Nancy Pants is a Badass!

  
By:  al Jizzerror  •  4 months ago  •  180 comments


Nancy Pants is a Badass!
"I want him to come. I want to punch him out!"

Sponsored by group SiNNERs and ButtHeads

SiNNERs and ButtHeads


Nancy Pelosi wanted to "punch out" The Donald On January 6th.

Unfortunately the Secret Service protected Trump from Nancy.

I would have loved to see Nancy knock that lying motherfucker down on his fat ass.


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
al Jizzerror
Junior Expert
1  author  al Jizzerror    4 months ago

I can sympathize with Nancy.

I would love to have the opportunity to punch out Trump.

 
 
 
Gsquared
Senior Expert
1.1  Gsquared  replied to  al Jizzerror @1    3 months ago

I bet Trump is terrified of her.  For real.  He wouldn't stand a chance and he knows it.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.1.1  devangelical  replied to  Gsquared @1.1    3 months ago

the stark contrast in leadership during the constitutionally mandated process that day is indisputable.

 
 
 
pat wilson
Professor Guide
1.2  pat wilson  replied to  al Jizzerror @1    3 months ago

jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif Ha ! Get in line al Jizzerror.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
1.3  Tessylo  replied to  al Jizzerror @1    3 months ago

Just looking at trumpturd's itty bitty hands in that photo accompanying the article and that steaming pile in such a bad ass stance, is fucking hilarious.

 
 
 
Revillug
Freshman Guide
2  Revillug    3 months ago

He did, after all, send a mob to kill her.

I can't believe we are all witness to this sort of palace intrigue in modern America.

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Participates
2.1  arkpdx  replied to  Revillug @2    3 months ago
He did, after all, send a mob to kill her.

No he didn't.

[deleted]

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Junior Expert
2.1.1  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  arkpdx @2.1    3 months ago
No he didn't.

jrSmiley_91_smiley_image.gif  jrSmiley_86_smiley_image.gifjrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Participates
2.1.2  arkpdx  replied to  al Jizzerror @2.1.1    3 months ago

Do prove that he did. Have you ever listened to what he said at the rally before.the March to the capital.i did and he never says anything about commiting any type of violence 

Second the re wasn't a mob. There were American citizens protesting a grievance. Whether they were  right ir not is a separate issue . He did offer the use of other government resources to secure the capital before the march. Even you "queen" Hillary once said they Americans have the right to assemble and to protest. 

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
2.1.3  cjcold  replied to  arkpdx @2.1.2    3 months ago

Trump knew the mob was armed and told them to go "fight like hell".

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
2.1.4  bugsy  replied to  cjcold @2.1.3    3 months ago
told them to go "fight like hell".

Yes because we know in the loon world of liberalism, Trump was the only politician in the history of the world to tell their supporters to "fight like hell".

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Participates
2.1.5  arkpdx  replied to  cjcold @2.1.3    3 months ago
the mob was armed 

It was not a mob. It was protesters and marchers and being armed is also a right they have as Americans. 

It is also interesting that you seem to forget that the only victim of a firearm was an unarmed white protester shot  by a minority policeman. 

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
2.1.6  bugsy  replied to  arkpdx @2.1.5    3 months ago
that you seem to forget that the only victim of a firearm was an unarmed white protester shot  by a minority policeman.

Oh, he didn't forget it.

[deleted, comments about members are always off topic & no vale]

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.1.7  JohnRussell  replied to  arkpdx @2.1.5    3 months ago
It is also interesting that you seem to forget that the only victim of a firearm was an unarmed white protester shot  by a minority policeman. 

So, in your (confused) opinion, the cop shot Ashley Babbitt because she was white? Keep digging a hole, it is getting entertaining. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.1.8  JohnRussell  replied to  arkpdx @2.1.5    3 months ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
Professor Principal
2.1.9  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  arkpdx @2.1.5    3 months ago
It was not a mob. It was protesters and marchers and being armed is also a right they have as Americans. 

You can argue that there were people there to protest. You can say as Americans you can be armed. What you can't argue about is that the ones who broke into a government building (never mind it was the US Capital), destroy government property, and attack police officers, were not a mob. They were. It is indefensible.

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Participates
2.1.10  arkpdx  replied to  JohnRussell @2.1.7    3 months ago

I didn't say that now did I. Don't put words in my mouth please

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Participates
2.1.11  arkpdx  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @2.1.9    3 months ago

So you think that those in Portland during the BLM riots who attacked the federal building there and threw flammables into the building were a mob. How come those people were not tracked down using face recognition software. In fact even those that were arrested on the spot either had their charges lowered or dismissed all together can to tell me what the difference was?

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
2.1.12  bugsy  replied to  arkpdx @2.1.10    3 months ago
I didn't say that now did I.

No.....you didn't

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Junior Expert
2.1.13  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  cjcold @2.1.3    3 months ago

jrSmiley_13_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Junior Expert
2.1.14  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @2.1.9    3 months ago

jrSmiley_81_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Junior Expert
2.1.16  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  arkpdx @2.1.11    3 months ago
So you think that those in Portland during the BLM riots who attacked the federal building there and threw flammables into the building were a mob. How come those people were not tracked down

Nancy would have punched them out.

Oh, wait....  That bullshit was just a fucking irrelevant deflection.

Here's a little truth:

74 People Facing Federal Charges for Crimes Committed During Portland Demonstrations

Charges include assaulting federal officers, arson, failing to obey lawful orders, and damaging federal property
 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Junior Expert
2.1.17  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  arkpdx @2.1.2    3 months ago
Second the re wasn't a mob. There were American citizens protesting a grievance.

No, of course not, it wasn't a "mob"....

It was just a fucking peaceful protest where over 100 Capitol police officers hurt themselves.

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
Professor Principal
2.1.18  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  arkpdx @2.1.11    3 months ago
So you think that those in Portland during the BLM riots who attacked the federal building there and threw flammables into the building were a mob.

Yes I do.

 How come those people were not tracked down using face recognition software. In fact even those that were arrested on the spot either had their charges lowered or dismissed all together can to tell me what the difference was?

I think Al explained that above.

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Participates
2.1.19  arkpdx  replied to  al Jizzerror @2.1.16    3 months ago
74 People Facing Federal Charges For Crimes Committed During Portland Demonstrations 

And how many of those were tracked down and arrested by using facial recognition? 

91% of those arrested in Portland had their charges dropped 

https://www.koin.com/news/protests/policing-portlands-protests-1000-arrests-handful-of-prosecutions/ 

There were over 1000 charged for the Jan 6th root and as near as I can find none have had their charges dropped. 

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Participates
2.1.20  arkpdx  replied to  al Jizzerror @2.1.17    3 months ago
It was just a fucking peaceful protest where over 100 Capitol police officers hurt themselves.

No one ever said it was peaceful. There were almost 3times that number of federal officers hurt in Portland plus there was many local Leo's hurt in Portland on top of those 

https://www.kgw.com/article/news/politics/federal-officers-sustained-277-injuries-while-in-portland-including-temporary-blindness/283-c98ae76e-652c-4664-9693-68101ec8acf9 

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Junior Expert
2.1.21  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  arkpdx @2.1.20    3 months ago

I clicked on your link ( )

Portland's Leading Local News: Weather, Traffic, Sports and more | Portland, Oregon | KGW.com

404

The case of this missing page is still unsolved … but don't worry, we have our best investigative reporters tracking down leads.

Stay tuned…

Why is your source deep state fried?

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Junior Expert
2.1.22  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  arkpdx @2.1.20    3 months ago
There were almost 3times that number of federal officers hurt in Portland

I condemned the violence in Portland by some of the protestors.  They crossed a line. 

I also condemned the actions of Trump's secret police.  They attacked a very peaceful protestor (a Navy veteran) for no reason.

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Junior Expert
2.1.23  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  arkpdx @2.1.20    3 months ago
federal officers hurt in Portland

Is derailing my thread your new hobby?

The subject of this thread is NOT the fucking riots in Oregon.

Why don't you disparage Nancy Pelosi some more?

At least that stupid shit was on topic.

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Participates
2.1.24  arkpdx  replied to  al Jizzerror @2.1.22    3 months ago
I also condemned the actions of Trump's secret police. They attacked a very peaceful protestor (a Navy veteran) for no reason.

Do you also condemn the murder of an unarmed protester who was not a life threat to anyone my the capitol police?

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Junior Expert
2.1.25  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  arkpdx @2.1.24    3 months ago
Do you also condemn the murder of an unarmed protester

Yep.

She should NOT have been shot.

The cop should have put handcuffs on her and used her to block the broken window.

 
 
 
cobaltblue
Junior Participates
2.1.26  cobaltblue  replied to  bugsy @2.1.4    3 months ago
politician in the history of the world to tell their supporters to "fight like hell".

He's the only American politician to tell their supporters to 'fight like hell' against fellow Americans.

 
 
 
cobaltblue
Junior Participates
2.1.27  cobaltblue  replied to  arkpdx @2.1.24    3 months ago
unarmed protester who was not a life threat to anyone my the capitol police?

She was killed because the Trump's lie killed her. Trump's lie killed others. The entire debacle was a function of the Traitor-in-Chief's election lie. He's a liar,  he knew he lost the election, and his ego did him (and the entire Republican party) in. He could have had some kind of legacy had he completed a peaceful transition of power. He fucked himself. And his family for generations. The Trump name is forever ruined. His ego came first. He's a narcissist that knows no boundaries. It's about him and only him. He'll throw his kids under the bus. I feel the worst for Baron. He now knows his mom did girl-on-girl porn, knows his dad is a consummate loser, and has to see his coke-ridden half-brother make a fool of himself on video. 

Pelosi is totally a bad ass. She recognizes trump for what he is. A Mussolini wannabe. Maybe the traitor trump should have checked to see how it turned out for Mussolini. 

 
 
 
afrayedknot
Sophomore Quiet
2.1.28  afrayedknot  replied to  arkpdx @2.1.24    3 months ago

“…who was not a life threat to anyone my the capitol police?”

While the loss of life was tragic…being on site (in storming the Capitol no less) led those in charge of protecting our processes in an improbable, inconceivable situation. 

To dismiss the facts are to dismiss the threat, which is to dismiss the intent, which is to to dismiss the provocation that came from on high.

And that is the true tragedy, that she died in defending the indefensible. 

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Junior Expert
2.1.29  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  cobaltblue @2.1.27    3 months ago
the traitor trump should have checked to see how it turned out for Mussolini. 

jrSmiley_81_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Participates
2.1.30  arkpdx  replied to  cobaltblue @2.1.27    3 months ago
She was killed because the Trump's lie killed 

Really? Since when has someone else's actions deserve a death sentence? When did breaking a window become a capital offense? 

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Participates
2.1.31  arkpdx  replied to  afrayedknot @2.1.28    3 months ago

What threat? 

 
 
 
afrayedknot
Sophomore Quiet
2.1.32  afrayedknot  replied to  arkpdx @2.1.31    3 months ago

“What threat? “

Please. 

When the election was lost and when the loser refuses to accept the will of the people, and when that loser incites the sycophants to ignore the reality of the loss in an attempt to subvert the entire process, that is not somehow a threat? 

Again, please…

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
2.1.33  Trout Giggles  replied to  afrayedknot @2.1.32    3 months ago

Is a the threat of a hanging free speech?

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Junior Expert
2.1.34  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  Trout Giggles @2.1.33    3 months ago
Is a the threat of a hanging free speech?

HANG MIKE PENCE!

Trump said that's "common sense".

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Participates
2.1.35  arkpdx  replied to  afrayedknot @2.1.32    3 months ago
When the election was lost and when the loser refuses to accept the will of the people

Like Clinton in 2016 or Gore in 2000 

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Junior Expert
2.1.37  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  arkpdx @2.1.35    3 months ago
Clinton in 2016 or Gore in 2000 

Did either say the election was "stolen"?

In 2000 the Florida State Supreme Court Mandated a recount in Florida.

Butt a 5-4 partisan Republican ruling in SCOTUS stopped the recount that could have accurately determined the will of the people.  

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Participates
2.1.38  arkpdx  replied to  al Jizzerror @2.1.37    3 months ago
In 2000 the Florida State Supreme Court Mandated a recount in Florida.

Of course that was found to to break Florida election laws and also constituted the Florida supreme court trying to enact new law which also violated Florida law. 

stopped the recount that could have accurately determined the will of the people.  

Several counts conducted by news sources bit for and against bush and using methods that included the ones that the Gore campaign pushed for found there was no change in the outcome so the will of the people was determined. 

Butt a 5-4 partisan Republican ruling in SCOTUS stopped the recount 

I sure you would think a  vote that allowed the recount to continue would have been nonpartisan and OK. 

 

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Junior Expert
2.1.39  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  arkpdx @2.1.38    3 months ago
Of course that was found to to break Florida election laws and also constituted the Florida supreme court trying to enact new law which also violated Florida law.

Bullshit.

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Participates
2.1.40  arkpdx  replied to  al Jizzerror @2.1.39    3 months ago

So do cows and horses. That does not refute what I said

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.1.41  devangelical  replied to  afrayedknot @2.1.28    3 months ago
she died in defending the indefensible

meh, lots of trumpsters are going down that road........ too bad...

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.1.42  devangelical  replied to  cobaltblue @2.1.27    3 months ago
A Mussolini wannabe

wussolini?

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
2.1.43  Tessylo  replied to  al Jizzerror @2.1.37    3 months ago

Some folks have irreversible deflection syndrome on top of Clinton Derangement Syndrome.

Sad

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
2.1.44  Tessylo  replied to  devangelical @2.1.41    3 months ago

No less whatsoever

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
2.1.45  Tessylo  replied to  Tessylo @2.1.44    3 months ago

I meant to say no loss

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
2.1.46  cjcold  replied to  bugsy @2.1.6    3 months ago

She had it coming. The rest backed off as a result

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
3  Kavika     3 months ago

Trump the Snowflake AKA Thunder Mouth wouldn't last a round with Pelosi.

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Junior Expert
3.1  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  Kavika @3    3 months ago

jrSmiley_13_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
4  Kavika     3 months ago

Watching the tape of Pelosi behind the scenes showed how tough that lady is and what cowards the fucking republicans were and how the SOB lied and now the world after seeing the video knows what POS they are.

 

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Participates
4.1  arkpdx  replied to  Kavika @4    3 months ago
Watching the tape of Pelosi behind the scenes showed how tough that lady 

Who was hiding in a basement when she said that. How brave is that? Easy to look brave when one is not under direct threat 

now the world after seeing the video knows what POS they are

[deleted]

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
4.1.1  Kavika   replied to  arkpdx @4.1    3 months ago
Who was hiding in a basement when she said that. How brave is that? Easy to look brave when one is not under direct threat 

You mean all the republicans hiding and running many of them in the basement as well...

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Participates
4.1.2  arkpdx  replied to  Kavika @4.1.1    3 months ago

No one called them brave or tough

[deleted]

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Junior Expert
4.1.3  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  Kavika @4.1.1    3 months ago
You mean all the republicans hiding and running

Yep.  Trumpanzees are fucking pussies

Josh "The Coward" Hawley egged the mob on.

Then he ran away "like a little bitch".

Look at his girly "raised fist".  

He doesn't even know how to make a fist (the index finger should be in line with the other fingers).

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Junior Expert
4.1.4  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  arkpdx @4.1    3 months ago
Who was hiding in a basement when she said that. How brave is that?

Are you trying to say Nancy was a coward because she didn't fight Trump's terrorists single handedly?

She had to do the president's job.  Nancy (and Schumer) called the Maryland & Virginia Governors and requested state troopers and their National Guards.  They even called the fucking DoD for help.  Nancy and Chuck demonstrated REAL leadership.

Trump wanted to join the insurrectionists.  Trump even wanted them to hang Mike Pence.  Trump is a fucking REAL criminal.

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Participates
4.1.5  arkpdx  replied to  al Jizzerror @4.1.4    3 months ago
Trump wanted to join the insurrectionists.

Of course he may have wanted to go there to calm the crowd and to end the violence. You can't prove he didnt

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Participates
4.1.6  arkpdx  replied to  al Jizzerror @4.1.4    3 months ago
Are you trying to say Nancy was a coward because she didn't fight Trump's terrorists single handedly?

Never said that. I said she did not show toughness nor did she show bravery. 

Please don't put words in my mouth or project you own feeling into me. 

 
 
 
Gsquared
Senior Expert
4.1.7  Gsquared  replied to  arkpdx @4.1.6    3 months ago

That is the most hypocritical comment ever.  We could cite dozens of instances where you make up things you claim people said, and then attack them for it.  It's habitual with you.

Unlike what you do constantly, Al didn't "put" any words in your mouth.  He merely raised a question.

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Junior Expert
4.1.8  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  arkpdx @4.1.5    3 months ago
Of course he may have wanted to go there to calm the crowd and to end the violence.

jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

Trump tried to "calm the crowd" by pouring gasoline on the fire with this tweet:

512

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Junior Expert
4.1.9  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  arkpdx @4.1    3 months ago
Easy to look brave when one is not under direct threat

It's also easy to look brave when one is courageously typing stupid comments online too.

512

 
 
 
cobaltblue
Junior Participates
4.1.10  cobaltblue  replied to  arkpdx @4.1    3 months ago
Who was hiding in a basement when she said that

Your pussy ex-president hid in a bunker during a peaceful protest. Fuckin' hilarious!!

How to Bunker

 
 
 
cobaltblue
Junior Participates
4.1.11  cobaltblue  replied to  arkpdx @4.1.6    3 months ago
Please don't put words in my mouth or project you own feeling into me. 

Aw jeez. C'mon arkie. Not again. 

 
 
 
cobaltblue
Junior Participates
4.1.12  cobaltblue  replied to  arkpdx @4.1.5    3 months ago
You can't prove he didnt

And you can't prove he did. Maybe Traitor Trump wanted to clean the shit the insurrectionists left behind in the Capitol. They. Shit. In. The. Capitol. Because the weak ex-president lied about an election he knew he lost. 

Trump loves his supporters' ignorance. He depends on it. He cashes in on it. He takes advantage of their stupidity. Howard Stern said it best:

Stern said: "The oddity in all of this is the people Trump despises most, love him the most.

"The people who are voting for Trump for the most part... he wouldn't even let them in a f***ing hotel.

"He'd be disgusted by them. Go to Mar-a-Lago, see if there's any people who look like you," he said. "I'm talking to you in the audience."

"The Trump voter who idolizes the guy, he despises you."

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
4.1.14  Trout Giggles  replied to  al Jizzerror @4.1.3    3 months ago

"run joshie...run!"

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Junior Expert
4.1.15  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  cobaltblue @4.1.12    3 months ago

jrSmiley_93_smiley_image.jpg

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Junior Expert
4.1.16  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  Trout Giggles @4.1.14    3 months ago
"run joshie...run!"

Yeah.  He may remind you of Forrest Gump, butt Forrest Gump was NOT a fucking coward like Hawley.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
4.1.17  Trout Giggles  replied to  al Jizzerror @4.1.16    3 months ago

You got that right

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Participates
4.1.18  arkpdx  replied to  Gsquared @4.1.7    3 months ago

And yet what asked you can not provide even one example. 

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Junior Expert
4.1.19  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  arkpdx @4.1.18    3 months ago

Gsquared said ( 4.1.7 )

"We could cite dozens of instances where you make up things you claim people said, and then attack them for it.  It's habitual with you."

You said ( 4.1.18 ):

" And yet what asked you can not provide even one example ."

Nice gibberish>

Here is one example (there are MANY more):

 
crop=auto
Professor Guide
3.1   pending   Thrawn 31   replied to  JohnRussell @ 3     2 days ago

Pretty much, I would vote for damn near anyone but Trump because I know exactly what Trump wants. Fuck that outcome. 

    REPLY
 
 
_v=63f541501341496
Professor Participates
3.1.1   arkpdx   replied to  Thrawn 31 @ 3.1     2 days ago
Fuck that outcome. 

Yup! It's wrong to make America great. Being energy independent and a net exporter of energy is wrong. Securing our southern border and deporting illegal aliens is wrong. Keeping inflation low is bad. Inflation should be closing in on 9%on even higher. Making American interests come first in treaty negotiations is a bad thing. Making other countries pay their fair and negotiated share to defend them should not be tolerated.

What other things did you not like?

I do suppose you like the rising crime rates and the high gas prices and the high inflation rates and the porous border and the huge amount of deadly illegal drugs coming across the border. 

All Thrawn said was " Fuck that outcome."  Thrawn never said  any of that other shit!  You put PARAGRAPHS in his mouth.  You made that shit up and ridiculed him for it!

Gsquared said ( 4.1.7 )

"We could cite dozens of instances where you make up things you claim people said, and then attack them for it.  It's habitual with you."

You said " you can not provide even one example ."

I took the liberty of providing the example above.  You can thank me later.

Game set and match to Gsquared.

Gsquared just won the INTERNET!

512

This award has been metafied for your entertainment.

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Participates
4.1.20  arkpdx  replied to  al Jizzerror @4.1.19    3 months ago
Game set and match to Gsquared.

Gsquared just won the INTERNET!

Wrong again buckoo!

Show me where I said that thrawn said any of that.  He said 

Fuck that outcome. 

All I did was provide things that the outcome he seems to dislike may provide going by what was done in the past. Show me what words did did I put in his mouth. 

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Junior Expert
4.1.21  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  arkpdx @4.1.20    3 months ago
All I did was provide things

Yeah, the shit you tried to put in his mouth.

Show me what words did did I put in his mouth. 

4.1.19

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Participates
4.1.22  arkpdx  replied to  al Jizzerror @4.1.21    3 months ago

And still you cannot cite what words I put in his mouth just because you  say it does not make it so. 

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
4.1.23  devangelical  replied to  cobaltblue @4.1.10    3 months ago

please ignore the stroked out trumpster shit puddles...

 
 
 
Gsquared
Senior Expert
4.1.24  Gsquared  replied to  arkpdx @4.1.18    3 months ago
And yet what asked you can not provide even one example. 

Whatever that means.   But since you didn't ask before, and appear to be attempting to ask for an example now, here is a real beauty:

14.2     mocowgirl     replied to    arkpdx   @ 14:

The human baby in the womb has the right to life as endowed by it's Creater (GOD).

So now you are going to force your religious beliefs on women?

The Jewish religion's GOD allows abortion.  Many sects of Christianity's GOD allow abortion.  

Do you worship a different GOD or is your sect at war with the Jews and other sects of Christianity in trying to gain control of the US government and therefore our citizens and our military?

How is your sect any different than the Taliban in Afghanistan or the Ayatollah in Iran?

I am not sure the world is going to be pleased to have your religious sect in charge of our government and our nukes.

14.2.9     arkpdx     replied to    mocowgirl   @ 14.2  

  So that must mean you are Ok with honor killings and killing for being a heretic.

 

 
 
 
Gsquared
Senior Expert
4.1.25  Gsquared  replied to  al Jizzerror @4.1.19    3 months ago
Game set and match to Gsquared.
Gsquared just won the INTERNET!

Thank you.  Thank you very much!

256

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
4.1.26  devangelical  replied to  Gsquared @4.1.25    3 months ago

people-animated-gif.gif

 
 
 
Gsquared
Senior Expert
4.1.27  Gsquared  replied to  devangelical @4.1.26    3 months ago

Ha!

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Junior Expert
4.1.28  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  Gsquared @4.1.24    3 months ago

jrSmiley_100_smiley_image.jpg

 
 
 
cobaltblue
Junior Participates
4.1.29  cobaltblue  replied to  al Jizzerror @4.1.19    3 months ago
All Thrawn said was " Fuck that outcome."  Thrawn never said  any of that other shit!  You put PARAGRAPHS in his mouth.  You made that shit up and ridiculed him for it!

Gsquared said ( 4.1.7 )

"We could cite dozens of instances where you make up things you claim people said, and then attack them for it.  It's habitual with you."

You said " you can not provide even one example ."

I took the liberty of providing the example above.  You can thank me later.

Game set and match to Gsquared.

Gsquared just won the INTERNET!

WOOHOO! Gsquared ROCKS!!

theatermove.gif

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
4.1.30  Kavika   replied to  Gsquared @4.1.24    3 months ago

Oh-Yes--meme-48259.jpg

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Participates
4.1.31  arkpdx  replied to  cobaltblue @4.1.29    3 months ago

[Deleted]

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
4.1.32  Tessylo  replied to  arkpdx @4.1.5    3 months ago
"Trump wanted to join the insurrectionists."
"Of course he may have wanted to go there to calm the crowd and to end the violence. You can't prove he didnt"

Clueless is no way to go through life son,

He's the one who incited and stirred them up for months in the first place AFTER HE LOST AND HE IS STILL CLAIMING THE ELECTION WAS STOLEN FROM HIM AND THERE ARE WHACKJOBS OUT THERE THAT BELIEVE HIM

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Participates
4.1.33  arkpdx  replied to  Tessylo @4.1.32    3 months ago
THERE THAT BELIEVE HIM 

And there are still those on the left that believe that the 2000 election was stolen from Gore even after 22 years and there are those that believe Hillary's election was stolen in 2016. There were even those that that rioted for weeks in various cities in the US and caused much more damage than those on Jan 6 even thought of. 

 
 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
4.1.34  Tessylo  replied to  arkpdx @4.1.33    3 months ago

Funny arkie how you're the only one bringing up Gore after 22 years, and Hillary.  And the riots.

All you have is deflection.  Projection.  Denial.

Fucking tiresome.  

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Junior Expert
4.1.35  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  arkpdx @4.1.22    3 months ago
And still you cannot cite what words I put in his mouth just because you  say it does not make it so.

And yet YOU said I "put words in your mouth" when I asked you a simple question:

4.1.4   author   al Jizzerror   replied to  arkpdx @ 4.1     5 days ago
Who was hiding in a basement when she said that. How brave is that?

Are you trying to say Nancy was a coward because she didn't fight Trump's terrorists single handedly?

She had to do the president's job.  Nancy (and Schumer) called the Maryland & Virginia Governors and requested state troopers and their National Guards.  They even called the fucking DoD for help.  Nancy and Chuck demonstrated REAL leadership.

Trump wanted to join the insurrectionists.  Trump even wanted them to hang Mike Pence.  Trump is a fucking REAL criminal.

My comment starts with a quotation of exactly what you said.

Then I asked you a question.  Then I characterized what Nancy was doing while Trump watched his insurrection on TV.

Here is YOUR fucking reply:

 

4.1.6   arkpdx   replied to  al Jizzerror @ 4.1.4     5 days ago
Are you trying to say Nancy was a coward because she didn't fight Trump's terrorists single handedly?

Never said that. I said she did not show toughness nor did she show bravery. 

Please don't put words in my mouth or project you own feeling into me. 

Obviously, I did not attribute my question to your mouth.

Please tell us all about how Trump courageously rooted for his insurrectionists while hiding in the White House (with Secret Service protection) ignoring the pleas from his staff, family members, and Fox Noise sycophants begging him to call off the insurrection.

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Participates
4.1.36  arkpdx  replied to  al Jizzerror @4.1.35    3 months ago

So show me where I said Nancy was a coward. 

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Junior Expert
4.1.37  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  arkpdx @4.1.36    3 months ago
So show me where I said Nancy was a coward.

This dance is boring.

Please stop hitting on me.

For the last time; I simply asked a question (4.1.4):

"Are you trying to say Nancy was a coward because she didn't fight Trump's terrorists single handedly?"

You could have just said,  "No."

Butt you decided to whine, so you replied (4.1.6):

"Please don't put words in my mouth or project you own feeling into me."

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
4.1.38  devangelical  replied to  al Jizzerror @4.1.37    3 months ago

please flag all off topic, taunting, and trolling comments...

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
4.1.39  devangelical  replied to  devangelical @4.1.38    3 months ago

please, please, please...

 
 
 
magicschoolbusdropout
Sophomore Principal
4.1.40  magicschoolbusdropout  replied to  devangelical @4.1.38    3 months ago
please flag all off topic, taunting, and trolling comments...

[deleted]

Al Does fine on his Own.

 
 
 
magicschoolbusdropout
Sophomore Principal
4.1.41  magicschoolbusdropout  replied to  magicschoolbusdropout @4.1.40    3 months ago

Meta [devangelical] 

[deleted]

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Participates
4.1.42  arkpdx  replied to  al Jizzerror @4.1.37    3 months ago

I did that because I never said Nancy was a coward. You said that I did. 

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Participates
4.1.43  arkpdx  replied to  magicschoolbusdropout @4.1.40    3 months ago

Devangelical likes to ticket [deleted]

 
 
 
magicschoolbusdropout
Sophomore Principal
4.1.44  magicschoolbusdropout  replied to  arkpdx @4.1.43    3 months ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
magicschoolbusdropout
Sophomore Principal
4.1.45  magicschoolbusdropout  replied to  magicschoolbusdropout @4.1.41    3 months ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Expert
4.1.46  Sean Treacy  replied to  devangelical @4.1.38    3 months ago

please flag all off topic, taunting, and trolling comments.

[deleted]

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
4.1.47  bugsy  replied to  arkpdx @4.1.43    3 months ago

 [deleted]

 
 
 
magicschoolbusdropout
Sophomore Principal
4.1.48  magicschoolbusdropout  replied to  magicschoolbusdropout @4.1.44    3 months ago

[deleted]

[THUMBS UP !]

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Junior Expert
4.1.49  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  devangelical @4.1.38    3 months ago

Sorry.

I have never flagged anything on NewStalkers.

I prefer to let stalker/trolls exhibit their stupidity for everyone to see.

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Junior Expert
4.1.50  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  arkpdx @4.1.42    3 months ago
I never said Nancy was a coward. You said that I did.

I did NOT say you said Nancy was a coward.  I asked a question and I included a quotation of what you said.

Your reading comprehension is zero.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
4.2  Tessylo  replied to  Kavika @4    3 months ago

One of the leading inciters/instigators, Hawley, ran like the little bitch that he is, sprinted actually

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5  JohnRussell    3 months ago

Nancy Pelosi's time is running out, more literally than figuratively. She is 82 1/2 years old right now. If the Republicans retake the House this year and she loses the speakership, she would be almost 85 before the next chance she would have to be speaker again.  I'm not sure she wants to stay in Congress at her age as a minority leader.

The only thing I regret about her getting in Trumps face is that she didnt do it a lot more. 

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Junior Expert
5.1  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  JohnRussell @5    3 months ago
The only thing I regret about her getting in Trumps face is that she didnt do it a lot more. 

Are you talking about Nancy "The Ripper"?

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
6  bugsy    3 months ago

Funny how "coincidentally" Nancy had a camera crew tag along with her the entirety of the riot, when she was playing the part of the "badass".

Almost certainly would have been cowarding in some other locked room away from everything if the camera crew was not there.

 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Guide
6.1  1stwarrior  replied to  bugsy @6    3 months ago

No, that was her training partner's job - AOC.

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Junior Expert
6.1.1  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  1stwarrior @6.1    3 months ago
AOC

This thread is supposed to be about Nancy Pelosi.

Please stop derailing this thread.

512 .

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
Professor Principal
6.2  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  bugsy @6    3 months ago

That was her daughter who is a documentarian who was there and was invited to be there, long before anyone thought there was going to be an intersection. 

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
6.2.1  bugsy  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @6.2    3 months ago

Then that makes it even more sketchy.

It has been well reported by reputable sources that the Capitol police, and by default, Nancy Pelosi, knew there was going to be large crowds expected on Jan 6, many of them from far right wing groups, and they were warned that there may be violence.

Still only a "coincidence"?

No one in their right mind thinks so.

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Expert
6.2.2  MrFrost  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @6.2    3 months ago

That was her daughter who is a documentarian who was there and was invited to be there, long before anyone thought there was going to be an intersection. 

Yep, exactly. 

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Expert
6.2.3  MrFrost  replied to  bugsy @6.2.1    3 months ago
from far right wing groups, and they were warned that there may be violence.

Thanks for admitting it. 

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Junior Expert
6.2.4  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  bugsy @6.2.1    3 months ago
Still only a "coincidence"? No one in their right mind thinks so.

A "coincidence"?

Fuck no.

You have fucking proved that Nancy Pelosi's daughter staged the whole insurrection to make her mom look tough.

/S

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
6.2.5  Tessylo  replied to  bugsy @6.2.1    3 months ago

Must be some deep state conspiracy right bugsy?

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Junior Expert
6.3  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  bugsy @6    3 months ago
Funny how "coincidentally" Nancy had a camera crew tag

It was her daughter who does documentaries that recorded Nancy (and Schumer). 

Everyone knew the shit would hit the fan on Jan 6th.

Bannon said buckle up on Jan 5th.

Trump tweeted this about two weeks before Jan 6th:

512

"Be there, will be wild!"

Trump made sure the media would be there (as usual).

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
6.3.1  Tessylo  replied to  al Jizzerror @6.3    3 months ago

Some of the fucking moron white Reich wing scum 'protesters' jrSmiley_80_smiley_image.gif who were there that day had t-shirts on with the date of their trumpturd incited failed coup on them.

I'm sure that was a coincidence.

Right bugsy?

 
 
 
cobaltblue
Junior Participates
6.3.2  cobaltblue  replied to  Tessylo @6.3.1    3 months ago
Right bugsy?

What some unnamed right wing conspiracy nuts think about daily:

f3afbaecdf33512a78b1bb845eab52e9.jpg

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Junior Expert
6.3.3  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  Tessylo @6.3.1    3 months ago
Some of the fucking moron white Reich wing scum 'protesters' who were there that day had t-shirts on with the date of their trumpturd incited failed coup on them.

Yeah.

Civil War was their fucking plan!

512

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Expert
6.4  MrFrost  replied to  bugsy @6    3 months ago
Funny how "coincidentally" Nancy had a camera crew tag along with her the entirety of the riot, when she was playing the part of the "badass".

Her daughter writes documentaries and is a member of the press. I find it comical that the same people that refuse to watch ANY of the Jan. 6th hearings, (or believe any of it), suddenly find this newsworthy, like Pelosi organized the whole fucking thing. Absolutely laughable.  

 
 
 
Gsquared
Senior Expert
6.4.1  Gsquared  replied to  MrFrost @6.4    3 months ago

Congress had convened to confirm the electoral votes for the 46th President, and it's supposed to be some kind of weird conspiracy that there was someone there to make a documentary.  Too fucking ridiculous.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
6.4.2  JohnRussell  replied to  MrFrost @6.4    3 months ago

A lot of these right wingers have foot in mouth disease. No help for it. 

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Expert
6.4.3  MrFrost  replied to  Gsquared @6.4.1    3 months ago

Congress had convened to confirm the electoral votes for the 46th President, and it's supposed to be some kind of weird conspiracy that there was someone there to make a documentary.  Too fucking ridiculous.

Exactly. 

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Participates
6.4.4  arkpdx  replied to  JohnRussell @6.4.2    3 months ago
 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Junior Expert
6.4.5  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  arkpdx @6.4.4    3 months ago
Biden isn't right wing

jrSmiley_81_smiley_image.gif

Please stop derailing this thread.

This thread is about Nancy Pelosi, not Biden.

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Participates
6.4.6  arkpdx  replied to  al Jizzerror @6.4.5    3 months ago

I didn't bring up right wing people with their foot in their mouth ( a comment that is equally derailing but perfectly fine with you). I was just looking for clarification. 

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Junior Expert
6.4.7  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  arkpdx @6.4.6    3 months ago
I was just looking for clarification.

Oh, sorry, my bad....

Did you find "clarification"?

NO? 

Well that stinks!

512

 
 
 
cobaltblue
Junior Participates
6.5  cobaltblue  replied to  bugsy @6    3 months ago
Nancy had a camera crew tag along with her the entirety of the riot,

Jesus fuckin' christ, bugsy. Cell phones have cameras. Everyone has a cell phone = everyone has a camera at the ready. Your excuses for your ex-president are pathetic and ... dare I say it? ... sad. 

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
6.5.1  devangelical  replied to  cobaltblue @6.5    3 months ago

oh no, another conspiracy...

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
6.5.2  Trout Giggles  replied to  devangelical @6.5.1    3 months ago

You know Cobalt is at her wit's end when she says JFC

 
 
 
cobaltblue
Junior Participates
6.5.3  cobaltblue  replied to  devangelical @6.5.1    3 months ago
oh no, another conspiracy...

What the fuck is up with all this fuckin' weird conspiracy shit constantly being thrown up? Get over it, people. Tell 'em, dev.

Trump's a liar. Trump's a traitor. Trump's a grifter. Trump laughs at his supporters behind their backs. Trump's an incest wannabe. Lesson over. No conspiracies. Facts.  

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Participates
6.5.4  arkpdx  replied to  cobaltblue @6.5.3    3 months ago

Here is the most important thing..

Trump is not president anymore! Trump is not running for any office! The only thing the constant harping about Trump that the Democrats are doing is that they are attempt to oke screen all their inadequacies at solving any of the real problems facing the country. Here a clue for you all, it's not working. Every one can see that your candidates have no solutions. Your going to lose big on November 8th. 

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
6.5.5  Tessylo  replied to  arkpdx @6.5.4    3 months ago
"Trump is not president anymore! Trump is not running for any office!"

Clueless is no way to go through life son.

Who is claiming that the election was stolen from him still almost two years now?

Who is running again in 2024?

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Participates
6.5.6  arkpdx  replied to  Tessylo @6.5.5    3 months ago
Who is running again in 2024?

I let you know in 2024. I don't have the ability to see into the future. 

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
6.5.7  devangelical  replied to  arkpdx @6.5.6    3 months ago

as if...

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
6.5.8  Tessylo  replied to  arkpdx @6.5.6    3 months ago

the trumpturd has been grifting on that for many years now - the turd claims he is running in 2024 and is going to MTG as his VP.

jrSmiley_86_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Junior Expert
6.5.9  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  arkpdx @6.5.4    3 months ago
Trump is not president anymore!

Neither is Hunter Biden.

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Participates
6.5.10  arkpdx  replied to  al Jizzerror @6.5.9    3 months ago

His father is and he is deeply involved in influence pedalling

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Junior Expert
6.5.11  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  arkpdx @6.5.10    3 months ago

Bullshit.

Reminder:  This thread is supposed to be about Nancy Pelosi vs. The Donald.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
7  Jeremy Retired in NC    3 months ago
"I want him to come. I want to punch him out!"

her drunken ass could barely stand let alone throw a punch.

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
7.1  Kavika   replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @7    3 months ago

She could be drunk as hell and still not miss hitting Thunder Mouth with an ass two ax handles wide.

512

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Junior Expert
7.1.1  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  Kavika @7.1    3 months ago
hitting Thunder Mouth with an ass two ax handles wide.

Miss Lindsey loves hitting Trump's ass.

512

 
 
 
Revillug
Freshman Guide
7.1.2  Revillug  replied to  al Jizzerror @7.1.1    3 months ago
Miss Lindsey

Slurs based on one's sexuality are a bad habit.

I support the right of someone, even a cowardly GOP Senator, to keep their sexuality a secret.

 
 
 
cobaltblue
Junior Participates
7.2  cobaltblue  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @7    3 months ago

her drunken ass could barely stand let alone throw a punch.

You're confusing her with Giuliani.
 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
7.2.1  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  cobaltblue @7.2    3 months ago

Yeah, no.  

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Junior Expert
7.2.2  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  cobaltblue @7.2    3 months ago
You're confusing her with Giuliani.

jrSmiley_100_smiley_image.jpg

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
7.2.3  Kavika   replied to  cobaltblue @7.2    3 months ago

Hands in Pants Giuliani is the one with the runny makeup.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
7.2.4  Tessylo  replied to  cobaltblue @7.2    3 months ago

jrSmiley_93_smiley_image.jpg

Plus

jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
8  Ronin2    3 months ago

Nancy is a badass? Not even after drinking her winery dry would she have the courage or moral integrity to follow through. 

Trump's lard ass is not some piece of paper the Queen Bitch can simply tear in two. Thank God Trump's speech writers kept it short 2 or 3 pages. They know Trump can bloviate to fill in the gaps. If the speech were one of Obama's or Bill Clinton's she would never have been able to do it. She would have to delegate to one of her disciples- probably bobble head boy Schiff. Might be easier to have him lose the papers rather than tear them. Has he ever found the damning evidence he supposedly has on Trump? 

Hitting Trump's lard ass is not  as easy as getting as an impeachment through a Democrat dominated House that is devoid of evidence, facts, and ethics. Nor is at simple as assigning two TDS driven former Republican morons to the Jan 6th committee over the protest of Republicans- while not seating 2 of their nominated delegates in defiance of House rules. 

The bones in Nancy's thin, frail wrist and hands would snap no matter what area of Trump she hit. Being inebriated 24/7 she might not feel it until one of the agents arresting her pointed it out. She would either faint; or break her other wrist hitting the agent or Trump again.

They wouldn't take her to jail; but straight to a hospital to detox. A fate worse than death for Nancy. It would take forever for her to get her raspy drunken slur right again. People might actually accuse her of being sober!

Nancy wouldn't commit a crime that she actually couldn't get out of. This isn't simple insider trading; or using her position to get a well paying job for one of her children or grand children. There would be real witnesses to an actual physical crime. No way to bribe or intimidate all of the agents or anyone else around that witnessed it. No matter how big of a hissy fit she throws she would have to go to trial.  

Trump would sue her ass. Doesn't matter if Nancy hurt herself far more hitting Trump- he would still sue her ass. She could refuse to pay; but Nancy can't be separated from her alcohol- so no prison time! Nancy might have a heart attack paying Trump.

Nancy wouldn't get any sympathy. Outside of her little cult following, the Queen Bitch is easily as hated as Trump. People would be cheering her on to break the rest of her bones. 

She should stick with what she knows. Drinking; being a first rate bitch; and making sure bills that might force her or her husband to actually use their alcohol addled minds to earn money never see light of day.

As recently as December, Pelosi still opposed a trading ban altogether. “We’re a free-market economy,” she said, Representatives “should be able to participate in that.” A month later, when asked whether he supported a stock trading ban, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., ducked . “I don't own any stocks, and I think that's the right thing to do,” he told reporters — a laudable position, but hardly a committal one.

Pelosi and Schumer quickly reversed course, but their handling of the issue has been curious, to say the least. Usually in Washington, when there’s a choice between a bill with just Democratic support and a bill supported by members of both parties, Democratic leaders will opt for the latter. On this issue, Pelosi and Schumer could have thrown their weight behind several bipartisan bills, such as one from Roy and Rep. Abigail Spanberger, D-Va., or another from Sens. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., and Steve Daines, R-Mont .

Instead, in February, Pelosi asked  her close ally Rep. Zoe Lofgren , D-Calif., to  draft her own bill . At the time, the speaker predicted the bill’s text would be released “pretty soon,” but Lofgren released her proposal only last week. Pelosi’s move  angered Republicans like Roy  and even miffed Democrats, with Spanberger saying she was  “ghosted” by Democratic leadership .

Schumer, meanwhile, tapped Sen. Jeff Merkley, D-Ore., to lead a working group to reach a consensus on a new plan from several being floated in the Senate. Though Merkley and many other members support a ban, the working group has moved as speedily as any working group does — which is to say we still don’t have its proposal. So, unlike in 2012, when Obama signed the STOCK Act less than three months after he called for its passage , Democrats have wasted almost a year dawdling.

Worse, Lofgren’s bill has its flaws. For example, Walter Shaub, a former director of the U.S. Office of Government Ethics, writes that the bill would create a category of blind trusts that is less strictly controlled than current regulations — “fake blind trusts, like the one former President Donald Trump invented for himself in 2017.”

Good old Nancy. She says all of the right things in front of the camera; but never follows through.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
8.1  Tessylo  replied to  Ronin2 @8    3 months ago

WTF are you ranting and rambling about???????

Your deflection and Clinton derangement syndrome are so fucking tiresome

 
 
 
cobaltblue
Junior Participates
8.1.1  cobaltblue  replied to  Tessylo @8.1    3 months ago
deflection and Clinton derangement syndrome are so fucking tiresome

Omigawd, Tessylo! I'm laughing so hard at the idiocy offered by some!!! I'm dyin' over here! Damn, girl, there are some people who really do have assholes that are insanely jealous of the shit that comes out of their mouths. 

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
8.1.2  Tessylo  replied to  cobaltblue @8.1.1    3 months ago
"Damn, girl, there are some people who really do have assholes that are insanely jealous of the shit that comes out of their mouths. "

I'm laughing so hard at my new favorite expression.  

 
 
 
cobaltblue
Junior Participates
8.2  cobaltblue  replied to  Ronin2 @8    3 months ago
She says all of the right things in front of the camera; but never follows through.

Like trump and his tax records? 

  • Trump: “I’m being audited … so I can’t.” (See next section.) (Repeatedly since  February )
  • Trump: “There’s nothing to learn from them.” (Fact-checkers say this is  false .) ( February February May May January )
  • Trump: “Mitt Romney looked like a fool when he delayed and delayed and delayed and … didn’t file until a month and a half before the election and it cost him big league.” ( February July )
  • Trump: His tax rate is “none of your business.” ( May )
  • Trump: “I don’t think anybody cares.” (Polls show this is   false .) ( May,   September )
  • Trump: “You will learn more about Donald Trump” by looking at his financial disclosure forms than by looking at tax returns. (Fact-checkers say this is   false .) ( September )
  • Trump: Blames Clinton for fact he doesn’t pay taxes: “A lot of my write-off was depreciation, and that, Hillary as a senator, allowed. The people that give her all this money want it.” (As a senator, Clinton did   vote to close   tax loopholes — including one Trump may have used to pay   no federal income taxes .) ( October )
  • Trump: “The only ones that care about my tax returns are the reporters.” (Roughly   74 percent of Americans , including 53 percent of Republicans, say Trump should make his tax returns public, according to a Washington Post-ABC poll in January.) ( January )

****

  • 2011 : Said he would release tax returns after President Obama released his long-form birth certificate
  • 2014 : Said he would “absolutely” release returns “if I decide to run for office.”
  • 2015 : “I would release tax returns. … Nobody knows the tax return world better than me.”
  • 2015 : Said he would release tax returns when “we find out the true story on Hillary’s emails.”
  • January 2016 : Said he was ready to disclose his “very big … very beautiful” returns.
  • February  2016 : Said he would release returns “probably over the next few months.”
  • February 2016 : “I will absolutely give my return, but I’m being audited now for two or three [years’ worth] now so I can’t.”
  • February 2016 : Responding to claims he has a “bombshell” in his taxes,” Trump said: “We’ll make a determination over the next couple of months. It’s very complicated.”
  • May 2016 : Said he fights “very hard to pay as little tax as possible.”
  • May 2016 : Will “release my tax returns when audit is complete, not after election!”
  • July : Manafort: “Mr. Trump has said that his taxes are under audit and he will not be releasing them.”
  • July : “I haven’t had much pressure (to release tax returns). I’ll be honest, most people don’t care.”
  • September : “When the audit is complete I will release my returns. I have no problem with it. It doesn’t matter.”
  • September  debate: “I will release my tax returns, against my lawyer’s wishes, when [Clinton] releases her 33,000 emails that have been deleted.”
  • January , first press event as president: “I’m not releasing the tax returns because as you know they’re under audit.”
  • May : “I might release them after I’m out of office.”

And this is just regarding the release of his taxes. See how well trump 'follows through'? 

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Participates
8.2.1  arkpdx  replied to  cobaltblue @8.2    3 months ago

Trump living in your head 24 hours a day, seven days a week, 52 weeks a year will not serve any purpose and will not help solve any of the country's issues. Get over him already. 

 
 
 
cobaltblue
Junior Participates
8.2.2  cobaltblue  replied to  arkpdx @8.2.1    3 months ago
Get over him already

He'd be out of everyone's head if he had the respect to complete a peaceful transition of power. He may have even had somewhat of a legacy. But he cannot live without keeping himself in the news. Even if it's for traitorous conduct. It's what trump wants, arkie. He can't take your money if he doesn't keep himself in the spotlight. 

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Participates
8.2.3  arkpdx  replied to  cobaltblue @8.2.2    3 months ago

He's not in my head and there are several others here that do not have him in there head. If you would just ignore him he'd go away.  I completely ignore him . I have no interest in what he has done.

What I am interested in now is what Hunter Biden has done and how much his father )you know the "big guy is") is implicated in them . I am interested in inflation an how Biden is going to deal with it. I am interested in the high cost of energy and what Biden is going to do. I am interested in the crisis on the border the invasion and what Biden is going to do about it. I a interested in what actions Biden is going to to take to stop the smuggling of illegal drugs into the country especially fentanyl. I wonder what action Biden is going to take to get the return of Erica's citizens abandon by him in hostile countries. I am concerned about what biden's is going to do about curbing Putin and his ambitions in Ukraine. 

Those are the things that occupy my head those are important things in the here and now not something you might think trp did. You might want to start living in today's world and stop living in the past. 

And just what "traitorous things had he done. Even the kangaroo court called the January sixth committee has yet to find anything. 

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Junior Expert
8.2.4  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  arkpdx @8.2.3    3 months ago
What I am interested in now is what Hunter Biden has done and how much his father )you know the "big guy is") is implicated in them . I am interested in inflation an how Biden is going to deal with it. I am interested in the high cost of energy and what Biden is going to do. I am interested in the crisis on the border the invasion and what Biden is going to do about it. I a interested in what actions Biden is going to to take to stop the smuggling of illegal drugs into the country especially fentanyl. I wonder what action Biden is going to take to get the return of Erica's citizens abandon by him in hostile countries. I am concerned about what biden's is going to do about curbing Putin and his ambitions in Ukraine.

The multitude of deflections you have posted on this thread are getting way too tedious.

This thread is supposed to be about Nancy Pelosi wanting to punch out The Donald.

Do you have something relevant to that or just more stupid fucking deflections?

 
 
 
Revillug
Freshman Guide
8.2.5  Revillug  replied to  cobaltblue @8.2.2    3 months ago
He may have even had somewhat of a legacy.

Like he could say, "One of the things I am most proud of is how our administration helped with getting Covid vaccinations developed, approved, and into people's arms faster than most people would have ever believed possible before we did it."

It's practically the only good thing he ever did (probably for all the wrong, ok)  but he has to troll us like an antivaxxer.

 
 
 
cobaltblue
Junior Participates
8.2.6  cobaltblue  replied to  arkpdx @8.2.3    3 months ago
I have no interest in what he has done.

Jesus. Damn, arkie. I find that akin to "Fuck America and democracy." To each their own. I hate that trump is a traitorous lying grifter. I hate that people have died because he lied. I hate that he's as comfortable lying as he is with breathing. 

No interest at what he's done. Jesus. Well, good for you arkie. Good for you.

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Participates
8.2.7  arkpdx  replied to  cobaltblue @8.2.6    3 months ago
trump is a traitorous lying grifter

Prove it .

 people have died because he lied

Name them. 

he's as comfortable lying as he is with breathing 

Sounds like just about every politician I have ever heard of. 

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Participates
8.2.8  arkpdx  replied to  al Jizzerror @8.2.4    3 months ago

I didn't bring up Trump this time. Cobaltblue did in 8.2. I just responded to her post. Take it up with her. 

 
 
 
cobaltblue
Junior Participates
8.2.9  cobaltblue  replied to  arkpdx @8.2.8    3 months ago
I didn't bring up Trump this time.

The article is about Pelosi/trump. You brought up Hunter and Joe Biden.

 
 
 
cobaltblue
Junior Participates
8.2.10  cobaltblue  replied to  arkpdx @8.2.7    3 months ago
Prove it .

Read a reputable newspaper.

Name them.

Brian Sicknick and Ashli Babbitt are just two. He lied about the "stolen" election. They died as a direct result of his lie. But for his lie, Sicknick, Babbitt and three others would still be alive and at home with their families.

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Junior Expert
8.2.11  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  arkpdx @8.2.8    3 months ago
I didn't bring up Trump this time. Cobaltblue did in 8.2.

WTF?

Here is part of what YOU posted in comment 8.2.3:

What I am interested in now is what Hunter Biden has done and how much his father )you know the "big guy is") is implicated in them . I am interested in inflation an how Biden is going to deal with it. I am interested in the high cost of energy and what Biden is going to do. I am interested in the crisis on the border the invasion and what Biden is going to do about it. I a interested in what actions Biden is going to to take to stop the smuggling of illegal drugs into the country especially fentanyl. I wonder what action Biden is going to take to get the return of Erica's citizens abandon by him in hostile countries. I am concerned about what biden's is going to do about curbing Putin and his ambitions in Ukraine.

That's not about Trump, is it?

Why are you trying to blame a lovely woman (cobaltblue) for your persistent deflections?

Why don't you take your ridiculous deflection and make it into a ridiculous article?

That bullshit doesn't have anything to do with this thread.

 
 
 
cobaltblue
Junior Participates
8.2.12  cobaltblue  replied to  al Jizzerror @8.2.11    3 months ago
woman (cobaltblue)

It's late. Time for us to hit the hay. 

 
 
 
cobaltblue
Junior Participates
8.2.13  cobaltblue  replied to  Revillug @8.2.5    3 months ago
Like he could say,

You're right. His blackhole of narcissism fucked him (and his family) over for perpetuity. His name is synonymous with Benedict Arnold and John Wilkes Booth, and that's how he will be remembered forever. He's earned his place in history.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
8.2.14  Tessylo  replied to  arkpdx @8.2.3    3 months ago

OMG you have Hunter Biden Derangement Syndrome!

How many times do I have to tell you that clueless is no way to go through life son?

312326397_183867090843694_3386211388470563127_n.jpg?stp=dst-jpg_p526x296&_nc_cat=1&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=730e14&_nc_ohc=02aOhyCTdZYAX9sroDs&_nc_ht=scontent-iad3-1.xx&oh=00_AT8hGH4vBKDD-AMlJOd__UXahvkTTGxHfkM3840qtvPJsw&oe=6356319C

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Participates
8.2.15  arkpdx  replied to  cobaltblue @8.2.10    3 months ago

How many people died because of the riots in 2016 riots when Hillary lost. How many were injured. What was the cost of the damage and looting they caused. 

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Participates
8.2.16  arkpdx  replied to  al Jizzerror @8.2.11    3 months ago

Read the whole comment. You know the part where I said that Trump is not of any concern anymore but the thing in that paragraph were.  

I am trying to help you get over your Trump Derangement and concentrate on things that are really important. 

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
8.2.17  Tessylo  replied to  arkpdx @8.2.15    3 months ago

What riots when Hillary lost?

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Junior Expert
8.2.18  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  cobaltblue @8.2.12    3 months ago

jrSmiley_93_smiley_image.jpg

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Junior Expert
8.2.19  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  arkpdx @8.2.15    3 months ago
How many people died because of the riots in 2016 riots when Hillary lost.

Bullshit!

Let's see the link for that shit.

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Junior Expert
8.2.20  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  arkpdx @8.2.16    3 months ago
Read the whole comment. You know the part where I said that Trump is not of any concern anymore but the thing in that paragraph were. 

You should ask the wizard for a brain.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
8.2.21  devangelical  replied to  al Jizzerror @8.2.20    3 months ago

at his age that's third in line after a solid bowel movement and a boner.

 
 
 
afrayedknot
Sophomore Quiet
8.2.22  afrayedknot  replied to  al Jizzerror @8.2.20    3 months ago

And a heart. 

 
 
 
cobaltblue
Junior Participates
8.2.23  cobaltblue  replied to  afrayedknot @8.2.22    3 months ago

8.2.20, 8.2.21 and 8.2.21 are hysterical!!! Struck me so damn funny!!! dev, you fuckin' slay me!!!

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Quiet
8.2.24  igknorantzrulz  replied to  cobaltblue @8.2.23    3 months ago

so, you are a dragon woe man….?

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Junior Expert
8.2.25  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  igknorantzrulz @8.2.24    3 months ago

Cobaltblue is an extremely intelligent woman.

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Junior Expert
8.2.26  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  igknorantzrulz @8.2.24    3 months ago
dragon woe man….?

It's kinda difficult to perform searches on your phrases.

I found this:

512

And I even saw this:

512

Dragons and drag queens matter...

 
 

Who is online

Hallux
Just Jim NC TttH
Kavika
Snuffy
SteevieGee
evilgenius


45 visitors