╌>

It's all catching up to Adam Schiff

  

Category:  Op/Ed

By:  vic-eldred  •  5 years ago  •  24 comments

It's all catching up to Adam Schiff
"These questions are important for the public to understand whether or not they were watching witness testimony, a public hearing, or well-rehearsed theater Read Newsmax: Fox News: Before Testifying, Cohen Spent 10 Hours With Schiff's Staff | Newsmax.com

It has now been revealed that Michael Cohen met with House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., several times before testifying before the panel last week.  What is unusual about that?  Schiff excluded the minority members (Republicans) of the Committee. Cohen admitted, when confronted with the question during his recent hearing, that he had talked to Schiff "about topics that were going to be raised at the upcoming hearing."
Rep Mike Turner (OH) has sent a letter to Cohen's legal team asking who Cohen met with before his appearance before House & Senate Committees. We all remember Cohen's opening statement which condemns the President in the most detrimental way.

Did Davis write that long diatribe? 

Or did Schiff help out?

Then there is the question of Schiff's wild accusations. We all know about his ridiculous statements concerning "direct evidence" of collusion, but does anyone know that on page 6 of the Schiff memo (the memo that failed to contradict Nunes) there is an allegation that Christopher Steele was not paid by the FBI for his "work"?

https://docs.google.com/viewerng/viewer?url=http://docs.house.gov/meetings/ig/ig00/20180205/106838/hmtg-115-ig00-20180205-sd002.pdf

Well that was another lie contradicted by the testimony of Bruce Ohr:

Bruce Ohr testified that the FBI paid Christopher Steele for information at the same time Steele was being paid by Hillary Clinton and the DNC and at the same time he was being paid to work for Putin-connected Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska.

D1JPbuUW0AELTmX.png


Hacks like Schiff will eventually get tangled up in their own lies. 


Article is LOCKED by author/seeder
[]
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1  author  Vic Eldred    5 years ago

Portrait of a liar

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
1.1  Sean Treacy  replied to  Vic Eldred @1    5 years ago

And democrats are fine with it. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.1.1  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Sean Treacy @1.1    5 years ago

What they do is deflect or wallow in "whataboutism"

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Quiet
1.1.2  arkpdx  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.1.1    5 years ago

There are three examples of Liberal whataboutism in comments 2, 2.1 and 3.

I bet one or all three deny it

 
 
 
Jasper2529
Professor Quiet
1.2  Jasper2529  replied to  Vic Eldred @1    5 years ago
Portrait of a liar

His nickname, "Shifty Schiff", is well-earned. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.2.1  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Jasper2529 @1.2    5 years ago

There is a similar one going around

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Quiet
1.2.2  arkpdx  replied to  Jasper2529 @1.2    5 years ago

Did you add an additional "f" to his first name? 

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
1.2.3  XXJefferson51  replied to  Jasper2529 @1.2    5 years ago

Trump nicknamed him well.  What a two faced lying idiot Schiff is.  

 
 
 
Studiusbagus
Sophomore Quiet
2  Studiusbagus    5 years ago

And this is different from Issa, Gowdy, and Nunez how?

The right has nowhere to go after all the bullshit they pulled.

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
2.1  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Studiusbagus @2    5 years ago

Do as I say, not as I do.

 
 
 
luther28
Sophomore Silent
3  luther28    5 years ago

Hacks like Schiff will eventually get tangled up in their own lies.

I have to ask this question I suppose:

   Why the outrage over possible lies from Mr. Schiff and Mr. Cohen but not one word regarding the torrent of lies that emanate from Mr. Trump on a minute to minute basis?

   If one is to be outraged over a lie, to be credible the outrage cannot be selective or it becomes moot and hypocritical. A lie is a lie, regardless of who may mouth the words. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.1  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  luther28 @3    5 years ago

If we always have to refer to Trump, then we have to admit that we can't deal with the topic under discussion.

 
 
 
luther28
Sophomore Silent
3.1.1  luther28  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.1    5 years ago

The only reason I brought up Mr. Trump is the fact that he is relevant to the question and the topic. If you are going to be outraged over Schiff lying, then you must offer the same outrage for Mr. Trumps lies.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.1.2  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  luther28 @3.1.1    5 years ago

We have heard it all before. You use Trump to excuse the words & deeds of democrats.

 
 
 
It Is ME
Masters Guide
3.2  It Is ME  replied to  luther28 @3    5 years ago
If one is to be outraged over a lie, to be credible the outrage cannot be selective or it becomes moot and hypocritical

The word "LIE"... is the new Political word of the day !

Used to be some kind of - Phobe or Racism.....but that's passe' now !

Good times.....Good times ! jrSmiley_12_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
luther28
Sophomore Silent
3.2.1  luther28  replied to  It Is ME @3.2    5 years ago

Nah, they've been lying and we've been listening to them for years, nothing new when a politician lies. The only thing that seems to matter of late is who may be telling the lie.

 
 
 
It Is ME
Masters Guide
3.2.2  It Is ME  replied to  luther28 @3.2.1    5 years ago
The only thing that seems to matter of late is who may be telling the lie.

The media seems to delight in Highlighting only "Certain" folks....instead of telling the "Entire" truth "ABOUT ALL" !

 
 
 
luther28
Sophomore Silent
3.2.3  luther28  replied to  It Is ME @3.2.2    5 years ago

:)

I suppose that leaves us to select our liar of choice. Try NEWSY, kind of similar to PBS where you just get the news and you can draw your own conclusions, rather than theirs.

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
4  Ronin2    5 years ago

Witness tampering? Imagine the howling on the left if Republicans ever tried to do it. I am sure Pelosi will get right on this make sure Schiff is censored./S

 
 
 
tomwcraig
Junior Silent
4.1  tomwcraig  replied to  Ronin2 @4    5 years ago

You stole my thunder.  Isn't Manafort going to jail for pleading Guilty to Witness Tampering in part?  Why is Adam Schiff still walking free?

 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Participates
4.1.1  1stwarrior  replied to  tomwcraig @4.1    5 years ago

OUCH - damn facts will get in the way again Tom.

 
 

Who is online


Kavika
Jeremy Retired in NC


84 visitors