High School Censors Pro-Life Club: Too ‘Controversial,’ ‘Political’
A high school in Allentown, Pennsylvania has received a demand letter from the Thomas More Society on behalf of students who claim they were denied permission to form a pro-life club at the school.
According to Students for Life of America, last fall senior Elizabeth Castro and junior Grace Schaier applied for a pro-life club at Parkland High School using the standard process. When the original required faculty adviser withdrew, the students found another adviser and submitted their application, only to be verbally denied by the assistant principal, who claimed the pro-life group would be too “political” and “controversial.”
CuckooMallUSA
CuckooMallUSA
The official Cuckoo Mall in United States. We sell kitchenwares to housewares products...
APPLY NOW
Castro subsequently sent an email to the assistant principal, noting that other groups – such as the Gay Straight Alliance, the Multi-Cultural Leadership Club, the Political Science Club, and the Fashion Club – were also in existence, but received no response.
“We met all the requirements of Parkland High School to start a club at the school and were denied simply because we are pro-life,” said Castro. “The school is not only denying my right to start a group but denying the opportunity for others at my school to learn about the greatest human rights social injustice of our time.”
advertisement
Castro says the purpose of the club is to “create a life-affirming culture at our school, educate our peers on the issue of life, hold diaper drives to support pregnant and parenting students, and become a voice for those who cannot speak for themselves.”
A demand letter from the Thomas More Society to Parkland High School principal James E. Moniz II, assistant principal Jude Sandt, and superintendent Richard T. Sniscak states:
Parkland High School’s refusal to permit Elizabeth and Grace to create a pro-life club constitutes a violation of their rights under both the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and the federal Equal Access Act (“EAA”). Additionally, this denial violates Parkland School District’s own policies regarding student organizations.
“Students do not shed their First Amendment rights at the school house gate,” the letter continues. “Accordingly, a school may not permit some students to organize and express themselves on particular topics while forbidding others the same right—this creates an atmosphere where only ‘approved’ speech is permitted and violates the First Amendment as a content-based restriction.”
advertisement
“There is absolutely no question that the law protects the right of these students to form this club at their high school,” says Jocelyn Floyd, Thomas More Society special counsel, in a statement. “This administration’s denial of a pro-life club is especially surprising, because this district’s policy expressly allows students to form clubs with ‘any lawful objective.’”
Students for Life of America president Kristan Hawkins says her organization has often experienced schools putting up “unnecessary and unconstitutional obstacles” when students attempt to start pro-life clubs.
“The school’s baseless claim that the club would be too ‘controversial’ and ‘political’ is a common excuse we hear,” she adds. “And it’s always infringing on the First Amendment rights of pro-life students, treating them as second-class citizens because they happen to want to educate their peers on the horrors of abortion and help pregnant and parenting students at their school.”
advertisement
The letter from Thomas More Society demands that Parkland High School immediately approve the application for the Students for Life club. http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/05/18/high-school-censors-pro-life-club-too-controversial-political/
According to Students for Life of America, last fall senior Elizabeth Castro and junior Grace Schaier applied for a pro-life club at Parkland High School using the standard process. When the original required faculty adviser withdrew, the students found another adviser and submitted their application, only to be verbally denied by the assistant principal, who claimed the pro-life group would be too “political” and “controversial.”
CuckooMallUSA
CuckooMallUSA
The official Cuckoo Mall in United States. We sell kitchenwares to housewares products...
APPLY NOW
Castro subsequently sent an email to the assistant principal, noting that other groups – such as the Gay Straight Alliance, the Multi-Cultural Leadership Club, the Political Science Club, and the Fashion Club – were also in existence, but received no response.
“We met all the requirements of Parkland High School to start a club at the school and were denied simply because we are pro-life,” said Castro. “The school is not only denying my right to start a group but denying the opportunity for others at my school to learn about the greatest human rights social injustice of our time.”
advertisement
Castro says the purpose of the club is to “create a life-affirming culture at our school, educate our peers on the issue of life, hold diaper drives to support pregnant and parenting students, and become a voice for those who cannot speak for themselves.”
A demand letter from the Thomas More Society to Parkland High School principal James E. Moniz II, assistant principal Jude Sandt, and superintendent Richard T. Sniscak states:
Parkland High School’s refusal to permit Elizabeth and Grace to create a pro-life club constitutes a violation of their rights under both the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and the federal Equal Access Act (“EAA”). Additionally, this denial violates Parkland School District’s own policies regarding student organizations.
“Students do not shed their First Amendment rights at the school house gate,” the letter continues. “Accordingly, a school may not permit some students to organize and express themselves on particular topics while forbidding others the same right—this creates an atmosphere where only ‘approved’ speech is permitted and violates the First Amendment as a content-based restriction.”
advertisement
“There is absolutely no question that the law protects the right of these students to form this club at their high school,” says Jocelyn Floyd, Thomas More Society special counsel, in a statement. “This administration’s denial of a pro-life club is especially surprising, because this district’s policy expressly allows students to form clubs with ‘any lawful objective.’”
Students for Life of America president Kristan Hawkins says her organization has often experienced schools putting up “unnecessary and unconstitutional obstacles” when students attempt to start pro-life clubs.
“The school’s baseless claim that the club would be too ‘controversial’ and ‘political’ is a common excuse we hear,” she adds. “And it’s always infringing on the First Amendment rights of pro-life students, treating them as second-class citizens because they happen to want to educate their peers on the horrors of abortion and help pregnant and parenting students at their school.”
advertisement
The letter from Thomas More Society demands that Parkland High School immediately approve the application for the Students for Life club. http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/05/18/high-school-censors-pro-life-club-too-controversial-political/
Tags
Who is online
94 visitors
More ideological intolerance. Given the recent outbreaks of liberal violence, the school is probably running scared.
The first amendment rights of traditional values conservative students in public schools often get trampled upon.
OK this is a bogus story.
Most schools do not allow the discussion of abortion in sex ed, end of story. If you can't discuss abortion, you can't discuss pro life.
As a matter of fact, in some states, there is legislation to teach that abortion is murder.
In the NYC schools, I as a sex ed teacher, was forbidden to teach about either abortion or pro life. The reasoning is that both are specific POV's and that sex ed was only to teach bodily changes, reproduction, health risks, and both contraception and abstinence. They were also forced to take care of an electronic baby for 48 hours, to show them how hard it is to take care of a child, in the hope that they would take care not to get pregnant.
No conservative rights are being trampled on. If anything, the legislations has gone both ways and usually more towards the conservative side.
I don't think there should be any politically oriented clubs in high schools. They are there to learn, not be activists.
Political activity can take place outside of school.
I'm pretty sure that activism is already present in schools.
I don't think that applies. They wanted to start a club not change the curriculum.
Exactly. An after school club meeting under the equal access laws has nothing to do with curriculum.
How can they have a Gay Straight alliance club yet ban a pro-life club on the basis that one is political and controversial while the other is not? Either ban both or permit both. Otherwise sue the school system for violating the students' first amendment rights.
It's a student school club. Has nothing to do with what teachers can or can't say in class. Under the Supreme Court ruling from the Reagan era involving equal access, these students should be permitted their club. Period. Like with religious clubs under equal access, the pro life club should be allowed or there should be no after school student clubs of any kind.