'Firmageddon': Researchers find 1.1 million acres of dead trees in Oregon
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
Drought-stricken Oregon saw a historic die-off of fir trees in 2022 that left hillsides once lush with green conifers dotted with patches of red, dead trees.
The damage to fir trees was so significant researchers took to calling the blighted areas "firmageddon" as they flew overhead during aerial surveys that estimated the die-off's extent.
The surveyors ultimately tallied about 1.1 million acres of Oregon forest with dead firs, the most damage recorded in a single season since surveys began 75 years ago.
Oregon's dead firs are a visceral example of how drought is reshaping landscapes in Western states that have been experiencing extreme heat conditions. In many areas, these firs might be replaced by more drought-hardy species in the future, reshaping how ecosystems function and changing their character.
"When I looked at it and crunched the numbers, it was almost twice as bad as far as acres impacted than anything we had previously documented," said Danny DePinte, an aerial survey program manager for the U.S. Forest Service. "Nature is selecting which trees get to be where during the drought."
Fir die-off as observed during this year's aerial survey in the Fremont-Winema National Forest in southern Oregon.Daniel DePinte / USFS
Oregon is known for towering volcanic domes covered by a blanket of conifers that becomes sparse and patchwork on the eastern side of the Cascade Mountains before it tucks into the high desert.
The people who know the trees best say there are many signs of problems in Oregon.
"We're seeing forms of stress in all of our species of trees," said Christine Buhl, a forest entomologist with the Oregon Department of Forestry. "We just need to shift our expectations of what tree species we can expect to be planted where."
Researchers have been surveying Pacific Northwest forests by air since 1947. Little about the process has changed during that time, according to Glenn Kohler, an entomologist with the Washington State Department of Natural Resources, which operates the program alongside the U.S. Forest Service and Oregon Department of Forestry.
Each summer, small high-wing planes soar about 1,000 feet above the tree canopy at about 100 mph. Trained observers peer outside both sides of the plane, looking for noticeable damage to trees.
Dead trees — conifers that are completely red or orange — are the easiest to spot, but the observers can also pinpoint trees that are barren of needles in some areas.
The observers rate the intensity of damage and map its location. Pilots fly in a grid pattern with flight lines about 4 miles apart to cover every swath of the forest.
"It's literally like mowing the lawn," Kohler said of the flight trajectory.
Paper maps of the past have been replaced today by Samsung Galaxy tablets that track the plane's progress and make mapping easier — and probably more accurate.
Observers require a season of training, Kohler said. It can be a dizzying task.
Brent Oblinger, a plant pathologist on the Deschutes National Forest, while in the process of conducting a portion of the survey.USFS
"We're analyzing 16-30 acres per second," DePinte said, noting that small planes can offer a more turbulent ride. "You definitely have to have a stomach of steel."
This year, the aerial observation program flew over about 69 million acres of Washington and Oregon forest in about 246 hours.
"We're just really painting the picture. It's not hard science. You're not counting individual trees or inspecting individual trees. The purpose is — what are the major trends and to detect outbreaks," Kohler said.
The scale of damage in Oregon, which was first reported by the environmental journalism nonprofit Columbia Insight, was staggering to the researchers and begs for a more thorough study.
"We had never seen anything to this level," DePinte said. "It sets you back and makes you pause. Your scientific mind starts questioning why. We don't always have the answers."
Trees are susceptible to bark beetles, root diseases and defoliators like caterpillars. Aerial surveys help researchers capture the booms and busts of these pathogens.
Healthy trees typically can defend themselves against these threats. When beetles drill into a trees' bark, for example, a healthy tree can push the beetles out by excreting pitch, a gooey substance, where they entered the tree, Kohler said.
Each summer, small high-wing planes soar about 1,000 feet above the tree canopy at about 100 mph, trained observers peer outside both windows of the plane, looking for noticeable damage to trees. USFS
But disturbances like drought, wildfire and windstorms can stress trees and weaken their defenses. Large numbers of dead and dying trees could allow bark beetles to lay eggs, feed their larvae and flourish.
Scientists still only have a coarse understanding of the factors that are causing widespread die-offs in Oregon, but many view drought as the underlying culprit.
"There are multiple factors at play here. One of the things most of us agree on: The primary factor we have going on here is hot drought," Buhl said, meaning that the state has been hampered by higher-than-normal temperatures and also low precipitation.
DePinte said damage was most pronounced in White, Shasta and Red firs on the eastern side of the Cascade Mountain range's crest, where the climate is drier.
Nearly half of Oregon is experiencing severe, extreme or exceptional drought, according to the U.S. Drought Monitor. The drought is worse in eastern Oregon.
Oregon's average temperatures have risen about 2.2 degrees Fahrenheit since 1895, according to a 2021 state climate assessment delivered to the state's Legislature. The severity of drought has increased over the past two decades in part because of human-caused climate change, the report says. Summers in Oregon are expected to become warmer and drier.
"We've been hearing about climate change for some time. Climate change is happening. We're now feeling it," Buhl said. "These summers are getting warm and long. We're seeing evidence on the landscape. We needed to pay more attention decades ago, but we didn't."
Buhl said impacts to forest health are taking out roughly as many trees as wildfires, which are also now more likely and more intense by climate change.
Heat waves are a growing threat, too. On Oregon's west side, trees were scorched by the June 2021 heat dome, which sent Portland's temperature as high as 116. Scientists have said the intense heat wave was "virtually impossible" without climate change.
Fir die-off as observed during this year's aerial survey in the Fremont-Winema National Forest in southern Oregon.USFS
Aerial assessments last year documented nearly 230,000 acres of heat scorch across Oregon and Washington, DePinte said. Most of the damage was on hillsides with south-facing aspects that soak up more sunlight because of the sun's angle in the sky.
"It was the combination of the high temperatures in the afternoon with the sun boring down," said Chris Still, a professor in the College of Forestry at Oregon State University. "We think a lot of those leaves just cooked in place."
Still speculated that the heat dome could have contributed to this year's fir die-off, also, but more research and evidence is needed to examine any possible connection.
DePinte said the 2021 scorching was the largest ever recorded, which means the Pacific Northwest has now seen two events of record-breaking damage in its forests in as many years.
Tags
Who is online
440 visitors
Due to global warming, maybe they should start planting cyprus and palm trees there.
They are not sure what causes it, but if it's the drought, good news is on the way. Rain is in the forecast for Oregon and winter is about to make it's mark.
If it is the drought, it is a battle for water and not all the trees are getting what they need. Pretty dense population by the looks of it and only the strong (water pigs) are surviving.
Or it could be wood boring beetles, or a disease of some kind. It’s just easier for the intellectually lazy to blame global warming.
Another one that doesn't know the difference between, "weather", and, "climate".
"Climate" is the word that the left had to come up with to replace "global warming" after a few cold years.
But Buzz according to liars and fools and morons, there is no such thing as global warming
The science isn't settled.
Not according to those types of folks like I referred to
To me the science is settled, global warming, climate change, whatever it wants to be called is happening, has happened multiple times, it isn't caused by human activity and nothing we as humans can do will stop it. The only way is to let the natural water cycle do what it does, seas will rise, ice sheets and glaciers will melt until the next Ice Age starts the reversal and when it has dropped the seas sufficiently to slow the atmospheric conveyor belt building the ice sheets and glaciers then the global cooling which will flow directly into the global warming again, over and over again.
NONSENSE, Of course humans contribute to it greatly
That is YOUR excuse for doing nothing and not caring
The sea levels have been rising since the last Ice Age and they will continue to rise another 23 meters even if we weren't even here and the more liquid water the warmer the climate, it will mean that Greenland will lose most of it's ice sheets just as the next Ice Age begins and it won't regain it's ice sheets until the sea levels drop enough to cool the climate and the ice will no longer melt significantly and the ice sheets will redevelop on Greenland.
That is YOUR excuse for doing nothing and not caring
Right now our "doing something" isn't going to change a thing about warming, it WILL happen anyways. Rising seas will eventually move people to higher ground.
I go to those who know what they're talking about on these matters [deleted]
Is it better for them to be red than dead, or dead than red? Actually, I guess there's really no question because they're both red and dead.
There are hundreds of reasons this could be happening. Insect invasion, soil contamination the list goes on.
A controlled burn in areas could help find a resolution.
Has anyone stopped to think and question, do wind farms have anything to do with the droughts. Pulling energy out of the atmosphere may keep moisture from being lifted high enough to clear the mountain ranges like in Oregon, but also California based wind farms maybe the reason why Lake Mead is drying up.
This was discussed at length in the 1980s which resulted in the redesigned blades we currently see
with the additional benefit of being more efficient producing energy.
New bladeless wind "fans" are coming that convert wind energy into motion which results in electricity.
Think tube boys that generate electricity
Bladeless Wind Turbines: Are They Worth The Hype? (semprius.com)
Still conservation of energy, you can't produce energy from nothing it still needs to be transferred/transformed from the atmosphere.
Are the dead trees useable as lumber, pulp or firewood?
Depends on the expense of accessing enough trees to make a profit.
Since this was an aerial surveillance of mountain forests, probably unlikely.
Over the last couple of decades I've noticed a increase in the number of dead fir trees in the higher altitude areas in the Great Smokey Mountains. I thought it was because of "acid rain" because the trees looked like they were bleached. This article blames Global Warming.
Sulphur dioxide is a pollutant that causes acid rain.
This pie chart shows the source of sulphur dioxide in the U.S.
This shows the sources of sulphur dioxide in Canada:
Another pollutant that causes acid rain is Nitrates (NOx).
Here are the sources of Nitrate in the U.S.:
Here is the pie chart for Canada:
Another reason that overpopulation needs to be addressed