╌>

North Korea Accuses U.S. Of Betraying The Spirit Of The Recent Summit, Says Current Pompeo Visit Is "Regrettable"

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  johnrussell  •  8 years ago  •  126 comments

North Korea Accuses U.S. Of Betraying The Spirit Of The Recent Summit, Says Current Pompeo Visit Is "Regrettable"

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



http://thehill.com/policy/international/395925-north-korea-says-talks-with-pompeo-regrettable-report

North Korea is reportedly criticizing talks with Secretary of State Mike Pompeo , calling the two days of meetings that ended Saturday “regrettable.”

An unnamed spokesman for the North Korean Foreign Ministry in a statement accused the U.S. of unilaterally pressuring North Korea to denuclearize and “betraying the spirit” of the summit between President Trump and Kim Jong Un last month, according to the Associated Press .

The statement said the discussions with Pompeo were “very concerning,” and suggested that the regime is no longer as willing to give up its nukes as it had previously been.

Pompeo offered a differing view of the two days of talks, telling reporters that the conversations were “productive,” "in good faith," and that “a great deal of progress” had been made, according to the AP .

The discussions came weeks after Trump and Kim signed an agreement committing the U.S. to unspecified security guarantees in exchange for a denuclearized Korean peninsula. Trump critics said the deal was too advantageous to North Korea and did not secure enough for the U.S. 

The agreement lacked specifics and the secretary's trip to Pyongyang this weekend was intended to discuss details of the deal. Pompeo met with multiple senior North Korean officials, including Kim's right-hand man, senior North Korean official Kim Yong Chol, but did not meet with Kim during this trip.


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1  seeder  JohnRussell    8 years ago

It is amazing how quickly this fell apart.  Trump's bullshit skills must not be what they used to be. 

The Trump lackey/newswoman Maria Bartiromo interviewed Trump for Fox the other day. Even in such a cozy setting Trump couldn't put a good spin on this, and just repeated that he thought he had a good personal chemistry with Kim Jong Un, with a sort of "I don't know what went wrong" look on his face.  

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Quiet
1.1  arkpdx  replied to  JohnRussell @1    8 years ago
It is amazing how quickly this fell apart

I guess it is a good thing that Trump did not do anything like,  oh say,  end the sections and give the plane loads of cash before the North Koreans actual showed that they would comply with the agreements. To bad that another president do similar things for a different country that continuously calls us "the Great Satan" and still calls for our total destruction. 

 
 
 
96WS6
Junior Silent
1.1.1  96WS6  replied to  arkpdx @1.1    8 years ago

Or strike a deal that guarantees nukes by 2030 if followed.

 
 
 
Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו
Junior Quiet
1.1.2  Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו  replied to  96WS6 @1.1.1    8 years ago

I see the rightwing bullshit puke funnel has been gushing at top capacity in my absence. 

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
1.1.3  bugsy  replied to  Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו @1.1.2    8 years ago

You were gone? Can't say anyone noticed...

 
 
 
Raven Wing
Professor Participates
1.1.4  Raven Wing   replied to  bugsy @1.1.3    8 years ago
Can't say anyone noticed...

That's because YOU don't speak for everyone, and YOU can't read everyone's thoughts like YOU like to think you can. 

I for one did notice Atheist's absence and missed him. And I for one am very glad to see him back with us.

You should learn to speak for yourself and let others speak for themselves. 

 

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
1.1.5  bugsy  replied to  Raven Wing @1.1.4    8 years ago
I for one did notice Atheist's absence and missed him. And I for one am very glad to see him back with us.

Well, that's one...

 
 
 
Raven Wing
Professor Participates
1.1.7  Raven Wing   replied to  bugsy @1.1.5    8 years ago

Yeah....and you don't speak for me. If I want to make myself heard, I am more than capable to do it myself. 

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
1.1.8  bugsy  replied to  Raven Wing @1.1.7    8 years ago

Not speaking for you. Simply made an observation.

 
 
 
Raven Wing
Professor Participates
1.1.9  Raven Wing   replied to  bugsy @1.1.8    8 years ago
Simply made an observation.

And it was an observation that you stated as if speaking for everyone else here, as you were obviously under the assumption that everyone else here feels and thinks the same as you do, which is not true. And it was stated with a very broad brush. 

 
 
 
lennylynx
Sophomore Silent
1.1.10  lennylynx  replied to  Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו @1.1.2    8 years ago

Welcome back, buddy, we need your sanity around here more than ever now. Big hugs

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
1.1.12  Greg Jones  replied to  bugsy @1.1.5    8 years ago

laughing dude

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
1.1.13  Greg Jones  replied to  Raven Wing @1.1.9    8 years ago
And it was stated with a very broad brush.

Which you are free to ignore. I believe broad brushes are allowed around here, as long they are not "sweeping generalizations"

Where did Randy go?

 
 
 
Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו
Junior Quiet
1.1.14  Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו  replied to  arkpdx @1.1    8 years ago
end the sections and give the plane loads of cash before the North Koreans actual showed that they would comply with the agreements. To bad that another president do similar things for a different country that continuously calls us "the Great Satan" and still calls for our total destruction.

More unneeded evidence that rightwing bullshit never dies.  

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
1.1.15  bugsy  replied to  Raven Wing @1.1.9    8 years ago

Boo!!!!There is a Russian under your bed.

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Quiet
1.1.16  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו @1.1.2    8 years ago

Welcome back.  It is nice to see you again.

 
 
 
Raven Wing
Professor Participates
1.1.17  Raven Wing   replied to  Greg Jones @1.1.13    8 years ago
Which you are free to ignore. I believe broad brushes are allowed around here, as long they are not "sweeping generalizations"

Who said it was a violation? I never said was, so don't put words in my mouth. Saying someone is using a broad brush is not against the CoC. 

So in our own words, my saying he used a broad brush is "Which you are free to ignore."

 
 
 
Raven Wing
Professor Participates
1.1.18  Raven Wing   replied to  bugsy @1.1.15    8 years ago
Boo!!!!There is a Russian under your bed.

Not ever, half of what I now own is stuffed under my bed. So your scare job attempt is a no go. 

Next

 
 
 
Raven Wing
Professor Participates
1.1.19  Raven Wing   replied to  Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו @1.1.14    8 years ago

Great to have you back Atheist. You have been sorely missed around here. thumbs up  

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Quiet
1.1.20  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Raven Wing @1.1.17    8 years ago
don't put words in my mouth.

I forget what movie this came from but the line was "Unless you have I LOVE YOU on the head of your dick and I am giving you a blow job, do not put words in my mouth."

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
1.1.21  Trout Giggles  replied to  bugsy @1.1.3    8 years ago

dittoing what Raven said. I missed Atheist's presence. So why don't you think the next time before you go speaking for "everyone"

 
 
 
96WS6
Junior Silent
1.1.22  96WS6  replied to  Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו @1.1.2    8 years ago

I wouldn't expect you to come up with any factual rebuttals LMFAO!

 
 
 
Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו
Junior Quiet
1.2  Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו  replied to  JohnRussell @1    8 years ago
It is amazing how quickly this fell apart.

Yeah, I thought it was a sure thing since NK never does this kind of thing and PresidentCheddarCheese is such a smooth operator. 

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
1.2.1  Tacos!  replied to  Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו @1.2    8 years ago
Yeah, I thought it was a sure thing

You thought what, exactly, was a sure thing?

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Expert
1.2.3  Ender  replied to    8 years ago

Where is Iran? Not ever in the news.

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Expert
1.2.5  Ender  replied to    8 years ago

Sure.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
1.2.6  Greg Jones  replied to  Ender @1.2.3    8 years ago
Where is Iran? Not ever in the news.

Weren't there recent demonstrations there against the government? Guess that would be ignored by the MSM.

 
 
 
Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו
Junior Quiet
1.2.7  Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו  replied to    8 years ago
Then why would you people trust Iran with more than a D cell battery?

Says someone who trusts a blathering moron to deal with the NKs.  And then you complain about the well-deserved ridicule you lot get.  No one ever trusted Iran.  That's why there were layers upon layers of monitoring (despite the constant lying by your side that there weren't any).  

 
 
 
SteevieGee
Professor Silent
1.2.8  SteevieGee  replied to  Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו @1.2    8 years ago

Sure is a good thing that NK isn't a threat anymore.  Kim threw Trump out of bed as soon as he saw his tiny little hands.

 
 
 
Raven Wing
Professor Participates
1.2.9  Raven Wing   replied to  SteevieGee @1.2.8    8 years ago
Kim threw Trump out of bed as soon as he saw his tiny little hands

I was all set to agree until I saw the last word. (hee hee)

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Participates
1.2.10  Dulay  replied to  Greg Jones @1.2.6    8 years ago
Weren't there recent demonstrations there against the government? Guess that would be ignored by the MSM.

Weren't there just demonstrations HERE against the government? As those aren't a blip on y'all's radar, why the interest in those in Iran? 

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
1.3  Greg Jones  replied to  JohnRussell @1    8 years ago

suggested that the regime is no longer as willing to give up its nukes as it had previously been.

Apparently he was never willing to give up his "nukes". But Trump still holds the upper hand with continuing sanctions and pressures from China and other interests in the region. I suspect this is just a face saving tactic by Kimmy Poo designed for internal consumption

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Expert
1.3.1  Ender  replied to  Greg Jones @1.3    8 years ago

What pressure from China? China is expanding its reach and doesn't seem to be to worried about NK.

 
 
 
Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו
Junior Quiet
1.3.2  Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו  replied to  Greg Jones @1.3    8 years ago
But Trump still holds the upper hand with continuing sanctions and pressures from China and other interests in the region.

Absolutely no evidence of any of that -- a fact that Un's latest behavior underscores.  Trump's got nothing in his upper hand but his limp dick. 

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
1.3.3  Trout Giggles  replied to  Greg Jones @1.3    8 years ago
Apparently he was never willing to give up his "nukes".

but....but....but....

Wasn't that what all the hoopla was about? What was all that noise you guys were making last month? Bad sushi?

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
1.4  Tacos!  replied to  JohnRussell @1    8 years ago
It is amazing how quickly this fell apart.

How quickly what fell apart? They're talking. It's not like we had some kind of alliance with them. No one's status had changed. And all you've ever heard Trump say is "we'll see what happens."

 
 
 
321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu
Sophomore Participates
1.4.1  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu   replied to  Tacos! @1.4    8 years ago
And all you've ever heard Trump say is "we'll see what happens."

No that's not all I heard the president say. He said the North Korean threat was over. 

Personally I think the president was talking out of his ass once again. 

..............................................

President Donald Trump declared on Wednesday that there was “no longer a Nuclear Threat from North Korea,”

..........................................

North Korea continues construction of nuclear research facility despite agreement to 'denuclearize': report

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Quiet
1.4.2  arkpdx  replied to  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu @1.4.1    8 years ago

deleted

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
1.4.3  Greg Jones  replied to  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu @1.4.1    8 years ago
No that's not all I heard the president say. He said the North Korean threat was over.It is over, for all practical purposes. Kim won't dare to do anything stupid or provocative. All kinds of firepower remain targeted at NK.

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Participates
1.4.4  Dulay  replied to  Greg Jones @1.4.3    8 years ago
It is over, for all practical purposes. Kim won't dare to do anything stupid or provocative. All kinds of firepower remain targeted at NK.

Well hell, the firepower was there long before the Kabuki summit and Kim was shooting off ICBMs, which seems pretty fucking provocative to me. 

So what has Trump done exactly, other than halt our joint preparedness exercises, which is what both NK and China wanted?

We got?

 
 
 
321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu
Sophomore Participates
1.4.5  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu   replied to  arkpdx @1.4.2    8 years ago
deleted....

Sorry I missed your reply. 

 
 
 
321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu
Sophomore Participates
1.4.6  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu   replied to  Greg Jones @1.4.3    8 years ago
 All kinds of firepower remain targeted at NK. 
Since when wasn't it ? What's changed ? 
...................................
Kim won't dare to do anything stupid or provocative.

What we think N Korea is still doing right now seems kind of provocative to me so it doesn't seem like trump got the point across well enough. If there is no longer any nuclear threat from N Korea then why are they still working on their nuclear program ?  

This all seems to me like just another "Mission Accomplished"  photo-opt moment for trump.

One huge attribute lacking in president trump is his attention to detail most of the time. He’s great at seeing the big picture but doesn’t seem worth a shit at figuring out or even caring about the details of any of his "solutions" or carrying out his visions/ now called "policies".

We really dont need to look any further than the mess his instantaneously enacted " Zero Tolerance" at the border order caused in separating families without proper planning.

At this time it seems like DNA testing is even needed because of of lack of proper paperwork and tracking of the seperated. What a mess for those people and now our government.  

IMO: This unplanned mess is about as bad as no one reading bills like the ACA before voting on them. Effective efficient results usually involve detailed planning, most things worth doing do. 

trump always seems to lack most if not all the details of implementing his policies. I hope he starts doing better. Like they say, "The devil is always in the details". One in power should deal with that.

But that always complicates everything eh ?

Too bad, that's life and for most of us reality.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.4.8  devangelical  replied to  Tessylo @1.4.7    8 years ago
 
 
 
SteevieGee
Professor Silent
1.4.9  SteevieGee  replied to  Greg Jones @1.4.3    8 years ago

We've had all kinds of firepower directed at NK since the 50s.

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Quiet
1.4.10  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Tacos! @1.4    8 years ago

And all you've ever heard Trump say is "we'll see what happens."

Wrong!  The following is from a tweet of his.

Just landed - a long trip, but everybody can now feel much safer than the day I took office. There is no longer a Nuclear Threat from North Korea. Meeting with Kim Jong Un was an interesting and very positive experience. North Korea has great potential for the future!

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
1.4.11  Trout Giggles  replied to  Paula Bartholomew @1.4.10    8 years ago

And the conservatives will spin this like it's a dreidel

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
1.4.12  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  devangelical @1.4.8    8 years ago

His Marvel Universe villain name would be "The Mandarin Balloon-knot"...

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
1.5  bugsy  replied to  JohnRussell @1    8 years ago

deleted, JR is not the topic.

 
 
 
It Is ME
Masters Participates
2  It Is ME    8 years ago

"An unnamed spokesman for the North Korean Foreign Ministry in a statement accused the U.S. of unilaterally pressuring North Korea to denuclearize."

The "Unnamed Source" just figured that out ? Disappointment

This "Unnamed Source" sounds like Foreign Minister Mohammed Saeed al-Sahhaf. "The U.S. is NOT HERE !" laughing dude

It's not New News Mr. Unnamed Source. Face Palm

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.1  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  It Is ME @2    8 years ago

Oh please. This story is all over the news this morning. In fact , the NK government referred to the US delegation as "gangsters" in a later statement. 

North Korea says high-level talks with US delegation ‘gangster-like’

US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said their talks made “a great deal of progress”, but North Korea has claimed the exac…

 
 
 
It Is ME
Masters Participates
2.1.1  It Is ME  replied to  JohnRussell @2.1    8 years ago

Oh Paleeeeeez !

Did I say the story in itself was false ?

 
 
 
Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו
Junior Quiet
2.1.2  Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו  replied to  It Is ME @2.1.1    8 years ago
Did I say the story in itself was false ?

Wow, that's as fast a retreat as I've ever seen.  

 
 
 
SteevieGee
Professor Silent
2.1.3  SteevieGee  replied to  Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו @2.1.2    8 years ago

Yosemite Sam would have to fire both guns at once to retreat that fast.

 
 
 
It Is ME
Masters Participates
2.1.4  It Is ME  replied to  Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו @2.1.2    8 years ago
Wow, that's as fast a retreat as I've ever seen.

I'm still waiting for an answer. How is it I was the one to retreat again ?

Maybe YOU should read and comprehend my original post too ! Thinking 2

 
 
 
It Is ME
Masters Participates
2.1.7  It Is ME  replied to    8 years ago

I didn't reference any thing more than the NK "Un-named" Source in the article, and they all took it personally. laughing dude

I suppose they ALL root for NK. Digging a whole

 
 
 
321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu
Sophomore Participates
3  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu     8 years ago

North Korea Accuses U.S. Of Betraying The Spirit Of The Recent Summit, Says Current Pompeo Visit Is "Regrettable"

Who cares, trump said the North Korean nuclear threat was over. 

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Quiet
3.1  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu @3    8 years ago

With his known penchant for lying, do you really believe him on this?  Oh wait, you drank the kool aid so of course you do.

 
 
 
321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu
Sophomore Participates
3.1.1  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu   replied to  Paula Bartholomew @3.1    8 years ago
do you really believe him on this?

.....................

Of course I do, I always trust the president of my country. 

.....................

LOL

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Expert
4  Kavika     8 years ago

I'm not sure why anyone would believe anything that NK says. His only weapon are his nukes. I really don't see any senario that he'll give them up. 

The US and the world has been down this path before and it amounted to nothing. I would hope that that  would change but I really don't see it in the near future. 

Hopefully the one thing that I'd like to see NK follow through on immediately  is the return of our soldiers KIA in the Korean war. 

 
 
 
Skrekk
Sophomore Quiet
4.2  Skrekk  replied to  Kavika @4    8 years ago
I'm not sure why anyone would believe anything that NK says.

I'd believe Kim before I'd believe anything Trump says.

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
5  Tacos!    8 years ago
An unnamed spokesman for the North Korean Foreign Ministry

Well, that's helpful. Not.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
5.1  Greg Jones  replied to  Tacos! @5    8 years ago

Apparently a trusted and valuable source in the seeders eyes!

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
5.1.1  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Greg Jones @5.1    8 years ago

Just curious - what do you think would happen to any North Korean official who makes a claim that is in conflict with Kim’s directives?

 
 
 
Old Hermit
Sophomore Silent
5.1.2  Old Hermit  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @5.1.1    8 years ago

Tacos!

An unnamed spokesman for the North Korean Foreign Ministry

Well, that's helpful. Not.

.

Greg Jones replied to Tacos!

Apparently a trusted and valuable source in the seeders eyes!

.

Hal A. Lujah replied to Greg Jones

Just curious - what do you think would happen to any North Korean official who makes a claim that is in conflict with Kim’s directives?

.

No way would any of Kim's people put out info dear leader hadn't OK'd but they even pay a terrible price if they just get ahead of his lead by mistake.

Dam was it just less than two years ago that America had leadership respected world wide.

Our current buffoon in chief is such an embarrassment.

.

Trump raves that Kim Jong Un has 'a great personality,' 'loves his people'
June 12, 2018

President Trump was left with a glowing impression of North Korean leader Kim Jong Un after their summit together in Singapore on Tuesday. "Really, he's got a great personality,"

..................

"He's a funny guy, he's very smart, he's a great negotiator. He loves his people, not that I'm surprised by that, but he loves his people."

Trump stressed that "I understand the past and, you know, nobody has to tell me he's a rough guy. He has to be a rough guy or he has to be a rough person. But we got along very well. He's smart, loves his people, he loves his country."

.

Kim Jong-un orders execution of senior Lieutenant General 'for giving officer colleagues extra food rations'
Jun 28, 2018

A high-ranking military officer has been executed after Kim Jong-un reportedly discovered he was dishing out extra food to colleagues.

Kim Jong-un is said to have been 'irate' when he got wind Lieutenant General Hyon Ju Song had been giving additional rice and corn rations to his troop and their families.

Song, 56, is also alleged to have given instructions for extra fuel to handed out, as well as telling colleagues: ‘We no longer have to suffer and tighten our belts to make rockets or nuclear weapons.’

When this was discovered by Kim, he vowed 'ideological poisoning should be nipped in the bud', according to Daily NK .

..............

Sources added that Song, serving in the Korean People’s Army, was publicly executed after being hit by a rain of 90 bullets - fired by nine military death-row convicts.

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
5.1.3  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Old Hermit @5.1.2    8 years ago

Sources added that Song, serving in the Korean People’s Army, was publicly executed after being hit by a rain of 90 bullets - fired by nine military death-row convicts.

I wonder what ‘death-row’ even means in NK.  Is that a place where they pluck out your fingernails and toenails before you are executed, just to ensure maximum suffering?  It’s not like there’s a legal process to be executed in NK.  It just happens on command.

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Quiet
5.1.4  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @5.1.1    8 years ago

That is easy to answer.  Lock and load then the trigger is pulled.

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
5.1.5  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Paula Bartholomew @5.1.4    8 years ago

In my opinion, if you are a North Korean citizen period, you are on death-row.

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Participates
5.1.6  Thrawn 31  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @5.1.5    8 years ago

Pretty accurate statement. Being alive in North Korea is just waiting to die. 

 
 
 
LynneA
Freshman Silent
6  LynneA    8 years ago

Feeling safer every day...yeah, right!

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
6.1  Greg Jones  replied to  LynneA @6    8 years ago

Calm your fears....Kim is just spouting off for local consumption and knows his bluff has been called. Trump gave up nothing to get this far with the little bastard....and will walk away from the process if NK wants to continue this silly game.

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
6.1.1  MrFrost  replied to  Greg Jones @6.1    8 years ago

And so it begins... Already prepping the spin for, "well the meetings failed, but it's not trumps fault...". 

 
 
 
LynneA
Freshman Silent
6.1.2  LynneA  replied to  Greg Jones @6.1    8 years ago

Except the little 'spouter' is a murdering mongrel with nukes...but hey, let's be friends.  Who needs war games with our allies when you can have a sit down with a dictator!  Mattis is noticably absent.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
6.1.3  Greg Jones  replied to  MrFrost @6.1.1    8 years ago

Well, it appears to be Kimmy's fault. What's Trump supposed to do.

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Participates
6.1.5  Thrawn 31  replied to  Greg Jones @6.1    8 years ago
Trump gave up nothing to get this far with the little bastard

Gave Kim a huge propaganda victory by meeting with him, suspended military exercises in exchange for.... what exactly? Yeah, Trump gave up nothing to get this far, how far are we exactly? 

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Quiet
6.1.6  arkpdx  replied to  Thrawn 31 @6.1.5    8 years ago

I know what he didn't  give up. 

He did give up the sections placed on NK. They are still in effect. 

He didn't give them a planeload of cash.  

He didn't give back 5 terrorist leaders. 

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Participates
6.1.7  Thrawn 31  replied to  arkpdx @6.1.6    8 years ago

You didn't actually list anything we gained...

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Quiet
6.1.8  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  arkpdx @6.1.6    8 years ago

Do you perhaps mean sanctions and not sections?

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Participates
6.1.10  Dulay  replied to  arkpdx @6.1.6    8 years ago
He did give up the sections placed on NK. They are still in effect.

China was clandestinely trading with the NK and is now back to trading with them openly and blatantly. Since China is their #1 trade partner, what other nations do is almost irrelevant. 

BTFW, Russia stepped up and NEVER stopped trading with NK. 

 
 
 
DRHunk
Freshman Silent
6.1.11  DRHunk  replied to  arkpdx @6.1.6    8 years ago

He did give up decades of policy to not meet with NK (As it elevates their position as a recognized and stable country)

He did give up Joint Operations training which NK always hated (Making our security in the region weaker)

He did give up his trust to the American People (Claiming success and a de-nuclearized NK)

We gained 0 but actually gave up a lot.

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
6.1.12  MrFrost  replied to  Greg Jones @6.1.3    8 years ago
What's Trump supposed to do.

Um, not say stupid shit like, "I trust him!". What a fucking idiot. 

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
7  MrFrost    8 years ago

WINNING!!!!!!!!!! LOL!

 
 
 
SteevieGee
Professor Silent
7.1  SteevieGee  replied to  MrFrost @7    8 years ago

They're already building a shelf in the lobby of Trump tower for that Nobel prize.

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Quiet
7.1.1  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  SteevieGee @7.1    8 years ago

I will bet it is stamped with MADE IN CHINA.

 
 
 
Raven Wing
Professor Participates
7.1.2  Raven Wing   replied to  Paula Bartholomew @7.1.1    8 years ago

Thumbs Up 2

 
 
 
SteevieGee
Professor Silent
7.1.3  SteevieGee  replied to  Paula Bartholomew @7.1.1    8 years ago

I will bet it is stamped with MADE IN CHINA.

It will also be made of steel so he'll have to pay a big fat tariff.

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Quiet
7.1.4  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  SteevieGee @7.1.3    8 years ago

laughing dude

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Participates
8  Thrawn 31    8 years ago

Okay for real, does anyone actually think anything of substance is going to come of all this? Like does anyone here REALLY think North Korea is going to disarm? 

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Quiet
8.1  arkpdx  replied to  Thrawn 31 @8    8 years ago

Do you really think Iran stopped working on getting the bomb

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Participates
8.1.1  Thrawn 31  replied to  arkpdx @8.1    8 years ago

Yes I do. Honestly I don't think they were ever seriously working on it to begin with. The perception and ability to do so sure, but actually working towards a real test, eh, not so much. They know what a successful test would mean for them, and as such there is no reason to actually do it. Now, if we or anyone else were to attack, then they would have every reason to push for a bomb ASAP. 

At any rate, do you have anything to say regarding North Korea, or are you just going to continue to deflect in order to "defend" the terrible negotiations skills of the dip shit in chief? 

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Quiet
8.1.2  arkpdx  replied to  Thrawn 31 @8.1.1    8 years ago
Yes I do.

Great!  Hey I got some land I am trying to get rid of .It has been flooded since the end of the last Ice Age but it should be visible as soon as the next one happens. 

defend" the terrible negotiations skills of the dip shit in chief

I am not defending Obama's The Appeaser. Oh wait just because he didn't give up everything we were trying for and gave the North Koreans everything they wanted and more his negotiation skills are less than acceptable. 

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Participates
8.1.3  Thrawn 31  replied to  arkpdx @8.1.2    8 years ago
Hey I got some land I am trying to get rid of .It has been flooded since the end of the last Ice Age but it should be visible as soon as the next one happens. 

Nah I am good, I already own as many properties as I wish. 

I am not defending Obama's The Appeaser.

Yawn, again, got anything even remotely interesting to say? Deflection is so boring. 

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
8.1.4  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  arkpdx @8.1    8 years ago
Do you really think Iran stopped working on getting the bomb

With Iran we got concrete oversight, verification of disarmament, the ability to inspect all nuclear facilities and their giving up of their centrifuges capable of creating weapons grade nuclear material. It was a compromise that wasn't just brokered by the US but was the P5+1 (the permanent members of the United Nations Security Council —the United States, the United Kingdom, Russia, France, and China—plus Germany) and the European Union.

The supposed "cash payments" were court ordered for money owed and the rest was simply giving them access to their own money and assets that had been frozen. Obviously part of the deal was going to encompass the returning of their assets for good behavior and the promise not to pursue nuclear weapons for at least a decade. We got something tangible in the Iran deal, we got nothing but empty promises with zero allowance for oversight or verification in exchange for global recognition (which was Kim's primary goal) and giving up military readiness training with our allies South Korea.

Even if Trump reverse and reinstitutes the training exercises as NK breaks their flimsy promise, Kim already won, he got what he wanted, to be seen as an equal to the United States, to stand on a stage with an equal number of NK flags mixed with US flags being greeted warmly by the President. It was one of the things previously withheld by every former President as an incentive for actual good behavior, Trump handed it away before discussions were even begun. I suppose a meeting with Trump isn't really worth all that much, apparently you can get one for just the cost of a membership at Mar-a-Lago.

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Participates
8.1.5  Thrawn 31  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @8.1.4    8 years ago
Kim already won, he got what he wanted, to be seen as an equal to the United States, to stand on a stage with an equal number of NK flags mixed with US flags being greeted warmly by the President.

Exactly. That was his primary goal in all of this, the global recognition. Standing on stage with the world's lone super power, shaking hands, and exchanging remarks as an equal. Something neither his father, or grandfather, was able to achieve. Some Trump supporters do not seem to get that. 

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Quiet
8.1.6  arkpdx  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @8.1.4    8 years ago
With Iran we got concrete oversight, verification of disarmament

Sure we did .In some cases we have to give them a month's was time for them to hide their work and in other cases we just ask them if they are competing and take their word for it 

returning of their assets for good behavior

Except we gave them everything up front before any bad behavior and noncompliance could be detected

and the promise not to pursue nuclear weapons for at least a decade.

And you believe that too. Do you still write to Santa too? 

I thought the purpose of the negotiation and the impositioon if sanctionswas to keep Iran from getting nuclear weapons at all,  ever

We got something tangible in the Iran deal

We got bupkis!

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Participates
8.1.7  Thrawn 31  replied to  arkpdx @8.1.6    8 years ago

Still waiting for you to list the positives of fat ass's North Korea negotiations...

 
 
 
Skrekk
Sophomore Quiet
8.1.8  Skrekk  replied to  arkpdx @8.1.6    8 years ago
Sure we did .In some cases we have to give them a month's was time for them to hide their work and in other cases we just ask them if they are competing and take their word for it

Sounds like you have no clue how the NPT's Additional Protocol works in other countries and you have no clue about the continuous monitoring and random IAEA inspections of nuclear sites.    And apparently you've made no effort whatsoever to learn about those things, all you've done is read Faux News and Breitbart.

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Quiet
8.1.9  arkpdx  replied to  Thrawn 31 @8.1.7    8 years ago

One meeting is not a negotiation. How long and how meetings were held with the Iranians? Trump has one meeting and you expect everything. We got more meetings, more talks. Compared to the Iran fiasco we gave up little and did get some return .

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Participates
8.1.10  Thrawn 31  replied to  arkpdx @8.1.9    8 years ago

... Seriously? That's it?

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
8.1.11  Trout Giggles  replied to  arkpdx @8.1.9    8 years ago

but he said NK was giving up its weapons!

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Participates
8.1.12  Dulay  replied to  arkpdx @8.1.9    8 years ago
One meeting is not a negotiation.

There have been four meetings if you include the Trump Kabuki summit. 

Trump has one meeting and you expect everything. We got more meetings, more talks.

Trump CLAIMED everything. Go read his tweet. 

BTFW, Clinton NEVER met with NK and got a hell of a lot more...

Compared to the Iran fiasco 

Bullshit. Stop slinging debunked crap about the Iran deal if you want to retain any credibility. 

we gave up little and did get some return .

Trump gave Kim everything that he wanted and got NOTHING. 

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Expert
8.1.13  Ender  replied to  arkpdx @8.1.9    8 years ago

The trump administration has had three meetings with NK, that we know of.

With Iran trump just pulled out completely. Now we have nothing. Years of work and negotiations down the drain. You all complain about them getting their own money back yet what trump has done is give them their money back for free. Now we have no way to check or inspect anything. Dumbest move one could make. I bet the extreme elements there are praising his stupid decision.

They are correct, trump gave NK exactly what they wanted. Now little dictator has his flags center stage next to US flags and plenty of propaganda to feed his people.

The so called art of the deal is a scam (just like his phony school that he was sued over). trump has gotten played by everyone. We are now out of any negotiations with Iran, he is treating our long trusted allies like shit and now I would think South Korea feels like we abandoned them.

And still, somehow, you all think that is winning...

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
8.2  Trout Giggles  replied to  Thrawn 31 @8    8 years ago
Like does anyone here REALLY think North Korea is going to disarm?

fuck no

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Participates
8.2.1  Thrawn 31  replied to  Trout Giggles @8.2    8 years ago

As long as China is powerful I agree. It seems to me that the North Koreans are more afraid of China than they are of the US or South Korea. They know that ultimately, China sees them as a vassal and little else, and the only thing that maintains their independence are the tens of thousands of American military forces staged throughout Asia. The threat of a hot war on their border, one that the Chinese will be forced to get involved in in some fashion. That is the North Korean defense strategy. 

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Quiet
8.3  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Thrawn 31 @8    8 years ago

Only the deplorables do.

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Expert
9  Kavika     8 years ago

Trump Suggests China Might Be Interfering In North Korean Talks.

Well if you want another countries help and then slap them with billions in tariffs there just might be a back lash, dontca think...DUH

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Participates
10  Thrawn 31    8 years ago
Kim already won, he got what he wanted, to be seen as an equal to the United States, to stand on a stage with an equal number of NK flags mixed with US flags being greeted warmly by the President.

Exactly. That was his primary goal in all of this, the global recognition. Standing on stage with the world's lone super power, shaking hands, and exchanging remarks as an equal. Something neither his father, or grandfather, was able to achieve. Some Trump supporters do not seem to get that. 

 
 
 
96WS6
Junior Silent
11  96WS6    8 years ago

I wouldn't expect you to come up with any factual rebuttals LMFAO!

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Quiet
11.1  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  96WS6 @11    8 years ago

Who is "you" as your reply is not aimed at a previous comment?

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
11.1.1  MrFrost  replied to  Paula Bartholomew @11.1    8 years ago
Who is "you" as your reply is not aimed at a previous comment?

Well, Paula, talking to ones self is a sure sign of mental illness.. ;)

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Quiet
11.1.2  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  MrFrost @11.1.1    8 years ago

Hey, I have to get some intelligent conversation somewhere.Wink

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
12  MrFrost    8 years ago

y4u2p.jpg

 
 

Who is online



81 visitors