The Ukraine 'Transcript' Illustrates How Foreign Leaders Handle Trump: Flatter Him and Pay Him

  
Via:  tessylo  •  4 weeks ago  •  11 comments

The Ukraine 'Transcript' Illustrates How Foreign Leaders Handle Trump: Flatter Him and Pay Him

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


Politics








The Ukraine 'Transcript' Illustrates How Foreign Leaders Handle Trump: Flatter Him and Pay Him



f2d283c0-bbb7-11e5-a172-adb2f9451ed7_9df   Jack Holmes, Esquire   1 hour 43 minutes ago  






6a4b6104a928d2cfd824b9cb3ef7b868

From Esquire

What the president and his associates billed as a "transcript" of his call with the president of Ukraine is not actually a full, verbatim transcript of the call, so it's not really a transcript. There are ellipses throughout—particularly, as some have pointed out, when Trump is making requests of Volodymyr Zelensky—and the indications are that   a substantial chunk of the 30-minute phone call have not been included . Even still, the president just provided documentary evidence of what he'd already admitted to:   he pressured the leader of a foreign government to open an investigation into a U.S. citizen   who happens to be a political opponent, thereby inviting foreign interference in our elections. He put his personal political gain over the interests of the United States and violated his oath of office. He should be impeached.

Folks will now turn, with good reason, to demanding the full transcript—if it (still) exists—and calling   for Congress to get access to the whistleblower's complaint . It reportedly documents more of the context surrounding Trump's dealings with Zelensky and whether the demands for a Biden investigation are tied to the president's order to hold back hundreds of millions in military aid for Ukraine. That would be the   quid pro quo   Trump and his toady associates   like Lindsey Graham   are yelling isn't in the transcript, which is why Trump released it. ( He telegraphed this strategy   when he announced the release.) It's not yet clear there's no QPQ in the transcript—more on that shortly—and you don't need it for this to be an impeachable offense. But it's worth exploring further.

There's another side to the Ukraine call that demands attention, however. It has to do with how Zelensky approached his interaction with the President of the United States.   He started off   by very obviously flattering Trump:



  ZELENSKY: Well yes, to tell you the truth, we are trying to work hard because we wanted to drain the swamp here in our country. We brought in many many new people. Not the old politicians, not the typical politicians, because we want to have a new format and a new type of government ... You are a great teacher for us and in that.

Trump gushed in response, then went on a rant about all the problems he has with other European leaders and emphasized about how "good" the U.S. has been to Ukraine. Zelensky agrees with everything he says without caveats, and in fact works to boost his claims. He then mentions Ukraine wants to buy more Javelins—anti-tank missiles—from the U.S., and Trump responds immediately by asking for "a favor though because our country has been through a lot." This smells a bit like the kind of   quid pro quo   Lindsey Graham told me wasn't in there, although Trump does not mention Biden specifically until the next exchange. He did, however, repeatedly suggest putting the Ukrainians in contact with Rudy Giuliani and Attorney General William Barr for the purposes of said investigation.

7dbdf5b0bd858febf16b970705eb1752

But it's a bit later that we get to the emoluments:


  ZELENSKY:   I would like to tell you that I also have quite a few Ukrainian friends that live in the United States. Actually last time I traveled to the United States, I stayed in New York near Central Park and I stayed at the Trump Tower. I will talk to them and I hope to see them again in the future.

And there it is. Having flattered Trump relentlessly and nodded along to whatever he said, Zelensky came in with the tried-and-true finish:   I stayed at your property and put money in your pocket.   This is the way you do business with the United States of America now. You call up our president, tell him he's a very good boy who everyone loves, and then hint that there's money in it for him if you have a   productive   relationship.   It's very likely that this is now standard procedure for foreign leaders.   It certainly is for Saudi Arabia, and it is for corporate types, too:   T-Mobile celebrated its proposed merger with Sprint , which would need approval from Trump's administration, by spending a bunch of money at Trump's hotel in D.C. The CEO stomped around the lobby in his T-Mobile shirt, just to make sure the message was received.

This is not some intricate corruption caper.   The president has maintained his business holdings while running the country.   This is an obvious conflict of interest,   particularly when it comes to foreign actors . As   Vox's Matt Yglesias pointed out , Trump has vetoed five bills since he took office, and four of them were efforts to reduce U.S. support for Saudi Arabia. Is that because he, like many previous presidents, thinks we can't do anything to jeopardize our alliance with the Saudis? Or is it because they're putting money in his pocket? This is why the Constitution has an   Emoluments Clause , which forbids presidents from accepting sizable gifts from foreign leaders. Trump is accepting gifts every day, in violation of the Constitution, as part of   The Great American Heist . The public can never be sure he's made a decision in their interests as opposed to his own. It's just another reason he should be removed from office.









Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
smarty_function_ntUser_is_admin: user_id parameter required
Find text within the comments Find 
 
Tessylo
1  seeder  Tessylo    4 weeks ago

Yup, kiss his big fat ass and line his pockets, that's how you get access to this 'president'

This was most definitely Quid Pro Quo.

 
 
 
MrFrost
1.1  MrFrost  replied to  Tessylo @1    4 weeks ago

This was most definitely Quid Pro Quo.

Of course it was. He just didn't say it specifically, but it was damn sure implied. 

 
 
 
squiggy
1.1.1  squiggy  replied to  MrFrost @1.1    4 weeks ago
He just didn't say it specifically,

Aw jeez.

 
 
 
MrFrost
1.1.2  MrFrost  replied to  squiggy @1.1.1    4 weeks ago
Aw jeez.

He asked for a favor, there is your quid pro quo, in case you were looking for it.

 
 
 
MrFrost
2  MrFrost    4 weeks ago

I just want to know why the transcripts were written with a sharpie. 

 
 
 
Tessylo
3  seeder  Tessylo    4 weeks ago

18839192-7499559-Back_to_work_On_Monday_

This is off topic but look at Ivanka's tits, her huge fake tits.  Her only asset.  This was at the freak fest of religious freak fundamentalists.  Gave all those old perverts boners for sure.  Including daddy dearest.  

 
 
 
MrFrost
3.1  MrFrost  replied to  Tessylo @3    4 weeks ago

I heard she has a personal nipple icer to make sure they stick out. Looks to me like she is trolling for dick. 

 
 
 
Tessylo
3.1.1  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  MrFrost @3.1    4 weeks ago

I think Jared and daddy dearest are impotent.  

She's looking for a real man.

Is Justin Trudeau around?

 
 
 
Ozzwald
3.2  Ozzwald  replied to  Tessylo @3    3 weeks ago
This is off topic but look at Ivanka's tits, her huge fake tits.  Her only asset. 

In her defense, they have to keep the temperature low to try and preserve some of the older Congressmen.  I mean you try leaving out, at room temperature, an old side of beef and see how you like the smell.

 
 
 
freepress
4  freepress    3 weeks ago

Since Trump has a global empire of real estate and golf courses around the world, he knows of their corruption and has been in on it for years. He mistakenly thinks he can keep getting by with business as usual using taxpayer dollars to do what he did in private before being elected. He knows they are corrupt like him and speaks their coded language just like the mob.

 
 
 
It Is ME
4.1  It Is ME  replied to  freepress @4    3 weeks ago
He mistakenly thinks he can keep getting by with business as usual using taxpayer dollars

D.C. has been doing that for decades and decades !

Yet....we keep voting those same "Business as Usual" people back into "The PEOPLES Office"....hoping it will change !

 
 
Loading...
Loading...

Who is online



loki12
Krishna


35 visitors