╌>

TX Paper Erases Son’s Husband from Mom’s Obituary: It’s “Contrary to God’s Word”

  

Category:  Religion & Ethics

Via:  hal-a-lujah  •  6 years ago  •  10 comments

TX Paper Erases Son’s Husband from Mom’s Obituary: It’s “Contrary to God’s Word”

Source

When a woman named Brenda Light passed away last month, her son Barry Giles sent an obituary to a local Texas newspaper, the Olton Enterprise.

As with any obituary, it mentioned her still-living family members and their spouses, saying in this case, “Those left to cherish her memory include her son, Barry Giles and his husband, John Gambill of Dallas.” When the piece was published, however, John Gambill‘s name was nowhere to be found.

That’s because the paper’s publisher, Phillip Hamilton, happens to be a Baptist pastor who thinks same-sex marriages are an abomination.

[Hamilton] declined an interview but said in a statement, “It is my religious conviction that a male cannot have a husband. It is also my belief that to publish anything contrary to God’s Word on this issue would be to publish something in the newspaper that is not true.”

Hamilton says “the newspaper respects the first amendment rights of those who express such opinions. The newspaper’s decision to edit the obituary is both ethical and lawful. It would be unethical to publish a news item that is known by the editor to be false. Based on the truth found in the Word of God, I could not in good conscience identify Mr. Gamabill as the husband of Mr. Giles.“

See everybody? He wasn’t purposely wiping away the existence of Gambill. He was just fact-checking.

Giles, naturally, is upset. No other newspaper he sent that obituary to took out his spouse’s name. Just that one.

It wiped John completely off the picture like he didn’t exist,” Giles 

It’s hard to argue the newspaper did anything legally wrong. Omitting information deemed unnecessary or untrue isn’t the same thing as purposely publishing false information. But ethically, what Hamilton did was atrocious. By removing Gambill’s name, he was arguably rewriting the life story of a woman who just died. Giles and Gambill say they spent a lot of time with Giles’ mother, going on family trips together and caring for her later in life.

Refusing to acknowledge his existence because of Jesus doesn’t take away from the fact that Gambill loved her and cared for her as if she were his own mother.

Leave it to a Christian to ignore love in the name of hate.


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
1  seeder  Hal A. Lujah    6 years ago

This Christian bigot insists on having the last word of a bigoted conversation.

 
 
 
Randy
Sophomore Quiet
1.1  Randy  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @1    6 years ago

That's nauseatingly wrong! What a sick bigot to do something like that. It's none of his business and not his right. Gay marriage is legal and if he doesn't want to publish the husband's name then he shouldn't publish the married spouses names of anyone in any of the obits!

He is not a Christian, because he missed the teachings of love and learned bigotry from someone who was not Christ.

 
 
 
epistte
Junior Participates
1.1.2  epistte  replied to    6 years ago
However, he is the publisher of the paper so it is absolutely his right.

It is not his right to edit facts to conform to his religious beliefs.  Can he also edit the police reports, court proceedings or real estate transfers because of his beliefs? If he is the newspaper of record they must be printed as they are submitted. 

Let him write a newspaper editorial about LGBT marriage if he has a problem, but he isn't to be editing others obituaries because of his religious beliefs.  Most obituaries longer than 2 paragraphs are paid, so he cannot edit that submission. 

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
1.2  Greg Jones  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @1    6 years ago

There they go...the usual Christian bashing bigots calling everyone else bigots. Who the fuk cares about some dude's "husband", or why he needs to be mentioned at all. Such an unimportant tale of woe....

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
1.2.1  seeder  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Greg Jones @1.2    6 years ago

Who cares if you get omitted from your mom’s obituary?  It doesn’t get much more cowardly than this.

 
 
 
Phoenyx13
Sophomore Silent
1.2.2  Phoenyx13  replied to  Greg Jones @1.2    6 years ago
Who the fuk cares about some dude's "husband", or why he needs to be mentioned at all.

i would suspect they care since, legally, John (the guy who was omitted) is family whether the religious like it or not.

 
 
 
Gordy327
Professor Guide
1.2.3  Gordy327  replied to  Greg Jones @1.2    6 years ago
calling everyone else bigots.

If the shoe fits!

 
 
 
epistte
Junior Participates
1.2.4  epistte  replied to  Greg Jones @1.2    6 years ago
There they go...the usual Christian bashing bigots calling everyone else bigots.

He is changing the facts of other peoples lives according to his religious beliefs. That is bigotry.  These people we not asking for his religious approval when they submitted that obituary. He chose to disgracefully inject his religious beliefs into the lives of others at a very solemn time. He deserves the scorn that he is receiving.

 
 

Who is online






483 visitors