╌>

The check the box debate

  

Category:  Op/Ed

By:  vic-eldred  •  3 months ago  •  103 comments

The check the box debate
“I think it’s incredibly weak, weak sauce, to show up with your running mate,” CNN contributor Scott Jennings, a former special assistant to President George W. Bush, said on the air. He added that Harris had a “troubling lack of confidence in her political ability.”

Link to quote: Editorial: Kamala Harris's plus-one for CNN interview a negative for image (bostonherald.com)


Tonight at 9:PM CNN will televise a taped interview with Kamala Harris and her VP Tim Walz. Normally it is not a big deal to do an interview, but the Harris campaign has made it that way by not allowing either Harris or Walz to answer questions. The reason is quite simple. Harris has been snake bitten by interviews. Most damning for her have been follow up questions that have become deadly for somebody so dull witted.


CNN is a very friendly venue and the fact that the interview the public sees was actually taped earlier means that it will be edited to help save Harris and Walz. The questions should be obvious, after flip flopping on major policies on the eve of an election need to be explained. The recent call for price controls needs to be explained. The recent idea of a huge tax increase requires details.  Can she defend what she has done with all those tie breaking votes (more than 30 times) which helped to enact Biden's radical agenda.  Why can't she do an interview by herself? Does she regret helping to raise money for violent protestors? The follow up questions would tell us if Kamala Harris knows what she is talking about. The fact that Tim Walz is with her means that the likelihood of follow up questions are almost nil.

So, what is the purpose of this farce?

It is to end the criticism of her not doing interviews. After this she can point to this one.


In other news:

Israel’s military said it killed five militants in a gun battle in a Mosque in the occupied West Bank, as a large military operation there continued.

Two journalists in Hong Kong were convicted of sedition. Another blow to freedom of the press there.

Kamala Harris and Tim Walz are on a bus tour in Georgia. Harris and Walz will appear on CNN at 9 p.m. Eastern for the first major television interview of their presidential campaign.


The Trump campaign is making a push in the Midwest. JD Vance visited Pennsylvania and Wisconsin yesterday, and Donald Trump will be in La Crosse, Wis., tonight for a town hall event.

The Supreme Court maintained a pause on part of Biden's attempt to forgive student debt, which he introduced after the court had rejected his more sweeping plan last year.

A damning IG report has been released on Biden's Gaza pier. It seems that the Defense Department always knew it was an impossible task, yet Biden demanded that it be constructed. The pier was only operational for 20 days due to rough seas. It cost $230 million dollars.

A judge granted Sarah Palin a new trial in her lawsuit against the partisan New York Times, saying the original trial had wrongly excluded evidence.

Certain states are keeping RFK Jr on the ballot. Will they do the same with Joe Biden?

Jack Smith is trying to keep a Trump indictment in the news. So much for the DOJ policy of not indicting candidates in the midst of an election.


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1  author  Vic Eldred    3 months ago

Good morning.

Has anyone noticed how many Trump positions Kamala Harris has tried to hijack?

Front-Cover-08-28-2024.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&w=440

She is now to the right of Trump!

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.1  devangelical  replied to  Vic Eldred @1    3 months ago
Why can't she do an interview

damned if she does, damned if she doesn't. it's sad when losers finally resign themselves to the inevitable. not this time, maga...

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.1.1  Texan1211  replied to  devangelical @1.1    3 months ago

She is very good at tossing salads.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.1.2  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  devangelical @1.1    3 months ago

How much of the original interview will we see tonight?

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.1.3  devangelical  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.1.2    3 months ago

probably enough for trump to float another trial balloon excuse about dodging their debate, but not enough to send the maga lemmings stampeding towards the nearest cliff... /s

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.1.4  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  devangelical @1.1.3    3 months ago

Oh, the debate!

It seems the Harris campaign wants the mic open.

Evidently, they want Kamala to parrot something to get Trump mad?

They are like children.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.1.5  devangelical  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.1.4    3 months ago
It seems the Harris campaign wants the mic open.

relax, trump and his campaign still have 11 days to get on the same page about the mic ...

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.1.6  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  devangelical @1.1.5    3 months ago

These are the rules that Biden demanded. Trump agreed. Harris originally wanted everything Trump agreed to.

That also means no notes for Harris the dummy.

And why does she need to sit down?

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
1.1.7  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  devangelical @1.1.5    3 months ago

They are the page about the mic. Muted when not speaking.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.1.8  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.1.6    3 months ago

With all due respect, who gives a shit? 

When Harris asks Trump what he was doing on the afternoon of Jan 6th he's going to pee his pants whether his mic is on or off. 

Trump has demonstrated tremendous consciousness of guilt about this issue. It is childs play for a prosecutor to dig at it. 

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.1.9  Texan1211  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.1.6    3 months ago
And why does she need to sit down?

Maybe all the changes in her positions made her a bit dizzy.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.1.10  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @1.1.8    3 months ago
With all due respect, who gives a shit? 

Biden and Harris gave a shit. They wanted and got it all their way!


When Harris asks Trump what he was doing on the afternoon of Jan 6th he's going to pee his pants whether his mic is on or off.

Is that supposed to be the gotcha question?

If Donald is reading this, here is your answer; I TOLD THEM THEY NEEDED THE NATIONAL GUARD.

Is that all she has?

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.1.11  Texan1211  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.1.10    3 months ago
Is that all she has?

Maybe she'll tell Trump that she was wrong and he was right about the border wall.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.1.12  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Texan1211 @1.1.9    3 months ago
 bit dizzy.

She is 59 and Trump is 78 and She is the one who can't stand for 90 minutes.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.1.13  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Texan1211 @1.1.11    3 months ago

Maybe she'll say he is better for the job of President.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.1.14  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.1.10    3 months ago
If Donald is reading this, here is your answer; I TOLD THEM THEY NEEDED THE NATIONAL GUARD.

I have been on forums like this since 2001. 

That is one of the most pathetic replies I have ever seen. 

Your advice for Trump is analogous to a fire chief saying "I told them they needed to update their electrical system"  as an excuse for not sending his fire department to put out the fire at a burning building. 

Such a fire chief would not have his job the next day. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.1.15  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @1.1.14    3 months ago

Believe it or not, the Capitol Police did a very good job.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
1.1.16  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.1.4    3 months ago

It's not hard to get under the 'man' child's skin.  He's like a petulant toddler like the maga.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.2  Texan1211  replied to  Vic Eldred @1    3 months ago

My favorite flip flop of all time is how she is now for a wall at the border.

How can so many otherwise thinking adults get so bamboozled by this sorry excuse for a candidate?

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.2.1  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Texan1211 @1.2    3 months ago

I love the way they jumped on the Trump bandwagon of no tax on tips, as soon as the Harris campaign hit Nevada.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
1.2.2  Sean Treacy  replied to  Texan1211 @1.2    3 months ago
ow can so many otherwise thinking adults get so bamboozled by this sorry excuse for a candidate?

It's depressing when you think about just how ignorant so many voters are. 

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.2.3  Texan1211  replied to  Sean Treacy @1.2.2    3 months ago

Extremely.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.2.4  JohnRussell  replied to  Sean Treacy @1.2.2    3 months ago
It's depressing when you think about just how ignorant so many voters are.

[deleted]

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.2.5  Texan1211  replied to  Sean Treacy @1.2.2    3 months ago
It's depressing when you think about just how ignorant so many voters are.

Just listen to their reasons for voting for Harris and for far too many, the main one is "not Trump".

Sad they can't think of real reasons to vote for her.

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Masters Guide
1.2.6  Right Down the Center  replied to  Texan1211 @1.2.5    3 months ago
Sad they can't think of real reasons to vote for her.

Since she doesn't talk to the press we don't have to be inundated with word salads.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.2.7  JohnRussell  replied to  Texan1211 @1.2.5    3 months ago

What is your reason for attacking Harris all the time and never attacking Trump, since you say you dislike them both? There isnt a single person here that is not on to your bs. 

Why do you think its ok to vote for Trump?  Is it patriotic to vote for someone who says our soldiers are losers and suckers ?  Or does such talk DISQUALIFY him ? 

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.2.8  Texan1211  replied to  JohnRussell @1.2.7    3 months ago
What is your reason for attacking Harris all the time and never attacking Trump, since you say you dislike them both? There isnt a single person here that is not on to your bs. 

This is very simple.

 I dislike both Harris and Trump.

There are always, always, ALWAYS hit pieces on Trump published here every single day, so we have way enough people bitching about all things Trump 24/7.

I don't give a flying fuck what others 'think' they know, I know they are all wrong, and are making themselves look foolish.

Why do you think its ok to vote for Trump?  

It sure gets tiring reading what others 'think' they read. I won't waste time or energy debating or defending positions you invented for me. You don't need my participation for that kind of crap.

The one thing no one who uses such a lame-ass tactic can do is EVER quote me saying what they claim, and believe me when I tell you I have tried to get them to do so every time anyone tries this shit on me. Usually they just cut and run, what will you do?

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.2.9  Texan1211  replied to  Sean Treacy @1.2.2    3 months ago
It's depressing when you think about just how ignorant so many voters are. 

Maybe they all just fell out of a coconut tree?

(cackle, cackle!)

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.2.10  JohnRussell  replied to  Texan1211 @1.2.8    3 months ago

Everyone here knows what you do. Everyone. Of course half of them agree with your tactic since it is one of attacking the Democrat. 

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.2.11  Texan1211  replied to  JohnRussell @1.2.10    3 months ago

Hey, if you don't like me calling out such lame tactics as claiming something I have never said, stop doing it.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
1.3  Greg Jones  replied to  Vic Eldred @1    3 months ago

If Kamala can't handle softball questions from a friendly questioner without a man running interference for her, how is she fit and prepared to lead the country?

MC-KamaTrike_082924-800x0.jpg

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.3.1  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Greg Jones @1.3    3 months ago

That is a good question for feminists.

My conclusion is that she is weak & dull witted. She is unfit for the office.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
1.3.2  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.3.1    3 months ago

Weak and dull witted.  Yup.  The PROJECTION.  The former 'president' convicted felon and rapist is indeed weak and dull witted and unfit for office.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.3.3  Texan1211  replied to  Tessylo @1.3.2    3 months ago
Weak and dull witted.  Yup.

EXACTLY!

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.3.4  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Tessylo @1.3.2    3 months ago

Do you think China fears Kamala?

Who do you think Iran wants to win?

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
1.3.5  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.3.4    3 months ago

Maga 'men' fear Kamala.  Bunch of chickenshit bully cowards with the former 'president' convicted felon being the biggest of all!

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.3.6  Texan1211  replied to  Tessylo @1.3.5    3 months ago

sensible people would do well to worry about power being in Kamala's incapable hands.

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
1.4  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  Vic Eldred @1    3 months ago
"Israel’s military said it killed five militants in a gun battle in a Mosque in the occupied West Bank, as a large military operation there continued."

Was that the mosque that was reported in which Hamas was operating an explosives factory?   Oh, the UN won't have anything to say about that, will they.  Just as the media really didn't want to reveal that the IDF killed 31 Hamas militants among the exaggerated numbers report of 100 dead at a UN school.  Again, the UN won't admit anything about that cause according to the UN and the media and the protesters the Hamas terrorist militants are heroes and the IDF are cruel unfeeling bastards. 

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
2  Texan1211    3 months ago

Only the most devout sickophants will swallow the lie that Harris has 'evolved' on so many issues, but it doesn't matter, folks will cast a vote against Trump and vainly think they are 'saving democracy' or some other silly bullshit.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.1  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Texan1211 @2    3 months ago
olks will cast a vote against Trump

We heard it right here. For some that is all the election is about.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
2.1.1  Texan1211  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.1    3 months ago

Far too many are one issue voters, even those who can not defend such a vote logically.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.1.2  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Texan1211 @2.1.1    3 months ago
Far too many are one issue voters,

Her only policy which hasn't changed is abortion.

How many women are wasting a vote on that single issue?

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.1.3  JohnRussell  replied to  Texan1211 @2.1.1    3 months ago
For some that is all the election is about.

It is IDIOTIC to think that keeping the worst presidential candidate in US history out of office is not a good reason to vote for his opponent. 

Idiotic and childlike actually. 

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
2.1.4  Texan1211  replied to  JohnRussell @2.1.3    3 months ago

Why are you quoting another poster and attempting to argue with me over what someone else said?

Pay attention!

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.1.5  JohnRussell  replied to  Texan1211 @2.1.4    3 months ago

[]

 
 
 
charger 383
Professor Silent
2.1.6  charger 383  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.1.2    3 months ago

Worst thing that happened to the Republican Party was overturning Roe vs Wade,  It is a very important single issue to many and energized a lot of people.  

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.1.7  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  charger 383 @2.1.6    3 months ago

That is absolutely true.

However, Roe was wrongly decided and to fulfill their duty to the Constitution they had to rule the way they did.

The problem was the timing.

I only wish it hadn't happened until this coming January.

 
 
 
afrayedknot
Junior Quiet
2.1.8  afrayedknot  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.1.2    3 months ago

“How many women are wasting a vote on that single issue?”

That ‘single issue’ is obviously pertinent to many people, and not just to women.

It goes to the personal freedom to have control over one’s own personal life decisions regardless of where they reside and in spite of legislators, religious zealots, and short sighted candidates attempting to deny one the freedom to make an entirely personal choice. 

It also goes to show how utterly tone deaf some are. But they have the freedom (and temerity) to think they have the moral authority to push their desires thus effecting those who have to deal with the consequences.

Do continue with that line of reasoning as it is a losing battle, single issue or not. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.1.9  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  afrayedknot @2.1.8    3 months ago

That is what state elections are for.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
2.1.10  Greg Jones  replied to  JohnRussell @2.1.5    3 months ago

You're certainly not outwitting anyone

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
2.1.11  Sean Treacy  replied to  charger 383 @2.1.6    3 months ago
orst thing that happened to the Republican Party was overturning Roe vs Wad

There are almost no single issue voters, and it cuts both ways. People are much more loyal to their team and signaling that to peers than voting on a single issue. California passed all sorts of "conservative" citizen initiatives by ballot only to elect Democrats by landslides.  Or Ohio, where the governor signed a 6 week abortion ban, won reelection by 15 points and had  a constitutional amendment protecting abortion to birth pass.  It's either not that high a priority and they split on the issue and remain with the party in general, or the much more common situation is that their priorities are already all lined up with one party or the other so one issue doesn't matter.  One issue voters, really outside of, "Orange man bad" ultimately don't matter. 

Trump himself, is by leaps and bounds, the single worst thing that happened to the national Republican party.  One need only look where they were in 2014 (very pro-life)  to where they are now (won't even ban nine month abortion on the federal level). 

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
2.2  evilone  replied to  Texan1211 @2    3 months ago
Only the most devout sickophants will swallow the lie that Harris has 'evolved' on so many issues...

Which is why some advisors want her to stick to a character comparison with Trump. 

...but it doesn't matter, folks will cast a vote against Trump and vainly think they are 'saving democracy' or some other silly bullshit.

Isn't that the same shit the Trump campaign is doing - painting Trump as the White Knight that only he can save the country from the multicultural godless communists? 

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
2.2.1  Texan1211  replied to  evilone @2.2    3 months ago

Not being a Trump expert myself, nor giving a damn about him, I  will take your word.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
2.2.2  Tessylo  replied to  evilone @2.2    3 months ago

White Knight?  Isn't that the same as Grand Dragon?

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.2.3  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Tessylo @2.2.2    3 months ago

Why call him a racist?

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
2.2.4  Texan1211  replied to  Tessylo @2.2.2    3 months ago
Isn't that the same as Grand Dragon?

Ask Robert Byrd.

 
 
 
Thomas
Masters Guide
2.2.5  Thomas  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.2.3    3 months ago

He is just an equal opportunity asshole. If he hasn't thrown you or your group under the bus, wait, he will. Most everything he touches turns to shit: Just look at the Republican party.

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
2.2.6  MrFrost  replied to  Thomas @2.2.5    3 months ago
If he hasn't thrown you or your group under the bus, wait, he will.

512

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
3  Sean Treacy    3 months ago

I guess airing it on the Friday night of Labor Day weekend was a little too on the nose as a news dump, so the Thursday night heading  into it is the next best thing. 

It’s scary to realize the Democras who run the party  trusted a senile, compulsive liar with a microphone more than they do Kamala Harris, who needs a literal chaperone. 

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
3.1  Texan1211  replied to  Sean Treacy @3    3 months ago

Too bad Harris' handlers don't think she can handle a live interview.

They seem to have as much false, forced 'confidence' in her as they do with Biden.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.2  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Sean Treacy @3    3 months ago
It’s scary to realize the Democras who run the party  trusted a senile, compulsive liar with a microphone more than they do Kamala Harris, who needs a literal chaperone. 

But they told us he was the brightest man in the room in private.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4  author  Vic Eldred    3 months ago

Question of the day?

It wasn't that long ago when Carlson was the most watched political analyst on TV.

GWD47_9XoAEPKVh?format=jpg&name=small

Is he now only a footnote?

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
4.1  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @4    3 months ago

WGAF ?

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4.1.1  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @4.1    3 months ago

The people who liked to ask questions.

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
4.2  MrFrost  replied to  Vic Eldred @4    3 months ago

Is he now only a footnote?

A Russian footnote at that.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
5  author  Vic Eldred    3 months ago

GWCQemzWEAADA2q?format=jpg&name=small

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
5.1  MrFrost  replied to  Vic Eldred @5    3 months ago

He's scared...he should be.. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
6  author  Vic Eldred    3 months ago

GWJtWMPWEAA96Hq?format=jpg&name=small

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
6.1  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Vic Eldred @6    3 months ago

All due to the Biden / Harris policies.  Now with Harris running with zero policy, it indicates that she intends to keep the current policy in place causing even more problems for the country.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
6.1.1  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @6.1    3 months ago

If she wins, we can expect a quick return to the radical Biden policies.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
6.1.2  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Vic Eldred @6.1.1    3 months ago

That's a given.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
6.1.3  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @6.1.1    3 months ago

Ya!  WHEN she wins

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
6.1.4  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Tessylo @6.1.3    3 months ago

She really didn't get a bump off the convention.

Could this be as good as it gets for her?

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
6.1.5  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @6.1.4    3 months ago

Keep wishing and hoping and praying and see where that gets ya!

The sane world is sick of the former 'president' convicted felon and rapist.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
6.1.6  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Tessylo @6.1.5    3 months ago
The sane world

The sane world being your little euphemism for the hard left?

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
6.1.7  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @6.1.6    3 months ago

The 70% of the world that is not in the cult of the convicted felon and rapist.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
6.1.8  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Tessylo @6.1.7    3 months ago

How did you come up with 70%?

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
7  Jeremy Retired in NC    3 months ago
Jack Smith is trying to keep a Trump indictment in the news.

Smith is trying the same indictment that Judge Cannon threw out.  This time he filed with a judge that is a friend.  The partisan political persecution continues.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
7.1  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @7    3 months ago
This time he filed with a judge that is a friend. 

100% correct.

Does anyone doubt this is simply a scheme to defeat Trump?

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
7.2  JBB  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @7    3 months ago

The New Trump indictments are in DC for Jan 6th. They just "Supercede" the former Jan 6th indictments in accordance with new laws...

How do you not know about this?

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
7.2.1  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  JBB @7.2    3 months ago
How do you not know this?

I pay attention.  

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
7.2.2  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  JBB @7.2    3 months ago
The New Trump indictments are in DC for January 6th.

A place where one can indict Trump for breathing.

Nobody is buying it anymore.

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
7.2.3  JBB  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @7.2.1    3 months ago

[]

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
7.2.4  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  JBB @7.2.3    3 months ago
Does that explain you not knowing shit?

I notice you haven't proven me wrong (again).  

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
7.2.5  Sean Treacy  replied to  JBB @7.2    3 months ago
hey just "Supercede" the former Jan 6th indictments in accordance with new laws..

There are no new laws. 

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
7.2.6  Tessylo  replied to  JBB @7.2    3 months ago

Isn't that awesome?  They had a different grand jury for this one!

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
7.2.7  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @7.2.2    3 months ago

True - the sane world has had enough of the convicted felon.   

Buh-bye!

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
7.2.8  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Tessylo @7.2.6    3 months ago

A real humdinger!

It took them all of 5 minutes.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
7.2.9  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Tessylo @7.2.7    3 months ago
Buh-bye!

We'll have to all tune in on election night.

Do you think there will be another water main break at the Fulton County polling office?

 
 
 
charger 383
Professor Silent
7.2.10  charger 383  replied to  Vic Eldred @7.2.9    3 months ago

they might try a power failure this time

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
7.2.11  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  charger 383 @7.2.10    3 months ago

I'll never forget that. Laura Ingraham said "for some reason the vote count has stopped in Fulton County Georgia."

Then Fulton County announced a water main burst, which turned into a backed-up toilet.

Poll watchers were forced to leave. The cameras caught them going through ballots.

Whether it was legit or not, it looked rotten.

 
 
 
charger 383
Professor Silent
7.2.12  charger 383  replied to  Vic Eldred @7.2.11    3 months ago

Just enough time for somebody to tamper.  Trust in elections was damaged again

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
8  author  Vic Eldred    3 months ago

Questions for Kamala via the editors of the National Review:

  • You have called for legislation imposing term limits for Supreme Court justices. The Senate Democrats’ term-limits bill would strip two of the sitting justices of the right to vote in most cases. Do you support that idea?

  • In your previous campaign, you called for banning fracking and offshore drilling. Is this still your position, and if not, what have you learned that has changed your mind?

  • In 2019, you said, “I strongly believe that we need to have Medicare for All” and released your own plan to move every American into a new Medicare system within ten years. Do you still support establishing a single-payer system? If not, why were you wrong then?

  • You supported abolishing Immigration and Customs Enforcement and “starting from scratch.” Would you still reorganize the government in this way, and if not, what in your experience as vice president changed?

  • After special counsel Robert Hur raised questions about Joe Biden’s age in February, you said the characterization “could not be more wrong on the facts.” But Biden showed signs of his age at the presidential debate that were consistent with that report and that ultimately led him to step down from the ticket. What do you say to those Americans who now question your judgment or your candor?

  • You say you are going to begin lowering prices on Day One of your administration. What would you do that the Biden-Harris administration hasn’t? And why hasn’t it done it?

  • Previously, on immigration, you have said, “We are not going to treat people who are undocumented and cross the border as criminals” and “an undocumented immigrant is not a criminal.” In your current campaign, you have described yourself as somebody who is going to be tough on the border. How do you square this?

  • In 2021, Biden announced that you would “lead our efforts with Mexico and the Northern Triangle” and other countries to help with “stemming the migration to our southern border.” Do you accept any responsibility for the mass migration at the border that has happened during the administration?

  • In September 2022, you said, “The border is secure” and “we have a secure border.” Do you think our border is secure right now?

  • You have spoken about price gouging as the cause of higher prices. Is your contention that roughly $24 trillion in federal spending and $6 trillion in new public debt have nothing to do with the high inflation of recent years?

  • The tax increases that you propose are not enough to cover your other spending proposals. Do you believe that the $35 trillion in federal debt is too high? If so, what do you plan to do about it?

  • You now say you want to exempt tips from federal taxes. Why? Aren’t tips income?

  • You have said you support Israel’s right to defend itself. Does that mean you believe that Israel has the right to destroy Hamas? If not, how can Israelis be secure with Hamas still intact?

  • As president, will you continue the Biden’s administration efforts to rejoin the Iran nuclear deal? If not, would you support reimposing sanctions on Iran?

  • Would you provide material, logistical, and intelligence support to an Israeli operation aimed at preventing Iran from developing a nuclear weapon?

  • Should the Ukrainians be allowed to use U.S. weapons to target Russian forces in pre-war Russian territory, and if not, why not?

  • Would you militarily defend Taiwan against an invasion from the mainland, as President Biden pledged to do?

  • In 2020, you said, “I unequivocally agree with the goal of reducing the defense budget” and added that you wanted to send that money to “communities in need.” Do you still believe this?

  • Do you support the elimination of the legislative filibuster in the Senate?

  • Is there any stage of pregnancy in which abortion should be restricted by law?

  • Looking back at the Biden-Harris administration’s record, what would you have done differently if you had been president?

  • The Biden-Harris administration has suspended granting new permits to export liquefied natural gas. Maintaining the supply of LNG is critical to our European allies as they adjust their economies to the absence of Russian gas. Will you end the permitting “pause”?

  • In 2019, you favored spending taxpayers’ money to forcefully confiscate all 20-plus million of the most commonly owned rifles in the United States. Do you still want to do this, and if not, why not?

  • Were any of Trump’s tariffs mistaken? Follow-up: Then why hasn’t your administration moved to repeal any of them?

  • Governor Walz, you like to say your fellow Minnesotans’ motto is, “Mind your own damn business.” Yet you instituted a hotline for people to report on their neighbors during the Covid lockdowns, and you signed a bill that makes it possible to separate parents from their own children who seek “gender-affirming care” in your state. Do these things count as minding your own business?

    Questions for Kamala Harris in CNN Interview | National Review
 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
8.1  Sean Treacy  replied to  Vic Eldred @8    3 months ago

She'll get "questions" like:  Why is Trump so bad and weird?  How do you manage to be so joyful when trump is so mean to you?  How awesome will it be to be the first woman President?  

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
8.1.1  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Sean Treacy @8.1    3 months ago

And afterwards Dana Bash and Kamala will check into a motel.

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
8.1.2  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Vic Eldred @8.1.1    3 months ago

jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
8.1.3  Sean Treacy  replied to  Sean Treacy @8.1    3 months ago

Saw a question. It was as bad as expected. Basically:  " why did you switch positions, is it because you are so much more experienced and knowledgeable now?" It's basically a question with a suggested answer.  The type you can't ask in court because it leads the witness to the answer. 

And no transcript of the interview will be provided, just 18 edited minutes... 

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
8.1.4  Texan1211  replied to  Sean Treacy @8.1.3    3 months ago

Let's see if the follow up question is "What exactly did you learn that made you change positions?"

The correct answer is likely "I learned that my positions didn't poll well".

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
8.1.6  Sean Treacy  replied to  Texan1211 @8.1.4    3 months ago

see if the follow up question is "What exactly did you learn that made you change positions?

I think the follow up will be "you are so brave. thank you for being so perfect" 

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
8.1.7  Texan1211  replied to  Sean Treacy @8.1.6    3 months ago

Probably not going to he anything worth watching.

Softballs make poor questions.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
8.1.8  Sean Treacy  replied to  Texan1211 @8.1.7    3 months ago

Softballs make poor questions.

no doubt. The only question is can she hit a home run in the most favorable situation possible. Softball questions and the assurance that only the "best" answers will be released with no transcript of the entire interview. 

As Maze on twitter said:

Just two weeks ago Dana Bash selectively cut a clip of Elon and Trump talking so she could present it out of context and claim that the two were downplaying the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Imagine the editing being done on tonight’s interview.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
9  author  Vic Eldred    3 months ago

An official in the Denver suburb of Aurora is fed up with leaders in her state for allowing sanctuary policies that  rolled out the proverbial welcome mat to Venezuelan prison gang Tren de Aragua  and the violent crime it has unleashed onto her community.

City Council member Danielle Jurinsky has served as a leading voice against providing incentives to migrants in Aurora — especially after the council passed a resolution in February saying it will refuse to offer aid for migrants from neighboring cities.

However, Aurora’s bigger neighbor next door — Denver — is a sanctuary city, which has continued to attract more migrants, many of them from Venezuela.

Tren de Aragua has come with them — and the gang is spilling into Aurora.

Aurora official slams Denver's sanctuary city policies over gang crime (nypost.com)

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
10  Greg Jones    3 months ago

A local radio and TV personality gave a pretty good breakdown of reasons for not electing Harris.

Caldara: Why I'm voting for Donald Trump - Complete Colorado

 
 

Who is online

JBB
Gazoo


43 visitors