╌>

Derek Chauvin Trial Devastating To Witnesses And A Juror

  

Category:  News & Politics

By:  john-russell  •  5 years ago  •  68 comments

Derek Chauvin Trial Devastating To Witnesses And A Juror


Powerful testimony and footage from Chauvin murder trial. 

Witnesses are breaking down in tears, repeatedly. One of the jurors has told the judge she was physically overcome by stress after yesterday's testimony. 

They just played footage of Floyd being put into the squad where he continuously bleats out that he has claustrophobia . There has been the allegation in the past that Floyd fought with the cops. That did not happen. He was handcuffed behind his back. For what appears to be little cause they place Floyd on the pavement and kneel on him. 

Watching all this, one has to assume, that with the "whole world" watching this devastating evidence, if Chauvin is acquitted there will be more "rioting" . Why wouldn't there be ? 


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1  author  JohnRussell    5 years ago

I wouldnt be too surprised, given the video footage, if there are protests on the street during the trial. 

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
3  Ronin2    5 years ago
Watching all this, one has to assume, that with the "whole world" watching this devastating evidence, if Chauvin is acquitted there will be more "rioting" . Why wouldn't there be ? 

If Chauvin doesn't get a harsh enough charge for those on the extreme left there will be rioting. If Chauvin gets charged and the rest are let off, there will be rioting. [deleted]

[The deleted] don't need any damn excuses for rioting.  [(labeling)]

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4  Vic Eldred    5 years ago

I've been watching the coverage on MSNBC.

The trial with the pre-determined ending. We need to put it on all networks/s

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
4.1  author  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @4    5 years ago

It is extremely difficult to see what Floyd did that made the cops think they should kneel on his neck for 9 minutes. Good luck with that "I was distracted defense" that Chauvin's lawyer is using. Talk about desperation. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4.1.1  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @4.1    5 years ago
It is extremely difficult to see what Floyd did that made the cops think they should kneel on his neck for 9 minutes.

There was no excuse for the 9 minutes, despite the practice being part of Minneapolis Police policy at the time.


Good luck with that "I was distracted defense" that Chauvin's lawyer is using. 

Lol, thus MSNBC has described it. Floyd resisted arrest, correct?. The film we saw for the first time yesterday showed that they actually had Floyd in the police car. I never saw that film before. My real interest at this point, is finding out what Floyd did while in the car that caused those cops to get him back out and down on the ground.

As to the trial, I think Chauvin is clearly guilty of manslaughter, but I am convinced he will be found guilty on the more serious murder charge, which is what they are charging him with.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4.1.2  Vic Eldred  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.1.1    5 years ago

One more note:

"A key witness who was with   George Floyd   on the day he died has informed the court that he will invoke the Fifth Amendment if asked to testify in Derek Chauvin's murder trial.

The Hennepin County Public Defender's Office filed a notice Wednesday on behalf of Morries Lester Hall, 42, who was in the car with Floyd when police approached him for allegedly using a fake $20 bill at Cup Foods in Minneapolis. 

"Mr. Morries Lester Hall, through undersigned counsel, hereby provides notice to all parties in this matter that if called to testify he will invoke his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination,"  said a notice filed  by assistant public defender Adrienne Cousins. "Therefore, counsel for Mr. Hall respectfully moves this court to quash the subpoena ... and release Mr. Hall from any obligations therein."



How many people knew that Floyd had a friend in his car with him?

"Many judges would be miffed about a witness who is actively engaging in public interviews about what he saw while refusing to do so under oath. However, Hall clearly has a constitutional right to refuse to testify." ...Jonathan Turley

I'm not so "miffed."

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4.1.5  Vic Eldred  replied to  Tessylo @4.1.3    5 years ago
It was murder.

Of course, why else would Keith Ellison make that the charge?/s

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
4.1.7  author  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.1.2    5 years ago

What does the person in the car with Floyd have to do with what Chauvin did? 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4.1.9  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @4.1.7    5 years ago

It opens a few doors for the defense. If the person in the car was a drug dealer (which he was) it could give some background as to why police were called in the first place. Remember the clerk who took the fake $20?  He said he thought Floyd was on something. My point is that his testimony would only be desirable to the defense.

What Chauvin did relates to what went on in the back of the squad car. I think we can agree that it was beyond what was necessary.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4.1.10  Vic Eldred  replied to  Tessylo @4.1.8    5 years ago

Did you want to have a trial?

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
4.1.12  author  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.1.9    5 years ago

The murder of George Floyd does not stem from him being placed on the ground with his his hands cuffed behind his back. The murder stems from what happened after that. 

Someone on pavement with his hands cuffed behind his back is not capable of much resisting, particularly when there are three or four cops within 10 ft of him. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
4.1.13  author  JohnRussell  replied to  JohnRussell @4.1.12    5 years ago

I am aware that multiple people have been trolling this article. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4.1.14  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @4.1.12    5 years ago
The murder of George Floyd

Murder requires intent. You know that right?

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4.1.16  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @4.1.13    5 years ago
I am aware that multiple people have been trolling this article. 

It is being covered on MSNBC. You happen to have an article on it. I'll be glad to leave it.

It's interesting what people call trolling. A discussion is trolling. Smearing people 24/7 is not. Got it.  Good by John.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
4.1.17  bugsy  replied to  Tessylo @4.1.15    5 years ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
5  Vic Eldred    5 years ago

Right now we are finding out why Morries Hall has invoked the 5th.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
7  Vic Eldred    5 years ago

Can you imagine watching MSNBC all morning?  Not bad if you can ignore the analysis. I think the trial is moving right along as expected. I'll give an A to the prosecution. It may be the state's finest.

More analysis: The claim that Floyd's girlfriend may have connected with the jury. What's really connecting with that jury is the thought of Minneapolis going up in flames if they don't vote guilty of "murder" in 2nd or 3rd degree!

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Participates
7.1  Thrawn 31  replied to  Vic Eldred @7    5 years ago

Or the fact that the asshole with the badge knelt on the guys neck until he died, for no apparent reason, and it was witnessed by numerous people and the whole thing is on video. 

I doubt too many are going to vote either way out of a fear of rioting.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
7.1.1  Vic Eldred  replied to  Thrawn 31 @7.1    5 years ago
I doubt too many are going to vote either way out of a fear of rioting.

The judge, the prosecutor, the defense and ya, the jury all are thinking about the impending threat of rioting. The verdict is guilty of murder, whether or not it applies. You heard it here first.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
7.1.3  Vic Eldred  replied to  Tessylo @7.1.2    5 years ago

Well, that settles it. Let's save the time and money on this trial.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
7.1.5  Vic Eldred  replied to  Tessylo @7.1.4    5 years ago

I'll have to remember that!

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
7.1.7  bugsy  replied to  Tessylo @7.1.4    5 years ago

Who cares what the fake black dude says?

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
7.1.8  bugsy  replied to  Tessylo @7.1.6    5 years ago

t4288kn5jfmz.jpg

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
7.1.11  bugsy  replied to  Tessylo @7.1.10    5 years ago

Woof woof...tweet   tweet 

Now, what did I whistle?

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
7.1.13  bugsy  replied to    5 years ago
I wish I was in Dixie..

well, being that i already am...

no wishing necessary.

what"s your point?

 
 

Who is online







242 visitors