...

Jun 13, 2017 · Washington (CNN)Three members of the legal team known to have been hired so far by special counsel Robert Mueller to handle the Russia investigation have given political donations almost exclusively to Democrats, according to a CNN analysis of Federal Election Commission records.
Mueller Hires Multiple Hillary Clinton Donors for …
freebeacon.com/politics/muellers...hillary-hillary-clinton-donors

Special counsel Robert Mueller has hired multiple donors who gave to Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign to join his team investigating President Donald Trump. Federal records show that three attorneys who Mueller hired have made political donations, mostly to Democrats, CNN reports.

NOT just two, and NOT let go.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.1.19  Texan1211  replied to  Dulay @1.1.12    7 years ago

Your rather dubious opinion.

 
 
 
Galen Marvin Ross
Sophomore Participates
1.1.20  seeder  Galen Marvin Ross  replied to  Texan1211 @1.1.18    7 years ago

Texan, do I really have to bring up that free beacon is a far right conservative site and, is prone to lying?

Besides, you are talking about three people, not the whole investigation, I'm sure Mueller supported the GOP and, donated to the GOP since he is a Republican, should he disqualify himself because he donated to the GOP or, is this just more bias on your part because you don't like "Dems" and, "libruls"?

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.1.21  Texan1211  replied to  Galen Marvin Ross @1.1.20    7 years ago

if you choose to ignore all the other sources, then that's on you.

We also checked Federal Election Commission filings.
Here’s what we found:
Six of the 15 lawyers have not made campaign contributions to any political campaigns at the federal level.
Among the lawyers who did make contributions, a total of $62,043 went to Democrats and $2,750 to Republicans, according to the special counsel’s office.
In terms of Clinton specifically, election filings indicate that three lawyers gave her 2016 presidential campaign a total of $700; and three gave a total of $18,100 to either her 2016 campaign or her 2008 run for the presidential nomination.

 
 
 
Galen Marvin Ross
Sophomore Participates
1.1.22  seeder  Galen Marvin Ross  replied to  Texan1211 @1.1.17    7 years ago

OK, now what you are showing me is news from CNN which you have said many times doesn't get the story right. You also show me things from Hannity and, other RW sites that clearly don't like Comey and, would love to discredit him simply because he is against Trump and, has said that Trump fired him to protect Flynn and, of course they would love to discredit Clinton simply because she is a Clinton. Try again.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.1.23  Texan1211  replied to  Galen Marvin Ross @1.1.22    7 years ago

Show ONE time I have ever said CNN doesn't ever get stories right. Do y'all just make shit up ALL the fucking time, or what?

 
 
 
Galen Marvin Ross
Sophomore Participates
1.1.24  seeder  Galen Marvin Ross  replied to  Texan1211 @1.1.21    7 years ago
We also checked Federal Election Commission filings.Here’s what we found:Six of the 15 lawyers have not made campaign contributions to any political campaigns at the federal level.Among the lawyers who did make contributions, a total of $62,043 went to Democrats and $2,750 to Republicans, according to the special counsel’s office.In terms of Clinton specifically, election filings indicate that three lawyers gave her 2016 presidential campaign a total of $700; and three gave a total of $18,100 to either her 2016 campaign or her 2008 run for the presidential nomination.

Oh wow!! Then let's just take them there Libruls out and, hang 'em from the nearest tree, how dare they as citizens of the United States have an opinion of who they like politically and, how dare they donate to any campaign!!! Really? Do I need to add a sarc tag to this? I hope not.

Texan, what these politicians are doing is nothing more than trying to subvert our legal system, they need to leave this alone and, let it play out, there is nothing wrong here in spite of what you and, others on the Right might think, except that we have politicians wanting to prove that the guy they wanted in the White House isn't a crook like the other guy, (Nixon), they wanted in there or, a traitor.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.1.25  Texan1211  replied to  Galen Marvin Ross @1.1.24    7 years ago

So lawyers involved in the case are perfectly okay donating to whoever they want, and you champion their right to say and support whoever they want, but then chastise politicians for expressing their opinion?

Not hypocritical in the LEAST, right?

SMDH

 
 
 
Galen Marvin Ross
Sophomore Participates
1.1.26  seeder  Galen Marvin Ross  replied to  Texan1211 @1.1.23    7 years ago
Show ONE time I have ever said CNN doesn't ever get stories right. Do y'all just make shit up ALL the fucking time, or what?

Are you saying that CNN does get story's right all the time then?

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Guide
1.1.27  Dulay  replied to  Texan1211 @1.1.19    7 years ago

As is your opinion of my opinion. 

 
 
 
Galen Marvin Ross
Sophomore Participates
1.1.28  seeder  Galen Marvin Ross  replied to  Texan1211 @1.1.25    7 years ago
but then chastise politicians for expressing their opinion? Not hypocritical in the LEAST, right?

When the politicians use their office and, position to try to undermine an investigation simply because they don't like the way it is going and, try to "put in tatters" an agency that is meant to protect us all, yes, it is my right to speak out against it. As far as the agents are concerned, if they don't bring their likes and, dislikes to the investigation which, I will admit, is probably what Skrok did and, why he is no longer a part of the Mueller investigation and, hasn't been since July.

 
 
 
Galen Marvin Ross
Sophomore Participates
1.1.29  seeder  Galen Marvin Ross  replied to  Dulay @1.1.27    7 years ago

Both of ya play nice or, I'll take your toys away. Wink

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.1.30  Texan1211  replied to  Galen Marvin Ross @1.1.28    7 years ago

Undermine what investigation? Mueller's investigation is independent of any FBI investigation, so what are referring to?

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.1.31  Texan1211  replied to  Galen Marvin Ross @1.1.26    7 years ago

What the fuck are you babbling on about CNN for??

WTF does CNN have to do with anything we were talking about--other than your lame-ass attempt to attack my sources instead of discussing what those sources said?

I am sure that CNN is like EVERY other news source in that it gets some things wrong. If you wish to dispute that what CNN reported in my source was wrong, go for it.  Otherwise, tell me how CNN became the topic.

 
 
 
Galen Marvin Ross
Sophomore Participates
1.1.32  seeder  Galen Marvin Ross  replied to  Texan1211 @1.1.30    7 years ago

This is the kind of sh!t I'm talking about.

 
 
 
Galen Marvin Ross
Sophomore Participates
1.1.33  seeder  Galen Marvin Ross  replied to  Texan1211 @1.1.31    7 years ago
If you wish to dispute that what CNN reported in my source was wrong, go for it.

You give me a link that I can go to and, I'll be happy to read it and, see what is there, however, the links that you provided aren't good links, I can't go to them.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.1.34  Texan1211  replied to  Galen Marvin Ross @1.1.32    7 years ago

Wow. So worked up over a no-power, first term Congressman nobody outside his freaking district even knew is going to undermine the great Mueller?

Surely you jest!

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.1.35  Texan1211  replied to  Galen Marvin Ross @1.1.33    7 years ago

So all of your bitching was over something you haven't even read?

Damn!

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
1.1.36  Trout Giggles  replied to  Texan1211 @1.1.13    7 years ago

When you figure out what I wrote then get back to me.

Paranoid much?

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
1.1.37  Trout Giggles  replied to  Texan1211 @1.1.23    7 years ago

You're losing it big time

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.1.38  Texan1211  replied to  Trout Giggles @1.1.37    7 years ago

Comment removed for CoC violation [ph] 

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.1.39  Texan1211  replied to  Trout Giggles @1.1.36    7 years ago

Not at all.

And I did notice you didn't provide one post where I have EVER said anything about a deep state. Why not?

But you keep on imagining what I write instead of actually READING what I wrote.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
1.1.40  Trout Giggles  replied to  Texan1211 @1.1.39    7 years ago

And you keep on imagining what you think I wrote.

bye

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
1.1.41  Trout Giggles  replied to  Texan1211 @1.1.38    7 years ago

I'm about sick of you and your petty insults.

Take it to somebody who may want to trade insults with you. I'm not interested

 
 
 
It Is ME
Masters Guide
1.1.42  It Is ME  replied to  Willjay9 @1.1.4    7 years ago
Wow, I guess there is no such thing as a good cop then huh?...

According to BLM...and others....there aren't.

Why would you now assume ALL are ?

 
 
 
It Is ME
Masters Guide
1.1.43  It Is ME  replied to  Texan1211 @1.1.31    7 years ago
What the fuck are you babbling on about CNN for??

Deflection Factors just kicked in......AGAIN !

10. "The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition."

Those types don't care what the subject really is.

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Guide
1.1.44  Dulay  replied to  Galen Marvin Ross @1.1.29    7 years ago
Both of ya play nice or, I'll take your toys away.

That WAS me being nice. 

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Guide
1.1.45  Dulay  replied to  Texan1211 @1.1.30    7 years ago
Mueller's investigation is independent of any FBI investigation, so what are referring to?

Really? Are you claiming that the IG has no authority to investigate Mueller's investigation? If so, please post a link to the regulation that prohibits it. 

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
1.1.46  Trout Giggles  replied to  Dulay @1.1.44    7 years ago

I need to follow you around. I'm not being nice and I don't give a shit

 
 
 
Rex Block
Freshman Silent
1.1.47  Rex Block  replied to  cjcold @1.1.7    7 years ago
So how many times did the GOP investigate Hillary and find nothing?

She never cooperated with the investigators, lying, deflecting, and refusing to answer the questions. They finally had to give up.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
1.2  Tessylo  replied to  Galen Marvin Ross @1    7 years ago

Sounds like Donald Rump wants to get rid of all the agencies investigating him.  He's such a dumb fuck.  

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
2  Sparty On    7 years ago

In my experiences through work, friends, associations and travel i've had many dealings with government employees and while i've had some good experiences i found most of them to be underwhelming in the intelligence department.   Not sure why that is since i know some of the selection processes and training many of them go through is rather rigorous.

Best explanation i can give you is what friend said when he became a congressmen.   He told me:

You know, i came here with the best of intentions, to right all of the wrongs i could and fix problems but you know what?   They get you, no matter how principled you are, they get you.   To "get along" and have any hope in hell of getting something good done you have to "go along."

The whole system is corrupt in that regard and i think that corruption tends to extend it's noodly appendages into all facets of government.

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
2.1  cjcold  replied to  Sparty On @2    7 years ago

Especially when multinational corporations are involved. Citizens United guaranteed ultimate corruption.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
2.1.1  Texan1211  replied to  cjcold @2.1    7 years ago

If CU was the big, bad wolf like y'all think, wouldn't Abuela be President after outspending Trump significantly?

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
2.1.2  cjcold  replied to  Texan1211 @2.1.1    7 years ago

Thirty+ years of  far right wing propaganda, innuendo and lies plus Russian interference are why Hillary lost the election.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
2.1.3  Tessylo  replied to  cjcold @2.1.2    7 years ago
"Thirty+ years of  far right wing propaganda, innuendo and lies plus Russian interference are why Hillary lost the election."

And that's the absolute truth.  Thank you!

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
2.1.4  Texan1211  replied to  cjcold @2.1.2    7 years ago

But, but, but, Cu means that whoever spends the most always wins, right?

She lost because enough of America didn't trust her. That, and she ran a shitty campaign.

 
 
 
Galen Marvin Ross
Sophomore Participates
2.2  seeder  Galen Marvin Ross  replied to  Sparty On @2    7 years ago

Two other politicians said pretty much the same thing after they left office, John Boehner and, Barack Obama.

 
 
 
Dean Moriarty
Professor Quiet
3  Dean Moriarty    7 years ago

It’s not like the FBI doesn’t have a long history of deep state corrupt unconstitutional activity. Look at how long J Edgar Hoover was in power there and what we now know about his deep state activities.

You can’t drain the swamp without a purge. 

 
 
 
Galen Marvin Ross
Sophomore Participates
3.1  seeder  Galen Marvin Ross  replied to  Dean Moriarty @3    7 years ago

Is J. Edgar Hoover still in charge at the FBI? I thought it was someone who was appointed by a Republican that was in charge there now. Is the "deep state" coming from the Trump White House? Wow, the Democrats better do something about that.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
3.2  Trout Giggles  replied to  Dean Moriarty @3    7 years ago

J Edgar was so virulently anti-communist there is no way you can call him a liberal. So I guess this "deep state" shit can come from any where, eh? Like far right wing conservatives maybe?

 
 
 
Dean Moriarty
Professor Quiet
3.2.1  Dean Moriarty  replied to  Trout Giggles @3.2    7 years ago

Yes the deep state has infected both parties. Trump not only had to beat the Dems but also the deep state Republicans like Jeb. The deep state didn’t die when Hoover did. 

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
3.2.2  Trout Giggles  replied to  Dean Moriarty @3.2.1    7 years ago

thank-you

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
4  Sean Treacy    7 years ago

The FBI  needs to be above politics. 

It's not.   

 
 
 
sixpick
Professor Quiet
6  sixpick    7 years ago

I misread it.  I thought they wanted to combine them and we already know they are combined with Comey taking his orders from Lynch.

The people working for the FBI overall are good people, but the top brass are political hacks or just plain out Lefties and very corrupt.  Why else would they and they alone have to handle things like Hillary's matter as they called it?

 
 
 
Galen Marvin Ross
Sophomore Participates
6.1  seeder  Galen Marvin Ross  replied to  sixpick @6    7 years ago
but the top brass are political hacks or just plain out Lefties and very corrupt.

Have you ever tried looking the "top brass" at the FBI up at all to see if you can back up what you are saying in your post? No, of course not, I did a little search and, this is what I found.

He's a Republican.

https://www.biography.com/people/christopher-wray-071417?_escaped_fragment_=#!

He's a Democrat and, is under Wray.

Mr. Bowdich doesn't have his political affiliation listed in his bio, (commendable), but, he has served in four administrations and, until the middle of the Obama administration was a field agent handling gangs in California.

James Brien Comey Jr. (born December 14, 1960) is an American lawyer who served as the seventh Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) from September 4, 2013 until his dismissal on May 9, 2017.[2] Comey was a registered Republican for most of his life, but has recently described himself as unaffiliated .[3]

I can't blame him, after the past year I'd call myself unaffiliated if my life long party had treated me the same.

Robert Swan Mueller III (/ˈmʌlər/; born August 7, 1944) is an American lawyer and civil servant who was the sixth Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation from 2001 to 2013. A Republican, he was appointed by President George W. Bush and his original ten-year term was given a two-year extension by President Barack Obama, making him the longest-serving FBI director since J. Edgar Hoover. He is currently head of the Special Counsel investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections.

So, if the leadership at the FBI are all "lefties" as you put it, why aren't they all Democrats or, worse, (gasp) progressives? You really need to quit listening to the crap that comes out of the RW sites, it's damaging your brain.

 
 

Who is online

Bob Nelson
Just Jim NC TttH
Vic Eldred
evilone


187 visitors