Liberals Shame Mike Pence For Not Dining Alone With Women Or Attending Events With Alcohol Without His Wife
Say what you want about Mike Pence’s policies.
He’s a good man. I don’t think anyone doubts that.
Well, I shouldn’t say that. Liberals doubt it.
In fact, liberals are mad at him right now for an absurd reason.
Wow. Imagine that!
From Townhall:
Clearly, she was trying to suggest Pence was out of the mainstream and represented a backwards way of thinking – and liberals took the bait.
You have to be really not smart to make a comparison between Pence respecting his wife and Sharia.
That makes you either unintelligent or insanely partisan. Either way. Not good.
It just goes to show you how clueless people are these days about religion and basic decency.
That’s a nice thing for Pence to do and the left is so detached from that kind of humility and respect that they don’t know what to do.
So they mock him. That seems to be their go-to move.
Sad…
Exactly.
http://www.youngcons.com/liberals-shame-mike-pence-for-not-dining-alone-with-women-or-attending-events-with-alcohol-without-his-wife/
He’s a good man. I don’t think anyone doubts that.
Well, I shouldn’t say that. Liberals doubt it.
In fact, liberals are mad at him right now for an absurd reason.
Wow. Imagine that!
From Townhall:
Clearly, she was trying to suggest Pence was out of the mainstream and represented a backwards way of thinking – and liberals took the bait.
You have to be really not smart to make a comparison between Pence respecting his wife and Sharia.
That makes you either unintelligent or insanely partisan. Either way. Not good.
It just goes to show you how clueless people are these days about religion and basic decency.
That’s a nice thing for Pence to do and the left is so detached from that kind of humility and respect that they don’t know what to do.
So they mock him. That seems to be their go-to move.
Sad…
Exactly.
http://www.youngcons.com/liberals-shame-mike-pence-for-not-dining-alone-with-women-or-attending-events-with-alcohol-without-his-wife/
Tags
Who is online
81 visitors
Oh, I don't find fault. It is pretty dam well smart to me.
I agree. He is smart and a devoted husband/family man. Our next President too.
Within the next several months most likely.
hahahahaha - Randy! I don't think that's what X meant.
LOL! I don't either, but it's still most likely...
Or Attending Events With Alcohol Without His Wife
Given the choice between attending any event with alcohol-- or-- attending with Pence's wife-- it seems pretty obvious which of those two alternatives any sane person would choose, eh?
Wow. Yet another progressive cheap shot at a conservative woman.
Your highly developed sense of humour...never ceases to amaze!
We have A President who may be involved in collusion with a hostile foreign power … and you post this stupid shit from young cons …
What is wrong with your perspective?
Pence may have more to worry about than pleasing tight-ass religionists … there's no way he didn't know how Micheal Flynn could be compromised by his dealings with foreign governments since Sally Yates brought it to the White House's attention 17 days prior to Flynn being fired! The "Flynn lied to Pence" butt-covering "reason-for-Flynn's-firing" is b.s.!
you post this stupid shit from young cons …
Diversionary tactic.
And yet a liberal here has created a seed to shame him on this matter, even saying his position is illegal. Progressives hate family values.
We have A President who may be involved in collusion with a hostile foreign power …
Excuse me Sir, but I know how easy it can be to get all wrapped up in believing something and according to the people in the know, such as Clapper, Comey and that other guy they have still not found any evidence to make that true.
Now the way I see it, some things are not that difficult to make up..... Take Comey saying Hillary hasn't done anything to be charged with after the Russian trolls spread the news she destroyed States evidence after it was subpoenaed.
We have A President who may be involved in collusion with a hostile foreign power …
Excuse me Sir, but I know how easy it can be to get all wrapped up in believing something and according to the people in the know, such as Clapper, Comey and that other guy they have still not found any evidence to make that true.
No … you excuse me … talk about "believing something and according to people in the know" … you and others sucked up every bit of crap from RUSSIAN FAKE NEWS…
Russia had the capacity to influence key precincts in swing states with fake news-disseminating bots during the 2016 presidential election, and could still be disrupting American politics, experts said Thursday in the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence’s first public Russia hearing .
Russia had every ability to create fake social media accounts by mimicking profiles of voters in key election states and precincts in the 2016 election, and use a mix of bots and real people to push propaganda from state-controlled media outlets like Russia Today (RT) and Sputnik, cybersecurity experts told the Senate panel Thursday . Clinton Watts, a senior fellow at the Center for Cyber and Homeland Security at The George Washington University, said many social accounts during the election pushing questionable news looked just like real voters in states like Wisconsin and Michigan.
And while conservative call liberals who want health insurance for its citizens … "COMMUNISTS" … they look the other way when COMMUNIST #1 steals a POTUS ELECTION for his stooge, Donald Trump.
Now the way I see it, some things are not that difficult to make up..... Take Comey saying Hillary hasn't done anything to be charged with after the Russian trolls spread the news she destroyed States evidence after it was subpoenaed.
As usual, you mischaracterize that matter … it ultimately came down to a 99 year old standard that required "intent" to benefit a foreign, hostile power. A stupid move on Clinton's part was just that … stupid … but unlike what the Trump campaign and administration may be facing, there was no intent on Clinton's part.
I have to admit, the Russians know how to play the zeal-without-knowledge Americans.
Frightening!
You are missing an essential point, Mac...
For "some people", it is perfectly OK for the Russians to interfere in American politics, as long as the Russians help "some people's" agenda.
What characteristic of the Putin regime would put off Trump loyalists? Make a list of Putin's salient characteristics. They are all admirable in Trump loyalists' eyes.
Fake news did not change result of 2016 election: study
Actually, neither Bob or AMAC got the point. Anytime evidence is subpoenaed and then is destroyed, it is a chargeable offense. I'm surprised AMAC doesn't know this. Talk about intent when Hillary's people either refused to testify or used the 5th continuously, destroying hard drives, lying to Congress and the American people.
Now in contrast to that all of these Trump people have been wanting to go before Congress, but Flynn remembers Scutor Libbey and what the Democrats did to him, so he would be a fool to not ask for immunity dealing with a Lynch mob like the Democrats, something that distinguishes them from any other group.
I'm surprised AMAC seems to think this has anything to do with any hacking connection between Trump and the Russians. ANY decent attorney woul suggest he ask for immunity or they find some thing else to give them an excuse to Lynch him.
It's that time......
Hey!
I agree. It's time to think about moving on. The left has pretty much taken the place over.
buh bye -
In other words, discussion is not your objective; rather it's to make pronouncements and declarations, most of them editorialized demagoguery and hatred, most of it falsehoods, misrepresentations and outright lies.
And by "taking over the site," what you mean is that you can't badger, denigrate and insult your way to control.
You are the Trumpians whether you voted for him or not.
And you are way too thin-skinned and insecure to be posting the crap you post.
Fake News Did Not Change Result Of 2016 Election: Study
Actually, neither Bob or AMAC got the point. Anytime evidence is subpoenaed and then is destroyed, it is a chargeable offense. I'm surprised AMAC doesn't know this. Talk about intent when Hillary's people either refused to testify or used the 5th continuously, destroying hard drives, lying to Congress and the American people.
Clinton’s staff had requested the emails to be deleted months before the subpoena, according to the FBI’s August 2016 report. Moreover, there’s no evidence Clinton deleted the emails in anticipation of the subpoena, and FBI director James B. Comey has said his agency’s investigation found no evidence that any work-related emails were “intentionally deleted in an effort to conceal them.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2016/live-updates/general-election/real-time-fact-checking-and-analysis-of-the-final-2016-presidential-debate/fact-check-trumps-claim-clinton-destroyed-emails-after-getting-a-subpoena-from-congress/?utm_term=.103c401b3 8a5
Now in contrast to that all of these Trump people have been wanting to go before Congress, but Flynn remembers Scutor Libbey and what the Democrats did to him, so he would be a fool to not ask for immunity dealing with a Lynch mob like the Democrats, something that distinguishes them from any other group.
I'm surprised AMAC seems to think this has anything to do with any hacking connection between Trump and the Russians. ANY decent attorney woul suggest he ask for immunity or they find some thing else to give them an excuse to Lynch him.
My comment about Russian interference is in conjunction with your selectivity (and that of others), to accept as gospel all that referred to Clinton, but as "fake" with regard to Trump.
Your surprise is based on flawed understanding.
YOUR linked article represents as conclusive, that which is nebulous, and, which because of its very nebulosity, can not be quantified nor substantiated.
United States v. Libby was the federal trial of I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby , a former high-ranking official in the George W. Bush administration , for interfering with special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald 's criminal investigation of the Plame affair .
Libby served as Assistant to the President under George W. Bush and Chief of Staff to the Vice President of the United States and Assistant to the Vice President for National Security Affairs under Dick Cheney from 2001 to 2005. Libby resigned from his government positions hours after his indictment on October 28, 2005.
Libby was indicted by a federal grand jury on five felony counts of making false statements to federal investigators, perjury for lying to a federal grand jury, and obstruction of justice for impeding the course of a federal grand jury investigation concerned with the possibly illegal leaking by government officials of the classified identity of a covert agent of the CIA , Valerie Plame Wilson , the wife of former Ambassador Joseph C. Wilson IV . Pursuant to the grand jury leak investigation, Libby was convicted on March 6, 2007, on four counts of perjury, obstruction of justice, and making false statements. He was acquitted of one count of making false statements.
Libby was sentenced to 30 months in prison and fined $250,000. The sentence was commuted in June 2007 by President Bush, voiding the prison term. The convictions still stand on the record.
Ironically, FITZGERALD WAS APPOINTED BY GEORGE W. BUSH!
_______________________________________________
I never bluff, Six; I do my homework and state myself clearly and unambiguously.
My point, which you didn't get was he perjured himself. He should have taken the 5th like all the Democrats do.
Fake News Did Not Change Result Of 2016 Election: Study
A few hundred thousand votes in certain key states decided the election. That is quarter of one percent of the national votes cast (300,000/120,000,000 = .025 ).
For anyone to say that the fake news of, say , Hillary Clinton's "illnesses", could not have swayed 1 out of every 400 voters is on thin ice, imo. Then there is the matter of the accumulation of fake news stories detrimental to Clinton. Infowars was pumping them out on a daily basis there for a while.
There is just no way to be definitive about this, and I think the university studies were an exercise in futility.
So totally off topic and a major league yuge derail. Please delete this off topic crap from my seed.
Now what was this seed about?
I think it was about a little boy who is afraid of women. His mother must have done some gawd awful things to him for him to hate women so much and be so a-scared of'em.
Tell it to your cohort ...
When they post an item that needs to be addressed, when you whine because some of our members feel the need for discussion in a discussion forum, you probably aren't temperamentally suited to be here.
Or what about President Obama – whose use of sanctimonious lectures about “our values” were perhaps both the most successful and most eye-rolling examples of the art we shall ever see – badgering Americans about accepting thousands of unvetted refugees from some of the most terror-ridden nations on Earth: “Slamming the door in the face of refugees would betray our deepest values?”
Nor does Alinsky call for the overuse of profanity that one hears so often from the Left, especially from their political philosophers/comedians like Bill Maher and Jon Stewart.
Even if it is not Alinksy’s rule book, there obviously is one, and DNC Chair Tom Perez has clearly studied it.
As reported by the Daily Caller:
Most of these edifying remarks can be heard on the video below.
Clearly the DNC found someone who can deliver what they have become accustomed to there.
Trending Today
While I'm all for being close to, preferring the company of, and respecting one's spouse above all others - what is this silliness? Does Pence not trust himself in the company of a woman while dining in public view? Perhaps he thinks he is so irresistible that random women will throw themselves on him, or perhaps he has no more self-control than his superior.
Perhaps it's all of the above, which makes him both incredibly egotistical and incredibly insecure.
Makes him smart. Just think of all the women Bill Clinton didn't rape or have affairs with, but those Russian trolls spread false news like wildfire that he did all those things. If he had eaten with Hillary instead of Monica he probably would be clean as the wind driven snow today.
Pence's adherence to the "Billy Graham rule" is in fact worthy of notice. Apparently he assumes that if left alone with a woman -- any woman -- either he would rape her or she would rape him.
There are real-world consequences: he will not meet a female (staffer, Congresswoman, CEO, minister, whatever) without the presence of a third party. OMG! UK Prime Minister Theresa May is a woman! Run for the hills!
Relations between men and women do not have to be determined by a presumption of rape...
Apparently he assumes that if left alone with a woman -- any woman -- either he would rape her or she would rape him.
You must be talking about Bill Clinton.
No. I am not talking about a President from decades ago. I am talking about the current Vice-President.
You know:
TODAY'S NEWS
This makes me nervous that Pence has so little self restraint or self control that just being in a room with other women could trigger something in him that he may attack or grab some woman's pussy unless his wife was there to deter it.
It does answer the question of why Donald Trump picked Mike Pence as his Vice President. Mike is clearly in the club that has little respect for women. Whether it's consciously or unconsciously but it's clear to me that Pence wants to be a pussy grabber.
Never trust a man who doesn't drink.
Q: Who's the "pussy grabber"?
Q: Who's the "pussy grabber"?
I don't know but when you find him let me know.
This is a much to do about nothing... except for one thing. From this very article:
Which is real issue here.
To cite a few people who take umbrage with his personal beliefs and make it about "all liberals" is disingenuous. I have an issue with that.
Exactly.
And he is not alone. There are Congressmen who follow the same "Billy Graham rule".
Same here, Perrie!
If he will not dine with a woman alone, or attend any function where alcohol is being served unless his wife is there could be commendable to some-- but in DC, that's how you get business done. It makes me wonder if he feels, deep down, that women are evil and going to take advantage of him, or somehow sabotage his sincere efforts to govern. If I were Mrs. Pence, I'd be getting awfully tired of babysitting his conscience.
This whole "Women are evil" thing really bothers me.
You have to consider who is complaining about his rule and do we really know it is his rule? Have you actually heard him say this? You know some people still think MSM are telling them the truth and don't have an agenda.
Pence is merely pandering to the tight-ass religionists who vote their biases and religion.
Let Pence show his sincerity by denouncing the misogynous, disrespectful treatment of women.
Damned hypocrites!
Exactly.