╌>

Trump Begins Demolition of Michelle’s Proudest Achievement

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  xxjefferson51  •  9 years ago  •  268 comments

Trump Begins Demolition of Michelle’s Proudest Achievement

President Donald Trump has been systematically dismantling the Obama administration’s legacy ever since he took office, and he’s showing no signs of slowing down.

Most recently, the Department of Agriculture finally announced that it would be rolling back some of former first lady Michelle Obama’s restrictions on what can be served in public school lunches, ABC News reported.

Effective July 1, after a period for public comment, schools will again be allowed to serve chocolate milk to students thanks to the lifting of some restrictions.

The USDA announced that it is also easing restrictions on sodium content, and allowing milk with one percent fat to be served in schools again.

“Schools need flexibility in menu planning so they can serve nutritious and appealing meals,” Agriculture Secretary Sonny Perdue explained.

TRENDING: Hillary Has Most Tone-Deaf Moment Ever: Lauer’s Fall Was Karma for Mistreating Me

“Schools want to offer food that students actually want to eat. It doesn’t do any good to serve nutritious meals if they wind up in the trash can,” he added.

Obama’s school lunches were arguably some of the most vile, disgusting things ever known to man, and thankfully the Trump administration is working on getting rid of them.

It’s taken a lot longer than expected, but we are finally seeing some progress in making sure our kids have meals they actually want to eat.

USA Today noted that this has upset some people who think that the easing of these regulations will lead to more obesity, and the eventual dismantling of Obama’s entire school lunch program.

Hate to break it to them, but parenting and personal responsibility are more important to combating obesity than the government ever could be.

Plus, I can’t think of many students who would be upset to see this program eliminated.

The Hill noted that the rollback of some of these regulations is also being touted as a cost-saving measure designed to aid school budgets.

“Based on the feedback we’ve gotten from students, schools, and food service professionals in local schools across America, it’s clear that many still face challenges incorporating some of the meal pattern requirements,” Perdue explained.

RELATED: Boycott: Top Clothing Company Founder Calls Trump, Conservatives Evil

Tastebuds across America can now rejoice knowing that the Obama-era disgusting school lunches are finally coming to an end.

These government-approved lunches didn’t help anything — except to provide great proof of why the government getting involved in every aspect of our lives is a bad idea.

Let’s hope the Trump administration will only continue to roll back the unnecessary regulations of the Obama administration.

H/T Breitbart            https://conservativetribune.com/trump-begins-demolition/


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
GaJenn78
Sophomore Silent
2  GaJenn78    9 years ago

I've eaten school lunches when I go have lunch with my daughters. They are gross and the amount of food being untouched and thrown away is crazy. It's a waste of money. I enjoyed lunches when I was in school. 

 
 
 
Spikegary
Junior Quiet
3  Spikegary    9 years ago

Why do we need the federal government to determine what our kids eat?  It doesn't take a village, it doesn't take Big Brother Government, it takes parents who decide on their children's diet.  My mom used to make lunch for my brothers and I and it was nutritious.

Why the federal government thinks it should mandate food is beyond me.

 
 
 
Willjay9
Freshman Silent
3.2  Willjay9  replied to  Spikegary @3    9 years ago
Why the federal government thinks it should mandate food is beyond me.

Maybe because the government never did.....It gave the schools guidelines regarding what foods to serve emphasizing more healthy and nutritious foods. It was basically up to the schools to implement a healthy menu. Unfortunately with cuts to education, some schools found it very hard to serve nutritious tasty meals with such small budgets.

 
 
 
Spikegary
Junior Quiet
3.2.2  Spikegary  replied to  Willjay9 @3.2    9 years ago

When I was in school as a kid, the hot meals were nutritious and balanced.  Not always delicious, but they had a real menu and that was the meal, not a bunch of optional stuff.

 
 
 
Rex Block
Freshman Silent
3.2.3  Rex Block  replied to  Tessylo @3.2.1    9 years ago
Unfortunately with cuts to education, some schools found it very hard to serve nutritious tasty meals with such small budgets.

What cuts? It doesn't take a large amount of money to create something the kids will eat.

 
 
 
Explorerdog
Freshman Silent
3.3  Explorerdog  replied to  Spikegary @3    9 years ago

Determine no, but a lot of kids have few if any options and they look like the butterballs their parents are. Round is a shape, but congestive heart failure in your twenties is not funny and a lot of these kids are well on their way.

 
 
 
Willjay9
Freshman Silent
4  Willjay9    9 years ago

Effective July 1, after a period for public comment, schools will again be allowed to serve chocolate milk to students thanks to the lifting of some restrictions.

The USDA announced that it is also easing restrictions on sodium content, and allowing milk with one percent fat to be served in schools again.

Sure they did it for the kids! More like dairy producers have been lobbying for years to get back into schools because in the past they have been their biggest consumers of flavored and one percent fat milk products! All Trump did was just toss another fat check into some corporation's pocket!

 
 
 
magnoliaave
Sophomore Silent
5  magnoliaave    9 years ago

Snack and soda vending machines are only in our high schools here. 

Macaroni and cheese; mashed potatoes; grilled cheese sandwiches are foods that get a student through the rest of the day.  It's a long time between breakfast and lunch and, then, when school is out the bus ride back home.  Students get a lot of exercise during the day. 

It isn't always what food one eats, but how much. 

 
 
 
GaJenn78
Sophomore Silent
5.1  GaJenn78  replied to  magnoliaave @5    9 years ago

Exactly the point I was trying to make. For some children, school lunch is their only meal. Kids can't learn if they are hungry. Our elementary and middle schools do "extras", which could be a cookie, ice cream, chips etc. They have to pay extra for those. If  the kids are getting an extra and not eating their hot lunch, then they aren't getting any nutrition anyway.

 
 
 
magnoliaave
Sophomore Silent
5.1.1  magnoliaave  replied to  GaJenn78 @5.1    9 years ago

And, that's it in a nutshell......students can't learn if they are hungry!

 
 
 
GaJenn78
Sophomore Silent
5.1.4  GaJenn78  replied to  Release The Kraken @5.1.2    9 years ago

My two oldest girls take their lunch everyday. My youngest daughter takes hers about 2-3 times a week because she has her favorites at school sometimes, like omelet day or cheese stuffed breadsticks day (I know, super nutritious LOL), or nacho day.

 
 
 
lennylynx
Sophomore Silent
5.1.5  lennylynx  replied to  Release The Kraken @5.1.2    9 years ago

" School lunches have always been a money losing enterprise."

I'm not even going to touch that statement.  Bad fishy. Sad

 
 
 
magnoliaave
Sophomore Silent
5.1.6  magnoliaave  replied to  Release The Kraken @5.1.2    9 years ago

Because a lot of children would have no lunch.

My grandchildren's parents pay for their lunches at school.  I paid for my boys' lunches at school even though most of the time I made their lunches.

All parents are not created equally. 

 
 
 
sandy-2021492
Professor Guide
5.1.8  sandy-2021492  replied to  magnoliaave @5.1.6    9 years ago
Because a lot of children would have no lunch.

Yup.  For a lot of kids, those school breakfasts and lunches are the only meals they'll get.

All the more reason they should be healthy - these kids' diets at home are probably deficient in quite a few vitamins and minerals.  Even if they're eating at home, they're likely not eating well.

As far as getting them through the day, the school system where I grew up allows unlimited servings of veggies, because some, especially student athletes, complained of being hungry before school let out.  There are solutions that work with the guidelines - we just need to implement them.  But that school system actually listened to parents and kids, and came up with a workable solution instead of just shutting them down.

 
 
 
magnoliaave
Sophomore Silent
5.1.9  magnoliaave  replied to  sandy-2021492 @5.1.8    9 years ago

Such a great idea about more helpings.

 
 
 
sandy-2021492
Professor Guide
5.1.10  sandy-2021492  replied to  magnoliaave @5.1.9    9 years ago

I thought so, too.

 
 
 
Explorerdog
Freshman Silent
5.1.11  Explorerdog  replied to  Texan1211 @5.1.3    9 years ago

Red states prove that every day.

 
 
 
Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו
Junior Quiet
5.1.13  Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו  replied to  Texan1211 @5.1.12    9 years ago
idiotic comment.

Translation:  "don't have a good comeback for that one."

 
 
 
Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו
Junior Quiet
5.1.15  Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו  replied to  Texan1211 @5.1.14    9 years ago
I feel bad you can't understand.

Awww, really?  crying  

 
 
 
Explorerdog
Freshman Silent
5.1.17  Explorerdog  replied to  Texan1211 @5.1.12    9 years ago

Truth hurts check the stats on the welfare states, blues support red takes, educated comment. suck it up! 

 
 
 
Willjay9
Freshman Silent
5.1.19  Willjay9  replied to  Release The Kraken @5.1.2    9 years ago
Why not get rid of school lunch entirely and make it the responsibility of the parent to send lunch with their child to school? 

So what happens to the families who are barely providing ONE meal a day for their children? What's the solution then? Let the poor and unfortunate kids go hungry until they get home? Or just not send them to school until the parents have enough money to buy more food?

School lunches have always been a money losing enterprise.

When has it ever been designed as a money making enterprise?!

 
 
 
GaJenn78
Sophomore Silent
5.1.20  GaJenn78  replied to  Willjay9 @5.1.19    9 years ago

I agree with this. I also don't understand why they dropped the 1%milk at schools, that's lower fat. A lot of elementary school kids should really still be drinking whole or 2% milk. The fat in the milk is good for their growing brains. If I'm missing something please let me know about the milk thing.

 
 
 
Jasper2529
Professor Quiet
5.1.21  Jasper2529  replied to  GaJenn78 @5.1.20    9 years ago
A lot of elementary school kids should really still be drinking whole or 2% milk. The fat in the milk is good for their growing brains.

Unless things have dramatically changed since my children were young, pediatricians were fine with children drinking 2% milk after age 2. They didn't need to go to a lower percentage.

I don't know about milk helping human brains, but I do know that calcium and Vitamin D are vital to the health of our bones, teeth, and hair.

The key is for children to be physically active, eat healthful homemade real food (not packaged/processed) meals, and not be allowed to be couch potatoes. This is what it seems too many of today's parents ignore.

 
 
 
GaJenn78
Sophomore Silent
5.1.22  GaJenn78  replied to  Jasper2529 @5.1.21    9 years ago

I think I was responding because someone earlier stated or complained that 1% milk was back due to dairy lobbyist. Oh! And chocolate milk(1%) was coming back

 
 
 
lennylynx
Sophomore Silent
5.1.23  lennylynx  replied to  GaJenn78 @5.1.22    9 years ago

Chocolate milk comes from brown cows!

 
 
 
GaJenn78
Sophomore Silent
5.1.24  GaJenn78  replied to  Jasper2529 @5.1.21    9 years ago

Thank you for the explanation :-).  I think I was told after formula or breast milk to keep them on whole milk because of the milk fat, it was good for their brains. After a certain age then 2% was fine. Of course, my oldest girl is now 17 but the baby is a little small for her age so I try to keep 2% in the house instead of 1%. I call her the baby, but she's 11 LOL 

 
 
 
Explorerdog
Freshman Silent
5.2  Explorerdog  replied to  magnoliaave @5    9 years ago

Yeah a video game will wear you out!

 
 
 
Jasper2529
Professor Quiet
9  Jasper2529    9 years ago

Reading some of the comments has made me laugh, because the pro-Michelle tofu crowd has repeatedly brought up the same ridiculous talking points for years:

  • Fresh food is more expensive than processed or fast food. FALSE.
  • Kids loved Michelle Obama's guidelines. FALSE.
  • Students who didn't eat the school food are spoiled brats. FALSE.
  • It takes a lot of time to prepare and cook fresh, wholesome meals. FALSE.

Don't worry, Michelle-folks. A little more sodium and some fake chocolate in 1% milk isn't going to make a dent in childhood obesity. During all of Michelle's years, childhood obesity didn't go down because of her tofu lunches, so a minor increase in sodium won't matter. If you're worried about your kids, send them to school with a delicious a tofu and kale salad (no dressing).

What today's  kids need is more physical activity and parental guidance ... not tofu, kale, and the US government.

 
 
 
Explorerdog
Freshman Silent
9.1  Explorerdog  replied to  Jasper2529 @9    9 years ago

Run inside kids and enjoy your moon pie lunch, there exercise and nutrition at the same time. trumpism in action.

 
 
 
Jasper2529
Professor Quiet
9.1.1  Jasper2529  replied to  Explorerdog @9.1    9 years ago
Run inside kids and enjoy your moon pie lunch, there exercise and nutrition at the same time.

I had to look up what a moon pie is. It looks disgusting and very fattening. Have you ever thought that many parents give their children fresh fruits and vegetables for snacks? That's what my wife and I gave our children when they were in school. What they eat now that they're adults is their own responsibility.

trumpism in action.

What a judgemental and ridiculous comment.

 
 
 
Willjay9
Freshman Silent
9.2  Willjay9  replied to  Jasper2529 @9    9 years ago
Fresh food is more expensive than processed or fast food. FALSE.

Really? Which costs more a can of corn or an ear of corn, canned green beans or bushel of fresh green beans? Canned peaches or fresh peaches? Ground beef or processed hamburger patties?

Kids loved Michelle Obama's guidelines. FALSE.

Who claimed that?.......

Students who didn't eat the school food are spoiled brats. FALSE.

Why aren't they? Would you have accepted your child throwing away perfectly good food just because they don't like it? And if you did accept it did you let them complain about being hungry after they did?

It takes a lot of time to prepare and cook fresh, wholesome meals. FALSE

Once again who claimed that?

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
11  JohnRussell    9 years ago

If Melania Trump advocated mandatory healthy lunches for schoolkids the Trumpsters would be all for it.

The opposition was always based on hatred of Michelle Obama, aka , generally speaking, racism.

 
 
 
lennylynx
Sophomore Silent
11.2  lennylynx  replied to  JohnRussell @11    9 years ago

The insane attacks on Michelle Obama were the best evidence of the irrational and personal hatred the right wing scum had/have for the Obamas.  NO first lady ever got attacked the way she did, who attacks the President's wife like that even if they think the president himself is horrible?  I don't remember any left wingers calling Barbara Bush fat and ugly.  

The treatment of the Obamas followed by the election of Trump has proved that the civil rights movement did little to change hearts.  Those who would have denied those rights are angry and bitter to this day that they were granted.

 
 
 
Jasper2529
Professor Quiet
11.3  Jasper2529  replied to  JohnRussell @11    9 years ago

If Melania Trump advocated mandatory healthy lunches for schoolkids the Trumpsters would be all for it.

Melania Trump has never appeared  to be a woman who would want the US government to "mandate" what American children eat in school, but your comment is quite a funny fantasy.  

The opposition was always based on hatred of Michelle Obama, aka , generally speaking, racism.

Oooo ... the hate and race cards rise again. Bravo!! The more people use them, the less value they have when real hatred and racism appear.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
12  CB    9 years ago

It is a shame before God that the children of God can be so petty, small, and given to negativity.  Woe, to those men and women-whomever they be-who speak evil of good.

"Obama’s school lunches were arguably some of the most vile, disgusting things ever known to man, and thankfully the Trump administration is working on getting rid of them." 

This is hyperbole and unworthy of publication. Why demonize food?

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Expert
13  Kavika     9 years ago

America Tops List of 10 Most Obese Countries

The obesity epidemic continues to plague not only America, but the rest of the world as well.

?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.beam.usnews.com%

By Amir Khan , Staff Writer|May 28, 2014, at 7:00 p.m.

America Tops List of 10 Most Obese Countries

America takes the cake as the most obese country, but more than 2 billion people are overweight or obese around the world. (iStockPhoto)

America's waistline  continues to expand , according to a study published today in The Lancet. The obesity epidemic remains the biggest public health issue facing the country, and despite awareness of the need to get in shape, more than a third of the country is now obese.

But it's not just America – much of the developed world has seen similar increases, according to the study. India and China together make up 15 percent of the world’s obese population, and in Colombia, Costa Rica and Mexico, the  obesity rate  is upward of 57 percent for men and 65 percent for women. Worldwide, the number of overweight and obese people increased from 857 million in 1980 to 2.1 billion in 2013 – an increase of more than 145 percent.

More than half of the 671 million obese people in the world live in 10 countries, and America tops the list.

Top 10 Most Obese Countries:

1. United States 
2. China
3. India
4. Russia
5. Brazil
6. Mexico
7. Egypt
8. Germany
9. Pakistan
10. Indonesia

Just how bad has it gotten in the U.S.? Check out the infographic below.



 
 
 
Colour Me Free
Senior Silent
14  Colour Me Free    9 years ago

Just a thought:

Obesity in America is not going to be solved via school lunches that taste like cardboard!  Or by providing pizza for school lunch.

Want to find a solution to childhood obesity - start educating young people on how to make menus, how to shop and then how to cook.  Food is expensive, I get that - yet it also takes a bit of initiative to make a good meal that does not have to cost a lot... opening a box is easier, but not necessarily cheaper and most likely not good for you.

A frozen bag of mixed veggies, a cheap cut of beef, pork or chicken, noodles/potatoes and broth/gravy mix ... I can make a nice hearty stew very inexpensively.

P.s.. my baby is now 17 ... I get up early enough every morning to toast him a bagel/peanut butter and/or jelly toast for breakfast .. also make him a lunch every morning.  As adults and parents, it is 'we' that should be providing the lessons at home!

P.s... he can do it all by himself - I have taught him how to shop.. cook and handle money ... I enjoy preparing things for my family .. he will be off to college soon - cannot pamper him there!

Done preaching now!

 
 
 
magnoliaave
Sophomore Silent
15  magnoliaave    9 years ago

What I am seeing in my part of the Country are obese women.  Not school children and men, but women.  Don't know why!

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
15.1  CB  replied to  magnoliaave @15    9 years ago

Magnoliaave, the former First Lady "spoke" to the issues of obesity in all quarters of the nation, not just a specific locale. As will similarly be the case in whatever it is the current First Lady Melania Trump decides is her national cause.

 
 
 
Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו
Junior Quiet
15.1.1  Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו  replied to  CB @15.1    9 years ago
whatever it is Melania Trump decides is her national cause.

It's supposed to be bullying and, yes, the paradox there is suffocatingly obvious. 

 
 
 
Jasper2529
Professor Quiet
15.1.2  Jasper2529  replied to  Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו @15.1.1    9 years ago
It's supposed to be bullying and, yes, the paradox there is suffocatingly obvious.

And cyber-bullying. Given the fact that too many children have committed suicide due to bullying and cyber-bullying that their schools ignored for over a decade, I feel that these are very relevant topics for the 21st century and worthy of a First Lady's attention.  

By the way -- Except for photo ops where she appeared with select children, Michelle Obama's White House garden was taken care of by the National Parks Service. Or, do you think she went out there early every morning to pull weeds and do the watering? Also, her daughters weren't subjected to the same crappy food she advocated for poor and middle class children. They had gourmet menus and snacks while other kids were told to eat tofu and kale or go hungry.

I'll never forget the news stories about very little children whose healthy lunches (baked turkey on whole wheat bread, apple, real fruit juice) from home were taken away from them and they were given a couple of fried chicken nuggets instead.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
15.1.3  CB  replied to  Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו @15.1.1    9 years ago

Yes.  Now that's royally rich.

 
 
 
Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו
Junior Quiet
15.1.5  Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו  replied to  Jasper2529 @15.1.2    9 years ago
I'll never forget the news stories about very little children whose healthy lunches (baked turkey on whole wheat bread, apple, real fruit juice) from home were taken away from them and they were given a couple of fried chicken nuggets instead.

Apparently there's a lot of that kind of BS which never happened that you'll  never forget.  Thanks for dumping your Breitbart filth Jasper.  Now someone's got to clean up your stinking mess.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
15.1.6  Trout Giggles  replied to  Tessylo @15.1.4    9 years ago

Some of those kids never grow out of bullying as we see here every day

 
 
 
Jasper2529
Professor Quiet
15.1.7  Jasper2529  replied to  Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו @15.1.5    9 years ago

Apparently there's a lot of that kind of BS which never happened that you'll  never forget.  Thanks for dumping your Breitbart filth Jasper.  Now someone's got to clean up your stinking mess.

Such a hateful and hostile comment, Atheist. Here are 3 of many articles, and none of them are Breitbart or remotely right wing. You should do some research before personally attacking people.

ABC News ...

NPR ...

Carolina Journal ...

Last, but not least ... "right wing" NYT ...

“I lost a million dollars that first year the regulations took place,” said Betti Wiggins, executive director of Detroit Public Schools’ Office of Nutrition. Now, thanks to C.E.P. as well as eliminating choices of entrees in lower grades and cycling her menus more often (12 days versus 20 days) to control inventory, her department is back in the black. And kids are starting to come around to reformulated entrees like three-bean vegetarian chili with cornbread and low-fat breaded chicken patties.

“This is an obesity crisis,’’ she said, “and we’ve gotten rid of health classes and P.E., so we’re back to the lunch lady and the tray.”

BUT many experts in taste preferences say starting at school age may be too late. Research indicates that the critical period for broadening the palate is the   first two years . “It’s harder to change preferences than to form them,” said Leann Birch, a development psychologist at the University of Georgia in Athens. “The reality is kids learn to eat what their parents eat, and if kids are getting something different at school, then it’s not surprising they aren’t eating it.”

 
 
 
Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו
Junior Quiet
15.1.8  Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו  replied to  Jasper2529 @15.1.7    9 years ago

Thanks so much for those links which happen to prove that your comment that lunches "were taken away from them" was false so that must have come from some rightwing scum site (or did you make it up yourself?).  Also the lunch you described as what the mother sent was really a school lunch--did you not see the tray it was in. Your first link just indicates that the oreos were sent home, not confiscated but sent home. So, again, thanks for not even reading (or being unable to understand your own links) and then handing them to me to debunk the lies. 

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
15.1.9  Trout Giggles  replied to  Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו @15.1.8    9 years ago

wow...good job, Atheist!

 
 
 
Jasper2529
Professor Quiet
15.1.10  Jasper2529  replied to  Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו @15.1.8    9 years ago

Thanks for the cherry-picking what you want to see instead of what was really there. 

 
 
 
magnoliaave
Sophomore Silent
16  magnoliaave    9 years ago

If this was Mrs. Obama's proudest moment, I am very sad.  She doesn't get another opportunity.  Perhaps, she should have tried it out first on her children.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
16.1  CB  replied to  magnoliaave @16    9 years ago

Mrs. Obama has nothing to apologize for anyway. Either the nation can appreciate her efforts to help out or just leave first ladies out of the own scheme of running the country from now on. I do not see state governor spouses having "obligatory" causes foisted or hoisted, as the case may be, upon them! What is this critical spirit?

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
16.2  MrFrost  replied to  magnoliaave @16    9 years ago

Hey, maybe Melania can show kids how to poll dance or put on a condom... Much better than eating healthy.. [eye roll]

 
 
 
Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו
Junior Quiet
16.3  Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו  replied to  magnoliaave @16    9 years ago
If this was Mrs. Obama's proudest moment, I am very sad.  She doesn't get another opportunity.  Perhaps, she should have tried it out first on her children.

You're not "very sad."  You're not sad at all.  If anything you apparently take pleasure trying to tear down someone who's your superior in every way.  Just what peculiar branch of "Christianity" do you follow?

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
16.4  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  magnoliaave @16    9 years ago
Perhaps, she should have tried it out first on her children.

Come one.  When has a politician EVER made themselves subject to what clusterfucks they push on the rest of the country.  They did it with the ACA, why should this be any different?

 
 
 
magnoliaave
Sophomore Silent
17  magnoliaave    9 years ago

Who even mentioned she owed an apology?

I have causes.  I formed a foundation for special needs children in my County.  No big hoopla for anyone other than me and those who joined in fund raising. 

If first ladies whether they are national, statewide, local or whatever don't have the heart to do It, then, they shouldn't.  There are those of us who don't do it for recognition.

Usually, these ladies who have husbands who are politically or socially  connected already have a charity/project that they are already supporting. 

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
17.1  CB  replied to  magnoliaave @17    9 years ago

You are complaining, if only around the edges. Conservatives, enough. Mrs. Obama has the heart for helping this nation's kids:

Michelle Obama’s nutrition message to Trump: ‘Don’t play with our children’

In comments in Washington, D.C., the former first lady said she would rebuke any attempt to wipe out her work on childhood obesity.

05/12/2017 02:37 PM EDT

Michelle Obama has a message for President Donald Trump: If you want to undo the Obama administration's healthy eating agenda, get ready for a fight.

"We’ve got to make sure we don’t let anybody take us back," the former first lady said Friday at the annual Partnership for a Healthier America Summit, her first public appearance in Washington since leaving office.

"Every elected official on this planet should understand," Obama said, her voice rising with indignation as she urged moms to make their voices heard. "Don’t play with our children. Don’t do it."

Obama, who remains popular with the public, did not mention Trump by name but railed against the new administration's moves to roll back some of the nutrition policies she championed in the White House — from school meals to calorie labels. She left no doubt she will publicly rebuke any attempt to wipe out her work on childhood obesity.

"If we really want to make this country great, then our kids need to be healthy and they need to have access to the best," she said. "Not just some of them, but all of them."

Obama's comments came days after the Trump administration announced it will relax some of the school nutrition standards that are a central part of her Let's Move! campaign to combat childhood obesity. She discussed her work on children's health for nearly an hour during an onstage Q&A, where she was noticeably more relaxed and candid compared to speeches she delivered at the summit during her husband's presidency.

But while she seemed more at ease, her fierce responses underscored the threat posed to her legacy — something she said she views not through a political lens but, rather, as a mother.

“My commitment to these issues is real,” she said. “When you hear me getting riled up in this chair, it’s not politics — it’s parenting that's really moving me.”

Just last week, the administration announced it is staving off Obama-era sodium limits for school meals that were set to become more strict in coming years. The administration is also giving schools a little more leeway on requirements she had championed to serve whole grains — modest changes that were widely seen as an assault on the Obamas' food priorities.

Obama bristled at the idea that anyone — let alone the government — would not be on board with schools serving students more nutritious options. "You have to stop and think: Why don't we want kids to have good food at schools? What is wrong with you?" Obama said, to boisterous applause. "Why would that be political?"

The Department of Agriculture declined to comment on the criticism, other than to say that Agriculture Secretary Sonny Perdue "has great respect for the former first lady."

The Trump administration also last week delayed an Obama-era rule requiring restaurants, grocery stores and movie theaters to post calorie counts on their menus, a vestige of the Affordable Care Act that has been delayed numerous times over the past seven years due to complaints from convenience stores and pizza chains, among other interests. Trump's FDA pulled the plug on the labeling deadline four days short of its effective date, leaving companies in the lurch after many had already invested time and resources to meet the requirements.

People have a right to greater disclosure of things like calories and added sugars in what they are eating, Obama said, once again questioning the partisanship over the issue.

" This just isn’t that complicated, you know?” she said, laughing incredulously. “Just tell me what’s in my food. Why is there a problem?”

“'Keep families ignorant,' that’s all I’m hearing,” she said. "You don't know what's in your food. You can't handle that, mom."

"Consumers out there," she added, "I don't care where you're from, or what your party is; I would be highly insulted."

The Trump administration has said it's aiming to make the menu labeling rule more flexible for businesses, a process that could take years.

With the Obamas now in planning mode and laying the groundwork for their post-White House work, the former first lady reiterated she’s not going to retreat from her passionate advocacy on food and nutrition issues. “We’re not gone,” Obama said. “We’re just breathing, y'all.”

While public health advocates worry the Trump administration will go further to attempt to demolish Obama’s legacy of policies that promote healthier eating — from updated Nutrition Facts labels to a ban on trans fats and moves to dial down sodium in processed foods — there’s still momentum in the private sector for those initiatives.

The Partnership for a Healthier America, a nonprofit that launched during former President Barack Obama’s first term to help support the Let’s Move! campaign, announced 30 new corporate partnerships this week. Major candy makers — representing nearly half of the domestic market — pledged to sell smaller packs, while convenience store chains that serve 160 million people each day committed to stepping up efforts to offer healthier options in corner stores and gas stations. . . . .

Beyond private-sector commitments, Michelle Obama’s allies hope the cultural impact of her White House initiatives will continue to drive change. The White House vegetable garden remains a symbol on the South Lawn, though the Trump administration has not publicized it as Obama did. The former first lady's supporters are working on a multimillion-dollar campaign aimed at making fruits and vegetables "cool," and they note that consumers are demanding healthier foods at restaurants and grocery stores across the country.

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

"You have to stop and think: Why don't we want kids to have good food at schools? What is wrong with you?" Obama said, to boisterous applause. "Why would that be political?" — Michelle Obama, 2017

 
 
 
magnoliaave
Sophomore Silent
17.1.1  magnoliaave  replied to  CB @17.1    9 years ago

A lot of other people have heart, also.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
17.1.2  CB  replied to  magnoliaave @17.1.1    9 years ago

Then we should join forces on this one. Why break each others hearts? Michelle Obama loves children, for she believes they are made in the image of God. Let's agree on this, my dear lady!

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
18  CB    9 years ago

Geesh, you would think Michelle Obama was associated with a MTV anti-smoking campaign:

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
19  MrFrost    9 years ago

Photo removed due to TOS.. no nudity. [ph]

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
19.1  MrFrost  replied to  MrFrost @19    9 years ago

Bare arms = bad.. Flashing vag and boobs = good. So glad I am not a Christian. 

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
19.1.1  CB  replied to  MrFrost @19.1    9 years ago

Please, do not blame Christianity for the double-standard that is an aging Pat Robertson.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
19.1.2  CB  replied to  MrFrost @19.1    9 years ago

Please, do not blame Christianity for the double-standard that is an aging Pat Robertson.

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
19.2  MrFrost  replied to  MrFrost @19    9 years ago

Apologies, i forgot...

 
 
 
Rhyferys
Freshman Silent
20  Rhyferys    9 years ago

Who expected anything different. Trumpanzees cannot create or build, they can only destroy. Not to worry, as soon as we get back control, we will merely rebuild everything that Trump has destroyed, and America will actually become great again.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
21  JohnRussell    9 years ago

Obama’s school lunches were arguably some of the most vile, disgusting things ever known to man...

laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude laughing dude

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
22  Hal A. Lujah    9 years ago

This is Amurica, we can’t have uppity black folk making healthy policy.  We need obese children to fill in the ranks of those morbidly obese slobs who kick the bucket, and keep the disease management machine humming.

I’m at a resort as I write this, overlooking the pool area crammed with some of the most unhealthy looking people imaginable.  Yesterday my family packed a lunch to eat at a major theme park.  We had sandwiches, snap peas, hummus, apple slices, and a small bag of chips.  It was delicious, reasonably healthy, and the exact opposite of the kind of school lunches conservatives are clamoring for.

 
 

Who is online