'DEPLORABLE': NY Daily News' Cover Ties Ivanka To Gaza Violence "Daddy's Little Ghoul"
The New York Daily News is experiencing backlash in response to the release of its new cover, which features a smiling Ivanka Trump gesturing to a photoshopped-in image of an injured Palestinian from the violence on the Gaza strip.
On Monday, in response to the ceremony for the opening of the new U.S. embassy in Jerusalem, Hamas-led Palestinian protesters rioted at the Israel-Gaza border, prompting the Israel Defense Forces to strike a number of Hamas targets. According to the Hamas-run health ministry, dozens of Palestinians were killed as a result of the IDF's response. Among those killed were three terrorists who tried to plant a bomb on the border.
In its promotion of an early look at its Tuesday cover on Twitter, the Daily News provided a one-word comment that aptly described its own cover: "Deplorable."
The headline reads, "Daddy's Little Ghoul: 55 slaughtered in Gaza, but Ivanka all smiles at Jerusalem embassy unveil."
If the Daily News was trying to cause a stir, it certainly succeeded.
May 15, 2018, 3:34PM ... Special for John Russell who complained that I didn't include a photo:
https://thenewstalkers.com/discussion/image/discussion_image/39845/larger/_v=1526399471
Article is LOCKED by author/seeder
Who is online
405 visitors
I didn't know that anyone who trashed the Rump family was 'left wing media'
FAKE NEWS! FAKE NEWS!
Don't you think photoshopping a picture to make it look like what you want your news story to be about is wrong?
I think the title is hilarious 'Daddie's little ghoul'
Don't you think the countless photoshopped memes - the vicious and despicable lies - that are posted about the Obamas and all things Clinton - don't you think that is wrong?
Before I seeded this article, I read many others. They were all from left-wing media and agreed with NY Daily News. Imagine if right wing media had done sloppy, deceptive "reporting" like this if Obama had had the balls to move the embassy and sent Michelle Obama as his representative. At a minimum, right wing media would have been called misogynistic, Islamophobic, and racist.
Yes I do, but you did not answer my question.
Stop trolling my seed with off-topic comments.
That's all the 'right wing' media has.
(Deleted, CoC {SP}) No photoshopping involved. The "photoshopped" comment came from the Daily Wire article. It's their bad description, not Spike's.
Stop trolling my seed.
It's a violation of journalistic ethics … on that we can agree.
… but let us not be selectively indignant … and hypocritical.
There are many right-wing rags … and … when I attack any specific source, I always give the particulars in terms of "who," and "why."
Most of those who attack sources in these threads, do so with one-liner pieces of demagoguery … like parrots.
Just look around this thread and see.
And the Daily Wire, which has a right to be critical on the Daily News cover … IS NO ROLE MODEL FOR JOURNALISTIC ETHICS.
I.E. False stories
According to Snopes , "DailyWire.com has a tendency to share stories that are taken out of context or not verified." [11] Among the falsehoods published on the Daily Wire include “leftists” digging up Confederate graves, Democratic congresspeople refusing to stand for a fallen Navy SEAL’s widow, and Harvard University holding segregated commencement ceremonies. [11]
FactCheck.Org found that the Daily Wire was the source of a false story which credited Housing and Urban Development Secretary Ben Carson with finding over $500 billion in accounting errors made by the Obama administration. According to FactCheck.Org found that the errors were discovered and published by HUD’s independent inspector general before Carson became secretary. [12]
The Daily Wire has published a number of articles which cast doubt that climate change is occurring and that humans contribute to climate change. Experts have described the articles as inaccurate and misleading
___________________________________________________
So let us be fair and balanced (to coin a phrase).
"Photoshopped" connotes an intention to deceive, the newspaper cover doesn't show that. It is more like an editorial comment that Ivanka was laughing it up in Jerusalem while hundreds of people were being killed or wounded in Gaza.
It is a fair if hard editorial, but I am surprised the New York Daily News would put this on the front page.
Meanwhile Jared was blaming the Palestinians for the fact that Israeli snipers were murdering them. He seemed oblivious to the fact that his father in law's decision to relocate the embassy to disputed territory was the cause of the current protests.
I bet you blame the battered wife for her beating don't you?
"If she would just did what her abuser wanted, she wouldn't have gotten beat."
False equivalency. And a pretty stupid one.
Storming a national border with STATED purpose of murdering Jews is likely to get those monsters shot.
Did it escape you and the NY Daily News that she and hundreds of others were celebrating the long-promised opening of the US Embassy in Jerusalem?
I saw it as finally fulfilling one of President Bill Clintons ......... "Legacy's" ?
Does it escape you that while she was "celebrating" hundreds of people were being killed or wounded not that far away, in a protest to the embassy opening?
Israel dropped flyers into Palestine warning Hamas to stay away from the fence and not cause trouble. As usual, terrorist Hamas didn't listen. Thousands threatened the border and now Hamas supporters (including some NT people) are whining that Hamas terrorists again put their own women and children in danger as they attacked Israel.
By the way ... left wing media tried to make it sound like Hamas' violence/rioting was simply peaceful protest. Go figger.
She was not. That's an obvious lie. She was celebrating the opening of the new embassy. I have to believe you know that.
Nope …
Every president since 1995 -- Presidents Clinton, Bush and Obama -- has declined to move the embassy, citing national security interests. Every six months, the President has used the presidential waiver to circumvent the embassy move.
Cowards all.
The Middle East is what it is, and no matter how nice one wants to be to them, they'll stab you in the back quicker than you can say "Sorry" !
If that's the case … and I believe that it is …
WTF is Trump doing pouring gasoline on an inevitable, eternally burning tinder box?
HINT: Sheldon Adelson and $ 30 million to Trump!
Can't have it both ways my friend.
Specific sources and text please.
That's disingenuous.
Every other nation gets to pick their capital. Holding Israel to a different standard is a firm of antisemitism.
Do some research on "Pallywood". There are hundreds of examples.
That newspaper was reaching pretty hard core deep to come up with such stupidity and fake, as well.
Magnolia the newspaper cover is not "fake news". It does not claim to be showing Ivanka laughing at the Palestinians.
The photo at the top right is an insert. It is not "photoshopped". The photo isnt trying to convince you that Ivanka is pointing at the photo. It is more of an editorial, like you would see in an editorial cartoon.
The seeder should have posted the image of the cover of the paper, and maybe some of this confusion could have been avoided.
I did. It's not my fault that the cover photo I included from the NY Daily News when I seeded this article only appears on NT's front page and not here as well.
You have to put it in both places if you want it in both places.
I didn't know that. I edited my intro a few minutes ago, but all that was added was a link to the photo. Thanks for your help.
And yet, it's obvious what the attempt was by merging 2 pictures together making a visual statement. Even you aren't that obtuse.
As I said, I would say the mixing of the two photos is an editorial statement, and no it is not meant to flatter Ivanka Trump.
But neither is it intended to fool people into thinking she was actually literally laughing at the Palestinians.
Meh, what do your expect from a rag like this paper? Apparently disingenuous left wing hatred is all they got when it comes to the Trumps.
Sells well to the worker drones in the hive though. I mean look at them slobbering all over it here.
Direct contrast to the boot licking he gets from Fox, but I am sure you see that source as fair and balanced something they even were forced to distance themselves from. I try my best to get informed from various outlets finding the truth in between, however I refuse to be ladled propaganda by fox.
Well according to this Harvard study, when it comes to positive and negative reporting, Fox is about as close to "neutral" as one can get. Whatever that means.
Network reporting Positive vs Negative
Fox was damn near 50-50 a year ago ..... leaning slightly towards the negative. The others? Not even close.
The news is the news but there ain't no way Trumps was honestly 90+% negative.
No way.
Donald Trump is the most unqualified and dishonest president in the history of this country. Why on earth would you expect "50-50" positive and negative media coverage?
Objectively, very little of it should be positive.
Who said i did? Like i said, the news is the news.
That said, your name and objectivity do not really fit together well John.
Now there's a fine example of objective reporting.
Off topic.
Please don't reply to off topic comments. Thanks.
He is the one who brought up the media coverage of trump, but I am off topic? rofl.
You know John, as one of the most active complainers about off topic posts, you sure post a lot of off topic posts.
That said i didn't bring up Donald Trump. You did. I brought up Trumps, of which Ivanka is one.
You did notice the article was about Ivanka Trump right?
Objectivity has nothing to do with positive or negative. The problem is, journalism has ceased to exist for the most part in the U.S., now it is all Editorial and Opinion shaped to fit the ideology of who is reporting it.
Not exactly, Maggie. The place for such an item is on an editorial or op-ed page where it is clearly posted as an opinion, that, rather than on a front page which ethically should be reserved for actual "news".
Take it from a retired newspaper editor, and also, a published author of political editorial commentary.
Allegedly. Even if true, guess how it could have been avoided? Stay away from Israel's border and stop lobbing bombs over the fence. Simple.
That's right. People who support Israel are happy at this acknowledgment of their sovereignty. Those whose primarily goal in this world is to destroy Israel are understandably upset. Too bad, losers!
So when trump is defeated in the next election you will become a complacent loser and no matter what happened on our soil you would simple stand by and become an audience if told to sit down and shut up.
Please read the seeded article and stay on topic. It is not about the 2020 presidential election and other NewsTalkers members. Thank you.
Like you have been, let's say, since November 2016? LOL.
This article is totally without merit.
Ivanka. Nice T&A. Her best asset except for the access to wealth of course.
We all know how the left hates a smart white female that doesn't wear a pussy hat.
Thanks for confirming that.
What does white have to do with it? Deleted, Skirting {SP}
Smart?
White?
Nice T&A.
Removed for context
If it makes it better the left hates a smart BLACK women that doesn't toe the line either.
Nice try John Russell trying to call someone a racist to cover for a misogynist statement by one of your own.
Deleted, CoC {SP}
You seem to think that white women like Ivanka Trump get some sort of short end of the stick. Probably white men too.
The right makes disparaging remarks about "liberal" women all the time.
Ivanka looks like a movie star. That's just the way it is.
Too bad she's a white collar criminal.
So, that excuses your misogyny?
Removed for context
This from the person who thinks "Uncle Tom" is an appropriate term.
I wish all criminals had been convicted.
Deleted CoC {SP}
Sadly, Hillary is still free.
Ivanka was sued several times for ripping off other people's designs in her clothing and shoe company.
She settled so she wouldn't have to go to court.
They'll close in on her sooner or later.
Ivanka ’s signature real estate deals were disasters linked ...
Ivanka ’s signature real estate deals were disasters linked to drug cartels and money laundering The president’s daughter has been at the center of a pair of the presidential projects tied most closely to grand corruption.
Ivanka Trump Co. Hit with Subpoena For Money Laundering ...
Turns out, the Commercial Bank of Dubai has now subpoenaed Ivanka Trump’s diamond jewelry line, with the underlying reason being that the diamonds were being used in a $100,000,000 money laundering scheme, according to a GQ report.
Why settle and pay them if she is so innocent?
Removed for context
She also lied about it. Said that she was not part of design, then was caught saying that she oversees every design.
Author called off topic {SP}
Author called off topic {SP}
Deleted, Skirting {SP}
Author called off topic {SP}
Removed for context
Removed for context
Removed for context
No Value "BF"
That type of posting utilizes too much bandwidth.
TESSY THAT"S ENOUGH! I've reported all of your OFF TOPIC comments.
MAGS and TEXAN - I've reported yours, too. You're falling for the bait.
ALL OF YOU --- Discuss the seeded topic and not Ivanka's breasts!!
Removed for context {SP}
Here's a funny
I wonder when Jared plans to bring peace to the middle east? What's taking him so long?
The check hasn't cleared.
Locked until the seeder can be present to try to moderate this... {SP}
I'm not sure why you locked my seed, SP. Aren't seeders allowed to tend to personal matters, have dinner, and sleep?
One more thing - When users visit seeds and find inappropriate comments, they're supposed to report them to the moderators for review. It's safe to assume that's why you've been active on this seed. As the seeder, I cannot moderate the way you can.
Define absence. You are going overboard on this stuff SP.
That's what I'd like to know. I was "absent" for approximately 12 hours or less. If users had problems with someone's comments, all they had to do was report the comments. As a seeder, I can't delete CoC violations and there have been plenty of them on this seed so other than playing "daddy" by warning people, I don't know how the heck I'm supposed to "moderate".
As a relatively new NT member, it's difficult for me to put "overboard" into NT's historical perspective. What I do know is that SP targeted my seed and doesn't lock others' seeds as quickly as he locked mine. I'm not "whining" or complaining ... it is what it is, I suppose.
Perrie has repeatedly defined absence as anything over 6-8 hours. I don't see how anybody has missed that at this point. Especially considering she has directly informed pretty much all of you time and again. However, it is also a mods discretion if it falls under that 6-8 hours if they feel the article is devolving, which is pretty easy to assert when you see the flagged comments start to pile up. Additionally, if an author posts and runs, and we see it, we will always lock that article pending the author's return.
This is a big reason why i don't bother posting articles anymore.
I think the lock/unlock thing is a mistake for more than one reason. I see some people use it in attempt to control the conversations. Others like me don't have time to constantly patrol all the dumbass crackposterry that tends to happen here. So people don't post articles ..... which is counter to what Perrie is trying to do here.
I say let the report feature work. If posts are out of bounds let people report it. When people are a continual problem give them the broom.
Problem fixed.
I've never seen her say this. Perhaps it's because I don't live on NewsTalkers as others do.
Well, that explains why this seed was locked!
I didn't "post and run". I was actively commenting and reporting CoC violations yesterday as often as I could. But even I, as a seeder, should be allowed to spend some time with my family, eat, and sleep, don't you think? Moderators can stay up all night being nannies if they wish. As a seeder, I expect NT users to behave themselves and don't see a need to lock my seeds.
That isn't realistic. Since it takes but a single click, and in theory you would want to participate in your own article, so locking it when you aren't around seems like a non issue. Plus, it's the rules, and IIRC, was also voted in by the community, but regardless, also happens to be eminently practical.
If Trump supporters would even bother to listen to the idiotic "speech" Ivanka gave, she totally flubbed our country name, she said "The United States ON America".
These people are totally incompetent and there is no possible way that the Trump name should be on our Embassy, it is the AMERICAN EMBASSY, not a Trump property.
Is that the best you've got? At least she didn't announce that there are 57 US states or ask a paralyzed man in a wheelchair to stand up!
That's all you got on President Obama? ( Author called off topic {SP} )
Author called off topic {SP}
In order to abide by Split Personality's rules for my seed, I will lock this seed until after I spend time with my family, have dinner, and sleep. See you all tomorrow.
Hi Jasper,
They are not SP rules but the site rules. Otherwise, in your absence, your seed had to be monitored by the mods or have the potential of going off the rails. That is why we ask you to lock them if you are going to be away for long periods of time. It is as much for your protection as it is to aid in moderation.
Dineen Borelli: