╌>

Unsealed docs show Planned Parenthood charged $25G for body parts, blood samples within months

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  heartland-american  •  6 years ago  •  71 comments

By:   Sam Dorman

Unsealed docs show Planned Parenthood charged $25G for body parts, blood samples within months
"Planned Parenthood and StemExpress's business relationship -- sadly not unique to them -- sets quotas for certain types of abortions, treats pregnant women like a cash crop, places a price tag on human beings, and declares that our nation's children are worth more dead than alive," he said. His comments echoed those of former Planned Parenthood director Abby Johnson, who said her clinic in Texas had quotas and sought to "turn every client interaction into a revenue-generating visit."

Planned Parenthood needs to be shutdown forever for engaging in abortion for the purposes selling the dead baby’s parts for profit.  It is clear that those exposing PP were correct in their statements on the issue.  Planned Parenthood’s vile scheme to blame their accusers has been completely exposed.  


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



Recently-unsealed documents reveal  Planned Parenthood charged a biospecimen company nearly $25,000 for fetal tissue and maternal blood samples in 2012, fueling accusations from opponents that the nation's largest abortion provider violated federal law while exchanging fetal body parts.

The invoices were unsealed as part of Planned Parenthood's lawsuit with David Daleiden, the pro-life journalist whose undercover videos prompted both state and federal calls for investigations. According to the invoices, Planned Parenthood Mar Monte charged StemExpress $55.00 per "POC," or products of conception -- another term for fetal remains -- and $10.00 per sample of blood.

Three invoices -- dated Aug. 2, Sept. 5, and Sept. 28 -- show the abortion provider charging $5,860, $11,365, and $7,715. That totals $24,940, along with more than 200 POC's.

Daleiden argues that the disclosure reveals Planned Parenthood clearly violated federal law, which only allows reimbursements for associated costs rather than for the body part itself.

Planned Parenthood has defended itself by claiming that its charges related to transportation and time spent by staff. The invoices don't mention either of those, however, nor do they contain the word "reimbursement."

Instead, they assign a fee per body part. Specifically, the previously released contract between those organizations showed that the exchanges were based on "POC determined in the clinic to be usable."

Planned Parenthood did not provide specific comment, but pointed Fox News to a more generic backgrounder on Daleiden. "Planned Parenthood has never, and would never sell fetal tissue, and any claim otherwise is absurd," the document reads . It previously announced that it wouldn't accept payments for its fetal tissue program, with its president arguing that doing so should put to rest concerns about Planned Parenthood having "any financial interest in fetal donation."

StemExpress, which promises "financial profits" in its brochure , handled all of the services for which Planned Parenthood might legitimately seek reimbursement under the law, Daleiden argued. He pointed to a House Select Panel report suggesting that Planned Parenthood was engaging in "double counting" costs like transportation. Instead, it indicated that the group's costs were "more properly assigned to the middleman procurer or the end user researcher."

On Wednesday, Daleiden told Fox News: "The federal law against selling aborted fetal organs and tissues in exchange for 'valuable consideration' was enacted to prevent monetary incentives to turn children in the womb into a commodity. The law lays out the unmistakable difference between a researcher reimbursing a clinic for used up PPE, versus StemExpress paying solely for the number of 'usable' body parts it could collect and then sell from Planned Parenthood's abortions.

"Planned Parenthood and StemExpress's business relationship -- sadly not unique to them -- sets quotas for certain types of abortions, treats pregnant women like a cash crop, places a price tag on human beings, and declares that our nation's children are worth more dead than alive," he said.

His comments echoed those of former Planned Parenthood director Abby Johnson, who said her clinic in Texas had quotas and sought to "turn every client interaction into a revenue-generating visit."

"This is literally what I have been saying for years," Johnson said, responding to the invoices. "They are charging. They have just been line item-ing it under different wording...transport, handling, processing, etc...when the process for handling the POC after an abortion isn't any different.

"You either throw it in a biohazard bag that stays in the clinic or a styrofoam container that goes to the procurement company," she added.

StemExpress did not respond to Fox News' request for comment. The company's contract with Planned Parenthood  specifed  that POC's include "any fetal organ or other fetal or placental material taken from the human uterus during an abortion." It also outlines "reasonable costs" for things like the removal of fetal organs, disposal services, and "appropriate space for in which Stem-Ex representatives and employees may work."

According to Daleiden, those payments violate federal law because they're tied to the usability of extracted body parts rather than merely serving as "associated" costs for handling organs. An email between BioMax, the fake company used by Daleiden, and StemExpress similarly  shows StemExpress emphasizing the need for "only viable" fetal liver specimens.

The Justice Department has opened an investigation into the organization, although it's unclear how it's proceeded since 2017 when it first made headlines. The Justice Department did not immediately respond to Fox News' request for comment.

Planned Parenthood has repeatedly tried to discredit Daleiden as a fraudster who deceptively edited his undercover videos of employees discussing fetal body parts.

"David Daleiden and the Center for Medical Progress intentionally waged a multi-year illegal effort to manufacture a malicious campaign against Planned Parenthood," the group said last year.

One of its officials added : “This group’s false claims completely fell apart upon closer investigation, and they’ve been exposed as part of an extreme political agenda to outlaw abortion in this country."

Fusion GPS, the controversial D.C. firm involved in the notorious "Steele dossier" during the Trump-Russia probe, reviewed the videos and claimed  they did not "present a complete or accurate record of the events they purport to depict." Last year, an appeals court contradicted Planned Parenthood's narrative, arguing the videos were "not deceptively edited."

A judge awarded Planned Parenthood $2 million in November as part of a civil lawsuit with Daleiden. He's currently facing criminal charges in a prosecution initiated by Sen. Kamala Harris, D-Calif., when she served as California's attorney general. More specifically, the state is charging him under an anti-eavesdropping law. Five of those charges were dropped by a judge who ruled that "there is an absence of probable cause to establish that these conversations were 'confidential communications' as defined by the statute."


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Gordy327
Professor Participates
2  Gordy327    6 years ago

Not this nonsense again? PP has already been investigated and cleared of any legal violations regarding the "sale" of fetal parts, going on years now. Besides, who cares if PP sells something that would otherwise be disposed of? Donating or selling fetal tissue can be beneficial to medical science and research. 

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
2.2  Split Personality  replied to  Gordy327 @2    6 years ago

As long as any group of people insist that they were made in the image of a god, thus making their existence and lives somehow more important than any other life form on earth, there will be protests over abortion and everything related to it.

you can count on it as surely as you can count on tomorrow's sunrise.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.2.1  devangelical  replied to  Split Personality @2.2    6 years ago

this is why certain religious people should be barred from access to any medical technology that results from research science they disagree with.

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Expert
2.2.2  Ender  replied to  devangelical @2.2.1    6 years ago

Made me think, I wonder what some of these people think of the Christian scientists that deny their children medical attention.

By God all fetusi have to be taken to term yet then they have the right to deny those kids medical care and let them die.

I don't even know if I could call than irony.

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
2.2.3  Split Personality  replied to  devangelical @2.2.1    6 years ago

But if they needed a transplant.....

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
2.2.4  Split Personality  replied to  Ender @2.2.2    6 years ago
I wonder what some of these people think of the Christian scientists that deny their children medical attention.

I worked with a few, one lost an eye, another had his face ripped open in an accident and refused treatment

one lost a child to appendicitis.  Truly sad.

Another couple I hired in SC, were firm believers until their kid was sick - then they hightailed it to the ER.

Made me think Catholicism wasn't too insane.

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Expert
2.2.5  Ender  replied to  Split Personality @2.2.4    6 years ago

It really is sad. Things that are easily curable. These kids that are already in this world don't get a choice and I don't see these right to life people sticking up for them. Ask a ten year old if he wants to die from something preventable and I am sure the kid would 'choose life'.

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
2.2.6  JBB  replied to  Split Personality @2.2.4    6 years ago

An 18 YO high school classmate died in childbirth tied to a door which had been removed from its hinges while members of her church stood round praying. She was then butchered to deliver a son. He has issues. Lots of emotional issues. Last I heard he was in prison. 

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.2.9  devangelical  replied to  Split Personality @2.2.3    6 years ago
But if they needed a transplant.....

I really have no clue how some of the most mentally defective cults feel about organ donations/transplants. I have it checked on my DL, and if given a choice, I would have checked the except born again bible thumpers box too. who am I to delay the meeting with their savior, my mission in life would be to get them to the front of that line as soon as possible.

 
 
 
Gordy327
Professor Participates
2.2.16  Gordy327  replied to  devangelical @2.2.9    6 years ago

Im.a donor too. Either for harvesting and/or for medical science. I figure med students might have some fun poking around my innards. And if nothing else, grind me up and turn me into canned dog food. Lol

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.2.17  devangelical  replied to  Texan1211 @2.2.10    6 years ago
Why worry if you are going to be dead to whom your organs go to? It isn't your say once you agree to donate and have died.

my preference is made clear. I wouldn't want to interfere with the will of their creator.

 
 
 
Gordy327
Professor Participates
2.2.19  Gordy327  replied to  Texan1211 @2.2.18    6 years ago

Actually, it is his choice. Many states have "directed organ donations," where a donor can specify who may receive their organs after death. The specifics of directed donations is covered under the Uniform Anatomical Gift Act (UAGA) and many states have theit own laws based around UAGA.

 
 
 
Gordy327
Professor Participates
2.2.21  Gordy327  replied to  Texan1211 @2.2.20    6 years ago

I referenced UAGA for you. A donor can stipulate a recipient for organ donation. A donor can also specify which organs can be procured. It even covers donation for medical research. Did you even bother to research my citation for yourself? Or are you just trying to argue?

 
 
 
Gordy327
Professor Participates
2.2.23  Gordy327  replied to  Texan1211 @2.2.22    6 years ago
Yes--specific persons--not "any non-Christians or any non-bible-thumpers. If he had named a specific donor to recieve his organs, then it was rather pointlees and rather fucking STUPID for him to have included his statement of "I have it checked on my DL, and if given a choice, I would have checked the except born again bible thumpers box too".

He can select a person who might be a non-christian to receive his organs. Or he can simply donate to medical science so christians do not get his organs. So yes, he is able to make a choice. Saying it's not his choice is demonstrably false.

Sure did.

Good. 

Keep your MF condescension to yourself--I don't want it.

If that's what you think I'm doing, then don't bother replying. Problem solved.

Don;t try to pull that shit on me. I wasn't even fucking commenting to you until you started this shit.

I responded to your post. Just like you did to me. That's what happens in a public discussion. Don't like it? Tough! The fact that you accuse me of being "condescending," cursing, or don't understand the points made only shows you really are just arguing. Don't get mad at me for your own failings as a debater.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.2.26  devangelical  replied to  Gordy327 @2.2.19    6 years ago

I can only think of one of my organs some bible slapper might be interested in, but somebody would first need to relabel it as coming from a teenage boy after harvesting it.

 
 
 
KDMichigan
Junior Quiet
2.2.27  KDMichigan  replied to  devangelical @2.2.26    6 years ago

Probably the same something you like to talk about a lot, that speaks volumes..

 
 
 
Gordy327
Professor Participates
2.2.28  Gordy327  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.2.24    6 years ago
You can stipulate who gets an organ

That is what I said.

 
 
 
Gordy327
Professor Participates
2.2.29  Gordy327  replied to  Texan1211 @2.2.25    6 years ago
Yes--IF he has specified to whom he want to donate his organs TO. It is quite obvious he has not done any designating or he wouldn't have needed to say what he did.

Then take that up with him.

it is NOT demonstrably false IF he has NOT designated a person, which quite clearly he has NOT. Logic would tell that to you if you chose to apply any of it to his post.

The claim made was that he has no choice as to whom his organs go to. That statement is demonstrably false.

I will answer anytime and any one I choose to. if you don;t like getting called out for your condescension-dripping posts, then stop fucking making them

You're the one whining about it, not me.

I don;t get mad at people for being condescending

The tone of your posts suggests otherwise.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
3  Sean Treacy    6 years ago

Going to be tough to get the  people who still believe the tapes of PP were misleadingly edited by Live action to incriminate PP (no matter what a Court of Appeals says) to deal with reality.   They believe in the inerrancy of  PP press releases.  PP's diehard  supporters are basically allergic to fact and reality and prefer the narrative the billion dollar company feeds them.

 
 
 
Gordy327
Professor Participates
3.2  Gordy327  replied to  Sean Treacy @3    6 years ago
They believe in the inerrancy of  PP press releases.  PP's diehard  supporters are basically allergic to fact and reality and prefer the narrative the billion dollar company feeds them.

The same can be said or pro-lifers/anti-choicers who buy into the allegations against PP too.

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Participates
3.4  Thrawn 31  replied to  Sean Treacy @3    6 years ago

I am not allergic to facts, I just find it very amusing that women you don't know, aborting a fetus you would never even meet is such a problem for you. Honestly, because people like you bitch about it so much, I want to keep it going. 

I mean, aside from the fact that PP does a hell of a lot more than abortions and is infinitely more useful to young mothers than all christian groups combined. 

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Expert
4  Ender    6 years ago

Ok, ok. I admit it. 

I have been secretly buying stem cells and fetal tissue. I scarf it down as fast as I can get it. I also slather it on my face to combat wrinkles.

Oh wait. I didn't say that. Seems my transactions were off the books.

The smoking gun seems to be regular invoices for disposal and the like.

Quick, better inform Barr and the justice department. They seem to be slacking on the job...

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Participates
6  Thrawn 31    6 years ago

Ahhh, so once again planned parenthood is butchering babies and selling their body parts. Guess I need to go make another donation!

 
 
 
Gordy327
Professor Participates
6.1  Gordy327  replied to  Thrawn 31 @6    6 years ago
Ahhh, so once again planned parenthood is butchering babies and selling their body parts.

That's what pro-lifers/anti-choicers would have you believe. 

 
 

Who is online




92 visitors