Santos is Rewarded for being a Pathological Liar
McCarthy should ask Santos to resign.
George Santos gets two committee assignments
The House GOP Steering Committee on Tuesday recommended that embattled Rep. George Santos (R-N.Y.) sit on the House Small Business Committee and House Science, Space and Technology Committee , according to sources familiar with the assignments.
Santos’s assignment to the panels comes after multiple members of his own party have called on him to resign over his admitted fabrications about his work history and education, questions about his campaign finances, misleading claims of Jewish heritage and reported charges in Brazil related to checkbook fraud (which Santos has denied), among other issues.
The recommendation from the House GOP Steering Committee, a panel of around 30 members of House leadership and elected regional representatives, will have to be approved by the full House Republican Conference. The conference typically approves the steering panel’s recommendation.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/george-santos-gets-two-committeel
McCarthy is NOT asking Santos to resign, instead, he's being rewarded.
The House Science, Space and Technology Committee is going to be renamed to "The House Science Fiction , Space and Technology Committee."
Santos lied about everything. SANTOS NEVER ATTENDED COLLEGE.
Tags
Who is online
438 visitors
Just like major skank Taylor-Greene
Why haven't the Israelis killed Greene with their "space lasers?"
there's a new picture of santos out wearing an AR-15 lapel pin, like the rest of the teabag sedition wing of the GOP.
Don't tell me, he was a decorated marksman in the services...
he has a purple heart for being shot in the face.
... a lot.
Are Americans smart enough to realize how unimportant integrity and common sense are to the Republicans by appointing persons like Santos and Greene to committees? Actually, since those two were elected, I personally doubt it, and I think the Republican Party is suicidal.
Are Americans smart enough to realize how unimportant integrity and common sense are to the Politicians?
No, as evidenced by the high number of re-elections that occur. The standard mantra is "Congress sucks and is full of criminals, except for my guy who's great". Too many sheep blindly follow their guy I'm afraid.
>ahem< cough, cough...
[Ahem]
[deleted]
[Cough, Cough.]
It's a requirement nowadays Buzz for republicans
Talk to us when Democrats hold their own accountable for lying.
Starting with Brandon the Human Fuck Up Machine (who has lied his whole damn political career about everything and anything!). Then work their way over to Elizabeth "Don't call me Pocahontas!" Warren. They can circle over to Adam "Bobblehead doll" Schiff. Followed by Eric Swalwell. Then clean out all of those who worked on the Jan 6th committee. The entire squad (however many members they are up to). After that they can go after Pelosi and Schumer.
Once they are done with that get back to us about Santos.
We all know that's never going to happen.
When you find someone that has lied about every aspect of their life and even used different names get back to us.
Until then it is called living in denial while pointing fingers.
Then lets start with Biden. You seem to ignore all his bullshit to the point you and the rest of the left make excuses.
No, Let's start with what the seed is about.
That seems to be too much for some people.
So you want me to "find someone that has lied about every aspect of their life" (3.1.1) and when I do you try to avoid the "someone that has lied about every aspect of their life".
You asked, I obliged. You moved the goal posts. Why?
accuracy matters...
Don't know where you got that quoted part, but that's not me. You could at least get that much right.
I fixed it for you. you know how much I love to point out trumpster hypocrisy.
You didn't fix a damn thing. Still misquoted. But then again, I can't expect a Bidenite to get much right.
... says the guy that swore an oath to defend the constitution from domestic enemies.
And there it is. When losing an argument, the Bidenite attacks.
This article is about that lying piece of fecal matter that was just placed on two Congressional committees.
Are you forced to deflect because you refuse to admit the truth?
Nope. Not afraid to admit the truth at all. In fact truth is; I was ask to " find someone that has lied about every aspect of their life" ( 3.1.1 ). So I did. And funny enough, when I do, you all jump in with bullshit and personal attacks (which is really not all that surprising) and avoid the subject I introduced. Now I wonder why that is...
And here you are ignoring the fact that this article is about Santos and Congress.
Here's Santos with his new boyfriend:
Maybe because you lost all credibility while being a trump supporter.
Wait, what I supposed to care what you and the other Bidenites thought of me?
... too late.
Oh what's wrong? The topic is pathological liars. I identified one. Did I not answer a question with something other than what you all wanted to hear? Maybe in YOUR world my answer is blasphemy, in mine, it's called truth and fact.
So you have no problem with Santos then? You think he is a stand up guy that should be in congress?
No other reason for you to keep drifting away from actually talking about him.
I have issue with it. I never said I didn't have a problem.
You mean aside from answering the question you ask in 3.1.1 that seems to have triggered everybody?
It wasn't an actual question. I was being facetious.
I don't think it's that Republicans can't handle the truth, they just prefer lies, especially when the lie aligns with their already indoctrinated religious conservative indoctrination. In their minds a lie can be turned into truth because with God all things are possible...
Oh, jeez...
I'm so sorry...
I didn't realize that you are the author of this article.
Oh, wait...
Is that a Santos style lie?
Sorry. Don't walk it back now. You ask the question, I answered, you didn't like my answer then you all went batshit crazy over the answer.
Subject he introduced? Isn;t this your article? What gives him the right to introduce an off topic conversation?
What arrogance!
No, the topic is ONE pathological liar (Santos) who just got appointed to two Congressional committees.
I wrote this article, so I'm pretty sure I know what the topic is.
Why don't you write an article about other pathological liars (like Trump).
just put your hands over your eyes and go to a happy place where your hypocrisy won't be noticed.
How dare people point out your double standards!
Actually, do you see a question mark on my comment? It was a statement, not a question.
So you are happy with him and welcome him on the team aye...
If he's so hell bent on talking about Biden he should do an article and show the rest of NT what the hell he's talking about.
[deleted]
This is somehow my fault I guess. I blame the dye in my system. Haha
It's not your fault. They could stop anytime they want but they must have the last word and keep derailing a seed. It's all they know how to do
Ok. You're correct. It wasn't a "question" per se but rather than a directions.
Well, I found somebody that has lied about every aspect of their life and got back to you. You all then proceeded to set your hair on fire over it.
What gets me is absurd comparisons. All politicians lie yet this guy took it up several levels.
The part where he scammed people out of money that was supposed to help their sick pets really pissed me off.
The two don't even compare and you know it. That also wasn't the only part of my statement.
ey could stop anytime they want but they must have the last word and keep derailing a seed. It's all they know how to do
Lol. and the award for least self aware post goes to.
Now how about another 15 posts whining about other members?
How so?
besides that, they can all be fucking scumbags 6.5 days a week as long as they show up for church on sunday, toss some cash in the dish, and get forgiven...
I will say it again. He shouldn't be in Congress nor on any committees.
But, go ahead, justify your obsession with this otherwise anonymous backbencher in the House while carrying water for an actual President who has done nothing but lie about his background, education, achievements etc for 50 years. Biden's literally famous for lying and somehow that's okay.
If you can't or refuse to see any difference between this piece of work and most other people in government, I can't help you.
I'd try and deflect from the rwnj shit show too, if I was stupid enough to be a supporter of the teabag free dumb cockless...
“Did you miss that part and forget how conversations work?”
Funny coming from one only so willing to delete commentary that dare differ from the preferred narrative. Hypocrisy. But your comments are welcome here…take a lesson.
Who ever said I said it was ok? The fact that you say he was wrong admits we are right yet you all still just want to say, well look at the other side. Amazes me the thinking of the right wing on this forum. Just because I lean Liberal I am somehow a die hard fan that would never ever criticize him. Bullshit. Unlike some republicans, I do not walk lockstep with the party or like everything they do.
It just sounds like a bunch of kids saying, but Mom, Johnny does it....
it's not a matter of refusing. I ask you to differentiate between the 2 and you, obviously, can't.
I am not going to sit here and explain differences to you between two people.
Find another patsy....
So you are going to bring the meta from another article here. Have fun with that.
When you can differentiate between the two get back with me.
When all you do is insult, sometimes I wonder why I bother.
DERP!
I see.
You refuse to own your censorshit.
Of course it was brought to another thread to avoid your censorshit over there.
I never flag. I think the last time I did was because it was particularly nasty. I think that was several years ago though.
If I remember correctly, one time I was told something along the lines of, if you are not going to flag, don't complain....
Haha
Still doesn't stop my complaining....
[deleted]
[deleted]
He's on a level of his own
pop quiz - who was the first person in that picture to say "don't touch my penis" to the other?
Comical coming from a trump supporter...
[deleted]
I guess when you can't defend Retrumplican lying all you have left are fucking lame deflections.
Aren't you proud of your Party?
[deleted]
[deleted]
I guess we're just lucky that he says that he is a NASA trained astronaut and the first man to land on the moon in drag.
Where does the GOP find these guys!?
I never thought that the Republicans would force Santos to resign, the numbers split in the House are just too close that the Republicans need all their seats. But let's wait to see what the final vote is before we condemn all Republicans here, this is only a recommendation. And I agree that a lot of the noise is partisan in nature. The Republicans will defend their own just like the Democrats are defending their own. It's the nature of the establishment.
so party before country, ... gotcha...
Can you honestly say the Democrats would do any differently if they were in that boat?
Yes.
Anthony Weiner (House) and Al Franken (Senate) got booted by the Dems.
They resigned and most Democrats now consider Franken's resignation a massive mistake.
It's like claiming Republicans deserve credit for Bob Foley and jon ensign resigning.
No, they resigned. Your statement implies they were expelled from the House and that did not happen.
Anthony Weiner history:
So what are you trying to say? Yes, he resigned. That's what I said. He was not expelled from the House, he resigned. And from your post, it took three weeks for him to resign.
There are two general methods of resignation: voluntary (honorable) and forced.
Weiner was forced out. His resignation was a forced resignation.
It is rare for the House to expel a member since that takes 2/3 vote. The normal course of action is to force them to resign.
In short, it is wrong to consider Weiner to have honorably 'stepped down'.
Now, Santos should resign (honorably). But I predict he will not do so. If he 'resigns' it will be a result of being forced out. I also predict that the House would never secure 2/3 vote to legally expel him. The GoP has the power to make this happen (many Ds will vote to expel) but they will not pull that trigger.
But it was still a resignation, his choice. Weiner didn't have to resign, he could have taken his chances with an expulsion vote but he decided to resign rather than take that risk. There is no way to force a sitting congressman to resign.
There's a list of seven House Republicans who have called on Santos to resign. But a resignation is still the choice of Santos. Your trying to differentiate and it really comes down to resigning for personal reasons or resigning in disgrace.
Personally I think he should resign but as I said when this first came up I didn't think that McCarthy would be quick to expel him. The numbers in the House between Republicans and Democrats are too close. McCarthy might feel differently if a Congressman would be appointed from the same party but that's not how the rules work. It's a special election to fill the seat and no guarantee a Republican would get the vote.
Yeah Snuffy, he technically resigned.
The point, again, is that Weiner was forced out by his party. That was what you and Al were discussing.
And that is good to hear; a little integrity in a few politicians. And of course the resignation is his choice; that was never in question.
It would be significant if McCarthy would step up, but instead he is allowing Santos to serve on committees and operate like any new member: Santos named to two House committees even as he faces growing calls to resign
Do you see that as the GoP forcing him out?
I am not trying to differentiate I am absolutely differentiating. There is a clear difference between honorably resigning and resigning out of force.
No, you're just playing your word games again. Fuck off
... they sure do, but harboring pedophiles, bag men, and criminals is nothing new to them
Just take note, Snuffy, as to how this went.
Al did not say they were officially expelled, he wrote colloquially: "got booted". Being reasonable, that can mean sufficient pressure from the party to force a resignation up to formal expulsion. Not so much with Franken, but definitely for Weiner.
Your insistence that Al's words must only mean 'expulsion' is the word game.
As usual, when faced with factual / logical opposition you resort to blaming your interlocutor and other bad behavior.
Classy
The GoP should do the right thing and expel Santos. He certainly deserves it. But given how McCarthy is treating Santos, there is no real chance that 2/3 of the House will vote to expel. The Ds would probably almost all vote to expel, but the Rs currently show an overwhelming reluctance to do likewise. Not too surprising given the degradation of the GoP since Trump entered the picture.
Santos has insisted he will not resign. So if/when he does resign, it will be a forced resignation. And if that happens, it will be fair to say that the GoP "booted" him.
Yes.
Nixon resigned.
Nixon was "forced" to resign by Congressional Republicans.
Senators Goldwater and Scott and Congressman Rhodes met with Nixon in the Oval Office and told him his support in Congress had all but disappeared. Scott told reporters afterward that they did not pressure Nixon to resign, but simply told the president that "the situation is very gloomy on Capitol Hill." Rhodes told the president he would face certain impeachment when the articles came up for vote in the full House . By Majority Leader O'Neill's estimate, no more than 75 representatives were willing to vote against the obstruction-of-justice article. Goldwater and Scott told the president that not only were there enough votes in the Senate to convict him , but that no more than 15 or so senators were willing to vote for acquittal. Goldwater later wrote that as a result of the meeting, Nixon "knew beyond any doubt that one way or another his presidency was finished." That night, Nixon finalized his decision to leave office.
Nixon was not impeached nor was he convicted. Butt when ir became clear that he was on the verge of impeachment and conviction, Nixon decided to cut and run.
[deleted]
Try again.
Both committed crimes and had real physical evidence against them. They resigned because of it.
Now, should Santos resign over the the charges against him? IMO yes; but he is choosing to fight those which is his right under the law. Innocent until proven guilty.
So please stop stating Democrats hold their won accountable. It simply isn't true.
Geeze, another one who wants to fight an incorrect statement.
Yes Nixon resigned but the Congressional Republicans did not force the resignation. They did not have that power. All they did was bring the simple fact to his attention that there were enough votes in the House to impeach him and in the Senate to convict him. So Nixon made a deal to resign and got Ford to pardon him. But Congress did not force him to resign. He could have stayed and fought impeachment. Yes he would have lost but the choice to resign was still his alone. To say that Congress forced him to resign means that he didn't have any choice in the matter and that is just not true. Your own statement shows it, he decided to cut and run.
In the case of Santos, the House cannot force him to resign. They can censure him (which is a simple majority vote) or they can expel him (two-thirds vote). Or they can make his life difficult by removing him from any committees and other Congressmen can refuse to meet and work with him. And they can repeatedly ask him to resign. But they cannot force him to resign, that is still his choice.
This is wrong. Resignation is the method of voluntarily leaving Congress which can be done for honorable means or to escape a dishonorable situation. A congressman can have different reasons why they are resigning, but the act of resigning is just the singular method of voluntarily leaving Congress. Neither chamber has the Constitutional power to force someone to resign. They can come to a person and show they have the votes to expel the person and offer him the option to resign but that resignation would still be a choice and not forced. There have been several instances where a Congressman has refused to resign, fought the expulsion and won.
Santos comes across as many things including a con man and a grifter, but he doesn't come across as stupid. Why would he resign when he's also facing criminal proceedings where he can use a resignation offer as a counter to criminal prosecution? Why would he walk away from a position that (a) pays $174k a year and (b) has generated more millionaires than any other career field percentage wise?
For the record I think he should resign but it's not my choice to make.
Always
Do you require a trial to determine that he lied before you would take action against him? For example, if you were Speaker right now, would you bring Santos up for expulsion given that he does not deny the blatant fraud (lies) which allowed him to be elected on false pretenses? Or would you require a civil suit verdict before you act?
Refusal to accept the reality of a forced resignation.
In the real world, the voluntary resignation can come about by an individual choosing to resign from a post (e.g. an official who no longer can support her president and resigns). It also is a result of force (an offer one cannot refuse) by political (and other) pressure. Nixon was forced to resign. Weiner was forced to resign.
In business, founders of successful companies are forced to resign when the board determines they are no longer net valuable to the health of the company.
Yes the resignation, as a technical instrument, is voluntary. But no, the reality of the situation is that sometimes the voluntary act was done with a forced hand.
Giving Santos committee assignments is the opposite of forcing him to resign.
Why are you always insulting TiG?
He's not playing any games, YOU are.
I can't wait to see his answer. Of course, you will have to cut and paste it for me.
Only one of them committed a crime. Weiner was prosecuted for showing dick pics to underage girls. He's a piece of shit. Weiner pled guilty to one count of transferring obscene material to a minor. He served a 21 month sentence in Federal prison.
What fucking "crime" did Al Franken commit? What fucking evidence? Why didn't (Republican) prosecutors ever charge him?
Santos is wanted for fraud in Brazil.
He is accused of stealing shit from his former roommates and embezzlement and for embezzling $3000 from a veteran's charity.
You are defending the indefensible.
Prosecutors in Brazil reopening criminal fraud case against George Santos
BY JARED GANS - 01/03/23 Brazilian authorities are reopening a criminal fraud case against Rep.-elect George Santos (R-N.Y.) from more than a decade ago and seeking his response, adding to the local and federal investigations already ongoing in the United States following the revelations of the false statements he has made about himself.A spokesperson for Rio de Janeiro’s prosecutor’s office told The New York Times that police had been unable to locate Santos, but with his location known, the office will request the Justice Department formally notify him of the charges.
Santos reportedly entered a small clothing store in Niterói, a city outside Rio de Janeiro, shortly before his 20th birthday in 2008 and spent almost $700 using a stolen checkbook and a fake name, according to court records.
Santos admitted to the shop owner that he committed fraud in August 2009 and wrote on a social media website that he knows he “screwed up” but wants to pay. He and his mother told police the next year that he stole the checkbook from a man that the mother formerly worked for, the Times reported.
A judge approved a charge against Santos in September 2011 and ordered Santos to respond, but he was in the United States by October.
Bullfuckingshit!
I put quotation marks around the word "forced".
I then posted a historical citation that included this sentenceScott told reporters afterward that they did not pressure Nixon to resign, but simply told the president that "the situation is very gloomy on Capitol Hill."
Reading is fundamental.
DERP!
oooooo, air quotes. Yeah, that's the ticket.... not. Fuck, you respond with a pasted comment that talks about forced resignations and I explained why Congress does not have the authority to do that. Nobody really does. They can request, suggest, offer a deal, etc but they cannot force someone to resign.
Knowledge is fundamental...
Okay. Here the fucking historical quotation I posted in comment ( 4.1.13 ). Unfortunately it didn't paste correctly in comment ( 4.1.23 )
Scott told reporters afterward that they did not pressure Nixon to resign, but simply told the president that "the situation is very gloomy on Capitol Hill." Rhodes told the president he would face certain impeachment when the articles came up for vote in the full House .
Ask anyone with an education what the quotation marks around the word "force" means in that same comment.
Nixon was "forced" to resign by Congressional Republicans.
And learn some fucking history.
One might say learn to read and comprehend a thread. 4.1.16 already talked about Nixon's resignation and how it came about. I was alive when this all happened, I lived it. In the case of Nixon, Congress did not force anything. The Republicans went to him and presented him with the fact that there were enough votes in the House to impeach and there were enough votes in the Senate to convict and that Nixon's presidency was ending. Now Nixon could have fought impeachment but he decided the safer course of action was to resign. There is a lot of speculation but I've never seen/heard any direct evidence that a deal was made for Nixon to resign and Ford to pardon him, but that sure seems like what happened. Congress did not force Nixon to resign and from your paste above
they did not "force" him either. All they did was lay out the facts.
The discussion thread was that Congress cannot force Santos to resign because Congress does not have the Constitutional authority to force anybody to resign. For a Congressman or Senator they can pull them off committees, they can censure them or they can expel them. Congressional leadership can go to Santos and plead, beg or demand that he resign but they cannot force him to resign, plan and simple. And as I explained elsewhere, why would he give up a $174k job and any potential leverage when he's also looking at potential criminal charges out of the State of New York?
You can call me names but I'm not the one here trying to redefine the usage of words.
DERP!
Certainly not much integrity in the GOP these days.
The thing that will most likely bring Santos downfall is the money that he loaded himself. Where did it come from since he didn't have money the year before?
He should be put in charge of the committee that guards our ''space lasers''.
there's video of santos introducing himself as anthony devolder to a bunch of trump suckers in 2020...
Ya! A complete fraud and typical republican
All Republicans are rewarded for being liars. They don't even hide it any longer. Look at the Ohio corruption cases with First Energy, Larry Householder and a host of Republican politicians who blatantly flaunt their corruption. They should all be ousted for their blatant opposition to both federal and state laws on voting and their shameless gerrymandering. Lying is their super power because their base loves the lies.
This seed is about George Santos and McCarthey giving him 2 committee assignements. It's not about Biden or anybody else. I suggest Al flag all off topic comments. They're not even stupid comments that everyone should look at but an attempt to derail someone's seed
I don't believe in censorshit.
I think it's amusing to see the knuckle draggers try to defend the indefensible with lame deflections.
I know you don't but these off topic dickheads harsh the mellow of all the cool kids here.
The contrast between the idiotic comments from the White wingers and the sensible people is very revealing.
some questionable comments, but no flags yet. that'll probably change once somebody gets their feelings hurt ...
I hate it when they harsh our buzz.
don't get mad, get even...
So he stole from people, completely fabricated his resume, under investigation in another country, under investigation in this country for his finances and he gets committee assignments...
The gop rewarding bad behavior.
not bad behavior, prerequisites for being a maga republican...
There is nothing funnier than the party of Joe Biden, Elizabeth Warren and stolen valor Blumenthal complaining about supporting liars.
So instead of republicans saying yeah he is a moron, give him committee assignments and point the finger at others.
Party of moral values my ass.
Republicans have nothing to do with you supporting Joe Biden's decades of lying about himself, or Warren lying about her background for career advancement, or Blumenthal's stolen valor.
You support liars. Stop doing that before you criticize anyone else for doing what you do.
Funny I never mention supporting any of those people...
What is it, a lot of people on the right always say to me? Something along the lines of stop projecting....
YOU are supporting a pathological liar (Santos) by continuing to deflect on this thread.
Butt, Santos will never tell more lies than Trump (your queen).
.
[deleted]
Good grief man, get a grip. Referring to Biden as "Brandon" is childish. Constant generic criticism of Biden is beyond credible.
This constant mantra of "Brandon", "human fuck-up machine" get old. Yes Biden most definitely has made mistakes and has policies worthy of challenge. Pick an issue (e.g. the border, Afghanistan, economy, classified docs, etc.) or two and make arguments without all the emotion. Argue specifics. That would be much more persuasive than endless, repetitive, generic, chant-like emoting.
It's so tiresome, why I generally don't even bother to read his comments.
He's young and just getting started
There is nothing funnier than watching all of the Retrumplicans deflecting to avoid discussing the actual topic of this article: Putting a pathological liar on two Congressional committees.
standard republican operating procedure.
Santos is particularly egregious ... to the point of stealing $3,000 raised for an army vet's dog surgery. Chase your own squirrels down your own rabbit holes. Sometimes it is just best to stfu when partisan crap is in your path rather than wading into it and wildly pointing at someone not responsible for the stink.
Where you a student of mine you would get an F for logic.
That dog was a service dog for ARMY VET
Now I want to see some criticism for that piece of nastiness from all of you self-declared patriots.
oh yeah...the dog died because Santos refused to give the money to the vet for the beloved pooch's surgery
People voted him in. If there is a way to recall him then it is up to his constituents to do it if they wish. Otherwise it will be up to them to vote him out or let him remain in congress in 2 years. I question how quite a few people got elected and continue to get elected even after they stick it to the people that voted them in. Ultimately it is not my call to make.
McCarthy can force him to resign.
Pelosi had the balls to force Anthony Weiner to resign.
I don't think Franken should have resigned. What he did was nothing compared to a lot of these people.
My understanding is Pelosi called for his resignation but had said she could not force someone to resign. As far as I am concerned as long as an elected official does not do something that lawfully disqualifies them from holding office it is up to the people that voted him or her in to either recall them if possible or vote them out next time around..
I don't think he should have resigned either.
Santos would be stupid to resign. If he resigned now, he would lose leverage if financial misconduct is found. It to his benefit to save a potential future resignation as part of plea bargain negotiations. It's also not to the repub advantage to try to force him out as they would probably lose the seat in a special election in this historically Dem district. When Nancy pushed Weiner out, she didn't have to worry about losing a Dem seat.
McCarthy doesn't have the balls to ask Santos to resign.
A slimebag like Santos will not resign. One must have some modicum of character to resign (or, to concede a lost election).
His balls are now matching earrings sported by Marjorie.
It surprises you that a politician might do something in his own best interest?
Why would that surprise anyone?
NY doesn't have a recall measure in their State Constitution. So they are stuck with this guy.
It will be interesting to see if a recall measure is introduced for future idiots.
I wouldn't recommend kitara walking anywhere in NYC without his entourage...
She only trolls the streets of NYC with her "bodyguard" - Gym Jordan.
santos was the shower attendant for jordan's wrestling team, back when he was straight...
Santos was their "blow dryer."
he never tapped out...
He may resign as part of a plea deal. Weiner did it to avoid an estimated $1M defense bill.
A forced resignation is indeed possible. An honorable resignation will almost certainly NOT happen.
He probably needs the income.
Are you suggesting he has run out 'regular' folks to fleece? His heroes and heroines have not skipped a beat.
I was thinking about his Congressional salary.
He certainly has no honor or shame, that much is apparent.
Don't you have to be honorable to resign honorably?
There are protests today to have Santos removed from office and the Nassau Republicans are trying to get his passport revoked.
You might want to check this out:
btw.... he is my rep so this is personal to me.
He looked like he was about to yell at the guy when he tripped on something.
I have to disagree with the guest.
I don't think people like that ever change.
Pathological liars can't change anything except their stories (lies).
To be fair, many republicans are calling for george anthony devolder santos to resign. Unbelievably, I'm saddened at watching the gop implode and turn on each other.
From Twitter: Someone should make "George Santos Lie-A-Day" desk calendars.
Busy couple of weeks for me. This should turn into a fun article, but I can only pop in here and there.
wtf? that sucks... do what you gotta. we'll leave the door unlocked. this santos clown will be a story for awhile.
I gotta come back; I'm in charge of changing bong water and rolling in order to keep up with the demand. I notice you took the old "a little dab will do ya" to a higher level, dev.
huh?... oh yeah..., that too...
You're not mixing margheritas and martinis?
That cat looks stuck up...more than most cats
hey! wtf?
He doesn't look stuck-up?
not with his shades on...
I wasn't talking about your cat
that kitty above wants you to reach for the tag on his collar...
Sadly Santos and his animal rescue (if it exists) screwed a navy vet out of $3000 that was meant to save the vets dogs life through needed surgery. The dog died because of Santos.
If this proves out to be true, I saw the Vet and his friend interviewed and it sure sounded legit, Santos is scum, and in no way should that POS be in congress.
there you go, santos is now the foremost proven authority on trumpism... living the lie...
Definitely sounds legit. Just one more thing to sadden the shit out of me. What the hell ...
Did he grift his own mother's funeral?
Sure looks like he did, unreal.
Yep, right off the road & into the DING WEEDS....
Why George Santos is denying that he performed as a drag queen even as he leaves a litany of other questions unanswered
He can't be a drag queen if he's a republican nor can he be gay if a right winger....LMAO
no, he just can't get caught. oops...
Another one I just heard. Now he is lying about having to have knee replacement surgery after playing on a college volleyball team...
Then he was complaining about kids having college debt and saying he finished college debt free...
So he lied about the college and any debt and his parents bankruptcy...
This thing could tell the truth to save his life.
he recognized his value as a token for the GOP, created their perfect image of it, and capitalized upon it...
Amazing, a star volleyball player for a school that he never attended.
He must be a shape shifter...LMAO
he can't put any ball over a net...
Here's a pic of Santos from 2008.
LMAO, now there is the perfect Republican, Hispanic, gay, drag queen, and liar par excellence.
Yep, "Kitara Ravache" is the hottest woman in the Republican caucus (and she's also the best caucus sucker).
It seems that Kitara also has the second largest clitoris in the Republican caucus. Marjorie Taylor Greene's enormous clitoris is bigger butt it is rumored to actually be a penis.
heh, there's bound to be a lot more pictures coming...
good girl...
george santos - republican of the year.
There's a competition for that title...
(from Crooks and Liars, an aptly named medium considering this particular matter)
If only the American voters were capable of critical thinking, what you see above would be suicidal for the GOP.
I just saw on the news, journalism indicating that Santos claimed to have started his drag career at the age of 17 and he claimed to have won many beauty contests.
Someone even provided video purported to be Santos in Drag Character.
Rather convincing.
They also dug up interviews involving the LGBTQ community from one Anthony Devolder
in Politico circa 2019.
He also claimed to have starring roles in Disney films.
He's a grifter that lied and used his mothers death and supposedly his dogs death
to raise money for his own use.
He is so despicable, he lied about his being Jewish and being related to Holocaust
victims to get elected in a largely Jewish US Congressional District.
IMHO he should get free one way airfare back to Brazil like Bin Laden's last flight.
Fortunately most Americans voted against the Retrumplicans.
The Retrumplicans failed in an attempted coup. They have no respect for, nor do they have any allegiance for, the US Constitution. The worship their fearful leader and the political Party he destroyed.
The members of the Retrumplican Party are unAmerican traitors who desire a new unCivil War.
cool. I look forward to properly venting their attics.
Hilarious:
Scientists Welcome 'Astronaut,' 'Nobel Winner' George Santos To House Science Committee
the teabag free dumb cockless is happy to have a lightning rod...
funny, his ex-wife claimed he could never consistently put one thru the uprights...
Lindsey Graham found out that George Santos Is a drag queen.
I'm waiting for the "I have an identical twin that has done this stuff to me all my life" claim next.
Oh shit, Santos has an evil twin?
[deleted]
Do you remember when George Santos was o the Hannah Montana Show?
Here's the latest report (lie) on the Santos campaign finances.
Bill Maher "explains" George Santos.
It's unfolding in real time today as Santos completely amends, amends and amends his campaign
financial disclosures several times as the previous campaign treasurer has cut him loose, now he has
submitted files with a new treasurer named who denies he works with or for Santos or the campaign.
He is alleging electronic signature forgery by the Santos campaign.
Suddenly the personal loans to the campaign were not personal loans, but no sources are listed?
CMTSU
His explanations of the source of his campaign funds is a fucking moving target.
Yes, George Santos has a "MyPillow."
"I cashed in all my quarters"
... after he lost his lip balm and tic tacs.
This just in: Devolder Santos has declared that he is done lying for good. To that end, he has had one of trump's able lawyers create an ironclad document to ensure such.
LOL
Cheering for George Santos to gain a republican party leadership postion.
howler monkeys...
prepping to audition for committee assignments...
the 2 leading contenders for getting their tonsils flocked by trump...
... on a regular basis.
Light bulb moment!
The
RepublicanAmerican Fascist Party is holding a contest: the most outrageous wins!Holy crap. When does it end?
I guess saying you produced a panned and failed Broadway play is more believable than saying you produced West Side Story.
typical republican grifter...
I caught some blurb earlier that some former employee has alleged sexual harassment. it could be entertaining.
...wanna be staffer, close enough.
the FEC or the FBI, looks like some grim prospects for kitara...
santos makes mitt all tingly, down there...
white supremacist elimination bump...
MTG and George Santos are co-sponsoring a bill that could ban LGBTQ books in classrooms
The irony is beyond the beyond.
That's such bullshit!
That kind of censorshit should be done at the local level if done at all
That's rich coming from a gay drag queen and George Santos
santos won't be disavowed by the GOP until he's gone down, er, ... removed from office.
... after he's gone down on all the GOP bible thumpers in congress.