Border Patrol nab illegal immigrant with conviction for raping child under age of 4 | Fox News

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  texan1211  •  one month ago  •  84 comments

By:   Adam Shaw (Fox News)

Border Patrol nab illegal immigrant with conviction for raping child under age of 4 | Fox News
Border Patrol agents arrested an illegal immigrant with prior convictions including for possession of a controlled substance and sex with a child three years or younger.

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



Border Patrol agents have arrested an illegal immigrant with a number of prior conviction, including raping a child under the age of four - the latest child sex offender to be arrested trying to enter the United States.

Agents in Yuma, Arizona arrested Miguel Vargas Mendoza, a 33-year-old Mexican national on Tuesday. Chief Patrol Agent Chris Clem said that Mendoza had prior convictions for possession of a controlled substance and marijuana for sale, sex with a child three years or younger and willful cruelty to a child.

The incident marks the latest example of the kind of criminal illegal immigrants who are seeking to enter the United States via the southern border -- where agents have been overwhelmed with a historic influx of migrants that has had the border at crisis levels for well over a year.

Border Patrol agents have caught an illegal immigrant with multiple prior convictions in Yuma, Arizona.

So far this fiscal year Border Patrol have made 9,381 arrests of criminal migrants, among the more than two million migrants who have crossed into the U.S. -- although that does not include the over 500,000 who have successfully evaded agents.

Among those encountered include 283 convictions for sexual offenses, compared to 488 in all of FY 2021 and 156 in FY 2020.

Earlier this month agents in Texas apprehended four sex offenders -- including a Guatemalan national who had previously been arrested and charged with lewd and lascivious acts with a child under 14 by force and was sentenced to 22 years in prison.

Agents also picked a Salvadoran national who had been convicted for indecent exposure with a child in Houston in 2016, a crime for which he was sentenced to 10 years probation.

Agents in Brownsville, Texas arrested a 32-year-old Mexican national who had a prior conviction of cruelty towards a child and transmission of child pornography in Florida. Officials nabbed a Mexican illegal alien last week who had a prior arrest for sexual assault of a child under 11 in South Carolina.

ICE recently announced that a Mexican illegal immigrant who entered the U.S. earlier this year has been convicted of possessing child pornography.

Christian Munoz De La Rosa admitted to being part of a group of illegal immigrants caught near Carrizo Springs, Texas, in June. When he was picked up, authorities examined his phones and discovered the illegal images.

The phone contained 116 images of children, some involving children as young as 3.

The Biden administration is focusing on root causes of migration and has claimed that the border is secure, although FBI Director Christopher Wray recently testified that the border presents "significant security issues."

"I have been to ports of entry, including not that long ago, with [Customs and Border Protection] officers walking me through it, so I could really see firsthand what they're up against, and all I can say is, boy, they've got a heck of a challenge and I admire their grit and determination to get the job done, but it's a daunting one," he told lawmakers.

Adam Shaw is a politics reporter for Fox News Digital, with a focus on immigration. He can be reached at adam.shaw2@fox.com or on Twitter: @AdamShawNY


Article is LOCKED by author/seeder
[]
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1  seeder  Texan1211    one month ago

I think that they are NOT sending us their best.

Maybe Biden can get a handle on it sometime or other.

/s

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.1  Vic Eldred  replied to  Texan1211 @1    one month ago

We just broke an all time record: 2 Million encounters!

"The number of migrant encounters at the  southern border  this fiscal year has now exceeded two million, sources tell Fox News — a number that marks a new record, as well as a glaring sign of the enormous and ongoing crisis facing agents, officials and communities at the border."

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.1.1  seeder  Texan1211  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.1    one month ago

But Biden says the border is secure!

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Participates
1.1.2  arkpdx  replied to  Texan1211 @1.1.1    one month ago

But biden's an ass. 

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.1.3  seeder  Texan1211  replied to  arkpdx @1.1.2    one month ago

Yeah, and we are stuck with him for a while longer.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
1.2  Ozzwald  replied to  Texan1211 @1    one month ago
I think that they are NOT sending us their best.

Who is sending them?

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.2.1  seeder  Texan1211  replied to  Ozzwald @1.2    one month ago
Who is sending them?

Figure it out if you are sincerely interested and not just trolling.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
1.2.2  Ozzwald  replied to  Texan1211 @1.2.1    one month ago
Figure it out if you are sincerely interested and not just trolling.

So no answer because you are just trolling again.  Got it.

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Participates
1.2.3  arkpdx  replied to  Ozzwald @1.2    one month ago

Who cares who's sending them. Just send them back. Any place that will take them except here is good enough. He'll send somewhere else that doesn't want them just get them out of here. 

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
1.2.4  Ozzwald  replied to  arkpdx @1.2.3    one month ago
Who cares who's sending them.

If you would bother reading the comment thread that you are commenting on, your would see that Texan1211 is very concerned with them.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.2.5  seeder  Texan1211  replied to  Ozzwald @1.2.4    one month ago
your would see that Texan1211 is very concerned with them.

Only if he imagined that someone writing "I think that they are NOT sending us their best." demonstrates great concern rather than merely noting the fucking obvious.

Personally, I know he is way too smart to try something so shady and stupid.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
1.2.6  Ozzwald  replied to  Texan1211 @1.2.5    one month ago
Only if he imagined that someone writing "I think that they are NOT sending us their best." demonstrates great concern rather than merely noting the fucking obvious.

Ahhh, you're back.  Once again, who is "they"?  Who specifically is sending them?

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
1.2.7  bugsy  replied to  Ozzwald @1.2    one month ago
Who is sending them?

How many have you taken into your home?

 
 
 
afrayedknot
Freshman Quiet
1.2.8  afrayedknot  replied to  bugsy @1.2.7    one month ago

How many are you willing to shoot? An equally silly proposition in ignoring the very real problem.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
1.2.9  bugsy  replied to  afrayedknot @1.2.8    one month ago
How many are you willing to shoot?

Every one that tries to cross my threshold without permission.

"An equally silly proposition in ignoring the very real problem"

Besides illegal alien parasites, what do you believe is the "very real problem"?

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Participates
1.2.10  arkpdx  replied to  afrayedknot @1.2.8    one month ago
How many are you willing to shoot? 

How many of them are crossing the border illegally. They shoot invaders don't they?

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.2.11  seeder  Texan1211  replied to  Ozzwald @1.2.6    one month ago
Ahhh, you're back.  Once again, who is "they"?  Who specifically is sending them?

In the words of one of your heroines:

What difference – at this point, what difference does it make?" 
 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
1.2.12  Ozzwald  replied to  Texan1211 @1.2.11    one month ago
What difference – at this point, what difference does it make?"

Still trolling?  Too pitiful to even back up your own claim?

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
1.2.13  JBB  replied to  Ozzwald @1.2.12    one month ago

Nailed It!

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
2  seeder  Texan1211    one month ago
The Biden administration is focusing on root causes of migration and has claimed that the border is secure, although FBI Director Christopher Wray recently testified that the border presents "significant security issues."

Gee, Mr. Biden, how can the border be secure AND present significant security issues?

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Guide
3  Greg Jones    one month ago

Instead of the IRS harassing the poor and middle class citizens, maybe Bumbling Biden should hire 87,000 border agents

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
3.1  seeder  Texan1211  replied to  Greg Jones @3    one month ago
Instead of the IRS harassing the poor and middle class citizens, maybe Bumbling Biden should hire 87,000 border agents

I don't believe it will take 87,000 border agents to unlock gates that keep illegal aliens out.

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Participates
3.2  arkpdx  replied to  Greg Jones @3    one month ago

Absolutely.! I have been thinking the same thing which just goes to prove that great minds think alike!

Unfortunately Biden and the Democrats would rather terrorize the citizens of our country because they certainly don't want to inconvenience the illegal aliens invading the southern border 

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Participates
5  arkpdx    one month ago

Because of recent liberal policies they will probably let him go without bail and reduce any charges to misdemeanor for following too close. 

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Expert
6  Tacos!    one month ago

I’m gonna call for a collective deep breath and relax.

I’m glad they caught a bad guy, but if you’re trying to impress readers with the numbers, this story does a poor job. Here’s the problem in perspective using the numbers provided.

So far this fiscal year Border Patrol have made 9,381 arrests of criminal migrants, among the more than two million migrants who have crossed into the U.S. -- although that does not include the over 500,000 who have successfully evaded agents.

2 million - 500K = 1.5 million. Of those, 9,381 were criminals. 9381/1500000 = 0.006254. So we’re talking about six-tenths of 1%. 

Statistically, very few are sexual offenders. YTD, it’s 283. That’s 3% of criminal illegal aliens, and therefore 18 thousandths of 1% of the illegal immigrants. 

Roughly half of these people qualify as “criminal” merely because they are illegally re-entering the country.

Now I will always endorse seeking greater control of immigration. But people talk about this like it’s a national crisis and we’re being invaded by rapists. The same people won’t wear a mask if Covid only kills 2 or 3% of those who are infected.

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Participates
6.1  arkpdx  replied to  Tacos! @6    one month ago

One criminal alien is too many. A criminal alien pedophile/sex abuser is about ten too many. There is no justification for any of those illegal aliens to cross the border they all need to stay south of the border. The further south the better. 

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Expert
6.1.1  Tacos!  replied to  arkpdx @6.1    one month ago
One criminal alien is too many.

Totally agree. But you’re never going to get to zero.

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
6.1.2  Ronin2  replied to  Tacos! @6.1.1    one month ago
One criminal alien is too many.
Totally agree. But you’re never going to get to zero.

You have to try to stop them first. The Biden administration isn't even trying.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
6.1.3  Ozzwald  replied to  arkpdx @6.1    one month ago
One criminal alien is too many.

Only Americans should be criminals?  Is that actually what you are promoting?

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Participates
6.1.4  arkpdx  replied to  Ozzwald @6.1.3    one month ago

I didn't say that. But we do already have a surplus of American criminals. We have no need to have criminals from other countries adding to our problems. 

Why are you in favor of allowing alien criminals entry into the country?

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
6.1.5  seeder  Texan1211  replied to  Ozzwald @6.1.3    one month ago
Only Americans should be criminals?  Is that actually what you are promoting?

Why so obtuse?

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
6.1.6  Ozzwald  replied to  arkpdx @6.1.4    one month ago

Why are you in favor of allowing alien criminals entry into the country?

Where did I say that?

I am just fine with asylum seekers however, as are our laws.

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Participates
6.1.7  arkpdx  replied to  Ozzwald @6.1.6    one month ago
I am just fine with asylum seekers however, as are our laws 

The overwhelming majority if not all of those crossing or attempting to cross the border are not eligible for asylum. Being poor and or not able to find proper employment in their own country is not a reason offer them asylum. It also does not make them refugees. Trump's remain in Mexico policy was good and was working. It needs to be reinstated

 

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
6.1.8  Ozzwald  replied to  arkpdx @6.1.7    one month ago
The overwhelming majority if not all of those crossing or attempting to cross the border are not eligible for asylum.

Not yours to decide.  If they are trying to claim asylum, they have the right to do so, no matter the outcome.  That's THE LAW!!!

Being poor and or not able to find proper employment in their own country is not a reason offer them asylum.

Yet they still have the right, BY LAW, to apply.  And they are here LEGALLY during that application process.

Trump's remain in Mexico policy was good and was working.

And I am sure you approved of Trump's policy to kidnap the children, take them away from their parents, and lose them in the system.  After all, it's not like they are human beings, is it???     /sarc

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
6.1.9  bugsy  replied to  Ozzwald @6.1.8    one month ago
nd they are here LEGALLY during that application process

How many have you taken into your home, or are you one of those NIMBY liberals?

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Participates
6.1.10  arkpdx  replied to  Ozzwald @6.1.8    one month ago
And I am sure you approved of Trump's policy to kidnap the children, take them away from their parents,

I am surprised you don't like that program since it was just a continuation of a policy started by Obama. You are also aware that many if not most of those 'children" were either unaccompanied by either parent or were not in anyway related to the people they crossed the border with. 

Yet they still have the right, BY LAW, to apply. 

Never said it wasn't illegal for them to apply. The law does not say that they must be let into the country to go anywhere in the country the please only to ignore their court hearings and ignore their orders to leave the country when denied asylum status. 

 
 
 
afrayedknot
Freshman Quiet
6.1.11  afrayedknot  replied to  arkpdx @6.1.10    one month ago

“You are also aware that many if not most of those 'children" were either unaccompanied…”

Indeed.

And what does that tell you about the desperation those parents felt?

And more importantly, what does that tell you about the callousness of those that ignore those innocents situation to score an inhumane political point? 

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Participates
6.1.12  arkpdx  replied to  afrayedknot @6.1.11    one month ago
 what does that tell you about the desperation those parents felt? 

How is their desperation my problem ?

 
 
 
afrayedknot
Freshman Quiet
6.1.13  afrayedknot  replied to  arkpdx @6.1.12    one month ago

Respectfully, how is the immigration problem, and it is a problem, affecting you personally…not politically, but in an existential manner? A serious question that should require an honest answer from everyone, lest the vitriol keep us from communally addressing the myriad problems facing us. 

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Freshman Principal
6.1.14  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  afrayedknot @6.1.13    one month ago
and it is a problem

Why do you think it's a problem?

 
 
 
afrayedknot
Freshman Quiet
6.1.15  afrayedknot  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @6.1.14    one month ago

“Why do you think it's a problem?”

Good question.

Because it has been ignored since Eisenhower and has become nothing but political fodder since. The money pissed away could have and should have gone to building the judiciary system to adjudicate the cases in a timely fashion, to provide humane living conditions for all those awaiting trial, and to invest in foreign relations to at least understand why the continual influx of would-be immigrants. Basically…open our eyes and shut our mouths. 

Just my opinion, and hopefully have at the very least answered your question. 

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Freshman Principal
6.1.16  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  afrayedknot @6.1.15    one month ago
Because it has been ignored since Eisenhower

Didn't care for the  1986 Immigration Reform and Control Act?

The money pissed away could have and should have gone to building the judiciary system to adjudicate the cases in a timely fashion, to provide humane living conditions for all those awaiting trial, and to invest in foreign relations to at least understand why the continual influx of would-be immigrants.

So you see it as more of a problem of caring for and adjudicating those that arrive illegibly or claiming asylum vs what is an immigration system that looks worldwide for improving the country?

 
 
 
afrayedknot
Freshman Quiet
6.1.17  afrayedknot  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @6.1.16    one month ago

“…caring for and adjudicating those that arrive illegibly or claiming asylum…”

I do.

I would, however, change ‘claiming’ asylum to seeking asylum and thusly, provide all that is required to humanely address those requests…a rather uniquely American tenet that has, of course, become politicized, weaponized…conveniently forgetting we are all descendants of immigrants, ‘illegibly’ or not. 

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Freshman Principal
6.1.18  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  afrayedknot @6.1.17    one month ago

So reduce World wide immigration to favor those geographically closer.

 
 
 
afrayedknot
Freshman Quiet
6.1.19  afrayedknot  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @6.1.18    one month ago

“…to favor those geographically closer.”

C’mon, wry. What, where and why the the conflict? You know, I know, everyone knows it is the Southern border. I’ve offered up my opinions already, so unless you have something to add, feel free to continue with the faux Socratic shenanigans. 

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Freshman Principal
6.1.20  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  afrayedknot @6.1.19    one month ago
You know, I know, everyone knows it is the Southern border.

Yes, assuming you agree that there is a finite number of immigrants that we should admit per year, I asked if you want to essentially reach that number with those that can walk here to the exclusion of others around the world.

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Participates
6.1.21  arkpdx  replied to  afrayedknot @6.1.13    one month ago

Why does it have to affect me personally? I don't like people that have no respect for our laws and think they can just ignore them. 

You probably don't want to know what I would do about the drug cartels either. It involve F-35s, B-2s and MI Abrams tanks

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
6.1.22  Ozzwald  replied to  arkpdx @6.1.10    one month ago
I am surprised you don't like that program since it was just a continuation of a policy started by Obama.

That has been debunked over and over.

You are also aware that many if not most of those 'children" were either unaccompanied by either parent or were not in anyway related to the people they crossed the border with. 

Are aware that the ones kidnapped and separated from their parents were NOT unaccompanied?  You're the one adding on the other children in this discussion.

The law does not say that they must be let into the country to go anywhere in the country the please only to ignore their court hearings and ignore their orders to leave the country when denied asylum status.

Are you planning on shipping our judges and courts out to Mexico?  That would be a stupid idea, so they would HAVE TO enter the country.

 
 
 
charger 383
Professor Quiet
6.1.23  charger 383  replied to  arkpdx @6.1.12    one month ago

It is not the problem of the US Citizens and taxpayers

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
6.1.24  Tessylo  replied to  charger 383 @6.1.23    one month ago

Yeah, can't be having all those feral cats (AKA your fellow human beings) here now can we?

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
6.1.25  seeder  Texan1211  replied to  Tessylo @6.1.24    one month ago
Yeah, can't be having all those feral cats (AKA your fellow human beings) here now can we?

Not illegally, no, we shouldn't be tolerating and cheering that crap on.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
6.1.26  Tessylo  replied to  Tessylo @6.1.24    one month ago

So no empathy or compassion whatsoever for your fellow human beings, I see.

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Participates
6.1.27  arkpdx  replied to  Tessylo @6.1.26    one month ago

I don't care. 

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
6.1.28  seeder  Texan1211  replied to  Tessylo @6.1.26    one month ago
So no empathy or compassion whatsoever for your fellow human beings, I see.

That seems an odd thing to admit to publicly about yourself.

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Freshman Principal
6.1.29  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Tessylo @6.1.26    one month ago
So no empathy or compassion whatsoever for your fellow human beings, I see.

So unlike the empathy and compassion that you express daily on these pages.

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Principal
6.1.30  Split Personality  replied to  Ronin2 @6.1.2    one month ago

The article indicates otherwise.

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Participates
6.2  arkpdx  replied to  Tacos! @6    one month ago
Roughly half of these people qualify as “criminal” merely because they are illegally re-entering the country.

So they already broke our laws once. Why should we let them do it again. They need to keep the hell out of my country. 

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Expert
6.2.1  Tacos!  replied to  arkpdx @6.2    one month ago
So they already broke our laws once.

Right, but any reasonable person should be able to distinguish between child-rapist and mere illegal border crosser. One is worth being very concerned about. The other, much less so.

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Participates
6.2.2  arkpdx  replied to  Tacos! @6.2.1    one month ago

Neither one belongs here and both should be arrested and sent back to where they came from. There is absolutely no excuse for anyone breaking the law even immigration laws

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Expert
6.2.3  Tacos!  replied to  arkpdx @6.2.2    one month ago

Yes, but do you understand you are being manipulated into panicking over it because “child rapist?”

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Participates
6.2.4  arkpdx  replied to  Tacos! @6.2.3    one month ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
6.2.5  Ronin2  replied to  Tacos! @6.2.3    one month ago

You do realize you are being manipulated into thinking those that cross the border illegally aren't causing hardships here?

  • They are putting a strain on our infrastructure and other resources.
  • They are removing aid that would be far better utilized to help our poor, homeless, and those that can't fend for themselves.
  • Are causing the US to increase it's carbon foot print well beyond what it should be.

That continuing and increasing those policies that ease illegal immigrants coming to this country only encourages more to come?

That the Democrats' dinner bell that was being rung loud and clear during their primaries in 2020; has turned into a dinner gong since Biden took office; and is now a never ending "Blue Light Special" at every inlet to the country (for those that remember Kmart).

You want to talk work VISA reform? OK, all for it. You want to talk about immigration reform? Maybe increasing the base numbers of those that can enter the country legally? Start with the precondition that all immigrants must apply for asylum at a US consulate and await processing outside the country. If they are under threat they can still go to a different country to wait. That all those that break our immigration laws are automatically expelled from the country with no future chance to enter under any conditions.

Illegal immigration is a real problem. It is past time it is addressed as such. 

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Freshman Principal
6.2.6  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Ronin2 @6.2.5    one month ago
Illegal immigration is a real problem. It is past time it is addressed as such

Wash DC's mayor agrees with you, after getting a few thousand visitors by bus, she asking to mobilize the National Guard, she wants federal facilities and more money to provide services.

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
PhD Principal
6.2.7  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @6.2.6    one month ago

And she got turned down again by the Pentagon LMAO

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
6.2.8  Ender  replied to  Ronin2 @6.2.5    one month ago
They are removing aid that would be far better utilized to help our poor, homeless, and those that can't fend for themselves.

Haha  So the idea is to spend more money and resources to stop these people instead of, you know, helping the poor....

Are causing the US to increase it's carbon foot print well beyond what it should be.

And here I thought you all think global warming is a hoax.

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Freshman Principal
6.2.9  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @6.2.7    one month ago

Perhaps they thought the optics would be counter productive.

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Participates
6.2.10  arkpdx  replied to  Ender @6.2.8    one month ago
So the idea is to spend more money and resources to stop these people instead of, you know, helping the poor....

 We have more than enough poor, homeless ( some of the homeless are that way by choice and can not be helped) an those that are unable to help themselves of our own. The last thing we need is for other countries poor homeless and helpless to come here. 

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Participates
6.2.11  arkpdx  replied to  Ender @6.2.8    one month ago
And here I thought you all think global warming is a hoax.

Global warming may not be a hoax and it probably is not. What is a hoax is that it is caused by man and the thought that man can do anything to stop it. The earth has been warming as a general rule since the last ice age. 

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
6.2.12  Ender  replied to  arkpdx @6.2.11    one month ago

Thinking people have not altered the planet is living in denial.

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Participates
6.2.13  arkpdx  replied to  Ender @6.2.12    one month ago

Thinking that people could haveMore effect than nature itself is pure idiocy 

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
6.2.14  Ender  replied to  arkpdx @6.2.13    one month ago

You actually think people cannot change nature? That deforestation does not have an impact? That paving over land with asphalt and concrete doesn't have any impact? That killing of animals doesn't have an impact? That polluting the oceans and overfishing doesn't have an impact?

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
6.2.15  Tessylo  replied to  Ronin2 @6.2.5    one month ago

PROVE IT

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
6.2.16  seeder  Texan1211  replied to  Tessylo @6.2.15    one month ago
PROVE IT

And exactly how does one go about 'proving' anything to you when you won't even read a link?

How do YOU propose anyone 'prove it' to you?

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
6.2.17  Tessylo  replied to  arkpdx @6.2.13    one month ago

What the huh?

Speaking of pure idiocy

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Participates
6.2.18  arkpdx  replied to  Ender @6.2.14    one month ago

I thought we were talking about climate change, you know, the rising temperatures. 

That deforestation does not have an impact?

In many areas there is more forested land than there was 200 years ago 

BTW It was around then that the earth had a mini ice age where summer essential did not exist for a few years and it even snowed in some parts of the northern hemisphere in July. 

That paving over land with asphalt and concrete doesn't have any impact?

There is so little by percentage that if it did have an impact it would be miniscule at best. Are you suggesting we go back to dirt cart paths and horse trails again?

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Participates
6.2.19  arkpdx  replied to  Tessylo @6.2.15    one month ago

jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif you are asking someone for proofjrSmiley_91_smiley_image.gif

When are you going to start providing  proof when you are asked jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Participates
6.2.20  arkpdx  replied to  Tessylo @6.2.17    one month ago
Speaking of pure idiocy

I wasn't calling you but since you have acknowledged your presence, please feel free to continue with your idiocy. Being that I am in the hospital awaiting heart surgery, I could use a good laugh and you never fail to provide those. 

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
6.2.21  Ender  replied to  arkpdx @6.2.18    one month ago

City centers generate heat.

The places you are talking about more trees are mainly on the East coast where logging has been in a decline.

It amazes me you think people can do anything they want and it will not change anything.

Look at maps now. There is nothing but lights emanating from most of the world at night.

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Participates
6.2.22  arkpdx  replied to  Ender @6.2.21    one month ago

Again are you proposing that we all go back to preindustrial days? How many people do you plan to kill off to reach your goal? How are you going to feed the rest? How will they be employed?

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
6.2.23  Ender  replied to  arkpdx @6.2.22    one month ago

I was born in the time I was born. I can still recognize damage when I see it.

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Participates
6.2.24  arkpdx  replied to  Ender @6.2.23    one month ago

You didn't answer my questions. 

And I was born when I was born. I am also smart enough to look back in history and see that the climate has been changing for at least 15000 years even when there were not enough people to make a difference. I am intelligent enough to know when there is an attempt to bamboozle me with false and manipulated data.  

 
 
 
afrayedknot
Freshman Quiet
6.2.25  afrayedknot  replied to  arkpdx @6.2.24    one month ago

“…I am also smart enough to look back in history and see that the climate has been changing for at least 15000 years…”

This is just too, too funny…or just so, so sad. 

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
6.3  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Tacos! @6    one month ago

If the feds give a estimated(?) figure of 500,000 that evade capture, it is probably safe to just go ahead and double that amount.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
PhD Guide
7  Jeremy Retired in NC    one month ago
Illegal Immigrant With Conviction For Raping Child Under Age Of 4

This is what the Democrats open border brings to the country.  

 
 

Who is online







dennissmith


29 visitors