Hillary Winning Across The Board In Swing States (RED RULES)
https://news.vice.com/story/live-election-day-turnout-results-with-votecastry
The latest election data from 8 swing states
Updated: 2:20 p.m. E.T.
Florida
- 74.9 percent of expected total voters
- Clinton: 49 percent
- Trump: 45 percent
Colorado:
- 72.2 percent of expected total voters
- Clinton: 47 percent
- Trump: 42 percent
Iowa:
- 55.9 percent of expected total voters
- Clinton: 45 percent
- Trump: 46 percent
Wisconsin:
- 47.9 percent of expected total voters
- Clinton: 49 percent
- Trump: 43 percent
Nevada:
- 58.7 percent of expected total voters
- Clinton: 47 percent
- Trump: 44 percent
Ohio:
- 59.8 percent of expected total voters
- Clinton: 46 percent
- Trump: 45 percent
Pennsylvania
- 45.9 percent of expected total voters
- Hillary: 48 percent
- Trump: 44 percent
Article is LOCKED by author/seeder
Who is online
37 visitors
RED RULES ;
ANY COMMENT FOR WHICH THE REPLY BUTTON HAS BEEN DISABLED WILL BE DELETED
Instead of deleting, how about mocking relentlessly?
WTF kind of red rule is that and how does one get to disable the reply button?
No kidding, I've never heard of that before.
Nah, nuke em.
Do either of you have anything to say about the seeded topic?
Good on the early results.
Although nuke em or relentlessly mocking works on violators of the reply button.
The US territory of Guam named the first to vote, they are 15 hours ahead of the mainland voted for Clinton 75 to 25 percent.
Although their votes cannot be counted, their record of voting for the winner goes back decades, for both dems and republican.
There is a new voter turnout projection system being used for the first time today. No one knows whether it will work or not , other than on paper. So far, the results are very favorable for Hillary and it will be interesting to see how close the projection comes to the final actual tally.
This is funny. Now tell me how they know which candidate a person has voted for?
Often reports like this are conspiratorial.
There was a report coming out of Pennsylvania that there were 19 incidents with voting machines where the voter was trying to select Donald Trump but the machine wasn't registering their vote correctly. Donald Trump's legal team is already working on filing a legal action to have those machines removed and replaced with paper ballots.
I heard that. Be assured he will use that to say he was robbed nationally.
Those machines are sensitive to the way the button is pushed. If you don't use the stylus just so they can malfunction. It is probably user error, but why does the state have such a piss poor voting machine to begin with?
why does the state have such a piss poor voting machine to begin with?
The question is why does the whole country still use these outdated voting machines. I just think if we can file our taxes electronically then why can't we vote the same way. Our taxes are connected to our SSN so why not our vote?
Great question , and that has been seriously considered. The teams that investigated and researched the project were all very experienced, and came back with the same conclusion: It's too risky as anything can be hacked if someone wants to bad enough. They couldn't guarantee it at all.
The latest VoteCastr data from 8 swing states
Updated: 3:48 p.m. E.T.
Florida
Colorado:
Iowa:
Wisconsin:
Nevada:
Ohio:
Pennsylvania
Trump supporters blocking entrance to polls & intimidating voters in Coral Springs, Florida. Pics sent by volunteer from HRC campaign
The picture could just be a group of Trump supporters standing around talking with each other. It's hard to make the case that voters are being blocked from voting just by this picture alone.
I doubt if the words are based just on the picture, don't you?
These projections are about as valid as the pre-election polls they are based on. Every race but Wisconsin being within 3 points essentially means they are all tossups, certainly within the margin of error for any projection.
I doubt if they would have publicized this method so much unless they were reasonably sure it was going to be pretty accurate. I guess we will find out in a few hours.
By the way Sean, these projections are not based on pre election polls. They are based on turnout today and the early voting.
sure it was going to be pretty accurate
I'm sure they will be accurate within a couple points, but if the election is as close as this model is claiming it to be, then they could easily get the winner wrong in a number of states.
these projections are not based on pre election polls
Yes. They are.
we’ll be relying on the system developed by VoteCastr, which will compare proprietary pre–Election Day polls against turnout measured by observers precinct by precinct, in an effort to describe how the candidates are faring through the day.
If the results were based on pre-election polls what would be the point. The projection is based on today's turnout measured against polling, yes.
We will see in a few hours how accurate they were.
No early voting results will be released by anyone until all the polls in a given state are closed.
Because the actual votes are going to start coming in, I am going to remove this article soon to prevent confusion.
All was quiet here in Louisville, thankfully. The only poll watchers were 3 policemen, who are nice and that I've known before!!!
CLOSING THIS ARTICLE