╌>

'Nanny State' Mike Bloomberg doesn’t think you’re smart

  

Category:  Op/Ed

Via:  donald-j-trump-fan-1  •  5 years ago  •  13 comments

By:   Tom Basile

'Nanny State' Mike Bloomberg doesn’t think you’re smart
Bloomberg doesn’t think you’re very smart, can take care of yourself, have a right to privacy, or should get cancer treatment if you’re old. He’s publicly referred to the poor as “those people,” had the gall to suggest that being a farmer is easy and believes working in manufacturing doesn’t take a lot of “grey matter.” Let’s not forget, in 2018 he expressed the view that the poor should be taxed more so they’ll have less money to make bad choices and hurt themselves.

Bloomberg is nothing but a filthy rich elitist snob. He looks down on middle class and working class people not in his favored industry or geographical area.  He is a racist. He is a misogynistic creep.  He wants female employees to kill their babies and for moms with child care needs to hire just anyone.  He’s bitter when his employees need maternity leave.  He’s also a control freak wanting to limit our rights to what he thinks we need.  He will take our guns away and limit us on our homes, Heat, and transportation choices.  He’s an egomaniac who should never be allowed to have any power over our lives.


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



After spending more than $400 million to buy his way into the running for the Democratic Presidential  nomination , former New York City Mayor Mike Bloomberg is predictably picking up some momentum. But Bloomberg’s carefully scripted narrative is unsurprisingly light on details about what his administration would be like for Americans. There’s a reason for that.

Here’s what we do know.  Bloomberg  doesn’t think you’re very smart, can take care of yourself, have a right to privacy, or should get cancer treatment if you’re old. He’s publicly referred to the poor as “those people,” had the gall to suggest that being a farmer is easy and believes working in manufacturing doesn’t take a lot of “grey matter.” Let’s not forget, in 2018 he expressed the view that the poor should be taxed more so they’ll have less money to make bad choices and hurt themselves.

Bloomberg’s nanny state would sound like Fran Drescher to most  Americans , but that won’t stop him from telling you it’s Carrie Underwood, thinking you wouldn’t know the difference.

THREE FARMERS HIT BACK AT MIKE BLOOMBERG: 'ABSOLUTELY OUTRAGED AND DISHEARTENED'

The promise of America has its very foundations in freedom, choice and personal responsibility. Bloomberg has repeatedly demonstrated that his views should eclipse those essential components of American greatness.

The potential for a ‘President Nanny’ isn’t a canard, hyperbole or throwaway line used by opposing campaigns. It gets to the core of a governing philosophy that is divisive and elitist. It is a showcase of his firm belief in his own superiority and lack of faith in the average American.

Time and time again, Bloomberg has opted to regulate choice rather than allow people to make their own decisions. A Bloomberg presidency would take the nanny state national.

Regulating What You Eat

In New York City, Bloomberg opted to ban large sodas, regulate salt intake and force restaurants to post calorie counts instead of educating people about the consequences of poor food choices.

A Bloomberg edict directed hospitals to hide baby formula and actually forced nurses to create a record when mothers requested formula over providing their own breast milk. Yes. He went there.

Banning Plastic Products

One of Bloomberg’s last bans as mayor was Styrofoam because he claimed it couldn’t be recycled and cost the city too much money to allow. After being sued by restaurant owners, who would have to foot the bill for more expensive containers, Bloomberg’s ban was overturned with the court noting that the material could be recycled and provide cost savings to the city.


A federal ban on plastic bags, straws and other plastic products would likely be high on President Bloomberg’s list of executive orders and legislative agenda. All that means is higher costs for consumers.

Like Your SUV? Too Bad.

The way America drives would also likely change under a Bloomberg administration. Like your SUV or pickup? It could go the way of the dodo.

Bloomberg banned all cabs in NYC that were not deemed fuel-efficient or sufficiently accessible, forcing cabbies to purchase his so-called “Taxi of Tomorrow,” the Nissan NV 200. Claims the mandate would prevent future fare hikes proved false and the move precipitated years of lawsuits from taxi drivers who chafed at being told they could only buy one model vehicle by the nanny mayor.

Bloomberg’s radical environmental policy would force consumers into “100 percent emissions-free vehicles” within the next fifteen years.  He’s also a fan of taxing people more based on the distance they drive. So much for America’s car culture.

Even Less Personal Privacy

Bloomberg’s nanny state would also lead to further erosion of personal privacy. As mayor, Bloomberg went on a tear, attempting to create fingerprint databases of hundreds of thousands of mostly low-income New Yorkers. Bloomberg has also supported the expanded use of drones and additional government surveillance measures that can capture photos and video, be used as spyware, track your movements and collect other personal data.

Bloomberg even tried to reduce the number of stores that sold alcohol, though the public backlash forced the mayor to abandon that effort. Like his radical anti-Second Amendment proposals and other nanny policies, this also would have punished the responsible for the sake of regulating a small minority of bad actors.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE OPINION NEWSLETTER

Bloomberg’s nanny list goes on and on including building design, construction materials, bathroom regulations, energy sources, cell phones and more.

Whether in the name of protecting health or the environment or allegedly saving money, nothing would be out of reach should President Bloomberg believe it should be banned or regulated.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

America would become a place where the government establishes a permanent, watchful eye over your behavior, telling you “no” rather than believing you have the intelligence and right to make decisions for yourself.

So much for being the “safe” moderate alternative to Sanders.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM TOM BASILE

Tom Basile is an alumnus of the Bush-Cheney 2000 campaign and served in the Bush administration in various capacities including as senior press advisor to the Coalition Provisional Authority in Iraq from 2003-2004. He is also a SiriusXM Contributor, columnist and author of "Tough Sell: Fighting the Media War in Iraq." Follow him on Twitter at  @Tom_Basile  or at  www.TomBasile.com .


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
1  seeder  XXJefferson51    5 years ago

The promise of America has its very foundations in freedom, choice and personal responsibility. Bloomberg has repeatedly demonstrated that his views should eclipse those essential components of American greatness.

The potential for a ‘President Nanny’ isn’t a canard, hyperbole or throwaway line used by opposing campaigns. It gets to the core of a governing philosophy that is divisive and elitist. It is a showcase of his firm belief in his own superiority and lack of faith in the average American.

Time and time again, Bloomberg has opted to regulate choice rather than allow people to make their own decisions. A Bloomberg presidency would take the nanny state national.

Regulating What You Eat

In New York City, Bloomberg opted to ban large sodas, regulate salt intake and force restaurants to post calorie counts instead of educating people about the consequences of poor food choices.

A Bloomberg edict directed hospitals to hide baby formula and actually forced nurses to create a record when mothers requested formula over providing their own breast milk. Yes. He went there.

Banning Plastic Products

One of Bloomberg’s last bans as mayor was Styrofoam because he claimed it couldn’t be recycled and cost the city too much money to allow. After being sued by restaurant owners, who would have to foot the bill for more expensive containers, Bloomberg’s ban was overturned with the court noting that the material could be recycled and provide cost savings to the city.

A federal ban on plastic bags, straws and other plastic products would likely be high on President Bloomberg’s list of executive orders and legislative agenda. All that means is higher costs for consumers.

Like Your SUV? Too Bad.

The way America drives would also likely change under a Bloomberg administration. Like your SUV or pickup? It could go the way of the dodo.

Bloomberg banned all cabs in NYC that were not deemed fuel-efficient or sufficiently accessible, forcing cabbies to purchase his so-called “Taxi of Tomorrow,” the Nissan NV 200. Claims the mandate would prevent future fare hikes proved false and the move precipitated years of lawsuits from taxi drivers who chafed at being told they could only buy one model vehicle by the nanny mayor.

Bloomberg’s radical environmental policy would force consumers into “100 percent emissions-free vehicles” within the next fifteen years.  He’s also a fan of taxing people more based on the distance they drive. So much for America’s car culture.  

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2  seeder  XXJefferson51    5 years ago

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.1  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2    5 years ago

Bloomberg is nothing but a filthy rich elitist snob. He looks down on us middle class and working class people not in his favored industries or geographical areas.  He is a big time racist. He is a misogynistic creep of the first order.  He wants female employees to kill their babies before birth and for moms with child care needs to quickly hire just anyone and he’s condescending toward caregivers.  He’s bitter when his employees need maternity leave. 16 of them then. He’s also a complete control freak wanting to limit our rights to what he thinks we need.  He will take our guns away and limit us on our homes, Heat, and transportation choices.  He’s an egomaniac who should never be allowed to have any power over our lives.  He should become a farmer and see how honorable and hard that career and work are. 

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.1.1  devangelical  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1    5 years ago
nothing but a filthy rich elitist snob. He looks down on us middle class and working class people not in his favored industries or geographical areas. He is a big time racist. He is a misogynistic creep of the first order. He’s also a complete control freak wanting to limit our rights to what he thinks we need. He’s an egomaniac who should never be allowed to have any power over our lives

who were we talking about again?

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3  seeder  XXJefferson51    5 years ago

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4  Vic Eldred    5 years ago

Tonight we will see Bloomberg on the stage in a debate for the first time. Right now democrat voters seem to be migrating to one of two camps. Either they simply want to defeat Trump and they are lining up behind Bloomberg or they are simply all in for Bernie and are lining up behind Sanders.

 
 
 
katrix
Sophomore Quiet
4.1  katrix  replied to  Vic Eldred @4    5 years ago
Tonight we will see Bloomberg on the stage in a debate for the first time

Speak for yourself. I don't watch primary debates - my state votes so late in the primaries that there's really no point in making myself suffer needlessly.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4.1.1  Vic Eldred  replied to  katrix @4.1    5 years ago

I don't blame you one bit. There are much better things to do on a Wed night.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
4.1.2  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.1.1    5 years ago

Like watching the Trump rally! 

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
4.2  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Vic Eldred @4    5 years ago

They ripped Bloomberg a new one tonight while Trump had a great rally on Fox Newsfor counter programming.  

 
 
 
Steve Ott
Professor Quiet
5  Steve Ott    5 years ago

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
5.1  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Steve Ott @5    5 years ago

 
 
 
Steve Ott
Professor Quiet
5.1.1  Steve Ott  replied to  XXJefferson51 @5.1    5 years ago

I don't disagree, but then, none of the candidates have a coherent tax strategy. And by that, I mean both democrat and republican.

 
 

Who is online






65 visitors