╌>

Former Defense Secretary Robert Gates said none of the 8 presidents he served would recognize the GOP today, saying its values are 'hard to find these days'

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  flynavy1  •  4 years ago  •  89 comments

By:   wbostock@businessinsider.com (Bill Bostock) 3 hrs ago (MSN)

Former Defense Secretary Robert Gates said none of the 8 presidents he served would recognize the GOP today, saying its values are 'hard to find these days'
Robert Gates told CBS he agreed that Trump's baseless election claims provided the US's enemies an opportunity to say it's "a declining power."

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



© CBS Former Defense Secretary Robert Gates on "Face the Nation" on Sunday. CBS

  • Robert Gates told CBS on Sunday that traditional GOP values were "hard to find these days."
  • He said none of the presidents he served, including five Republicans, would recognize the party now.
  • He agreed that Trump's election claims gave enemies an opportunity to say the US is "a declining power."
  • See more stories on Insider's business page.

Former Defense Secretary Robert Gates rebuked the Republican Party on Sunday, saying none of the presidents he served would recognize it today.

"I worked for eight presidents. Five of them were Republicans. I don't think any of them would recognize the Republican Party today," Gates, a Republican, told CBS News' "Face the Nation."

"The values and the principles that the Republican Party stood for under those five presidents are hard to find these days," he told the host John Dickerson.

Dickerson also asked whether the Capitol riot and former President Donald Trump's baseless claims that the 2020 election was rigged gave "an opportunity to America's enemies to say America is a declining power," and Gates said he agreed.

Replay Video SETTINGS OFF HD HQ SD LO Skip Ad

But Gates said he didn't think many Republican lawmakers actually thought the 2020 election was fraudulent, calling the claim "political gaming rather than a real conviction."

He also praised Rep. Liz Cheney, who earlier this month was ousted from her congressional GOP leadership role for refusing to back Trump's election-fraud claims, saying she was a person "of real integrity."

Gates began his career with the CIA in the late 1960s and ended it as President Barack Obama's defense secretary in 2011. He had also served Presidents Lyndon B. Johnson, Richard Nixon, Gerald Ford, Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan, George H. W. Bush, and George W. Bush.


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
FLYNAVY1
Professor Participates
1  seeder  FLYNAVY1    4 years ago

I'm sure Robert Gates is considered a RINO these days.

I always considered him pretty centered, and a person that put country first.  Eight of our former presidents seemed to think so.....

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
2  Kavika     4 years ago

They have become the party of ''no'' and delusional thinking. 

 
 
 
FLYNAVY1
Professor Participates
2.1  seeder  FLYNAVY1  replied to  Kavika @2    4 years ago

How many times does a person need to hear at a dinner party that they've had enough to drink before they get the message and decide to sit down.....  

The GOP right now is filled with bad drunks.  They are either drunk on their own power, or drunk on the lies told by their leaders.  In some cases, both.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
3  Trout Giggles    4 years ago

He served quite a few presidents. I think he knows what he's talking about

 
 
 
FLYNAVY1
Professor Participates
3.1  seeder  FLYNAVY1  replied to  Trout Giggles @3    4 years ago

I'd say he's a Goldwater Republican.... pretty much where I'm at.

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
3.1.1  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  FLYNAVY1 @3.1    4 years ago

I still remember when he got up in the Pope's grill when he condoned overpopulation (large families).  Goldwater said to him "You no playa the game, you no makea the rules."  

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
3.1.2  devangelical  replied to  Paula Bartholomew @3.1.1    4 years ago

goldwater knew what a domestic threat bible thumpers posed to our democracy.

 
 
 
FLYNAVY1
Professor Participates
3.1.4  seeder  FLYNAVY1  replied to  devangelical @3.1.2    4 years ago

goldwater knew what a domestic threat bible thumpers posed to our democracy.

Yep, accepted dumbing down of society while creating division within America.  The "were closer to God than you are so were better" syndrome.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Expert
4  Tessylo    4 years ago

Todays' gop/gqp/republicans have no values or standards or principles or morals or empathy or . . . . . . . . . . . . 

#45 and his criminal enterprise of an administration tried to burn it all down and give us a great big fuck you on their way out the door and they're still at it now with all these bogus recounts

.  
They should never get a chance to get anywhere near the White House for very long time    

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
4.1  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Tessylo @4    4 years ago
Todays' gop/gqp/republicans have no values or standards or principles or morals or empathy

It's because a serial liar and accused sexual predator whispered sweet nothings in their ear like "I'll ban abortion, build a wall to keep out the Mexicans and give America back to white Christian evangelicals..." then grabbed them by the pussy, and instead of slapping the hand away they grabbed his wrist and tried to shove it in further like a desperate deplorable prostitute.

 
 
 
Duck Hawk
Freshman Silent
4.1.1  Duck Hawk  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @4.1    4 years ago

lovely description, LMAO, sounds like it's pretty accurate. I'm sure their god will have something to say to them. Ignoring your tenants of faith for political expediency is is truly "Christ-Like." 

small "c" Christians anyone. 

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
6  Nerm_L    4 years ago

Robert Gates claims the five Republican Presidents he served would not recognize today's Republican Party.

 Would someone, please, explain why that is a bad thing.  

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
6.2  Trout Giggles  replied to  Nerm_L @6    4 years ago

His name is Robert

 
 
 
Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom
Professor Guide
6.2.1  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom  replied to  Trout Giggles @6.2    4 years ago
His name is Robert

You beat me by 16 seconds.  I went back through the seed to look for Bill's involvement, but couldn't find anything about it.  

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
6.2.2  Nerm_L  replied to  Trout Giggles @6.2    4 years ago
His name is Robert

Yes, it is.  Robert Gates.  My mistake.  I've edited my error.  Thank you for pointing it out.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
6.2.3  Trout Giggles  replied to  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom @6.2.1    4 years ago

I almost screwed up and said his name was David.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
6.2.4  JohnRussell  replied to  Trout Giggles @6.2.3    4 years ago

You have now exhausted the world supply of well known Gates. 

 
 
 
Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom
Professor Guide
6.3  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom  replied to  Nerm_L @6    4 years ago

Not sure what Bill Gates has to do with any of this.  Please clarify. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
6.3.1  JohnRussell  replied to  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom @6.3    4 years ago

Posters should always try to check their entries for typos. If you don't you are potentially subject to correction/mild ridicule. 

Better safe than sorry. 

What don't they understand about that ? 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
6.5  JohnRussell  replied to  Nerm_L @6    4 years ago
Gates claims the five Republican Presidents he served would not recognize today's Republican Party.  Would someone, please, explain why that is a bad thing.  

Well, you are correct in the sense that some Republicans are proud of the fact that they are proponents of Trumpism. 

There are unexplained mysteries arent there? 

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
6.5.2  Nerm_L  replied to  JohnRussell @6.5    4 years ago
Well, you are correct in the sense that some Republicans are proud of the fact that they are proponents of Trumpism.  There are unexplained mysteries arent there? 

And what, exactly, is Trumpism? 

Democrats don't want the Republican Party to change in spite of all their blathering.  That's why Democrats invest so much effort into keeping Ronald Reagan alive.

 
 
 
FLYNAVY1
Professor Participates
6.5.3  seeder  FLYNAVY1  replied to  Nerm_L @6.5.2    4 years ago

And what, exactly, is Trumpism? 

Trumpism - Wikipedia

Democrats don't want the Republican Party to change in spite of all their blathering.  That's why Democrats invest so much effort into keeping Ronald Reagan alive.

And I just just took you off ignore a week ago..... Now I see why I put you there in the first place.  

The only way I can see to detox you is by a strict diet of Reuters and BBC 

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
6.5.4  Ender  replied to  Nerm_L @6.5.2    4 years ago

Oh bull. It was the republicans themselves that kept Reagan alive, as their patron conservative saint.

Now he has been tossed to the scrapheap and replaced.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Expert
6.5.5  Tessylo  replied to  Nerm_L @6.5.2    4 years ago

Speaking of blathering . . . . 

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
6.5.6  Nerm_L  replied to  FLYNAVY1 @6.5.3    4 years ago
Trumpism - Wikipedia

Ah, the old "I know it when I see it" argument.  Defining Trumpism as the politics of Donald Trump and his supporters really doesn't explain very much.  

It seems that Democrats calling for national unity to support a populist Democratic agenda doesn't differ that much from Trump's politics.  How does Joe Biden chiding and scolding us about being Americans differ from Trump's more patriotic appeals for being Americans?

Democrats have dedicated themselves to proving Ronald Reagan was wrong about big government.  Democrats have a vested interest in keeping Ronald Reagan alive politically.  Trump wasn't a small government Republican, though.

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
6.5.7  Nerm_L  replied to  Ender @6.5.4    4 years ago
Oh bull. It was the republicans themselves that kept Reagan alive, as their patron conservative saint. Now he has been tossed to the scrapheap and replaced.

Yes, Republicans kept Ronald Reagan alive politically.  Until Trump showed up.

Why is it a bad thing that Nixon, Ford, Reagan, G.H.W Bush, and G.W. Bush would not recognize today's Republican Party?  Is that bad for Republicans or is that bad for Democrats?

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
6.5.8  Ronin2  replied to  Nerm_L @6.5.7    4 years ago
Why is it a bad thing that Nixon, Ford, Reagan, G.H.W Bush, and G.W. Bush would not recognize today's Republican Party?  Is that bad for Republicans or is that bad for Democrats?

The Democrats understood them because they were Establishment Republicans. All Establishment politicians are just different sides of the the same coin politically. They all answer to the same overall masters. That is acceptable. 

Can't have politicians that don't know their place and that won't kowtow to the proper people.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
6.5.9  JohnRussell  replied to  Nerm_L @6.5.7    4 years ago
Is that bad for Republicans or is that bad for Democrats?

It's bad for humanity, it's bad for decency. 

Followers of Trumpism have absolutely refused to hold Trump responsible for his mountainous amount of lies and corruption.  That is because they approve of the ideology - white grievance, white nationalism, christian theocracy, and the lure of the ideology is stronger than the desire to hold him to account. 

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
6.5.10  TᵢG  replied to  JohnRussell @6.5.9    4 years ago
Followers of Trumpism have absolutely refused to hold Trump responsible for his mountainous amount of lies and corruption. 

Worse, many of them inexplicably claim that Trump was correct and did no wrong.

 
 
 
FLYNAVY1
Professor Participates
6.5.11  seeder  FLYNAVY1  replied to  Nerm_L @6.5.6    4 years ago

Again.... you thinking/stating anything Trump did was in the name of patriotism is hogwash.

I've watched your obfuscation on steroids approach with others here on NT.  You reject truths, and facts while trying to sell your far right talking points as reality.  Back on ignore you go!

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
6.5.12  Nerm_L  replied to  JohnRussell @6.5.9    4 years ago
It's bad for humanity, it's bad for decency. 

So, the Republican Party of Nixon, Ford, Reagan, G.H.W. Bush, and G.W. Bush stood for humanity and decency?  Then why were Democrats so opposed to that Republican Party?

Followers of Trumpism have absolutely refused to hold Trump responsible for his mountainous amount of lies and corruption.  That is because they approve of the ideology - white grievance, white nationalism, christian theocracy, and the lure of the ideology is stronger than the desire to hold him to account. 

Maybe because it's not really about Trump.  

Democrats want Trump to carry them piggy-back through the midterm election.  Democrats need Trump in the spotlight as a bogeyman.  But Trump has been blocked and banned; Trump isn't in the news.  Democrats are trying to keep Trump in the news but other events are attracting more attention.

Democrats invested an enormous amount of effort into dividing the country.  How are Democrats going to unite the country now?  Does Joe Biden's two-state solution apply to the United States as well?

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
6.5.13  TᵢG  replied to  Nerm_L @6.5.12    4 years ago
Democrats need Trump in the spotlight as a bogeyman.

They could not do that if the Rs would detach from Trump and find a new leader.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Expert
6.5.14  Tessylo  replied to  FLYNAVY1 @6.5.11    4 years ago
Again.... you thinking/stating anything Trump did was in the name of patriotism is hogwash. I've watched your obfuscation on steroids approach with others here on NT.  You reject truths, and facts while trying to sell your far right talking points as reality.  Back on ignore you go!

jrSmiley_81_smiley_image.gif jrSmiley_81_smiley_image.gif jrSmiley_81_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
6.6  evilone  replied to  Nerm_L @6    4 years ago
Would someone, please, explain why that is a bad thing. 

The Trumpublican tent is a very small one. Small tent parties doesn't usually do very well electorally. I'm not claiming anything is certain yet, but we'll all have a better idea where the party is headed around the middle of the 2024 primaries. 

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
6.6.1  Greg Jones  replied to  evilone @6.6    4 years ago

I suspect you will be quite surprised

 
 
 
Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom
Professor Guide
7  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom    4 years ago

Robert Gates told CBS on Sunday that traditional GOP values were "hard to find these days."

After the last 5 years, who can remember what 'traditional GOP values' were in the first place?

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
7.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom @7    4 years ago

I can recall one....personal responsibility

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Expert
7.1.1  Tessylo  replied to  Trout Giggles @7.1    4 years ago

They seem to have forgotten that one!  Along with everything else.  

 
 
 
FLYNAVY1
Professor Participates
7.2  seeder  FLYNAVY1  replied to  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom @7    4 years ago

I can recall a second one...... Belief in law and order.

Look no further than them running from what happened during the Capitol riots of 6JAN21...

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Expert
7.2.1  Tessylo  replied to  FLYNAVY1 @7.2    4 years ago

They've been running pretty hard from that since 1/6/2021 - they're still catching all the traitors now.  

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
8  TᵢG    4 years ago

I agree, the R party has lost its way.   They initially rejected the Trump parasite but eventually succumbed to its infection.   Why they do not take steps to rid themselves of this parasite remains a mystery (to me).   There are other human beings who can support the so-called 'Trump Platform' since what Trump pursued (by words at least) is standard R party policy.   So why continue with a proven narcissist and pathological liar who, for the first time in history, as a sitting PotUS, irresponsibly exploited the influential power of his office to engage in a post-election con-job in an attempt to steal an election?

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
8.1  JohnRussell  replied to  TᵢG @8    4 years ago
I agree, the R party has lost its way.   They initially rejected the Trump parasite but eventually succumbed to its infection.  

Not true, at least not with Republican voters. Polling showed Trump was a viable contender for the Republican nomination just a few weeks after he announced his candidacy in the summer of 2015. 

Donald Trump Tops 30% in CNN/ORC poll | CNN Politics

Sep 10, 2015  · Donald Trump has become the first  GOP presidential  candidate to top 30% support in the race for the  Republican  nomination, according to a new CNN/ORC   Poll .

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
8.1.1  TᵢG  replied to  JohnRussell @8.1    4 years ago
Not true, at least not with Republican voters.

The R party leadership did not support Trump.   The reason it acquiesced is because the R voters insisted on Trump.

I am curious, why did you zero in on this nuance and declare 'Not True'?   Clearly you agree with my comment and you realize that the R party leadership did not want Trump to be their nominee. 

Obviously the R electorate supported Trump since he did indeed become the nominee and eventually won the presidency.

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
8.1.2  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  JohnRussell @8.1    4 years ago

He never got much higher than 30% in four years either.

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
9  Ender    4 years ago
But Gates said he didn't think many Republican lawmakers actually thought the 2020 election was fraudulent, calling the claim "political gaming rather than a real conviction."

So he is saying some republicans think their constituents are idiots and are using the lie to snowjob them.

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
10  Paula Bartholomew    4 years ago

The US has gone from being a super power to being a super laughing stock since 2016.

 
 
 
bbl-1
Professor Quiet
12  bbl-1    4 years ago

None of the eight presidents Gates served under had an adoration, need or personal fear of what a Russian leader might know about him.

 
 

Who is online

Thomas


53 visitors