╌>

Cohen Pleads Guilty To Paying Off Porn Star On Trump's Behalf

  

Category:  News & Politics

By:  johnrussell  •  6 years ago  •  513 comments

Cohen Pleads Guilty To Paying Off Porn Star On Trump's Behalf

Trump's lawyer, Michael Cohen, has plead guilty this afternoon, in a Manhattan court, to illegal payments to a porn star on behalf of a "presidential candidate" during the 2016 election, to keep her quiet. 

The "presidential candidate" is Donald J Trump. 

Potentially an extremely serious development for the Trump presidency. 

Good. 


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1  author  JohnRussell    6 years ago

Awaiting the Trump spin. 

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Expert
1.3  Krishna  replied to  JohnRussell @1    6 years ago
Awaiting the Trump spin. 

Its already begun. Actually the way they are attenpting to spin it is by avoiding mentioning it. And by creating distractions.

As I mentioned, I regularly watch the news on MSNBC and Fox. Tuesday night  I flipped back and for between those two channels-- I was curious as to how they'd cover the story. (Actually the two stories-- Cohen and Manafort!). Fox covered it by not mentioning it. Instead they showed Trump's speech which was pretty much his usual speech. Later I checked again-- Fox coverage was all about Hillary. (I got the impression that Hannity feels she's a terrible threat because he thinks she still holds a powerful position in the government that she's still in office!). Lots of coverage of Hillary on Fox this important news day! (Well, they also obsessed about Obama for a bit as well).

My guess is that they'll eventually find a way to spin Tuesday's 2 stories of Republican guilt.

 
 
 
321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu
Sophomore Guide
1.3.1  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu   replied to  Krishna @1.3    6 years ago
My guess is that they'll eventually find a way to spin Tuesday's 2 stories

Yep they're buying time till trump figures out what to tell them to do and say.

Its not truth till trump says so now. 

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Expert
1.3.2  Krishna  replied to  Krishna @1.3    6 years ago

My guess is that they'll eventually find a way to spin Tuesday's 2 stories of Republican guilt.

Actually there were 3 of Trump supporters in the news for wrongdoing--on the same day-- but the two bigger stories distracted us from another one-- that's three of Trump's supporters in one day! 8/21/2018:

GOP Rep. Duncan Hunter, wife indicted for allegedly misusing campaign funds

Rep.  Duncan Hunter  (R-Calif.) and his wife, Margaret, were indicted Tuesday after being charged with misusing at least $250,000 in campaign funds for personal expenses, the Department of Justice (DOJ) announced.

The indictment quickly led to Hunter being dropped from his position on several House committees, with Speaker  Paul Ryan  (R-Wis.) calling the charges against the three-term GOP lawmaker "deeply serious."

The California Republican is accused of using the funds to purchase trips to Italy and Hawaii, pay for his family's dental work, his children's tuition and international travel for nearly a dozen relatives, according to the DOJ. Thousands were also spent on "fast food, movie tickets, golf outings, video games, coffee, groceries, home utilities, and expensive meals."

Hunter allegedly falsified campaign records filed to the Federal Election Commission (FEC) to conceal the purchases by mischaracterizing the expenses as "'campaign travel,' 'dinner with volunteers/contributors,' 'toy drives,' 'teacher/parent and supporter events,' 'gift cards' for charitable donations, and 'gift basket items,' among other false descriptions," the DOJ said.

(More details HERE )

And this part is interesting:

Hunter,  garnered attention by becoming the second member of Congress to endorse  President Trump 's White House bid.

(Trump has an unusual concept of what it means to "Drain the Swamp")

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Expert
1.3.3  Krishna  replied to  Krishna @1.3.2    6 years ago
he second member of Congress to endorse  President Trump

Anyone know who the first member of Congress to endorse Trump was? And anything about him?

If you're curious-- here's the story.

 
 
 
321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu
Sophomore Guide
1.3.4  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu   replied to  Krishna @1.3.2    6 years ago
- but the two bigger stories distracted us from another one-- that's three of Trump's supporters in one day! 8/21/2018:

Three strikes yur out. trump's promise of "The Best of The Best" really is a myth busted. 

Draining the swamp sure has taken on a new meaning. 

 
 
 
321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu
Sophomore Guide
1.3.5  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu   replied to  Krishna @1.3.3    6 years ago
  • Rep. Chris Collins, a New York Republican, was arrested by the FBI and charged with securities fraud.
  • Federal prosecutors say Collins engaged in insider trading of the stock of Innate Immunotherapeutics, an Australian biotech company for which Collins was a board member.
  • A congressional ethics report in 2017 found that the congressman was able to buy discounted Innate stock that was not available to the public.

Rep. Chris Collins, a New York Republican, was arrested Wednesday by the FBI and indicted on allegations of securities fraud.

"While his guilt or innocence is a question for the courts to settle, the allegations against Rep. Collins demand a prompt and thorough investigation by the House Ethics Committee," Ryan said in a statement. "Insider trading is a clear violation of the public trust. Until this matter is settled, Rep. Collins will not be serving on the House Energy and Commerce Committee."

Collins' stock-trading activities came under scrutiny last year when it was revealed that the congressman recommended Innate to several colleagues, including Tom Price, the former secretary of health and human services. Collins was a board member of the company and was Innate's second-largest shareholder as of June 2017.

In October, the Office of Congressional Ethics determined that Collins might have violated House rules and federal law with his trading activities.

"Representative Collins may have also purchased discounted Innate stock that was not available to the public and that was offered to him based on his status as a Member of the House of Representatives," the report said. "If Representative Collins purchased discounted stock that was not available to the public and that was offered to him based on his status as a Member of the House of Representatives, then he may have violated House rules, standards of conduct, and federal law."

More of   "The Best of The Best !"

sarc !

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
1.3.6  Tessylo  replied to  Krishna @1.3    6 years ago

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
1.3.7  Tessylo  replied to  Krishna @1.3    6 years ago

CNN: Cohen pleads guilty. 

NBC: Manafort found guilty.

CBS: Hunter indicted.

FOX News: Look at the receipt from 2011 where Hillary didn't tip 15%

 
 
 
Old Hermit
Sophomore Silent
1.3.8  Old Hermit  replied to  Tessylo @1.3.7    6 years ago

Tessylo I read and enjoyed your linked article this morning.  Lots of grins over there.  Thanks for bringing it up.

What was Fox News covering while Manafort and Cohen were in court?

This hilarious meme has some answers.

People on Twitter responded to the channel's reluctance to cover anything that looks bad on Trump into a very amusing meme.

CNN: Manafort and Cohen Guilty!

NBC: Manafort and Cohen Guilty!

BBC: Manafort and Cohen Guilty!

ABC: Manafort and Cohen Guilty!

HLN: Manafort and Cohen Guilty!

Fox News: Hey, do you ever just stare at one spot and zone out for a while? Crazy, right? What’s up with that?

.....................

CNN:          Cohen plea deal

MSNBC:     Cohen plea deal

Fox News:  Are cats becoming too tall?

.................

CNN:           Manafort guilty on 8 counts

NYT:            Manafort guilty of fraud

AP:              Cohen pleads guilty

Fox News:   Were the lobsters on the Titanic happy that it sank?

...................

CNN:         Cohen implicates Trump

MNBC:      Cohen implicates Trump

Fox News: Is a giraffe a type of tall horse?

.................

NBC: Manafort Guilty.Cohen plea deal
CBS: Manafort Guilty.Cohen plea deal
BBC: Manafort Guilty.Cohen plea deal

Fox News: Melania Trump’s cookie receipe next

InfoWars: The Deep State are training coked up rabbits to attack conservatives

...............

CNN:       Manafort Guilty.Cohen plea deal
CNN:       Manafort Convicted, Cohen Pleads Guilty
MSNBC:  Manafort Convicted, Cohen Pleads Guilty

FOOD NETWORK: Manafort Convicted, Cohen Pleads Guilty

ANIMAL PLANET: Manafort Convicted, Cohen Pleads Guilty

FOX NEWS: Tasty Coleslaw Recipes For Labor Day
 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
1.3.9  Trout Giggles  replied to  Old Hermit @1.3.8    6 years ago

laughing dude

Even the Food Network and Animal Planet get it right....but not Fox!

I know it's a joke but it's damned funny

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
1.3.10  Tessylo  replied to  Old Hermit @1.3.8    6 years ago

Thanks for posting that.  I tried to post the whole thing as a separate seed but it wouldn't let me!!!!

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Expert
1.3.11  MrFrost  replied to  Old Hermit @1.3.8    6 years ago

giphy3.gif

 
 
 
A. Macarthur
Professor Guide
1.5  A. Macarthur  replied to  JohnRussell @1    6 years ago

Hoping Trump is dumb enough to pardon Manafort who could them immediately be subpoenaed by Muller and have to testify with no Fifth Amendment option!

Shoujd Manafort refuse the subpeoa or to answer questions or to lie, he’d face contempt or perjury charges.

Go for it Great White Dope!

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
2  Sean Treacy    6 years ago

Still waiting for anything to do with Russian conspiracies.

So much for the Steele dossier. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.1  author  JohnRussell  replied to  Sean Treacy @2    6 years ago

Trump is not remotely qualified to be president of the United States. It wouldn't bother me a bit if he went down because of a conspiracy to commit campaign violations. He's an obvious scumbag. Stop defending this travesty of a human being Sean while you still have a chance. 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
2.1.1  Sean Treacy  replied to  JohnRussell @2.1    6 years ago

He's not going down for a "conspiracy to commit a campaign violation" any more than Obama or Clinton did. This isn't taking money from the Chinese Government like Clinton did in 96, this is a very technical alleged violation. 

The Clintons were huge on getting ND's from Bill Clinton's alleged victims. That was Hillary's job in 1992. Was every non disclosure they obtained  reported as a donation? 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.1.2  author  JohnRussell  replied to  Sean Treacy @2.1.1    6 years ago

deleted

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
2.1.4  Ender  replied to  Sean Treacy @2.1.1    6 years ago

In coordination and at the direction of a candidate for federal office.

Sounds to me like he is saying that trump told him to do it.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.1.5  author  JohnRussell  replied to    6 years ago

Seriously Wally, I'm not a doctor. I can't help you with your delusions that Trump is a normal human being. 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
2.1.7  Sean Treacy  replied to  JohnRussell @2.1.2    6 years ago

This is the supposed bagman of the Russian conspiracy.  The man who taped the President and gave millions of docs to the Feds to pour through.  all those crimes you allege Trump to have committed. 

And this is it? Tell me you are not disappointed. 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
2.1.8  Sean Treacy  replied to  Ender @2.1.4    6 years ago
Sounds to me like he is saying that trump told him to do it.

I'm sure he will. It's still a pretty technical violation, if it is one.  I'd like to see any similar  prosecution along these lines. 

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Expert
2.1.9  MrFrost  replied to  Sean Treacy @2.1.8    6 years ago
I'm sure he will. It's still a pretty technical violation, if it is one.

It's a felony and a federal crime. Downplay it if you like, but it's not a simple misdemeanor. 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
2.1.10  Sean Treacy  replied to  MrFrost @2.1.9    6 years ago
It's a felony and a federal crime

Where's the precedent of a Court interpreting the statute that way?

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.1.11  author  JohnRussell  replied to  Sean Treacy @2.1.7    6 years ago
This is the supposed bagman of the Russian conspiracy.  The man who taped the President and gave millions of docs to the Feds to pour through.  all those crimes you allege Trump to have committed.  And this is it? Tell me you are not disappointed. 

Cohen is hoping he can worm his way through this without completely flipping on Trump. I presume the prosecutors are not going to allow that. 

You are in denial. You keep thinking all of this will blow over in a way that will prove favorable to Trump's re election. That is not going to happen. This is a snowball rolling down a mountain with Trump standing at the bottom in it's path. 

 
 
 
Studiusbagus
Sophomore Quiet
2.1.12  Studiusbagus  replied to  Sean Treacy @2.1.10    6 years ago

Easy...John Edwards...they charged him with a felony for exactly the same circumstance.

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Expert
2.1.13  MrFrost  replied to  Sean Treacy @2.1.10    6 years ago

Seriously? So you are going to keep moving the goal posts? LOL I mean, it was joust a couple months ago that the right was screaming that Stormy Daniels completely made the whole thing up and it was all lies. Now we are down to, "precedence"? Are you shitting me? One time after another, what has been reported about this, (by CNN no less), has been proven right, and trump has, yet again, been proven to be a liar. 

Cohen was trumps PERSONAL lawyer for 17 years. He said that he was trumps, "fixer". And you are seriously going to spin this? Look Sean, I know you aren't dumb, you have GOT to see the futility in trying to defend this. 

 
 
 
Galen Marvin Ross
Sophomore Participates
2.1.14  Galen Marvin Ross  replied to  Sean Treacy @2.1.8    6 years ago
I'm sure he will. It's still a pretty technical violation, if it is one.  I'd like to see any similar  prosecution along these lines.

Here ya go, check out the last sentence,

RALEIGH, North Carolina (AP) — A federal grand jury indicted two-time presidential candidate John Edwards on Friday over $925,000 spent to keep his mistress and their baby in hiding during the peak of his 2008 campaign for the White House.
The case of USA v. Johnny Reid Edwards contains six counts, including conspiracy, four counts of illegal campaign contributions and one count of false statements.
The indictment said the payments were a scheme to protect Edwards’ White House ambitions. “A centerpiece of Edwards’ candidacy was his public image as a devoted family man,” the indictment said.
“Edwards knew that public revelation of the affair and the pregnancy would destroy his candidacy by, among other things, undermining Edwards’ presentation of himself as a family man and by forcing his campaign to divert personnel and resources away from other campaign activities to respond to criticism and media scrutiny regarding the affair and pregnancy,” the indictment added.
The indictment and an arrest warrant were filed in Greensboro, N.C., which is in the district where his campaign was headquartered.
Negotiations between Edwards’ attorneys and federal prosecutors to settle on a charge to which Edwards was willing to plead guilty continued through Thursday, but proved fruitless, according to people with knowledge of the negotiations. Prosecutors had insisted on a plea to a felony, which would endanger his ability to keep his license to practice law.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
2.1.15  CB  replied to  Sean Treacy @2.1.1    6 years ago

Well, if Michael Cohen has pleaded guilty to this,. . . what else don't we know about Michael's sharing?  Image result for image things that make you go hmm

 
 
 
Galen Marvin Ross
Sophomore Participates
2.1.16  Galen Marvin Ross  replied to  Sean Treacy @2.1.1    6 years ago
The Clintons were huge on getting ND's from Bill Clinton's alleged victims. That was Hillary's job in 1992. Was every non disclosure they obtained  reported as a donation? 

Is there any proof that they used campaign funds to make the payments? That is what Cohen admitted to today.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
2.1.17  Sean Treacy  replied to  Studiusbagus @2.1.12    6 years ago

Well, Edwards was found innocent of charges the New York Times described as a "new and novel" theory so we have no idea what an appellate court would have thought about it. 

And Edwards took  million dollars from donors  and gave it to his mistress. Trump repaid the "donation" with his own money. 

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Expert
2.1.18  MrFrost  replied to  Sean Treacy @2.1.17    6 years ago
Trump repaid the "donation" with his own money. 

The affair took place in 2006... Why did he wait 10 years to "donate" to Daniels.... Just weeks before the election? Can you explain that? 

 
 
 
A. Macarthur
Professor Guide
2.1.19  A. Macarthur  replied to  Sean Treacy @2.1.17    6 years ago
Trump repaid the "donation" with his own money. 
Makes no difference … it's still a conspiracy.

 
 
 
Galen Marvin Ross
Sophomore Participates
2.1.21  Galen Marvin Ross  replied to  dennis smith @2.1.20    6 years ago
Trump was voted POTUS so he must have been the better than his opponent

That depends, Cohen says that the two women were silenced to keep their story's from coming out right after the Hollywood Access Tape and, just before the election. Do you think with that evidence out there that Trump would have gotten the 72 thousand votes in three states that put him over on the electoral college, I don't think so.

 
 
 
Galen Marvin Ross
Sophomore Participates
2.1.22  Galen Marvin Ross  replied to  Sean Treacy @2.1.17    6 years ago
Well, Edwards was found innocent of charges the New York Times described as a "new and novel" theory so we have no idea what an appellate court would have thought about it. 

He was found innocent of the charges because the donations came well before the election. In Trumps case the payments to Daniels and, McDougall happened weeks before the election so, the story's would have come out and, been fresh in everyone's minds on election day.

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
2.1.23  cjcold  replied to  dennis smith @2.1.20    6 years ago

30 years of fascist propaganda and lies against Hillary might have played a part.

 
 
 
321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu
Sophomore Guide
2.1.24  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu   replied to  MrFrost @2.1.18    6 years ago
Can you explain that?

Duu.. The Check was lost in the mail ?

 
 
 
321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu
Sophomore Guide
2.1.25  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu   replied to  dennis smith @2.1.20    6 years ago
Trump was voted POTUS so he must have been the better than his opponent

LOL... Somehow at this point that reasoning seems to quickly be losing merit.

 
 
 
Studiusbagus
Sophomore Quiet
2.1.26  Studiusbagus  replied to  Sean Treacy @2.1.17    6 years ago
Well, Edwards was found innocent of charges

Found innocent or escaped through a technical loophole that has since closed?

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
2.1.27  Tessylo  replied to  A. Macarthur @2.1.19    6 years ago
'Trump repaid the "donation" with his own money.'
'Makes no difference … it's still a conspiracy.'

For an affair he never had?

 
 
 
It Is ME
Masters Guide
2.1.28  It Is ME  replied to  Galen Marvin Ross @2.1.22    6 years ago
He was found innocent of the charges because the donations came well before the election. In Trumps case the payments to Daniels and, McDougall happened weeks before the election so, the story's would have come out and, been fresh in everyone's minds on election day.

I didn't know "Before" had a different meaning.

I suppose it depends on whom you are "Beforing" for ?

 
 
 
A. Macarthur
Professor Guide
2.1.29  A. Macarthur  replied to  Tessylo @2.1.27    6 years ago

For funneling money to impact an election outcome:

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Quiet
2.1.30  igknorantzrulz  replied to  A. Macarthur @2.1.29    6 years ago

the fraud election result,

going

down,

from election fraud via election finance violations..,

Trump could probably go down for violating

the damn Laws of Physics, asz hes  violated about Everything, Everyone, and Everything Else, in one way or another

This cult of personality, still Jonesing for a Gym,

to burst in, with a pitcher of catching, not caught in the rye, though so seedy,

as he's only for the white bred,

but when you put all of your baskets in one Egg, obsessed about a wall,

how or who,

could of seen this fall, like

from a torrid autumn,

approaching rapidly, like a ground meating grounds, when meeting grounds

is where

Trumpp finds out how difficult of personality,  physics can be, when you meet

Inertia

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Expert
2.2  MrFrost  replied to  Sean Treacy @2    6 years ago

You do realize that the investigation was never about collusion, right? 

ORDER NO. 3915-2017
APPOINTMENT OF SPECIAL COUNSEL
TO INVESTIGATE RUSSIAN INTERFERENCE WITH THE
2016 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION AND RELATED MATTERS
By virtue of the authority vested in me as Acting Attorney General, including 28 U.S.C.
§§ 509, 510, and 515, in order to discharge my responsibility to provide supervision and
management of the Department of Justice, and to ensure a full and thorough investigation of the
Russian govemmenfs efforts to interfere in the 2016 presidential election, I hereby order as
follows:
(a) Robert S. Mueller III is appointed t() serve as Specia] Counsel for the United States
Department of Justice.
(b) The Special Counsel is authorized to conduct the investigation confinned by then-FBI
Director James 8. Corney in testimony before the House Permanent Select Committee on
Intelligence on March 20, 2017, including:
(i) any links and/or coordination bet ween the Russian government and individuals
associated with the campaign of President Donald Trump; and
(ii) any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation; and
(iii) any other matters within the scope of 28 C.F.R. § 600.4(a).
(c) If the Special Counsel believes it is necessary and appropriate, the Special Counsel is
authorized to prosecute federal crimes arising from the investigation of these matters.
(d) Sections 600.4 through 600. l 0 of Title 28 of the Code of Federal Regulations are
applicable to the Special Counsel.

.........
So Muller can pretty much do as he pleases..

That order? Signed by a republican, that was appointed by a republican that was appointed by trump.

Deal with it. 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
2.2.1  Sean Treacy  replied to  MrFrost @2.2    6 years ago
So Muller can pretty much do as he pleases..

Did I ever say he couldn't? 

You've been promising a Russian conspiracy. Still no indictments alleging one.  

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Expert
2.2.2  MrFrost  replied to  Sean Treacy @2.2.1    6 years ago
You've been promising a Russian conspiracy.

I don't recall ever promising you anything. I have been known to say that the investigation needs to continue. 

 
 
 
Fireryone
Freshman Silent
2.2.3  Fireryone  replied to  Sean Treacy @2.2.1    6 years ago
You've been promising a Russian conspiracy. Still no indictments alleging one.  

Are you under the impression that the investigation is done? It isn't.  Wait for the end, before you declare that there's no conspiracy.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
2.2.4  Sean Treacy  replied to  Fireryone @2.2.3    6 years ago
Are you under the impression that the investigation is done? It isn't.

Who's in the conspiracy? Not Cohen, Not Manafort, Not Papadapoulous, Not Flynn...

The progressives on this site have spent the last 18 months claiming all of them conspired with the Russians. Yet here we are and another alleged conspirator (identified in the Steele dossier no less) doesn't get indicted for conspiring with the Russians.  You need conspirators for a conspiracy.  Who's left? 

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
2.2.5  Ender  replied to  Sean Treacy @2.2.4    6 years ago

Al Capone didn't get taken down for his mob activities. Yet we all knew what he was guilty of.

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
2.2.6  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Ender @2.2.5    6 years ago

He got taken down.  That is the important thing, no matter how it was accomplished.

 
 
 
Fireryone
Freshman Silent
2.2.7  Fireryone  replied to  Sean Treacy @2.2.4    6 years ago
Who's in the conspiracy? Not Cohen, Not Manafort, Not Papadapoulous, Not Flynn...

The hell they weren't. 

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
2.2.8  Trout Giggles  replied to  MrFrost @2.2    6 years ago

But according to the orange baby-man last night, that is what it's all about. He kept saying "collusion" like it was the word of the day

 
 
 
It Is ME
Masters Guide
2.2.9  It Is ME  replied to  Trout Giggles @2.2.8    6 years ago
He kept saying "collusion" like it was the word of the day

At least since January 19th 2017 anyway.

Before that....it was all hush hush....since Trump wasn't supposed to be in the "Picture" anyway. Hillary was the winner. chuckle

How times have "Changed" huh.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
2.2.10  Trout Giggles  replied to  It Is ME @2.2.9    6 years ago

Do you ever write a comment that makes sense?

No...please don't answer that. My decoder ring is busted

 
 
 
It Is ME
Masters Guide
2.2.11  It Is ME  replied to  Trout Giggles @2.2.10    6 years ago
Do you ever write a comment that makes sense? No...please don't answer that. My decoder ring is busted

YOU .……. opened the door

I'm a Vampire after all, so all invites are welcomed by "It Is ME".  devil

My comment made perfect sense to those that DON'T have short memories on "Where and When" all this "collusion" wording REALLY started.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
2.2.12  Trout Giggles  replied to  It Is ME @2.2.11    6 years ago

make that your last comment to me....EVER!

You're a vampire all right....an intellectual vampire

 
 
 
It Is ME
Masters Guide
2.2.13  It Is ME  replied to  Trout Giggles @2.2.12    6 years ago
You're a vampire all right....an intellectual vampire

Door OPENS again.

A big THANKS... from one of the living hosts ! thumbs up

 
 
 
It Is ME
Masters Guide
2.2.15  It Is ME  replied to    6 years ago

I ams what I ams…... just "ME". good one

 
 
 
A. Macarthur
Professor Guide
2.2.16  A. Macarthur  replied to  Fireryone @2.2.7    6 years ago

Four plead guilty and two convictions.

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Expert
2.3  Krishna  replied to  Sean Treacy @2    6 years ago
Still waiting for anything to do with Russian conspiracies.

You are confused-- this trial was not about Russian intervention in the election, or allegations that Trump Colluded with the Russians or committed Obstruction of Justice.

 
 
 
A. Macarthur
Professor Guide
2.4  A. Macarthur  replied to  Sean Treacy @2    6 years ago
Still waiting for anything to do with Russian conspiracies. So much for the Steele dossier. 

Stay patient, Sean, it's coming.

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Guide
2.5  Thrawn 31  replied to  Sean Treacy @2    6 years ago
Still waiting for anything to do with Russian conspiracies.

Who cares, if he was involved in other criminal activity prior to or during the election then fuck him with a pitch fork, lock his fat ass up. A crime is a crime. 

 
 
 
321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu
Sophomore Guide
2.5.1  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu   replied to  Thrawn 31 @2.5    6 years ago
Who cares, if he was involved in other criminal activity prior to or during the election then fuck him with a pitch fork, lock his fat ass up.....

I hate to say and believe this but I do, If president trump did break laws, (and he probably at least had others do so under his direction, which I've always figured he may have) I still don't think he will lose the presidency over it. Seriously. Watch and see. I seriously doubt they find anything serious enough here to topple this president.  

He's already too powerful.

 
 
 
A. Macarthur
Professor Guide
2.5.2  A. Macarthur  replied to  Thrawn 31 @2.5    6 years ago

Only the beginning.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
2.5.3  Trout Giggles  replied to  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu @2.5.1    6 years ago

People thought Nixon was too powerful to be taken down, too

 
 
 
321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu
Sophomore Guide
2.5.4  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu   replied to  Trout Giggles @2.5.3    6 years ago
People thought Nixon was too powerful to be taken down, too

True, Nixon resigned, I look for trump to fight. I'd say it's a little harder to take someone down whos fighting (especially someone to whom rules do not matter much) than it is to take down someone rolling over and playing dead like Nixon did.

trump fought long and hard to be president I doubt he walks away very easily if at all. 

 
 
 
Skrekk
Sophomore Participates
2.5.5  Skrekk  replied to  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu @2.5.4    6 years ago
Nixon resigned, I look for trump to fight.

Trump has even thinner skin and a much more fragile ego than Nixon.

 
 
 
321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu
Sophomore Guide
2.5.6  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu   replied to  Skrekk @2.5.5    6 years ago
Nixon resigned, I look for trump to fight.
Trump has even thinner skin and a much more fragile ego than Nixon.

True but unlike Nixon, trump thinks he's in the right. 

 
 
 
Skrekk
Sophomore Participates
2.5.7  Skrekk  replied to  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu @2.5.6    6 years ago

I doubt Trump even knows the difference between right and wrong.    What's "right" to him is whatever serves his interests at the moment.    That's why he can contradict himself from one sentence to the next and it's why he lies constantly.    He's a sociopath.

 
 
 
321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu
Sophomore Guide
2.5.8  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu   replied to  Skrekk @2.5.7    6 years ago
He's a sociopath.

and that's why I think he would fight and believe he is in the right. From my experience when someone thinks they occupy the high ground even if they are wrong they will dig in like no tomorrow.

Like you said trump seems to have a problem seeing what most of us consider right from wrong, hin his mind he Always occupies the high ground, 

Until trump is ready I dont look for him to go quietly into that good night No matter WTF happens. Like you say hes a sociopath, he has little to no conscience, 

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Expert
3  MrFrost    6 years ago

The right can spin and dance all they want, at the end of the day? Trump has been incriminated by his OWN PERSONAL LAWYER, under oath. 

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Expert
4  MrFrost    6 years ago

And manafort guilty on 8 charges? Is it December 25th already? 

 
 
 
Galen Marvin Ross
Sophomore Participates
4.1  Galen Marvin Ross  replied to  MrFrost @4    6 years ago
And manafort guilty on 8 charges? Is it December 25th already? 

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Expert
5  MrFrost    6 years ago

Lets be very clear here. Cohen plead guilty to paying off two women, on behalf of trump, to keep them silent in an effort to affect a presidential election. 

Very simply put? If Cohen is guilty of doing that, and trump knew about it, (and why would Cohen pay off women if trump knew NOTHING about it?), trump is as guilty as Cohen. 

PERIOD. 

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
5.1  CB  replied to  MrFrost @5    6 years ago

Oh my goodness! I have to find this and post it for y'all: On CNN's Cuomo Prime Time  8/21/18 - Alan Dershowitz (of a recent book publishing to a conservative audience on Trump) is on my television trying to turn "true crime and punishment" into an academic exercise in real-time. Can a second contemporary book for a conservative audience be far off? Check this out:

CUOMO'S COURT 8/21/2018  @17:30mms

When is enough; Enough already!!

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
5.1.1  CB  replied to  CB @5.1    6 years ago

CUOMO'S COURT 8/21/2018

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
5.2  Trout Giggles  replied to  MrFrost @5    6 years ago
If Cohen is guilty of doing that, and trump knew about it, (and why would Cohen pay off women if trump knew NOTHING about it?), trump is as guilty as Cohen. 

Isn't that called conspiracy?

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Expert
5.2.1  MrFrost  replied to  Trout Giggles @5.2    6 years ago

Well, that and, "lying". 

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
5.2.2  Trout Giggles  replied to  MrFrost @5.2.1    6 years ago

I really don't think it should be against the law to lie to any law enforcement. They're allowed to lie to us

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Expert
6  MrFrost    6 years ago

I love it, Rudy just said that Cohen is a liar and not credible. Pretty funny, he was honest and credible before the FBI raided his office.. LOL 

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Expert
6.1  Krishna  replied to  MrFrost @6    6 years ago
I love it, Rudy just said that Cohen is a liar and not credible. Pretty funny, he was honest and credible before the FBI raided his office.. LOL 

He's praised many of his corrupt appointees and associates-- there are some amazing videos showing exactly the praise he had heaped on  Omoroso, Jeff Sessions, etc, etc. (But when they said or did something he didn't like...he got real nasty, real fast!)

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
7  author  JohnRussell    6 years ago

Today he stood up and testified under oath that Donald Trump directed him to commit a crime by making payments to two women for the principal purpose of influencing an election. If those payments were a crime for Michael Cohen, then why wouldn't they be a crime for Donald Trump?

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Expert
7.1  MrFrost  replied to  JohnRussell @7    6 years ago

John, can you imagine what McGhan has told Mueller? 30 hours of under oath testimony.... I bet trumps underwear look like a BMX track today. 

 
 
 
Galen Marvin Ross
Sophomore Participates
7.1.1  Galen Marvin Ross  replied to  MrFrost @7.1    6 years ago

laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude applause

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Expert
7.2  Krishna  replied to  JohnRussell @7    6 years ago
testified under oath that Donald Trump directed him to commit a crime by making payments to two women for the principal purpose of influencing an election.

The noose is tightening...

 
 
 
lennylynx
Sophomore Quiet
7.2.1  lennylynx  replied to  Krishna @7.2    6 years ago

And the witches are burning!

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Expert
8  MrFrost    6 years ago

WallyW, this one is JUST for you...

Benghazi: 4 years, 9 investigatons, (by republicans), an 11 hour long live tv under oath interrogation and 2 FBI investigations... Not one charge, not one indictment, not one guilty plea. 

Trump/Russia: Less than 2 years, (by republicans), one investigation, trump never once answering even one question under oath.. 5 guilty pleas, 3 companies indicted, 109 indictments issued, Cohen implicating the POTUS today....

And let me guess... Benghazi wasn't a witch hunt, but THIS investigation is... 

Keep telling yourself that. Trump is fucked. Accept it. 

 
 
 
Rmando
Sophomore Silent
8.1  Rmando  replied to  MrFrost @8    6 years ago

You forgot to add one lost election in your Benghazi account. If Crooked Hillary hadn't tried to cover up her illegal emails Comey wouldn't have written his letter ten days before the election. And it's all still Hillarys fault in the end.

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Guide
8.1.1  Thrawn 31  replied to  Rmando @8.1    6 years ago

Hillary lost because she was the only candidate as unlikable as Trump, she just had more of a history than fat fuck. And she is shit when it comes to PR.

 
 
 
Rmando
Sophomore Silent
8.1.2  Rmando  replied to  Thrawn 31 @8.1.1    6 years ago

I can actually agree with most of that.

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Expert
8.1.3  MrFrost  replied to  Rmando @8.1    6 years ago
If Crooked Hillary

I'm sorry... How many times has Hillary been sued for fraud? None. Zero... Trump? 3,500 times... Sorry, who was it you were saying is "crooked"? 

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Expert
9  MrFrost    6 years ago

Remember when trumpy said the whole, "Stormy Daniels thing" was all "fake news"? 

OOPS. 

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
9.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  MrFrost @9    6 years ago

Giggle

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Expert
10  MrFrost    6 years ago

Advice trump should have heeded...

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Expert
11  MrFrost    6 years ago

IMG_20180820_201241.jpg

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
11.1  Tacos!  replied to  MrFrost @11    6 years ago

If two people honestly disagree on what the truth is, and the prosecutor decides to believe one of them, he'll prosecute the other for perjury. It can be as simple as remembering something differently or not fully appreciating the point or context of a question. Why expose yourself to that risk if you don't have to?

 
 
 
Galen Marvin Ross
Sophomore Participates
11.1.1  Galen Marvin Ross  replied to  Tacos! @11.1    6 years ago
If two people honestly disagree on what the truth is, and the prosecutor decides to believe one of them, he'll prosecute the other for perjury. It can be as simple as remembering something differently or not fully appreciating the point or context of a question. Why expose yourself to that risk if you don't have to?

And, if there is a tape of the conversation? Cohen has tapes.

 
 
 
Fireryone
Freshman Silent
11.1.2  Fireryone  replied to  Tacos! @11.1    6 years ago
If two people honestly disagree on what the truth is, and the prosecutor decides to believe one of them, he'll prosecute the other for perjury.

Trump lies every day.  Do you honestly expect that he has any credibility?

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Expert
11.1.3  MrFrost  replied to  Tacos! @11.1    6 years ago

There is only one version of the facts.. PERIOD. 

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Expert
11.1.4  Krishna  replied to  Galen Marvin Ross @11.1.1    6 years ago
Cohen has tapes.

And FWIW, so does Omoroso...

(I wonder if there are people who have tapes as well...?)

 
 
 
A. Macarthur
Professor Guide
11.1.5  A. Macarthur  replied to  Tacos! @11.1    6 years ago

You've been listening to Donald … and you sound as "conscious of guilt" as he does.

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
11.1.7  Tacos!  replied to  Fireryone @11.1.2    6 years ago
Trump lies every day.  Do you honestly expect that he has any credibility?

he may not, but neither does Cohen. Remember, this is the guy who said he would take a bullet for Trump. What happened to that?

So, you end up with two unbelievable witnesses. That's not going to work. They need hard independent evidence of a crime, and frankly paying off your whores to keep quiet is not a crime, especially when you're the candidate.

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
11.1.8  Tacos!  replied to  A. Macarthur @11.1.5    6 years ago
as "conscious of guilt" as he does.

This thing with these women is even more of a nothing burger than Russia. Trust me, he's not going down over this.

 
 
 
A. Macarthur
Professor Guide
11.1.9  A. Macarthur  replied to  Tacos! @11.1.8    6 years ago

Whistling past the grave yard.

 
 
 
pat wilson
Professor Participates
11.1.10  pat wilson  replied to  A. Macarthur @11.1.9    6 years ago

Conservatives are twisting themselves into pretzels to defend this PoS. Clearly trump can do no wrong in their eyes. SMH.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
11.1.11  CB  replied to  Tacos! @11.1.7    6 years ago
Trump lies every day.  Do you honestly expect that he [Trump] has any credibility?
he may not

Full stop. Just reflect on what is above—including your three words. Let that sink in now.

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
11.1.12  Tacos!  replied to  CB @11.1.11    6 years ago

What's your point?

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
11.1.13  CB  replied to  Tacos! @11.1.12    6 years ago
Do you honestly expect that he [Trump] has any credibility?  . . .he may not

A sitting president without credibility.  And you are okay with that, because you perceive you can get trinkets out of him? Trump is jumping the shark everyday now. Today, it is actually reported Trump, from his own lips, said that the country can not make it without his brain power guiding it, or words to that effect!

Imagine that! This country falling apart without Trump at the helm:

  • Now does that come across as a man with a sound mind to you?
  • Should we get back control over the nuclear codes and weapons authorization immediately?
 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
11.1.14  Tacos!  replied to  CB @11.1.13    6 years ago
And you are okay with that, because you perceive you can get trinkets out of him?

Where did I say was ok with it? You keep acting like I don't know what I said. I know exactly what I said and I stand by it. I didn't say anything about being okay with it and I don't know what you mean by trinkets.

  • Now does that come across as a man with a sound mind to you?

It strikes me as a person with an enormous ego - something we have know about Trump for 40 years.

  • Should we get back control over the nuclear codes and weapons authorization immediately?

No. He's not the first president to say ridiculous shit.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
11.1.15  CB  replied to  Tacos! @11.1.14    6 years ago
Do you honestly expect that he [Trump] has any credibility?  . . .he may not
A sitting president without credibility.  And you are okay with that, because you perceive you can get trinkets out of him? Trump is jumping the shark everyday now.

Well, you clearly are okay with it. Just read your last comment. As to the (political) trinkets, if you do  not want those-well, what else does a man like Trump have to offer you? Stop wasting energy. Own your spot in this discussion.

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
11.1.16  Tacos!  replied to  CB @11.1.15    6 years ago

You keep trying to imply that there's something more to what I said that I need to admit. I wish you would stop trying to be clever and just say what you mean.

Well, you clearly are okay with it.

I haven't said I'm ok with it. It's only "clear" if I say it. I acknowledged his credibility issues all by myself without any arm-twisting by anyone. It's just a truth. That doesn't mean I approve.

By the way, other presidents, including the last one, were also full of shit on many fronts. I think Trump may be in a category of his own, though.

So what? What would you like me to do about it? Endorse impeachment? Why? Go back and vote for Hillary? She's as full of shit as Trump - or at least as much as would cease to make a difference.

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
11.1.17  Tacos!  replied to  A. Macarthur @11.1.9    6 years ago
Whistling past the grave yard.

That's deep.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
11.1.18  CB  replied to  Tacos! @11.1.16    6 years ago

A sitting president who racks up lies daily is not good for the country. You should discuss with us how to impeach him. He is no good. And, the liar has control authorization over nuclear codes. How is I pitching' now?

If you do not approve, you should be as concerned about a pathological liar having control over your life and the lives of everybody you know and love. That you appear cool and collected signifies you do not yet anticipate problems from a compulsive liar with control over our lives. Here is a tip for you: Your president is under a tremendous amount of stress! Time to worry. . . .

As for my being clever, it was clear to me what you 'said' and what it meant from the git-go. It ain't my, our fault, that your 'guy' is a dangerous liar with more power at his fingertips than he can handle or deserves. We are simply calling it out for what it is.

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
11.1.19  Tacos!  replied to  CB @11.1.18    6 years ago
A sitting president who racks up lies daily is not good for the country.

Oh, I agree. But on November 8, 2016, he was still superior to the alternative.

But impeach for what? Being a pig? Acting like a 7th grader? I don't want the bar that low.

I would love a president who showed honesty and dignity. But I'll sacrifice those things for policy. I would have taken virtually any other person as the Republican nominee. But when it became him or Hillary, I had to choose him. Not that it mattered. I live in California.

Time to worry. . . .

I have plenty to worry about in my own my life. I can't be worrying about nuclear codes.

We are simply dealing with it.

Good luck with that. It won't happen, I think, but if it does, I hope you enjoy President Pence. Heck I would prefer it. I just don't think impeachment is good for the country unless you have a guy who's doing genuinely criminal shit while he's president.

 
 
 
321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu
Sophomore Guide
11.1.20  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu   replied to  Tacos! @11.1.19    6 years ago
Acting like a 7th grader? I don't want the bar that low.

I'll take it, If we could prove a president of the usa had the mind of a 7 year old I'd be all for impeaching the little twerp even though he got that far. 

That's not setting the bar even low enough if ya ask me. 

Trump Won, so far I see nothing impeachable, he's still alive and doing stuff through so one never knows what the future will bring.

 

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
11.1.21  CB  replied to  Tacos! @11.1.19    6 years ago
I have plenty to worry about in my own my life. I can't be worrying about nuclear codes.

Did you really write that? Family!

Trump is bogus. A sham. His policies have little to no "stickability."  If I can be a tad gauche our president's little "get away" with North Korea's Chairman Jun just hit a rough patch with Jun signaling: 'No time to talk right now - working on my own beach-front 'managerie.'

VP Pence will get his come-uppance accordingly. One significant difference between Pence and Trump. Pence is not a megalomaniac. He will 'color inside the lines.'

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
11.1.22  Tacos!  replied to  CB @11.1.21    6 years ago
Did you really write that? Family!

I'm not following you. I didn't use the word family.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
11.1.23  CB  replied to  Tacos! @11.1.22    6 years ago

Think of your family! Someone besides yourself. A compulsive liar has the nuclear codes to this country. Think about someone besides yourself! Family. Us. The world.

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
11.1.24  Tacos!  replied to  CB @11.1.23    6 years ago

I think about my family all the time. I just don't have a rational reason to be concerned about nuclear codes at this moment. There are many things of more immediate and probable concern.

How big is your bomb shelter? How deep? How long do you plan on sheltering? What's your food situation? Water? Air?

I'm just trying to get a sense of how serious you are about nuclear codes and family.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
11.1.25  CB  replied to  Tacos! @11.1.24    6 years ago

I am helping the republic get aware, stay on top of, and get beyond a real menace to America and the surrounding nations: President Donald Trump is a pathological liar on the world stage. We can not afford the political risks that one of his lies will cause international blow-back.

  • Alone with Chairman Kim Jung Un and with translators, what promises did President Trump make which we won't be keeping?
  • Alone with President Putin-what offers were oozed out of President Trump?

Our leader's worldview, at the least, should correspond to the same world and it truths that we inhabit. President Trump is in a different world many times. Seemingly, writing, rewriting, and overlaying his own menagerie! His lies are out of touch, he displays a lack of proper temperament, thus his actions are unstable.

Bomb shelter? Welllllll, in the event of that emergency, I guess I will have to try the vintage 'effort.':

Image result for bend over and kiss your ass goodbye

 
 
 
lady in black
Professor Quiet
12  lady in black    6 years ago

More and more witches going down on this "witch hunt"....poor deluded orange conman traitor in chief.

 
 
 
Skrekk
Sophomore Participates
12.1  Skrekk  replied to  lady in black @12    6 years ago

Mueller is shooting witches in a barrel.

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
13  Tacos!    6 years ago

The campaign finance charge is probably the least of what he is pleading to. By itself, it seems likely he would have only had to pay a fine. It sounds ominous, but it's not such a big deal.

In 2013, the Obama campaign from 2012 was fined $375,000 for failing to disclose the sources of 1,300 large donations totaling almost 2 million dollars and other errors related to several million more dollars in donations. Nobody went to jail. They just paid a fine. 

And of course, the press being the liberal partisans that they are, it wasn't a big scandal either.

 
 
 
Galen Marvin Ross
Sophomore Participates
13.1  Galen Marvin Ross  replied to  Tacos! @13    6 years ago
In 2013, the Obama campaign from 2012 was fined $375,000 for failing to disclose the sources of 1,300 large donations totaling almost 2 million dollars and other errors related to several million more dollars in donations. Nobody went to jail. They just paid a fine.  And of course, the press being the liberal partisans that they are, it wasn't a big scandal either.

He wasn't using the campaign money to pay off women, in Trumps case he was. Does the name John Edwards mean anything to you?

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
13.1.1  Tacos!  replied to  Galen Marvin Ross @13.1    6 years ago
He wasn't using the campaign money to pay off women, in Trumps case he was.

Not sure why that should matter.

Does the name John Edwards mean anything to you?

Yeah it means: acquitted, mistrial, remaining charges dismissed. Good of you to bring that up.

 
 
 
Galen Marvin Ross
Sophomore Participates
13.1.2  Galen Marvin Ross  replied to  Tacos! @13.1.1    6 years ago
Yeah it means: acquitted, mistrial, remaining charges dismissed. Good of you to bring that up.

Now, here's why I brought it up, it is a felony according to what happened in the Edwards case, which means that Cohen implicated Trump in a felony. Does High crimes and, misdemeanors mean anything to you?

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
13.1.3  Tacos!  replied to  Galen Marvin Ross @13.1.2    6 years ago

Edwards was taking money from other people in excess of the limits, then he compounded the problem by falsifying documents and lying about the whole thing to investigators (and he still managed to get off!).

By contrast, Trump is accused of spending his own money on his own campaign. That's just not a crime.

 
 
 
Galen Marvin Ross
Sophomore Participates
13.1.4  Galen Marvin Ross  replied to  Tacos! @13.1.3    6 years ago
By contrast, Trump is accused of spending his own money on his own campaign. That's just not a crime.

Ummm, yes he did commit a crime. Let me explain. When Cohen made the payment through the LLC slush fund he asked Trump to pay the money back to it, Trump did and, when he did, that made the payments a campaign contribution which in turn put it over the amount allowed by law so, Trump accepted a campaign contribution over the legal limit, thus according the law, it is a crime.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
13.1.5  author  JohnRussell  replied to  Tacos! @13.1.3    6 years ago
To put it bluntly, the facts as alleged and as admitted to by Michael Cohen under oath in court yesterday make the President of the United States an unindicted participant in a conspiracy to violate Federal law. In this particular case, the law(s) in question are those that place monetary limits on the amount that can be donated to a federal campaign either in cash or in the form of an in-kind contribution and the laws that require campaigns to report any such contributions as part of their regular Federal Election Commission reports. Additionally, the fact that the reimbursements for the payments made by Cohen were disguised in the form of phony invoices submitted to Trump’s real estate company arguably constitute mail and/or wire fraud, violations of Federal laws regarding filing false claims in connection with an election campaign, fraud, and other charges. In other words, in a fairly small number of words uttered in a lower Manhattan courtroom yesterday, Michael Cohen implicated his former client in a conspiracy to violate a number of Federal laws for the purposes of influencing a Federal election. If it weren’t for the fact that Trump is currently the sitting President, there’s a strong possibility that he would have been indicted along with Cohen on the charges related to the payments to Daniels and McDougal. This means that, effectively, the President of the United States is an unindicted co-conspirator in the Cohen case even though he is not officially named as such in the same matter that Richard Nixon was during the course of the Watergate prosecutions, at least not yet.00

As a matter of law, of course, it takes more than just the testimony of an accomplice like Michael Cohen to implicate Trump or any other co-conspirator in this or any other case. In addition to the rather obvious questions about Cohen’s own credibility, it is generally the case that accomplice testimony must be corroborated either by testimony from others or by documentary evidence. In this case, though, it seems clear that the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York has such evidence at hand. What it does based on that remains to be seen, but the importance and the severity of what happened yesterday cannot be understated. Donald Trump is more than just a buffoon in a job that he is clearly unqualified for, more than just a narcissistic xenophobe who has praised white supremacists as “very fine people” and appealed to the worst aspects of American politics to get elected. He is a man who engaged in a conspiracy to illegally influence the outcome of a Presidential election by illegally suppressing information. As such, he is an existential threat to the Republic. Nothing that happens between now and the day when he finally leaves office, either voluntarily or otherwise, will change that.

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
13.1.6  Tacos!  replied to  JohnRussell @13.1.5    6 years ago
the facts as alleged and as admitted to by Michael Cohen under oath in court yesterday . . .

 . . . are inadmissible as substantive evidence against someone else in another case.

Could they be a problem for him politically? Sure. "High crimes and misdemeanors" are whatever Congress says they are. Given the current, and even possible future, composition of Congress, I doubt this will rise to that level. In a criminal case, Cohen's plea and words are useless unless they're offered as evidence of credibility.

 
 
 
A. Macarthur
Professor Guide
13.2  A. Macarthur  replied to  Tacos! @13    6 years ago
And of course, the press being the liberal partisans that they are, it wasn't a big scandal either.

Time to enter the world of reality.

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
13.2.1  Tacos!  replied to  A. Macarthur @13.2    6 years ago
Time to enter the world of reality.

I understand it will be painful for you.

 
 
 
A. Macarthur
Professor Guide
13.2.2  A. Macarthur  replied to  Tacos! @13.2.1    6 years ago

The Pee Wee Herman rebuttal ...

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
13.2.3  Tacos!  replied to  A. Macarthur @13.2.2    6 years ago
The Pee Wee Herman rebuttal ...

Don't be so hard on yourself.

 
 
 
A. Macarthur
Professor Guide
13.2.4  A. Macarthur  replied to  Tacos! @13.2.3    6 years ago
Don't be so hard on yourself.

That's two Pee Wees in a row!

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
13.2.5  Tacos!  replied to  A. Macarthur @13.2.4    6 years ago

You still haven't figured out, I guess, that you're getting the level of discourse you have earned as based on your own comment.

 
 
 
Studiusbagus
Sophomore Quiet
13.2.6  Studiusbagus  replied to  Tacos! @13.2.5    6 years ago

Whether it's admissable or not, we know you aren't an attorney.

 The real problem that's going to snap a bit of reality to you and many of the right is Cohen's going to sing...Weissellberg got immunity...now imagine that, the guy that has been in the Trump company longer than Donald in a very high position has his balls locked in a vise and is getting immunity....next, we have David Pecker also with his balls in a vise and singin' like Sinatra.

 Cohen, Weisselberg, Pecker, McDougal, Stormy Daniels, and the NYS Attorney General which would also involve his kids too and he can't pardon them from that....Oh! And did I mention Weissellberg also ran the Trump Foundation?

He's about to resign....and get a good divorce lawyer! 

LMFAO

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
13.2.7  bugsy  replied to  A. Macarthur @13.2.4    6 years ago
That's two Pee Wees in a row!

And "whistling past the graveyard" is not?

 
 
 
A. Macarthur
Professor Guide
13.2.8  A. Macarthur  replied to  Tacos! @13.2.5    6 years ago

Three for three … each content-free!

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
13.2.9  Tacos!  replied to  A. Macarthur @13.2.8    6 years ago

You still don't get it. My responses are as content-filled as your own.

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
13.2.10  Tacos!  replied to  Studiusbagus @13.2.6    6 years ago
we know

I'm not terribly impressed with, nor do I care about what you think you know.

 
 
 
Studiusbagus
Sophomore Quiet
13.2.11  Studiusbagus  replied to  Tacos! @13.2.10    6 years ago
I'm not terribly impressed with, nor do I care about what you think you know.

As if I care, but I don't have the credibility problem of changing my screen name to escape my bullshit....Ron.

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
13.2.12  Tacos!  replied to  Studiusbagus @13.2.11    6 years ago

I know I'm going to regret responding, but 1) I have no idea what that means and 2) Who/what is Ron?

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
14  Jack_TX    6 years ago
Potentially an extremely serious development for the Trump presidency. 

Why, exactly? 

 
 
 
Fireryone
Freshman Silent
14.1  Fireryone  replied to  Jack_TX @14    6 years ago

It's more evidence that he's crooked as hell. 

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
14.1.1  Jack_TX  replied to  Fireryone @14.1    6 years ago

Has anyone ever doubted that? 

I thought people were past caring.

 
 
 
Fireryone
Freshman Silent
14.1.2  Fireryone  replied to  Jack_TX @14.1.1    6 years ago
Has anyone ever doubted that? 

Apparently the majority of congressional GOP members don't give a flying flip.  Maybe soon they will see trump as the disaster that he is. 

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
14.1.3  Jack_TX  replied to  Fireryone @14.1.2    6 years ago

Meh.  We're not anywhere near the conviction count for Clinton associates, and Democrats defended him fiercely.  It's a bit laughable for them to try and take the moral high ground now.

 
 
 
Fireryone
Freshman Silent
14.1.4  Fireryone  replied to  Jack_TX @14.1.3    6 years ago

Dude, you are into the whataboutisms?  The clintons are history.  Forget about them, there's nothing to be done to change the past.   

It's a bit laughable for them to try and take the moral high ground now.

You must be joking. I don't recall anyone ever colluding with a foreign government to win an election, paying off people to keep stories out of the news in order to win and then LYING constantly about the whole mess.

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
14.1.6  JBB  replied to  Jack_TX @14.1.3    6 years ago
We're not anywhere near the conviction count for Clinton

You are disingenuously counting Whitewater for which the Clintons were never indicted and which had exactly zero to do with any malfeaseance in the Clinton administration. Also, it should be noted that Obama's was the squeeky cleanest eight year administration in history with zero nada no zip ranking campaign or administration officials ever indicted for malfeasance in office. Here are the real numbers per recent administrations. Trump will beat them all...

EXECUTIVE BRANCH CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES BY PRESIDENTIAL ADMINISTRATION
ADMINISTRATION PARTY

YEARS IN

OFFICE

CRIMINAL

INDICTMENTS

CRIMINAL

CONVICTIONS

PRISON

SENTENCES

BARACK OBAMA Democratic 8 0 0 0
GEORGE W. BUSH Republican 8 16 16 9
BILL CLINTON Democratic 8 2 1 1
GEORGE H. W. BUSH Republican 4 1 1 1
RONALD REAGAN Republican 8 26 16 8
JIMMY CARTER Democratic 4 1 0 0
GERALD FORD Republican 2.4 1 1 1
RICHARD NIXON Republican 5.6 76 55 15

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
14.1.7  Jack_TX  replied to  JBB @14.1.6    6 years ago

"Disingenuous".  The new code word for "fact that is inconvenient to liberal anger."

Indeed...the Clintons were never indicted.

Oddly enough.... neither has Donald Trump.

The inconvenient truths just keep rolling.

BTW...citing Daily Kos?...stop embarrassing yourself.

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
14.1.8  JBB  replied to  Jack_TX @14.1.7    6 years ago
BTW...citing Daily Kos?...stop embarrassing yourself.

The numbers are correct. Why deny the truth? You really have no argument. So, you just deny deny deny...

You don't even have an argument. You don't even have different numbers or "alternative facts" in this case.

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Expert
14.1.9  MrFrost  replied to  Jack_TX @14.1.7    6 years ago

If the numbers are correct, it doesn't matter where the info came from. If you want to bash the source, that's fine, but at least post information that refutes what was posted......which we know you won't do because you can't. 

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
14.1.10  Tacos!  replied to  JBB @14.1.6    6 years ago
malfeasance in office. . . Trump will beat them all...

How many have been charged or convicted for something that happened while Trump was in office? Any?

I mean, I know it's early, but so far, it's all been either Russians or something that happened before Trump was elected. In some cases a long time before.

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
14.1.11  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Jack_TX @14.1.1    6 years ago
I thought people were past caring.

His supporters were past caring long ago. During the campaign Trump claimed he could shoot someone in the street and not lose any of his base and he got a round of applause from them. The law means nothing to desperate, angry, bitter partisans who would prefer a white-centric Christo-fascist government to freedom, equality and democracy any day. Trump could just come out and pardon everyone in his administration and campaign, including himself, claim he had the power to do so, and his brain washed followers wouldn't even bat an eye. Republicans can just stop pretending that they support the constitution, laws, justice and freedom, they obviously don't and admit to as much by their support of this incompetent President.

 
 
 
A. Macarthur
Professor Guide
14.1.12  A. Macarthur  replied to  Tacos! @14.1.10    6 years ago
How many have been charged or convicted for something that happened while Trump was in office? Any?

Glad you asked … free knowledge to those who bring their own containers and I will fill them to overflowing … be they buckets or thimbles … 'cause … that's the king of guy I am.

Michael Flynn

Michael Flynn , who served as Trump’s national security adviser for less than a month before resigning, was  charged and pleaded guilty  in December 2017 to making false statements to the FBI. 

Flynn reportedly lied about his talks with Russia's ambassador to Washington. In late 2016, while former President Barack Obama was still in office, the two allegedly spoke about the U.S. sanctions imposed on Russia.

This raised concerns that Flynn, a retired Army lieutenant general, misled Trump officials about his conversations with Russian officials.

Paul Manafort

FILE - In this July 17, 2016 file photo, then-Trump Campaign Chairman Paul Manafort talks to reporters on the floor of the Republican National Convention at Quicken Loans Arena in Cleveland as Rick Gates listens at back left. Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley is considering issuing subpoenas to Manfort and two FBI officials close to fired director James Comey as part of the panel's investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 elections.(AP Photo/Matt Rourke, File)

Paul Manafort turned himself in to authorities in October.   (The Associated Press)

The special counsel filed a 32-count indictment on Feb. 22 against former Trump campaign chairman  Paul Manafort  and aide Rick Gates, accusing the pair of tax evasion and bank fraud. 

The new indictment accused Manafort and Gates of doctoring documents to inflate the income of their businesses and then using those fraudulent documents to obtain loans. It also accused Manafort of evading taxes from 2010 through 2014 and, in some of the years, concealing his foreign bank accounts.

And on Feb. 23, a newly unsealed indictment accused Manafort of secretly paying former European politicians to lobby on behalf of Ukraine.

Manafort turned himself in to federal authorities in the fall. The 69-year-old served as Trump’s campaign manager for a few months in 2016. Gates, Manafort's business associate, also turned himself in at the time. 

Manafort was initially charged in a 12-count indictment in connection with foreign lobbying work, and he pleaded not guilty. The charges included: conspiracy against the U.S., conspiracy to launder money, false statements, unregistered agent of a foreign principal, and multiple counts of failure to file reports of foreign bank and financial accounts,  according to a  special counsel's office spokesman.

In June 2018, Mueller's team  brought additional charges  of obstruction of justice against Manafort and Konstantin Kilimnik, an associate.

Manafort sued to have the case against him dismissed and argued that  Mueller had overstepped his bounds  by charging him for conduct he says is unrelated to Russian interference in the 2016 election.

On June 15, however,   Manafort was jailed   after a federal judge revoked his $10 million bail based on new witness tampering charges brought by Mueller.

Manafort was found guilty of eight financial crimes on Aug. 21 in the first trial victory of the special counsel investigation into the president's associates. A judge declared a mistrial on 10 other counts the jury could not agree on.

Richard Gates

FILE - In this July 21, 2016 file photo, Rick Gates, campaign aide to Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump, at the Republican National Convention in Cleveland.  Trump's former campaign chairman, Paul Manafort, and a former business associate, Rick Gates, have been told to surrender to federal authorities Monday, according to reports and a person familiar with the matter.(AP Photo/Evan Vucci, File)

Richard Gates pleaded not guilty to all charges.   (The Associated Press)

Rick Gates  was named alongside Manafort in the recent charges brought by the special counsel. He's accused of 11 counts related to filing false income tax returns and three counts of failure to report foreign bank and financial accounts.

Gates  pleaded guilty  on Feb. 23 to federal conspiracy and false-statements charges.

In wake of the guilty plea, Mueller  moved to drop  the 22 bank and tax fraud charges against him. The decision to drop the more expansive charges against Gates could suggest that the former Trump campaign official is cooperating and providing good information to Mueller's team.

Like Manafort, Gates was initially indicted in October in connection with foreign lobbying work; he pleaded not guilty at the time. His charges were similar to Manafort’s – ranging from conspiracy against the U.S. to conspiracy to launder money.

A superseding criminal complaint says Gates was charged with conspiracy against the United States between 2006 and 2017.

George Papadopoulos

george papadopoulos

George Papadopoulos pleaded guilty to the charges against him.   (Alexandria Sheriff's Office)

A former foreign policy adviser to Trump’s presidential campaign,  George Papadopoulos  pleaded guilty in 2017 to making false statements to the FBI regarding “the timing, extent and nature of his relationships and interactions with certain foreign nationals whom he understood to have close connections with senior Russian government officials,” according to  court documents .

He also reportedly tried to set up meetings between Russian and Trump campaign officials on various occasions. 

Alex van der Zwaan

Alex van der Zwaan arrives at a plea agreement hearing at the D.C. federal courthouse in Washington, U.S., February 20, 2018. REUTERS/Yuri Gripas - RC129AC156E0

Attorney Alex van der Zwaan pleaded guilty to lying to investigators about his interactions with Gates.   (Reuters/Yuri Gripas)

Mueller's team charged Dutch attorney Alex van der Zwaan for lying to federal investigators in the Russia probe in federal court on Feb. 16. He pleaded guilty and was   sentenced to 30 days in prison  and given a $20,000 fine on April 3.

Van der Zwaan was   released from prison   on June 4 and turned over to Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials. 

According to  charging documents , van der Zwaan was employed by a law firm hired by the Ukraine Ministry of Justice in 2012. He admitted to lying about his interactions with Gates.

The charge against van der Zwaan did not involve election meddling or the Trump campaign's operations. It stemmed from the special counsel's investigation into a covert Washington lobbying campaign Manafort and Gates are accused of directing on behalf of pro-Russian Ukrainian interests.

The law firm where he used to work says it fired him last year and will continue cooperating with authorities as needed.

Richard Pinedo

Richard Pinedo, a California man who sold bank accounts to Russians meddling in the election,  pleaded guilty  to using stolen identities to set up the bank accounts in February.

The U.S. government said Pinedo did not know that he was dealing with Russians when he sold the accounts. The plea was announced on the same day that Mueller’s office charged 13 Russians and the indictment was the most direct allegation to date of illegal Russian meddling during the campaign.

Pinedo ran the online service Auction Essistance, buying and selling bank account numbers so customers could avoid security measures of digital payment companies,  Newsweek reported . The  Auction Essistance  website says it is “currently undergoing scheduled maintenance.”

13 Russian nationals

A grand jury indicted  13 Russian nationals and three Russian companies  in February for allegedly interfering in the 2016 election. In the case, Mueller details a sophisticated plot to wage “information warfare” on the U.S.

The indictment is the first to be brought against Russian nationals in Mueller's investigation. 

However, the Justice Department said the indictment does not allege that the interference changed the outcome of the election.

"There is no allegation in this indictment that any American was a knowing participant in this illegal activity," said Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, who oversees the special counsel probe.

12 Russian intelligence officers

The Justice Department on July 13 announced that   12 Russian intelligence officers   were indicted for allegedly hacking the Democratic National Committee, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee and Hillary Clinton's campaign during the 2016 election.

All 12 are members of GRU, the Russian intelligence agency.

The indictments, which stem from the Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s probe into Russia’s efforts to interfere in the 2016 presidential election, were announced by Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein.

Fox News' Samuel Chamberlain, Brooke Singman, Alex Pappas and The Associated Press contributed to this report. 

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
14.1.13  JBB  replied to  Tacos! @14.1.10    6 years ago
How many have been charged or convicted for something that happened while Trump was in office? Any?

You should know this, it is common knowledge. Mike Flynn and Rick Gates pled guilty to crimes they committed in office...

Trump's personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, pleaded guilty to serious crimes committed at the behest of Don "The Don" Trump.

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
14.1.14  Tacos!  replied to  JBB @14.1.13    6 years ago

Both of them pled guilty to things they did before Trump was sworn in as president. Now, for Flynn, it was a few weeks before Trump was sworn, but since the topic was "malfeasance while the president was in office" neither one of these counts. Not that I would hold Trump responsible for either one. Why should we?

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Expert
14.2  Krishna  replied to  Jack_TX @14    6 years ago
Potentially an extremely serious development for the Trump presidency. 
Why, exactly? 

If anyone is interested, there's an opportunity to Get Smarter Here:

As Michael Cohen pleads guilty, here’s the risk for Trump

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Guide
14.3  Thrawn 31  replied to  Jack_TX @14    6 years ago
Why, exactly? 

Because he is flipping, which means he will be singing like a bird to investigators to save his own ass and if he knows anything else shady about Trump then investigators will look at him directly. Not exactly good news if you are fat ass.

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
14.3.1  Jack_TX  replied to  Thrawn 31 @14.3    6 years ago

Meh.

All of that presumes that IF Trump actually did anything illegal, he was smart enough to hide it so well that a former FBI director still hasnt found it yet.

There is exceedingly little evidence to support such a presumption.

 
 
 
321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu
Sophomore Guide
14.3.2  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu   replied to  Jack_TX @14.3.1    6 years ago
There is exceedingly little evidence to support such a presumption.

I agree, presumably IF Trump actually did anything illegal, he was not smart enough to hide it. 

It appears if he did and he tried to hide it, it wasn't hidden well enough because when the strings get really pulled, it sure seems like the president knew more than he let on. Time and time again ! Either that or trump really isn't very observant and didn't even vet his own personal puppet people worth a shit !

Either way this is certainly Not living up to be "The Best of The Best !"  by a fiuckin long shot. 

What's next ?  

 
 
 
Skrekk
Sophomore Participates
14.3.3  Skrekk  replied to  Jack_TX @14.3.1    6 years ago
All of that presumes that IF Trump actually did anything illegal, he was smart enough to hide it so well that a former FBI director still hasnt found it yet.

I suspect Mueller knows about Trump's conspiracy involving campaign finance fraud.    He reads the real news rather than watching Fox.

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Expert
14.3.4  MrFrost  replied to  Jack_TX @14.3.1    6 years ago
All of that presumes that IF Trump actually did anything illegal

Lets look at it another way:

1) The affair was in 2006, why did Cohen/Trump wait 10 YEARS to pay her off. Is the fact that the payoff was done just weeks before the election cycle all just some weird coincidence? Unlikely. 

2) Who benefits from silencing these two women? It's not Cohen, it's trump that is benefiting. 

3) Trump is a micro manager, always has been, to even suggest that Cohen paid these two women off without donny's knowledge is laughable. And then there are the tapes of Cohen discussing the payments with donny. 

4) Cohen plead guilty before he was even offered a plea deal. Why would he do that? Because there is no question that he is guilty and if Cohen is guilty, so is donny.

5) Cohen was trumps personal lawyer for 17 years. The fact that donny and rudy are bending over backwards trying to discredit him speaks volumes. Then know Cohen has the goods on Donny and they know that donny is fucked. 

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
14.3.5  cjcold  replied to  Jack_TX @14.3.1    6 years ago
that IF Trump actually did anything illegal, he was smart enough to hide it

The words "smart" and "Trump" should not exist in the same sentence.

 
 
 
A. Macarthur
Professor Guide
15  A. Macarthur    6 years ago

To those who called me "snowflake" and continuously told me … "Trump won, get over it … "

HI!

Told ya' so. It's just a matter of time.

And once the Republican Trump-pimps in Congress smell the political liability … watch for the come-to-Jesus "bipartisanship" …

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
15.1  JBB  replied to  A. Macarthur @15    6 years ago

One thing for sure, republicans in congress all suffered a simultaneous spontaneous evacuation of their bowels today...

 
 
 
Silent_Hysteria
Freshman Silent
16  Silent_Hysteria    6 years ago

Out of all the BS Dems have thrown at the wall in hopes of something sticking this is the first legitimate thing I have seen that may have some weight.  I'll have to read some more on it.  

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Expert
16.1  Krishna  replied to  Silent_Hysteria @16    6 years ago
 I'll have to read some more on it.

I have a feeling there will also be a lot more revealed about some of Trump's appointees in the near future...

 
 
 
Silent_Hysteria
Freshman Silent
16.1.1  Silent_Hysteria  replied to  Krishna @16.1    6 years ago

This will be interesting.... as if trump paid her with his own money... even if not knowing where the money was going IF he truly just stayed hands off the finances....

the issue will benwith Cohen billing his hours worked to the campaign.  From what I can see so far.  Doing some more digging on how this may play out.  

What throws a monkey wrench into things is how cohen is going down with it... as it seems he is not taking a deal to be a witness from what I can tell.  Not excusing anything.  Jusy trying to to wrap my head around how it may play out with what info I can find

 
 
 
Skrekk
Sophomore Participates
16.1.2  Skrekk  replied to  Silent_Hysteria @16.1.1    6 years ago
even if not knowing where the money was going IF he truly just stayed hands off the finances....

Based on the audio tapes Cohen made we already know that's not true. 

 
 
 
Silent_Hysteria
Freshman Silent
16.1.3  Silent_Hysteria  replied to  Skrekk @16.1.2    6 years ago

Good point.  I guess the issue would be was trump paying him solely from campaign funds or was he also paying him personally AND did he know when he was getting billed.  Could be a case of Cohen knowingly charging the wrong account. In which case it would be just on him possibly.  

Which this wouldn't be an issue if trump had a separate lawyer for personal issues and paid from his personal accounts.  As I said... not excusing anything.  I'll wait until it plays out and see what other info comes out... but this is the first thing I've seen that seems credible. 

 
 
 
Silent_Hysteria
Freshman Silent
16.1.4  Silent_Hysteria  replied to  Silent_Hysteria @16.1.1    6 years ago

Ok.  After looking at some stuff closer this is going to be interesting how it plays out.  Will still need more info BUT

It seems the worst of the charges were tax fraud from some years ago. Then a couple of campaign contribution charges.... which seems that usually ends up as a fine.  I believe obama campaign got hit with one of the largest fines around 375k from what I can tell.  

I'm going to have to wait and see this unfold more before I know if it is legit something going to happen.  Too much weird shit going on to be sure... isn't part of cohens plea deal that he won't be testifying anywhere?  Which seems weird if he was going to be used to tag trump in something.

why am I skeptical?  Let's look at the past claims of people who were helping to take trump down

Bannon

omarosa

flynn

flynn jr

papadapolous 

manafort

and now cohen.  

While we have went from proof of

Russian puppet 

Russian collusion

obstruction

to bow campaign finance law

Its possible... but excuse me for becoming skeptical of wolf 

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
16.1.5  cjcold  replied to  Krishna @16.1    6 years ago

Any Trump appointee is dirty by definition.

 
 
 
Skrekk
Sophomore Participates
16.1.6  Skrekk  replied to  Silent_Hysteria @16.1.3    6 years ago
I guess the issue would be was trump paying him solely from campaign funds or was he also paying him personally AND did he know when he was getting billed.

It really doesn't matter too much how they rigged the financial scheme and laundered the hush money.   No matter how you look at it there was a conspiracy which resulted in 1) an illegal corporate donation; 2) an illegal private donation in excess of $2,700; or 3) an unreported donation by the candidate himself.

Plus you have not just one of the co-conspirators admitting under oath to the crime, but you even have an audio recording where they discuss the conspiracy.

Given these facts shouldn't any judicial nominations be put on hold indefinitely until Trump is removed from office?

 
 
 
Silent_Hysteria
Freshman Silent
16.1.7  Silent_Hysteria  replied to  Skrekk @16.1.6    6 years ago

Yes but not disclosing has happened in the past.  You realize obama was fined 375k for campaign contribution violations as well?  Are his SCOTUS picks null and void? Hell Rosie O'Donnell got caught deliberately changing her name and address to hide she was donating more than she was allowed.  Should she go to jail? 

Cohen is going to jail for his tax fraud... the campaign violations are icing for him.  

Again.  I'll wait and see how this plays out.   However I've gotten numb to "this is it!" Over exaggerations of people who HOPE this will cause him to get kicked out of office.  

If it was that major I don't see mueller kicking it down to the state level. 

It may be big...  however I can't trust the people calling wolf all the time and it ends up being nothing. 

I'll trust the investigation and whatever mueller declares and recommends...the arm chair lawyers keep making everything sound like every issue is life in prison

 
 
 
Skrekk
Sophomore Participates
16.1.8  Skrekk  replied to  Silent_Hysteria @16.1.7    6 years ago
You realize obama was fined 375k for campaign contribution violations as well?  Are his SCOTUS picks null and void?

LOL.   But Obama!   But Hillary!

All of those were very minor civil infractions and had no criminal intent whatsoever, unlike what Trump and Cohen did.   This clarifies the difference for those who watch too much Faux News:

But there is no comparison, experts told NBC News. Cohen's admitted campaign finance law violations are indeed a crime, and they are not similar to the campaign finance violations made by Obama's 2008 campaign. Election law experts said that more minor violations are treated as regulatory or civil matters, while egregious and willful campaign finance violations are treated as criminal acts — no matter who the attorney general is.

Trump, in his Wednesday morning tweet, appeared to be referring to a $375,000 fine levied by the Federal Election Commission in early 2013 against Obama's 2008 presidential campaign over a slew of campaign finance violations, including missing filing deadlines for disclosing large donations during the final weeks of the campaign, reporting the wrong dates on certain contributions, and not returning donations that exceeded the campaign contribution maximum quickly enough.

The violations amounted to "a small, technical paperwork error that people who were trying to get it right might make," Epner said. "$375,000 for the FEC is a meaningful fine, but compared to the amounts that were involved it's tiny."

Often, reoccurring donations can put a donor over the legal limit, Epner explained. Campaigns are required to keep track of donation totals and return the excess within 60 days. The Obama campaign did not do this on time with some donations, and an Federal Elections Commission audit found some unnoticed donations that exceeded the legal limit and were subsequently refunded by the campaign , Epner said, citing the FEC's conciliation agreement with the campaign.

So those are minor and unintentional bookkeeping mistakes, not the deliberate criminal conspiracy which Trump and Cohen engaged in and which was directed by Trump.

By the way, Cohen was just subpoenaed by the state of NY for his role in helping Trump commit tax fraud through his "charity".

 
 
 
Silent_Hysteria
Freshman Silent
16.1.9  Silent_Hysteria  replied to  Skrekk @16.1.8    6 years ago

Sigh. 

It isnt about "but obama"...

its about precedent to determine what usually happens.  

If trump used campaign funds he is screwed.  If he used his own money it makes it a failure to report issue.

This wasn't a plan to funnel money to politicians from corporations that have landed people jail time. 

There are "experts" as well saying it won't amount to anything.  

Which is why I'm saying I'll wait to see if anything comes of it.  If you don't hear about it anymore in a week......

again... how many times have we heard "this is it!!" Over the past two years?

 
 
 
Galen Marvin Ross
Sophomore Participates
16.1.10  Galen Marvin Ross  replied to  Silent_Hysteria @16.1.9    6 years ago
This wasn't a plan to funnel money to politicians from corporations that have landed people jail time.  There are "experts" as well saying it won't amount to anything.

Your experts are wrong,

"Michael Cohen took this step today so that his family can move on to the next chapter," Cohen attorney Lanny Davis said in a statement. "This is Michael fulfilling his promise made on July 2nd to put his family and country first and tell the truth about Donald Trump. Today he stood up and testified under oath that Donald Trump directed him to commit a crime by making payments to two women for the principal purpose of influencing an election. If those payments were a crime for Michael Cohen, then why wouldn't they be a crime for Donald Trump?"

Cohen testified in federal court, according to his lawyer, that Donald Trump himself directed Cohen to commit a crime.

Deputy U.S. attorney Robert Khuzami said in a statement outside the courthouse that Cohen sought reimbursement for the payments from the candidate's company. Khuzami called that a "sham." Khuzami declined to name the candidate — but court documents describe "Individual-1" as someone "who at that point had become the president of the United States."

 
 
 
Skrekk
Sophomore Participates
16.1.11  Skrekk  replied to  Silent_Hysteria @16.1.9    6 years ago
It isnt about "but obama"... its about precedent to determine what usually happens.  

The precedent is whether there was criminal intent and whether the amount is substantial.

.

If trump used campaign funds he is screwed.  If he used his own money it makes it a failure to report issue.

Both claims are true but that's clearly not what happened here even if Trump eventually reimbursed Cohen.

.

This wasn't a plan to funnel money to politicians from corporations that have landed people jail time. 

Actually the audio recording the public has heard includes discussion of a shell corp to launder the money and we now know that there were a number of overt acts made to advance the conspiracy.

.

again... how many times have we heard "this is it!!" Over the past two years?

The wheels of justice turn slowly, but grind exceedingly fine.     Already quite a few key Trump campaign officials have been indicted, convicted or agreed to a plea bargain.    And the latter group are now cooperating witnesses.

 
 
 
Silent_Hysteria
Freshman Silent
16.1.12  Silent_Hysteria  replied to  Skrekk @16.1.11    6 years ago

I'm watching this indifferent honestly.  It seems I'm pro trump on this it is only because I'm not going to fall for click bait media who have claimed "this is it" for two years straight.  I'll look at it realistically and not hopes and dreams bias.  

Example.  Brad smith the former FEC chair who helped write the regulations is on record saying it isn't a violation.  Between him and Rachel marrow who do you logically think would have more weight on it? 

This was closer than anything thrown at the wall so far...i would say you're putting your money on the wrong outcome though.  All those indictments from campaign members were in regards to things well before the campaign.  Totally unrelated.  This was probably the first thing that was even remotely close... and it's a FEC campaign donation issue??

so we have went from Russian plant, to Russian collusion, obstruction, and now campaign finance is the one that is going to get him!  You may not agree... but after all this time and that's all that's came out??...It isn't partisan to be skeptical.  I still believe if there was anything major they would have gotten it out by now to prevent any major damage to the office of president.  Going 2-4 years with trump making policy when they could have put forth evidence that was strong early would be asinine.  If you had strong evidence of collusion and crimes would you sit on it for years or get it out ASAP so removal process could start?

 Your trump U point may be better to look for the outcome you want.... if he used money from that would be substantial

edit: I was trying to find the forums for lawyers I was on earlier but lost it.  It was surprisingly non partisan. They were discussing it legally and were pretty much United there isn't anything there from what we now know.  Possibly more we don't know that could be huge.  Relatively.  I'll see if I can find it again.  Just interesting reading their discussions on it

 
 
 
lennylynx
Sophomore Quiet
17  lennylynx    6 years ago

So what that Trump is a Russian agent; Bill Clinton got a blowjob!

 
 
 
Rmando
Sophomore Silent
17.1  Rmando  replied to  lennylynx @17    6 years ago

This article is about Trump allegedly ordering Cohen to pay off two women. Russia has nothing to do with this.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
17.2  Tessylo  replied to  lennylynx @17    6 years ago
'So what that Trump is a Russian agent; Bill Clinton got a blowjob!'
laughing dude

Luv ya Lenny!

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
17.3  cjcold  replied to  lennylynx @17    6 years ago

I get blow jobs and never had to campaign for POTUS.

 
 
 
Rmando
Sophomore Silent
18  Rmando    6 years ago

If liberals think that 2/3 of the Senate will kick Trump out of office over this then they must've slept through 1998. The stench of hypocrisy from the Dems will irritate the voters now as much as the GOP members getting caught with their own mistresses did back then. Get ready for a slew of dirt to come out on sitting Dems about their campaign finances. Bob Menendez actually got a hung jury in spite of all the evidence on him and he's still in his Senate seat. 

 
 
 
321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu
Sophomore Guide
18.2  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu   replied to  Rmando @18    6 years ago
Get ready for a slew of dirt to come out on sitting Dems about their campaign finances.

So what they've learned a new trick, just call anything slightly incriminating Fake News, say something really stupid and walk away. Problem solved !

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
18.3  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Rmando @18    6 years ago
Get ready for a slew of dirt to come out on sitting Dems about their campaign finances.

"Republican Congressman Duncan Hunter and his wife, Margaret, routinely -- and illegally -- used campaign funds to pay personal bills big and small, from luxury vacations to kids' school lunches and delinquent family dentistry bills, according to a stinging 47-page indictment unsealed Tuesday."

"Republican Representative Chris Collins, of New York, the very first congressman to endorse President Donald Trump’s campaign, was arrested Wednesday by the FBI on charges of securities fraud, according to an indictment filed against him."

The dirt's coming out, but it's not on Democrats...

 
 
 
Rmando
Sophomore Silent
18.3.1  Rmando  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @18.3    6 years ago

You do know that Trump hasn't even begun fighting back on this and just like the #MeToo movement this move will probably boomerang back and hit more Dems than Repubs. Just ask Al Franken and Eric Schneiderman.

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
18.3.2  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Rmando @18.3.1    6 years ago
Trump hasn't even begun fighting back on this

Why would Trump be fighting to defend Republican congressmen's campaign fund abuse and insider trading charges?

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
19  Ender    6 years ago

The spin on fox is unbelievable.

One even said that he took a five year sentence and all he had to do was lie about trump.

Delusional.

 
 
 
The Magic 8 Ball
Masters Quiet
20  The Magic 8 Ball    6 years ago
Potentially an extremely serious development for the Trump presidency. 

not a chance....  trump did not use campaign money.  and most every politician has done the same.

yall are going to need something bigger than this.

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Expert
20.1  MrFrost  replied to  The Magic 8 Ball @20    6 years ago
 trump did not use campaign money. 

1) You know this how?

2) The affair happened in 2006....Why did trumpy wait 10 YEARS to pay for her silence....just weeks before the election?

We'll wait for you to explain that one... LOL

 
 
 
Skrekk
Sophomore Participates
20.2  Skrekk  replied to  The Magic 8 Ball @20    6 years ago
trump did not use campaign money.

Hush money paid right before an election is considered a campaign donation.    It would have been legal if the person's total donation to the campaign was $2,700 or less, but it was far more than that.

 
 
 
LynneA
Freshman Silent
20.3  LynneA  replied to  The Magic 8 Ball @20    6 years ago

yall are going to need something bigger than this

I believe 'bigger' is coming.  Lanny Davis has invited the Special Counsel to speak to his client.  Cohen has knowledge/information, with plenty of time before his sentencing date, to tell all.  His guilty plea today is the tip of the Cohen~Trump iceberg.  

As Neal Sadaka sang...🎶breaking up is hard to do🎶🎶🎶

 
 
 
Galen Marvin Ross
Sophomore Participates
20.3.1  Galen Marvin Ross  replied to  LynneA @20.3    6 years ago

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
20.4  cjcold  replied to  The Magic 8 Ball @20    6 years ago

How about money laundering?

 
 
 
lady in black
Professor Quiet
21  lady in black    6 years ago

Former Trump aides:

Personal lawyer Cohen - (pleaded guilty)

Campaign Chairman Manafort - (found guilty on 8 counts)

Deputy campaign chairman and top transition official Gates - (pleaded guilty)

NSA Flynn - (pleaded guilty)

Campaign aide Papadopoulos - (pleaded guilty)

Orange conman traitor in chief only hires the best and brightest....Yeah right.

 
 
 
321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu
Sophomore Guide
21.1  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu   replied to  lady in black @21    6 years ago
the best and brightest....Yeah right

It seems the swamp is being drained, but I doubt this is what trump had in mind. 

He probably thought once he had the power his people would be overlooked.

It appears president trump was wrong on more than one account.

Go figure that hiring tax evaders, con men, election contribution misdealings and meeting with russian government people would be considered part of the stinking bureaucratic swamp.  

Who knew.. right. 

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
21.1.1  CB  replied to  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu @21.1    6 years ago

You know what gets me angry is our resident republicans are sitting here playing hard to understand the truth when it is staring them right back in the eye-unblinkingly.

I was listening to 'El Rushbo' today (Ba Dum Tsshh!), as all these federal 'cases' were breaking, and a couple of regular patriots (Ba Dum Tssh!) called into the show; El Rushbo and these good men traded off carrying the Trump 'load' just a little farther today. Then, that's when it dawned on me. These people did not want truth; they want Trump-venom and warts galore!

That's when it hit me hard and fast: Trump is "family" to Trump supporters!

 
 
 
Skrekk
Sophomore Participates
21.1.2  Skrekk  replied to  CB @21.1.1    6 years ago

No doubt you were wondering "What is Michele Bachmann thinking right now?"

“Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton colluded together with a former spy from Russia to spy on Donald Trump’s campaign, including embedding a human being in his campaign to spy on him and use the instruments of the United States government – the CIA, the FBI – to spy on a candidate for president. The government was used against political opponents.

“I’ll tell you the people who should be under investigation, really who should be in jail right now, and I don’t say this to be partisan, is our former president, our former candidate for the Democrat Party. So rather than Donald Trump being under the microscope, it should be Hillary Clinton, it should be Barack Obama.”

 
 
 
321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu
Sophomore Guide
21.1.3  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu   replied to  CB @21.1.1    6 years ago
Trump is "family" to Trump supporters!

Yeah in a since. Some people get so "invested" in another person their own identity does seem to them to include their invested person being "acceptable" to the world as well. 

I think it actually starts with the other person having the same ideology about some common issues or believes with someone who has power (whether real or perceived) and is willing (supposedly at least) to "Share" that power... O boy that sure is even more motive to defend their invested one. 

It's like a cult mentality 

Yep a "Family" 

PS: Hint, Do NOT drink the purple trump aid !

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Expert
21.1.4  Krishna  replied to  Skrekk @21.1.2    6 years ago
So rather than Donald Trump being under the microscope, it should be Hillary Clinton, it should be Barack Obama.”

No-- rather than Bill and Hillary it should be George and Martha!

And what about Herbert Hoover? And President James Polk?

William Henry Harrison?

Grover Cleveland (and his mother-- anyone who would name their kid Grover is definitely a left wing Socialist! Probably an unbeliever as well!)

George Washington--- and especially Martha Washington!

Yup-- Martha. LOCK HER UP LOCK HER UP!

(Anything to distract from the current news....)

 
 
 
lennylynx
Sophomore Quiet
21.1.5  lennylynx  replied to  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu @21.1.3    6 years ago

Trump-aid is orange!

 
 
 
Galen Marvin Ross
Sophomore Participates
21.1.6  Galen Marvin Ross  replied to  Skrekk @21.1.2    6 years ago
No doubt you were wondering "What is Michele Bachmann thinking right now?"

She thinks?

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
21.1.7  CB  replied to  Skrekk @21.1.2    6 years ago

Yeah, we have. . . *dizzy* memories (and quotes) from dear FORMER Representative Michelle Bachmann. She never stops. . . that thing she does. (Whatever you wish to call it.)

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
21.1.8  CB  replied to  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu @21.1.3    6 years ago

Trump has mesmerized his "family." He will continue to enthrall them as they feed off his twitter account, conservative talk media, and the multiplicity of RALLIES! Well, it will take 'other' red republicans to subdue this 'inner mob' with its glazed over eyes and that follow 'him; anywhere stare.

Republicans! Conservative mass media is lying to you! 'El Rushbo' is lying to you. I can not accept that the vast majority of republicans buy into - mind manipulation - techniques. For the record, Donald Trump is a lot of things—charismatic? I don't think so.

Republicans, save yourselves. Only you can!

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
21.1.9  Trout Giggles  replied to  CB @21.1.8    6 years ago
He will continue to enthrall them as they feed off his twitter account, conservative talk media, and the multiplicity of RALLIES! Well, it will take 'other' red republicans to subdue this 'inner mob' with its glazed over eyes and that follow 'him; anywhere stare.

Ever watch documentaries about Hitler? Some of them show old footage of the crowds at his rallies and such. There is one particular bit that has always been cringe worthy. The camera catches this one particular woman who has such a look of rapture? adoration? obsession? You've seen it.

 
 
 
It Is ME
Masters Guide
21.1.10  It Is ME  replied to  Trout Giggles @21.1.9    6 years ago
The camera catches this one particular woman who has such a look of rapture? adoration? obsession? You've seen it.

YEP !

Loser 2.jpg Loser 3.jpg LOSER.jpg

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
21.1.11  Trout Giggles  replied to  It Is ME @21.1.10    6 years ago

don't talk to me

 
 
 
It Is ME
Masters Guide
21.1.12  It Is ME  replied to  Trout Giggles @21.1.11    6 years ago
don't talk to me

I didn't. I typed !

 
 
 
321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu
Sophomore Guide
21.1.13  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu   replied to  CB @21.1.8    6 years ago
Trump has mesmerized his "family."

“We all felt that we were a ‘family’ rather than a church,” 

The Peoples Temple Members Were a Racially-Mixed Family Dedicated to Improving the World
The Peoples Temple is often branded as a cult whose members blindly devoted their allegiance to a man and a cause at the expense of their own selves and livelihoods. But a closer look at Jim Jones’ followers reveals a large and diverse mix of racial backgrounds and age groups who were drawn to the church’s  activist and  progressive ideals.

In the end,  approximately 304 people aged 17 years or younger found dead in Jonestown.

 
 
 
Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו
Junior Participates
21.1.14  Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו  replied to  It Is ME @21.1.10    6 years ago

Just keep that old saying in mind:  what goes around, comes around. 

 
 
 
321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu
Sophomore Guide
21.1.15  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu   replied to  It Is ME @21.1.10    6 years ago
a look of rapture? adoration? obsession?

Your pictures look more like looks of sorrow to me. 

Now in this picture these folks look obsessed with their cell phones. 

th.jpg

 
 
 
It Is ME
Masters Guide
21.1.16  It Is ME  replied to  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu @21.1.15    6 years ago

laughing dude

aaaaahhhhhh…..The Walking "Rubbernecker". Gotta luv them ? Not Impressed

 
 
 
It Is ME
Masters Guide
21.1.17  It Is ME  replied to  Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו @21.1.14    6 years ago
Just keep that old saying in mind:  what goes around, comes around. 

What happened in elections from 2010 to 2016 wasn't much of a shock. who me?

I'm STILL …….. Waiting..... to be SHOCKED that is. Thinking 2

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
21.1.18  Tessylo  replied to  Skrekk @21.1.2    6 years ago

That batshit crazy bitch Bachman (Marcus Bachman's beard)  belongs in an asylum.  She's got those Charles Manson eyes.  

 
 
 
321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu
Sophomore Guide
21.1.19  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu   replied to  It Is ME @21.1.16    6 years ago
aaaaahhhhhh…..The Walking "Rubbernecker". Gotta luv them ? 

Not so much crossing the street I don't....lol

 
 
 
It Is ME
Masters Guide
21.1.20  It Is ME  replied to  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu @21.1.19    6 years ago
Not so much crossing the street I don't....lol

They've lost the ability of "Facial Reading" or "Emotion Recognition" . Emoji REQUIRED now !

The "HunchBack of Notre Dame" is making a comeback for sure. 

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
21.1.21  CB  replied to  Trout Giggles @21.1.9    6 years ago

I'd love to see that one. Can you locate it and show us?

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
21.1.22  CB  replied to  It Is ME @21.1.10    6 years ago

Okay, friend It Is Me. I've checked and there is a difference between rapturous joy and the loss (sorrow) expressed on the faces of your images: Loser, Loser 1, and Loser 2.

 
 
 
It Is ME
Masters Guide
21.1.23  It Is ME  replied to  CB @21.1.22    6 years ago

I'd call those type (Loser) faces in my pictures.....being "Obsessed" with someone.

Really, Crying because a lifer politician lost an election ?

Really ? Is life that "Slow" for people like that ?

They weren't even close to being that upset when Weinstein was caught......fiddling with the Queens of Hollywood.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
21.1.24  Trout Giggles  replied to  CB @21.1.21    6 years ago

I'll try. Might be difficult to find

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
21.1.25  CB  replied to  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu @21.1.13    6 years ago

Yep! Jim Jones had charismatic power. Once in my life, I was in a large room with Mr. Jim Jones.  Now that you mention it—you might not be wrong in your assessment. Donald Trump may be a qualified charismatic leader, after all. In his own way, that is.

 
 
 
Skrekk
Sophomore Participates
21.1.26  Skrekk  replied to  CB @21.1.25    6 years ago

There's a reason the only book Trump has on his night stand is the collected speeches of Hitler.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
21.1.27  CB  replied to  It Is ME @21.1.23    6 years ago

Well, considering. . . .

That it was a loss to a conniving, pompous, ' gas-lighter ' who bad-mouths good, honest, people for self-promotional purposes, profit, and cheap thrills can drive even a stoic to momentarily distraction.

The "loser" designations for your images, came from the pictures themselves. Just to be clear.

 
 
 
321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu
Sophomore Guide
21.1.28  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu   replied to  It Is ME @21.1.23    6 years ago
Really, Crying because a lifer politician lost an election ?

Some people were just as invested in clinton as were some people are invested in trump. 

Some of the people invested in trump seemed out of their mind with ecstasy the same night. 

Most of us who didn't especially didn't want trump became very sober knowing we now did not know where our future would be taken, and still dont. Much of what president trump has started is just that started. Time will show us all the outcomes. Good or bad. 

 
 
 
Old Hermit
Sophomore Silent
21.1.29  Old Hermit  replied to  Trout Giggles @21.1.24    6 years ago
Trout Giggles : Ever watch documentaries about Hitler? Some of them show old footage of the crowds at his rallies and such. There is one particular bit that has always been cringe worthy. The camera catches this one particular woman who has such a look of rapture? adoration? obsession? You've seen it.
Calbab: I'd love to see that one. Can you locate it and show us?
Trout Giggles : I'll try. Might be difficult to find

Too many examples to be able to chose just one without knowing which documentary it was which had the image that caught your eye Trout.

Perhaps something from the propaganda film; TRIUMPH OF THE WILL (1935)

TRIUMPHOFTHEWILL.png

CrowdsWelcomeHitler.png

.

The only things missing are the " Make (Put Countries Name of Choice Here), Great Again " hats and the attacks on the media gathered to report on the rallies.

.

Other random shots of adoring crowds from other sources.

adolphhitlernazigermanysecondworldwarww2rarepicturesimagesphotos002.jpg

ans3803s.jpg

TheSS.png

hitler7768x576.jpg

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
21.1.30  CB  replied to  Old Hermit @21.1.29    6 years ago

Thank you, AH-t!

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
21.1.31  CB  replied to  Old Hermit @21.1.29    6 years ago

Thank you, AH-t!

 
 
 
It Is ME
Masters Guide
21.1.32  It Is ME  replied to  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu @21.1.28    6 years ago

I just VOTE !

If whom I voted for WINS.....GREAT !

If whom I voted for loses.....Oh Well, Life goes on. I just go back to my little Ol' business and do the same thing I always have.

The next Election Cycle that comes up, I VOTE again. 

It's as simple as that.

 
 
 
It Is ME
Masters Guide
21.1.33  It Is ME  replied to  CB @21.1.27    6 years ago
The "loser" designations for your images, came from the pictures themselves. Just to be clear.

That's how I saved them.

As for Hillary being Better ?, Toby Keith put it best:

"This election, I don't think it makes a difference," he said when asked if he knew which candidate he would vote for. " I can't believe there's 300 million Americans in this country and we've got these two as our final two. It's absolutely crazy.    I want to live in a country that's functional. I don't want to live in a country that's on the skids. So it doesn't matter if it's a Democrat, independent, Republican or just a citizen who's running for president. If they're doing a good job, let 'em do a good job."

 
 
 
321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu
Sophomore Guide
21.1.34  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu   replied to  Old Hermit @21.1.29    6 years ago

Gee what a happy lookin group.

I guess it is true, ignorance is bliss. 

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
21.1.35  CB  replied to  It Is ME @21.1.33    6 years ago

Well, for one thing, I can not picture Hillary Clinton as president being on my television morning, noon, and night. For that you need a megalomaniac. As President Theodore Roosevelt says, "Walk softly and carry a big stick." Meaning negotiate first and reserve force as an option. Trump is behaving like a bull in a china shop! Items are being moved out of their places; stuff is hitting the floor, and very little is being given the respect its due.

Trump's good job so far is temporary and by the way, his accomplishments are laying on a foundation built by a democrat: former President Barack H. Obama. Whom Trump won't say one good word. And now, the question becomes: Will you say a good word about former President Obama?

 
 
 
It Is ME
Masters Guide
21.1.36  It Is ME  replied to  CB @21.1.35    6 years ago
Trump is behaving like a bull in a china shop! Items are being moved out of their places; stuff is hitting the floor, and very little is being given the respect its due.

That "Walk Softly" thingy worked when Leaders in this country had some gutz to actually wield the "Big Stick" !

After so many "Weenie" roles by politicians over the last decades.....It's time the "Bull" broke up the shop for a change. "Apology Tours" make the "Big Stick" look like a Limp twig.  

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
21.1.37  CB  replied to  It Is ME @21.1.36    6 years ago

You are obviously reading and listening to too much FOX News and conservative radio. Seeing the world through 'disruptive' eyeglasses you will always find some reason on a clear day to complain about blue sky. Just remember, El Rushbo and Sean Hannity lead a pack which get humongous bucks to blow mole hills into mountains!

Living in relative peace with your neighbors while being firm with them is not the same thing as telling them it's my way or the highway. Besides, Trump has kicked stuff over, but then he refuses to go back and complete the deals. INCOMPLETE.


Trump's good job so far is temporary and by the way, his accomplishments are laying on a foundation built by a democrat: former President Barack H. Obama. Of whom,Trump won't say one good word. And now, the question becomes: Will you say a good word about former President Obama?

 
 
 
It Is ME
Masters Guide
21.1.38  It Is ME  replied to  CB @21.1.37    6 years ago
Living in relative peace with your neighbors while being firm with them is not the same thing as telling them it's my way or the highway

Never heard that.

I heard...…."Time for you to pick up the pace you PROMISED to do".

When Trump laid out NATO for building that Billion Dollar Monument to themselves......It was great.

It always makes me laugh when "Great Structures" can be built, but when it comes to Actually towing the line, they never seem to have that money to …… Tow that Line !

And as far as trade goes......Every Country is in it for themselves. Problem is....This Country has had too many leaders that let the other countries have what they want. IMO......Times UP for them ! Our country has "Legal" citizens too.....in case you forgot.

And by the way.….I try and stay away from "OPINION BASED" Fact? news.

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Expert
21.2  Krishna  replied to  lady in black @21    6 years ago
Former Trump aides:

I'm too lazy to google it, but recently I saw a video on YouTube of Trump praising Omorosa. Yup-- he hires only the best.

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Quiet
21.3  arkpdx  replied to  lady in black @21    6 years ago

Personal lawyer Cohen - (pleaded guilty)

Only two counts had anything to do with Trump and those are questionable

Campaign Chairman Manafort - (found guilty on 8 counts)

None of the counts had anything to do with Trump or the campaign

Deputy campaign chairman and top transition official Gates - (pleaded guilty)

None of the counts had anything to do with Trump or the campaign and he worked with and for Manager not Trump 

NSA Flynn - (pleaded guilty)

Only of allegedly lying to the FBI not for anything to do with Trump

Campaign aide Papadopoulos - (pleaded guilty)

Only of allegedly lying to the FBI not for anything to do with Trump

As far as the last two are concerned, if lying to the FBU is a crime,  when is Hillary going to be charged?  She not only lied to the FBI but also to Congress and the American people. 

 
 
 
321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu
Sophomore Guide
21.3.1  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu   replied to  arkpdx @21.3    6 years ago
None of the counts had anything to do with Trump or the campaign

True, However,

IMO: Mr.Trump was associating and doing business with these people whether or not he or them did anything nefarious regarding this specific election isn’t the stopping point for me.

The fact that Mr. trump associated with people of this caliber at all certainly allows me to question his ability to choose decent quality people at all both, from his past, the present an of course going forward.  

Personally to me it appears president trump’s promises of securing “Only the Best of The Best !” seems more like a campaign slogan more than a reality.

IMO: If this is "the best of the best" america really has to offer. Well we're all just ... fucked. 

Thankfully, I dont believe they are ! They were just trump choices. 

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Quiet
21.3.2  arkpdx  replied to  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu @21.3.1    6 years ago
Well we're all just ... fucked. 

We were that right after the democrats nominating convention in '08. We had the two worst candidates in our history. Fortunately for us, the better (and only slightly so) of the two won the election and became president .

 
 
 
321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu
Sophomore Guide
21.3.3  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu   replied to  arkpdx @21.3.2    6 years ago
We were

We were and are until "We the people" step back and relax and actually look at who actually started and who is continuing this great divide between the citizenry of this county. 

We the people didn't start this fight, we the people dont benefit from our infighting, the media and our politicians are the people who stated and the people who actually are profiting from this.   

If and when We the people ever decide we've had enough of this division and their profiting in power and wealth from it, maybe we will actually join forces and demand they stop this dividing up of us for their own power and profit.

Till then IMO: ... Yep, we're Fucked !

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
21.3.4  CB  replied to  arkpdx @21.3.2    6 years ago

The fact is likely we demand too much out of our leaders, all of them. No matter what they do-there is a 'side' of critics to slam each and everyone of them into the wall! And, TALK RADIO being the worst of all, on all sides!

John McCain passed away tonight. A good man. A man with a long legacy. Yet, he died, in part despised by some members with shifting loyalties, of whom he loved all his days! As a liberal democrat, but in the past a conservative, I have no particular interest in John McCain, but I do recognize a fine man when I see one. Even when he is not for me.

  1. What is wrong with us, as people?
  2. Do we really like the politics put forth?
  3. Generally speaking, is it our elected officials that are manic, or is it the people back home—us?

Our 'old guard' is dying out one-by-one. Joan Rivers is gone now, another of the 'old guard,' who use to reprimand: "Oh, grow up America!"

To which I'd like to add: "We can't keep politically 'exhausting' and working out our best politicians, because what will be left is the scum. Not the creme of the crop!


All of the above said, Donald Trump's pathological lies sets him apart and he even now has never been a proper politician.

 
 
 
A. Macarthur
Professor Guide
22  A. Macarthur    6 years ago

Lest we overlook the ultimate reality ...

A stolen election.

 
 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
24.1  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  A. Macarthur @24    6 years ago

Thanks for the link but I am truly sorry. When you combine dailykos and MSNBC in your single argument, you lost. Have you EVER seen an article or report on ANYTHING good this administration has done on/in either one of those? Rhetorical. The majority of this particular "article" was about Manafort, Cohen, and Flynn because they did some stupid shlt. Manafort 12 frigging years ago. They were investigating him in 2012 and perhaps before. Why wait to drop the hammer after being in the Trump campaign...............other than the fact that they dragged their feet so much that the statute of limitations were about to run out especially where Manafort was concerned?

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
24.1.2  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Kathleen @24.1.1    6 years ago

You too Kathleen and safe travels with your daughter. My son goes next year and his mom is already in panic mode.........Sad

 
 
 
Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו
Junior Participates
24.1.3  Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @24.1    6 years ago
When you combine dailykos and MSNBC in your single argument, you lost.

We'll be watching carefully for your sources, if you ever use any.  

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Expert
26  MrFrost    6 years ago

trumpfired.jpg

 
 
 
Studiusbagus
Sophomore Quiet
27  Studiusbagus    6 years ago

Well, one thing's for sure. It's thoughtfully quiet around the whitehouse dinner table...everyone is worried.

Cohen's lawyer has announced that Cohen has plenty to say to Mueller and isn't making any deals and also will refuse a presidential pardon because Trump is so corrupt the pardon would mean nothing..

 He's going to start singing and dancing like Gene Kelly.

Trump is so fucked!

 
 
 
The Magic 8 Ball
Masters Quiet
28  The Magic 8 Ball    6 years ago

just curious... how many times has the left fallen for the same ol story

trump will be impeached any minute now.  (and then nothing happens)

question:

how long before trump is not impeached will the left realize they are chasing another rainbow that does not exist?

a few weeks?  a few months? inquiring minds want to know :)

 
 

Who is online



105 visitors