Vanity Fair: Trump Knew Jeffrey Epstein Had Incriminating Photos of Bill Clinton
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
Back in 2015, onstage at the annual CPAC conference, Trump said something very interesting about Bill Clinton. "Nice guy," he said. "Got a lot of problems coming up, in my opinion, with the famous island with Jeffrey Epstein. Lot of problems."
Trump knew what he was talking about. Vanity Fair reports that, shortly before CPAC, Trump was approached by David Pecker, who then owned the National Enquirer . Pecker visited Trump and brought along "an issue with a Prince Andrew and Epstein-related cover." They were joined by Trump lawyer Michael Cohen.
After the meeting, Trump called in Sam Nunberg, who then worked for him. Nunberg told Vanity Fair :
“Michael was sitting in there when I came in, and the issue of the National Enquirer with the pictures of Prince Andrew was on his desk. He said not to tell anyone, but that Pecker had just been there and had brought the issue with him. Trump said that Pecker had told him that the pictures of Clinton that Epstein had from his island were worse ."
What makes Vanity Fair 's report double fascinating is that the leftist magazine clearly implies that Epstein doesn't have any dirt on Trump himself. On Twitter, leftist users have been tweeting hopefully about how this could ruin Trump's presidency. Vanity Fair knows better. When push comes to shove, this case will involve high-ranking and extremely influential Democrats .
Trump isn’t known to have gone on any trips with Epstein, which would have been out of character. “I don’t think Trump would go to someone else’s property or someone else’s island or villa,” Nunberg said. “He doesn’t even play golf at anyone else’s clubs.”
Speaking to reporters on Tuesday, President Trump dismissed his past appearances with Epstein, describing him as a “fixture in Palm Beach” in those years. “I had a falling out with him a long time ago,” he added, though he declined to elaborate. “I don’t think I’ve spoken to him for 15 years.”
As I wrote last Sunday, this case will almost certainly end up destroying several careers and private lives -- and rightfully so. Those involved with Epstein don't deserve any better. They're the lowest of the low.
Tags
Who is online
115 visitors
He must be a Buffett fan.
"15 may get you 20, but that's alright. Cuz they'll be rockin and a rollin on Livingston Saturday night"
- Jimmy Buffett, Livingston Saturday Night
It is my job to apply common sense to articles such as this one.
First of all, there is no evidence that such photos of Clinton with the Epstein girls exists. The "allegation" is that Epstein told Pecker , who then told Trump, that such photos existed. Passing such a story through the mouths of three known scumbags doesnt necessarily inspire a lot of confidence.
Second, unlike others such as Prince Andrew and Alan Dershowitz and Epstein himself, there are no allegations from the girls Epstein used that any of them had sex with Bill Clinton. Don't you think that if it was true one or more of them would have said something by now?
Third , if Trump knew of evidence that Clinton had sex with underage girls in 2015, he would have used it in the 2016 election campaign.
Stop using logic and reasoning ,
it might ruin some good juicy conspiracy theories, as if there weren't enough about the Clintons'
While I chuckle at your first sentence, have to agree with the rest of it for the most part. WE have no evidence any such photo's exist of anybody with the Epstein girls. Just like the 2 years of the Meuller investigation, I am willing to wait for proof to come out into the public domain.
Please read what I wrote. I'm not comparing this to the Mueller investigation, but just like the 2 years where that investigation was running I am willing to wait for proof of this to come out. At this point we have very little proof of anything and as normal main-stream media as well as the rumor mill is running hard on a story with little detail and a lot of conjecture.
Don't you think that if it was true one or more of them would have said something by noW?
right, that’s the argument you made to discredit Ford since she didn’t tell anyone for almost 30 years about kavanaughs alleged assault..
Because you are consistent on this.....
Oh, and if pecker confirms that Epstein told him that Epstein had pictures of Clinton molesting girls, that is admissible evidence in court.
Pecker is a liar and a criminal who acknowledged killing stories that were harmful to Trump. I dont think it would be particularly hard to invalidate him as witness.
Actually, NO, no it isn't.
There's this thing called 'hearsay'.
There would be NO reason to allow Pecker's hearsay testimony about what Epstein said because Epstein is now quite 'available' to testify in his own words. I'm pretty sure that right now, the LAST thing that Epstein's lawyers want to think about is putting Epstein on the stand under ANY circumstances.
There's this thing called a statement against interest. Look it up.
There is this thing called witness immunity. Look it up.
Why would Pecker get witness immunity?
You said pecker. (Giggles while channeling Jake from 2 1/2 Men)
I was talking about Epstein.
How would Pecker be making a statement against interest, are you positing that he was there too?
Pecker would be the one testifying. The statement against interest was made by Epstein.
I've already explained that hearsay isn't allowed.
Nope Epstein allegedly made a statement against Clinton. Do try to keep up.
I've already explained that hearsay isn't allowed.
I've already explained the exception to that rule. Look Again!
Epstein allegedly made a statement against Clinton. Do try to keep up
Oh, you think it's okay to keep pictures of underage women being sexually assaulted. That explains it.
HOW would that statement by Pecker be a statement against his interest UNLESS Pecker was a co-conspirator or a participant? Please be specific.
Oh wait, maybe it's your posit that it's against his interest because Pecker can't publish the pictures himself and profit from it?
STRAW MAN FALLACY!
Total and utter fail.
Once again you've proven to be an utterly incapable of addressing my actual comments and instead need to attack my character.
Well done Sean.
Oh and BTFW, the appropriate word for 'underaged women' is girls/children.
Thanks for pointing out the utter lack of credibility of the seed.
Of course, credibility isn't a standard that matters, as proven by the ongoing seeds that are baseless and are seemingly being posted merely as provocation for snarks sake...
And yet here you are giving the seed traffic.
Oh is that the new standard now KD? Is it your posit that seeds that lack credibility should be left unchallenged?
What did you challenge.
Come on Dulay you must have something from all that vast knowledge you gained spending a couple hours in grandpa's vegetable garden?
Is that a question?
Perhaps you can point out where I said I challenged anything?
Non-responsive deflection.
Please proceed.
We all know how the hillbilly mafia Clintons take care of loose ends. I'm sure they never made it off Pervy island after slick Willy had his way with them during his two dozen plus trips.
We all know = wackadoodle conspiracy buffs
Cough, cough, cough - "It is YOUR job"????
We all know Bill is a hound dog. If he is guilty, bring on charges. The only thing I don't get is the SS would be following him. They would know what has happened over the years.
I was of the thought that Epstein would start throwing out names, now I am not so sure with his bevy of high priced lawyers.
But we already know about Bill Clinton and young women. Look at the photo of him at the top of the page - Oh, wait a sec, that's his daughter.
Cheap shot Buzz. FSB boy?
That was obviously meant as a joke - guess you have trouble with them when it has to do with your heroes. By the way, I'm lost when it comes to acronyms - maybe because I rarely text-message. FSB?
Tired of jokes. Crooked Hillary, Birtherism and everybody is a crook except me is wearying.
Heroes? That too is an unnecessary shot. Stop it. If you have something, bring it.
Oh yeah. About FSB boy. In Vietnam we had a saying meant only for those that already knew. "If you don't know you can't ask."
IDGAS
[Deleted]
Vanity Fair's article is based on allegations from Pecker. Vanity Fair did not see 'the photos.' Neither has anyone else. Perhaps Pecker should testify under oath concerning this, either in public or a Grand Jury. Accusations of this magnitude must be fully vetted, investigated and prosecuted if merited.
Epstein's island? Trump knows about that? Wonder what else Trump knows?