╌>

What does it mean to be a republican today... How does that equate to what Ronald Regan embraced.

  

Category:  News & Politics

By:  flynavy1  •  4 years ago  •  45 comments

What does it mean to be a republican today... How does that equate to what Ronald Regan embraced.
Trying to get a bead on where conservatives think they are 40 years after Regan entered the White House

I watched the RNC last night.  I just started to wonder what Ronald Regan would say, and if he would be listed as a RINO by todays conservatives by his views.


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
FLYNAVY1
Professor Participates
1  author  FLYNAVY1    4 years ago

I think Regan would have been shocked by most all of the speakers last night with the exception on Nikki Hayley and Tim Scott.

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
1.1  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  FLYNAVY1 @1    4 years ago

Why not the Herschel Walker speech?

 
 
 
FLYNAVY1
Professor Participates
1.1.1  author  FLYNAVY1  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @1.1    4 years ago

I found it pretty flat.... 

 
 
 
FLYNAVY1
Professor Participates
1.1.2  author  FLYNAVY1  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @1.1    4 years ago

So what does it mean to you to be a republican today Jim....?

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
1.1.3  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  FLYNAVY1 @1.1.2    4 years ago

I'll get back to you on that. I feel a composition coming on...............jrSmiley_82_smiley_image.gif     jrSmiley_34_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
FLYNAVY1
Professor Participates
1.1.4  author  FLYNAVY1  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @1.1.3    4 years ago

Please do so..... 

Brings some friends, I'd like to hear from them too as I'm sure the word "conservative" comes in slightly different flavors these days.

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
1.1.5  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  FLYNAVY1 @1.1.2    4 years ago
So what does it mean to you to be a republican today Jim....?

It means I believe in the rule of law.

It means I believe in the sovereignty of a nation and its border and control of immigration (the way it was always supposed to be)

It means that all of mankind was created equal. NOT some more equal than others 

It means I believe in personal responsibility in all aspects of their lives and decisions therein

It means I believe in a hand up not a hand out

It means we all, as American citizens, all have the same rights as such. 

It means I don't go around looking for something to be offended by nor do I seek special treatment

It means I have respect for the office of POTUS and, whether good or bad, the person that occupies the people's house. But not necessarily the policies of said occupant nor his/her personality

I believe in the American Dream and everything associated with it including said personal responsibility to one's self to pull themselves up with a little kick in the pants (see hand up not hand out)

I am sure I can come up with more but that sums up the major points.

I have pretty humble beginnings. I have worked since I was 15 years old. I got no help, outside my parents mental support, to achieve what I have in my life and take responsibility for the good and especially the bad decisions I have made. I always kept my eyes and ears open for the good and the bad  and made my life choices throughout with critical thinking and goals.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
1.1.8  Ozzwald  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @1.1.5    4 years ago
It means I believe in the rule of law.

Yet refuse legal subpoenas and violate the Hatch Act on live TV?

It means I believe in the sovereignty of a nation and its border and control of immigration (the way it was always supposed to be)

Like trying to trade Puerto Rico for Greenland?

It means that all of mankind was created equal. NOT some more equal than others

Even people from "shit hole" countries?

It means I believe in personal responsibility in all aspects of their lives and decisions therein

Trump:  "I don’t take responsibility at all."

It means I believe in a hand up not a hand out

Trump Tax Cuts Helped Billionaires Pay Less Taxes Than The Working Class In 2018

It means we all, as American citizens, all have the same rights as such.

Protesters Dispersed With Tear Gas So Trump Could Pose at Church

It means I don't go around looking for something to be offended by nor do I seek special treatment

Trump commits to helping blue states fight the coronavirus — if their governors are nice to him

It means I have respect for the office of POTUS and, whether good or bad, the person that occupies the people's house. But not necessarily the policies of said occupant nor his/her personality

Trump's unhinged 'treason' accusation against Obama

.

Every single one of your statements are hypocritical if you support Trump.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
1.2  Trout Giggles  replied to  FLYNAVY1 @1    4 years ago

At least the GOP managed to get 2 credible people to speak

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2  JohnRussell    4 years ago

This all traces back to the birth of right wing media with Rush Limbaugh at the start of the first Bill Clinton term. Limbaugh opened every show with "America Held Hostage,  day ____  of the Clinton administration."  and right wing nuttery was off to the races. 

I doubt if the hard right will ever come back to reality. They will have to be outlived. 

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
3  Kavika     4 years ago

I didn't watch the RNC but from what I've seen in the past few years the GOP isn't anything at all like it was back in the day. 

Actually I have no idea what they stand for today. 

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Principal
3.1  Gsquared  replied to  Kavika @3    4 years ago

What do they stand for today?

That's easy.  Trump, Trump, Trump and more Trump.  

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
3.2  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Kavika @3    4 years ago
Actually I have no idea what they stand for today. 

They seem to stand up and defend the confederate flag. They defend confederate monuments. They defend the Nazi's and white supremacists marching in the streets chanting "Jews will not replace us!". They defend the cops who have shot and killed so many unarmed black men. They defend the right wing extremists who have murdered abortion doctors or bombed clinics. They defend anti-science rhetoric on climate, evolution and the pandemic. They defend Russian election interference because it favored their candidate. They defend the many members of Trumps campaign who have either plead guilty numerous times or been convicted of numerous felonies. They defend a President who an investigation found likely obstructed justice at least 10 times. They defend a President who has been accused of sexual assault by more than two dozen women and admitted in his own words that he doesn't "even wait" for consent and just starts kissing women he finds attractive and "grabs them by the pussy" because he thinks he's "a star". They defend a President who was caught red handed extorting a foreign government for dirt on a political opponent. They defend a President who requested his ambassador to ask the British, which he did, to steer the British Open to one of the Presidents privately owned golf courses.

The list goes on and on, but I have yet to find something they defend that most Americans actually want.

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Principal
3.2.1  Gsquared  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @3.2    4 years ago

So very true.

 
 
 
pat wilson
Professor Participates
3.2.2  pat wilson  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @3.2    4 years ago

Don't forget Qanon !

 
 
 
FLYNAVY1
Professor Participates
3.3  author  FLYNAVY1  replied to  Kavika @3    4 years ago

If they had worked on a party platform, we might have a way of knowing in writing.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
3.3.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  FLYNAVY1 @3.3    4 years ago

Isn't that what the convention is for...to firm up the party platform?

 
 
 
FLYNAVY1
Professor Participates
4  author  FLYNAVY1    4 years ago

I will actually invite C4P to post on this seed.  I really want to understand how Trump voters see themselves with respect to Regan.

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
4.1  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  FLYNAVY1 @4    4 years ago
I really want to understand how Trump voters see themselves with respect to Reagan.

Here's the difference. When Reagan said:

"In spite of the wildly speculative and false stories of arms for hostages and alleged ransom payments, we did not—repeat, did not—trade weapons or anything else for hostages, nor will we." - President Ronald Reagan November 1986

The Republicans believed him and supported him. Then, a few months later he said:

"A few months ago, I told the American people I did not trade arms for hostages. My heart and my best intentions still tell me that's true, but the facts and evidence tell me it is not." March 1987

The Republicans were disappointed, not so much that he lied to the American people, but that he got caught. What they were really hoping for they get in Trump, a President who will never admit to any of the criminal activity and lies he's spouted. His response in March 1987 would likely have been:

"A few months ago, I told the American people I did not trade arms for hostages. And I was right. I never did such a thing, but a little guy, little Ollie, he lied to me and our government and did some bad things, some very bad things. And it's probably the Democrats who made him do it, so we will come down very hard on that Ollie North who some say is a Democrat, maybe, I don't know, but that's what I heard...".

That's what these Trump Republicans want. They want to be lied to, they want to be told they're super special even if they didn't make it all the way through high school because of their "American heritage" and Trump gives them exactly what they want.

The old centrist, fiscally conservative, morally liberal Republican no longer exists or is supporting Joe Biden this year.

 
 
 
FLYNAVY1
Professor Participates
4.1.1  author  FLYNAVY1  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @4.1    4 years ago

Lots of food for thought there DP.....

The old centrist, fiscally conservative, morally liberal Republican no longer exists or is supporting Joe Biden this year.

There is quite a bit of evidence to support that statement.  Thanks for making it.

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
4.1.2  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  FLYNAVY1 @4.1.1    4 years ago
The old centrist, fiscally conservative, morally liberal Republican

Nowadays Trump supporters call them "RINO's" or "NeverTrumper's". Today, if you're at or left of Mitt Romney you're considered a RINO.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
4.1.3  Trout Giggles  replied to  FLYNAVY1 @4.1.1    4 years ago

I miss the GOP of yesterday. They tried to keep spending low and they pretty much minded their own business. Abortion wasn't such a big deal til the Moral Majority got involved.

 
 
 
FLYNAVY1
Professor Participates
4.1.4  author  FLYNAVY1  replied to  Trout Giggles @4.1.3    4 years ago

You're talking the 1970s TG...... I though you told me you were 29!

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
4.1.5  Trout Giggles  replied to  FLYNAVY1 @4.1.4    4 years ago

What I didn't tell you is I have dyslexia!

 
 
 
FLYNAVY1
Professor Participates
4.1.6  author  FLYNAVY1  replied to  Trout Giggles @4.1.5    4 years ago

I'm in good company then...... I've learned coping skills for the same.  What made 2D reading comprehension so difficult for me was offset by being able to "see" easily in three dimension. 

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
4.1.7  Trout Giggles  replied to  FLYNAVY1 @4.1.6    4 years ago

I can read fine. I have trouble with numbers. I constantly mix them up, turn them around, upside down, and inside out. I had very many problems with simple math in grade school. Then I get to high school and algebra and now I'm working with letters. Got way better grades

 
 
 
FLYNAVY1
Professor Participates
4.1.8  author  FLYNAVY1  replied to  Trout Giggles @4.1.7    4 years ago

Exact opposite..... Numbers made sense early on, thus math came easy.  Reading and writing was a problem.  Tried to learn to read music,  not a chance, but I use to play very well by ear.

Years ago in researching dyslexia when I noted issues with one of my daughters, they had identified over 130 different forms of the condition. That was twenty years ago.... Might be different now.  Even when posting on these seeds, I still to this day will leave words out, transpose entire words....   

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
4.1.9  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @4.1    4 years ago

I must say I admire Reagen because he was intelligent enough and had the integrity to admit that he was wrong about something.  It will be a frosty day in Hell when not only Trump, but his dedicated followers would ever do likewise. 

 
 
 
FLYNAVY1
Professor Participates
4.1.10  author  FLYNAVY1  replied to  Buzz of the Orient @4.1.9    4 years ago

Different times.... Imagine Regan or any of our previous presidents under the microscope of the 24-7 news cycle.  We have news outlets that make a profit per uttered or written syllable.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
4.1.11  Tessylo  replied to  Trout Giggles @4.1.3    4 years ago
"Abortion wasn't such a big deal til the Moral Majority got involved."

Of which they were neither, moral or a majority.  

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
4.1.12  Tessylo  replied to  FLYNAVY1 @4.1.8    4 years ago

Reading and writing were my favorites.  Any math beyond the basics is a bear for me.  I struggled with pre-algebra.  

 
 
 
Raven Wing
Professor Participates
4.1.13  Raven Wing   replied to  Tessylo @4.1.12    4 years ago
I struggled with pre-algebra. 

I flunked pre-algebra. I had always struggled with math.  It was always embarrassing when I had to go to the board and solve a math question, or at least tried to, and usually failed. Knowing how this made me fell, my parents hired me a tutor. She not only tutored me on algebra, but, helped me with other areas of general math that had always been hard for me. After that, I not only aced the pre-algebra class, but, I aced all the way through algebra 4. And I was not afraid of math anymore. 

 
 
 
MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka)
Junior Participates
4.1.14  MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka)  replied to  Raven Wing @4.1.13    4 years ago

I have to have a real life scenario for math to make sense to me. I took a class in HS called "Applied Mathematics" and I Aced it. What our class didn't know is that we were performing algebra, calculus, trigonometry, physics, geometry, etc. and those advanced math and science classes made fun of our class. The teachers were awesome though and gave us all the same final exam, which was our Applied Math final... our class did WAY better than the others and then it was shared with the classes where that exam came from; they knew the formulas and how to solve an equation, but they had no idea how it's used in the real world. The other classes were able to take the final that they were supposed to get, but those teachers wanted to prove a point; just because you think that a class is "simple" or "simplified" doesn't necessarily make it so. We just learned it in a different way. 

I always Aced reading and writing. My favorite classes were always hands-on classes though; wood shop, auto shop, ceramics, art, etc. and I loved psychology.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
5  Sean Treacy    4 years ago

It's true, Trump has certainly moderated the classic Reagan/Goldwater fusionsm of limiting the federalists government/hawkish foreign policy/ free trade and social conservatism.  Ted Cruz probably best exemplifies a modern Reagan/Goldwater Conservative and he's lost the small government fight within the party. Now the Republicans just stand for a smaller big government as opposed to the democrats.  The difference is probably best exemplified by the negotiations for the latest round of "Stimulus" where democrats want to borrow 3 trillion dollars and Republicans only one trillion. 

 Trump's brand of populism has adopted the democrats willingness to spend massive amounts of money and trade protectionism while  adopting the Obama doctrine of unlimited executive power.  It's certainly a departure from the ideals of Reagan.  But Trump has done a better job(Thanks to Harry Reid ending the judicial filibuster that made it all possible ) of appointing more Reaganite judges then Reagan did. Plus, at the operational level in the departments where most policy is made, Trump has appointed conservatives who favor traditional conservative policy outcomes.  The President and Congress have very little effect anymore on the rules and laws that actually govern us. Those decisions are made at the agency level, and Trump's appointments have been solid. Trump's meaninglesss tweets draw all the attention but the real governing takes place in the courts and in the agencies.

Nor does Trump exist in a vacuum. The alternative couldn't be more repugnant to a Goldwater/Reagan conservative. While Trump's tax cuts and deregulation are straight from the Reagan/ Goldwater playbook the Democratic Party has moved so far left that the Bill Clinton of 1996 would be a conservative today.  

trump has moved away from some aspects of the Goldwater/Reagan fusionism that created the modern Republican Party. But Trumpism must be  compared with a party that looks to Stalin and and socialism for answers,  and for anyone who is not a race obsessed socialist, supporting Trump over Biden is an easy call.  Just look at Portland for what Democrats offer.  

 

 
 
 
FLYNAVY1
Professor Participates
5.1  author  FLYNAVY1  replied to  Sean Treacy @5    4 years ago

Thanks very much Sean.....  I'm going to chew on this for a bit and see how to ask some to properly worded questions that will be taken as true inquiry as intended 

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
5.2  Greg Jones  replied to  Sean Treacy @5    4 years ago
 and for anyone who is not a race obsessed socialist, supporting Trump over Biden is an easy call.  Just look at Portland for what Democrats offer.  

My thoughts exactly.

 
 
 
FLYNAVY1
Professor Participates
5.2.1  author  FLYNAVY1  replied to  Greg Jones @5.2    4 years ago

Greg, since you are here...... I'm going to ask if you wouldn't mind positing your thoughts on the question.  Obviously you favored Reagan in the past. I'd like your observations on where conservatives are today vs. forty years ago given the differences between Trump and Reagan 

 
 
 
PJ
Masters Quiet
6  PJ    4 years ago

I watched last night and it scared the hell out of me.  I say that with all seriousness.  I heard nothing that moved me to think this President or Administration had any new ideas. 

What is the plan to get the virus under control and people back to work and/or what can be done in the transition?  I heard no hope, no solutions, no unity, no empathy for lives lost.   Mostly, I felt sad watching and sad for those speaking.  The fear tactics and level of anger coming from every speaker with the exception of the Cuban immigrant businessman was palpable. 

Damn it makes me mad.  Where is the republican party?!!!! 

I'll watch again this evening and tomorrow evening and the next because its my responsibility as an American to remain engaged and informed. 

 
 
 
pat wilson
Professor Participates
6.1  pat wilson  replied to  PJ @6    4 years ago

I appreciate your sacrifice, not sure I could stomach it.

 
 
 
PJ
Masters Quiet
6.1.1  PJ  replied to  pat wilson @6.1    4 years ago

It was hard.  There were times I had my finger on the remote button but I convinced myself that I could make it until the end.  It actually ended 10 minutes early........I was watching the clock. 

 
 
 
FLYNAVY1
Professor Participates
6.2  author  FLYNAVY1  replied to  PJ @6    4 years ago

Yep PJ.... I'm watching with a drink in one hand and Maalox in the other

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
6.2.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  FLYNAVY1 @6.2    4 years ago

Add some Aleve to that cocktail, too

 
 
 
Account Deleted
Freshman Silent
7  Account Deleted    4 years ago

Ronald Reagan

1. Reagan wanted to privatize the Post Office – a little at a time perhaps - by subcontracting.

2. Reagan wanted to make Social Security optional. As an alternative he wanted the government to invest Social Security funds in the stock market.

3. Reagan made significant tax cuts showing the Republican preference for Supply Side Economics.

4. Deprived of the revenue from taxes, he borrowed money – both domestic and foreign investment - for defense spending to put pressure on the Soviet Union. This added 1.86 TRILLION dollars to the public debt. (GDP did well during this time. The formula GDP=C+I+G+NetExports – note the G stands for government spending which he did a lot of. )

5. Reduced regulation of savings and loan institutions leading, at least in part,  to the Savings and Loan Crisis in the late 80’s.

6. Opposed to publicly funded health care.

7. Opposed to abortion being legal.

8. He initially opposed the Civil Rights Act of 1964 [59] , the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and the Equal Rights Amendment

9. Stated that Jefferson Davis was one of his heroes.

10. He supported prayer in public schools.

11. Reagan dismissed acid rain and proposals to halt it as burdensome to industry...He questioned scientific evidence on the causes of acid rain. [49]

12. He wanted to abolish the Department of Education.

Reagan was a nicer man than Donald Trump. It was hard not to like him.

But he was a Republican.

 
 

Who is online





bccrane
CB
evilone


239 visitors