╌>

Indiana's Mike Pence: 'We're Not Going to Change the Law'

  

Category:  Religion & Ethics

Via:  xxjefferson51  •  10 years ago  •  10 comments

Indiana's Mike Pence: 'We're Not Going to Change the Law'

Indiana has been under an "avalanche of intolerance" from people opposed to the state's new religious freedom restoration law, said Gov. Mike Pence Sunday, but he supports the law and insisted that it will not be changed.

"I'm determined to clarify this," the Republican governor, who signed the controversial bill into law last week, told ABC "This Week" host George Stephanopoulos. "This is about protecting the religious liberty of people of faith and families of faith across this country."

The federal religious freedom act was signed into law more than 20 years ago by then-President Bill Clinton to layout a framework for ensuring that scrutiny is given when government action impinges upon Americans' religious activities, Pence pointed out, saying that further, his state's new law is the same version that President Barack Obama himself voted for while he was a state senator in Illinois.


"I was proud to sign it into law last week," Pence said.

But he denied that the law's purpose is to discriminate against the LGBT community, but rather to "empower individuals when they believe that the actions of government impinge on their constitutional [rights of] freedom of religion.

After Obamacare and cases like the one filed by the craft store giant Hobby Lobby concerning a federal law requiring it provide contraception coverage in its employees' insurance policies, "a lot of people...feel their freedom is being impinged upon," Pence said. "This is not about discrimination. This is about empowering people on government overreach."


Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/mike-pence-not-changing-gay/2015/03/29/id/635117/#ixzz3Vo6anc8Z

Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
link   seeder  XXJefferson51    10 years ago

"There's been shameless rhetoric about my state and about this law and about its intention," said Pence. "People are trying to make it about one particular issue, and now you're doing that as well."

Indiana's new law echoes the federal religious freedom restoration act, he continued, and does not apply to "disputes between individuals unless government action is involved."

Further, Pence pointed out, in more than 20 years, "the religious freedom restoration act has never been used to undermine anti-discrimination laws in the country."

Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
link   seeder  XXJefferson51    10 years ago

The law means, Pence said, if there is an action or law that individuals believe infringes on freedom of religion, "they have the opportunity to go the court, go the court and the court would evaluate the circumstances under the standards articulated in this act. That's all it is."

And the headlines that say Indiana is now "licensed to discriminate," Pence said, are a "red herring" that he finds "deeply troubling ... to millions of Americans, and frankly, people all across the state of Indiana, who feel troubled about government overreach."


Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
link   Sean Treacy    10 years ago

Nor should they. Just because some idiots have no idea what they are protesting about is no reason to change a law that has been adopted by the majority of the states and the federal government.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
link   seeder  XXJefferson51    10 years ago

Of these kind of laws get repealed, the 1st amendment regarding religious freedom will be largely shredded which is the point of the secular progressive left, to ban religion outright and any expression of it should they gain the political position to do it.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
link   Sean Treacy    10 years ago

Democrats just hate the first amendment in general.

 
 
 
sixpick
Professor Quiet
link   sixpick    10 years ago

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
link   seeder  XXJefferson51    10 years ago

that is the whole point of the objection to religious freedom. It is a way for the left to boo God.

 
 
 
sixpick
Professor Quiet
link   sixpick    10 years ago

Well Jefferson, my faith is very personal to me and I respect anyone else to have a personal relationship as well. There's not a single person in this world who is going to take my last breath for me.

Not all Democrats are like the handful of Liberals on here, but the party has been highjacked.

I can't say much more for the Republicans either.

It's the government against the people these days.

 
 
 
Randy
Sophomore Quiet
link   Randy    10 years ago

Oh come now Six. No one is trying to take your faith away and you know it. The very idea is absurd. All we are trying to do is to make sure you don't try to make others follow your faith. Or others to be forcee to follow another faith. Laws that put a religious test on them o exactly that and are un-American and unConstitutional. Gay marriage and relationships are against you faith. Fine. But that does not give you and anyone else to make laws against them just because they're against your faith.

Being an atheist I have no problem with gay marriage. Would you try to force me to change that just because your faith is against it?

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
link   seeder  XXJefferson51    10 years ago

Youve probably heard by now about Indianas horrible new anti-gay law.

That would be the one signed by Republican Gov. Mike Pence, allowing religious people to exempt themselves from any generally applicable law they feel like and permitting businesses to discriminate against gays.

No shoes, no shirt, no heterosexuality, no service.

Celebrities and all right-thinking people are boycotting the new hate state over its discriminatory return to the dark ages. Theres just one problem: the law doesnt say any of these things.

Indianas Religious Freedom Restoration Act doesnt give blanket permission to businesses to deny service to gays or anyone else. (If a business truly wants to avoid serving sinners, it will have zero customers.) It doesnt mention sexual orientation at all.

What it does say is that government entities in the state may substantially burden a persons exercise of religion only in the furtherance of a compelling government interest and using the least restrictive means of furthering that compelling government interest.

 
 

Who is online

zuksam


38 visitors