╌>

Hannity Guest: Science Proves Trump Is The 'Most Sound-Minded' President Ever

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  tessylo  •  8 years ago  •  116 comments

Hannity Guest: Science Proves Trump Is The 'Most Sound-Minded' President Ever

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T




Politics

Hannity Guest: Science Proves Trump Is The 'Most Sound-Minded' President Ever



  Ed Mazza, HuffPost   3 hours ago  







Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2  JohnRussell    8 years ago

This is an amazing article. On the day that the walls are closing in on Trump from within his own administration, with claims that he is mentally erratic and not fit for office, Gina Loudon says he may have the soundest mind ever. 

Let's look for a brief moment at Dr. Gina Loudon's background, and why she might have a slight predisposition (lol) to praise Trump like this.

She is considered a founding member of the Tea Party movement.

She was a founding writer for Breitbart News. 

She was a national media surrogate for Donald Trump in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.

She was a delegate to the Republican National Convention in 2016. 

She was a close associate of Andrew Breitbart.

She is an avid supporter of gun rights.

She is a member at Mar-A-Lago, the Florida resort owned by Donald Trump. 

wikipedia

Do you think there is a slight chance she is not objective? 

Sean Hannity's show has become self-parody. 

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Guide
2.2  Sparty On  replied to  JohnRussell @2    8 years ago
Do you think there is a slight chance she is not objective? 

Objective?    She's not objective enough for you?   Suddenly the left wants objective?

Now THAT is hilarious.   The bias coming from the left wing media the last two years has been pervasive and heinous.

Now you want objective?    Thx for the laugh John

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.2.3  JohnRussell  replied to  Sparty On @2.2    8 years ago

I wish your comments were funny, then they would at least serve a purpose. 

Anything that comes out of this woman's mouth, given her background and position in the Trump administration, can be seen as no more than a paid political announcement for President* Trump. 

For Hannity to being this laughable nonsense on to a "news" channel is pathetic. 

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Guide
2.2.4  Sparty On  replied to  JohnRussell @2.2.3    8 years ago
I wish your comments were funny, then they would at least serve a purpose. 

Good, they weren't intended to be funny but rather factual, which they are.

Too bad for the narrative you're pushing .... such is life eh?

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.2.6  JohnRussell  replied to  Sparty On @2.2.4    8 years ago

Seed an article about left wing bias then. 

This article is about a Trump lackey, who works for his administration, feigning some sort of insight into the soundness of his mind, while at the same time saying her comments destroy Woodward's book. She has a resume which makes her COMPLETELY unable to be objective about Trump. It is actually ludicrous. 

You can't address the actual topic so you bleat about "left wing bias"

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Guide
2.2.7  Sparty On  replied to  JohnRussell @2.2.6    8 years ago
Seed an article about left wing bias then. 

No need to.   There is always a plethora of them being posted here on NT.

You need to pay attention to notice them though John ......

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
2.2.9  Split Personality  replied to  Tessylo @2.2.1    8 years ago
Gina studied design, communications, and psychology in college. She eventually earned two master's degrees and a Ph.D. Dr. Loudon wrote her dissertation on her own theory contrasting Sternberg's theory of love with the Maslovian hierarchical needs, and then applied it, hermeneutically, to existing data on relationship. Her original findings in her research are still being used today.

Her first master's degree, from St. Louis University, was withheld from her for what she believed were political reasons, but it was eventually granted to her, years later. This experience opened her eyes to political and social injustice, and solidified her political perspective.

Fielding GU reviews are "mixed", on a scale of five there are as many 1's as there are 5's or people who wish they could give a higher rating.  It's an online "distance learning" institute with one small building in California.  Unlike most PHD programs which last five to nine years with extensive contact with professors, Fielding gives education and "life experience" credits to shorten the track to 3 years at a cost of $9,560.00 per term. So in essence $$60,000.00

From Linked In

Education

  • Fielding Graduate University

    Degree Name Ph.D.

    Field Of Study Human Development

    Dates attended or expected graduation 2011 – 2012

  • Fielding Graduate University

    Degree Name MA

    Field Of Study Human and Organizational Development

    Dates attended or expected graduation 2011 – 2011

  • Helias High School

    Dates attended or expected graduation 2011 – 2011

  • Saint Louis University

    Degree Name MA

    Field Of Study Counseling Education

    Dates attended or expected graduation 2011 – 2011

    Activities and Societies: Magna Cum Laude

  • William Woods University

    Degree Name BA

    Field Of Study Psychology and Education

    Dates attended or expected graduation 2011 – 2011

    Activities and Societies: President, Psi Chi National Psychological Honor Society: Distinguished Scholar in Psychology; Recording Secretary, Alpha Chi Omega National Women's Fraternity; Vice President, Beta Theta Pi Little Sisters.

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
2.2.10  Split Personality  replied to  Split Personality @2.2.9    8 years ago

This is an interesting read about this "ultra famous family".

 
 
 
Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו
Junior Quiet
2.2.12  Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו  replied to  Split Personality @2.2.9    8 years ago

A psych major.  That's a joke in and of itself. 

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
2.2.13  Trout Giggles  replied to  Tessylo @2.2.1    8 years ago

  • TV Analyst on Fox News, Fox Business, others in politics, business, psychology.

    TV News Host/News Analyst
    December 2009 – Present (8 years 10 months) Fox News, Fox Business, more.

    Dr. Gina specializes in the interplay of psychology, politics, and business. She holds two master's degrees and a Ph.D. in psychological/business fields (Human and Organizational Development), she also has extensive campaign experience that lends insider knowledge to her on camera analysis.

There ya go, Tessy. She's not  like a real doctor who can set your broken ankle

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
2.2.14  Trout Giggles  replied to  Split Personality @2.2.10    8 years ago

"Ultra-famous"?

I never heard of her until I opened this seed

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
2.2.15  Trout Giggles  replied to  Split Personality @2.2.9    8 years ago
Unlike most PHD programs which last five to nine years with extensive contact with professors, Fielding gives education and "life experience" credits to shorten the track to 3 years at a cost of $9,560.00 per term. So in essence $$60,000.00

So she payed for her PhD for $60k and fast tracked it. What did she do....phone it in?

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
2.2.16  Split Personality  replied to  Split Personality @2.2.10    8 years ago

The only famous Loudon I know of

is Loudon Wainwright III

patience

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
2.2.20  Trout Giggles  replied to  Tessylo @2.2.18    8 years ago
I kinda figured she wouldn't have an M.D. behind her name.  

That takes $200K and 12 years of school

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
2.3  TᵢG  replied to  JohnRussell @2    8 years ago
Do you think there is a slight chance she is not objective? 

In political matters, partisans are -by definition- not objective.

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
2.4  Jack_TX  replied to  JohnRussell @2    8 years ago
Do you think there is a slight chance she is not objective? 

More than a slight chance.

I, for one, am very glad to see this healthy skepticism when it comes to examining the source of comments or other supposed data.

I do hope this practice will become the norm.  I presume this means we'll start to take people like Paul Krugman or Steffie Woolhandler with a huge grain of salt.

 
 
 
Raven Wing
Professor Participates
2.5  Raven Wing   replied to  JohnRussell @2    8 years ago
She is a member at Mar-A-Lago, the Florida resort owned by Donald Trump.

And.....perhaps.....she is also one of the women that Trump has graced with his 'sound' one track mind a few times while 'playing golf' at his favorite inter.....er..... golf course.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3  JohnRussell    8 years ago

Wait, stop the presses! Hold The phone!  Her book is based on "knowing President Trump and his family" !  Now I believe her. Makes No Sense

My new book, DESTROYS ’s drivel about . My book is based on solid scientific research, fact, & knowing President Trump & his family. His book is based on gossip, inuendo, & partisan fantasy.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
4  devangelical    8 years ago

I feel a little bit sorry for the FOX women that weren't able to cash in on past sexual harassment payoffs and had to settle for book promotion deals.  

 
 
 
Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו
Junior Quiet
4.1  Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו  replied to  devangelical @4    8 years ago

Yeah, #metoo -- laughing dude

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
5  Tacos!    8 years ago
“My book actually uses science and real data and true psychological theory to explain why it is quite possible that this president is the most sound-minded person to ever occupy the White House.”

Finally, we can put this issue to bed. I'm glad that's settled.

 
 
 
Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו
Junior Quiet
5.1  Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו  replied to  Tacos! @5    8 years ago
we can put this issue to bed.

Yeah, the latest issue of Rightwing Clown News. 

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
5.1.1  Tacos!  replied to  Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו @5.1    8 years ago

[No Value]

 
 
 
epistte
Junior Participates
5.1.2  epistte  replied to  Tacos! @5.1.1    8 years ago
Removed for context

How exactly are us secular leftists anti-science? Bring out your strawmen to support your revisionist claims. 

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
5.1.3  Tacos!  replied to  epistte @5.1.2    8 years ago

Tsk. Don't derail the seed. I hear people frown on that.

It does my heart good to see you worked up over nothing.

 
 
 
epistte
Junior Participates
5.1.4  epistte  replied to  Tacos! @5.1.3    8 years ago
Tsk. Don't derail the seed. I hear people frown on that. It does my heart good to see you worked up over nothing.

You made the previous claim that lefties are anti-science, so either prove it or admit that it is a lie.

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
5.1.5  Tacos!  replied to  epistte @5.1.4    8 years ago

I will do neither. I have already proved it in other seeds anyway. This seed is not about that. It was a throwaway jab offered in jest. [deleted]

 
 
 
epistte
Junior Participates
5.1.6  epistte  replied to  Tacos! @5.1.5    8 years ago
I will do neither. I have already proved it in other seeds anyway. This seed is not about that. It was a throwaway jab offered in jest. Removed for context

If you had any proof to support your previous claim you would post it. You know that you have nothing and you are trying to deflect from a claim that you know is partisan BS. 

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
5.1.7  Tacos!  replied to  epistte @5.1.6    8 years ago
(deleted)
 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Silent
5.1.8  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Tacos! @5.1.7    8 years ago

Maybe

You should unbunch your panties,

she's just asking you to back up your assertion 

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
5.1.9  Tacos!  replied to  igknorantzrulz @5.1.8    8 years ago

And my answer was that she can pound sand. I could post 500 links backing up my assertion and she would reject every last one. She is incapable of conceding a truth no matter how many links you post. It's a waste of time.

 
 
 
epistte
Junior Participates
5.1.10  epistte  replied to  Tacos! @5.1.9    8 years ago
And my answer was that she can pound sand. I could post 500 links backing up my assertion and she would reject every last one. She is incapable of conceding a truth no matter how many links you post. It's a waste of time.

The fact that I can and will refute every one of your hypothetical 500 links should be a strong hint that they aren't true, despite the fact that you may agree with them.  That is the critical difference between empirical logic and emotional belief.  You need to learn to stop being emotionally invested in your arguments and instead follow the truth wherever it takes you. 

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
5.1.11  Tacos!  replied to  epistte @5.1.10    8 years ago

[Removed]

 
 
 
epistte
Junior Participates
5.1.12  epistte  replied to  Tacos! @5.1.11    8 years ago

My use of the pronouns you and your are proof that I was replying to you, despite your very attempt to deflect.

Your personal attack of claiming that I am mentally ill and talking to myself is noted. The fact that you chose to reply with a personal attack is a capitulation of the argument.

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
5.1.13  Tacos!  replied to  epistte @5.1.12    8 years ago
My use of the pronouns you and your are proof that I was replying to you

[Deleted]

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
5.1.14  cjcold  replied to  epistte @5.1.4    8 years ago

Only 6% of scientists claim to be conservative/republican. For the most part that 6% are all social scientists (not actual scientists who do research using the scientific method).

 
 
 
epistte
Junior Participates
5.1.15  epistte  replied to  Tacos! @5.1.13    8 years ago

What juicy reply from Tacos did I miss?

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
5.1.16  Tacos!  replied to  epistte @5.1.15    8 years ago
What juicy reply from Tacos did I miss?

Apparently the laughing emoji is "juicy" and needs to be deleted. You obviously have an ally with power.

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
5.1.17  Tacos!  replied to  epistte @5.1.10    8 years ago
The fact that I can and will refute every one of your hypothetical 500 links

A promise made without even seeing them. No protests of "not at all Tacos! I promise to have an open mind on the topic." I rest my case. 

 
 
 
epistte
Junior Participates
5.1.18  epistte  replied to  Tacos! @5.1.16    8 years ago
Apparently the laughing emoji is "juicy" and needs to be deleted. You obviously have an ally with power.

I didn't see what you posted, hence my previous reply. Obviously, I also didn't report it. 

 
 
 
epistte
Junior Participates
5.1.19  epistte  replied to  Tacos! @5.1.17    8 years ago
A promise made without even seeing them. No protests of "not at all Tacos! I promise to have an open mind on the topic." I rest my case. 

Your claim that the left is anti-science is all that I needed to read. The progressive left embraces science, but not your strawman version of it. 

 
 
 
Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו
Junior Quiet
5.1.20  Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו  replied to  epistte @5.1.2    8 years ago
How exactly are us secular leftists anti-science?

That's how it is in upside-down rightwing reverse world, Tess. 

 
 
 
Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו
Junior Quiet
5.1.21  Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו  replied to  Tacos! @5.1.9    8 years ago
I could post 500 links backing up my assertion and she would reject every last one.

And she'd be correct on every damn one of them.  

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
5.1.25  Tacos!  replied to  epistte @5.1.19    8 years ago

[Deleted]

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
5.1.27  Tacos!  replied to  Tessylo @5.1.22    8 years ago
Stop trolling and insulting Tacos.

You keep accusing me of these things and I have asked you to explain what you are talking about. I can't stop it if I don't know what it is.

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
5.1.28  Tacos!  replied to  Tessylo @5.1.26    8 years ago
You obviously don't know dick about science so again KNOCK IT OFF!

Is this serious? I have been trying to not extend this part of the conversation, but you literally just attacked me for not backing up what I said. This is you:

He can't back it up that's why he keeps ducking, dodging and deflecting 

[deleted]

 
 
 
Phoenyx13
Sophomore Silent
6  Phoenyx13    8 years ago
“My book actually uses science and real data and true psychological theory to explain why it is quite possible that this president is the most sound-minded person to ever occupy the White House.”

it seems the conservative minded have to do everything possible to convince the population that President Trump is "sane" - makes one wonder why they can't let Trump do that himself ? this constant defending of Trump and the need for this constant defending seems to be troubling...

 
 
 
Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו
Junior Quiet
7  Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו    8 years ago

And, here all this time I thought trumpsters hated it when Scumbag's mental status was analyzed by "professionals" who hadn't examined him.  That must have changed when some poser finally came up with adequate BS for them to use. 

 
 
 
lady in black
Professor Silent
8  lady in black    8 years ago

And this bubble headed twit knows this how.....what a moronic imbecile.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
9  Trout Giggles    8 years ago

Anybody think those boobs are real?

 
 
 
epistte
Junior Participates
9.2  epistte  replied to  Trout Giggles @9    8 years ago
Anybody think those boobs are real?

Real silicone or real saline?

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Silent
9.2.1  igknorantzrulz  replied to  epistte @9.2    8 years ago
Anybody think those boobs are real?

If you're referring to She and Donny,

unfortunately, they are.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
9.2.2  Trout Giggles  replied to  epistte @9.2    8 years ago

LOL!

Does it matter?

 
 
 
epistte
Junior Participates
9.2.3  epistte  replied to  Trout Giggles @9.2.2    8 years ago
LOL! Does it matter?

No. it doesn't really matter.  It was just obvious snark.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
9.2.4  Trout Giggles  replied to  epistte @9.2.3    8 years ago

Giggle

 
 
 
321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu
Sophomore Participates
10  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu     8 years ago

Trump Is The 'Most Sound-Minded' President Ever

Sure...

IMO: If president trump does not pay more attention the the details of what he's undertaking this wont be the last thing to blow up in his face and against our best interests.

Good Luck America !

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Silent
10.1  igknorantzrulz  replied to  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu @10    8 years ago
this wont be the last thing to blow up in his face and against our best interests.

Well, right after Putin

 
 
 
Raven Wing
Professor Participates
11  Raven Wing     8 years ago

Trump is the most sound-minded President since the Neanderthals. 

However, I don't think that's being fair to the Neanderthals. 

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Silent
12  igknorantzrulz    8 years ago

Deafinitely

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
13  MrFrost    8 years ago
'Most Sound-Minded'

They misspelled, "mentally ill". 

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Participates
14  Thrawn 31    8 years ago
My book actually uses science and real data and true psychological theory

Heh, oh those soft sciences and soft scientists, they try so hard to pretend they are on an equal footing with the hard. 

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Expert
16  Kavika     8 years ago

The good doctor is a graduate of the Betsy DeVos home schooling educational system. 

Doctor Feel Good.

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
17  MrFrost    8 years ago

Her unplundered vagina breeds mites. 

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
18  MrFrost    8 years ago

obamaverystablegenius.jpg

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
19  MrFrost    8 years ago

seanhannitysuckssign.jpg

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Expert
20  Kavika     8 years ago

ae769d1325f9914691574b962fac372e--anti-trump-funny-trump-humor.jpg

 
 

Who is online




107 visitors