White House has issued formal threat to Bolton to keep him from publishing book

  
Via:  larry-hampton  •  3 weeks ago  •  99 comments

White House has issued formal threat to Bolton to keep him from publishing book
"The manuscript may not be published or otherwise disclosed without the deletion of this classified information,"

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



The White House has issued a formal   threat to former national security adviser John Bolton   to keep him from publishing his book, "The Room Where It Happened: A White House Memoir," sources familiar with the matter tell CNN.



In a letter to Bolton's lawyer , a top official at the National Security Council   wrote the unpublished manuscript of Bolton's book   "appears to contain significant amounts of classified information" and couldn't be published as written.

The letter, which is dated January 23, said some of the information was classified at the "top secret" level, meaning it "reasonably could be expected to cause exceptionally grave harm to the national security."

"The manuscript may not be published or otherwise disclosed without the deletion of this classified information," the letter read.

Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
smarty_function_ntUser_is_admin: user_id parameter required
[]
 
Larry Hampton
1  seeder  Larry Hampton    3 weeks ago

The letter comes in the midst of  President Donald Trump attacking Bolton on Twitter , and Bolton's lawyer accusing the White House of corrupting the vetting process for Bolton's book by sharing the contents of the book with those outside the National Security Council's Records Management Division.

How much do ya wanna bet that the classified information is dirt on rump?

 
 
 
XDm9mm
1.1  XDm9mm  replied to  Larry Hampton @1    3 weeks ago
How much do ya wanna bet that the classified information is dirt on rump?

How much do you wanna bet that's immaterial.  If it's classified, it's classified.  Period.  End of story.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
1.1.1  Ozzwald  replied to  XDm9mm @1.1    3 weeks ago

If it's classified, it's classified.  Period.  End of story.

If it actually is classified.  Not just another Trump attempt to block bad info about himself.  Timing would indicate the threat came about due to the impeachment.

 
 
 
Sunshine
1.1.2  Sunshine  replied to  XDm9mm @1.1    3 weeks ago
How much do you wanna bet that's immaterial.

What's a day without another conspiracy theory from the left?  

 
 
 
KDMichigan
1.1.3  KDMichigan  replied to  XDm9mm @1.1    3 weeks ago
If it's classified, it's classified.  Period.  End of story.

Who cares if it's classified, We have the TDS sufferers to pacify, procedure's be damned. Now we get the if's and but's and more triggering from the TDS crowd.

 
 
 
XDm9mm
1.1.4  XDm9mm  replied to  Ozzwald @1.1.1    3 weeks ago
Timing would indicate the threat came about due to the impeachment.

Timing would indicate that Bolton just tried to get clearance to publish the book.  Do try to keep up.

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
1.1.5  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Ozzwald @1.1.1    3 weeks ago

If it actually is classified

Exactly.  I have no doubt that this is Trump claiming something that isn't true.  Even if his tongue were notarized, I still would not believe a word that comes out of his mouth.

 
 
 
devangelical
1.1.6  devangelical  replied to  Ozzwald @1.1.1    3 weeks ago

I'd buy a box of latex gloves if I was bolton, or be on the lookout for people with canes. bwah ha ha

 
 
 
XDm9mm
1.1.7  XDm9mm  replied to  Paula Bartholomew @1.1.5    3 weeks ago
Exactly.  I have no doubt that this is Trump claiming something that isn't true.  Even if his tongue were notarized, I still would not believe a word that comes out of his mouth.

Trump is not the one reviewing the book manuscript.  That is accomplished by a review board.

Hell, I had to submit and have my resume approved before I could send it to potential employers.  And, yes, I had to make some modifications to get it approved.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
1.1.8  Ozzwald  replied to  XDm9mm @1.1.4    3 weeks ago
Timing would indicate that Bolton just tried to get clearance to publish the book.

In December...

 
 
 
Ozzwald
1.1.9  Ozzwald  replied to  devangelical @1.1.6    3 weeks ago
I'd buy a box of latex gloves if I was bolton, or be on the lookout for people with canes. bwah ha ha

Because you think Trump will put a hit out on him?

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
1.1.10  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Ozzwald @1.1.8    3 weeks ago
In December...

Mmmm hmmm. And funny (strange not haha) that it wasn't leaked until AFTER the Senate's one week of having the Articles of Impeachment. Timing is everything.

 
 
 
XDm9mm
1.1.11  XDm9mm  replied to  Ozzwald @1.1.8    3 weeks ago
In December...

Is there something special about December?   It takes time to review a manuscript and determine if information contained in it is classified.

Here's a hint.  I had to wait three months from the submission of my RESUME to the Publication Review Board before I could send it to potential employers.  And further, once I got it back, I had to make modifications and resubmit it.  Granted the re-submission review came back in two weeks, but it's not something that happens overnight.  

 
 
 
Ronin2
1.1.12  Ronin2  replied to  Ozzwald @1.1.9    3 weeks ago

Trump is not Clinton.

 
 
 
WallyW
1.1.13  WallyW  replied to  Ozzwald @1.1.1    3 weeks ago
Timing would indicate the threat came about due to the impeachment.

The timing of the "bombshell" came about as an attempt to influence Senate trial.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
1.1.14  Ozzwald  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @1.1.10    3 weeks ago

Timing is everything.

Seriously? 

You know Bolton's team leaked the info to drum up book sales.  Of course that has nothing to do with the truthfulness of the claim.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
1.1.15  Ozzwald  replied to  WallyW @1.1.13    3 weeks ago
The timing of the "bombshell" came about as an attempt to influence Senate trial.

Bullshit!

The timing of the "bombshell" came about as an attempt to boost book sales when it is released.

 
 
 
MrFrost
1.1.16  MrFrost  replied to  WallyW @1.1.13    3 weeks ago

The timing of the "bombshell" came about as an attempt to influence Senate trial.

Just like wikileaks then, got it. Sucks when that shoe is on the other foot, doesn't it?

I hope the Senate trial drags on right up to election day. Keep trumps criminal behavior in the public eye as long as possible. 

 
 
 
katrix
1.1.17  katrix  replied to  MrFrost @1.1.16    3 weeks ago

Trump even said he loves Wikileaks!

Hypocrites.

 
 
 
Dulay
1.1.18  Dulay  replied to  XDm9mm @1.1    2 weeks ago
How much do you wanna bet that's immaterial.  If it's classified, it's classified.  Period.  End of story.

Another uninformed comment. 

READ the letter sent to Bolton. It cites Executive Order 13526 which states, in part:

Sec. 1.7. Classification Prohibitions and Limitations. (a) In no case shall
information be classified, continue to be maintained as classified, or fail
to be declassified in order to:
(1) conceal violations of law, inefficiency, or administrative error;
(2) prevent embarrassment to a person, organization, or agency;

In short, they cite a EO that specifically prohibits them from classifying information just because it's 'dirt on Trump'. 

 
 
 
KDMichigan
1.2  KDMichigan  replied to  Larry Hampton @1    3 weeks ago
How much do ya wanna bet that the classified information is dirt on rump?

Who is rump? Is that a made up term by TDS sufferers.

Any moron should know that if you are writing a book on your experience in the white house the manuscript must be checked for classified information before published. Here is the funny part, the publisher claims they didn't leak any part of the book but the leak came from the White House. Guess what traitor works at the NSC that is involved in the impeachment scandal?

 
 
 
XDm9mm
1.2.1  XDm9mm  replied to  KDMichigan @1.2    3 weeks ago
Guess what traitor works at the NSC that is involved in the impeachment scandal?

I believe you're referring to Lt. Col. Vindman, which is in error.  It's his BROTHER who works for the NSA that is the likely leak as it was his office that "reviewed" the book, but he 'claims' he was not involved in that review.   Yeah....  and I'm the Pope.

 
 
 
Jasper2529
1.2.2  Jasper2529  replied to  KDMichigan @1.2    3 weeks ago
Who is rump? Is that a made up term by TDS sufferers.

"rump" is just another immature grammar/middle school attempt on social media to demean President Trump. Others are tRump, Drump, and Dumper.    

 
 
 
JohnRussell
1.2.3  JohnRussell  replied to  Jasper2529 @1.2.2    3 weeks ago

My favorite is Tuck Frump. 

He deserves no respect. He's not fit for office and never has been. He is a tv game show host/ con man crook and pathological liar. 

 
 
 
Tessylo
1.2.4  Tessylo  replied to  Jasper2529 @1.2.2    3 weeks ago

I have to go to the bathroom now and take a trump

 
 
 
XDm9mm
1.2.5  XDm9mm  replied to  JohnRussell @1.2.3    3 weeks ago
He deserves no respect. He's not fit for office and never has been. He is a tv game show host/ con man crook and pathological liar.

Do you have anything else that you wish to share?  We already know you hate the man to the very core of your being, so your diatribes mean absolutely NOTHING.

The only good thing is knowing President Trump lives rent free in your mind 24x7 and hopefully is marching around with a few college bands in accompaniment.

 
 
 
Larry Hampton
1.2.6  seeder  Larry Hampton  replied to  KDMichigan @1.2    3 weeks ago
Any moron should know that if you are writing a book on your experience in the white house the manuscript must be checked for classified information before published.

Correct; and, Bolton is no moron. He very well knows this process. Do you think he is ignorant of that fact? There have been at least a dozen or more books I know of just of the top of my head, that have been written about this Whitehouse by insiders in just the last couple of years. All books have to go through the same examination. 

Do you seriously think that Bolton would try and sneak something harmful about anything but trump? That he thought, he just might, put truly dangerous material into the public sphere, past the eyes of the requisite analysis? Of course not. [Deleted]

 
 
 
KDMichigan
1.2.7  KDMichigan  replied to  Larry Hampton @1.2.6    3 weeks ago

It's awesome that you are such a champion of a war hawk like Bolton. 

Do you seriously think that Bolton would try and sneak something

Who said he was trying to sneak anything, I really hate when [Deleted] try to put words in someone's mouth. I understand your idolization of Bolton might make you think he is above error but I hate to break the news to you, no one is.

 
 
 
Larry Hampton
1.2.8  seeder  Larry Hampton  replied to  KDMichigan @1.2.7    3 weeks ago

I am a champion, of the truth. 

 
 
 
WallyW
1.2.9  WallyW  replied to  JohnRussell @1.2.3    3 weeks ago

You forgot "moron".

 
 
 
MrFrost
1.2.10  MrFrost  replied to  Tessylo @1.2.4    3 weeks ago

I have to go to the bathroom now and take a trump

Don't forget to wipe your pence! 

 
 
 
katrix
1.2.11  katrix  replied to  Jasper2529 @1.2.2    3 weeks ago
"rump" is just another immature grammar/middle school attempt on social media to demean President Trump. Others are tRump, Drump, and Dumper.    

While I generally don't like it when people do things like that, with all the childish insults that Trump hurls, I think it's just fine to return the favor to Deranged Donnie.

The other one that I approve of is calling Santorum "frothy mix" - which I probably shouldn't, but it just cracks me up, and I think it was well deserved.

 
 
 
Tessylo
1.2.12  Tessylo  replied to  WallyW @1.2.9    3 weeks ago
'You forgot "moron".

Thanks for the reminder.

He's a fucking moron

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
1.2.13  Trout Giggles  replied to  Jasper2529 @1.2.2    3 weeks ago

You never say anything to people who called Obama, Obammy now do ya?

 
 
 
Dulay
1.2.14  Dulay  replied to  Larry Hampton @1.2.6    2 weeks ago

This isn't the first book that Bolton has had to vet before publishing. His 2007 book had to be vetted. Add that to the fact that Simon and Schuster isn't some fly by night publisher. They have plenty of experience with this kind of book AND how to get it quickly vetted and released. 

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
1.2.15  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Jasper2529 @1.2.2    2 weeks ago

As long as your side uses...abuela, shifty, and sleepy to demean certain politicians, spare us the mock indignation.  Your hero demeans others daily when he tweets.

 
 
 
squiggy
1.3  squiggy  replied to  Larry Hampton @1    3 weeks ago

"Bolton's lawyer accusing the White House of corrupting the vetting process for Bolton's book by sharing the contents of the book..."

That's what happened? Trump's team spread the damning story to the dems? 

Here's your prize.

 
 
 
XDm9mm
2  XDm9mm    3 weeks ago

There's no threat.  Simply a demand that certain information be deleted prior to publication;

In the letter to the lawyer, Charles Cooper, dated Jan. 23, a National Security Council aide wrote: "Based on our preliminary review, the manuscript appears to contain significant amounts of classified information. It also appears that some of this classified information is at the top-secret level."
"The manuscript may not be published or otherwise disclosed without the deletion of this classified information, " added Ellen Knight, NSC senior director for records, access and information security management.

Source:  https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/white-house-seeks-to-block-publication-of-boltons-book-demands-classified-info-be-removed-first/ar-BBZs0IO?li=BBnb7Kz&ocid=BHEA000

 
 
 
KDMichigan
2.1  KDMichigan  replied to  XDm9mm @2    3 weeks ago
There's no threat. 

Well it is a CNN article so using hyperbole in a headline to grab the attention of the easily triggered is mandatory. 

In the letter to the lawyer, Charles Cooper, dated Jan. 23, a National Security Council aide wrote: "Based on our preliminary review, the manuscript appears to contain significant amounts of classified information. It also appears that some of this classified information is at the top-secret level." 
"The manuscript may not be published or otherwise disclosed without the deletion of this classified information, " added Ellen Knight, NSC senior director for records, access and information security management.

OMG I can't believe they threatened Bolton like that. President Trump needs to be removed immediately...

256

 
 
 
Larry Hampton
2.1.1  seeder  Larry Hampton  replied to  KDMichigan @2.1    3 weeks ago

Sure they did.

They threatened to not let him publish his book. By censoring for political rather than national security purposes, it is a threat to the book, his book.

 
 
 
KDMichigan
2.1.2  KDMichigan  replied to  Larry Hampton @2.1.1    3 weeks ago
They threatened to not let him publish his book. By censoring for political rather than national security purposes

What a crock of shit. Number one you have no clue what was censored so you calling it political is just feelings, nobody cares.

And they are not stopping him from publishing his book, he was notified that some parts couldn't be used. You thinking that it is stopping him from publishing speaks volumes.

 
 
 
Larry Hampton
2.1.3  seeder  Larry Hampton  replied to  KDMichigan @2.1.2    3 weeks ago

Sure it’s political. It’s hilarious that some think, everyone is gonna be fooled into thinking that Bolton is attempting to tell dangerous state secrets, and that’s what’s being censored.

Censoring the book by ripping the guts (the “super secret” dirt on rump’s activities) out of it, is threatening it’s existence. 

 
 
 
KDMichigan
2.1.4  KDMichigan  replied to  Larry Hampton @2.1.3    3 weeks ago
Sure it’s political.

Again your opinion. 

everyone is gonna be fooled into thinking that Bolton is attempting to tell dangerous state secrets,

I don't know about everyone but obviously it fooled you.

Censoring the book by ripping the guts  out of it, is threatening it’s existence. 

Wow you must be very important that you were forwarded a copy of the book before it was published. 

 (the “super secret” dirt on rump’s activities)

Again who is rump? 

Definition of rump
1
a
: the upper rounded part of the hindquarters of a quadruped mammal
b
: buttocks
c
: the sacral or dorsal part of the posterior end of a bird
2
: a cut of meat (such as beef) between the loin and round 
— see beef illustration
3
: a small or inferior remnant or offshoot 
especially : a group (such as a parliament) carrying on in the name of the original body after the departure or expulsion of a large number of its members

I googled other definitions but I came up empty...

https://www.bing.com/search?q=childish+definitions+of+rump&form=EDNTHT&mkt=en-us&httpsmsn=1&msnews=1&plvar=0&refig=acb7dea1569e4859ff185ce54fc1b359&sp=-1&pq=childish+definitions+of+rump&sc=0-28&qs=n&sk=&cvid=acb7dea1569e4859ff185ce54fc1b359

 
 
 
MrFrost
2.1.5  MrFrost  replied to  KDMichigan @2.1.2    3 weeks ago
What a crock of shit. Number one you have no clue what was censored so you calling it political is just feelings, nobody cares.

Um, no. Pretty obvious that trump and his team of retards are doing anything and everything to keep evidence out of the Senate trial. If all these people like Mulvaney and McGahn can exonerate trump, why prevent them from testifying? 

If you were on trial for murder and there was a witness that could give you 100% proof that you had nothing to do with it, would you block them from testifying on your behalf? Never in a million years....but you endorse trump blocking people that can clear him? That makes NO FUCK SENSE AT ALL.

 
 
 
MrFrost
2.1.6  MrFrost  replied to  KDMichigan @2.1.4    3 weeks ago

I love it, for the last 14 years, the right wing has called Obama everything BUT, "Obama", now you get obtuse when someone does it to trump? Really? LMFAO!!!!

 
 
 
KDMichigan
2.1.7  KDMichigan  replied to  MrFrost @2.1.5    2 weeks ago
doing anything and everything to keep evidence out of the Senate trial

What does classified information in his book have to do with the senate trial? 

 If all these people like Mulvaney and McGahn can exonerate trump, why prevent them from testifying? 

Again wtf does that have to do with having classified information in his book?

.but you endorse trump blocking people that can clear him? 

Where did I say that, More TDS sufferers making up shit

Your whole comment has nothing to do with anything I said,  THAT MAKES NO FUCKING SENSE.

 
 
 
KDMichigan
2.1.8  KDMichigan  replied to  MrFrost @2.1.6    2 weeks ago

Hey there is hope for your "but Trump" fixation yet, you thru a but obama in there.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
3  JohnRussell    3 weeks ago

I dont think Bolton intended to destroy Trump when all this started (the book). But once Trump pisses him off enough that will become his new intention. 

 
 
 
Tacos!
3.1  Tacos!  replied to  JohnRussell @3    3 weeks ago
But once Trump pisses him off enough that will become his new intention. 

So you doubt Bolton's integrity and credibilty. Kind of makes him a bad witness for a trial.

 
 
 
squiggy
3.2  squiggy  replied to  JohnRussell @3    3 weeks ago
started (the book)

Of matches - just for play?

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
4  Just Jim NC TttH    3 weeks ago

Opportunistic leak of the content. Who the hell leaked it? And why? 

1.) We may never know

2.) Because Trump..................like always. SMMFH

And it's seems it's always the NYT and WaPo that are the recipients. Hmmmm. And now, the idiots are blaming the White House for leaking it?

https://nypost.com/2020/01/27/bolton-lawyer-implies-that-white-house-leaked-book-manuscript/
"Cooper added that he submitted Bolton’s manuscript to the National Security Council’s records management division on Dec. 30 to allow it to confirm that no classified information was included, something that is standard for ex-government officials who have written books.
“We submitted the manuscript … on the assurance that the ‘process of reviewing submitted materials is restricted to those career government officials and employees regularly charged with responsibility for such reviews’ and that the ‘contents of Ambassador Bolton’s manuscript will not be reviewed or otherwise disclosed to any persons not regularly involved in that process.'”
In the Dec. 30 letter, which Cooper released a copy of along with his statement, he asked the White House to expedite the review process due to the “highly time-sensitive” publishing schedule.

What schedule was that? Get it in someone's hands that will leak it so we can fuck up the impeachment trial with bullshit isn't a reputable "schedule".

 
 
 
JohnRussell
4.1  JohnRussell  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @4    3 weeks ago

You guys worry about every leak except the giant one between Trump's ears. 

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
4.1.1  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  JohnRussell @4.1    3 weeks ago
You guys worry about every leak except the giant one between Trump's ears.

"That makes no sense"..........................

 
 
 
Ronin2
4.1.2  Ronin2  replied to  JohnRussell @4.1    3 weeks ago

The left ignores every security leak and glorifies the leakers. So long as it is anti Trump it is taken as gospel. 

 
 
 
XDm9mm
4.2  XDm9mm  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @4    3 weeks ago
Who the hell leaked it? And why?

Just a guess, but can anyone spell Vindman?  And no not the Lt.Col. one.  His brother!!

 
 
 
KDMichigan
4.2.1  KDMichigan  replied to  XDm9mm @4.2    3 weeks ago
His brother!!

True that, and a twin to boot.

256

 
 
 
XDm9mm
4.2.2  XDm9mm  replied to  KDMichigan @4.2.1    3 weeks ago
True that, and a twin to boot.

Have you noticed a striking similarity between the one in the suit (granted they're twins but the uniform makes a slightly different appearance) and that other idiot the Democrats are trying to promote, Lev Parnas?   Relatives?  They are after all, all Ukrainians.

 
 
 
Jasper2529
4.2.3  Jasper2529  replied to  XDm9mm @4.2    3 weeks ago
Just a guess, but can anyone spell Vindman?  And no not the Lt.Col. one.  His brother!!

Yevgeny, the twin brother, is also a Lt.Col. His office is allegedly across the hall from Alexander.

 
 
 
Tacos!
5  Tacos!    3 weeks ago
White House Has Issued Formal Threat

CNN has lost its collective mind. Exactly how is this letter a threat? The story doesn't even say. It's ordinary boilerplate and part of the standard process the White House always goes through when reviewing manuscripts.

Insanity like this is why we have this impeachment nonsense going on - i.e. the tendency to make mountains out of molehills.

Remember when CNN was a news channel? This is embarrassing.

 
 
 
Tacos!
6  Tacos!    3 weeks ago

This headline is the very definition of "fake news." The assertion that the White House has formally threatened Mr. Bolton is 100% made up.

 
 
 
XDm9mm
6.1  XDm9mm  replied to  Tacos! @6    3 weeks ago
The assertion that the White House has formally threatened Mr. Bolton is 100% made up.

It is a CNN article so what would one expect?  The truth?

 
 
 
Tacos!
6.1.1  Tacos!  replied to  XDm9mm @6.1    3 weeks ago
It is a CNN article so what would one expect?  The truth?

I know but this is truly amazing. Jake Tapper wrote this article. I wonder if he is responsible for the title as well.

 
 
 
Larry Hampton
7  seeder  Larry Hampton    3 weeks ago

tenor.gif?itemid=9271200

tds, fakenews, msm, hate, omg, conspiracy theory, conspiracy theory, meme, meme, meme...

Oh...

...never mind me; just compiling a list of the Conservative talking points presented thus far.

 
 
 
KDMichigan
7.1  KDMichigan  replied to  Larry Hampton @7    3 weeks ago
.never mind me; just compiling a list of the Conservative talking points presented thus far.

Seems to me every "Conservative" discussed your seed. 

I myself couldn't help but notice you like the comments that have nothing to do with it though...fucking Hillaryious.

And gee I don't see one meme, just more fake news.

256

 
 
 
Larry Hampton
7.1.1  seeder  Larry Hampton  replied to  KDMichigan @7.1    3 weeks ago

I dunno,,,it’s about the hundredth time I’ve seen you use the ol’ Dos Equis dude and the little confused girl ,,,

There’s Lottsa pictures, gifs, and memes out there; variety is the spice of life. 
Perhaps the same ol’ same ol’ brings ya a measure of security though; so, more power to the boring I guess...

 
 
 
KDMichigan
7.1.2  KDMichigan  replied to  Larry Hampton @7.1.1    3 weeks ago
I dunno,,

You don't know? Please show us one meme in the comments on your seed?

There’s Lottsa pictures, gifs, and memes out there; variety is the spice of life. 

What does that have to do with your claim of multiple memes on your seed?

more power to the boring I guess...

Thank god you can always fall back on hyperbole I guess....

 
 
 
Tessylo
7.1.3  Tessylo  replied to  Larry Hampton @7.1.1    3 weeks ago

All he has is dumb ass off topic pointless memes.  

 
 
 
WallyW
7.1.4  WallyW  replied to  Tessylo @7.1.3    3 weeks ago
"rump" is just another immature grammar/middle school attempt on social media to demean President Trump. Others are tRump, Drump, and Dumper
Talk about dumb ass off topic pointless memes.  

 
 
 
Tessylo
7.1.5  Tessylo  replied to  WallyW @7.1.4    3 weeks ago

I have to go to the bathroom now and take a tRump.  

 
 
 
Split Personality
7.1.6  Split Personality  replied to  KDMichigan @7.1    3 weeks ago
And gee I don't see one meme, just more fake news.

I counted 13, more or less. Your avatar, Just Jim's and Jasper's, memes.

jrSmiley_72_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Split Personality
7.1.7  Split Personality  replied to  Tessylo @7.1.5    3 weeks ago

I believe the correct terminology is "to put a Master Chief out to sea".

jrSmiley_72_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
KDMichigan
7.1.8  KDMichigan  replied to  Split Personality @7.1.6    3 weeks ago
I counted 13, more or less. Your avatar, Just Jim's and Jasper's, memes.

So 3 makes 13? 

256

How many meme's does this make?

 
 
 
Split Personality
7.1.9  Split Personality  replied to  KDMichigan @7.1.8    2 weeks ago

How many comments are there on this article with those three meme avatars?

13 plus your last one = 14

Cheers jrSmiley_5_smiley_image.png

 
 
 
Split Personality
7.1.10  Split Personality  replied to  Split Personality @7.1.7    2 weeks ago

Heard that one before Frost, LMAO.

Worked with a USMC CW03 who said that every day for 2 years. jrSmiley_54_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Tessylo
7.1.11  Tessylo  replied to  Split Personality @7.1.9    2 weeks ago

[Deleted]

 
 
 
KDMichigan
7.1.12  KDMichigan  replied to  Split Personality @7.1.9    2 weeks ago

Evan Larry had enough sense to give up on his hyperbolic comment..

256

 
 
 
Dulay
7.1.13  Dulay  replied to  KDMichigan @7.1.2    2 weeks ago
What does that have to do with your claim of multiple memes on your seed?

YOU have posted 'multiple memes' in his seed. 

 
 
 
KDMichigan
7.1.14  KDMichigan  replied to  Dulay @7.1.13    2 weeks ago
YOU have posted 'multiple memes' in his seed. 

What slow day Dulay? Show me a Meme I posted.

 
 
 
Split Personality
7.1.15  Split Personality  replied to  KDMichigan @7.1.14    2 weeks ago

800

 
 
 
KDMichigan
7.1.16  KDMichigan  replied to  Split Personality @7.1.15    2 weeks ago

What still reaching to compensate for Larry's hyperbolic comment? How cute.

Is there other ways you compensate for his short comings?

[Deleted]

 
 
 
JohnRussell
7.1.17  JohnRussell  replied to  KDMichigan @7.1.12    2 weeks ago

This gif of the beer guy shaking his head is pretty much trolling at this point. 

 
 
 
KDMichigan
7.1.18  KDMichigan  replied to  JohnRussell @7.1.17    2 weeks ago
This gif of the beer

Hey JR at least you have enough sense to know the difference between a meme and a gif.

 
 
 
Jasper2529
7.1.19  Jasper2529  replied to  Split Personality @7.1.6    2 weeks ago
I counted 13, more or less. Your avatar, Just Jim's and Jasper's, memes.

Perhaps you should count again. I made exactly TWO comments on this seed ...  1.2.2 and 4.2.3. NEITHER of my comments include a meme, so stop making up shit. BTW, I ignored the subsequent baiting comments and didn't respond to them.

 
 
 
Split Personality
7.1.20  Split Personality  replied to  Jasper2529 @7.1.19    2 weeks ago

Is your avatar a meme, Jasper?

Yes or no.

NEITHER of my comments include a meme, so stop making up shit.

Can you post anything without your avatar?

Yes or no.

BTW, I ignored the subsequent baiting comments and didn't respond to them.

I made no response to you at all here or elsewhere.

Enjoy your evening, Cheers.

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
7.1.21  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  JohnRussell @7.1.17    2 weeks ago
This gif of the beer guy shaking his head is pretty much trolling at this point. 

Using any intelligence or being original is pretty much impossible for some. Their entire existence is wrapped around sitting under these virtual bridges and jumping out every few minutes, waving their tired useless hairy meme arms around at anyone trying to cross a logic bridge in an attempt to extort a reaction which, if received, they take back under their smelly bridge and gnaw on to make themselves feel better. "Snort....yeah, I sure showed them with that same meme I've used hundreds of times... yeah, that was a good one, he, hehe, he...".

 
 
 
Jasper2529
7.1.22  Jasper2529  replied to  Split Personality @7.1.20    2 weeks ago
Is your avatar a meme, Jasper? Yes or no.

No. My avatar is a quotation, not a meme.  

Definition of   meme

1 an idea, behavior, style, or usage that spreads from person to person within a culture

2 :   an amusing or interesting item (such as a captioned picture or video) or genre of items that is spread widely online especially through social media

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/meme

Can you post anything without your avatar? Yes or no.

Why should I? I like the quotation that I posted for my avatar, and until Perrie tells me that I must remove it, I shall keep it.

 
 
 
Split Personality
7.1.23  Split Personality  replied to  Jasper2529 @7.1.22    2 weeks ago
No. My avatar is a quotation, not a meme.  

Well, per your definition of a meme, is your quote not an idea? Is it not a "discrete unit of knowledge" that you seek to share through social media per the definition you linked?

I think it is, very much so ( and a nice sentiment ).

You can agree to disagree if you must. But then I would have to ask if you are admitting that KDM's and Just Jim's avatar's are indeed "officially" memes by your definition?

I asked you if you can post anything without your avatar.  The answer is no.

You deflected and ignored the question.

Why should I? I like the quotation that I posted for my avatar, and until Perrie tells me that I must remove it,

Please save us the meta drama, no one even slightly implied that your avatar is improper or unacceptable to the forum or the RA or that you should change it.

I shall keep it.

Good for you. Keep a stiff upper lip, patience is a virtue, onward christian soldiers and all that .

Pip, pip, Cheerio. (again)

 
 
 
Dulay
7.1.24  Dulay  replied to  Split Personality @7.1.15    2 weeks ago

jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Dulay
7.1.25  Dulay  replied to  KDMichigan @7.1.14    2 weeks ago
What slow day Dulay? Show me a Meme I posted.

Since you're the one that's been harping about a meme for DAYS now, it looks like you're the one having a slow day. 

 
 
 
Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom
7.1.26  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom  replied to  Split Personality @7.1.23    2 weeks ago
Good for you. Keep a stiff upper lip, patience is a virtue, onward christian soldiers and all that . Pip, pip, Cheerio. (again)

jrSmiley_91_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
KDMichigan
7.1.27  KDMichigan  replied to  Dulay @7.1.25    2 weeks ago
Since you're the one that's been harping about a meme for DAYS now

Really Dulay, harping? Where did I do that? Are you trying to help SP compensate for Larry's hyperbolic comment now to? You are the spin artist, lets see how you can do.

256  

 
 
 
Split Personality
7.1.28  Split Personality  replied to  KDMichigan @7.1.27    2 weeks ago
What does harping on it mean?
Dwell on; talk or write about to a tedious and excessive extent. For example, She kept harping on the fact that she had no household help at all. This expression is a shortening of harp on the same string, meaning "to play the same note over and over." It was first recorded in 1518.
Harping?  Yes, it pretty much seems like you are going to harp on it until you get the last word friend KDM.
 
 
 
Dulay
7.1.29  Dulay  replied to  KDMichigan @7.1.27    2 weeks ago
Really Dulay, harping?

Yes, harping. 

Where did I do that?

Throughout this seed. 

Are you trying to help SP compensate for Larry's hyperbolic comment now to?

No I am directly addressing your harping. 

You are the spin artist, lets see how you can do.

You are the meme artists and your failed attempt to deny it by posting ANOTHER meme is hilarious.

 
 
 
KDMichigan
7.1.30  KDMichigan  replied to  Split Personality @7.1.28    2 weeks ago

Impasse

 
 
 
Split Personality
8  Split Personality    2 weeks ago
Impasse

An impasse may be issued in a thread during a heated discussion.  Issuing an impasse ends all discussion between the issuing member and the target member within the thread.   (For example, issuing an impasse for comment ‘2.5.2’ applies to all comments starting with ‘2.5’ between the two members).   To issue an impasse, the issuing member clicks on the user’s avatar for the target member’s offending comment and selects Impasse.   Both the issuing and target members will now see IMPASSE in place of the REPLY function. Impasses that are written out will not be honored. 

Note:  you cannot issue an Impasse if you have had the last word.   You can only Impasse on a comment that follows your last comment in the thread.   Also, you cannot impasse in a thread unless you created the thread or have commented within the thread.

So, in effect, I will accept your written Impasse by clicking on your avatar at 7.1.30 and trigger it myself.
That way the "reply" button will be replaced by the word Impasse.
Go Chiefs !

 
 
 
Dulay
8.1  Dulay  replied to  Split Personality @8    2 weeks ago

I almost hit thumbs up to your comment but then you had to finish with Go Chiefs!

Go Niners!

 
 
 
Split Personality
8.1.1  Split Personality  replied to  Dulay @8.1    2 weeks ago

Well I still have my old 49ers Jersey which I will drag out,

but I am more of an Andy Reid fan, ( Eagles fan ) and wish he gets a Super Bowl ring before he retires.

 
 
 
Dulay
8.1.2  Dulay  replied to  Split Personality @8.1.1    2 weeks ago

When I lived in CA I wore my Bears cap, never an issue but much sympathy. When I came home for Christmas, I donned my 49ers cap and caught shit when I got on the plane. Put my Bears cap back on when I got off the plane in San Francisco. I still have my 34 'Sweetness' Jersey though it doesn't fit anymore. 

 
 
 
Ronin2
8.1.3  Ronin2  replied to  Dulay @8.1.2    2 weeks ago
I still have my 34 'Sweetness' Jersey

Greatest all around running back to ever play the game. His would be the only non Steelers jersey I would ever consider owning.

 
 
Loading...
Loading...

Who is online

Donald J. Trump fan 1
CB
The Magic Eight Ball
KatPen
JohnRussell
Dulay
loki12


48 visitors