It's all catching up to Adam Schiff

It has now been revealed that Michael Cohen met with House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., several times before testifying before the panel last week. What is unusual about that? Schiff excluded the minority members (Republicans) of the Committee. Cohen admitted, when confronted with the question during his recent hearing, that he had talked to Schiff "about topics that were going to be raised at the upcoming hearing."
Rep Mike Turner (OH) has sent a letter to Cohen's legal team asking who Cohen met with before his appearance before House & Senate Committees. We all remember Cohen's opening statement which condemns the President in the most detrimental way.
Did Davis write that long diatribe?
Or did Schiff help out?
Then there is the question of Schiff's wild accusations. We all know about his ridiculous statements concerning "direct evidence" of collusion, but does anyone know that on page 6 of the Schiff memo (the memo that failed to contradict Nunes) there is an allegation that Christopher Steele was not paid by the FBI for his "work"?
https://docs.google.com/viewerng/viewer?url=http://docs.house.gov/meetings/ig/ig00/20180205/106838/hmtg-115-ig00-20180205-sd002.pdf
Well that was another lie contradicted by the testimony of Bruce Ohr:
Bruce Ohr testified that the FBI paid Christopher Steele for information at the same time Steele was being paid by Hillary Clinton and the DNC and at the same time he was being paid to work for Putin-connected Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska.
Hacks like Schiff will eventually get tangled up in their own lies.

Portrait of a liar
And democrats are fine with it.
What they do is deflect or wallow in "whataboutism"
There are three examples of Liberal whataboutism in comments 2, 2.1 and 3.
I bet one or all three deny it
His nickname, "Shifty Schiff", is well-earned.
There is a similar one going around
Did you add an additional "f" to his first name?
Trump nicknamed him well. What a two faced lying idiot Schiff is.
And this is different from Issa, Gowdy, and Nunez how?
The right has nowhere to go after all the bullshit they pulled.
Do as I say, not as I do.
Hacks like Schiff will eventually get tangled up in their own lies.
I have to ask this question I suppose:
Why the outrage over possible lies from Mr. Schiff and Mr. Cohen but not one word regarding the torrent of lies that emanate from Mr. Trump on a minute to minute basis?
If one is to be outraged over a lie, to be credible the outrage cannot be selective or it becomes moot and hypocritical. A lie is a lie, regardless of who may mouth the words.
If we always have to refer to Trump, then we have to admit that we can't deal with the topic under discussion.
The only reason I brought up Mr. Trump is the fact that he is relevant to the question and the topic. If you are going to be outraged over Schiff lying, then you must offer the same outrage for Mr. Trumps lies.
We have heard it all before. You use Trump to excuse the words & deeds of democrats.
The word "LIE"... is the new Political word of the day !
Used to be some kind of - Phobe or Racism.....but that's passe' now !
Good times.....Good times !
Nah, they've been lying and we've been listening to them for years, nothing new when a politician lies. The only thing that seems to matter of late is who may be telling the lie.
The media seems to delight in Highlighting only "Certain" folks....instead of telling the "Entire" truth "ABOUT ALL" !
I suppose that leaves us to select our liar of choice. Try NEWSY, kind of similar to PBS where you just get the news and you can draw your own conclusions, rather than theirs.
Witness tampering? Imagine the howling on the left if Republicans ever tried to do it. I am sure Pelosi will get right on this make sure Schiff is censored./S
You stole my thunder. Isn't Manafort going to jail for pleading Guilty to Witness Tampering in part? Why is Adam Schiff still walking free?
OUCH - damn facts will get in the way again Tom.