╌>

James Alex Fields found guilty of killing Heather Heyer during violent Charlottesville white nationalist rally

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  perrie-halpern  •  8 years ago  •  131 comments

James Alex Fields found guilty of killing Heather Heyer during violent Charlottesville white nationalist rally
Fields faces 20 years to life for the first-degree murder charge, and will be sentenced at a later date.

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



By   Minyvonne Burke and Marianna Sotomayor

James Alex Fields Jr. was found guilty on Friday of killing Heather Heyer when he plowed his car into a group of counterprotesters last year at a "Unite the Right" rally that quickly turned violent in Charlottesville, Virginia.

Fields, 21, was convicted on all counts, including first-degree murder in connection to Heyer's death and five counts of aggravated malicious wounding, three counts of malicious wounding and one hit and run count for injuring dozens of others with his vehicle.

In addition, Fields — who a former teacher said was fascinated by Nazism and Hitler — was charged with 30 federal hate crimes. He's been on trial since November for the murder charge and still faces trial on the additional charges.

After deliberating seven hours, the jury found that Fields deliberately rammed his car into the crowd after the rally, which was organized in part to protest the removal of a statue of Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee.

Present in the courtroom for the verdict were Fields' mother and Susan Bro, Heyer's mother. Fields, wearing glasses and a light blue sweater over a collared shirt, stared straight ahead as the verdicts came in.

He faces 20 years to life in prison for the murder charge. Sentencing is expected to begin Monday, when Bro and eight victims of the attack will provide testimony.

The jury will then deliberate before the judge announces the sentencing.

Bro did not comment to reporters as she left court. Wednesday Bowie, who was injured in the attack, said after the verdict that "I could not be more ecstatic."

"This is the best I’ve been in a year-and-a-half," Bowie said. She suffered a broken pelvis, among other injuries, the Associated Press reported.

During the trial, Fields’ attorney, John Hill, argued that he panicked and was scared when  he drove his Dodge Challenger  into the group in August 2017 after hours of violent fights breaking out in the streets between rally attendees and counterprotesters.

Hill told jurors that Fields "feared for his safety," and at one point was remorseful that people had gotten injured.

Prosecutors, however, argued that Fields was angry that day over the fighting taking place between the two sides. Prosecutor Nina-Alice Antony pointed out that Fields, twice posted on Instagram before the rally an image of a group of people getting struck by a car.

"This case is about his decision to act on that anger," Antony said.

Prosecutors also played surveillance video showing Fields driving his car slowly towards the group, reversing and then speeding into them.

Read more at the seeded content


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
Professor Guide
1  seeder  Perrie Halpern R.A.    8 years ago

Thoughts?

 
 
 
pat wilson
Professor Quiet
1.1  pat wilson  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @1    8 years ago

Ya, it's murder. We knew that.

 
 
 
Studiusbagus
Sophomore Silent
1.2  Studiusbagus  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @1    8 years ago

I can't help but wonder if this guy was actually so desperate to stand out in admiration from his peers that he never thought through the "what if's" before he stepped on the gas.

I really think in the back of his brain that 5 years down the road they would all be in a bar telling the glory story all over again how "Jimmy" plowed in to those those lefties and did you see that guy fly over that roof to get away? Never thinking that Hollywood was 3000 miles away and a 3000 lb car would kill someone. We now know through his jailhouse phone call that he wasn't educated at home, just heard the word "nigger" enough to blindly hate.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.3  devangelical  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @1    8 years ago

meh, the contract on his life is probably a case of ramen in the joint.

 
 
 
Spikegary
Junior Quiet
1.4  Spikegary  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @1    8 years ago

This guy deserves the needle or to ride the lightning.  There is no room for that kind of pre-planned murder or hate for that matter, inthis country.

Put an end to this clown's 15 minutes of fame and let his suffering begin.

 
 
 
lady in black
Professor Silent
2  lady in black    8 years ago

Yes, it was murder....will trump pardon this "fine person"

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
2.1  MrFrost  replied to  lady in black @2    8 years ago
will trump pardon this "fine person"

I doubt it, (seriously), but I doubt there would be many that would be surprised if he did. 

 
 
 
Rmando
Sophomore Silent
2.2  Rmando  replied to  lady in black @2    8 years ago

And of course somebody has to bring up Trump even though he has nothing to do with the story. And for the ten thousandth time: it wasn't guys like this Trump was talking about. He was talking about 66% of the country who support not moving monuments.

 
 
 
lennylynx
Sophomore Silent
2.2.1  lennylynx  replied to  Rmando @2.2    8 years ago

Trump has EVERYTHING to do with one of his 'fine people' murdering Heyer.  He has everything to do with the white supremacist rally taking place at all.  No President Trump; no rally.  It's that simple.

 
 
 
Rmando
Sophomore Silent
2.2.2  Rmando  replied to  lennylynx @2.2.1    8 years ago

"No President Trump; no rally. It's that simple."

I would really like to see what evidence or logic supports that. Confederate monuments were being torn down under cover of night before Trump was ever elected or even nominated. Racial tensions were already sore due to the vilification of police who did nothing wrong under the Obama administration. Trump had nothing to do with this happening except in left wing conspiracy circles.

 
 
 
Cerenkov
Professor Silent
2.2.3  Cerenkov  replied to  Rmando @2.2    8 years ago

Well said. The level of Trump derangement on this subject is frightening. 

 
 
 
Cerenkov
Professor Silent
2.2.4  Cerenkov  replied to  lennylynx @2.2.1    8 years ago

Your comment is a lie.

 
 
 
Cerenkov
Professor Silent
2.2.5  Cerenkov  replied to  Rmando @2.2.2    8 years ago

Wow. The left wants to eliminate even more civil rights than I thought...

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
Professor Guide
2.2.6  seeder  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  Rmando @2.2.2    8 years ago

Ramando,

He was not there to protest the moving of the Confederate monuments. He was there to spread hate. He was there marching the night before, saying the "The Jews will not replace us". "N" will not replace us.

I'm not good with that. Are you?

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
2.2.7  Jack_TX  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @2.2.6    8 years ago
He was not there to protest the moving of the Confederate monuments.

The removal of the monument was the reason for the protest.

He was there to spread hate.

Sure.  It's a key part of his/their ideology.

He was there marching the night before, saying the "The Jews will not replace us". "N" will not replace us.

Which, when you think about it, are both such obviously true statements that one wonders about the need to repeat them.  And yes, the Friday night march was illegal and dispersed by authorities.

I'm not good with that. Are you?

The Constitution is good with it, so I am.  I don't need to agree with somebody's ideology to allow them to express it.   The Constitution demands that of me.  It is Rule 1 of being an American.   

Personally, I believe anybody who supports Bernie Sanders lacks the basic intelligence to go out in public without adult supervision, but the Constitution demands that we allow even those people to speak.

 
 
 
Rmando
Sophomore Silent
2.2.8  Rmando  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @2.2.6    8 years ago

I'm not good with that at all but I'm also not good with Trump being blamed for every antisocial action in the country. To say like some have that Trump encouraged this is absurd.

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
2.2.9  Jack_TX  replied to  Cerenkov @2.2.3    8 years ago
Well said. The level of Trump derangement on this subject is frightening. 

Nonsense.  

Donald Trump is responsible for EVERY murder, rape, robbery, assault, and grammatical error everywhere in the world.

Except split infinitives.  But he has yet to demonstrate any willingess to decisively care about those.

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Quiet
2.2.10  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Cerenkov @2.2.5    8 years ago

Your civil rights end when you intentionally plow a woman down.

 
 
 
Spikegary
Junior Quiet
2.2.11  Spikegary  replied to  Jack_TX @2.2.9    8 years ago

Youi should really add the /sarc tag to these tyes of comments...the TDS sufferers will take you at your word.

 
 
 
Spikegary
Junior Quiet
2.2.12  Spikegary  replied to  Paula Bartholomew @2.2.10    8 years ago
Your civil rights end when you intentionally plow a woman down.

Emotionally, I agree with you, but in reality, prisoners, time and time again, the courts have ruled that they do in fact have civil rights.

Is the guy a dirt bag POS that deserves whatever end he gets?  Hell, yes.

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Quiet
2.2.13  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Cerenkov @2.2.4    8 years ago

You wish.

 
 
 
Willjay9
Freshman Silent
2.2.14  Willjay9  replied to  Rmando @2.2    8 years ago

Umm....Trump didnt say that! He said there was many fine people on both sides AT THE RALLY that happened that FRIDAY! You know the fine people who was carrying tiki torches yelling "Jews will not replace us!" and "Blood and soil!"

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Quiet
2.2.15  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Spikegary @2.2.11    8 years ago

You don't seem to have a problem taking the word of a proven serial liar.

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
2.2.16  Jack_TX  replied to  Spikegary @2.2.11    8 years ago
Youi should really add the /sarc tag to these tyes of comments...the TDS sufferers will take you at your word.

If people are that stupid, they deserve the trauma then inflict upon themselves.

 
 
 
Studiusbagus
Sophomore Silent
2.2.17  Studiusbagus  replied to  Jack_TX @2.2.7    8 years ago
The removal of the monument was the reason for the protest.

No it wasn't it was the Unite the White or Right rally.

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
2.2.18  Jack_TX  replied to  Studiusbagus @2.2.17    8 years ago
No it wasn't it was the Unite the White or Right rally.

Which was organized because they were removing the monument.

 
 
 
Studiusbagus
Sophomore Silent
2.2.19  Studiusbagus  replied to  Jack_TX @2.2.18    8 years ago
Which was organized because they were removing the monument.

Whew! Thanks for clearng that up. I thought it was because we were being replaced by Jews and a shortage of tiki torches.

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
2.2.20  Jack_TX  replied to  Studiusbagus @2.2.19    8 years ago
Whew! Thanks for clearng that up.

Happy to help.  

I thought it was because we were being replaced by Jews and a shortage of tiki torches.

Nope.  Monument removal.  Yet another group of batshit nutjobs protesting democracy in action.

 
 
 
dave-2693993
Junior Silent
3  dave-2693993    8 years ago

Hang him high.

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Quiet
3.1  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  dave-2693993 @3    8 years ago

Unless he ends up on death row, they need to keep him out gen pop where his other ilk will make him a hero for what he did.

 
 
 
Studiusbagus
Sophomore Silent
3.1.1  Studiusbagus  replied to  Paula Bartholomew @3.1    8 years ago
Unless he ends up on death row, they need to keep him out gen pop where his other ilk will make him a hero for what he did.

Quite the opposite actually. The inmates are watching this I guarantee. They will know what prison he will be going to before he gets on the bus.

What they saw was a pasty momma's boy that was a wannabe at best. He'll get picked up by aryan nation but not as a hero. For hero status he's going to have to come out swinging, he won't make it. 

Instead, he'll be a punk, but protected, meaning he won't be killed by non whites or in violation of woman rules. He'll be rented out and with that "available space" he"ll also be a mule

Eventually his life will become routine, hell is coming for him first.

 
 
 
Spikegary
Junior Quiet
3.1.2  Spikegary  replied to  Paula Bartholomew @3.1    8 years ago

Your take on this is incorrect.  He will be hated and loathed by every group in prison, except one - the Nazi types and they will use him for sexual pleasure until one of the other groups kill him.  His life sentence will likely only take up a few months.

 
 
 
Studiusbagus
Sophomore Silent
3.1.4  Studiusbagus  replied to  Tessylo @3.1.3    8 years ago

Yep. 

He'll sit in isolation for a short time and then be introduced to the boys.

Everyone thinks they know about prisons and inmates until they become one or work at one.

I love looking at some of the comments knowing they don't know the first fucking thing...

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
3.1.5  devangelical  replied to  Studiusbagus @3.1.4    8 years ago

24/7 protection in the joint by the neo-nazis and white supremacists will leave a bad taste in his mouth

 
 
 
Studiusbagus
Sophomore Silent
3.1.7  Studiusbagus  replied to  devangelical @3.1.5    8 years ago

And farts with sound will be a distant memory.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
3.1.8  Trout Giggles  replied to  Studiusbagus @3.1.1    8 years ago

He'll be some Aryan Butch's prag

I watch too much "Oz"

 
 
 
Studiusbagus
Sophomore Silent
3.1.9  Studiusbagus  replied to  Trout Giggles @3.1.8    8 years ago

Is that still on? 

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
3.1.10  Trout Giggles  replied to  Studiusbagus @3.1.9    8 years ago

I watch it on Netflix...Amazon Prime...one of those streaming services

 
 
 
Studiusbagus
Sophomore Silent
3.1.11  Studiusbagus  replied to  Release The Kraken @3.1.6    8 years ago

You would not believe the butt tatts I saw...

KISS  >0< THIS

"Cash only"

And many more!

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Expert
3.1.13  Ender  replied to  Studiusbagus @3.1.4    8 years ago

Man, I bet you have some stories.

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Quiet
3.1.14  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Studiusbagus @3.1.1    8 years ago

I hope you are right.

 
 
 
lennylynx
Sophomore Silent
4  lennylynx    8 years ago

What jumps to the forefront of my mind is how sad it is that we have a president who is a consistent apologist for Nazis and white supremacists.  Trump and his enablers have Heather Heyer's blood on their hands, ditto Jamal Khashoggi's

 
 
 
Rmando
Sophomore Silent
4.2  Rmando  replied to  lennylynx @4    8 years ago

I could just as easily say Obama was an apologist for radical Muslims by refusing to specifically condemn them and he has the blood on his hands from the Ft Hood, San Bernardino and Pulse club shootings, as well as his downplaying of Isis.

 
 
 
321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu
Sophomore Participates
4.2.1  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu   replied to  Rmando @4.2    8 years ago
I could just as easily say Obama was an apologist for radical Muslims by refusing to specifically condemn them

And of course somebody has to bring up Obama even though he has nothing to do with the story.

But that seems to be par for the course when trying to defend trump. 

It is easier than learning about trump though so here I'll help make it easier:

A few links leading to the virtues of America’s great 45 th president :     

trump%20cheats &qs=ds&form=QBRE            

trump%20lies %20about&qs=ds&form=QBRE

trump%20threatens &qs=n&form=QBRE&sp=-1&pq=trump%20threatens&sc=8-15&sk=&cvid=4DDE8991FBD24AE3BFF76D503255794C

trump%20insults &qs=n&form=QBRE&sp=-1&pq=trump%20insults&sc=8-13&sk=&cvid=C2D6F37D1B074D3D8DF948A079BCA4DA

trump+intimidates

trump%20manipulates &sc=7-17&sk=&cvid=022650A1464F4889811C45D287C1A775

trump+bankruptcy+history &go=Search&qs=ds&form=QBRE

  Now people can learn how to defend trump and maybe leave Obama out of it. 

LOL  

 

 

 
 
 
Rmando
Sophomore Silent
4.2.2  Rmando  replied to  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu @4.2.1    8 years ago

I notice you didn't say anything when Trump was brought up even though he was not part of the story. And I could bring up a random list of Internet searches about Obama to match the TDS list you posted. 

 
 
 
321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu
Sophomore Participates
4.2.3  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu   replied to  Rmando @4.2.2    8 years ago
I notice you didn't say anything when Trump was brought up even though he was not part of the story. And I could bring up a random list of Internet searches about Obama to match the TDS list you posted. 

I wasn't here when trump was first brought up. I was when Obama was brought up and I have no doubt anyone could bring up the same list with Obama's name, The difference would be if one actually read what is in the list. 

 
 
 
Cerenkov
Professor Silent
4.2.4  Cerenkov  replied to  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu @4.2.1    8 years ago

"And of course somebody has to bring up Obama even though he has nothing to do with the story."

A stupid thing to say when bringing Trump into the story. I suggest introspection. 

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
Professor Guide
4.2.5  seeder  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  Rmando @4.2    8 years ago
I could just as easily say Obama was an apologist for radical Muslims by refusing to specifically condemn them and he has the blood on his hands from the Ft Hood, San Bernardino and Pulse club shootings, as well as his downplaying of Isis.

And I would say you are right. I believe in calling a spade a spade. He should have said '"Islamic extremist" or "Islamic Terrorist" but he didn't. Trump should have said " Neo Nazis" but he didn't. Two wrong don't make a right.

 
 
 
321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu
Sophomore Participates
4.2.6  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu   replied to  Cerenkov @4.2.4    8 years ago
A stupid thing to say when bringing Trump into the story. I suggest introspection.

"And of course somebody has to bring up Trump even though he has nothing to do with the story."

I agree. 

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Quiet
4.2.7  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Rmando @4.2.2    8 years ago

The "The previous guy did it, so it is okay if the new guy does it too." justification excuse is sooooo tired.jrSmiley_90_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Spikegary
Junior Quiet
4.2.8  Spikegary  replied to  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu @4.2.3    8 years ago

And yet, you landed right here, didn't bother to read anything else, but were willing to jump in.

 
 
 
321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu
Sophomore Participates
4.2.9  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu   replied to  Spikegary @4.2.8    8 years ago
And yet, you landed right here, didn't bother to read anything else, but were willing to jump in.

so ?

 
 
 
Spikegary
Junior Quiet
4.2.10  Spikegary  replied to  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu @4.2.9    8 years ago

It's a helluva silly way to involve one's self in a conversation, but hey, if makes you happy, keep up the....well, work.

 
 
 
321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu
Sophomore Participates
4.2.11  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu   replied to  Spikegary @4.2.10    8 years ago
It's a helluva silly way to involve one's self in a conversation,

Once I've read the article and posted my opinion if I choose,I read the comment section and respond if something catches my eye. Silly as It may be that's how I use this site. Reading thru the back and forths laced with innuendos and backhanded insults that constantly basicly go nowhere in a long thread bores me. 

To each their own

 
 
 
Cerenkov
Professor Silent
4.4  Cerenkov  replied to  lennylynx @4    8 years ago

Your comment is false. Trump has denounced white supremacists far more often than Obama.

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
Professor Guide
4.4.1  seeder  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  Cerenkov @4.4    8 years ago

Big C,

Neither did and I am sorry, that is just plain wrong. I said that with Obama, and I feel the same way with Trump. When you are dealing with evil, call it what it is. 

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Quiet
4.4.2  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Cerenkov @4.4    8 years ago

Calling them "fine people" is hardly denouncing them.

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Expert
5  Kavika     8 years ago

Put him away for life. 

 
 
 
PJ
Masters Silent
6  PJ    8 years ago

I just keep thinking how this whole situation may have been avoided altogether had Trump and his base not given a nod and a wink to the White Nationalists faction of their "fine" party.  By placing White Nationalists in the WH like Stephen Miller and Steve Bannon and sneaking the Russians into the oval office the message was amplified like a bullhorn to the racists.  

Thank goodness justice prevailed in spite of Trump and his base.

 
 
 
321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu
Sophomore Participates
6.1  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu   replied to  PJ @6    8 years ago
I just keep thinking how this whole situation may have been avoided altogether had Trump and his base not

I think we will be hearing this kind of statement over and over before its over.

 
 
 
PJ
Masters Silent
6.1.1  PJ  replied to  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu @6.1    8 years ago

Yes, it's important to recognize reality.

 
 
 
321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu
Sophomore Participates
6.1.2  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu   replied to  PJ @6.1.1    8 years ago
Yes, it's important to recognize reality.

LOL... I was just mentioning that to another member. 

I  don't think they get it though. LOL 

They still think GOD sent trump to manipulate us.

 
 
 
Cerenkov
Professor Silent
6.1.3  Cerenkov  replied to  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu @6.1.2    8 years ago

You seem confused. God didn't send Trump; a majority of the electorate did. And we are pleased to have him. How many additional wars would the harridan have started by now?

 
 
 
Galen Marvin Ross
Sophomore Quiet
6.1.4  Galen Marvin Ross  replied to  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu @6.1.2    8 years ago
They still think GOD sent trump to manipulate us.

Maybe, Loki has been known to do things like that.

 
 
 
321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu
Sophomore Participates
6.1.5  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu   replied to  Galen Marvin Ross @6.1.4    8 years ago
They still think GOD sent trump to manipulate us.
Maybe, Loki has been known to do things like that.

LOL.. Somehow I don't think that is the GOD they have in mind. 

 
 
 
Galen Marvin Ross
Sophomore Quiet
6.1.6  Galen Marvin Ross  replied to  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu @6.1.5    8 years ago
LOL.. Somehow I don't think that is the GOD they have in mind.

Yeah, they have Yahweh mixed up with this guy,

384

 
 
 
321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu
Sophomore Participates
6.1.7  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu   replied to  Galen Marvin Ross @6.1.6    8 years ago

Details....

they get ya every time. 

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
6.1.8  Trout Giggles  replied to  Galen Marvin Ross @6.1.6    8 years ago

Who is that guy?

 
 
 
Galen Marvin Ross
Sophomore Quiet
6.1.9  Galen Marvin Ross  replied to  Trout Giggles @6.1.8    8 years ago

Lucifer, before being a bad boy.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
6.1.10  Trout Giggles  replied to  Galen Marvin Ross @6.1.9    8 years ago

Kinda hot, except he looks like he has breasts

 
 
 
Galen Marvin Ross
Sophomore Quiet
6.1.11  Galen Marvin Ross  replied to  Trout Giggles @6.1.10    8 years ago
Kinda hot, except he looks like he has breasts

He was called the most beautiful angel in the Bible, I saw one translation of his name which is "Bringer of Light".

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
6.1.12  Trout Giggles  replied to  Galen Marvin Ross @6.1.11    8 years ago

I've seen that, too

He got a little stuck-up, did he?

 
 
 
Galen Marvin Ross
Sophomore Quiet
6.1.13  Galen Marvin Ross  replied to  Trout Giggles @6.1.12    8 years ago

I wonder if that's the case or, if there was something else involved, I'm thinking of the story of Job.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
6.1.14  Trout Giggles  replied to  Galen Marvin Ross @6.1.13    8 years ago

Are you thinking that the story of Job happened before the fall?

 
 
 
Galen Marvin Ross
Sophomore Quiet
6.1.15  Galen Marvin Ross  replied to  Trout Giggles @6.1.14    8 years ago

No, I know that didn't happen before the fall, I'm thinking that the fall wasn't really a fall. Think of it like this, Yahweh's throne room is more of a courtroom with a defense table and, a prosecution table and, a judges bench, Yahweh sits at the judges bench, since Jesus's was crucified he sits at the defense table as the defense attorney and, Lucifer is at the prosecution table. During Jobs time no one sat at the defense table acting as the lawyer of the defense, it was by mans actions that things were decided for them, in Jobs case Lucifer was able to infer what he thought about Job's love of Yahweh and, get Yahweh to set up the trial for Job, now  there is someone at the defense table who can give accurate testimony about man. Anyway, that's the way I explain things to most folks concerning Lucifer. He's Yahweh's prosecutor.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
6.1.16  Trout Giggles  replied to  Galen Marvin Ross @6.1.15    8 years ago

I love it!

Somebody should make a movie and have a really bad person as the defendant like Stalin or Hitler

 
 
 
Galen Marvin Ross
Sophomore Quiet
6.1.17  Galen Marvin Ross  replied to  Trout Giggles @6.1.16    8 years ago

LOL

 
 
 
Studiusbagus
Sophomore Silent
7  Studiusbagus    8 years ago

Beyond the.politics I think the responsibility of her death should be shared among the organizers and even some to the city.

What was supposed to be a rally was quickly turned in to a free-for-all. Everyone knew or should have known that the ugly base of both sides would participate and plan accordingly.

Spencer was working up to this, now that it's happened they drained the bank accounts and are sitting back smiling that they have instigated this violence as a success. 

Charlottesville is on the hook as not taking an all around precaution. Yes, they put feet on the ground and Feds went undercover. What they didn't do was hold the organizers in a place of responsibilty of security and financial recourse. The city should have forced an insurance bond for a substantial amount and didn't. Spencer disappeared as did the followers that were leaders of these groups. The soldiers went crazy and the leaders left the country.

Trump didn't help with his comments and it became fairly obviou that he knew he would be offending his base if he came down harder in his comments.

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
7.1  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Studiusbagus @7    8 years ago

We don't agree on much, but I do agree with you on this one. 

 
 
 
Rmando
Sophomore Silent
7.2  Rmando  replied to  Studiusbagus @7    8 years ago

I agree with that until the last paragraph. The city govt doesn't get the criticism it deserves for its awful mismanagement.

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
Professor Guide
7.2.1  seeder  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  Rmando @7.2    8 years ago

I don't think that Trump caused this, but I do feel he didn't condemn the actions of these people appropriately and call them what they were, Neo Nazis. 

 
 
 
zuksam
Junior Silent
7.2.2  zuksam  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @7.2.1    8 years ago

I think the fault lies with the Idea that you can allow two opposing demonstrations in the same place on the same day. People have the Right to Free Speech but Municipalities have the right to require Permits and they have to approve the scheduling and locations, meaning they do not have to allow two rallies on the same day or location. Most places won't allow this and that's why the Police have arrested so many Leftists at Permitted Rightwing Rallies, the Left weren't given a Permit to have their Counter Rally but they gather Illegally because they're only there to cause trouble, it's the whole reason for their "Counter" Rally. I'm sure that these Towns would be more than happy to Permit a Leftwing Counter Rally the weekend before or after the Rightwing Rally and we could avoid all the violence and arrests and everyone will have their chance to gather peacefully and speak freely. Most of the people who attended the Unite the Right Rally were not Neo Nazi's but some were and while I don't agree with their Ideology they have the right to believe what they want as long as they don't break the law. There's no doubt the guy who ran those people down is a racist and a murderer and I hope he spends the rest of his life in jail. In the end it was the Left who went there with the intent to cause a melee at what otherwise would likely have been a peaceful Rally and they deserve the blame for that.

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Participates
7.2.3  Thrawn 31  replied to  zuksam @7.2.2    8 years ago

IMO the problem is that we allow people to openly be Nazis. 

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
7.2.4  Jack_TX  replied to  Thrawn 31 @7.2.3    8 years ago
IMO the problem is that we allow people to openly be Nazis. 

Intentional irony?

 
 
 
zuksam
Junior Silent
7.2.6  zuksam  replied to  Thrawn 31 @7.2.3    8 years ago
IMO the problem is that we allow people to openly be Nazis.

Any problem that a few misguided Nazi's might cause us is nothing compared to the problems that would be created by letting You, the Government. or Anyone Else decide what they will allow others to openly be.

 
 
 
Spikegary
Junior Quiet
7.2.7  Spikegary  replied to  Thrawn 31 @7.2.3    8 years ago

Perhaps the problem is we have embraced hate when talking to our fellow humans these days.  Can't really blame it on anyone except each individual that has decided it is acceptable for them.

 
 
 
Cerenkov
Professor Silent
7.3  Cerenkov  replied to  Studiusbagus @7    8 years ago

I think the violent liberal protestors also share the blame. If they hadn't been there...

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
Professor Guide
7.3.1  seeder  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  Cerenkov @7.3    8 years ago
I think the violent liberal protestors also share the blame. If they hadn't been there...

Please show me where the liberals got violent. You must be thinking of some other protest since the only act of violence was on the Neo Nazis. 

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
7.3.2  Jack_TX  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @7.3.1    8 years ago
You must be thinking of some other protest since the only act of violence was on the Neo Nazis. 

That's actually not correct.  There was violence from both sides, people from both sides were armed.

Believe it or not, the Nazi's actually had a permit.  

On a broader scale, there is an alarming and dangerous view that has emerged among young liberals that their right to free speech includes the right to deny the free speech of others.  What they call "counter-protesting" bears a remarkable resemblance to traditional thuggish suppression of freedom carried out by totalitarian dictatorships for centuries.

 
 
 
zuksam
Junior Silent
7.3.3  zuksam  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @7.3.1    8 years ago
Please show me where the liberals got violent.

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Participates
7.3.4  Thrawn 31  replied to  Cerenkov @7.3    8 years ago

Kinda like how if those people hadn't been at that show in Vegas... they are certainly partly to blame!

And for the record I absolutely condone violence towards Nazis. 

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
7.3.5  Jack_TX  replied to  Thrawn 31 @7.3.4    8 years ago
Kinda like how if those people hadn't been at that show in Vegas... they are certainly partly to blame!

Did those people go to the show with the intent to commit violence?  

And for the record I absolutely condone violence towards Nazis. 

Then what separates you from them, other than the particular flavor of nutjob ideology? 

 
 
 
lady in black
Professor Silent
7.3.6  lady in black  replied to  Cerenkov @7.3    8 years ago

They have every RIGHT to be there.  

 
 
 
Studiusbagus
Sophomore Silent
7.3.7  Studiusbagus  replied to  zuksam @7.3.3    8 years ago

From your link....

Earlier in the day, Twitter dispatches showed a violent scene with protesters wielding shields, sticks and flags in massive scuffles that left people bloodied. The rally was planned for noon, but police issued an order to disperse before it started. There were also reports of urine being tossed at reporters and the air was said to be filled with pepper spray, mace and tear gas.

Do you understand the difference between "protester" and " counter-protester" ?

The article was describing those you are defending.

 
 
 
zuksam
Junior Silent
7.3.8  zuksam  replied to  Studiusbagus @7.3.7    8 years ago
There were also reports of urine being tossed at reporters and the air was said to be filled with pepper spray, mace and tear gas.

It says right in the article that it was Antifa throwing the piss fill balloons and the mace and tear gas. As far as fighting and who the aggressors were there were reports of aggression from both sides during the Riot. The facts are that only one group went there with the intent to break up another group's rally, the Rightwingers were there to have a Rally. They didn't go there because the Left was there, it was the Leftists who decided to go there to breakup the Rally and start a fight and it was the Leftists who threw piss on the Media to get rid of them so there'd be no film of their actions. It was the Left who went there with Criminal Intent, they went there to Violently Riot and breakup a legitimate Political Rally. It was their intent. they were not there to have a counter rally or to protest, their intent was to incite a riot and that's what they did and for that the blame lands squarely on them.

 
 
 
Studiusbagus
Sophomore Silent
7.3.9  Studiusbagus  replied to  zuksam @7.3.8    8 years ago
It says right in the article that it was Antifa throwing the piss fill balloons and the mace and tear gas. As far as fighting and who the aggressors were there were reports of aggression from both sides during the Riot.

Then you should have no problem showing us where it say Antifa was doing this or about the aggressors.

and the air was said to be filled with pepper spray, mace and tear gas.

Really? Police there with tear gas and pepper spray but it was Antifa? It said it was in the air...

Show your proof please?

 
 
 
Studiusbagus
Sophomore Silent
7.3.10  Studiusbagus  replied to  zuksam @7.3.8    8 years ago
and it was the Leftists who threw piss on the Media to get rid of them so there'd be no film of their actions. It was the Left who went there with Criminal Intent, they went there to Violently Riot and breakup a legitimate Political Rally. It was their intent. they were not there to have a counter rally or to protest, their intent was to incite a riot and that's what they did and for that the blame 

Got any facts to back that up or is this just your imagination you're trying to pass off as fact?

 
 
 
Studiusbagus
Sophomore Silent
7.3.11  Studiusbagus  replied to  zuksam @7.3.8    8 years ago

Where'd you go? 

You made these claims and can't back them up with fact?

Disappearing is your answer?

 
 
 
epistte
Junior Participates
7.3.12  epistte  replied to  Jack_TX @7.3.5    8 years ago
Did those people go to the show with the intent to commit violence? 

No, they did not.  The vast majority of the counter-protesters didn't go to Charlotesville to get violent. They went there as a show of mass support to oppose the Alt-Right.

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
7.3.13  Jack_TX  replied to  epistte @7.3.12    8 years ago
The vast majority of the counter-protesters didn't go to Charlotesville to get violent.

Hence the non-violent clubs and pepper spray they brought with them.

They went there as a show of mass support to oppose the Alt-Right.

They went there to disrupt the Nazi rally.  They went there to deny those with whom they disagree the same constitutional rights they themselves demand.  

What they don't like to hear is that no matter how vile Nazi ideology may be, those who hold it have a right to express it.  To attempt to deny them that right is to become as vile as they are.

 
 
 
epistte
Junior Participates
7.3.14  epistte  replied to  Jack_TX @7.3.13    8 years ago
Hence the non-violent clubs and pepper spray they brought with them.

They were there to defend themselves if the Alt-right chose to attack.  Do you want to deny that this happened?

Four members of a militant white supremacist group from California have been arrested on charges they traveled to Virginia last year to incite a riot and attack counterprotesters at a white nationalist rally that turned deadly , federal authorities said Tuesday. The defendants — Benjamin Drake Daley, Michael Paul Miselis, Thomas Walter Gillen and Cole Evan White — are part of the Rise Above Movement, which espouses anti-Semitic views and meets regularly in public parks to train in boxing and other fighting techniques, according to an affidavit written by an FBI agent.

.

They went there to disrupt the Nazi rally.  They went there to deny those with whom they disagree the same constitutional rights they themselves demand.  

The past has shown that ignoring the Nazis and the Klan is an tacit endorsement of their ideas. Show up and outnumber them is the best way to oppose their violet ideology. I'm sure they would rather have it be peaceful but it doesn't always work that way. I have a small canister of pepper spray/CS in my purse so am I looking for trouble because of it?

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
7.3.15  Jack_TX  replied to  epistte @7.3.14    8 years ago
They were there to defend themselves if the Alt-right chose to attack.

No they weren't.  If you're concerned about being attacked, you take a cop.  Or better yet, you go have lunch in a different location.

  Do you want to deny that this happened?

It's very difficult to attack people who don't confront you.  Even for Nazis.  

The past has shown that ignoring the Nazis and the Klan is an tacit endorsement of their ideas.

Nonsense.  In any case, that would not justify denying them their constitutional rights.  Unless of course you're trying to out-Nazi the Nazis.

Show up and outnumber them is the best way to oppose their violet ideology.

That's utterly stupid.  That's seriously the dumbest thing you've said in months.  Absolutely nothing positive comes out of standing out there in the street and looking exactly as crazy as the people you oppose.  

I'm sure they would rather have it be peaceful

Then they should meet somewhere else for coffee.

but it doesn't always work that way.

As in "almost never" works that way.  The thing about violent bigots is....they're "violent".  They want to fight.  They're hoping you show up so they can kick your ass.  They're hoping you try to interfere with their constitutional right to assemble so they'll have justification for kicking your ass.

Normal, regular people....who have lives and thus don't go to protests....look at protesters and counterprotesters as almost indistinguishable flavors of batshit.

I have a small canister of pepper spray/CS in my purse so am I looking for trouble because of it?

If you take it with you to go shout at people in the street, absolutely.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
7.3.16  Trout Giggles  replied to  Jack_TX @7.3.15    8 years ago
Normal, regular people....who have lives and thus don't go to protests....look at protesters and counterprotesters as almost indistinguishable flavors of batshit.

You know what, Jack? The highlighted portion of your comment is exactly how we should deal with all these crazy alt-right, alt-left loony toons.

Let them have their little rallies, while we work our jobs, take care of our families, and live our lives in peace. When nobody confronts the loonies they look ridiculous with their little hate filled signs and hot air blowing from their pie-holes.

The best way to counteract the loonies is by peacefully showing up at the voting polls

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
7.3.17  Jack_TX  replied to  Trout Giggles @7.3.16    8 years ago
You know what, Jack? The highlighted portion of your comment is exactly how we should deal with all these crazy alt-right, alt-left loony toons.

Yes ma'am.

Let them have their little rallies, while we work our jobs, take care of our families, and live our lives in peace. When nobody confronts the loonies they look ridiculous with their little hate filled signs and hot air blowing from their pie-holes.

100% accurate.  Responding to them legitimizes them.  Further, it legitimizes the entire concept of failing to control one's emotions.

 
 
 
sandy-2021492
Professor Guide
8  sandy-2021492    8 years ago

I hope the sentence fits the crimes.  He should never get out.

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
Professor Guide
8.1  seeder  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  sandy-2021492 @8    8 years ago

Agreed.

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Participates
11  Thrawn 31    8 years ago

Good, fuck him.

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
12  Bob Nelson    8 years ago

R. I. P. original

She was one of the many thousands of victims of deadly White-Supremacist violence in America.

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Expert
13  Ender    8 years ago

If one feared for his life, he would go in the opposite direction, not directly at them.

I am sure no one is surprised by the verdict. Although I did think he would get a longer sentence.

For me, it just shows what weak minded people hyped up on hate are capable of.

 
 
 
sandy-2021492
Professor Guide
13.1  sandy-2021492  replied to  Ender @13    8 years ago

I don't think he's been sentenced yet.

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
13.1.1  Split Personality  replied to  sandy-2021492 @13.1    8 years ago

Sentencing is scheduled for Monday

 
 
 
sandy-2021492
Professor Guide
13.1.2  sandy-2021492  replied to  Split Personality @13.1.1    8 years ago

20 to life for the murder charge, and then there are charges for malicious wounding.  Even if he doesn't get life for murder, if the sentences are served consecutively rather than concurrently, he could be there for a long time.

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Expert
13.1.3  Ender  replied to  sandy-2021492 @13.1    8 years ago

At first I saw up to twenty years. I thought that was low. I didn't see the twenty to life. My bad.

 
 
 
Studiusbagus
Sophomore Silent
13.1.4  Studiusbagus  replied to  sandy-2021492 @13.1.2    8 years ago
the sentences are served consecutively rather than concurrently, he could be there for a long time.

And the juciest best part of what you suggest...if he starts appealing he has to appeal each aentence one at a time.

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Quiet
13.1.5  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  sandy-2021492 @13.1.2    8 years ago

Do you know if a hate crime enhancement had any impact on the sentence?

 
 
 
sandy-2021492
Professor Guide
13.1.6  sandy-2021492  replied to  Paula Bartholomew @13.1.5    8 years ago

According to NPR, no.

The life sentence was in response to Fields' first-degree murder conviction . The jury arrived at 419 additional years, The Associated Press reports, by recommending "70 years for each of five malicious wounding charges, 20 for each of three malicious wounding charges, and nine years on one charge of leaving the scene of an accident."

He has yet to face charges for hate crimes.

 
 
 
Studiusbagus
Sophomore Silent
14  Studiusbagus    8 years ago

Hahaha!

Life plus about 5 more life sentences worth.

And he has to appeal the added time before he can appeal the life sentence.

And he hasn't even been to trial for hate crimes yet.

 
 
 
epistte
Junior Participates
14.1  epistte  replied to  Studiusbagus @14    8 years ago
And he hasn't even been to trial for hate crimes yet.

The hate crimes won't ever see a courtroom unless his lawyers file an appeal.  Why would the state spend the money on a trial when he already has multiple life sentences hanging over him?  This kid will never see the light of day again. 

 
 
 
Studiusbagus
Sophomore Silent
14.1.1  Studiusbagus  replied to  epistte @14.1    8 years ago
Why would the state spend the money on a trial when he already has multiple life sentences hanging over him? 

States will try him for that for two reasons. 

Makes it harder for him to appeal anything because of the cloud of a hate crime and adds one more convictionamong the timed convictions to appeal the life sentence.

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
15  Split Personality    8 years ago
The jurors were instructed that the sentences would be “presumed to be consecutive” unless they recommended that the terms be served simultaneously. The panel made no such recommendation. Fields’s overall sentence: life plus 419 years and $480,000 in fines.

The same jury of seven women and five men convicted Fields of those 10 offenses Friday in Charlottesville Circuit Court. In Virginia, trial juries determine what penalties should be meted out within sentencing ranges dictated by law.

Judge Richard E. Moore, who said he will formally sentence Fields on March 29,

can impose a lesser punishment than the jurors called for but is not allowed to increase the sentences.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/james-a-fields-jr-sentenced-to-life-in-prison-in-charlottesville-car-attack/2018/12/11/8b205a90-fcc8-11e8-ad40-cdfd0e0dd65a_story.html?utm_term=.d75986267ce3
 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
16  Hal A. Lujah    8 years ago

I grew up in Maumee, Ohio, the same town this douchebag is from.  It was a quintessential small town, where nothing of this kind ever happened.  Since I have moved away from this area of Ohio, Maumee has really gone down hill.  A good friend of my daughters was murdered by a guy from Maumee, who shot her while the two of them were driving separate cars.  Another acquaintance from my youth in Maumee was knifed to death shortly after that.  Then I saw yesterday that two people from the area were arrested for planning terrorist attacks, one of them being a girl who graduated from Maumee high school.  She sounds dangerous as fuck.  It's a good thing the authorities are on top of this shit.  Too bad they didn't have an opportunity to nab this asshole before he killed someone.

http://www.wtol.com/2018/12/10/toledo-woman-charged-with-domestic-terror-plots-buying-bomb-making-materials/ 

https://abc6onyourside.com/news/local/fbi-announcing-arrest-involving-national-security-in-ohio-monday-morning 

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
17  Bob Nelson    8 years ago

The sentencing of a White Supremacist murderer does nothing to diminish the attacks by White-supremacist / neo-Nazi shills on antifa, who have never killed anyone.

 
 

Who is online







102 visitors