╌>

The strange testimony of Julie Swetnick

  

Category:  News & Politics

By:  vic-eldred  •  8 years ago  •  152 comments

The strange testimony of Julie Swetnick

?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmediadc.brightspotcdn
Julie Swetnick


Yesterday Michael Avenatti's client gave an exclusive interview to NBC. Despite her lurid claims of drugging and raping at parties attended bt Brett Kavanaugh in a sworn declaration "under penalty of perjury" as Avenatti likes to remind us, Ms Sewtnick calmly walked it all back.

When faced with a direct question by Kate Snow "Did you see Brett Kavanaugh spike a girls punch"?  Swetnick replied " “Well I saw—I saw him giving red solo cups to quite a few girls during that time frame, and there was grain punch at those parties. … I saw him around the punch—I won’t say bowls, the punch containers. I don’t know what he did, but I saw him by them.”
She also walked back her claims of "rape trains" now saying that she saw groups of boys near doors and "assumed" they were rape trains!
As for Kavanaugh committing "rape", She said " “I cannot specifically say that he was one of the ones who assaulted me, but before this happened to me at that party, I saw Brett Kavanaugh there, I saw Mark Judge there, and they were hanging about the area where I started to feel disoriented”.

Neither NBC nor the liberal media have digressed from her original "sworn declaration" to the obvious walking back of her once explicit allegations, but we do recall how Senate democrats were reluctant to use them. Btw Ms Swetnick also has a history of legal disputes:

"WASHINGTON (AP) — Julie Swetnick, one of the women who has publicly accused Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct, has an extensive history of involvement in legal disputes, including a lawsuit in which an ex-employer accused her of falsifying her college and work history on her job application.

Legal documents from Maryland, Oregon and Florida provide a partial picture of a woman who stepped into the media glare amid the battle over Kavanaugh’s nomination for the nation’s highest court.
Court records reviewed by The Associated Press show Swetnick has been involved in at least six legal cases over the past 25 years. Along with the lawsuit filed by a former employer in November 2000, the cases include a personal injury suit she filed in 1994 against the Washington, D.C., regional transit authority."

https://www.apnews.com/bccc4dd598df4e71bbf6c40ff4830373

Then there is her former boyfriend Richard Vinneccy, who has publicly stated that Ms Swetnick never mentioned anything about being raped to him in all the time he knew her. He also describes her character and of how she threatened to kill his unborn baby as well as him:


https://video.foxnews.com/v/5843107119001/?#sp=show-clips

Interview with Laura Ingraham on October 1


Senator Bill Cassidy is now calling for "a criminal referral to be sent to the DOJ/FBI 
regarding the apparently false affidavit signed by Julie Swetnick that was submitted to the Senate by @MichaelAvenatti" now that Swetnick has contradicted her "firm recollections" involving Brett Kavanaugh.








Article is LOCKED by author/seeder
[]
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1  author  Vic Eldred    8 years ago

"NBC News has had to admit that they are unable to independently corroborate the claims of Julie Swetnick, unable to independently corroborate Swetnick's claims and has not spoken with anybody who says they saw Swetnick at parties with Kavanaugh! They can't find anybody that can place her there!".......Rush Limbaugh

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
1.1  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Vic Eldred @1    8 years ago

Just a lying witch trying to get her 15 minutes of fame trying to cash in somebody else's pain! That does not even take into account the scum bag shyster representing her.

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
1.1.2  Ed-NavDoc  replied to    8 years ago

Yep.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2  author  Vic Eldred    8 years ago

I submit, for the education of Senators Lisa Murkowski and Susan Collins, the credibility of allegations made against Judge Kavanaugh

 
 
 
It Is ME
Masters Participates
3  It Is ME    8 years ago

What was Julie doing at a party with underaged kids anyway.

Was she just playing the "Cougar" or the "MILF" of the party those 10 times ?

 
 
 
cms5
Freshman Silent
4  cms5    8 years ago

It appears that Ms. Swetnick and her Attorney have some issues to address. Here's a statement from someone who ran as a Democrat in 1996 in Maryland regarding her allegations. Here's a letter from Sen. Grassley to the 10 Democratic members of the SJC mentioning the NBC interview.

 
 
 
Nowhere Man
Junior Participates
4.1  Nowhere Man  replied to  cms5 @4    8 years ago

AS far as I'm concerned, those two links, when read, damn this whole farce as a Democrat hit piece...

There is NO other way to look at it.

Back door 11th hour accusation,

Refusal to participate in any real investigation,

Definitely a democrat slime job...

 
 
 
Spikegary
Junior Quiet
5  Spikegary    8 years ago

These women do a grave disservice to women who have actually been assaulted/raped.  I have a family member that has survived not only one but two sexual assaults-real assaaults, not just imagined or suddenly remembered.  These people dilute the #MeToo message and movement with their silly partisan antics.  I too hope that they are investigated and charged for their false 'sworn statements'.

 
 
 
cms5
Freshman Silent
5.1  cms5  replied to  Spikegary @5    8 years ago

All claims of sexual abuse should be investigated. Due Process.

While Ms. Swetnick may have experienced some form of sexual abuse, without corroboration pointing explicitly towards Judge Kavanaugh and Mark Judge - their names need to be cleared. Fairness. How can that be accomplished? Surely we do not want to discourage women from stepping forward. We do not want to minimize sexual abuse victims or survivors.

I am a survivor. A hesitant member of the Me Too Movement. I believe in due process and fairness.

 
 
 
Colour Me Free
Senior Silent
6  Colour Me Free    8 years ago
“Well I saw—I saw him giving red solo cups to quite a few girls during that time frame, and there was grain punch at those parties. … I saw him around the punch—I won’t say bowls, the punch containers. I don’t know what he did, but I saw him by them.”
“I cannot specifically say that he was one of the ones who assaulted me, but before this happened to me at that party, I saw Brett Kavanaugh there, I saw Mark Judge there, and they were hanging about the area where I started to feel disoriented”.

Hang the damn'd bastards!

Is anyone surprised that a client of Avenatti (for President?) client has to withdraw the 'story' she has been claiming?  Now the crux of her accusations is that Kavanaugh was seen handing out red solo cups to girls (now that is a vivid memory of assault) or that she saw Kavanaugh and Judge at a party that she became disoriented at? 

Has stress impacted her vivid memories … or does it have to do with her desiring 15 minutes of fame?  What would she have to gain by lieing, one might ask - how about the hero worship and sucking in of the anti Kavanaugh people for being so brave by telling her story?

I think the 'gullible' Trump supporters should be demanding an apology from the many on the left that jumped on the band wagon and cheered 'this woman' on, as well as cheering for Avenatti as being the 'man' to fight for the left … [snicker]

 
 
 
KDMichigan
Junior Quiet
6.1  KDMichigan  replied to  Colour Me Free @6    8 years ago

Supposedly Christine Blasey Ford's ex boyfriend submitted a letter that he witnessed her coaching a friend to pass a polygraph test. This goes against what she said in testimony. In the six years he was with her she had no fear of flying, she lived in a 500 sq foot apartment with one door having no trauma and her never mentioning being raped or Kavanaugh during that time frame is understandable seeing I'm starting to believe she made that up.

Of course no coverage by CNN on this letter just right wing sites.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Guide
6.1.1  Sparty On  replied to  KDMichigan @6.1    8 years ago

Yeah i read that ..... i suppose he is lying as well ..... /s

This is not going to end well for Ford or the Dems who sacrificed her ......

 
 
 
Colour Me Free
Senior Silent
6.1.2  Colour Me Free  replied to  KDMichigan @6.1    8 years ago

I have not seen anything about that yet .. have to look it up..

I keep reading that most everyone believes that something did happen to Ford, just do not believe it was of Kavanaugh's doing... then the other side of the divide calls Kavanaugh every name in the book, believe all allegations against him - while cheering for his destruction...……….. 

Truth be damn'd .. at all costs Kavanaugh needs to be stopped from taking away Roe v Wade or for his stand on the 2nd amendment?  A father of a victim of the Stoneman Douglas mass shooting even tried to claim that Kavanaugh snubbed him by pulling his hand away when the man said that he was the father of a murder victim … all of which is not true - but still I see individuals referring to the incident in their posts as a black mark against Kavanaugh..

I do not understand the 'at any cost' mentality...

 

 
 
 
KDMichigan
Junior Quiet
6.1.6  KDMichigan  replied to  Tessylo @6.1.3    8 years ago
Proof and citations please. 

Well as you tell everyone else, You look it up.

Funny that your so called biased right wing sources report on the false allegations against Kavanaugh huh?

I didn't want him to get the nomination but now I do just so I can witness all the triggering snowflakes. jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
KDMichigan
Junior Quiet
6.1.9  KDMichigan  replied to  Colour Me Free @6.1.2    8 years ago

I just read his letter.

Was interesting, he broke off relationship after he caught her cheating on him. After he broke off relationship she racked up his credit card. She denied it but after he threatened to turn her in she payed it back.

Now this has nothing to do with the allegations against Kavanaugh but it does shed some light on Cristine Fords well scrubbed personal life, and yes she had all her info scrubbed from the internet before coming forward.

He names the friend who she coached on a polygraph test and of course this life long friend denies this. I think it could be easily verified by when her friend took a polygraph for the FBI.

 
 
 
Colour Me Free
Senior Silent
6.1.10  Colour Me Free  replied to  KDMichigan @6.1.9    8 years ago

I just did as well .. found it on National Review …

I think it could be easily verified by when her friend took a polygraph for the FBI.

Agreed... 

.. this mess just keeps getting deeper and deeper in the mud .. wonder if the FBI will be following up with the X .. or if it will be disregarded as they are investigating accusations against Kavanaugh?

 
 
 
Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו
Junior Quiet
6.1.11  Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו  replied to  Colour Me Free @6.1.10    8 years ago
this mess just keeps getting deeper and deeper in the mud

That's what happens when scumbags at the National Review keep shitting into the mix.  

 
 
 
Colour Me Free
Senior Silent
6.1.12  Colour Me Free  replied to  Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו @6.1.11    8 years ago

I see you are as cheery as even .. sorry you do not care for the National Review .. I am certain that soon enough a site like Vox will have an opinion piece written by an expert to begin the discrediting of the X boyfriend... stay positive : )

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
6.1.13  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  KDMichigan @6.1    8 years ago
Supposedly Christine Blasey Ford's ex boyfriend submitted a letter that he witnessed her coaching a friend to pass a polygraph test.

Unless someone beats me to it, that will be my topic for tomorrow

 
 
 
KDMichigan
Junior Quiet
6.1.14  KDMichigan  replied to  Vic Eldred @6.1.13    8 years ago

I tried to post his letter.

His letter sounds more convincing than Christine Fords with all her vague recollections. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
6.1.15  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  KDMichigan @6.1.14    8 years ago

I heard he declared it in a signed Affidavit. That would mean one of them is lying, both under the pains of perjury

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Guide
7  Sparty On    8 years ago

Looking for her 15 minutes of fame ....... and for better or worse she found it .....

 
 
 
It Is ME
Masters Participates
8  It Is ME    8 years ago

It was "Mark" Kavanaugh.....ummmmm….. ooooops ……. I mean ……"Brett" Kavanaugh.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
8.1  Ozzwald  replied to  It Is ME @8    8 years ago

It was "Mark" Kavanaugh.....ummmmm….. ooooops ……. I mean ……"Brett" Kavanaugh.

Or Bart O'Kavanaugh?

 
 
 
It Is ME
Masters Participates
8.1.1  It Is ME  replied to  Ozzwald @8.1    8 years ago

[Deleted]

 
 
 
It Is ME
Masters Participates
8.1.3  It Is ME  replied to  Tessylo @8.1.2    8 years ago

removed for context

 
 
 
It Is ME
Masters Participates
8.1.4  It Is ME  replied to  It Is ME @8.1.3    8 years ago

Perfectly Legit Question ! jrSmiley_88_smiley_image.gif

Didn't know the COC now had limits on what was allowed to be asked.

 
 
 
Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו
Junior Quiet
8.1.6  Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו  replied to  Ozzwald @8.1    8 years ago
Or Bart O'Kavanaugh?

That Mark Judge was really clever at hiding the real names of the people in his book, eh?

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
8.1.7  Ozzwald  replied to  Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו @8.1.6    8 years ago

That Mark Judge was really clever at hiding the real names of the people in his book, eh?

I was wondering if anyone would catch that...jrSmiley_81_smiley_image.gif
 
 
 
lady in black
Professor Silent
8.2  lady in black  replied to  It Is ME @8    8 years ago

In a 1983 letter published by  The New York Times  on Tuesday, Supreme Court nominee  Brett Kavanaugh  suggests that he and his friends should warn the neighbors that they are “obnoxious drunks” prior to their “Beach Week” trip. 

The Times, which reviewed a copy of the handwritten note, reported that Kavanaugh acknowledged the letter was his.

 
 
 
It Is ME
Masters Participates
8.2.1  It Is ME  replied to  lady in black @8.2    8 years ago

Obnoxious doesn't a "Sex Offender" be. Do you find that ALL obnoxious folks are sex offenders ?

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
8.2.2  Ozzwald  replied to  It Is ME @8.2.1    8 years ago
Obnoxious doesn't a "Sex Offender" be.
Obnoxious shouldn't a "Supreme Court Justice" be.

 
 
 
It Is ME
Masters Participates
8.2.4  It Is ME  replied to  Tessylo @8.2.3    8 years ago
We believe that this stands for: Find them, French them, Feel them, Finger them, F*ck them, Forget them.'

Since he stated what fffffff meant in front of the Committee....someone else believing something else is meaningless.

Just another he/she/he said.

 
 
 
It Is ME
Masters Participates
8.2.5  It Is ME  replied to  Ozzwald @8.2.2    8 years ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
Colour Me Free
Senior Silent
8.2.6  Colour Me Free  replied to  It Is ME @8.2.4    8 years ago

It is also in the letter ...

When he drank, Mr. Garrett would stutter words that began with the letter F. It became such a joke that many football teammates, including Judge Kavanaugh and Mr. Garrett himself, had “FFFFF” references in their personal yearbook pages.

Yet, apparently conjecture is the new truth for some...?

 
 
 
It Is ME
Masters Participates
8.2.7  It Is ME  replied to  Colour Me Free @8.2.6    8 years ago
Yet, apparently conjecture is the new truth for some...?

Well, Liebral Conjecture started during the presidential election cycle. Apparently the Liberal types want to carry it over to this.

THEY LOST THEN ! History Repeats ?  jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו
Junior Quiet
8.2.9  Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו  replied to  It Is ME @8.2.1    8 years ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
It Is ME
Masters Participates
8.2.10  It Is ME  replied to  Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו @8.2.9    8 years ago

removed for context

 
 
 
Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו
Junior Quiet
8.2.11  Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו  replied to  It Is ME @8.2.10    8 years ago

removed for context

 
 
 
livefreeordie
Junior Silent
8.2.12  livefreeordie  replied to  It Is ME @8.2.10    8 years ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
8.2.13  Ozzwald  replied to  livefreeordie @8.2.12    8 years ago

Removed for context

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
8.2.14  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Ozzwald @8.2.2    8 years ago

And how many justices would we have if we judged them by their words in high school

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
8.2.15  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Tessylo @8.2.3    8 years ago
'Brett Kavanaugh must also be asked about this entry in his yearbook: "FFFFFFFourth of July."

He was asked. Didn't you watch the hearings. I'm sure you can find it 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
8.2.17  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Tessylo @8.2.16    8 years ago
 Yeah, right.

Can you explain what any of that has to do with an allegation of sexual assault?

 
 
 
Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו
Junior Quiet
8.2.20  Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו  replied to  Texan1211 @8.2.8    8 years ago

Why always at 11 on the hysteria meter, Tex?

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
8.2.22  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Texan1211 @8.2.18    8 years ago
This was NEVER about some alleged assault.

Apparently not.  The testimony of 3 women is coming down like a house of cards with at least two of them in legal jeopardy of perjury

 
 
 
Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו
Junior Quiet
10  Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו    8 years ago

Then there is her former boyfriend Richard Vinneccy, who has publicly stated that Ms Swetnick never mentioned anything about being raped to him in all the time he knew her.

Yeah, because there's nothing that women are more eager to tell their boyfriends (or even husbands) than when they were raped or molested.  My wife just got around to telling me about her ballet teacher pinning her against a wall when she was thirteen after more than 30 years of marriage.  What a consummate ASSHOLE Richard Fucking Vinneccy is.  No wonder that relationship didn't go anywhere.  

 
 

Who is online






63 visitors