'Secret to winning!' MAGA fans cheer as Trump pledges to put Confederate names on bases
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
Former President Donald Trump kicked off a North Carolina campaign rally with a pledge to slap the names of Confederate generals on military bases — and was met with overwhelming cheers.
Trump's promise to re-instate the name of Fort Bragg — stripped from the base after the violent death of George Floyd, a Black man, under a police officer's knee — was met with cries of celebration, video of the event shows.
"Should we change the name from Fort Liberty back to Fort Bragg?" Trump asked the crowd. "I'm doing it. And we're leading in all the polls, we should get elected. Remember this, they cheat like hell. Too big to rig. We need too big to rig."
Gram Slattery, a reporter for Reuters, explained the fort was named after Braxton Bragg, who was "widely considered among the Confederacy's worst generals and a very stern slaveowner."
Trump went on later in the speech to add , "I think I just learned the secret to winning absolutely and by massive margins. I'm gonna promise to you ... that we're gonna change the name back to Fort Bragg."
The former president appeared delighted that a soldier had faced jeers for referring to the North Carolina base by its official name.
"This great looking soldier just accidentally said Fort Liberty," Trump said. "He almost got booed the hell out of the place!"
Many social media commenters professed themselves shocked both by Trump's promise and the overwhelming response he received.
Independent congressional reporter Jamie Dupree argued Trump was obsessed with a past defeat.
"Trump is still mad that the Pentagon changed the names of military bases named for Confederate generals," wrote Dupree. "He vetoed a major military policy bill with that provision, but Congress overrode his veto."
Retired Marine fighter pilot and former Senate candidate Amy McGrath was blunt in her criticism of Trump and the crowd.
"He’s really going after the racist, un-enlightened, clinging to the lost cause of the confederacy vote," wrote McGrath. "That’s actually a minority of the military/veteran community in 2024. There are old guys who care about base names. Post 911 vets either don’t care or welcome the change."
Tags
Who is online
510 visitors
Another day, another unhinged rally.
Could it just be that Americans admire people who go against the grain?
you are on to something
It’s beyond merely “going against the grain”. The U.S. is the only country I can think of that honors those who have committed treason! ☹️
(Honoring the by making statues of them … and naming buildings after them).
Have been for a while.
As I always say, "Variety is the Spice of Life".
Who committed treason?
'against the grain'?
Is that what they're calling batshit crazy nowadays?
Every CSA soldier, officer and camp follower who took up arms against the Union committed treason according to the definition of the Constitution.
Their parole and/or amnesty doesn't lessen the fact that they were traitors.
The expression is known as a euphemism.
The Confederacy-- in fact they send many to battle againgst the U.S.-- they tried to kill as many American soldiers as possible. (Sounds like treason to me).
No kidding.
The former 'president' traitor is going back to Butler where the first assassination 'attempt' took place and Vance and Musk and his White House doctor quack Ronny Jackson will be there also. It's scheduled for today, Saturday.
Crooked Donald wants sympathy for his ailing campaign. And Elon Musk has really 'ran out.' The richest man around loves rabid lies and liars! Go figure. And I will not forgive Musk for supporting hurting and targeting people who don't share his worldview!
Trump is still mad that the Confederacy lost the Civil War, and he vows not to let it happen next time.
Ssssh. He's capable of CAUSING it.
He is and his followers certainly are, too. Here are some of them from January 6th.
Yea, that "civil war" went well, huh?
It's like they were invited by the former 'president' by inciting them like he has been ever since he lost, for more than 4 years now. The traitor incited the coup/insurrection as you can see by the shirts to those who he invited that 'it would be wild' these white supremacists there are just a small example of all the traitors that day including the former 'president' traitor who incited them in the first place..
Bunch of incels like a lot of his supporters/cult members.
What exactly did he say to "incite" them?
Is peacefully and patriotically an incitement to you?
I had no idea how bad this speech was until I read most of the transcript, same victim, same demonizing, same divineness ad nauseum for 71 minutes.
Transcript Of Trump's Speech At Rally Before Capitol Riot : NPR
.....so the traitor said 'peacefully' in the first five minutes of that 70 some minutes of incitement..........
He, by that speech and others, doesn't want to understand that we always count ALL of the votes, no matter how many hours or days it takes to open the mail in ballots or overseas ballots within the legal limits of that jurisdiction.
It simply doesn't matter that he had 66 million in 2016 and 74 million in 2020, it matters what the opposition had.
It simply doesn't matter that he had the lead in the swing states at 10PM EST, the country has several time zones that must be still be counted.
And in the end it only mattered what the Electoral College vote was.
He lost by every reasonable measure.
He lost 62 cases in court, a third of those judges, Trump appointees.
He lost.
He is still losing.
How about giving some examples of that "incitement".
and
about 30 seconds before finishing.
Old tweets show Raskin, Biden saying 'fight like hell' (nypost.com)
Why haven't they been charged with inciting an insurrection?
I imagine common sense would have something to do with that, they were tweets.
Trump was standing 30 feet away from a crowd he described as hundreds of thousands all the way back to the end of the Reflection Pool. He was shouting, he was imploring he was trying to convince his loyal crowd that they needed to act NOW.
Where is the target insurrection to a tweet?
Because it is ok when they do it
Yea....nice spin but fail.
Tweets reach far more people than a few thousand standing in the same vicinity.
Why did you not show your outrage at them inciting violence?
And in many cases, encouraged by their politicians.
So where are the spontaneous insurrections you think you can charge Raskin or Biden for?
Thats a very week deflection. Tweets from 2017, 2019 and 2020 from both impeachments?
WATCH: Trump used ‘fight’ or ‘fighting’ 20 times in rally speech, Dean says | PBS News
Sorry for your lack of understanding. I didn't follow Rep Raskin or citizen Biden then and have never followed anyone on Twitter, ever, hence no outrage at shit I don't read or know about.
They were inciting violence, at least that is the theory you, et al are using against Trump.
"Sorry for your lack of understanding. :
Right back at you
"I didn't follow Rep Raskin or citizen Biden then and have never followed anyone on Twitter, ever, hence no outrage at shit I don't read or know about. "
And millions of Americans follow the same about Trump, but yet, liberals (should I say some or a few, or is most OK?) seem to claim all republicans are rabid Trump supporters, and therefore should be treated as traitors to the country.
The mindset is hilarious in a sad way.
My how you carry on...
GG didn't say THAT image depicted a civil war, he simply pointed out that there are those who were ready for it.
Those were supposedly people at the Capital on J6.
The left tries incessantly to say they tried to overthrow the government, ie, a civil war.
I stated that did not go well.
I understood the post just fine.
Again you misinterpret what is clearly not the case.
When someone says these diehard Trump supporters who are blind to his faults and lies are members of a cult,
You protest rather than ignore the comments.
That you take umbrage for yourself as well as others is a tell.
Sorry
Context. Situation awareness. "Reading the room." So, it is clear, it is not the words themselves stated in a particular order that rises to the occasion of incitement it is how those words are rendered in context of the hearers. And of course, wisdom in discernment is involved too!
For example, if I say, 'This upcoming election will be bloodless if some conservatives let it.' People are going to want a clarification of my statement, because the statement is open for interpretation.
Because liberals are not known for their war-mongering, and injustice towards some conservatives. Of course, how some conservatives receive liberal intents and desires is a study all its own.
Are you disappointed that it didn't?
The point is trump supporters were espousing a civil war and apparently willing to initiate one. Their first attempt failed, but there are many of them who see that as just a first effort and want to try it again.
Then maybe you need to tell a prosecutor to charge them with treason because that is what you say they tried to do.
but as of now, alas for you, no treason charges.
Your comment supportive of Trump's anti-American neo-fascist cult is noted.
Are those Trump supporters or FBI informants?
That's an interesting paranoid conspiracy theory.
I guess CNN and MSNBC did not tell you that there were federal undercover officers in the J6 crowd. I would be pissed for them lying to me.
Exclusive | FBI lost count of number of informants at Capitol on Jan. 6: ex-official (nypost.com)
According to the NY Post -
- there were federal undercover officers.
That's fucking hilarious.
OK how about Newsweek? Probably far right wing now, huh?
Ex-Capitol Police Chief Thinks 'Multiple' Fed. Agents Were in Jan. 6 Crowd - Newsweek
How about little known Headliner USA?
Number of Undercovers in Jan. 6 Crowd Now up to At Least 40, Court Filings Says | Headline USA
If you don't believe the sources (At least I provide them), how about showing proof they are wrong....
That's hilarious that you're alluding to the alleged FBI informants amongst the white supremacists in the failed insurrection that day. That they're the ones with the shirts pre-printed with the day of the insurrection that the former 'president' traitor incited.
WOW
Freaking hilarious.
Don't you think we would have heard from these FBI informants by now?
I'd forgotten all about that batshit crazy nonsense.
I'll stick with MY opinion, but thanks for trying.
Ex-Capitol Police Chief Thinks 'Multiple' Fed. Agents Were in Jan. 6 Crowd - Newsweek
THINKS
lol
I rest my case
So, the New York Post (a must read for trump cultists) actually took print space away from its usual stories about UFOs to feed other paranoid conspiracies. Really fascinating.
I provided 2 more sources for your reading enjoyment. You might want to read them. One, Newsweek, is a well known left wing publication, but when the left does not like anything a news source reports, they are immediately far right week.
still can't prove me wrong (notice no question mark)
[Deleted.][✘]
Newsweek is the source where the alleged source says 'thinks' and the other source is probably some random blog.
Too easy....
Whistleblower: FBI had informants, officers in Capitol on Jan 6 (americanmilitarynews.com)
You still haven't disproved what I previously posted.
Still haven't disproven anything
That's credible. (Sarcasm in case anyone doesn't get it.)
Headline USA – Bias and Credibility
"conspiracy theories" -- As I was saying...
Pretty funny you far leftists have to attack all three sources provided, only one being outside the norm.
Do you think Newsweek is far right?
Your argument so far is lacking merit.
BTW....neither you nor your friend has been able to prove anything I posted wrong, only attack the sources. [Deleted][✘]
It is the credible source that says their alleged source 'thinks' ......yup - all they got is projection and batshit crazy conspiracy theories.
Thanks for disproving the other 'source'
No attacking, disproving.
Still can't disprove anything, only attack the sources. Again, at least I provide them.
Not attacking, disproving.
But you haven't.
Try again
Wow, what an ignorant and pitifully stupid comment. [✘] You can fool yourself with that idiocy, but there is no such thing as a "far left wing reactionary". The use of that term is pathetic neo-fascist propaganda.
but he cannot prove it, it's just his gut feeling about how the FBI works
Questionable source with little to no standing.
What were in the crowd would not have been officers or agents, but paid informants and I would suspect that there will be many coming forward in 20 years or so.
Yes, mad the Confederacy lost! (He obviously has a sever case of “The South Shall Rise Again Itis!)
He is a racist, period.....Fuck the confederacy and all that it stood/stands for and anyone that follows it today including all the MAGA POS.
While he’s at it, he should change the gop mascot from an elephant to an ostrich.
When one’s head is stuck in the sand, is flightless, and lays the largest of eggs, it seems comparatively reasonable.
Waiting for the donkey v. ass comments surely to follow, as following in lieu of original thought is predictably expected.
The Confederacy engaged in a war against the United States-- that's obviously treason!
Is it really any wonder why Trump and his cadre of faithful white nationalists, white supremacists and misogynists still revere their racist confederate ancestors? They imagine themselves the victims and underdogs fighting for "their" America which in their minds is one of white evangelical males with little to no higher education (which they see as indoctrination) because facts about the confederacy and facts about their deep-seated racism are uncomfortable and frankly, they like wallowing and stewing in their own stupidity and bigotry, they take to it like pigs take to mud.
They take pride in their heritage that is deeply rooted in treason. They're still bitter and angry that their ancestors lost the civil war and there are a bunch of those violent morons who want another shot at destroying our nation and replacing it with a vile racist authoritarian government that caters only to white Christian nationalists and legalizes segregation and criminalizes homosexuality or anything that doesn't confirm to their misogynistic racist white Christian ideology. That's what Trump represents and why they fight so hard to get him elected, he is their hero, champion and new messiah who has convinced them only he can give them their "Promised Land" of a racist white Christian nation.
Less time wasted on what bases are named and more time spent on mission readiness. One wonders how many boots, bullets and bombs were not bought because of money spent on name changes.
Stupid!
No remark about Crooked Donald pandering. Also, if boots, bullets, and bombs are not bought due to name changes. . .it's STUPIDER to spend the money changing back!
By the way, war is so over-rated. Time for the nations of the world, 'gang-up' for PEACE. In which case, after nations 'sign on' for peace, . . .nations which go to war. . should be over-ran by "the community of nations" and dissolved! That would fix warring fools in leadership the world over!
Of course, if dissolving a state, or states, is not sufficient enough. . . the Community of states, with the power vested in it should invade, singular or multiple states involved in warring against the other. (It's food for thought, anyway.)
Are you advocating that we go to war against such countries?
A "community of nations" - could be all nations gang up on the insufferable fools which gain power and make the world suffer for their having done so! Adults should be more responsible! Time they realize it. Find better ways to solve problems, besides gore, ruin, destruction, loss, and 'hell on Earth'! A community of peace-loving nations (even if it is the only policy on which they all agree).
The suffering children of the world would appreciate Peace. That thing imagined, but they hear rumored about in other parts of the world. The world nations-the adults-of the world should ADVOCATE and come together to DEMAND world peace (instead of sitting around 'eternally' wringing their hands and spinning their wheels)!
Our racist president, Woodrow Wilson, called his construct The League of Nations, the US never joined.
opinions do vary.
My remains unchanged
[✘] But thanks anyway ……
Time to join such contracts—Now! War is stupid. Ask children under the 'pounding.' Adults starting wars with other countries are STUPID and can't possibly care about children.
Contracts?
How is the UN working out for you.
Please make a solid point. . . or Bust.'
I can’t make a more solid point than you’re “War is Stupid”
Motown made a solid point:
”I said, war, huh (good God, y'all)
What is it good for?
Absolutely nothing, just say it again
War (whoa), huh (oh Lord)
What is it good for?
Absolutely nothing, listen to me”
I was sitting here today watching evening television when a (charity) ad came on; it displayed hungry children in war-torn settings who need. . . help. . . and the plead is "help me" from the commercial - give $10 dollars monthly.
It angered me. One more charity to add to the growing lists of desperate children in the world in need. In need.
What if their foolish nation/s just stop killing and destroying themselves. What if the adults thought of their children with respect for their lives and their 'living' in squalor due to the acts and misadventures in fighting and conflicts with their neighbors.
Those children in the ad and in war-torn lands would have 'ready' futures of peace. If, and its a big if, the foolish, ridiculous, ADULTS would put down their guns, boots, and bombs, and made peace work for the sake of their children. (Whom are living in squalor, filth, insecurity, and growing up "stunted" and fearful every day of their young lives-RIGHT NOW.)
You are lucky.
Hard men and women stand ready to defend your ability to verbalize such lofty opinions. Myself, I prefer to take care of our own first and do so generously every year. If there is money left over after that then by all means help other parts of the world. When government agencies like FEMA run out of money to take care of our own because they are taking care of the huddled masses of the world, an adjustment is needed.
Easy for you to judge in your protected, comfortable environment. You’d feel differently if you and yours were missing needed US aid because it was being given to say, illegal immigrants instead.
That said, no country provides more aid to the rest of the world than the USA. Either through funding of the UN or direct general public and private aid.
Get properly informed.
Why is Trump sucking up to Confederate sympathizers ?
Not everyone pisses their pants when they see a confederate flag.
Now would you like to address my actual comment or keep deflecting?
I might piss on it, but not in my pants.
Can you answer the question.
[✘]
If there is money left over after that then by all means help other parts of the world.
What an oblivious comment. The first rule of government funding is use it or lose it. Your kind would be buying everything under the sun for domestic consumption and using the scraps leftover to plant flower beds in alleyways before you’d help another part of the world.
No. Just the usual hive minded drone nonsense, and the old stand by, 'opinions vary'
Confederate generals were, almost without exception , traitors to the United States. Why should they have their names on American military bases ?
That comment missed the point in an attempt to be professorial. I don't need lecturing. I don't cause wars nor ask for support for them. End wars. Don't 'talk' them up. Wars are not important in the larger-scheme of life. Time to 're-imagine' them. The children of the world will respect adults who can end War through Peace!
Dominance.
More emotional nonsense. Your completely ignore:
Yep, get properly informed.
Meanwhile American citizens are suffering directly or indirectly because of it. Sounds like you just are fine with that as long as it isn’t you or yours.
[deleted][✘]
Yep, neither do I.
In the DoD we get 5 kinds of appropriations. The life of the dollar is 1 - 10 yrs before losing it depending on appropriation type.
No they aren't. They are suffering because of a thousand year weather event from a CAT 4 Hurricane which most people in it's path ignored.
In the end, almost every local, county and state government will have been judged to have not given Helene due respect.
I have family in NOAA, in Ashville, that work at the Federal building, the family evacuated to a SC camp to work remotely
but no one in Ashville could be convinced until 6:55AM the day the hurricane arrived and stalled over Buncombe County.
They underestimated, pure and simple; they were already at 9 inches of rain saturation before Helene arrived.
Milton is right behind it but not "expected" to veer north, another storm is forming behind Milton.
That cannot be blamed on budgeting or politics. Individuals or herd mentality, yes to a small degree.
Mayorkas said that leaving replenishment of the disaster relief fund out of the temporary spending bill, could affect what is available in the coming weeks because Congress went on a three week pre election recess without addressing ongoing mid western wild fires and approaching hurricanes.
In reality, it's going to be a couple of years before Ashville reaches a semblance of what it was last week.
American People will continue to suffer and no amount of money or resources can fix what they have lost.
You got that very right.
Mission readiness is never affected by changing the letterhead on the paperwork. In fact depending on the software and version of printers, it's been easy. More money was probably spent on capable ink jet printers than anything else.
One months worth of 155 shells to Ukraine. $39million to change the signage and paperwork for 10 bases.
Congress appropriated it. Now if you want to cut back on stupid military spending, maybe you could make a case to curbing
the use of erectile dysfunction medicine which the services spent $84.24 million on in FY2018.
I agree. Also, those who have gender confusion not be paid by taxpayers via the military to get a sex change.
Another waste of money.
From 2016 through 2021 the combined military health care system spent $3 million annually on transgender therapy and medicine.
That included $3.1 million for surgeries. Trump blocked all treatments in 2017 and the matters are now creeping along in 4 separate lawsuits. The people involved included Purple Heart recipients, Bronze Star winners, attack aviators, Navy SEALs and other heroes now stuck in partial transition.
Tricare does not cover gender dystrophia at all.
Tricare apparently spends $41 million annually on Viagra & Cialis.
3 million too much. The money should have gone to barracks of our single soldiers/sailors. There has been many stories about the deplorable conditions of those barracks.
" Trump blocked all treatments in 2017 "
And should have stayed that way.
"The people involved included Purple Heart recipients, Bronze Star winners, attack aviators, Navy SEALs and other heroes now stuck in partial transition."
Should never have been able to start on the taxpayer's dime.
"Tricare does not cover gender dystrophia at all."
Good. I don't want taxpayer money going to treat mental conditions disguised as "dysphoria". I and most of my fellow veterans would rather Tricare money go to legitimate health conditions.
"Tricare apparently spends $41 million annually on Viagra & Cialis."
See above
How would trumpists know it is a waste of time and money. . . not like 'any' of those guys and dolls ever plan on getting a sex change. Hey! Maybe a trumpist should volunteer for a sex change. . . the experience can be a talking point afterwards—for or against!
How about responding to what I wrote. I never said anything about a waste of time.
I said waste of money.
"You want. . . ." Does not apply across the board in government decision-making, anymore than what anybody else wants. The government has to make decisions to 'fix' its people and sometimes I, you, we, won't like it. It's the nature of government business.
Never said it did, but I, as an American AND a veteran, should have more of an understanding of how most of our servicemembers, past and present, feel about giving money for mental diseases disguised as something legitimate.
And what have you done about it?
Thankfully not your decision.
The tyranny of the majority? I could care less what your unprofessional opinions about medical issues are.
If they wear the uniform and do the job, they deserve every bit of respect as all the rest, period. Respect the rank. If they excel, they deserve the same promotion opportunities without the baggage of the Cave Men Mentality. Same as the soldiers who aren't white males with more testosterone than education.
Like PTSD, shell shock and that thousand yard stare? In WWl you could be court martialed or executed.
It wasn't until 2009 that SCOTUS recognized that PTSD was real and affected violent crime in veterans.
Now everyone seems to have a little ptsd episode in their lives. /s
It wasn't until 2016 that the military recognized that gender issues are real and treatable.
You may think you can stop it, but the most you can do is slow down progress.
In your case I feel this is a waste of time.
It is because we should not be wasting money on disguised mental deficiencies just to make someone feel better.
I'm glad you understand.
Again, the medical professions and the government don't care about your feelings. Their job is to insure we all have the same rights and opportunities regardless of our differences both seen and unseen.
Hilarious coming from someone who belongs to a group who supports millions of unvetted illegals and asked what they have provided personally for these illegals, the silence is deafening.
"Thankfully not your decision."
It sure is based on who I vote for. Hopefully, Trump will once again put a stop to thos waste of money and use it for the real betterment of our troops.
"If they wear the uniform and do the job, they deserve every bit of respect as all the rest, period. Respect the rank. If they excel, they deserve the same promotion opportunities without the baggage of the Cave Men Mentality. Same as the soldiers who aren't white males with more testosterone than education."
Respect does not mean giving into mental diseases. They need help, not faux respect. If they excel, then they do deserve the same opportunities, no one is disputing that, but they need to excel as the sex they joined as and not wait until after they join then decide to mooch off taxpayers for a mental disease.
"Like PTSD, shell shock and that thousand yard stare?"
Yes, like that. Not wanting to be a different sex because you just feel like it.
It wasn't until 2016 that the military recognized that gender issues are real and treatable."
Obama DoD. Not surprised.
Gender issues are treatable but not by throwing taxpayer dollars at something that does not do anything positive for any individual. Many of those that get the change regret it later and wish they never had it done. Those are reported but assuringly, many more not reported feel the same way.
I never asked them to so you are arguing something never said.
I don't believe you do understand .
Then I can no longer help you and we are done.
That depends on a 'whole' number of variables. . . including age-factor, because age alone could make some opinions dated. The new services/members largely want an armed forces which work for all Americans and not just those in 'lock-step' with past service politics and policies.
And since I am uncomfortable talking about you and your feelings—I won't do so. Moving on.
The "powers that be" want servicemembers to be happy in their own skin, because in being so, they will render more efficiency. The only requirement being, which it is for all servicemembers, that servicemembers cause no harm to others around whom they work.
I am American. I am a veteran. I am homosexually-inclined, too.
What the fuck are you talking about now? Do your proof read this shit?
Well there is the needle in the haystack that we can agree on. Congratulations.
Hopefully he loses so all Americans are treated more equally, not less. Any savings the grifter causes will probably find a way into Mar A lago.
Again, if you believe the Constitution, your personal unmedical opinion is meaningless, a personal bias, not factual.
You haven't a clue, do you?
I don't need help thank goodness.
But if you are struck by lightning some day and wake up as a woman, I know a great surgeon who can help you
from the therapy to the final product. She used to be a NASA astronaut (Flight Surgeon) who transitioned and is a happy fulfilled person now with thriving medical practices focused on plastic surgery, every thing from facelifts to gender reassignment.
It was the Navy's loss and her triumph.
I have her number if you should ever need it.
Snuck premises (in bold). Do provide professional proof that transsexualism is a mental disease. Please proceed. . . .
Then you would probably be shocked to know that Iran agrees with your opinion that these people need psychological help and refuses to recognize trans people until after they transition on the governments dime to the person they wish to be and only then they are recognized as full citizens.
This has been their law since 1987
The Iranians? Can you imagine that?
He cannot, it's just his opinion.
"Many" is abstract. Give us percentages, if you please. And, since trumpists majorly care about narrow and 'simple' categories of gender ( people)—trumpists, actually, are unfit to discuss gender issues. No one should ask for trumpists opinions. . .they are 'baked in' this stream of consciousness already!
And this is the most galling part of it! We have narrow-minded people seeking a 'reset' of the times we live in to the past 'glory' days of their choosing. Some conservatives are about their IDEOLOGY and it stirs nothing in them that others are unhappy 'trying' to live like conservatives. . . when they clearly are not conservative.
Let me be clear, there is not much wrong with conservativism—for CONSERVATIVES.
It is the conservative 'yearning' to have sway and control over the lives of others in our society (whom pay their societal dues too just like and equal to themselves) that creates. . . CULTURE WARS out of whole cloth and a willingness to meddle, demonize, and otherize their fellow citizens!
Always the case.
Truth
Some conservatives want LGBTQ and Others to have a relatively small footprint in the country. Basically, be hidden, be second-classed, and be 'defeated' (suppressed) and that makes them very happy and comfortable. . . Others, we, will be very sad and uncomfortable about it.
Maybe if you served you can have a little more skin in the game. I don’t know if you have or not, but from your responses on this thread, you have absolutely no idea what you are talking about.
‘What the fuck are you talking about now? Do you proof read this shit’
I know exactly what i am talking about. Perhaps you need to reread what I posted so you can understand. No need to have a meltdown.
‘.Well there is the needle in the haystack that we can agree on. Congratulations’
i vote based on who can do the best for the country not like many leftists who vote based on feelings.
‘Hopefully he loses so all Americans are treated more equally, not less’
How were Americans treated differently during his first term? The rest was just a feelings dominated rant.
‘Again, if you believe the Constitution, your personal unmedical opinion is meaningless, a personal bias, not factual’
Show where said my opinion was factual. You can’t.
’You haven't a clue, do you’
I’m not the one that needs to get a clue.
‘He cannot, it's just his opinion.’
show where I said otherwise
Makes no difference if someone is allegedly a service member or not, they could not understand possibly how anyone else is feeling, don't believe it, or anything they say even about them allegedly serving.
So you just said you never served.
You had skin in the game when you served, thanks for your service.
Since you responded to yourself, I totally agree.
Remember this?
Then why bother typing anything? Pretty lame answer.
But Trump is opposed to a powerful American military (for example, he is opposed to powerful ties with our friends and allies, and wants to weaken NATO).
What makes you assume we can't do both?
So, when this POS was president, he vetoed a bill because it allowed for the renaming of certain bases. Congress actually overrode that veto, demonstrating it had broad bipartisan support.
Most of the Army forts have now been renamed.
Well, it's Saturday. . . and Crooked Donald's eyes are open. . .and the LIES have begun - AGAIN! Who has it in them to spend four more years of Crooked Donald's LIES!
I’m surprised he hasn’t advocated for changing all of them to simply add the word “Trump” in front of them. You know, just for the sake of consistency.
I'm all for renaming a federal penitentiary where Trump could serve out the rest of his life after him.
Awesome!