╌>

Bannon Subpoenaed To Testify Before Russia Probe Grand Jury

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  johnrussell  •  8 years ago  •  98 comments

Bannon Subpoenaed To Testify Before Russia Probe Grand Jury

https://www.yahoo.com/news/ex-trump-adviser-bannon-subpoenaed-special-counsel-russia-170414980.html

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Steve Bannon, a former top adviser to U.S. President Donald Trump, has been subpoenaed to testify before a grand jury as part of a special counsel's probe into alleged Russian meddling in the 2016 U.S. presidential election,  the New York Times reported  on Tuesday.




The New York Times, which cited a person with direct knowledge of the matter in its report, said it marked the first time Special Counsel Robert Mueller has used such a move against a member of Trump's inner circle.

A spokesman for the special counsel declined to comment on the report.

Bannon, who recently had a public falling out with Trump over comments he made to an author of a controversial book, was meeting on Tuesday with the U.S. House of Representatives' Intelligence Committee as part of its own Russia investigation.


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1  seeder  JohnRussell    8 years ago

The New York Times, which cited a person with direct knowledge of the matter in its report, said it marked the first time Special Counsel Robert Mueller has used such a move against a member of Trump's inner circle.

Lock him up. 

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Silent
1.1  igknorantzrulz  replied to  JohnRussell @1    8 years ago

Bannen or Trump

of course

BOTH

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Silent
1.1.2  igknorantzrulz  replied to    8 years ago
thanks for the belly laugh

that's what I'm here for 

 
 
 
Willjay9
Freshman Silent
1.1.3  Willjay9  replied to    8 years ago

Same thing was said about Michael Flynn......what happened to him again?

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Silent
1.2  igknorantzrulz  replied to  JohnRussell @1    8 years ago

it marked the first time Special Counsel Robert Mueller has used such a move against a member of Trump's inner circle

betting Bannon requested this, so he can say he had no choice

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2  seeder  JohnRussell    8 years ago

What does Michael Flynn know about Bannon's involvement that could put Bannon in jeopardy for perjury if Bannon tries to lie in order to protect Trump?

It is going to get interesting. 

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Silent
2.1  igknorantzrulz  replied to  JohnRussell @2    8 years ago
What does Michael Flynn know about Bannon's involvement

I'd have to guess

ALOT

 
 
 
dkemmerer
Freshman Silent
3  dkemmerer    8 years ago

Mueller's gradually tightening the vise around Trump's balls. I can't wait to see what the soon-to-be-sent right-wing chain email tells the Trumpettes to say.

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Silent
3.1  igknorantzrulz  replied to  dkemmerer @3    8 years ago
I can't wait to see what the soon-to-be-sent right-wing chain email tells the Trumpettes to say.

I Can

 
 
 
epistte
Junior Participates
3.2  epistte  replied to  dkemmerer @3    8 years ago
Mueller's gradually tightening the vise around Trump's balls. I can't wait to see what the soon-to-be-sent right-wing chain email tells the Trumpettes to say.

 I've missed your intelligent input. 

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Silent
3.2.1  igknorantzrulz  replied to  epistte @3.2    8 years ago
your intelligent input

are you implying you haven't missed my unintelligent output

cause

I would certainly understand.

I do respect your input though, for what ever that's not worth

 
 
 
epistte
Junior Participates
3.2.2  epistte  replied to  igknorantzrulz @3.2.1    8 years ago

I generate enough unintelligent input of my own. I don't need anyone's assistance. 

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Silent
3.2.3  igknorantzrulz  replied to  epistte @3.2.2    8 years ago

just saying hello

no offense meant, hopefully none taking

I enjoy reading your correspondence to inferior debaters

 
 
 
epistte
Junior Participates
3.2.4  epistte  replied to  igknorantzrulz @3.2.3    8 years ago

just saying hello

no offense meant, hopefully none taking

No offense taken. I do not get insulted or offended easily.

I enjoy reading your correspondence to inferior debaters

That is very kind of you to say. I hope I can live up to that.

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Silent
3.2.5  igknorantzrulz  replied to  epistte @3.2.4    8 years ago
I do not get insulted or offended easily

I sometimes do

I'm the little snowflake melting, while hiding in the corner

maybe you recall me from Newsvine, I was named after the current state of our country, igknorantzrulz

 
 
 
epistte
Junior Participates
3.2.6  epistte  replied to  igknorantzrulz @3.2.5    8 years ago
maybe you recall me from Newsvine, I was named after the current state of our country, igknorantzrulz

I do remember you. 

I get very sarcastic and then often delete what I considered posting because others do not often share my appreciation for scathing sarcasm and satire. 

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Silent
3.2.7  igknorantzrulz  replied to  epistte @3.2.6    8 years ago
scathing sarcasm and satire

whats that...

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Silent
3.2.8  igknorantzrulz  replied to  epistte @3.2.6    8 years ago
I do remember you

I prefer your old Avatar

 
 
 
epistte
Junior Participates
3.2.9  epistte  replied to  igknorantzrulz @3.2.8    8 years ago
I prefer your old Avatar

My hipster Ariel avatar?

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Silent
3.2.10  igknorantzrulz  replied to  epistte @3.2.9    8 years ago

yep, that's how I recall you

as

am amphibious librarian, and I sort of pictured you SHHHHHSHHHSHHHHSHHHHing me often

just my no faulty memory I guess

 
 
 
epistte
Junior Participates
3.2.11  epistte  replied to  igknorantzrulz @3.2.10    8 years ago

I've used many different avatars in online forums. 

I traditionally use a grinch at Xmas but I forgot to change it.

370be6043c8d248c231361bce8c2451b.jpg

I'm using this avatar in another forum now,

4ca272448ec71de655c68aabcb6726f5.jpg

I love the concept of an amphibious librarian. SSSSSh'ing people.

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Silent
3.2.12  igknorantzrulz  replied to  epistte @3.2.11    8 years ago
the concept of an amphibious librarian. SSSSSh'ing people

hey, we all have expectations about people on the anonymous spider net web

 
 
 
sandy-2021492
Professor Guide
3.2.13  sandy-2021492  replied to  igknorantzrulz @3.2.5    8 years ago
igknorantzrulz

Good to have you here!

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Silent
3.2.14  igknorantzrulz  replied to  sandy-2021492 @3.2.13    8 years ago

thank you Sandy

aren't you a Newsvine refugee as well ?

 
 
 
sandy-2021492
Professor Guide
3.2.15  sandy-2021492  replied to  igknorantzrulz @3.2.14    8 years ago

I am.

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Silent
3.2.16  igknorantzrulz  replied to  sandy-2021492 @3.2.15    8 years ago

well it s good to hear and read you again and I'm very sorry

you can't say the same   but is your avatar ?

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Silent
3.2.17  igknorantzrulz  replied to  igknorantzrulz @3.2.16    8 years ago

the same

 
 
 
sandy-2021492
Professor Guide
3.2.18  sandy-2021492  replied to  igknorantzrulz @3.2.17    8 years ago

It's the same cat, just in a different pose.  In my NV avatar, he was laying on his back all twisted up like a pretzel.  Cobalt asked if he gave yoga lessons :)

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Silent
3.2.19  igknorantzrulz  replied to  sandy-2021492 @3.2.18    8 years ago

CobaltBlue    I liked her, but moi' and ole Queen B JennCelli tended to butt heads a tad

didn't I see they were members here somewhere or other >?

 
 
 
sandy-2021492
Professor Guide
3.2.20  sandy-2021492  replied to  igknorantzrulz @3.2.19    8 years ago

I've seen CB's avatar, but I've never seen her comment.  I haven't seen Jen Celli here, but I'm friends with her on Facebook.

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Silent
3.2.21  igknorantzrulz  replied to  sandy-2021492 @3.2.20    8 years ago

I just joined this site Friday as well as Minds  I saw Cobalt for sure somewhere

was never exactly chummy , but believe ole Jenn wouldn't allow the SIN a stirs, to ever accept me, and you know me, that's what I'm here for   G Damn Exceptance !

 
 
 
sandy-2021492
Professor Guide
3.2.22  sandy-2021492  replied to  igknorantzrulz @3.2.21    8 years ago

I'm sorry you felt that way.  I never really had a problem with Jenn.

I'm on Minds.com, too, but good grief the amount of white supremacist crap there is insane.  I think I spent two weeks blocking the worst of it, and then I was left with boosted material over and over again.  I drop in sometimes, but not very often.

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Silent
3.2.23  igknorantzrulz  replied to  sandy-2021492 @3.2.22    8 years ago

I tend to have a slight problem with authority, and authority figures, though I do find Perrieto be fair.

we're both gonna be introuble if we keep gossipin here

Bannons guilty damnet !

Trumps Guilty as well        Impeach E Keen

 
 
 
Jonathan P
Sophomore Silent
5  Jonathan P    8 years ago

Interesting, John.

Someone that you have no respect for and have never believed a word he said is testifying against a person that you have no respect for and have never believed a word he said.

I'm looking forward to seeing what you decide to cull from that testimony.

 
 
 
dkemmerer
Freshman Silent
5.1  dkemmerer  replied to  Jonathan P @5    8 years ago

Someone else who doesn't understand what a grand jury does.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
5.2  Ozzwald  replied to  Jonathan P @5    8 years ago
Someone that you have no respect for and have never believed a word he said is testifying against a person that you have no respect for and have never believed a word he said.

Bannon will be under oath, he will not know what Mueller already knows, so if he lies about something odds are Mueller will know then it's off to jail for Bannon.

Trump on the other hand has never testified under oath about this yet, odds are that if he does, he will be looking at perjury charges since he is not smart enough to do anything but lie.

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Participates
5.2.1  Dulay  replied to  Ozzwald @5.2    8 years ago

And if the House staffers questioning him today do their job, the transcript can be used to show that he has already talked about the event or that he is either lying to the FBI or lied to the Congress. 

 
 
 
Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו
Junior Quiet
5.2.2  Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו  replied to  Ozzwald @5.2    8 years ago

Good times....good times

 
 
 
OldUSAFGuy
Freshman Silent
6  OldUSAFGuy    8 years ago

Could always pull a "Susan McDougal"

Then get a Pardon...............

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Silent
6.1  igknorantzrulz  replied to  OldUSAFGuy @6    8 years ago
always pull a "Susan McDougal"

do you think Bannon is loyal enough to go to jail for someone he describes as a child ?

I think not

by the way, big Skynyrd fan here as well

 
 
 
OldUSAFGuy
Freshman Silent
6.1.1  OldUSAFGuy  replied to  igknorantzrulz @6.1    8 years ago

And you dont think that McDougal wasnt "Compensated" for her time?

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Silent
6.1.2  igknorantzrulz  replied to  OldUSAFGuy @6.1.1    8 years ago
"Compensated"

they supplied her with Metamucil ?

of course she was, by someone

Bannon is a multi millionaire without the "convictions' so to speak, of a McDougal, who actually had respect for those she most likely was protecting     I've stated many many times, no fan of Hillary   just less a fan of Trump

Lynyrd Skynyrd  'Junkie'   is one of my favorites

 
 
 
OldUSAFGuy
Freshman Silent
6.1.3  OldUSAFGuy  replied to  igknorantzrulz @6.1    8 years ago

Queen, RUSH top my favorites.

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
6.1.5  MrFrost  replied to    8 years ago

Did you ever see his Barcelona video? Amazing stuff. Freddy was the real deal, no doubt of it. 

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Quiet
6.1.6  Paula Bartholomew  replied to    8 years ago

Are you looking forward to his life story coming out?  The actor who plays Mr Robot is doing him.

 
 
 
OldUSAFGuy
Freshman Silent
6.1.7  OldUSAFGuy  replied to    8 years ago

No doubt there..........

Though he really never got "Credit" for it Roy Orbison had an outstanding voice.

 
 
 
OldUSAFGuy
Freshman Silent
6.1.8  OldUSAFGuy  replied to  MrFrost @6.1.5    8 years ago

Saw Queen live twice, a show you will never forget!

 
 
 
Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו
Junior Quiet
6.2  Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו  replied to  OldUSAFGuy @6    8 years ago

Speaking of which, Ol Joe Assholepaio is surprised to learn that his acceptance of the Shitbag's pardon is admission of guilt.  Stupidity is once again shown to be a pre-requisite for any rethuglican office holder, candidate and above all president.  

 
 
 
OldUSAFGuy
Freshman Silent
6.2.1  OldUSAFGuy  replied to  Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו @6.2    8 years ago

Hmm could that also be why Susan McDougal was Pardoned?

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Participates
6.3  Dulay  replied to  OldUSAFGuy @6    8 years ago
Then get a Pardon...............

Someone who is pardoned can no longer plead the 5th because they are no longer in danger of self incrimination. 

Insert hilarious laughter emoji. 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
7  Sean Treacy    8 years ago

Per the New York Times, 

"Mr. Bannon has limited firsthand knowledge about two key issues within Mr. Mueller’s purview — the president’s firing of James B. Comey as F.B.I. director, a decision made without Mr. Bannon present, and the drafting of a misleading statement about the subject of the June 2016 meeting with Russians, in which they promised damaging information about Hillary Clinton."

Nothing about collusion, again.....

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Silent
7.1  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Sean Treacy @7    8 years ago
collusion

how about obstruction or the Hatch act ?

Trump just lied through his teeth at a woman's event, bet you many won't hang out for the post meat and grab

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
7.1.1  Sean Treacy  replied to  igknorantzrulz @7.1    8 years ago

how about obstruction or the Hatch act 

Investigate him first and worry about probable cause later.. 

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Silent
7.1.2  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Sean Treacy @7.1.1    8 years ago
Investigate him first and worry about probable cause later..

is that the Hillary approach ?

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Participates
7.1.3  Dulay  replied to  Sean Treacy @7.1.1    8 years ago
Investigate him first and worry about probable cause later..

Do you seriously think that our legal system requires probable cause BEFORE they investigate? 

 
 
 
Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו
Junior Quiet
7.2  Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו  replied to  Sean Treacy @7    8 years ago

Right.   It's obstruction of justice -- a much more solid charge to both try and convict than collusion. 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
7.2.1  Sean Treacy  replied to  Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו @7.2    8 years ago

Well, it's better than the imaginary "Trump colluded with the Russians" lie the left has been peddling for a year, at least. 

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Silent
7.2.2  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Sean Treacy @7.2.1    8 years ago
"Trump colluded with the Russians" lie the left has been peddling for a year, at least.

You do realize Mueller and the majority of the FBI investigating any Collusion possibilities are Republicans who have guilty pleas by two of Trumps administration, one being the former National Security Advisor, correct ? Two others will be going to court over your so called 'lie' as well. Sessions, the Attorney General was caught lying about any meetings with Russians, and was forced to recluse himself. Jared Kushner is required to update his lying about Russia meetings on a bi-monthly basis. Trumps' son , Manafort his former Campaign manager, Kushner, and another who escapes my mind, met with half a dozen Russians in Trump Tower to get Dirt on Trumps' then opponent Hillary Clinton.

What did I lie about here.      Please, do correct me    I thank U in advance 

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
7.2.3  MrFrost  replied to  Sean Treacy @7.2.1    8 years ago
Well, it's better than the imaginary "Trump colluded with the Russians" lie

How do you know it's a lie? 

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
7.2.4  MrFrost  replied to  igknorantzrulz @7.2.2    8 years ago

IMG_20170912_142709.jpg

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Silent
7.2.5  igknorantzrulz  replied to  MrFrost @7.2.4    8 years ago

yea, but Trump said NO ONE from his Administration had met with Russians

so that paltry list is obviously

'Fake News'

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
8  MrFrost    8 years ago

Here is the problem these people are going to have. Mueller has 400,000 emails from everyone in trumps admin from the last 18 months. If people like Bannon lie, and Mueller has proof of it in one of Bannon's emails...He's screwed. Same with all these people's interviews. Lying to a grand jury is not a good idea. 

 
 

Who is online