╌>

Leftists Announce They No Longer Support Strong, Independent Women

  

Category:  Satire

Via:  gregtx  •  2 years ago  •  59 comments

Leftists Announce They No Longer Support Strong, Independent Women
ITALY — With the election of right-wing candidate Giorgia Meloni as Italy's first female Prime Minister, the Left has announced they no longer support strong, independent women.

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



ITALY — With the election of right-wing candidate Giorgia Meloni as Italy's first female Prime Minister, the Left has announced they no longer support strong, independent women.

"This is an absolute disaster. Maybe women do belong in the kitchen," said Italian Leftist Atlantic contributor Gianna Mozzarella. "If we had spent less time empowering women, maybe we could have stopped this far, far-right, right-wing fascist, far-extremist far, far, Nazi right-extremist right-winger from getting elected."

Experts in the EU, the World Economic Forum, and famed supervillain organization Spectre are warning that Meloni is extremely dangerous. "We can't overstate just how far, far, far-right extremist and fascist this extremist fascist far-right woman really is," said WEF Founder Klaus Schwab. "She is a danger to our glorious dream of a New World Order because she believes in things like family and the infinite worth of the individual — which, I must remind you — are things only fascists believe in."

At publishing time, Stacey Abrams stepped forward to announce that the Prime Minister position in Italy had been stolen from her.


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
GregTx
PhD Guide
1  seeder  GregTx    2 years ago

384

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
1.1  cjcold  replied to  GregTx @1    2 years ago

Except she's not a strong, independent woman.

She's a fascist which we don't support (at least I don't).

Another fascist so soon is the last thing Italy or the world needs.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
1.1.1  Tessylo  replied to  cjcold @1.1    2 years ago

Yet more unfunny, dumb ass, alleged satire.

Ho hum

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
1.1.2  Jack_TX  replied to  cjcold @1.1    2 years ago
She's a fascist

Why do you think that?

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Junior Expert
1.1.3  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Jack_TX @1.1.2    2 years ago

Maybe cjcold reads the NY Times.

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
1.1.4  Jack_TX  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @1.1.3    2 years ago
Maybe cjcold reads the NY Times.

I am seriously curious about this. 

We keep hearing this woman described as a fascist, but it's all coming from biased sources.  

So what has she done that actually makes her a fascist?

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2  Vic Eldred    2 years ago

The American left does not support them either.

 
 
 
squiggy
Junior Silent
2.1  squiggy  replied to  Vic Eldred @2    2 years ago

Do too. They want one in every window.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
2.2  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @2    2 years ago

"The American left does not support them either."

You're correct, we do not support fascists.  

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Junior Expert
2.2.1  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Tessylo @2.2    2 years ago
You're correct, we do not support fascists.  

Maybe not, but in the 1930's, fascists and Nazis loved FDR's New Deal.

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
2.2.2  Nerm_L  replied to  Tessylo @2.2    2 years ago
You're correct, we do not support fascists.  

So, women are fascists now?

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
2.2.3  Jack_TX  replied to  Nerm_L @2.2.2    2 years ago
So, women are fascists now?

Married women in their own homes?  Absolutely.  Try to defy one.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
2.2.4  Tessylo  replied to  Nerm_L @2.2.2    2 years ago

Clueless

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3  JohnRussell    2 years ago

New low for your satire in that    a) it makes very little sense    and     b) it isnt even slightly funny

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.1  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @3    2 years ago

Shouldn't satire be close to reality?

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
3.1.1  Texan1211  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.1    2 years ago
Shouldn't satire be close to reality?

It should, perhaps THAT is why so many here don't seem to get it. Hard to tell satire when you live in a bubble of your own making.

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
3.1.2  cjcold  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.1    2 years ago
Shouldn't satire be close to reality?

Satire should be funny and clever. This is neither.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3.1.3  Tessylo  replied to  cjcold @3.1.2    2 years ago
"Shouldn't satire be close to reality?"
"Satire should be funny and clever. This is neither."

BINGO!

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
3.2  Jack_TX  replied to  JohnRussell @3    2 years ago
New low for your satire in that    a) it makes very little sense    and     b) it isnt even slightly funny

Or....in the real world....it makes complete sense and is actually quite funny.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3.2.1  Tessylo  replied to  Jack_TX @3.2    2 years ago

It's moronic.  I guess that's what some find funny.

Morons.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
4  Texan1211    2 years ago

People unappreciative or uncomprehending of satire should skip all articles clearly labeled 'satire'.

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
4.1  cjcold  replied to  Texan1211 @4    2 years ago
clearly labeled 'satire'

Except it doesn't qualify as satire no matter the label.

Don't care for MTG or Lauren Boebert either. 

Man or strong woman I just don't care for fascists.

Some should look up what satire actually means.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
4.1.1  Texan1211  replied to  cjcold @4.1    2 years ago
Except it doesn't qualify as satire no matter the label.

Well, maybe it just identifies as satire.

Don't care for MTG or Lauren Boebert either. 

Mmmm....okay?

Man or strong woman I just don't care for fascists.

Great! Me neither!

Some should look up what satire actually means.

Some folks not only already know what it is, they have the capacity to appreciate it.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
4.1.2  Tessylo  replied to  cjcold @4.1    2 years ago
"clearly labeled 'satire'"
"Except it doesn't qualify as satire no matter the label.

Don't care for MTG or Lauren Boebert either. 

Man or strong woman I just don't care for fascists.

Some should look up what satire actually means."

We appreciate actual satire, like you said cj, funny and clever - you are spot on, as usual.  

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
4.2  Jack_TX  replied to  Texan1211 @4    2 years ago
People unappreciative or uncomprehending of satire should skip all articles clearly labeled 'satire'.

Nah.  You'd take away half the fun.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
4.2.1  Texan1211  replied to  Jack_TX @4.2    2 years ago
Nah.  You'd take away half the fun.

Well, you may be right there. It is rather amusing to see how fast the usual folks will race to declare satire is not satire.

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
4.2.2  Jack_TX  replied to  Texan1211 @4.2.1    2 years ago
It is rather amusing to see how fast the usual folks will race to declare satire is not satire.

I know, riiiiight??? 

It's like you almost count them in. 

3....2.....1..... *angry liberal appears to say "that's not funny".*

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
4.2.3  Texan1211  replied to  Jack_TX @4.2.2    2 years ago
It's like you almost count them in.  3....2.....1..... *angry liberal appears to say "that's not funny".*

And if one has been paying attention to any of the satirical articles, one can even predict which posters will be saying it and when.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5  JohnRussell    2 years ago

Not only do I comprehend satire , I am capable of writing satire and have done so numerous times here on NT.  

Today the political situation satirizes itself so written satire almost becomes redundant.  The far right trolls here wouldnt recognize satire if it gave them a kiss on the lips. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
5.1  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @5    2 years ago
The far right trolls here wouldnt recognize satire if it gave them a kiss on the lips.

And they claim that I make statements that pertain to members here!

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
5.1.1  Texan1211  replied to  Vic Eldred @5.1    2 years ago

It is pretty funny that there is only one claiming this isn't satire, isn't it?

Rather satirical considering the article, no?

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
5.1.2  Vic Eldred  replied to  Texan1211 @5.1.1    2 years ago

It's the witching hour. I will explain at some point.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
5.1.3  Texan1211  replied to  Vic Eldred @5.1.2    2 years ago
I will explain at some point.

I have seen what you are referring to! jrSmiley_13_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
5.1.4  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @5.1    2 years ago

You do.  All the time.

 
 
 
GregTx
PhD Guide
5.2  seeder  GregTx  replied to  JohnRussell @5    2 years ago

Was that meant to be a personal insult?

 
 
 
afrayedknot
Junior Quiet
5.2.1  afrayedknot  replied to  GregTx @5.2    2 years ago

[Deleted]

 
 
 
GregTx
PhD Guide
5.2.2  seeder  GregTx  replied to  afrayedknot @5.2.1    2 years ago

[Deleted] Thanks for your comment. Feel free to ignore my seeds.

 
 
 
squiggy
Junior Silent
5.2.3  squiggy  replied to  GregTx @5.2    2 years ago

Hey, whoa. She just called you 'sir'.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
5.2.4  Texan1211  replied to  GregTx @5.2.2    2 years ago
Feel free to ignore my seeds.

And miss out on a chance to insult you or to yap about Trump???

Never gonna happen!

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5.2.5  JohnRussell  replied to  afrayedknot @5.2.1    2 years ago

[Deleted]

 
 
 
GregTx
PhD Guide
5.2.6  seeder  GregTx  replied to  JohnRussell @5.2.5    2 years ago

Ain't that the fucking truth.....

 
 
 
squiggy
Junior Silent
5.2.7  squiggy  replied to  JohnRussell @5.2.5    2 years ago
so many dumbasses, so little time

Yea, but honestly, ya know what? You don't see any flags here. All the name-calling gets to stand, as opposed to what happens on the snowflake threads where the Flagger Force patrols.

 
 
 
GregTx
PhD Guide
5.2.8  seeder  GregTx  replied to  squiggy @5.2.7    2 years ago

Not always, sometimes the Doom Patrol steps in and sqashes everything in a thread.

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Junior Expert
5.2.9  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  JohnRussell @5.2.5    2 years ago
 so little time

So little time for what?

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
5.2.10  Sean Treacy  replied to  squiggy @5.2.7    2 years ago
You don't see any flags here.

Nobody criticized China, so its all good. 

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Junior Expert
5.2.11  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Sean Treacy @5.2.10    2 years ago
Nobody criticized China, so its all good. 

We have folks here that keep us clear that unlike the USA, China doesn't warrant any criticism.  

 
 
 
squiggy
Junior Silent
5.2.12  squiggy  replied to  GregTx @5.2.8    2 years ago

Oh yea, when the Command level sees too much fun…

 
 
 
squiggy
Junior Silent
5.2.13  squiggy  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @5.2.11    2 years ago

Bless his heart.

 
 
 
squiggy
Junior Silent
5.3  squiggy  replied to  JohnRussell @5    2 years ago
have done so numerous times

Just the other day you were praising Biden - these dicks don't know nothin.

 
 
 
squiggy
Junior Silent
5.4  squiggy  replied to  JohnRussell @5    2 years ago
a kiss on the lips. 

That's monkeypox you're flirting with.

 
 
 
GregTx
PhD Guide
5.4.1  seeder  GregTx  replied to  squiggy @5.4    2 years ago

jrSmiley_86_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Junior Expert
5.5  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  JohnRussell @5    2 years ago
I am capable of writing satire and have done so numerous times here on NT.

You're awesome JR, clearly awesome.

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
5.6  Jack_TX  replied to  JohnRussell @5    2 years ago
Not only do I comprehend satire , I am capable of writing satire and have done so numerous times here on NT.

Is this sentence an example?  

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
6  Jeremy Retired in NC    2 years ago

Wow.  The number of triggered leftists on this is kind of funny.  

 
 
 
George
Junior Expert
6.1  George  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @6    2 years ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
6.1.1  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  George @6.1    2 years ago

jrSmiley_13_smiley_image.gif Good point.

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
8  Ronin2    2 years ago
and famed supervillain organization Spectre

Couldn't they have used "Cobra!"? I had to actually look up what Spectre was. Never was a James Bond fan. Besides, leftists love to scream. "Cobra!" is something easy for them to remember; and the younger generation might stand a chance of knowing what it is. Some recent movies; and a cartoon series that was pretty much politically correct.

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
9  evilone    2 years ago

Isn't it sexist to say someone must support all women no matter what? I guess the MAGA Party can't call themselves the "Law and Order Party" or the "Pro-Life Party", but then again uber-partisans bring their hypocrisy with them everywhere.

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Junior Expert
9.1  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  evilone @9    2 years ago
Isn't it sexist to say someone must support all women no matter what?

Did someone say that?

I'll admit that I have my wife's back, even when she's wrong.

 
 

Who is online

George
Drakkonis
Vic Eldred
JBB
Jeremy Retired in NC
Sean Treacy
Ozzwald


109 visitors