╌>

City Orders Removal of Ohio Man’s Zombie Nativity Scene

  

Category:  Religion & Ethics

Via:  johnrussell  •  11 years ago  •  21 comments

City Orders Removal of Ohio Man’s Zombie Nativity Scene

City Orders Removal of Ohio Man’s Zombie Nativity Scene


by  jonathanturley

 



12341215_511490252345357_7300967077313244812_n

 

Tis the season for holiday display litigation. In Sycamore, Ohio, Jasen Dixon has been cited for putting up a Nativity scene in the front of his house. Dixon’s vision however has a zombie baby that many find offensive. The citation raises serious first amendment questions in the application of a code provision barring “accessory structures” in a front yard. That seems a vague concept and one that is prone to arbitrary or capricious applications. The question is whether other, more conventional holiday displays have been allowed.

 

Dixon has already been fined $500 and has removed the roof of the decoration to see if it will comply with the regulation.

Dixon insists that this is art and free expression. He has a plausible case if he can show that he has been singled out for this treatment by the city. I fail to see how a holiday decoration would be defined as an accessory structure or the basis for prohibiting such decorations given their political, religious, or artistic content.

What do you think?

Source:  Washington Post

http://jonathanturley.org/2015/12/09/city-orders-removal-of-ohio-mans-zombie-nativity-scene/




Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
link   seeder  JohnRussell    11 years ago

This sort of thing is a perennial topic these days. Does a local government (neighborhood) have the right to control what is seen in public if it offends a lot of people. Jesus Zombie, confederate flag, etc.

What if someone wanted to put a sculpture that looked like a pile of trash in front of their house ? How about a statue of a 8 year old girl in stages of undress ? What is the limit of free speech ? 

Is banning zombie baby Jesus a free speech violation ? Of course, but then so are the other examples I gave. 

 

At least it's not a baby Muhammad. 

 

 

 

 
 
 
Cerenkov
Professor Silent
link   Cerenkov  replied to  JohnRussell   11 years ago

Nothing to do with offense or religion. He violated a code. I can't build a gazebo in my front yard but I'm not freaking out like a liberal.

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
link   Hal A. Lujah    11 years ago

It's fitting, considering Jesus was supposedly beat to a bloody pulp and then came back to life, and people celebrate him by pretending to eat his flesh and drink his blood.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
link   seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Hal A. Lujah   11 years ago

Even if we agree with you, all that was not the case when he was a baby. 

 
 
 
Cerenkov
Professor Silent
link   Cerenkov  replied to  Hal A. Lujah   11 years ago

Not much respect for diversity, eh?

 
 

Who is online





103 visitors