╌>

Trump announces U.S. military strikes in Syria

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  heartland-american  •  8 years ago  •  196 comments

Trump announces U.S. military strikes in Syria

President Trump on Friday announced that he has approved military strikes in Syria against the regime of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.

The announcement follows a suspected chemical gas attack from the Assad regime on a rebel-held town near the Syrian capital last weekend.


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Participates
2  Thrawn 31    8 years ago

Wonder if these will be as pointless as the last round. 

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Quiet
2.2  arkpdx  replied to  Thrawn 31 @2    8 years ago

The last one and this action carried out by President Trump, the UK and France will have a lot better and bigger point than Obama's red line in the sand message. 

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Participates
2.2.1  Thrawn 31  replied to  arkpdx @2.2    8 years ago
The last one and this action carried out by President Trump, the UK and France will have a lot better and bigger point than Obama's red line in the sand message. 

Yawn, and Assad will continue to use chem weapons, we will still have zero coherent strategy, and we will be ever closer to a potential conflict with Russia. We may as well just admit that we don't really care and call it a day. 

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
2.2.2  MrFrost  replied to  arkpdx @2.2    8 years ago
The last one and this action carried out by President Trump, the UK and France will have a lot better and bigger point than Obama's red line in the sand message.

How many lines has trumptard drawn in north korea? Something about fire and fury? Still hasn't done dick. 

 
 
 
Randy
Sophomore Quiet
2.2.5  Randy  replied to  XDm9mm @2.2.3    8 years ago

No one knows what Kim Jung Un is doing. You don't. I don't and Trump sure as Fuck doesn't.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
2.2.8  Greg Jones  replied to  Thrawn 31 @2.2.1    8 years ago
we will still have zero coherent strategy,

Is that why Obama turned tail and ran away from his red line, like the cowardly wimp that he is?

 
 
 
Randy
Sophomore Quiet
2.2.12  Randy  replied to  XDm9mm @2.2.7    8 years ago
I'll submit that Trump sure as "fuck" knows a whole lot more than YOU think he does.

I highly doubt that.

 
 
 
Sunshine
Professor Quiet
2.3  Sunshine  replied to  Thrawn 31 @2    8 years ago

How do you know they where pointless?

There may have been more chemical attacks, we don't know.  Are you privy to Assad's thoughts?

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Participates
2.3.1  Thrawn 31  replied to  Sunshine @2.3    8 years ago
How do you know they where pointless?

Did the last one stop the use of chemical weapons, the answer is a pretty clear fuck no, thus it was completely pointless. 

There may have been more chemical attacks, we don't know. 

Yes we do, there have been numerous since the last missile strike Trump launched (which didn't really cause much in the way of damage).  The big difference this time is the Russians are vowing to shoot down our missiles and potentially launch a retaliatory strike, much higher stakes. 

Rather than missile strikes, it'd be nice if Trump (or anyone in his administration) could actually lay out something resembling a coherent strategy regarding Syria. 

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Quiet
2.3.3  arkpdx  replied to  dennis smith @2.3.2    8 years ago

Oh come on Dennis,  Obama did something .He backpedalled away from his "red line in the sand" statement as quick as he could and let his palm Putin and the Russians take the initiative to appear to do something and get the kudos .

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Quiet
3  arkpdx    8 years ago

What do you use when you want to send the very best! 

" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"> Tomahawk

" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"> Hornet

 
 
 
" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"> B-2

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Quiet
3.1.1  arkpdx  replied to  arkpdx @3.1    8 years ago
" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"> USS Donald Cook
 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
3.1.3  bugsy  replied to  XXJefferson51 @3.1.2    8 years ago

That would be awesome, but unfortunately, would not fit into today's modern warfare....with the exception of the tomahawks. I decommissioned her for the last time in 91, and the final full bore of the 16 inchers was absolutely riveting and something to remember.

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
3.2  JBB  replied to  arkpdx @3    8 years ago

Shock and Awe intended to distract the public from this little detail that landed in the news today, too...

 
 
 
lennylynx
Sophomore Silent
4  lennylynx    8 years ago

Way to go President Trump, give 'em hell!  thumbs up

 
 
 
lady in black
Professor Silent
5  lady in black    8 years ago

So Trump is launching air strikes to champion the children of Syria. The same Syrian children he refused refuge on US soil.  What a guy s/

 
 
 
Sunshine
Professor Quiet
5.2  Sunshine  replied to  lady in black @5    8 years ago

this will hopefully do more for all Syrian people. 

something wrong with that?

how do you propose we take in all of Syria?

 
 
 
livefreeordie
Junior Silent
5.4  livefreeordie  replied to  lady in black @5    8 years ago

We are just going by the words of Comey

It's impossible to vett the Syrian refugees. How are we getting records on them from the Syrian govt?

FBI on Difficulty vetting refugees

"FBI Director James Comey added in congressional testimony last month that "a number of people who were of serious concern" slipped through the screening of Iraq War refugees, including two arrested on terrorism-related charges. "There's no doubt that was the product of a less than excellent vetting," he said.

Although Comey said the process has since "improved dramatically," Syrian refugees will be even harder to check because, unlike in Iraq, U.S. soldiers have not been on the ground collecting information on the local population. "If we don't know much about somebody, there won't be anything in our data," he said. "I can't sit here and offer anybody an absolute assurance that there's no risk associated with this."

one of the senior administration officials at Tuesday's briefing acknowledged the limitations inherent in screening refugees from Syria, where it's very difficult to determine something as basic as an applicant's criminal history.

"We do the best with what we have," the official said. "We talk to people about what their criminal histories are, and we hear about that. That's pretty much where we are."

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
5.4.1  MrFrost  replied to  livefreeordie @5.4    8 years ago
We are just going by the words of Comey

Right, so now trump attacked Syria because of Comey? Skirting the CoC [ph]

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
5.4.2  Greg Jones  replied to  MrFrost @5.4.1    8 years ago

Comment removed for CoC violation [ph]

 
 
 
livefreeordie
Junior Silent
5.4.3  livefreeordie  replied to  MrFrost @5.4.1    8 years ago

I wasn't talking about the missile strikes.  My comment was in response to not allowing Syrian refugees.  Try to keep up to the context

 
 
 
magnoliaave
Sophomore Silent
5.5  magnoliaave  replied to  lady in black @5    8 years ago

What is your problem?

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
6  JohnRussell    8 years ago

The smoke is clearing and the NBC correspondents are saying that the attack was basically the minimum the US could have done and still call it an attack. 

 
 
 
PJ
Masters Silent
6.1  PJ  replied to  JohnRussell @6    8 years ago

I thought President Trump told Russia several days ago that the US would be bombing Syria.  It's silly that the news acts like this was breaking news.   lol

 
 
 
PJ
Masters Silent
6.1.2  PJ  replied to  Texan1211 @6.1.1    8 years ago

Truth be told, I really don't care what he does.  I have to save myself and my sanity.  devil

 
 
 
PJ
Masters Silent
6.1.4  PJ  replied to  Texan1211 @6.1.3    8 years ago

Yeah - I made a statement about the news acting like this was breaking news.  It wasn't new or unknown.  It had been broadcast days ago.  What's your point?

 
 
 
PJ
Masters Silent
6.1.6  PJ  replied to  Texan1211 @6.1.5    8 years ago

Look dude - I'm not trying to make you personally feel bad because you weren't able to pick up on what most of us already knew was going to happen.  I mean.....you don't have to understand Russian to figure this one out.  lol    

 
 
 
PJ
Masters Silent
6.1.8  PJ  replied to  Texan1211 @6.1.7    8 years ago

I thought you'd enjoy that.  winking

 
 
 
PJ
Masters Silent
6.1.10  PJ  replied to  Texan1211 @6.1.9    8 years ago

Actually, yes I did know that France would participate.  President Macron had reached out to the WH to offer support and to let the US know that France was ready to assist.  I didn't hear any reports on the UK but the UK always has our back.

your turn.......

 
 
 
PJ
Masters Silent
6.1.12  PJ  replied to  Texan1211 @6.1.11    8 years ago

This is fun!

pssst.....it's okay to be awed by me.  I'm pretty spectacular

 
 
 
PJ
Masters Silent
6.1.15  PJ  replied to  Texan1211 @6.1.11    8 years ago

Well - I gotta go but don't worry, you could win the next one.   Ciao    peace

 
 
 
PJ
Masters Silent
6.1.16  PJ  replied to  Texan1211 @6.1.13    8 years ago

I admit I did a quick search but that doesn't change the fact that it was in the news days ago.  I'm chalking this one up as a win for me.  You'll have to try and win the next one.  I gotta run - different time zone and I can barely keep my eyes open.  Cheers

 
 
 
PJ
Masters Silent
6.1.17  PJ  replied to  Texan1211 @6.1.14    8 years ago

You're probably right.  hahahahahaha 

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
6.1.18  MrFrost  replied to  Texan1211 @6.1.1    8 years ago

Fire and fury....one of the 7 red lines trump drew in the sand and NK jumped over. 

 
 
 
PJ
Masters Silent
6.1.20  PJ  replied to  XDm9mm @6.1.19    8 years ago

Good luck with THAT losing battle.

(I'm sorry, you really did leave yourself wide open for that one.)

huh?  

 
 
 
PJ
Masters Silent
6.1.22  PJ  replied to  XDm9mm @6.1.21    8 years ago

Yes, I recognized my comments being quoted but I was confused about the personal dig.  I don't recall where I've done that to you.  It just caught me off guard.

 
 
 
PJ
Masters Silent
6.1.24  PJ  replied to  XDm9mm @6.1.23    8 years ago

ahhhhh.....okay.  I misinterpreted your comment.  my apologies.  blushing

 
 
 
livefreeordie
Junior Silent
6.3  livefreeordie  replied to  JohnRussell @6    8 years ago

Nonsense. It was the US, UK, and France with combined missiles and aircraft hitting 6-7 sites that we know of including WMD research sites.

even anti-Trump CNN is being more honest about this than the Stalinists at NBC

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
6.5  Greg Jones  replied to  JohnRussell @6    8 years ago

Gave the Russians time to move their inbed nationals out of harms way. Took out some warehouses and manufacturing facilities. They have enough intel to know where everything is or where it is being moved to. Meant to send the initial message. Much more and worse could follow, including destroying runways.

 
 
 
Spikegary
Junior Quiet
12  Spikegary    8 years ago

So I'm sitting in the airport watching CNN and they're talking about how the president failed to notify Congress of the strikes like he was doing something wrong, but he doesn't have to, except for a declaration of war, but then again it is CNN.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
12.1  bugsy  replied to  Spikegary @12    8 years ago

They were also talking about how they think Trump wanted this strike to take the country away from the Russia "investigation".

Anyone who believes that channel is as dumb as those who sit in front of a camera and spew it.

 
 
 
Randy
Sophomore Quiet
12.2  Randy  replied to  Spikegary @12    8 years ago

So I'm sitting in the airport watching CNN and they're talking about how the president failed to notify Congress of the strikes like he was doing something wrong, but he doesn't have to, except for a declaration of war, but then again it is CNN.

No, he doesn't have to, but if he intends this to be open ended as he seems to think, then he is going to have to go to Congress for a new authorization. The old 2001 one to go after Al-Qaeda just doesn't work in Syria. 

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Guide
13  Sparty On    8 years ago

Ah yes, hours after the attack the armchair quarterbacking begins.  

So many geo/sociopolitical and military experts here.   Perhaps Trump. May and Macron should be reading Newstalkers so they could be better informed.

I'll send them a note to let them know all the experts are here.

 
 

Who is online




104 visitors