Still in the game: Will Durham's report throw a slow curveball at key political players? | TheHill
Category: News & Politics
Via: vic-eldred • 5 years ago • 51 commentsBy: Jonathan Turley (TheHill)
Texas Rangers infielder Brock Holt went to the mound this week and threw an eephus — a high-arching, off-speed pitch — in a game against the Oakland Athletics. It is believed to be the slowest pitch recorded in MLB history, and A's batter Josh Harrison stood in disbelief as the 31 mph pitch was called a strike. Harrison just laughed in amazement.
Pirates outfielder Maurice Van Robays coined the term in the 1946 All-Star Game, explaining, "Eephus ain't nothing, and that's a nothing pitch." But as Holt demonstrated, sometimes a "nothing" slow pitch can amount to a great deal.
That is equally true about the occasional criminal eephus that takes everyone by surprise. For example, U.S. Attorney John Durham ’s investigation has been slow in coming, but on Friday, a report surfaced that he is pitching evidence to a grand jury in an investigation started back in May 2019. The Durham investigation is now longer in duration than former special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation, and many people long forgot that Durham — made a special counsel at the end of the Trump administration — was even still in the game.
The report in The Wall Street Journal said Durham is presenting evidence against FBI agents and possibly others in the use of false information or tips at the start of the Russia investigation in 2016. Those "others" could include a virtual who's who of Washington politics, and even if they are not indicted, Durham could implicate some of the most powerful figures in politics in his final report, expected in the coming months.
Even for those of us who followed and wrote on the Russia investigation for five years, much has been revealed in the last year. It was disclosed in October, for instance, that President Obama was briefed by his CIA director, John Brennan , on July 28, 2016, on intelligence suggesting that Hillary Clinton planned to tie then-candidate Donald Trump to Russia as “a means of distracting the public from her use of a private email server.” The date was significant because the Russia investigation was initiated July 31, 2016 , just three days later.
Throughout the campaign, the Clinton campaign denied any involvement in the creation of the so-called Steele dossier’s allegations of Trump-Russia connections. However, weeks after the election, journalists discovered that the Clinton campaign hid payments for the dossier made to a research firm, Fusion GPS, as “legal fees” among the $5.6 million paid to the campaign’s law firm. New York Times reporter Ken Vogel said at the time that Clinton lawyer Marc Elias, with the law firm of Perkins Coie, denied involvement in the anti-Trump dossier. When Vogel tried to report the story, he said, Elias “ pushed back vigorously, saying ‘You (or your sources) are wrong .’” Times reporter Maggie Haberman declared, “ Folks involved in funding this lied about it, and with sanctimony, for a year .”
It was not just reporters who asked the Clinton campaign about its role in the Steele dossier. John Podesta, Clinton's campaign chairman, was questioned by Congress and denied categorically any contractual agreement with Fusion GPS. Sitting beside him was Elias, who reportedly said nothing to correct the misleading information given to Congress.
It was later revealed that American intelligence viewed Steele as unreliable and believed his dossier was used by Russian intelligence to plant disinformation. Later reports show that Steele shopped the information to any reporters who would listen before the election and that there was an effort to get the information to trusted figures in the Justice Department.
This cross-pollination between the campaign and the Justice Department was evident in the strange role of Bruce Ohr, a senior Justice official who was later demoted for concealing his meetings with people pushing the Steele dossier; his wife, Nellie Ohr, worked for Fusion GPS as a researcher on Trump's purported connections to Russia. Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz subsequently found that Bruce Ohr acted improperly and committed "consequential errors in judgment."
Others are reported in some media accounts to be in Durham's crosshairs, including an analyst at the liberal Brookings Institution, Igor Danchenko, who was a source for part of the dossier and the subject of a Durham subpoena. Danchenko has been linked to a source viewed by American intelligence as a conduit for Russian disinformation and reportedly was investigated as a possible national security threat, according to at least one news report.
Durham also is reportedly looking into information concerning Alfa Bank, a privately owned commercial bank in Russia. That information led to possible access to the Trump campaign server. The Alfa Bank controversy is likely to make a number of powerful people particularly uneasy. Clinton campaign-linked figures such as Fusion GPS co-founder Glenn Simpson allegedly pushed the debunked claim that the Trump campaign had a server linked directly to the bank, which in turn was linked to Vladimir Putin and his cronies. The Alfa Bank conspiracy reportedly was pitched to the Justice Department, including in contacts with Bruce Ohr.
For many individuals, the statute of limitations may have passed on any alleged crimes. But the truth brought to light in any final report could result a public indictment of sorts.
Attorney General Merrick Garland may face some pressure to refuse to reauthorize a continuation of the Durham investigation, but he is likely to continue that support. After all, the Mueller investigation and various damaging investigations targeting Trump officials were approved and protected by his predecessor, William Barr .
The final fight may be over the report itself. Many in Congress and the media may not want it to see the light of day since it is likely to be an indictment not just of the FBI but of the establishment and an enabling media. Yet these same figures demanded "full transparency" over the Mueller report, including secret grand jury material barred from release under federal law. Even in a city that lives on political spin, reversing that narrative to demand secrecy or major redactions may be difficult to achieve in front of an increasingly distrustful public.
Thus, John Durham may be the slowest pitcher of all major league federal prosecutors — but a wide array of powerful people are afraid they may be called out at the plate by what he is about to let fly.
Jonathan Turley is the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University.
Tags
Who is online
347 visitors

Watch for it. It's coming....

pffft, that old POS will be pushing up daisies before he ever participates in another lengthy federal trial.
Oh no, not an avatar change ...
Jonathan Turley's fall from being a reasonable if terminally boring "legal expert" to being a shill for right wing fantasies has been breathtaking over the past few years.
No one will be indicted for anything, least of all for unfairly targeting Donald Trump's campaign for investigation in 2016.
Oh yes they will, wishing won't make this scandal go away..
What scandal? The FBI has to treat all leads and reports of irregularities equally.
They have to make a decision based on evidence available at the time.
To hold them to a Monday morning Quarterback's standard many years later
is the ultimate damned if you do, damned if you don't scenario.
Durham is basically trying to get the Grand Jury to bring criminal charges against FBI agents for doing their jobs.
Does this remind you of the Grand Jury that would not indict Andrew McCabe?
It should and the results should be the same, NO witch hunts.
When they know those leads and reports are full of shit they are supposed to drop them. Not use them to launch a fishing expedition against a political opponent.
The evidence at the time was the Steele dossier was full of shit; and they knew it.
It is called being held responsible for potential crimes they committed. That whole equal under the law thing; which Democrats oppose now in our new two tier justice system.
Fuck them all. They knew what they were doing when they were doing it. Funny how they sat on the Hunter Biden hard drives- which had far more incriminating evidence.
For breaking the damn law! Get that through your thick TDS driven heads!
Where the hell is McGabe now? No longer working in government; and no chance of ever getting a job in it again. CNN hired his TDS driven ass. They deserve each other.
The whole damn Mueller investigation was a fucking witch hunt; but TDS sufferers had no damn problem with it! Screw them all. If they are innocent they will be found so; but many will lose their jobs w/o a golden parachute as it should be!
Oh, and what charges were brought against McGabe? The Grand Jury didn't give a decision. Which is another thing you got wrong.
McGabe did his damn job so well he was fired over it. No charges were filed against him. Again our two tier justice system playing itself out.
I said they failed to indict. What did I get wrong? Who said it's so easy to indict that even a ham sandwich could be indicted?
Rudy G?
Do you have any thing NEWER than a reactionary blog article from 2 years ago?
The matter is now headed to mediation.
Victory for McCabe seems like a forgone conclusion now.
All partisan talking points voted up by the regulars
Congratulations.
Fuck the asshole Garland. He is a leftwing POS. Of course he is negotiating with the leftist tool McGabe.
The asshole deserved to be fired and prosecuted. All you are pointing out is that our two tier justice system is still in full damn affect!
But that is OK with the left; it is what they want for this country.
Ah, none of your regulars coming around? I am sure if you ask nicely they will give you some mercy votes.
Not in DC when it involves Trump.
Stated in your usual eloquence I see.
BTW the asshole, LW POS Garland is the person who is going to keep Trump from being prosecuted, at least for 01/06.
good article by that other worthless POS Jeffrey Toobin.
Read it, it might improve your mood.
Mr. Durham has been examining potential criminal charges against several lower-level Federal Bureau of Investigation employees, and people who aren’t in government,
Big whoop.
another lackluster participant in the trumpster kitchen sink tossing contest...
Trump may demand to be re-instated as president and the clock rewound to 2017.