Former Republicans and Democrats form new third U.S. political party | Reuters
Category: News & Politics
Via: john-russell • 2 years ago • 31 commentsBy: Tim Reid (Reuters)
Dozens of former Republican and Democratic officials announced on Wednesday a new national political third party to appeal to millions of voters they say are dismayed with what they see as America's dysfunctional two-party system.
By Tim Reid4 minute read
LOS ANGELES, July 27 (Reuters) - Dozens of former Republican and Democratic officials announced on Wednesday a new national political third party to appeal to millions of voters they say are dismayed with what they see as America's dysfunctional two-party system.
The new party, called Forward and whose creation was first reported by Reuters, will initially be co-chaired by former Democratic presidential candidate Andrew Yang and Christine Todd Whitman, the former Republican governor of New Jersey. They hope the party will become a viable alternative to the Republican and Democratic parties that dominate U.S. politics, founding members told Reuters.
Party leaders will hold a series of events in two dozen cities this autumn to roll out its platform and attract support. They will host an official launch in Houston on Sept. 24 and the party's first national convention in a major U.S. city next summer.
The new party is being formed by a merger of three political groups that have emerged in recent years as a reaction to America's increasingly polarized and gridlocked political system. The leaders cited a Gallup poll last year showing a record two-thirds of Americans believe a third party is needed.
The merger involves the Renew America Movement, formed in 2021 by dozens of former officials in the Republican administrations …
It seems like Andrew Yang will do whatever he can to keep himself semi-relevant.
To be filed under TRIVIA.
I'm going to disagree with you. I think we need a viable third party.
Agreed. Here's to hoping they don't become more of the same old same old.
They have some really good people already involved. That is different.
I dont have a problem with a third party, other than we are a two party country where third parties have a bleak record.
Eventually it could be part of the mainstream but in the beginning it will end up helping one side or the other by being a spoiler.
If not now, when ? A higher percentage of Americans identify as Independent than Dem or Rep.
The time is ripe.
I will keep an eye on them. One thing, though. Not a fan of Yang's universal income. It would be better to take that money and use it to create more jobs, in my opinion. A universal income seems like financial fentanyl to me.
Indeed but I think we will be forced into measures similar to this. Technology (AI) is eliminating higher level jobs. We keep growing the population while reducing available jobs. That is a disaster waiting to happen.
I generally agree. I'm not against developing a limited AI but I think it should be very narrowly employed. As it is now, the goal isn't for the betterment of mankind but, rather, for increased profit. Humans need purpose and the way AI is being pursued, that purpose is being eliminated.
But we both know that profit is going to prevail.
Yes! Dragged in voluntarily or kicking and screaming. This mildly reminds me of NETFLIX - forced to keep its spot, deal with its losses, by succeeding price hikes. Some so immediate that patrons are told several increases within month of each other. Competition can be a beast! And if you are not moving, . . . you are demanding some other company out to 'you.'
As there are 1 percenters 'trapped' in generational wealth, there are the 99 percenters 'trapped' in poverty and/or mediocrity. We see that in stark relief in our present world. The 99 percent need all the assists that can be provided them. So what if it is a 'hand-up'? Keep this in mind, early 1900's gave us the progressive tax. It was only then that the poor could even appear in public to look like 'somebody' of the gentle class. Able to afford some or all of their necessities and have a small disposable income to boot. Elsewise, the rank and file looked and smelled the part of the wretchedly and desperate underclass.
If 99% of us were trapped in poverty, the gaming industry, entertainment, and recreation industries, even the hospitality industry wouldn't be coming back strong. I see delivery service trucks all day long in my neighborhood and no one here takes care of their own lawn.
Me, too
The fact we're talking about people (plural) is different already.
I'm very interested.
Honestly, the two-parties have no one to blame but themselves for all their silly, ridiculous, congressional "cat-fighting." No one ASKED the two-parties to get stuck on each other! No one has the time or inclination to care what started it. In that regard, I commend any group that can get inbetweens these 'fools' in D.C.
And yes, I do understand and accept that there will be adjustments to be had/made. But, again, the two-parties need a big pail of cold water thrown in both their faces! Maybe they can snap out of it, before aiding or being complicit in bring about a SECOND civil war!
I think that this has been a long time coming. We need a third party. We are the only western nation with only 2 choices, which is really no choice at all.
"Open Sesame!" Just like that Senator Joe Manchin and maybe Senator Sinema are interesting again. Just. In. The. Nick. Of. Time??? Is it a time for reflection for these two? The dire outlook for the mid-terms? A realization that blinko-bingo they could not be the main players in the political cesspool? That said, a third political party won't be an easy fit. It will take some serious effort-especially if the two parties relent.
This will go the way of every third party.
If they are lucky they will have as much success as Perot's third party- which vanished from existence as members abided by preset party term limits.
It will take an earth mover to get anyone to stop voting for the "lesser of two evils".
I believe the Reform Party of the United States still exists and has nominated candidates for presidential elections (among others) including the 2020 election. Of course since Ross Perot, their candidates have not managed to even pull in 1% of the ballots. While the two parties hold a hard lock on the debate stage by locking out all other parties, this new third party will make noise but not make much difference in the elections.
Is that wishful thinking?
Don't you think it's time?
Well now there's a new one: "The lesser of Three evils." Oppo research will become wonderfully inflated, expensive and profitable, or drenched in unmanageable deepening confusion!
Its a good concept but who's the target audience? There's really no interest group that isn't already within the two parties respective umbrellas right now, and those people who politically active in our system tend to be zealots who view people who disagree with them as domestic terrorists. I'm curious what platform they can create that will attract the tiny amount of actual independents who exist that won't cause them to desert over some pet issue.
Well, whatever the platform turns out to be, it will need to appeal to as much of the center as possible in order to have a chance. I really would like to see a third party. I think I'd actually like to see something along the lines of a parliamentary system. Less all or nothing.
It would be nice if the new party was fiscally sane and agreed to a balanced budget if ever elected.
Republicans and Democrats have shown repeatedly that the national debt is really no concern to them.
In principle I am entirely in favor of a third choice. In reality, it depends upon the nature of the party. Regardless, if a third party can gain sufficient traction to be viable, that is good in and of itself because it would logically offer something distinct from the other parties.
How about this, a political party that cares about border security, national debt, climate, environment, economy, defense, education, innovation, universal health care (public standards, private execution), and renewable energy (for starters)?
Madman!!!
I know, crazy shit.
WTH? We have a plethora of parties now. Everyone has a choice to go the way of those "others". They just have a message problem. And I think this one, although a valiant thought, will try to garner the votes of indies but will be hard pressed to sway any Dem/GOP votes of any consequence.