People Who Have Screamed 'Racism' For Decades Wonder Why No One Is Listening To Them About Trump

  
Via:  badfish-hd-h-u  •  4 weeks ago  •  192 comments

People Who Have Screamed 'Racism' For Decades Wonder Why No One Is Listening To Them About Trump

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


U.S.—Many on the left are extremely concerned with the racist behavior of President Trump, especially with recent remarks telling non-white citizens to “go back” where they came from, and are trying to raise the alarm bells about how harmful that behavior is. The problem is, no one seems to be paying them any attention, despite the fact that they’re very experienced in warning people about racism, since they’ve done it about absolutely everything for decades straight.

“I don’t know what’s going on,” said left-wing activist Ryan Weber. “Every day for years and years we’ve been yelling about racist things, from words to symbols to holidays to breakfast cereals to every single Republican ever, and we just assumed everyone was carefully taking notes every time we spoke up, but it seems like no one was paying attention at all.”

This is very troubling to the left, because they think Trump is even more racist than the usual things they have labeled as racist, but they’re not sure how to express that. “I mean, we compared John McCain to George Wallace,” stated Democrat Maggie Wilkins, “and I’m not sure who to compare Trump to in order to show he’s an even more worser racist.”

Activists are considering coming up with other words to express that Trump is a worse kind of racist. They considered “white supremacist,” but they’ve been using that a lot lately, so it would only mean to most people that Trump is as bad as the Betsy Ross flag. So they tried to invent a new term -- double plus racist -- to express how extra racist Trump is, but then remembered they already used that on Mitt Romney.

Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
Find text within the comments Find 
 
†hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh
1  seeder  †hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh    4 weeks ago

320

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
1.1  igknorantzrulz  replied to  †hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh @1    4 weeks ago

i thought Trump would be more into

.

Community Chest

.

 
 
 
†hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh
1.1.1  seeder  †hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh  replied to  igknorantzrulz @1.1    4 weeks ago

Epstein and Clinton preferred no chest.

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
1.1.2  igknorantzrulz  replied to  †hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh @1.1.1    4 weeks ago

thanx

4 keeping us all

abreast

 
 
 
†hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh
1.1.3  seeder  †hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh  replied to  igknorantzrulz @1.1.2    4 weeks ago

Always important to get to the tits of the matter.

 
 
 
Snuffy
1.1.4  Snuffy  replied to  igknorantzrulz @1.1    4 weeks ago

no, he didn't like to share

 
 
 
Tacos!
1.1.5  Tacos!  replied to  igknorantzrulz @1.1    4 weeks ago
i thought Trump would be more into

.

Community Chest

A socialist program? I don't think so.

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
1.1.6  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Tacos! @1.1.5    4 weeks ago
A socialist program

very good Tacos

i'm impressed with the way in which you use words, so as they, on point even, make a connection to the words i used.

 
 
 
Tessylo
1.1.7  Tessylo  replied to  †hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh @1.1.1    4 weeks ago

'Epstein and Rump preferred no chest.'

In general prepubescent girls are that way.  

'I prefer them on the younger side of legal'  Epstein and Rump

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
1.2  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  †hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh @1    4 weeks ago

"Reverse Racism!"

A tool for the intellectually weak and lazy when they cannot counter the fact that deep down, they just can't get over their indoctrinated prejudices.

 
 
 
†hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh
1.2.1  seeder  †hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @1.2    4 weeks ago

Yeah, no one is talking reverse racism at all.

 
 
 
Nerm_L
1.3  Nerm_L  replied to  †hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh @1    4 weeks ago

In a trans-racial society, shouldn't that be a victim card?  Even Nancy Pelosi was called a racist.

Donald Trump is an oppressor and Jussie Smollett is a victim.  The difference is as stark as white & black.

 
 
 
WallyW
1.4  WallyW  replied to  †hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh @1    4 weeks ago

The left has cried 'wolf' (or whatever).....like, forever.

Sensible people have pretty much tuned them out.

afb072219dAPR20190722054505.jpg
 
 
 
WallyW
1.4.1  WallyW  replied to  WallyW @1.4    4 weeks ago

“I mean, we compared John McCain to George Wallace,” stated Democrat Maggie Wilkins, “and I’m not sure who to compare Trump to in order to show he’s an even more worser racist.

Is "worser" even a word? jrSmiley_86_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Tessylo
1.4.2  Tessylo  replied to  WallyW @1.4    4 weeks ago

Like, for serious?

 
 
 
SteevieGee
1.4.3  SteevieGee  replied to  WallyW @1.4.1    4 weeks ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
WallyW
1.4.4  WallyW  replied to  SteevieGee @1.4.3    4 weeks ago

jrSmiley_100_smiley_image.jpg

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
1.5  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  †hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh @1    4 weeks ago

In my 64 years it has been my experience that the ones who scream racist first and loudest are in fact the ones that are usually themselves racist...

 
 
 
WallyW
1.5.1  WallyW  replied to  Ed-NavDoc @1.5    4 weeks ago

Don't forget the democrats founded the KKK, and fought the approval of the Civil Rights Act of 1964..

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
1.5.2  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  WallyW @1.5.1    4 weeks ago

Yep.

 
 
 
Heartland American
1.5.3  Heartland American  replied to  WallyW @1.5.1    4 weeks ago

Oh, we will never let them forget those matters.

 
 
 
Don Overton
1.5.4  Don Overton  replied to  Ed-NavDoc @1.5    4 weeks ago

Unfortunately for your comment there isn't a shred of evidence to prove  it

 
 
 
Don Overton
1.5.5  Don Overton  replied to  WallyW @1.5.1    4 weeks ago

Bull shit Wally

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
1.5.6  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Don Overton @1.5.4    4 weeks ago

Perhaps you should reread what I posted. I specifically stated it was from my own experience. As such I an not required to provide you any evidence to you to prove or to disprove. You have a good day now.

 
 
 
Freedom Warrior
1.6  Freedom Warrior  replied to  †hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh @1    4 weeks ago

I vote for double secret racist.  

Ladies and Gentlement I'll be brief.  The issue here is not whether Trump said a few mean things or took a few liberties with some hypergamous female groupies.  He Did jrSmiley_79_smiley_image.gif  But you can't hold a whole group of voters in contempt because of the massive success of a President has some left wing harpies losing their collective grip on reality while thrashing about with accusations of racism.   For if you do, shouldn't we blame the DNC, the left wing propagandizing media and the anti-American Obama acolytes as well.  And if we rightfully do, isn't this an indictment of the entire Democrat voter base?   And if you go that far then isn't this an indictment of American society.

Well you can say what you want about Trump, but we're not going to stand idly by and give credence to these people bad mouthing the USA!

Gentlemen!  Who is with me?

 
 
 
Tessylo
1.6.1  Tessylo  replied to  Freedom Warrior @1.6    4 weeks ago

I'm not a gentleman, but DA!  jrSmiley_91_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
WallyW
1.6.2  WallyW  replied to  Freedom Warrior @1.6    4 weeks ago

I agree.

A large number of the people really hate this country

 
 
 
Don Overton
1.6.3  Don Overton  replied to  WallyW @1.6.2    4 weeks ago

[Deleted]

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
1.6.4  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Don Overton @1.6.3    4 weeks ago

Proof please?

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
1.6.5  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Ed-NavDoc @1.6.4    4 weeks ago

Yep, just what I though. No guts, no glory...jrSmiley_9_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
XDm9mm
2  XDm9mm    4 weeks ago
“I don’t know what’s going on,” said left-wing activist Ryan Weber. “Every day for years and years we’ve been yelling about racist things, from words to symbols to holidays to breakfast cereals to every single Republican ever, and we just assumed everyone was carefully taking notes every time we spoke up, but it seems like no one was paying attention at all.”

No Ryan, we were all paying attention and determined that you simply came out of mommy's basement to howl "Racist" at the moon to placate your own racism and hatred and then crawl back into your little hidey hole.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
3  JohnRussell    4 weeks ago

Trump is a racist, but his racism is based on opportunism. In other words, what's in it (the racism) for him? 

He retweeted white supremacists many times, because he thought it would get him some votes. 

He perpetrated the racist birther hoax because he believed , correctly, that it would make him popular with the tea party people. 

 
 
 
†hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh
3.1  seeder  †hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh  replied to  JohnRussell @3    4 weeks ago

White guilt is nothing to mess with. It should be addressed just not publicly.

320

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
3.1.1  igknorantzrulz  replied to  †hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh @3.1    4 weeks ago

is that the brother who does Frankenstein...?

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
3.2  Trout Giggles  replied to  JohnRussell @3    4 weeks ago

This website that BF has linked to claims:

Fake news you can trust, delivered straight to your inbox.

So his seed is bullshit.

 
 
 
†hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh
3.2.1  seeder  †hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh  replied to  Trout Giggles @3.2    4 weeks ago

It's a satire site, it's seeded in the satire group.

It's going to be ok.

If you see it seeded in the zoo, it's probably not true. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
3.2.2  JohnRussell  replied to  Trout Giggles @3.2    4 weeks ago

lol, i didnt even read the article. 

 
 
 
†hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh
3.2.3  seeder  †hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh  replied to  JohnRussell @3.2.2    4 weeks ago

That's understandable, it wasn't a Russian collusion conspiracy.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
3.2.4  JohnRussell  replied to  †hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh @3.2.3    4 weeks ago

As soon as I saw it was yet another screed about SJW I glazed over. 

Where were the trannys? You need to step up your game. 

 
 
 
†hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh
3.2.5  seeder  †hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh  replied to  JohnRussell @3.2.4    4 weeks ago

It's not my job to find pleasurable seeds for you.

Google it.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
3.2.6  Vic Eldred  replied to  †hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh @3.2.1    4 weeks ago

You got to say it!  Can you believe it!

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
3.2.7  Trout Giggles  replied to  †hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh @3.2.1    4 weeks ago

Just wondering, because there's no group avatar at the top. So I don't know if this was seeded to a group or not.*

But thanks for clearing that up. It's just...ya know....some here will take this as the gospel and run with it. Then it's just a big ol' food fight

*I see now....the group name is hidden in the link. Dumb people like me don't look for things like that unless prodded

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
3.2.8  Vic Eldred  replied to  Trout Giggles @3.2.7    4 weeks ago
It's just...ya know....some here will take this as the gospel and run with it

Or...ya know... some might not recognize the satire and instinctively attack it. Fortunately only one individual was under the misconception that it was real.

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
3.2.9  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Trout Giggles @3.2.7    4 weeks ago
Dumb people like me don't look for things like that unless prodded

C'mon Trout, an honest mistake shouldn't 'Prod' U into claiming you're 'dumb' or 'stupid', or Steer you into being marked with a scar,let yourself B not so judgemental, so you can earn an A

whole lot more.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
3.2.10  Vic Eldred  replied to  igknorantzrulz @3.2.9    4 weeks ago
C'mon Trout, an honest mistake shouldn't 'Prod' U into claiming you're 'dumb' or 'stupid',

That should be the standard for everyone here. I'll look forward to you championing the cause! 

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
3.2.11  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.2.10    4 weeks ago
championing the cause

Which cause might that be Vic...

The Scarletter A, or Scarlet Letter A ,would have been my point, possibly do you wish to wear it ?

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
3.2.12  Vic Eldred  replied to  igknorantzrulz @3.2.11    4 weeks ago
Which cause might that be Vic...

The one which you so dramatically promoted....that "anyone" can make a mistake. I'm sure you'll extend that courtesy to others, or just liberals?  It seems like you are already telling us, aren't you? As Obama used to say "It's who we are!" Yup!

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
3.2.13  Trout Giggles  replied to  igknorantzrulz @3.2.9    4 weeks ago

Look below...Vic thinks I'm stupid. As do many of his buddies. I'm just trying not to disappoint

 
 
 
WallyW
3.2.14  WallyW  replied to  JohnRussell @3.2.2    4 weeks ago
lol, i didnt even read the article. 

That's OK, we hardly ever read yours.

 
 
 
†hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh
3.2.15  seeder  †hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.2.6    4 weeks ago

jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Texan1211
3.2.16  Texan1211  replied to  JohnRussell @3.2.4    4 weeks ago
As soon as I saw it was yet another screed about SJW I glazed over.
Where were the trannys? You need to step up your game.

And yet, you could not help yourself and stayed long enough to post.

Weird.

 
 
 
Heartland American
3.2.17  Heartland American  replied to  Trout Giggles @3.2.13    4 weeks ago

jrSmiley_91_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
3.2.18  Trout Giggles  replied to  Heartland American @3.2.17    4 weeks ago

It's one thing for me to self-disparage. And seeing as how we don't even like each other, you should probably refrain from saying things like "you didn't" after I said "I wouldn't want to disappoint" or replacing that phrase with a giggling emoji

Ya know....for a self-described Christian, you are actually very cruel. Do you think Jesus approves?

 
 
 
Don Overton
3.2.19  Don Overton  replied to  †hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh @3.2.5    4 weeks ago

So you continue to post lies, figures

 
 
 
Texan1211
3.2.20  Texan1211  replied to  Don Overton @3.2.19    4 weeks ago

Prove it!

 
 
 
WallyW
3.3  WallyW  replied to  JohnRussell @3    4 weeks ago
He perpetrated the racist birther hoax
No, HRC started that rumor.

 
 
 
†hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh
3.3.1  seeder  †hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh  replied to  WallyW @3.3    4 weeks ago

Actually John Podesta but close enough. 

 
 
 
Freedom Warrior
3.4  Freedom Warrior  replied to  JohnRussell @3    4 weeks ago

So you are saying he is playing his opponents like a fiddle.  Doesn't seem to jibe well with the Trump is an idiot mantra we so often see around here.

 
 
 
Mark in Wyoming
4  Mark in Wyoming    4 weeks ago

personally I think the term racist lost its "Bite" when people started using it and confusing it with the term bigotry, both can be equally as bad as the other , but a bigot can be a bigot  and not be a racist.

If a term is wrongly over used , it eventually gets ignored.

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
4.1  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Mark in Wyoming @4    4 weeks ago
If a term is wrongly over used , it eventually gets ignored

like Socialist ?

 
 
 
†hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh
4.1.1  seeder  †hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh  replied to  igknorantzrulz @4.1    4 weeks ago

Not sure about that as we have elected congresspeople that call themselves socialists and a few presidential candidates.

It may have been premature then but well it isn't now.

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
4.1.2  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  †hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh @4.1.1    4 weeks ago
we have elected congresspeople that call themselves socialists

They are often using it properly, it's their critics who haven't a clue what the word actually means.

 
 
 
Ronin2
4.1.3  Ronin2  replied to  igknorantzrulz @4.1    4 weeks ago

Or Nazi.

 
 
 
†hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh
4.1.4  seeder  †hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @4.1.2    4 weeks ago

Oh I see, ok.

 
 
 
Mark in Wyoming
4.1.5  Mark in Wyoming  replied to  igknorantzrulz @4.1    4 weeks ago

good example and true 

 
 
 
charger 383
4.2  charger 383  replied to  Mark in Wyoming @4    4 weeks ago

it has been worn out for a long time 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
4.3  Vic Eldred  replied to  Mark in Wyoming @4    4 weeks ago

It was a very strong term, it used to be one of the worst things you could call someone, but liberals have totally diluted any strength it once had after applying it to virtually everyone they disagreed with. However, they are having limited success using it defensively. The liberal construct known as "women of color" is a perfect example. You see, that term implies so many things: The victim status of the women, their experiences & their virtue, while invalidating the arguments of the non-women of color - the white!
It will be a while before they wear out that one!

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
4.3.1  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.3    4 weeks ago
while invalidating the arguments of the non-women of color - the white!

A non-woman of color, would be a Man, possibly a Brown or Black Man, in the way it is written,  no ?

As non-woman refers to a male.

Of color, refers to not White

.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
4.3.2  Vic Eldred  replied to  igknorantzrulz @4.3.1    4 weeks ago

There is nothing you can enlighten me about.

There are 17 months left.

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
4.3.3  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.3    4 weeks ago
liberals have totally diluted any strength it once had after applying it to virtually everyone they disagreed with

I consider people "racist" who disagree with my belief that no racial group is superior to another.

Thinking you're superior, or calling someone a racist epitaph is certainly racist. But it's also racist to simply ignore the plight of minorities who are being subjected to unfair or unequal treatment under the law. It's racist to claim that those who aren't subject to such unfair treatment aren't being accommodated by the equality movement. Just because "women of color" are trying to stand up for their rights and be heard doesn't mean they are putting white women down or "invalidating" any complaints white women have. They merely experience all the prejudice and inequality white women feel with an added helping of racial inequity. The gender pay gap for women is that they earn 23% less than a man for equal work. But women of color make between 39-47% less (39% less for black women, 47% less for Hispanic women). Are they not supposed to point out this additional disparity for fear of alienating the white women who are making 23% less than men? Seems rather silly and disingenuous as are most of these claims that the word "racist" has lost its meaning. It's only lost it to those who are too numb to it and likely employ it regularly in their lives and just got tired of hearing people call them racists, they never actually stopped being racists.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
4.3.4  Vic Eldred  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @4.3.3    4 weeks ago
I consider people "racist" who disagree with my belief that no racial group is superior to another.

Is that what you really believe? 

Let's put it to the test:

A local Starbucks had a no-loitering policy. Should it apply to everyone or just whites?

Is anyone eligible to victim status in a hate crime or just "protected groups" (as Eric Holder used to say) ?

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
4.3.5  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.3.4    4 weeks ago
Should it apply to everyone or just whites?

Just old white males, waiting for the Female mailman, delivering male ordered brides, that they can groom into the young men they once were

attracted to.

Yea, it's pretty amazing how the Republicans have buried their collective heads in the sand with this clown. All while defending and excusing one who is a hundred times worst than your Russian buddies convinced you Hillary was.

The potUS should never be one stoking the fires of racism, yet this one does. He expresses racist sentiment in one hand, while claiming to be the "least racist person" one could ever meet.

Think on that 

Trump, the least racist person,  can you actually agree with Trump on this ?

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
4.3.6  Vic Eldred  replied to  igknorantzrulz @4.3.5    4 weeks ago

You haven't been able to answer my simple questions. Just the usual anti-Trump Tirade!

Trump, the least racist person,  can you actually agree with Trump on this ? 

No. The point of that is what?  We had at least one President who was a racist. His name was Woodrow Wilson. There are some liberals who liked some of his policies. Somebody once asked me on the old Newsvine what I thought of candidate Trump. I was a Cruz/Rubio supporter back then. I replied that I didn't think Trump was electable, but if I could magically put him in the White House I would! I think he is the best thing that happened to this nation in the past 40 years. Anything that turns out those disgusting HATEFUL liberals is a blessing!

And BTW, I know somebody who was convinced he conspired with Russia.

 
 
 
Mark in Wyoming
4.3.7  Mark in Wyoming  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.3    4 weeks ago

like I said vic , it lost its bite.

personally I do not know nor associate with anyone who thinks the use of racism is ok, I have seen people like that and know they do exist , am I free to use my bigotry and prejudice to exercise my unenumerated right to freely choose whom I associate with and exclude them from my social circle? I think so.

In my case I don't see the color of the skin , but the content of their character and listen to what they say and how they act. That and that alone will dictate how I interact with them on an individual basis.

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
4.3.8  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.3.6    4 weeks ago
I know somebody who was convinced he conspired with Russia.

Only One ?

Just because U Can't let yourself see or hear, the truth about Trump, doesn't mean the truth isn't different than your perceived misconception.

Have you read Mueller's report in full ?

I haven't, and will not, as i've read enough, to know Trump is GUILTY AS SIN

, and was never "exonerated", just never charged, as Mueller never considered charging him, as a sitting POTUS cannot be, in keeping with DOJ guidelines, but you just keep on believing the LIAR in Chief, it makes you look and sound so gullible to some others, but hey Vic, you have plenty of Trump cheerleaders to converse with about your perverse  shared views.  

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
4.3.9  Vic Eldred  replied to  Mark in Wyoming @4.3.7    4 weeks ago

Well said. BTW look how far we have come as a nation. Remember when we used to actually see or hear acts of racism? Just think of the offhand discriminatory comments we might hear from someone or the racist or ethnic jokes that were once prevalent in our society. How long has it been since we have experienced any of that?  

 
 
 
CB
4.3.10  CB   replied to  Vic Eldred @4.3    4 weeks ago

Yeah, well try using it yourself and see if it is impotent. And, I know a conservative man is not rising to the occasion to speechify on the cause of suffering women (of any color): Just pay women equal to their abilities and get out of their way!

 
 
 
Mark in Wyoming
4.3.11  Mark in Wyoming  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.3.9    4 weeks ago
ethnic jokes that were once prevalent in our society.

 man its been DECADES since I have heard a good polish joke , funny thing is the one that always told them to me was a polish holocaust survivor, he told old jokes but knew I was a young audience so even though corney , they were still funny since I hadn't heard them before, I miss that man , may he rest in peace, of all the people I have met in my life, he was the one that taught me not to take myself to seriously.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
4.3.12  Vic Eldred  replied to  igknorantzrulz @4.3.8    4 weeks ago
Only One ?

You know who that was directed to. Somebody I have a wager with. There is another notable Russia conspiracy believer who appears to lave left us. Remember the one who supposedly worked in the federal government and used to write an article once a month? He was so sure that the Mueller Report would bring down the curtain on Trump. He's been long gone since the report was released.

Just because U Can't let yourself see or hear, the truth about Trump, doesn't mean the truth isn't different than your perceived misconception.

I see Trump clearly, with ALL his many flaws and his many successes!

I haven't, and will not, as i've read enough, to know Trump is GUILTY AS SIN

The GUILTY are about to be exposed and they better be prosecuted!


 and was never "exonerated", just never charged, as Mueller never considered charging him, as a sitting POTUS cannot be, in keeping with DOJ guidelines

That will be the first question democrats will ask Mueller on Wednesday - "Was it because of nothing else than DOJ policy that prevented you from indicting the President?"  I hate to reveal another prophecy, but Mueller cannot answer "yes" because he has already written & stated that he and his liberal team never considered the legality of that issue. The problem will be when Republicans question him and ask "when he knew that Trump was not involved in a conspiracy with the Russians?"  That answer will lead to some damning questions. I'm sure the delay in Mueller coming forward is related to that. They got to prepare the POS!

Don't forget - a six month self imposed suspension!

 
 
 
CB
4.3.13  CB   replied to  igknorantzrulz @4.3.5    4 weeks ago
The potUS should never be one stoking the fires of racism, yet this one does. He expresses racist sentiment in one hand, while claiming to be the "least racist person" one could ever meet. Think on that. Trump, the least racist person,  can you actually agree with Trump on this ?

Well said!

 
 
 
Jasper2529
4.3.14  Jasper2529  replied to  Mark in Wyoming @4.3.7    4 weeks ago

Excellent post!

Unfortunately, Rep. Ayanna Pressley (a "woman of color" in The Squad) disagrees, and takes her marginalizing people beyond race:

During a panel discussion at the Netroots Nation convention in Philadelphia, Rep. Ayanna Pressley took a shot at the CBC. "I don’t want to bring a chair to an old table. This is the time to shake the table. This is the time to redefine that table. Because if you're going to come to this table, all of you who have aspirations of running for office," the Massachusetts Democrat said on Saturday. "If you’re not prepared to come to that table and represent that voice, don’t come, because we don’t need any more brown faces that don’t want to be a brown voice." "We don’t need black faces that don’t want to be a black voice," she said. "We don’t need Muslims that don’t want to be a Muslim voice. We don’t need queers that don’t want to be a queer voice. If you’re worried about being marginalized and stereotyped, please don’t even show up because we need you to represent that voice."

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/aoc-squad-revolts-ayanna-pressley-says-no-more-black-faces-that-dont-want-to-be-a-black-voice

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
4.3.15  Vic Eldred  replied to  CB @4.3.10    4 weeks ago

Go tell Bernie Sanders

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
4.3.16  Vic Eldred  replied to  Mark in Wyoming @4.3.11    4 weeks ago

You know I can relate to that. Where I grew up there were only two types of people, those who came off the boat next to last ans those who came off last. The jokes went back and forth, but the jokes we laughed at were the ones about us!

 
 
 
katrix
4.3.17  katrix  replied to  Jasper2529 @4.3.14    4 weeks ago

That reminds me of a play I just saw about Marian Anderson and Albert Einstein. Marian initially balked when her friend wanted her to stand up for black people when she was discriminated against, but she ended up doing it - and performing at the Lincoln Memorial.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
4.3.18  Vic Eldred  replied to  CB @4.3.10    4 weeks ago
Yeah, well try using it yourself and see if it is impotent.

Sorry, I'm not in the habit of calling people "racists" just because I disagree with them.

 
 
 
Sunshine
4.3.19  Sunshine  replied to  Jasper2529 @4.3.14    4 weeks ago

I never have understood the people who talk as she does.

Why do black people think they can speak for all black people?  or Hispanic, or LGBT?

 
 
 
Mark in Wyoming
4.3.20  Mark in Wyoming  replied to  Jasper2529 @4.3.14    4 weeks ago

Reading that little snippet you posted , it seems to me she is worried about being marginalized without realizing for all her talk , she is the one marginalizing herself .

 
 
 
katrix
4.3.21  katrix  replied to  Sunshine @4.3.19    4 weeks ago

The point she's trying to make that if a minority wants to run for office, they should use that power to help their people.

And while I can understand why she feels that way, the problem with that is that she doesn't get to tell everyone else how they need to act based on their race, gender, sexual orientation, or whatever, and how being a minority should define them. The choice that works for her may not work for someone else. Just as the example I used about Marian Anderson - 2 years later she did decide to speak up - it was her choice. When she didn't want to be the face of discrimination, she was free to refuse, and she did.

 
 
 
r.t..b...
4.3.22  r.t..b...  replied to  igknorantzrulz @4.3.8    4 weeks ago
, and was never "exonerated", just never charged, as Mueller never considered charging him, as a sitting POTUS cannot be, in keeping with DOJ guidelines,

How hard that is to comprehend and yet so vacuously explained away. Unfortunately, the upcoming testimony will do nothing to convince the entrenched. Expect more of the same from the lame, placing the blame anywhere and everywhere other than where it originated.  

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
4.3.23  igknorantzrulz  replied to  r.t..b... @4.3.22    4 weeks ago
will do nothing to convince the entrenched

unfortunately  , U R correct

 
 
 
JohnRussell
4.3.24  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.3.6    4 weeks ago
I think he is the best thing that happened to this nation in the past 40 years.

Evidently Vic likes pathological liars, con men, crooks, buffoons and ignoramuses. 

 
 
 
WallyW
4.3.25  WallyW  replied to  Jasper2529 @4.3.14    4 weeks ago
If you’re worried about being marginalized and stereotyped, please don’t even show up because we need you to represent that voice."

And yet she ends up marginalizing and stereotyping people by race, gender, or both.

Not all members of a group think alike!

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
4.3.26  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @4.3.24    4 weeks ago

The MSM?

 
 
 
Sunshine
4.3.27  Sunshine  replied to  katrix @4.3.21    4 weeks ago
And while I can understand why she feels that way,

I can understand those statement coming from a political activist (although they do not speak for all minorities and think they do) but not a US Senator. 

A Senator should not disenfranchise anyone.

 
 
 
r.t..b...
4.3.28  r.t..b...  replied to  Sunshine @4.3.27    4 weeks ago
A Senator should not disenfranchise anyone.

Agreed. A standard that must apply to every elected official. Part and parcel as sworn in their oath to uphold the Constitution.

 
 
 
TTGA
4.3.29  TTGA  replied to  katrix @4.3.21    4 weeks ago
The point she's trying to make that if a minority wants to run for office, they should use that power to help their people.

Silly me.  Here I've always thought that Members of Congress were supposed to consider all Americans as "their people".  Now you tell me, and Rep. Pressley clearly states that the race of the Representative comes before their nationality and that "their people" are only those of their own race. I didn't see anything like that in the Oath of Office. Isn't that also racism?

 
 
 
CB
4.3.30  CB   replied to  Vic Eldred @4.3.9    4 weeks ago

Oh no you didn't. I think you meant that to STATE something positive, but I will have you know that it rears the UGLY head of something negative!!! And, it went right over your head.

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
4.3.31  igknorantzrulz  replied to  TTGA @4.3.29    4 weeks ago

Yes , you are being a little silly.

Members of Congress were elected to represent the peoples that elected them, and the sentiments of their constituents, not the sentiments of ALL Americans.

Do you think peoples in the midwest have the same outlook as those of Brooklyn New York or such ? Cause i think their priorities might be different.

I'll agree, since not everyone of their constituents is the same race and or religion, that they DO need to represent ALL of their constituents ( UNLIKE TRUMP, who ONLY panders to a confused White Base), even if the majority are of a certain ethnicity, religion, or race.

.

Note, i agree that a member of Congress should consider all Americans, but their priorities need to be in tune with the peoples who sent them to Washington to represent them, and usually they share some of those same attributes, as say  their constituencies race, ethnicity and religion.

.

I do not agree with the way she stated these allegiances, but i think we can get the drift, even if inartfully explained, like this post, by me.

 
 
 
CB
4.3.32  CB   replied to  Vic Eldred @4.3.15    4 weeks ago

You tell him - you have a gift of gab. Go. For. It.  All relics need to step aside-including liberal ones if it is the case.

 
 
 
CB
4.3.33  CB   replied to  Vic Eldred @4.3.18    4 weeks ago

No, you are just in the habit of droning on and on about propaganda du jour. This too will past, Vic Eldred. "The Think-tank knoweth."

 
 
 
CB
4.3.34  CB   replied to  katrix @4.3.21    4 weeks ago

You spoke what needed articulation. Even though it was so much commonsense it really should not have need stating. You took the time to put it into words. And that is what the Congresswoman did too. She took the time to try to shock her people who are carrying a form of betrayal too far out on the field - such that they are losing their connection to 'home' —wherever that home is.

She is saying to black and brown people don't forget you do have roots. That is, you can be with and do with whomever whatever you want, but at the end of the day it is the root of your being that forms and shapes your foundation in this life! Don't lose that as you go forth.

Of course, it's raw: It is similar to a dash of cold water throw in the face to snap some people back to reality.

Or something like that. I have not read her quote in days!

 
 
 
MUVA
4.3.35  MUVA  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @4.3.3    4 weeks ago

Racism lost its meaning because some white liberals use it instead of a argument.

 
 
 
Jasper2529
4.3.36  Jasper2529  replied to  katrix @4.3.17    4 weeks ago

I knew that the DAR, school systems, and others were involved in banning Marian Anderson, but I didn't know that she, herself, didn't want to sing at the Lincoln Memorial. Here's an interesting biographical summary of the event:

https://www.biography.com/news/marian-anderson-lincoln-memorial-concert

 
 
 
katrix
4.3.37  katrix  replied to  TTGA @4.3.29    4 weeks ago
Now you tell me, and Rep. Pressley clearly states that the race of the Representative comes before their nationality and that "their people" are only those of their own race. I didn't see anything like that in the Oath of Office. Isn't that also racism?

You clearly didn't bother to read my entire comment, either.

 
 
 
katrix
4.3.38  katrix  replied to  Jasper2529 @4.3.36    4 weeks ago
I didn't know that she, herself, didn't want to sing at the Lincoln Memorial.

In the play, it was when she wasn't allowed to stay at the Nassau Inn after a performance and spent the night with Einstein, 2 years prior, that was when she was first encouraged to make an issue out of the discrimination she experienced. Now, this was a play so clearly they invented her actual conversations; I don't know if she was really encouraged to make an issue of it in real life (although that night did lead to a lasting friendship with Einstein, who abhorred racism) at that time.

 
 
 
Don Overton
4.3.39  Don Overton  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.3.2    4 weeks ago

[Deleted]

 
 
 
Don Overton
4.3.40  Don Overton  replied to  Mark in Wyoming @4.3.7    4 weeks ago

[Deleted]

 
 
 
Mark in Wyoming
4.3.41  Mark in Wyoming  replied to  Don Overton @4.3.40    4 weeks ago

And that has what to do with what I said about how I judge people?

Personally I do not know nor associate with anyone who thinks the use of racism is ok, I have seen people like that and know they do exist , am I free to use my bigotry and prejudice to exercise my unenumerated right to freely choose whom I associate with and exclude them from my social circle? I think so.
In my case I don't see the color of the skin , but the content of their character and listen to what they say and how they act. That and that alone will dictate how I interact with them on an individual basis.

There is exactly what your responding to, to make your statement .

Which leads me to ponder , how do you define racist or racism?

The definition I use is pretty simple,  racism is using a persons race as a way to determine how one would treat them, a racist is one that uses the race of an individual to determine how they will treat someone. And to me using that definition , it doesn't matter what side of the political divides it comes from , or how they intend to use it. 

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
5  Trout Giggles    4 weeks ago

When I click on your link I only get to the Babylon Bee website, not the actual article. Why is that? Am I stupid? Am I doing something wrong?

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
5.1  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  Trout Giggles @5    4 weeks ago

Trout,

The Babylon Bee is a satirical Christian site. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Babylon_Bee

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
5.1.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @5.1    4 weeks ago

Good to know. From now on I will click on BF's seed button when I see stuff like this. It sounded like satire, but I had to be sure

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
5.1.2  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  Trout Giggles @5.1.1    4 weeks ago

Also look to see what category it was put in. Maybe I should see if we can make the category bold so that it's easy to see?

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
5.1.3  Trout Giggles  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @5.1.2    4 weeks ago

I learned something new. Thank-you. If you want to make it bold, that might be easier for people with old, tired eyes. It would be appreciated, but not necessary.

 
 
 
SteevieGee
5.2  SteevieGee  replied to  Trout Giggles @5    4 weeks ago

The article is satire.  "Fake news you can trust".  It's been kind of fun watching so many panties get so bunched up in the threads above though don't you think?

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
5.2.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  SteevieGee @5.2    4 weeks ago

I thought it was satire and when I clicked on the link I knew for sure. People are making snide comments that I don't get satire and they're the ones running with this article like it's the fucking gospel.

 
 
 
Jasper2529
6  Jasper2529    4 weeks ago

Playing%2BThe%2BRace%2BCard%2BA%2BWell%2

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
6.1  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Jasper2529 @6    4 weeks ago

Obviously calling people 'racist' after hearing a Presidential candidate call Mexicans "rapists", called Africa countries "shitholes", told American citizens to "go back" to where they came from and called those waving swastikas while chanting "Jews will not replace us!" "very fine people", is all because we're losing the argument. And it's true, we've apparently lost the argument that racism and prejudice are bad, that they should be avoided. The right has flipped the script and now embraces racism, they just claim its all against them as "white conservative Christians" losing their white culture because of perceived "reverse racism". And if you point out their racism they claim the word has no meaning anymore. How convenient.

 
 
 
loki12
6.1.1  loki12  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @6.1    4 weeks ago

Can’t agree more, can you believe an elected official actually believes clean, intelligent and articulate African Americans only occur in storybooks?

 
 
 
CB
6.1.2  CB   replied to  loki12 @6.1.1    4 weeks ago

Can you believe a clean, intelligent, and articulate Black American asked and was graced with that elected official to become his second officer? How about those two guys? Well-matched, too!

 
 
 
Ronin2
6.1.3  Ronin2  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @6.1    4 weeks ago

You have a few points wrong.

Presidential candidate call Mexicans "rapists"

No, Trump didn't call all Mexicans "rapists". He also said they are bringing "drugs", and "crime", and that "some, I assume, are good people."  Yes, some are good people, some are bring drugs, and crime with them. Including "rapists". Care to prove that statement wrong?  Or you could just fall back on the standby; "We all know what he meant."

https://www.politifact.com/virginia/statements/2016/aug/08/tim-kaine/tim-kaine-falsely-says-trump-said-all-mexicans-are/

"When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best," Trumpsaid. "They’re not sending you. They’re not sending you. They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people."

Now onto the next comment hatchet job by the left.

 called those waving swastikas while chanting "Jews will not replace us!" "very fine people"

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2019/03/21/trump_didnt_call_neo-nazis_fine_people_heres_proof_139815.html

“Excuse me, they didn’t put themselves down as neo-Nazis, and you had some very bad people in that group.  But you also had people that were very fine people on both sides.  You had people in that group – excuse me, excuse me, I saw the same pictures you did.  You had people in that group that were there to protest the taking down of, to them, a very, very important statue and the renaming of a park from Robert E. Lee to another name.”

After another question at that press conference, Trump became even more explicit:

“I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and white nationalists because they should be condemned totally.” 

I will give you that Trump called Haiti a "shit hole".  He was definitely politically incorrect.

https://financesonline.com/a-list-of-third-world-countries-10-poorest-nations-with-rising-economies/

While Haiti is a free market economy that basks in the benefits of affordable labor costs and tariff-free access to the US for their exported products, the island nation still suffers economically. Blame it on corruption within the government, limited access to education and career opportunities, and poverty. More than 80% of the Haitian population lives under the poverty line. The January 2010 earthquake, which jolted Haiti with a magnitude of 7.0 and turned Port Au Prince into rubble, dramatically set the country back in many aspects.

https://www.refworld.org/docid/5b3dd86f4.html

The above link is long, but a really good read about the breakdown of the situation in Haiti.

told American citizens to "go back" to where they came from

You would prefer "Love it or leave it"? But this is Trump we are talking about. Yes, he said it, and his supporters chanted it. It in no way removes the racism or stupidity of the 4 members of the "squad".  You may now defend them blindly, and hypocritically.  Just make sure you don't lose that "anyone that doesn't agree with me is a racist" outrage.

The right has flipped the script and now embraces racism, they just claim its all against them as "white conservative Christians" losing their white culture because of perceived "reverse racism".  And if you point out their racism they claim the word has no meaning anymore. How convenient.

Thank you for proving the point. Keep right on screaming; in case you haven't guessed no one really is listening anymore.

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
6.1.4  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Ronin2 @6.1.3    4 weeks ago
in case you haven't guessed no one really is listening anymore.

the ones not listening, are the ones who most ought

 
 
 
Tessylo
6.1.5  Tessylo  replied to  Ronin2 @6.1.3    4 weeks ago

No DP was correct on every point.  

 
 
 
loki12
6.1.6  loki12  replied to  CB @6.1.2    4 weeks ago

Somebody needed to bring the klan into the fold, not getting their votes without Joe.

 
 
 
CB
6.1.7  CB   replied to  Ronin2 @6.1.3    4 weeks ago
Keep right on screaming; in case you haven't guessed no one really is listening anymore.

Well now YOU are listening. And you are SOMEBODY. As far as your guy in the White House, here is a simple solution: Tell him to get off Twitter and let the nation rest from his state of mind. We don't give a damn about what he thinks is a shithole or gold toilet or beautiful woman. The job of president is about service not 'chatting it up' with his buddies on Twitter! And, one more thing, he ain't one of the boys anymore to talk trash at will. The presidency of the United States is not a "shithole" for him to flush into the streets of the world every: morning, noon, evening, and night!

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
6.1.8  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Ronin2 @6.1.3    4 weeks ago
"They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people."

So you would have no problem if someone said about your community "Yeah, you know where Ronin comes from, they have a lot of problems, they're doing drugs, they're committing crime. They're rapists. And some I assume, are good people."

I take it that is a true statement, correct? You do have people in your town that do drugs and have committed crimes and have raped, no? But that statement would seem to indicate, even though it doesn't explicitly state, that a majority of those from your town can't be trusted and are a blight on humanity. If you were from a traditionally minority neighborhood, say Harlem, then it would seem like someone was making the case for prejudice.

In the case of Donald, he painted the vast majority of Mexicans with the "drug runner" "rapist" tags, while barely noting that "some are good people". He was nicer to Nazi's when he called them "very fine people". Why didn't he something more along the lines of "When conservatives marching to protect confederate statues had white supremacists and Nazis show up, they’re not conservatisms best, They’re not you. They’re not representing you. They’re sick people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with them. They’re bringing racism. They’re bringing hate. They’re fascists. Some in that crowd, I assume, are good people."

Just being 'politically incorrect' would be a dream compared to the constant vile rhetoric this President spouts.

"It in no way removes the racism or stupidity of the 4 members of the "squad"

No, and neither does their poor choice of words remove Trump and his followers disgusting display of bigotry.

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
6.1.9  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @6.1.8    4 weeks ago
n the case of Donald, he painted the vast majority of Mexicans with the "drug runner" "rapist" tags, while barely noting that "some are good people".

and i assume, some are good people"

He wasn't rea;lly sure, there were good people in Mexico, as he had to assume it

 
 
 
WallyW
6.1.10  WallyW  replied to  loki12 @6.1.1    4 weeks ago

Yeah, Biden was in shock and awe of Obama when he described him that way.

 
 
 
loki12
6.1.11  loki12  replied to  WallyW @6.1.10    4 weeks ago

Isn’t Biden the idiot who said fire a warning shot into the air? Or said to fire your shotgun through the door, you don’t even have to open it? 

 
 
 
r.t..b...
6.1.12  r.t..b...  replied to  loki12 @6.1.11    4 weeks ago
Isn’t Biden the idiot

Perhaps you are thinking of Cheney, the idiot who actually connected. But we digress.

 
 
 
loki12
6.1.13  loki12  replied to  r.t..b... @6.1.12    4 weeks ago

There’s can be more than 1 dumbass at any given time, unfortunately. It it’s obvious that nobody ever taught Dick trigger discipline, But on a serious note, who hasn’t wanted to shoot their lawyer?

 
 
 
CB
6.1.14  CB   replied to  loki12 @6.1.6    4 weeks ago

Barely able to stand it, can you? And so you mock. It's okay if mocking keeps you from crying. You could not break the first Black American President and his Vice-President and so there is this continuous 'gnashing of teeth.'

original

 
 
 
loki12
6.1.15  loki12  replied to  CB @6.1.14    4 weeks ago

Again, what is the lefts fascination with skin color, are the lefts standards lower for a black President? That’s racist! Or are you amazed that a “black” man could do the job? Again that’s racist!

 
 
 
SteevieGee
6.1.16  SteevieGee  replied to  Ronin2 @6.1.3    4 weeks ago
"some, I assume, are good people."

What he meant here was that some, he assumes, are white.

 
 
 
Ronin2
6.1.17  Ronin2  replied to  igknorantzrulz @6.1.4    4 weeks ago

Sorry, the left has lost the ability to define what racism is.

They have abused the privilege.  They can still scream it; but the rest of us will ignore them.

 
 
 
Ronin2
6.1.18  Ronin2  replied to  SteevieGee @6.1.16    4 weeks ago
What he meant here was that some, he assumes, are white.

You are making the claim. Prove it. This is the reason people are shutting off the racist talk from the left. 

 
 
 
WallyW
6.1.19  WallyW  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @6.1.8    4 weeks ago

You're interpreting his remarks through racist filters.

 
 
 
Ronin2
6.1.20  Ronin2  replied to  CB @6.1.7    4 weeks ago
As far as your guy in the White House,

You think I voted for Trump? I voted for Gary Johnson. I don't do the "lesser of two evils bs". I even was a campaign volunteer for Johnson in my district- complete waste of time on my part I found out after the election. No third party candidate stands a chance against the Establishment.

here is a simple solution: Tell him to get off Twitter and let the nation rest from his state of mind.

You think Trump actually listens to me; or even any of his ardent followers? Trump listens to Trump. I don't think he would even listen to any members of his family. He would disown them first.

We don't give a damn about what he thinks is a shithole or gold toilet or beautiful woman. The job of president is about service not 'chatting it up' with his buddies on Twitter! And, one more thing, he ain't one of the boys anymore to talk trash at will. The presidency of the United States is not a "shithole" for him to flush into the streets of the world every:morning,noon,evening, andnight!

Then maybe you should work on getting someone else elected next time around! Of course with the Democrats insane exploding clown car of candidates running ever further left that might be hard. Especially when "Deplorable" now means anyone that won't vote Democrat. Trust me, as an independent fiscal conservative that tactic isn't working. I might break my own rules and vote for Trump if the left keeps pushing.

Till then you will have to put up with Trump like the rest of us. We might have him for another 4 years; isn't that a refreshing thought.

 
 
 
Don Overton
6.1.21  Don Overton  replied to  Ronin2 @6.1.17    4 weeks ago

Sorry Ronin the right right has lost the ability to lie away their racism and bigotry, as trump proved

 
 
 
Don Overton
6.1.22  Don Overton  replied to  Ronin2 @6.1.17    4 weeks ago

And you are trying to ignore it

 
 
 
Don Overton
6.1.23  Don Overton  replied to  WallyW @6.1.19    4 weeks ago

It's really too bad that people can't see the right except for their racism

 
 
 
Ronin2
6.1.24  Ronin2  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @6.1.8    4 weeks ago

Wow, bravo. You can't read something even when it is plainly posted for you.

1) Trump was talking about illegal immigrants; who are in violation of our laws once they illegally cross out borders. Not all Mexicans.  So unless the vast majority of Mexicans are illegal immigrants to the US you are flat out wrong.

2) Trump never called Nazis "very fine people" no matter how many times you repeat it.

3) "Just being 'politically incorrect' would be a dream compared to the constant vile rhetoric this President spouts."

What would you call Haiti? A paradise that people are dying to leave?  A hot tourist spot that Canada and other countries have warnings on?  A government that is so corrupt that it is literally fleecing its own people to death.

4) "So you would have no problem if someone said about your community "Yeah, you know where Ronin comes from, they have a lot of problems, they're doing drugs, they're committing crime. They're rapists. And some I assume, are good people."

Could you please tell our local police? Really, it would be a great service to us. We have an increasing crime rate- drug dealers are definitely using the public park at night; and I know of at least two houses that would qualify as drug dens (Which is saying a lot. Chances are there are twice that many.). Some of the drug dealers are rapists; they don't seem to care about the sex of their victims either.  The increased drug availability has lead to increase theft, vandalism, and at least two people getting killed in the bed of their own home. But since we are an upper middle class neighborhood we get only day time police patrols; and an occasional unmarked police car that will sit for a few hours at one of the park's entrances during their lunch break. We have been told our crime rate is much lower than neighborhoods surrounding us; so the night patrols are sent all around us. So we must have what "some I assume, are good people".

It would be appreciated so I don't get stopped ever again by a drugged out gay man stepping in front of my moving car begging me for help after he has been raped by his drug dealer!  Not a call that I want to make at 0130 on any night; or how I want to spend a half hour waiting for the police to show up! The police station is less than 2 miles from our neighborhood.

Satisfied? Will you make the call to the police? Not that they would bother to listen to you any more than they do to us.

 

 
 
 
SteevieGee
6.1.25  SteevieGee  replied to  Ronin2 @6.1.18    3 weeks ago

Nope.  I said it I stand by it.  You prove it's not true.

 
 
 
CB
7  CB     4 weeks ago

Steven Miller is an educated fool who appeared on Fox News Sunday and uttered this:

Let me be clear. If and when any one is acting like or is a fully 'erect' racist individual all the time and she or he thinks they will find cover behind plugging up their ears, numbing their conscience, or telling others they do not know when they are being treated unfairly, unkindly, vulgarly, or violently because of their race that FOOL has another thing coming.

You can't hide RACISM behind propaganda. No matter how long you try. It will expose you! Deal with that in your think-tanks!

 
 
 
†hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh
7.1  seeder  †hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh  replied to  CB @7    4 weeks ago

Whether you agree or disagree with Stephen Miller, that is not the guy you want to debate on live television. He tooks Chris Wallace to the woodshed.

 
 
 
CB
7.1.1  CB   replied to  †hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh @7.1    4 weeks ago

TPF are you serious? Chris Wallace was correcting the record in real time on Stephen Miller (I want to correct my spelling of his name now). Watch it again, please.

 
 
 
†hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh
7.1.2  seeder  †hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh  replied to  CB @7.1.1    4 weeks ago

If you watch the entire interview he clearly miffs the almost always composed Chris Wallace with rebuttals.

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
7.1.3  igknorantzrulz  replied to  CB @7.1.1    4 weeks ago
Chris Wallace was correcting the record in real time on Stephen Miller

I'll admit to not watching in entirety, but unless Chris completely fell apart after i stopped, it's as if another video was watched, far to often.

 
 
 
loki12
7.1.4  loki12  replied to  igknorantzrulz @7.1.3    4 weeks ago

While this is a reply to you, I’m just using it to make a point.

Dave, this illustrates perfectly what we were talking about the other day, a group of people watch the same thing and the winner is the person who fits your ideology.

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
7.1.5  igknorantzrulz  replied to  loki12 @7.1.4    4 weeks ago
the winner is the person who fits your ideology.

or,  the winner

is the one who ACTUALLY WON the debate,

by making a more convincing and compelling argument, 

but,

obviously, some are going to see what they want to see, and not always be an unbiased assessor. 

 
 
 
CB
7.1.6  CB   replied to  †hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh @7.1.2    4 weeks ago

Well, this is 'discussion related.' TPF, I thought you would appreciate the narrowing of focus.

 
 
 
CB
7.1.7  CB   replied to  igknorantzrulz @7.1.3    4 weeks ago

You're "on point," igknorantzrulz. I like that. (Smile.)

 
 
 
loki12
7.1.8  loki12  replied to  igknorantzrulz @7.1.5    4 weeks ago

You just perfectly reinforced the point I was trying to make, so thank you!

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
7.1.9  igknorantzrulz  replied to  loki12 @7.1.8    4 weeks ago
You just perfectly reinforced the point I was trying to make, so thank you!

Well,

if that is true, why didn't you vote it up, after all, i just better explained the point you were attempting, than say, you .?

 
 
 
loki12
7.1.10  loki12  replied to  igknorantzrulz @7.1.9    4 weeks ago

You didn’t strike me as being insecure and needing confirmation from others, sorry if I hurt your feelings, I have gone back and given you a vote.

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
7.1.11  igknorantzrulz  replied to  loki12 @7.1.10    4 weeks ago
You didn’t strike me

i would never strike a woman

 
 
 
WallyW
7.1.12  WallyW  replied to  †hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh @7.1.2    4 weeks ago

Yep totally destroyed Wallace

 
 
 
JBB
8  JBB    4 weeks ago

The damn gop wants you to believe people don't care about racism anymore...

That would be convenient for the damn gop with Trump running for reelection.

Except, non-racists do care and there are way more of us than in the damn gop!

 
 
 
†hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh
8.1  seeder  †hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh  replied to  JBB @8    4 weeks ago

The white crusader fighting other white people and relying on racist slander to avoid policy debate has become a bore.

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

 
 
 
JBB
8.1.1  JBB  replied to  †hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh @8.1    4 weeks ago

Talk of racism bores racist. Everyone else thinks racism is...Deplorable!

Try as you may you will never convince America that racism is now okay...

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
8.1.2  Vic Eldred  replied to  JBB @8.1.1    4 weeks ago
Try as you may you will never convince America that racism is now okay...

No, you have done the convincing! You still need a minimum of 39% of the white vote to win a Presidential election and you've driven so many of them over to the Republican party that you'll never win another one!  Thanks again for calling the good people of America deplorable!!!!

 
 
 
†hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh
8.1.3  seeder  †hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh  replied to  JBB @8.1.1    4 weeks ago

Things, no one said or implied. Thank you JBB.

Racism is certainly deplorable JBB.

I was referencing the lazy people that use it as a tool to avoid actual policy debate. It hits home when i say that because it happens all the time and usually inspires examples making my case.

 
 
 
WallyW
8.2  WallyW  replied to  JBB @8    4 weeks ago

There is no organized or institutional racism in the US.

It's a manufactured problem or 'crisis' invented by the left.

 
 
 
JBB
9  JBB    4 weeks ago

Having read their pro-racism line I approve the idea of the damn gop owning racism...

 
 
 
Tacos!
10  Tacos!    4 weeks ago

Hypocrisy is when: You believe it's wrong to mistreat someone because of the color of their skin. However, you think it's perfectly ok to mock and dehumanize Trump by claiming he has orange skin.

 
 
 
CB
10.1  CB   replied to  Tacos! @10    4 weeks ago

Those people in their skin color are not provoking Trump or the surrounding nations! A foolish president and his Twitter account! How come you can figure this out, Taco?!

 
 
 
Tacos!
10.1.1  Tacos!  replied to  CB @10.1    4 weeks ago

Is it ok to mock someone for the way they look or not?

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
10.1.2  Trout Giggles  replied to  Tacos! @10.1.1    4 weeks ago

trmp chose his skin color. He looks awful

 
 
 
Raven Wing
10.1.3  Raven Wing  replied to  Trout Giggles @10.1.2    4 weeks ago

He looks like he has a bad case of jaundice.

 
 
 
CB
10.1.4  CB   replied to  Tacos! @10.1.1    4 weeks ago

No it is not okay to mock people for the way they look. You really did not need to ask me that!

Let me put what is happening with President Trump in its proper context: What is he doing for the portion of the country that does mock him?

Trump on purpose: race-baits them; directly writes about 'em in tweets (with a world-wide audience in tow); lies to and on other authority figures; runs rough-shod over rules, customs, traditions, and norms. If someone was to politically 'shock' your world on a regular basis sooner or later you would have no recourse except to strike back (act out). He who does not want to be politically lampooned should take care to mind his P's and Q's regarding others. That said. . .Trump has not been burned in effigy yet.

 
 
 
Tacos!
10.1.5  Tacos!  replied to  CB @10.1.4    4 weeks ago
If someone was to politically 'shock' your world on a regular basis sooner or later you would have no recourse except to strike back

People should strike back in a way that conforms with the morals they say they endorse. I have no problem conceding that Trump's tendencies are juvenile and insensitive. Let's not be like him. Let's be better than him.

Trump has not been burned in effigy yet

Google "Trump burning in effigy." Although honestly, I don't have as much of a problem with that because I assume those people don't really want to light another human being on fire.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
10.1.6  Trout Giggles  replied to  Raven Wing @10.1.3    4 weeks ago

Jaundice you can't help....bad spray tans you can!

 
 
 
Freedom Warrior
10.1.7  Freedom Warrior  replied to  Trout Giggles @10.1.2    4 weeks ago

Oh look another Orange Man Bad club member.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
10.1.8  Trout Giggles  replied to  Freedom Warrior @10.1.7    4 weeks ago

and?

 
 
 
Don Overton
10.1.9  Don Overton  replied to  Freedom Warrior @10.1.7    4 weeks ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
Tessylo
10.2  Tessylo  replied to  Tacos! @10    4 weeks ago

What's humane about the orange toddler?

 
 
 
loki12
11  loki12    4 weeks ago

Why is it you never hear a republican say that “brown” Congress person?

is it because they don’t see what color they are and just consider them equals?

While the left is constantly pointing out their skin color, as if they are either shocked, or they are praising a child who did better than expected?

 
 
 
†hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh
11.1  seeder  †hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh  replied to  loki12 @11    4 weeks ago

The obsession over one's skin color is perplexing and counter productive if our mission is truly equality.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
11.1.1  Vic Eldred  replied to  †hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh @11.1    4 weeks ago

The left is totally committed to it.

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
11.1.2  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Vic Eldred @11.1.1    4 weeks ago
totally committed

I was once

but

i escaped

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
11.1.3  Vic Eldred  replied to  igknorantzrulz @11.1.2    4 weeks ago
escaped

Escaped?  That must have been a long, long time ago!

 
 
 
Don Overton
11.1.4  Don Overton  replied to  Vic Eldred @11.1.1    4 weeks ago

Your comment is a total lie

 
 
 
Don Overton
11.1.5  Don Overton  replied to  Vic Eldred @11.1.3    4 weeks ago

[DELETED]

 
 
 
CB
11.2  CB   replied to  loki12 @11    4 weeks ago

You poor thing, you've got to be kidding right? Think about it. It is not routine for liberals to go around the country waging "my America-my liberty-my patriotism," events. Conservatives are the preservationists in this scenario. It is conservatives who say, "Moral Majority," "Right-Wing Evangelicals," "NRA-er,s" "Reject sciencers," "Voter suppressioners." and "Log Cabin Republicans (A republican homosexual group)". All these things minority groups of people don't flow into in large volumes.

 
 
 
loki12
11.2.1  loki12  replied to  CB @11.2    4 weeks ago

What does that have to do with the lefts fascination with the color of a persons skin? 

I can never get an honest answer, why does the left think minority’s are too stupid to get ID’s to vote, but not white people?

 
 
 
CB
11.2.2  CB   replied to  loki12 @11.2.1    4 weeks ago

Really? What is the conservative fascination with wanting everybody to think in uniformity with Mitch McConnell ("hated it") and Donald Trump? Liberals are not fascinated with skin - for skin is uninteresting. The problem is conservatives, like Trump, can't resist the opposite attraction of screwing around with those different from themselves. In which case, a large proportion of those have 'colored' skins.

Dig?

 
 
 
†hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh
12  seeder  †hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh    4 weeks ago

Amazing, article of the day....satire....massive boo boos...

 
 
 
The Old Breed Marine
13  The Old Breed Marine    4 weeks ago

Great article, it says so much that needed saying!

 
 
 
Tessylo
14  Tessylo    4 weeks ago

Nope

 
 
 
†hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh
14.1  seeder  †hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh  replied to  Tessylo @14    4 weeks ago

Well with that convincing argument who could disagree.

jrSmiley_97_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
It Is ME
15  It Is ME    4 weeks ago

“I don’t know what’s going on,” said left-wing activist Ryan Weber. “Every day for years and years we’ve been yelling about racist things, from words to symbols to holidays to breakfast cereals to every single Republican ever, and we just assumed everyone was carefully taking notes every time we spoke up, but it seems like no one was paying attention at all.”

Apparently the word….. "ASS"ume…….and it's meaning, isn't in the "dictionaries for the "Left" ! jrSmiley_87_smiley_image.gif

But they do use the word …... bunches ! jrSmiley_13_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Don Overton
15.1  Don Overton  replied to  It Is ME @15    4 weeks ago

I find that republicans use that word more than anyone except for the teen set

 
 
 
It Is ME
15.1.1  It Is ME  replied to  Don Overton @15.1    4 weeks ago

Sure. jrSmiley_80_smiley_image.gif

 
 
Loading...
Loading...

Who is online


Snuffy
Dulay


65 visitors