╌>

Breaking: Nicholas Sandmann Sues WaPo For $250 Million

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  badfish-hd-h-u  •  7 years ago  •  89 comments

Breaking: Nicholas Sandmann Sues WaPo For $250 Million

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



Rush to control the narrative.


(Reuters)   – A high school student from Covington, Kentucky, at the center of a videotaped incident at the Lincoln Memorial involving a Native American activist sued the Washington Post for defamation on Tuesday, claiming the newspaper “vilified” him because he is white.

The lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court in Kentucky by Covington Catholic High School student Nicholas Sandmann, 16, seeks $250 million in damages – saying that was the amount Jeff Bezos, founder of Amazon.com and the world’s richest person, paid for the Post in 2013.

“The Post wrongfully targeted and bullied Nicholas because he was the white, Catholic student wearing a red ‘Make America Great Again’ souvenir cap on a school field trip to the Jan. 18 March for Life in Washington, D.C.,” the lawsuit claims.

Sandmann “was unexpectedly and suddenly confronted by Nathan Phillips … a known Native American activist, who beat a drum and sang loudly within inches of his face,” the suit said.

Representatives for the Washington Post did not immediately respond to a request by Reuters for comment.

Keep reading…


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Citizen Kane-473667
Professor Quiet
3  Citizen Kane-473667    7 years ago

Good for him!  Hopefully he wins and it will send a shockwave through the Press to get their facts straight before reporting. Too much "Fake News" going around these days...

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Expert
4  Ender    7 years ago

I don't see how they would have a case. A viral video was reported on. The video was already out there.

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
4.2  Split Personality  replied to  Ender @4    7 years ago

They will also have to prove damage.

To a 16 year old reputation?  His ability to get a job in the future?

Vulgar abuse?

Ask David Hogg about vulgar abuse.  I don't see that kids name on any lawsuits against the mountain of media that defamed him during and after Parkland.

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Expert
4.2.1  Ender  replied to  Split Personality @4.2    7 years ago

It was nasty about Hogg, even down to his college applications.

This kid and his family just want money. It would also be good optics for trump and his supporters.

Paper forced to give cash payout to MAGA teen.

 
 
 
bbl-1
Professor Silent
4.2.2  bbl-1  replied to  Split Personality @4.2    7 years ago

Probably because David Hogg is not a MAGA nut.

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Expert
4.2.3  Ender  replied to  bbl-1 @4.2.2    7 years ago

Hogg was standing up for something. Something horrific he lived through.

They said nasty things and he got death threats.

Yet now we have a teen standing up to a big bad (elderly) Native American.

And the right goes nuts and praises this kid and wants him to get millions of dollars.

Un fucking real.

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
4.2.4  Jack_TX  replied to  Ender @4.2.3    7 years ago
Hogg was standing up for something.

Yes. 

David Hogg.

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Expert
4.2.5  Ender  replied to  Jack_TX @4.2.4    7 years ago

Then what was this kid standing up for, if not himself.

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Expert
4.2.6  Ender  replied to  Jack_TX @4.2.4    7 years ago

The sad thing is people trying to compare what a kid went trough, being shot at and had his peers die, against a kid that thought he was cool puffing his chest out to an indigenous elderly person.

Come back when you all have anything close.

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
4.2.7  Jack_TX  replied to  Ender @4.2.5    7 years ago
Then what was this kid standing up for, if not himself.

David Hogg has turned the tragic deaths of his classmates into national celebrity and a scholarship to Harvard.

Judged on his own merits before the shooting, he was rejected by Cal State Long Beach.  

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
4.2.8  Jack_TX  replied to  Ender @4.2.6    7 years ago
Come back when you all have anything close.

I make no comment about Sandmann, except that the media created a national hysteria about a complete non-event that involved no actual violence whatsoever.

Hogg is riding a mass shooting as a gravy train.  

So no...they're not particularly close.  

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
4.2.11  Jack_TX  replied to    7 years ago
And the going rate for a 'victim card' is now $250 million. Gravy and biscuits.

I think the amount of the suit is actually a very valid point/topic for conversation.

If we were talking about $5 million or $10 million, then OK...that's not an unexpected amount.  It's enough to secure a family's financial future and it's nothing to the business in question.

But $250 million??  That's a whole new ball game. 

Now...none of that changes the fact that David Hogg has self promoted his way to "set for life" on the backs of kids being murdered.  So in terms of the seriousness of the actual events that started their respective journies, there will never be any comparison.

 
 
 
katrix
Sophomore Quiet
4.2.12  katrix  replied to  Jack_TX @4.2.11    7 years ago
But $250 million??  That's a whole new ball game.

The parents said they picked that amount because that's how much Bezos paid for the WaPo.

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
4.2.13  Jack_TX  replied to  katrix @4.2.12    7 years ago
The parents said they picked that amount because that's how much Bezos paid for the WaPo.

I read that.  I'm still not sure I understand that logic, but it's their kid and their call.

Still, I guess my point was that suing for the value of the enterprise is a very different thing than the normal lawsuit for wrongful acts.

 
 
 
KDMichigan
Junior Quiet
4.2.14  KDMichigan  replied to  Ender @4.2.6    7 years ago
against a kid that thought he was cool puffing his chest out to an indigenous elderly person.

And this here is exactly what the lawsuit is about. 

The false story that is still being spewed By people about their son.

Thanks for giving an example.

 
 
 
katrix
Sophomore Quiet
4.2.15  katrix  replied to  Jack_TX @4.2.13    7 years ago

And it was a good point.

 
 
 
bbl-1
Professor Silent
5  bbl-1    7 years ago

Sandmann the MAGA teen.  The definition of 'snot nosed kid' is defined, again.

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
5.1  Ronin2  replied to  bbl-1 @5    7 years ago

Why? Because he doesn't subscribe to your political view point?

 
 
 
Rmando
Sophomore Silent
5.2  Rmando  replied to  bbl-1 @5    7 years ago

Do you consider all victims of hate speech and intimidation to be "snot nose kids"?

 
 
 
bbl-1
Professor Silent
5.2.1  bbl-1  replied to  Rmando @5.2    7 years ago

No.  Only those that meet the qualifications.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
5.2.2  Trout Giggles  replied to  bbl-1 @5.2.1    7 years ago

I called him a future incel in another seed

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
5.2.3  Ronin2  replied to  bbl-1 @5.2.1    7 years ago

Demonizing the victim; and the left claims the right have lost it.

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
5.2.4  Ronin2  replied to  Trout Giggles @5.2.2    7 years ago

The shear amount of hatred for the victim coming from the left is staggering.

All because he had the temerity to wear a MAGA hat.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
5.2.5  Trout Giggles  replied to  Ronin2 @5.2.3    7 years ago

Wait....don't you conservatives say that kids need to learn that life is unfair and harsh? So now you want to protect the little crotch goblins?

Make up your damn minds!

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
5.2.6  Trout Giggles  replied to  Ronin2 @5.2.4    7 years ago

My major problem with this kid is his sense of entitlement.

Entitlement to tell women that their bodies don't belong to them and he has the balls to tell women what they are allowed to do with their bodies.

I see an unplanned pregnancy in his future.....

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
5.2.7  Jack_TX  replied to  Ronin2 @5.2.3    7 years ago
Demonizing the victim; and the left claims the right have lost it.

It does make one stop and pause, doesn't it.

I still have not become accustomed to the ease with which some people disregard their own values simply to support Team Liberal.

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
5.2.8  Jack_TX  replied to  Trout Giggles @5.2.5    7 years ago
Make up your damn minds!

The irony of this statement is off the charts.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
5.2.9  Trout Giggles  replied to  Jack_TX @5.2.7    7 years ago

Just trying to expose conservative hypocrisy.....

And before you say it...I know I'm a hypocrite. How many of you can admit that you're one, also?

 
 
 
KDMichigan
Junior Quiet
5.2.10  KDMichigan  replied to  Trout Giggles @5.2.6    7 years ago
My major problem with this kid is his sense of entitlement.

OMG he has the audacity to have a different opinion than you? And wear a MAGA hat to boot? The horror.

Don't see how this makes him entitled though. 

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
5.2.11  Trout Giggles  replied to  KDMichigan @5.2.10    7 years ago

OMG! OMG! OMG!

I have a different opinion than you!!!!

I should be drawn and quartered!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 

omg....you didn't fucking even read my goddamm comment or fucking comprehend it. 

 
 
 
KDMichigan
Junior Quiet
5.2.12  KDMichigan  replied to  Trout Giggles @5.2.11    7 years ago

[Removed]

 
 
 
cms5
Freshman Silent
8  cms5    7 years ago

Good for Nick! Whether they get 250M or not, this case needs to be heard. MSM cannot be allowed to ruin lives without consequence.

 
 

Who is online


88 visitors