It's Time To Throw Trump The Fock Out

  
By:  john-russell  •  one month ago  •  48 comments

It's Time To Throw Trump The Fock Out

The Wall St Journal is reporting this afternoon that Trump asked the president of the Ukraine, 8 times,  to investigate the Biden family,  and work with Trump's personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani in that so-called investigation. 

Trump should be impeached for this, and all of his other hundreds of corrupt practices  and decisions, and removed from office and gotten the hell out of American life. 

Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
smarty_function_ntUser_is_admin: user_id parameter required
Find text within the comments Find 
 
bugsy
1  bugsy    one month ago

But the Vice President of the United States asking the previous Ukranian government to fire the prosecutor looking into his son's probable illegal actions in that country, or lose millions in aid, is perfectly OK with you.

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
1.1  igknorantzrulz  replied to  bugsy @1    one month ago

what would it matter after the investigation was over ?

.

How come Joe ISN'T HIDING ANYTHING,

N

TRUMP IS HIDING EVERYTHING, WHILE OBSTRUCTING EVERYTHING

along the way

 
 
 
Greg Jones
1.1.1  Greg Jones  replied to  igknorantzrulz @1.1    one month ago

Well, at least Trump hasn't paid a bribe to a foreign government by secretly sending them pallets of cash in an unmarked airplane in the middle of the night trying to get them to change their behavior, which they haven't.

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
1.1.2  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Greg Jones @1.1.1    one month ago

no, he sends money, while LYING ABOUT IT,

to 

PLAYMATES AND PORNSTARS

and 

by the way

IT WAS THEIR MONEY.

 
 
 
It Is ME
1.2  It Is ME  replied to  bugsy @1    one month ago
But the Vice President of the United States asking the previous Ukranian government to fire the prosecutor looking into his son's probable illegal actions in that country, or lose millions in aid, is perfectly OK with you.

Of course ! jrSmiley_82_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
1.3  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  bugsy @1    one month ago

So, throw them both out of office.

 
 
 
bugsy
1.3.1  bugsy  replied to  Paula Bartholomew @1.3    one month ago
So, throw them both out of office.

Why? Trump has not done anything illegal.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
1.4  Vic Eldred  replied to  bugsy @1    one month ago
But the Vice President of the United States asking the previous Ukranian government to fire the prosecutor looking into his son's probable illegal actions in that country, or lose millions in aid

Not according to the WSJ story you are supposedly referencing. The story made it clear that the President didn't make it a Quid pro quo. He simply asked if they knew anything about what Biden's devious son was up to. For the record - The Ukraine got the aid!

 
 
 
lady in black
2  lady in black    one month ago

Dump Trumptard...he doesn't care that he got caught, he is a fucking traitor wanna be dictator

https://news.yahoo.com/trump-says-doesnt-matter-asked-150443660.html

Trump says 'it doesn't matter' if he asked Ukraine to investigate Joe Biden

 
 
 
bugsy
2.1  bugsy  replied to  lady in black @2    one month ago

So my #1 is OK with you, too...

 
 
 
JohnRussell
2.2  author  JohnRussell  replied to  lady in black @2    one month ago
Trump says 'it doesn't matter' if he asked Ukraine to investigate Joe Biden

He wants to show his brainwashed minions what they need to accept. 

 
 
 
bugsy
2.2.1  bugsy  replied to  JohnRussell @2.2    one month ago

88aa5a9708fe10faa3529b8420fc07aa.png

 
 
 
Greg Jones
2.3  Greg Jones  replied to  lady in black @2    one month ago

Is that illegal? Government leaders make deals and requests with each other all the time.

Isn't it illegal to spy on the presidents supposedly secure phones?

 
 
 
JohnRussell
3  author  JohnRussell    one month ago

Even one more year of such open corruption and disregard for our laws is too much to accept. 

 
 
 
XDm9mm
3.1  XDm9mm  replied to  JohnRussell @3    one month ago
Even on more year of such open corruption and disregard for our laws is too much to accept.

You're free to leave whenever you want JR.  

Personally,I'm looking forward to President Trumps reelection which will hopefully give us four more years of great news like the economy, jobs, trade deals, possibly a real peace and maybe even the formal end of the Korean conflict.   

 
 
 
JohnRussell
3.1.1  author  JohnRussell  replied to  XDm9mm @3.1    one month ago

We all know that you accept  and support a president of the United States that is a constant liar, a crook, a bigot, and a moron. 

Therefore everyone else should deal with you and respond to you on that basis. 

 
 
 
loki12
3.1.2  loki12  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1.1    one month ago
We all know that you accept  and support a president of the United States that is a constant liar, a crook, a bigot, and a moron.

You forgot murdering bastard...........You were talking about Obama the daft right?

 
 
 
XDm9mm
3.1.3  XDm9mm  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1.1    one month ago
We all know that you accept  and support a president of the United States that is a constant liar, a crook, a bigot, and a moron.  Therefore everyone else should deal with you and respond to you on that basis. 

Poor poor JR...  your abject hatred of President Trump and all that believe in his successes is the stuff of legend.  Not good legend mind you, but legend.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
3.1.4  author  JohnRussell  replied to  XDm9mm @3.1.3    one month ago

XDm9mm, I have accurately described you.  You support Trump, and he is a known liar, crook, bigot and moron. No one on my end  is mischaracterizing the situation. 

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
3.1.5  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  loki12 @3.1.2    one month ago

You know he wasn't.  Quit deflecting.

 
 
 
XDm9mm
3.1.6  XDm9mm  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1.4    one month ago
I have accurately described you. 

jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gifjrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gifjrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gifjrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gifjrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gifjrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gifjrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gifjrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gifjrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

Thanks for that, I really needed a good laugh today.

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
4  igknorantzrulz    one month ago

8 times...

, well, just MORE PROOF that 

Trump, would have NEVER WORKED WITH RUSSIA TO DEFEAT CLINTON !

.

WTF is wrong with people ? This many cannot be THIS FCKN IGNORANT !

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
5  Just Jim NC TttH    one month ago

Dems gonna need a few more of these to continue...................The rest of the fleet is worn out.

320

 
 
 
JohnRussell
5.1  author  JohnRussell  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @5    one month ago
President Trump  reportedly pressured the president of Ukraine during a July phone call to investigate the son of Democratic presidential candidate and former Vice President  Joe Biden .

The Wall Street Journal first reported Friday  that Trump told Ukrainian President  Volodymyr Zelensky  roughly eight times to work with his personal attorney, former New York Mayor  Rudy Giuliani , on the matter.

The president's contacts with Ukraine have come under intense scrutiny after an intelligence whistleblower filed a complaint related to his communications with the nation.

The White House did not respond to a request for comment.

https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/462378-trump-asked-ukraine-president-to-investigate-bidens-son-eight-times
 
 
 
loki12
5.1.1  loki12  replied to  JohnRussell @5.1    one month ago

Where is it in the call that rump pressured them?

This is what they say the call contained?

 A readout of the call from Ukraine said Trump was "convinced" that the recently elected government would be able to “quickly improve image of Ukraine,” and "complete [the] investigation of corruption cases, which inhibited the interaction between Ukraine and the USA."

Where is the pressure< you have to be low functioning to think this is significant and not a nothing burger!

RUSSIA!

 
 
 
 
bugsy
5.1.3  bugsy  replied to  loki12 @5.1.1    one month ago

In addition, if reports are true, Trump did not ask for anything in return, just asked to look into Biden's son.

Biden, however, did a little quid pro quo by telling the Ukrain government they would not get their billion dollar loan unless the prosecutor looking into his son was fired.

The prosecutor was fired, Ukrain got their loan.

THAT, my little liberal friends...is illegal...and threatening a foreign government for personal gain.

 
 
 
loki12
5.1.4  loki12  replied to  bugsy @5.1.3    one month ago

Did he also use air force 2 to help Hunter Biden launder a billion dollars out of China?

 
 
 
JohnRussell
5.1.5  author  JohnRussell  replied to  bugsy @5.1.3    one month ago

Why would the president of the United States be asking a foreign government to investigate the son of his main political opponent?  

Dont display how naive you are. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
5.1.6  author  JohnRussell  replied to  XDm9mm @5.1.2    one month ago

you know how to work an online dictionary.  Congratulations. Now we dont have to wonder about that anymore. 

 
 
 
bugsy
5.1.7  bugsy  replied to  JohnRussell @5.1.5    one month ago

Nice insult, not surprising, but I will answer your question anyway.

Because Biden was part of the main players in the Russia hoax. He was one of those that tried to get rid of the President simply because of a story based on lies.

 
 
 
loki12
5.1.8  loki12  replied to  JohnRussell @5.1.5    one month ago

Because he committed a crime? And Trump wants him to know that the US won't retaliate if they arrest and charge him like Biden said they would?

 
 
 
Greg Jones
5.1.9  Greg Jones  replied to  loki12 @5.1.1    one month ago

He's trying to clean up 0bama's messes.

 
 
 
XDm9mm
5.1.10  XDm9mm  replied to  JohnRussell @5.1.6    one month ago
you know how to work an online dictionary.

It was just so much easier than typing them out myself.   Copy and paste is a wonderful tool.

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
5.1.11  igknorantzrulz  replied to  bugsy @5.1.7    one month ago
in the Russia hoax

What Russia hoax ?

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
5.1.12  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  igknorantzrulz @5.1.11    one month ago
What Russia hoax ?

They refer to it as the "Russian Hoax" to try and deflect and defend their "chosen" mess-sigh-yeah.

It would be like Putin coming over to your house, raping your mother who has dementia while wearing a Trump mask and then leaving a "Vote for Trump" card in on her nightstand. Then, when you find out and ask why Trump had his sick Russian rapist rape your mother the Trump campaign and his supporters say "What are you talking about! It's fake news! No one can prove I asked Putin to rape your mom. It's all a Russian hoax!" and when you point out that Putin did in fact rape your mom, there was security camera footage of the act, and Putin admits that he raped your mom in an effort to get her to vote for Trump, and Trumps own son met with the rapists representatives when they were offering to rape people in exchange for sanctions being lifted, the Trump supporters continue to say "It's all a hoax because the MSM hates Trump!". The facts stand, Putin raped America in 2016, wanted Trump to win, spent a ton of money to help Trump, and was successful in manipulating those with metaphorical dementia into voting for him or at a minimum, convincing them not to vote for Hillary. Just because we don't have evidence that Trump knew about it and criminally conspired with Putin to do it, doesn't make it a hoax, your Mom still got raped.

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
5.1.13  igknorantzrulz  replied to  bugsy @5.1.7    one month ago
players in the Russia hoax.

do you really have the nerve to call this a Russian HOAX

further details, from that lil investigation, many around here claim produced 'nothing'! 

A total of      thirty-four individuals       and three companies were    indicted       by Mueller's investigators. Eight have      pleaded guilty       to or been convicted of      felonies   , including five Trump associates and campaign officials. None of those five convictions "involved a conspiracy between the campaign and Russians"   [9]       and "Mueller did not charge or suggest charges for  [...] whether the Trump campaign worked with the Russians to influence the election".   [10]     The investigation was, however, more complex. On May 29, 2019, In a press conference, Muller stated that "If we had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said that. We did not, however, make a determination as to whether the president did commit a crime... A president cannot be charged with a federal crime while he is in office. That is unconstitutional. Even if the charge is kept under seal and hidden from public view – that too is prohibited."   [11]

Lieutenant General      Michael Flynn   , who had been appointed as    National Security Advisor       by the incoming Trump administration, was convicted of      making false statements       to FBI investigators about his conversations with Russian ambassador      Sergey Kislyak     during the presidential transition, and he was dismissed from his position.   [12]   [13]       Former Trump campaign chairman      Paul Manafort       was      found guilty       on eight felony counts of      tax evasion       and      bank fraud   ,   [14]       pursuant to his earlier lobbying activities for the      Party of Regions       of former Ukrainian president    Viktor Yanukovich   .   [15]   [16]       He later pled guilty to      conspiracy to defraud       and obstruction of justice;   [17]   [18]       in total, he was sentenced to over seven years in jail.   [19]       In February 2018, Mueller's team indicted thirteen Russian citizens and three Russian entities, including the      Internet Research Agency       (IRA), for conducting social media campaigns about the U.S. elections,   [20]     and twelve members of the Russian      GRU       cyber espionage     group known as      Fancy Bear   , for      hacking and leaking DNC emails   .   [21]       In June 2018      Konstantin Kilimnik   , Manafort's business partner in Ukraine, was indicted for      witness tampering     at the behest of Manafort;   [22]       Kilimnik is suspected of working for     Russian intelligence   .   [23]       Trump's personal lawyer      Michael Cohen       pled guilty to making      hush payments       to      Stormy Daniels       and      Karen McDougal       in violation of      campaign finance laws   , and was convicted for several unrelated counts of bank and tax fraud.   [24]   [25]       Campaign adviser      George Papadopoulos       was convicted for making false statements to the FBI.   [26]       Russian gun activist      Maria Butina       was interviewed by Special Counsel investigators, then prosecuted by the      National Security Law Unit     and imprisoned for spying.   [27]   [28]       Longtime Trump advisor    Roger Stone   , who had met with a Russian person offering to sell derogatory financial information about      Hillary Clinton   ,   [29]       was indicted on seven charges and has pled not guilty.   [30]       Dozens of ongoing investigations originally handled by the Special Counsel's office were forwarded to district and state prosecutors, other    Department of Justice       (DoJ) branches, and other federal agencies. [31]

The investigation was officially concluded on March 22, 2019, with the      Mueller Report       submitted to      Attorney General       William Barr   .   [32]       Barr had been critical of the investigation before he became Attorney General. A redacted version of the report was released to the public on April 18, 2019. The report concluded that the IRA's      social media       campaign supported Trump's presidential candidacy while attacking Clinton's, and Russian intelligence    hacked       and released damaging material from the      Clinton campaign       and various      Democratic Party       organizations.   [33]     The investigation "identified numerous links between the Russian government and the Trump campaign", and determined that the Trump campaign "expected it would benefit electorally" from Russian hacking efforts. However, ultimately "the investigation did not establish that members of the Trump campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities".   [34]   [35]   [36]       The evidence was not necessarily complete due to encrypted, deleted, or unsaved communications as well as false, incomplete, or declined testimony. [37]   [38]       Mueller later said that the investigation's conclusion on Russian interference "deserves the attention of every American".

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
5.1.14  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @5.1.12    one month ago
The facts stand, Putin raped America in 2016, wanted Trump to win, spent a ton of money to help Trump, and was successful in manipulating those with metaphorical dementia into voting for him or at a minimum, convincing them not to vote for Hillary. Just because we don't have evidence that Trump knew about it and criminally conspired with Putin to do it, doesn't make it a hoax, your Mom still got raped

So, in so many words, Trump supporters are necrophiliac enablers, while Putin it in Trump, wood, also make them Sodomiser destabilisers. 

That is what i suspected.

 
 
 
bugsy
5.1.15  bugsy  replied to  igknorantzrulz @5.1.13    one month ago

Thankfully, you cut and pasted something from Wiki, so your post is semi coherent.

No one has denied that Russia messed with our election. It has been proven that Obama did nothing about it until after Trump won, then got desperate and threw a few Russians out of the country as "punishment".

Now, about your cut and paste, which of those your cut and paste cited were Americans that colluded with Russians? Pretty much everything you posted were Russians and Russian companies that Mueller knew would never step foot in the US for trial. Actually, we know Mueller did not even know what was in his report that he "wrote".

You can throw Flynn out there as your "proof", but nothing there that he colluded with Russians to change the election, just that he lied to the FBI. In actuality, there is evidence that the FBI agents that interviewed him stated that they don't think he lied. Of course, Mueller's handlers couldn't handle that and filed charges anyway. Those charges will probably be dropped soon.

I thoroughly debunked your cut and paste. Maybe you can try again...

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
5.1.16  igknorantzrulz  replied to  bugsy @5.1.15    4 weeks ago
I thoroughly debunked your cut and paste. Maybe you can try again...

WHY,

F U R Thoroughly Debunking it ? would i wish to watch a wrist cut into my time, and paste it when you pronounce it tomatoe, and eye C it as tomatoe ?

 
 
 
JohnRussell
6  author  JohnRussell    one month ago

[Meta]

 
 
 
XDm9mm
6.1  XDm9mm  replied to  JohnRussell @6    one month ago
removed for context

[deleted]

 
 
 
†hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh
7  †hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh    one month ago

In 2016 we had an election and she lost. It's time to nurse the butthurt and move on.

 
 
 
arkpdx
8  arkpdx    one month ago

This is just another BS article by the usual suspects. S.S.D.D.

 
 
 
Tacos!
9  Tacos!    one month ago

You can't just wait 14 months and vote him out?

 
 
 
dave-2693993
10  dave-2693993    one month ago

I am not sure how much is understood here about the situation between Ukraine and Russia, blah, blah, blah.

Putin wants to destabilize Ukraine and set things back to pre-Poreshenko days.  You know, the one who came in to office after we and the EU destabilized a duly elected government during our past administration...oh and that funny thing about war in the east and annexation of Crimea.

Now Poreshenko is out and Zelensky (a comedian btw, true story) is in, it is interesting that this reported conversation took place.

Two questions linger. 

What was the true discussion and interpretation...a constant probem under the current administration.

Would this conversation have taken place had Poreshenko remained in office?

I tend to think Trump may have tried to "muscle" Yulia Tymochenko had she won, and been tossed out on his ear.

Interesting bit of spice in the mix. Zelenksy wants to normalize relations with Russia. After all, not getting gas for heat turned on until December and then turned off on March 1st is pretty tough on the average citizen there.

Hmmm? Did a phone call, cause a phone call which lead to a phone call? Third one being Trump -  Zelensky...? Curious minds want to know?

Thinking we will never know.

 
 
 
freepress
11  freepress    4 weeks ago

The only reason this has become an issue is because the Trump "children" who are all adults are being investigated and sued for outside issues, some of these prior to Trump being elected. So in typical junior high spiteful childish rage, Trump has to go after someone else's son. His own son is implicated in taking illegal help from Russians to tilt the election. Biden's son has already been through the legal process and was found to have done no wrong.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
11.1  author  JohnRussell  replied to  freepress @11    4 weeks ago

Trump sent Giuliani over there to enact a witch hunt against Biden, who Trump rightfully fears can end Trump's reign of farce and idiocy. 

 
 
Loading...
Loading...

Who is online


Tacos!
FLYNAVY1


27 visitors