Parents of kids killed by illegal immigrants: We ASKED Trump to sign photos of our children
On Friday, the legacy media successfully turned the focus away from the heartbreaking stories of families who have been permanently separated from their loved ones because of crimes committed by illegal immigrants and instead focused on how narcissistic President Trump supposedly is.
At an event at the White House hosting 11 “angel families” whose relatives suffered gruesome deaths at the hands of illegal immigrants, the president signed large photographs of the young victims. According to Trump’s detractors, that made him a “sociopathic ghoul,” as one person tweeted .
“He really will put his name on anything,” writer Johnny McNulty tweeted .
Filmmaker James Gunn tweeted : “This tone deaf oaf actually autographed photographs of murdered children.”
Entire articles were written about the furious fallout from the event caused by Trump’s signatures on the children’s photos. But apparently none of these people felt compelled to ask: Did these families want Trump’s signature on the photos of their deceased loved ones?
An article in The Hill stated definitely, “It is unclear when Trump autographed the images or if the families requested it.”
Well, it would have been pretty clear had The Hill writer simply asked. But since no one else was willing to, we did.
Sabine Durden, who lost her son Dominic in a fatal vehicle accident caused by an illegal immigrant in California, told CRTV: “I asked [President Trump] myself if he would please do me the honor to sign [my son’s] picture. He gladly agreed and obliged. The other Angel parents also asked for his signature on their poster.” She said, “It’s a true treasure to me. How very sad that [President Trump’s] signature on our pictures is now an issue instead [of] the reason why we only have pictures left.”
Chris Stansberry, who lost his daughter Tierra in a fire prosecutors allege was set by an illegal immigrant, told us that “all of us families ask[ed] President Trump to sign” the photos.
“It has nothing to do with his ego,” said Laura Wilkerson, a mother whose son Joshua was tortured, beaten to death, tied up, and set on fire by an illegal immigrant. She added that all the families would “much rather be at home with our children and never know President Trump.”
Steve Ronnebeck’s son Grant was shot and killed over a pack of cigarettes. The accused killer is an illegal immigrant. He also confirmed to CRTV that the families asked Trump to sign their pictures. “The President did not offer,” he told us. “He was requested to sign them.”
On Friday night, White House social media director Dan Scavino Jr. clarified on Twitter that the Trump autographs were “REQUESTED by family members after their private meeting and visit to the Oval Office.”
But the incurious media ignored his tweet, continued promoting a false narrative, and distracted from the real separation stories and the true immigration crisis: illegal immigrants and the sanctuary cities that harbor them.
Tags
Who is online
70 visitors

Further proof that anti-Trump FAKE NEWS is the enemy of the people.
the politicians who allow this are the ones who need to sign the pictures, Trump is trying to prevent more Citizens from being killed like this
So only children killed by illegals count, the thousands killed by U.S. citizens should be ignored?
Good for them.
Sabine Durden, who lost her son Dominic in a fatal vehicle accident caused by an illegal immigrant...
How many people are killed daily by illegal drivers that are not immigrants?
Chris Stansberry, who lost his daughter Tierra in a fire prosecutors allege was set by an illegal immigrant...
How many people are killed by fires not set by alleged immigrants?
And I really like this one:
Steve Ronnebeck’s son Grant was shot and killed over a pack of cigarettes.
Any of you remember Eric Garner, killed by police over cigarettes?
I think everyone is already aware, or should be, that Trump thinks anyone not anointed by him is an "animal" from some "shithole".
If your point is to say that the media is selective in their coverage, you are correct. But it has only been happening the last thousand years or so.
How many people are killed in automobile accidents? Gun violence can be ignored therefore? You need to work on your logic.
No, the logic is fine. I asked how many people are killed by illegal drivers that are not immigrants. If even one non-immigrant illegal driver has killed someone, then their families should have a photograph of their family member signed by the president. What is so illogical about that? Why don't you just say you don't agree rather than trying to hide behind a curtain?
After all, if you really wanted to split hairs, you want it broken down into which illegal drivers had what skin color. Were they in-state or out of state? Were they drunk or high? What was their age? Ad nauseaum. But no, you just want to say they were in the country illegally. I just turned the question around the other way. How many were in the country legally? And which; therefore, would be the bigger issue?
Id est, your arguments still consist of nothing.
You clearly don't understand logic. Ignoring the Ill effects of illegals because others also commit crimes is just bigotry.
Ignoring the logic that there are thousands more killed by citizens than illegals totaly goes against all logic.
What logic? We should ignore illegals killing kids because Us citizens do it too? What kind of ridiculous point could you possibly be trying to make with your posts?
You are correct. None of this has any logic. We have had the same problems with the border for about a century.
Bringing this up now and waving it as a flag is nothing but red meat for a select few. Most people think it is only about the border when it is not. trump is trying to change the way things are done for all immigrants.
People only latch onto the border as it is an easy way to rile up the gullible among us and distracts from what is trying to get done.
It works though as we have people frothing at the mouth and acting like the world is going to end. Laughable. People are really rubes. Latching on to a wedge issue that (like I said) has had the same problem for a century. Mean while ignoring other aspects he wants to change.
I understand logic just fine. It may be the premise you have issue with though. But the premise I use is the same premise of the article.
No one has said the killings by anyone should be ignored. The point is though, that illegals commit fewer crimes than citizens. Why is it so important to point out the least offensive as opposed to the most offensive? That is the same logic that says slavery is freedom, war is peace.
Instead of you thinking something, perhaps realistic facts are in order.
LEGITIMATE REFUGEES present themselves at LEGAL POINTS OF ENTRY and have never been separated from their children. Last time ... context matters.
If it was so "clear" why did Whitehouse spokesmen have to come out and "clarify" it? He may have meant it, but that is not what he said.
Again, that is not what he said, AND your explanation does not take into account his comment about wanting immigrants from Norway.
It was worse than that. The anti-Trump Left wing media again DELIBERATELY took his words out of context.
You didn't build that sentence yourself .....
You do know that MS-13 originated in this country do you not? With that context, anyone wanting to leave California would be illegal. Context matters after all.
LEGITIMATE REFUGEES present themselves at LEGAL POINTS OF ENTRY.
So no legitimate refugee has ever used anything other than a legal point of entry? You might want to think that one over again. Just to be sure. Because if even one example is found that refutes that statement, the whole statement fails. Just saying.
My seeded article pertains to NOW, not centuries ago. You are welcome to comment on my seeds, but stay on topic or leave.
I wasn't referring to centuries ago. That is your presumption, not mine.
Are you aware that most gangs in the US over the centuries have been founded by immigrants. Italian mafia, Jewish Mafia, Russian mafia, Irish mafia...Gangs of NY, gangs of the east coast, heartland, south and west coast. So MS13 is the latest in a very long line of gangs formed by immigrants.
How is any of that relevant to the topic in my seeded article?
Pointing out a fact to OSM and aparently you as well....In responding to a comment I'm on topic...
Wow that's a lot of nonsense OSM..I addressed your comment with a fact. If you can't deal with it, that's on you...LOL don't try to pass off your comment that is nothing more then bluster as anything but.
the president signed large photographs
He is the last person whose signature I would want on a picture of someone who is no longer with me.
Cool. The actual victims' families felt differently.
Would be any of the open border whores who allowed these families to be devastated by allowing illegals in the country in the first place.
At least they got the signature of a President who is trying to fix the problem.
You're entitled to your views, of course, but Angel Parents clearly feel differently.
Maybe we have someone who will stop this 'CATCH and RELEASE' crap, never to be seen again until one day in the future the parent is exported and everyone cries foul. Nip it in the bud and you won't have near as many children watching their parents exported from the country or you can set up the inevitable like that last fellow did.