MSNBC's Mika Brzezinski Calls Out Diehard Trump Supporters: 'How Stupid Can You Be?'

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  jbb  •  one month ago  •  103 comments

By:   Yahoo

MSNBC's Mika Brzezinski Calls Out Diehard Trump Supporters: 'How Stupid Can You Be?'
MSNBC's Mika Brzezinski went off Friday morning, urging supporters of President Donald Trump not to be so "stupid" and Republican lawmakers to "wake up" about the ways she says the president is dangerously impacting the country."There's clear disdain that I have for this president, but look at the facts," the "Morning Joe" co-host said. "Look at how he's worn us down, from his paid-off porn star to Russia lies to racism in Charlottesville, racism across the board, children in cages… I mean...

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



Lindsey Ellefson August 14, 2020

MSNBC's Mika Brzezinski went off Friday morning, urging supporters of President Donald Trump not to be so "stupid" and Republican lawmakers to "wake up" about the ways she says the president is dangerously impacting the country.

"There's clear disdain that I have for this president, but look at the facts," the "Morning Joe" co-host said. "Look at how he's worn us down, from his paid-off porn star to Russia lies to racism in Charlottesville, racism across the board, children in cages… I mean lie after lie after lie. Conspiracy theories. Our country right now is really at a breaking point. If we don't find a way to hold this president accountable with his attempts to undermine the Post Office and also his apparent negligence — perhaps purposeful — on saving the American people's lives in this pandemic. You are pathetic at this point."

She went on, accusing Trump of "choosing not to" keep people alive amid the coronavirus pandemic and accusing his fellow GOP lawmakers of letting it happen.

Brzezinski's anti-Trump remarks lasted the duration of a three-hour show and caught attention online Friday.

"How stupid can you be, at this point, if you follow this president?" she demanded at one point. "I beg you not to be, for your life!"


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
smarty_function_ntUser_is_admin: user_id parameter required
[]
 
JBB
1  seeder  JBB    one month ago

A lot of Americans are asking the same question...

 
 
 
Greg Jones
1.1  Greg Jones  replied to  JBB @1    one month ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
1.1.1  Bob Nelson  replied to  Greg Jones @1.1    one month ago

You have no answers, do you, Greg?

 
 
 
FLYNAVY1
1.1.2  FLYNAVY1  replied to  Bob Nelson @1.1.1    one month ago

Never does.......  Goes so far to ask the same questions time and time again even when they are answered.

Greg is here to waste our time.

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
1.1.3  Bob Nelson  replied to  FLYNAVY1 @1.1.2    one month ago
Greg is here to waste our time.

     jrSmiley_89_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
gooseisgone
1.1.4  gooseisgone  replied to  Bob Nelson @1.1.1    one month ago
You have no answers, do you, Greg?

but look at the facts," the "Morning Joe" co-host said. "Look at how he's worn us down,

paid-off porn star (true)

Russia lies (lie)

racism in Charlottesville(lie)

racism across the board(lie)

children in cages (lie)

80% of what she claims is a lie.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
1.1.5  Trout Giggles  replied to  FLYNAVY1 @1.1.2    one month ago
Greg is here to waste our time.

So let's not indulge him

 
 
 
Sparty On
1.1.6  Sparty On  replied to  gooseisgone @1.1.4    one month ago

Nothing new there.

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
1.1.7  Bob Nelson  replied to  gooseisgone @1.1.4    one month ago
80% of what she claims is a lie.

... but you have no details and no links...

Yay!

 
 
 
gooseisgone
1.1.8  gooseisgone  replied to  Bob Nelson @1.1.7    one month ago
but you have no details and no links...

Russia lies (lie) Have you read this thing called the Mueller Report, the Steele Dossier, Kevin Clinesmith

racism in Charlottesville(lie) https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2019/03/21/trump_didnt_call_neo-nazis_fine_people_heres_proof_139815.html

racism across the board(lie) Stopping people crossing our border illegally is not racist. People want to do harm to our country is not racist.

children in cages (lie) https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/07/10/democrats-tweet-2014-photo-migrant-detention-facility/1695534001/ Well I guess it isn't a lie just done under Obama :0

Ok.........now what do you want to talk about.

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
1.1.9  Bob Nelson  replied to  gooseisgone @1.1.8    one month ago

"None so blind... "

 
 
 
Dulay
1.1.10  Dulay  replied to  gooseisgone @1.1.8    one month ago
Russia lies (lie) Have you read this thing called the Mueller Report, the Steele Dossier, Kevin Clinesmith

Have you ever read about Manafort, Stone, Gates, Papadopoulos and Flynn?

racism in Charlottesville(lie)

Reporter: The neo-Nazis started this. They showed up in Charlottesville to protest --"

Trump : "Excuse me, excuse me. They didn’t put themselves -- and you had some very bad people in that group, but you also had people that were very fine people, on both sides.  

racism across the board(lie) Stopping people crossing our border illegally is not racist. People want to do harm to our country is not racist.

Interesting that you jump to boarder crossings for that one. You should have kept your power dry for the next one.

Trump has exhibited racism enumerable times. 

children in cages (lie) https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/07/10/democrats-tweet-2014-photo-migrant-detention-facility/1695534001/ Well I guess it isn't a lie just done under Obama :0

512

Ok.........now what do YOU want to talk about.

 
 
 
dennis smith
1.1.11  dennis smith  replied to  gooseisgone @1.1.8    one month ago

When facts are provided some on the left deflect away. They will soon have 4 more years to bitch and whine.

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
1.1.12  Bob Nelson  replied to  Dulay @1.1.10    one month ago

Or... there's also this;

US Senate report goes beyond Mueller to lay bare Trump campaign's Russia links

Bipartisan intelligence panel says that Russian who worked on Trump’s 2016 bid was career spy, amid a stunning range of contacts

512 Donald Trump and his then campaign manager, Paul Manafort,
at the Republican national convention in Cleveland in 2016.
Rick Wilking/Reuters

A report by the Senate intelligence committee provides a treasure trove of new details about Donald Trump’s relationship with Moscow, and says that a Russian national who worked closely with Trump’s presidential campaign in 2016 was a career intelligence officer.

The bipartisan report runs to nearly 1,000 pages and goes further than last year’s investigation into Russian election interference by special prosecutor Robert Mueller . It lays out a stunning web of contacts between Trump, his top election aides and Russian government officials, in the months leading up to the 2016 election.

The Senate panel identifies Konstantin Kilimnik as a Russian intelligence officer employed by the GRU, the military intelligence agency behind the 2018 poisoning of the Russian double agent Sergei Skripal. It cites evidence – some of it redacted – linking Kilimnik to the GRU’s hacking and dumping of Democratic party emails .

Kilimnik worked for over a decade in Ukraine with Paul Manafort , Trump’s campaign manager. In 2016 Manafort met with Kilimnik, discussed how Trump might beat Hillary Clinton, and gave the Russian spy internal polling data. The committee said it couldn’t “reliably determine” why Manafort handed over this information, or what exactly Kilimnik did with it.

It describes Manafort’s willingness to pass on confidential material to alleged Moscow agents as a “grave counterintelligence threat”. The report dubs Kilimnik part of “a cadre of individuals ostensibly operating outside of the Russian government but who nonetheless implement Kremlin-directed influence operations”. It adds that key oligarchs including Oleg Deripaska fund these operations, together with the Kremlin.

The investigation found that Kilimnik tweets under the pseudonym Petro Baranenko ( @PBaranenko ). The account regularly propagates Moscow’s line on international issues, such as the conflict in Ukraine and the downing of Malaysian Airlines flight MH17.

The fact that a Republican-controlled Senate panel established a direct connection between the Trump campaign and Russian intelligence makes it harder for Trump and his supporters to allege that the investigation into possible collusion was a “witch-hunt” or “hoax” as the president has repeatedly claimed, in the remaining three months before the election.

The Republican-controlled Senate panel said it was hampered in its search for the truth by the fact that Kilimnik and Manafort kept their communications secret. They used burner phones, encrypted chat services, and frequently changed email accounts. They also messaged via a shared email draft.

The committee is dismissive of the dossier by the ex-MI6 officer Christopher Steele , which alleged that the Kremlin had been cultivating Donald Trump for at least five years, but stops short of offering an opinion on whether the allegations within it are true. That dossier contained an allegation that Russia spied on Trump during a visit to Moscow in November 2013 and filmed him in his private suite at the Ritz-Carlton hotel with two prostitutes. Trump strenuously denies the claim.

However, the Senate report offers the most compelling account yet of what went on inside the hotel. It alleges that a suspected Russian intelligence officer is stationed permanently in the building and presides over a “network” of security cameras, some of them hidden inside guest rooms. The officer’s agency is redacted, but is likely to be the FSB, the spy agency Vladimir Putin headed, in charge of counter-intelligence.

The report says: “The committee found that the Ritz Carlton in Moscow is a high counterintelligence risk environment. The committee assesses that the hotel likely has at least one permanent Russian intelligence officer on staff, government surveillance of guests’ rooms, and the regular presence of a large number of prostitutes, likely with at least the tacit approval of Russian authorities.

It adds: “According to two former employees of the Ritz Carlton in Moscow, in 2013 there was at least one [redacted] officer permanently stationed at the hotel. This non-uniformed officer was believed to be a [redacted] and had access to the hotel’s property management system, guest portfolios and notations, as well as the network of “hundreds” of security cameras at the hotel.

There's lots more here.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
1.1.13  Greg Jones  replied to  Dulay @1.1.10    one month ago

Uh....Trump wasn't president when that pix was taken

FAIL!

 
 
 
Dulay
1.1.14  Dulay  replied to  Greg Jones @1.1.13    one month ago
Uh....Trump wasn't president when that pix was taken FAIL!

Uh, Trump sure as fuck WAS President when that picture was taken. 

512

"Immigrant children at Central Processing Center in McAllen, Tex., on May 23, 2018 (Photo courtesy of U.S. Border Patrol)."

FAIL!

 
 
 
gooseisgone
1.1.15  gooseisgone  replied to  Dulay @1.1.10    one month ago

Yes, did someone get charged with conspiring with Russia that I missed?

Is there some point you are trying to make?

There was no example given, so I went with the most popular lie. Feel free to name some more,

I guess you don't have an answer for Obama putting kids in cages.

 
 
 
gooseisgone
1.1.16  gooseisgone  replied to  Bob Nelson @1.1.12    one month ago

Great article Bob, so where are the convictions of the Trump administration for all the ties to Russia. If this concerns you I am sure you have a problem with Biden and Ukraine and China...right.

 
 
 
Dulay
1.1.17  Dulay  replied to  gooseisgone @1.1.15    one month ago
Yes, did someone get charged with conspiring with Russia that I missed?

Did someone get charged with spying on the Trump campaign that I missed? 

Is there some point you are trying to make?

Yes.

There was no example given, so I went with the most popular lie. Feel free to name some more,

Actually, we both gave examples. 

I guess you don't have an answer for Obama putting kids in cages.

You didn't ask a question. 

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
1.1.18  Bob Nelson  replied to  gooseisgone @1.1.16    one month ago

I'm sorry, gig... I have neither the time nor the desire to bring you up to date on US and world events of the last four years. I highly recommend that you find some reliable sources, and do a lot of catching up.

 
 
 
gooseisgone
1.1.19  gooseisgone  replied to  Bob Nelson @1.1.18    4 weeks ago
I'm sorry, gig... I have neither the time nor the desire to bring you up to date

I understand Bob, when confronted with facts you don't have time. 

 
 
 
gooseisgone
1.1.20  gooseisgone  replied to  Dulay @1.1.17    4 weeks ago

Now we're getting somewhere.

Prove it

Yes

Again, what's your point.

You gave "No" examples, Please please please bring your examples.

I need to ask the questions.....huh. 

 
 
 
Dulay
1.1.21  Dulay  replied to  gooseisgone @1.1.20    4 weeks ago
Now we're getting somewhere.

Judging from you below comment, no. 

Prove it

What? 

Yes

What?

Again, what's your point.

What part of my 1.1.10 post didn't you understand? 

You gave "No" examples, Please please please bring your examples.

Perhaps if you read my 1.1.10 post more slowly you'd recognize them. 

I need to ask the questions.....huh. 

If you're going to insist that I give answers, you'll need to. 

 
 
 
gooseisgone
1.1.22  gooseisgone  replied to  Dulay @1.1.21    4 weeks ago

interesting that you jump to boarder crossings for that one. You should have kept your power dry for the next one.

Trump has exhibited racism enumerable times. 

I just posted what you posted, show me what racist comments your talking about. . 

 
 
 
Dulay
1.1.23  Dulay  replied to  gooseisgone @1.1.22    4 weeks ago
show me what racist comments your talking about. 

Since I didn't say anything about 'racist comments', I can't help you. 

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
1.1.24  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  FLYNAVY1 @1.1.2    4 weeks ago

Is this a private party? Last I knew, it was an open forum...

 
 
 
gooseisgone
1.1.25  gooseisgone  replied to  Dulay @1.1.23    3 weeks ago

1.1.10

Dulay read your own post stop with the stupid shit. Give me an example of “Trump has exhibited racism enumerable times”.

 
 
 
Dulay
1.1.26  Dulay  replied to  gooseisgone @1.1.25    3 weeks ago

Why get pissed at me because you can't constructed a fucking cogent question? 

You're comment proves unworthy of my time answer.

Anyone who hasn't seen or heard Trump's racism either hasn't been paying attention or is lying to themselves.  

 
 
 
MAGA
1.1.27  MAGA  replied to  dennis smith @1.1.11    3 weeks ago

Four more years!  I love that! 

 
 
 
Sparty On
1.1.28  Sparty On  replied to  gooseisgone @1.1.25    3 weeks ago

Never expect an honest answer to a honest question from some folks here.    Expect sophomoric insults, deflections, redirects and the simple spewing of more disingenuous narrative.

[Deleted]

 
 
 
gooseisgone
1.1.29  gooseisgone  replied to  Dulay @1.1.26    3 weeks ago
Anyone who hasn't seen or heard Trump's racism either hasn't been paying attention or is lying to themselves.

Oh yes..........so many times you can't list one, what a joke.

 
 
 
Dulay
1.1.30  Dulay  replied to  gooseisgone @1.1.29    3 weeks ago

You and yours really could use some education on how to cogently form interrogatories. 

 
 
 
gooseisgone
1.1.31  gooseisgone  replied to  Dulay @1.1.30    3 weeks ago
You and yours really could use some education

Right..........still waiting on all the racism claims, 

 
 
 
Dulay
1.1.32  Dulay  replied to  gooseisgone @1.1.31    3 weeks ago
Right..........still waiting on all the racism claims,

If your desperate for claims of racism, go watch the RNC again.

 
 
 
Tessylo
1.2  Tessylo  replied to  JBB @1    one month ago

Stupid is as stupid does . . . 

 
 
 
Freedom Warrior
1.3  Freedom Warrior  replied to  JBB @1    one month ago

At some point enough will be enough and freedom loving patriots will put an end to the Dems skullduggery.

 

 
 
 
FLYNAVY1
1.3.1  FLYNAVY1  replied to  Freedom Warrior @1.3    one month ago

Careful..... FW

Trump Kool-Aid has been proven toxic, and detrimental to human life.  It is also shown to be addictive, retards brain function, impairs judgement,  and makes one more susceptible to Covid-19.  Additional side effects are, but not limited to enhanced gullibility, racism, acceptance of authoritarianism, destruction of constitutional norms,  acceptance of Russian influence, willing destruction of secular governance, and elevated susceptibility to conspiracy theories. 

[Deleted]

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
2  Buzz of the Orient    one month ago

I've already asked that very question, but to no avail, because there are those on NT who continue to blindly follow, even emulate, their Pied Piper.  His attempts to stifle mail-in ballots made me think he was capable of going so far as to blow the electricity sources in America to prevent anyone from watching the DNC virtual convention. 

 
 
 
Adam_Selene
2.1  Adam_Selene  replied to  Buzz of the Orient @2    one month ago
made me think he was capable of going so far as to blow the electricity sources in America to prevent anyone from watching the DNC virtual convention

Now I know that squirrels can shut down power grids - I'm just not sure if being squirrelly is enough to do it.

 
 
 
JBB
2.1.1  seeder  JBB  replied to  Adam_Selene @2.1    one month ago

Maybe if squirrel has moose for sidekick...

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
2.1.2  Bob Nelson  replied to  JBB @2.1.1    one month ago

512

 
 
 
dennis smith
2.2  dennis smith  replied to  Buzz of the Orient @2    one month ago

What you said is exactly how the left responded to the original Pied Piper of politics - OBAMA

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
2.2.1  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  dennis smith @2.2    one month ago

Obama did not try to sabotage the election as Trump wanted to do by preventing what he knew would be mostly Democrat mail-in ballots.  As much as I ended up having no love for Obama, his quality of governance was so far superior to Trump's there is no comparison that could be drawn between his supporters and Trump's. 

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
2.2.2  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Buzz of the Orient @2.2.1    one month ago
his quality of governance was so far superior to Trump's there is no comparison

Yeah, but you forgot what apparently is the most qualifying aspect of Trump for many of his supporters compared to Obama, he's not black...

 
 
 
Greg Jones
2.3  Greg Jones  replied to  Buzz of the Orient @2    one month ago

[Deleted]

 
 
 
Raven Wing
2.4  Raven Wing  replied to  Buzz of the Orient @2    one month ago
His attempts to stifle mail-in ballots made me think he was capable of going so far as to blow the electricity sources in America to prevent anyone from watching the DNC virtual convention. 

Trump has already said that the only way he would lose is if the election is rigged. So there is his way out of accepting the election results if he does not win. 

And then there is this from the WH as to whether or not he will accept the election if he loses. 

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/white-house-declines-to-say-whether-trump-will-accept-election-results/ar-BB189THA?li=BBnb7Kz

So he is already prepping his base and armed militia to prevent his being made to leave the WH if he loses. He has also stated that he will run for a third term. 

Are you listening America?  Trump plans to refuse to accept the results of the election if he loses. And he is doing all he can to make sure that he wins, by hook or crook, which is his forte, and the only way he knows how to win.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
3  JohnRussell    one month ago

Back in the spring of 2016, when it began to be clear that Trump would be the GOP nominee, I said that sooner or later America would have to confront Trump supporters. The point came, even that long ago, when his supporters became more of a problem and threat to our nation than Trump himself. 

Of course I have been attacked and harassed by Trump supporters on NT pretty much every day since.  All I can tell them is that they are the problem here, not me.  They are the ones who mindlessly support the worst president in U.S. history, not me. 

They really should be hoping he loses, so they can finally get off the hook. There isnt a chance in hell Donald Trump will ever be judged by history to be a decent president or even a decent human being.  His followers are deluded and only fooling themselves. History will not be kind. 

 
 
 
sixpick
3.1  sixpick  replied to  JohnRussell @3    one month ago

I liked the 'Good Ole Days', didn't you?

 
 
 
sixpick
3.1.1  sixpick  replied to  sixpick @3.1    one month ago

Think about that, making up his own facts.  This clip above was May 2017 when the US Labor Bureau of Statics put these statistics out.

Seven states at historically low unemployment rates in May 2017

June 22, 2017

In May 2017, unemployment rates in seven states were at their lowest levels since the state unemployment data series began in January 1976. Colorado had the lowest unemployment rate in May, 2.3 percent, followed by North Dakota, 2.5 percent, both of which were the lowest rates ever recorded in those states. The rates in Arkansas (3.4 percent), California (4.7 percent), Mississippi (4.9 percent), Oregon (3.6 percent), and Washington (4.5 percent) were also at series lows. Alaska and New Mexico had the highest jobless rates among the states, 6.7 percent and 6.6 percent, respectively.

https://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2017/seven-states-at-historically-low-unemployment-rates-in-may-2017.htm

 
 
 
JohnRussell
3.1.2  JohnRussell  replied to  sixpick @3.1.1    one month ago

didnt watch the video and am not going to, but dont you think that in Jun of 2017 Barack Obama was more responsible for the low unemployment rate at that time than Trump was ? 

 
 
 
sixpick
3.1.3  sixpick  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1.2    one month ago

Now how can you learn anything if you refuse to open your eyes and see and open your ears and hear?

Well, here's some more from US Labor Bureau of Statistics for May 2018.

May 2018

Gosh, man!  Picked that up from Bunker Joe.  Pretty good, huh?  Here's a transcript I worked up for you.

Joe:  "That's what I hear from all the Trump supporters that I talk to who were Trump voters and are still Trump supporters.  Tthey say yea, yea, you guys are going crazy.  He's doing, what do you think of the President, he's doing exactly what he said he was going to do."

Mika:  "Well and I think the danger you know that uh, uh, as is here, is he is trying to undermine the media , trying to make up his own facts and it could be while unemployment and the economy uh, uh, worsens he could have undermined the messaging so much that he can actually control ah, exactly what people think and that is, that is our job."

Don't ask me to do that again, especially for Mika!!!

 
 
 
pat wilson
3.1.4  pat wilson  replied to  sixpick @3.1.3    one month ago

You've got a lot of links. What are your conclusions ?

 
 
 
sixpick
3.1.5  sixpick  replied to  pat wilson @3.1.4    one month ago

Pat, you'd have to look at the video and work your way down to understand the point and conclusions.

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
3.1.6  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  sixpick @3.1.3    one month ago
Now how can you learn anything if you refuse to open your eyes and see and open your ears and hear
Trumpers are known for that.
 
 
 
Tessylo
3.1.7  Tessylo  replied to  sixpick @3.1.5    one month ago

"Pat, you'd have to look at the video and work your way down to understand the point and conclusions."

What a waste of time that would be.  

You should post your conclusions instead of a shitload of links and ask us to come to our conclusions.  

What a mishmosh of links you've thrown together.  

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
3.1.8  Bob Nelson  replied to  Tessylo @3.1.7    one month ago
What a mishmosh of links you've thrown together.

It's a method. Throw up a ton of links - no matter their relevance - in hopes that the interlocutor will waste lots of time, discovering that there was no point.

The purpose is not to arrive at the truth. The purpose is to "win".

"Win what?," you ask. Good question.

 
 
 
pat wilson
3.1.9  pat wilson  replied to  sixpick @3.1.5    one month ago

Or you could simply condense that into one or two coherent conclusions.

BTW who is "Bunker Joe" ? You may be thinking of Bunker trump. Remember when he was ushered  to the White House basement when there were loud protestors outside ? 

even as some of his campaign advisers were recommending that he deliver a televised address to an anxious nation.

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/31/us/politics/trump-protests-george-floyd.html

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
3.1.10  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  sixpick @3.1.1    one month ago
In May 2017...

Donald Trump had only been in office for four months and had passed no related bills and done nothing to help further reduce unemployment, he was just riding the trend already created by President Obama who had seen it drop to 4.7% by January 2017 under his watch. Getting another half percent by May (4.1% national unemployment) was inevitable no matter who won the election that year as it had been steadily dropping since May 2016.

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
3.2  Bob Nelson  replied to  JohnRussell @3    one month ago

There are three different populations among Trump supporters:
1 TrumpTrueBelieversTM, adepts in a sect, who literally cannot believe that their Prophet is less than perfect;
2 TrumpApostles TM, senior members of the sect, who transmit the Prophet's Word, with instructions on how to diffuse it (via forums like NT, for example);
3 TrumpBloodsuckersTM, the cynics who gull the TrumpTrueBelieversTM, selling everything from MAGA caps to books to speeches to ...

None of these can ever recognize the slightest fault in the Prophet, whether by fervent Belief or by gutter-level self-interest.

 
 
 
MUVA
3.2.1  MUVA  replied to  Bob Nelson @3.2    one month ago

You forgot the fourth people that will never voter for leftist garbage.

 
 
 
sixpick
3.2.2  sixpick  replied to  Bob Nelson @3.2    one month ago

Carrying on with Mika's "It's our job to control what people think", this fellow, who, by the way must be in one of your 3 categories of Trump supporters.  He can't be black.  The Democrat plantation is very deceitful and even I don't run around telling everyone I'm a Trump supporter because you know, it can be pretty dangerous.  I think this fellow can take care of himself, though.  We'll show our faces when we vote for Donald Trump at our own peril, but we still believe in freedom for all and will put ourselves out risk.  Of course the Democrats will be filling out voter ballots in the rest homes for the elderly, so we have a real job ahead of us.

 
 
 
Transyferous Rex
3.2.3  Transyferous Rex  replied to  sixpick @3.2.2    one month ago
"There's clear disdain that I have for this president, but look at the facts," the "Morning Joe" co-host said. "Look at how he's worn us down, from his paid-off porn star to Russia lies to racism in Charlottesville, racism across the board, children in cages...

The only thing open and honest about the comment is her disdain. Russia lies? Is she talking about the lies Clinesmith is in the news for? Kids in cages...during Obama's admin? Racism? Holy shit, if it weren't for Trump, there never would have been slaves in the US, right? 

 
 
 
The Magic Eight Ball
3.2.4  The Magic Eight Ball  replied to  Transyferous Rex @3.2.3    one month ago
Is she talking about the lies Clinesmith is in the news for?

clinesmith?  who is that?

LOL

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
3.2.5  Bob Nelson  replied to  sixpick @3.2.2    one month ago

There is no reason why a Black cannot be a TrumpTrueBelieverTM.

TrumpTrueBelieversTM, by definition, believe the Prophet's Word rather than the evidence of their own eyes... so there's no reason a Black cannot be blind to Trump's racism.

 
 
 
Transyferous Rex
3.2.6  Transyferous Rex  replied to  The Magic Eight Ball @3.2.4    one month ago
clinesmith?  who is that?

Right? Nothing to see here folks. 

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
3.2.7  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  sixpick @3.2.2    one month ago

Another village is missing its idiot.

 
 
 
sixpick
3.2.8  sixpick  replied to  Transyferous Rex @3.2.3    one month ago

No wonder they have such a hard time.  They open a book, read a page and wonder why they don't understand what the book is about.  Geezzzzzzz.......

 
 
 
Transyferous Rex
3.2.9  Transyferous Rex  replied to  sixpick @3.2.8    one month ago

If they are like my sister, they read a page, claim to know everything the book is about, and get offended when confronted with the realities of the book. 

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
3.2.10  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Transyferous Rex @3.2.9    one month ago

Sounds like a few of our liberal friends here

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
3.2.11  Bob Nelson  replied to  Transyferous Rex @3.2.9    one month ago

Wow. That's awesome.

You have a sister who is representative of all of them!

Wow!

 
 
 
Transyferous Rex
3.2.12  Transyferous Rex  replied to  Bob Nelson @3.2.11    one month ago
Wow. That's awesome. You have a sister who is representative of all of them!

No, she isn't, which assertion cannot even be inferred from my comment. Apparently, you failed to read the first 6 words of the comment, to-wit: 

If they are like my sister

The irony here amazing. My comment clearly suggests that some people, like my sister, read only a portion of a work, then make claims on the substance thereof. Then you come along. 

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
3.2.13  Bob Nelson  replied to  Transyferous Rex @3.2.12    one month ago

So... you are citing your sister because........ she isn't representative of anything...?

Look... lots of us have problems with our sibs. I do. But NT is probably not the best place to try to gauge the extent of those problems.

 
 
 
Transyferous Rex
3.2.14  Transyferous Rex  replied to  Bob Nelson @3.2.13    one month ago

Its actually a great place. I already had a good sense that you shared many things in common with her. You've backed that up twice with your responses to me.

1) You didn't read, or deliberately ignored, portions of the 1st comment. Which was the very subject of the comment you responded to. Again, the irony there is amazing. and,

2) When faced with the plain flaw with your first comment, you fall straight to a position of unreasonableness. You went from my sister representing everyone to my sister being representative of nothing. I got it. You are Darth Plagueis. Only the Sith deal in such absolutes as you are attempting to apply here. 

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
3.2.15  Bob Nelson  replied to  Transyferous Rex @3.2.14    one month ago

... OK... I give up...

Why are you citing your sister?

 
 
 
Greg Jones
3.3  Greg Jones  replied to  JohnRussell @3    one month ago

We've heard it all before, and no matter how many times it's repeated, it's still bullshit.

No matter what Republican got elected, this same foolishness would still be going on.

Progressives keep losing elections for very good reasons, the main one being is they can't govern.

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
3.3.1  Bob Nelson  replied to  Greg Jones @3.3    one month ago
No matter what Republican got elected, this same foolishness would still be going on.

Do you think that Trump is "just another Republican"? It seems to me that he is either different or a distillation. Other Republicans have shown disdain for democratic norms, but none so blatantly as Trump.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
3.3.2  Sean Treacy  replied to  Bob Nelson @3.3.1    one month ago

It doesn’t matter.  Crazed leftists attacked bush’s first inauguration and immediately talked about impeaching him. Then forged docs were used against him in 2004. Bush derangement syndrome was the Original derangement syndrome. Then McCain was, In the words of John Lewis, the same as a church bomber.  The Democratic leader of The senate proudly lied about Romney’s  tax returns while joe Biden claimed he would put black people back in chains. 

it goes back further, Goldwater was a Nazi, Reagan, per the speaker of the house, was evil. I could go on and on. 

it doesnt matter who the republican is, the response is always over the top hysteria from Democrats. 

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
3.3.3  Bob Nelson  replied to  Sean Treacy @3.3.2    one month ago
Goldwater was a Nazi

That's terrible! Do you have a link?

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
3.3.4  Sean Treacy  replied to  Bob Nelson @3.3.3    one month ago

look up cbs news’s coverage of the 1964 Republican convention.  I can’t remember the reporters name off hand.  

Here a sample of some psychiatrists calling Goldwater crazy with a hitler like profile:

Ruth Adams of New York replied that she saw in the GOP candidate “a strong identification with the authoritarianism of Hitler, if not identification with Hitler himself,” and other responding psychiatrists echoed that theme. “I believe Goldwater has the same pathological make-up as Hitler, Castro, Stalin and other known schizophrenic leaders,” wrote Chester M. Johnson, Jr., of Long Beach, while Philadelphia’s Paul Fink observed that, like the Führer, the Republican nominee “appeals to the unconscious sadism and hostility in the average human being.” G. Templeton, of Glen Cove, New York, warned that “if Goldwater wins the Presidency, both you and I will be among the first into the concentration camps.”“

The left has been playing from the same playbook for 50 plus years.

funny how modern progressives wax poetic about him now that he’s safely dead.

 
 
 
dennis smith
3.3.5  dennis smith  replied to  Greg Jones @3.3    one month ago

That is evidenced by the riots in several Dem led cities for sure.

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
3.3.6  Bob Nelson  replied to  Sean Treacy @3.3.4    one month ago

So... the answer is "No, you do not have a link."

You accuse "crazed leftists" and the Democrats... but then you cite random guys who you say are psychiatrists. You give no indication of why you consider their opinions significant.

I have never heard of these guys - that's not necessarily a problem...... But they return zero hits in a Google-search... which kinda is a problem.

Either you are citing quidams of no standing, which would be a worthless attempt to cover the fact that you have no serious source for your accusation... or you're just makin' shit up because hey!

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
3.3.7  Sean Treacy  replied to  Bob Nelson @3.3.6    one month ago

  answer is "No, you do not have a link."

I'm sorry Bob, I thought you were familiar with American history. I didn't think the genesis of the "Goldwater rule" needed a link. But here you go:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goldwater_rule#:~:text=The%20Goldwater%20rule%20is%20Section,obtained%20consent%20to%20discuss%20their

To recap, psychiatrists, without actually evaluating Goldwater,  compared him to Hitler in an article  and slandered him in the same way all Republicans get slandered by Democrats. The article then got promoted in all the major liberal newspapers.  This so embarrased the APA they passed a rule to stop psychiatrists from diagnosing public figures (though they continue to do it with Republicans with regularity) 

t they return zero hits in a Google-search... which kinda is  a problem.

You must have a problem with Google! A simple cut and paste of the quote I provided returned numerous hits.

Here's one

https://www.city-journal.org/html/goldwater-takedown-14787.html

, “us source for your accusation... or you're just makin' shit up because hey!

Nah, I just overestimated your ability to use Google. For me, googling quotes is pretty easy.  I'll try and remember you aren't so skilled. 

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
3.3.8  Bob Nelson  replied to  Sean Treacy @3.3.7    one month ago

I'm sorry, Sean... I thought you were talking about

Crazed leftists ...

...  oh, wait...   you were talking about "crazed leftists"...

... who suddenly morphed into... psychiatrists...

Did you perhaps intend to say "crazed leftist psychiatrists"? That's quite a demographic!

Since you apparently did not read my post , I'll repeat it here: " I have never heard of these [persons whom you cited nominatively , Sean] - that's not necessarily a problem...... But they return zero hits in a Google-search... which kinda is a problem."

Sean... you chose to cite those persons, as if their opinion was important at the time. If that was the case... Google has forgotten them...

And then... you changed to a different Google search. And hey! You have one that works for you! Isn't that amazing??

You're sure to always be right, Sean, when you change the subject to whatever you want, right in the middle of the conversation.

     jrSmiley_78_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
sixpick
3.3.9  sixpick  replied to  Sean Treacy @3.3.2    one month ago

I guess Adam Schiff's name is blacked out in so many words.  These people are desperate.  They know the poop is coming down the drain toward the sewer where they live.

Actually I don't blame them for being desperate.  They have good reason to be.

 
 
 
dennis smith
3.4  dennis smith  replied to  JohnRussell @3    one month ago

You are welcome to your opinion.

 
 
 
MUVA
4  MUVA    one month ago

Morning Joe and the ugly ho Mika has won the dumbest women on TV award 5 years straight.  

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
5  Sean Treacy    one month ago

Mika and Joe were Trump's biggest cheerleaders back in 2015 and 2016. Trump hasn't changed since then so Mika and Joe can't use that as a defense to justify their 180.

But once the liberal watchdogs got upset with them, they over corrected.  After all, they work for MSNBC and only one narrative is acceptable there. 

https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/morning-blow-how-joe-and-mika-became-trumps-lapdogs-90992/

So they changed tunes for a paycheck.  And apparently people still take them seriously..... 

 
 
 
dennis smith
5.1  dennis smith  replied to  Sean Treacy @5    one month ago

Correct, they sold their souls to a network that controls what they say.

 
 
 
Sparty On
6  Sparty On    one month ago

This is classic.  

We are suppose to listen to this "triggered" liberal lemming?

Hilarious!

 
 
 
XDm9mm
7  XDm9mm    one month ago

Not much more needs to be said than what this man said:

GetAttachmentThumbnail?id=AQMkADAwATExADgyNy00YzQwLTU2NzItMDACLTAwCgBGAAADZTvya2yEokK%2ByGwlJDQFEwcAOIfqf34QmU2nLQ9E%2BGpIRgAAAgEMAAAAOIfqf34QmU2nLQ9E%2BGpIRgAEe%2BDqIgAAAAESABAAFapubAAQkUqPfNhgvlU25w%3D%3D&thumbnailType=2&owa=outlook.live.com&scriptVer=2020081002.06&isc=1&X-OWA-CANARY=QfG2UPw4pkiDuAqjXlxxkJDC6saQQ9gYiMRaiA9Qodu-1ps5HJlaaE8FhVr4w770u8_iNC90aKs.&token=eyJhbGciOiJSUzI1NiIsImtpZCI6IjU2MzU4ODUyMzRCOTI1MkRERTAwNTc2NkQ5RDlGMjc2NTY1RjYzRTIiLCJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJ4NXQiOiJWaldJVWpTNUpTM2VBRmRtMmRueWRsWmZZLUkifQ.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.KXzBhMkpdssYADISpW7qqMViBdigxJtuWSz2aMokRhE25g_iPaMsg63FB3kEL17EiYwBFgbg_JTxMJlVmzMbpM_Q31KehPovQ3oUqJD3WjIfxJwrajizFX2D-pGBjtf6FDFYijTfXt6Sq4bBZOi7sNV9DHCAWeQU1rvMj68i8zmmKGRYLRUwa-GOXk4QpOFViUf15ggYPSKTPP8ZIsQsWf8SMVo0oiFgFw9Q5y0GtzzNuVVGRQQfrRf8hi4S9ZdVul2BKjZHegWeRr8J7YkWqWw5RsxLS8KX8-TNfKWAyVw4PTdFyLG0aHny4NNBCHdDcbgP9-LB8MMbAJ-cV5k6Sg&animation=true

 
 
 
Sparty On
7.1  Sparty On  replied to  XDm9mm @7    one month ago

Now that is one long assed link but it don't work compadre

 
 
 
XDm9mm
7.1.1  XDm9mm  replied to  Sparty On @7.1    one month ago
Now that is one long assed link but it don't work compadre

Why not brother?  Once all was said and done, at the bottom of what COVID did to this country economically, it was actually still better than what Obama left.

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
7.1.2  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  XDm9mm @7.1.1    one month ago

Ummm I think he meant your link doesn't work......

 
 
 
Sparty On
7.1.3  Sparty On  replied to  XDm9mm @7.1.1    one month ago

Yep, that link is DOA ....

 
 
 
Tessylo
8  Tessylo    one month ago

All that nonsense and the link doesn't work!

jrSmiley_78_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
freepress
9  freepress    one month ago

Don't ask a question that you don't already know the answer to, willful ignorance is the defining characteristic of anyone who avoids facing the reality of a failed presidency and still supports that level of failure.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
9.1  Greg Jones  replied to  freepress @9    one month ago

It's still going strong, has not failed

Facts are fun

 
 
 
Tessylo
9.1.1  Tessylo  replied to  Greg Jones @9.1    one month ago

[DELETED]

 
 
 
bugsy
9.1.2  bugsy  replied to  Tessylo @9.1.1    one month ago

[DELETED]

 
 
 
dennis smith
10  dennis smith    one month ago

Agreed, it is a good thing that there are presidential term limits that limited Obama's failed presidency to 2 terms. 

 
 
 
Freedom Warrior
11  Freedom Warrior    4 weeks ago

Well people certainly know how stupid that cucking funt Mika is.

 
 
 
Dulay
11.1  Dulay  replied to  Freedom Warrior @11    4 weeks ago

Classy. 

 
 
 
Adam_Selene
12  Adam_Selene    4 weeks ago

It might make one feel better but it is pointless to call your opposition stupid.

Can I find any points in common with a Trump supporter. No.

Can I find any points in common with a constitutionally conservative Republican - there might be a couple. Some goals - yes - but the path to those goals - no.

Do I entertain any hope that a government requiring compromise with the present Republican party would produce something I would approve of. No.

So there really is not any reason for prolonged debates. "Your mama wears Army boots." "So does yours." After that, I'm ready to find a new seed to do research for.

Short of a two state solution, I'm afraid we will, as a country, careen left and right until my generation and perhaps another dies off.

But I'm optimistic - perhaps our  great grandchildren will turn out to be better at this.

 
 
Loading...
Loading...

Who is online




Sean Treacy
Dismayed Patriot
arkpdx
Paula Bartholomew
Ed-NavDoc


27 visitors