Early voting for Georgia Senate runoff shattered records. Why? - ABC News
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
Early turnout in Georgia's fast approaching Senate runoff between Democrat Raphael Warnock and Republican Herschel Walker broke daily voting records three times since polls in all 159 counties opened last Monday.
Ahead of the Tuesday runoff, state officials have celebrated the historic feat. Elections experts contextualized those numbers as unusually high because of a voting period that was condensed by lawmakers as part of a larger overhaul of state elections.
"Georgia is a national leader in voter access and security," Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger said in a statement last week. "We are having historic levels of turnout and those who want to vote are voting- we believe this level of voter participation is excellent, and we'll keep working with counties to encourage them to open more Early Voting locations in the future."
MORE: Early voting soars in Georgia Senate runoff between Warnock, Walker
On Friday, the last day of early voting for the runoff, 352,953 people cast ballots, according to state elections data -- bringing the total number of early votes, either in person or absentee, to more than 1.8 million.
Friday's total beat out Tuesday's one-day record of 304,683, which was higher than early in-person voting in any other previous election year, according to the secretary of state's office, other than Monday's total of 303,665.
That pace eclipses previous records set by of voters who cast ballots in runoffs in 2018 and 2016, the state data shows.
How a 2021 law changed runoff timeline
A 2021 bill signed by Republican Gov. Brian Kemp shrank the timeframe for early voting in a runoff from a minimum of 17 days to a minimum of five. That was done as part of a sweeping law passed by the state's GOP-controlled legislature to change many aspects of how elections are conducted in Georgia.
Critics argued that some elements of the law amounted to voter suppression. Among those were Stacey Abrams (who unsuccessfully challenged Kemp in 2018 and 2022) and President Joe Biden.
"It remains true that turnout does not dispel voter suppression. Suppression is about barriers to access," Abrams said in October, pointing to Georgia's exacting requirements on voter registration and other measures.
Raffensperger and other Republicans have strongly pushed back on that charge, noting turnout in the state hasn't fallen off. They said the law was about election integrity.
"Abrams and President Biden lied to the people of Georgia and the country for political gain," Raffensperger said last year. "From day one, I said that Georgia's election law balanced security and access, and the facts have proved me right."
More recently, some observers and advocates highlighted long lines at early voting locations -- exacerbated, perhaps, by the level of interest. Gabriel Sterling, a top official in Raffensperger's office, wrote on Twitter that administration decisions like the number of polling places are made by each county.
Even with high levels of engagement, experts told ABC News that this year's totals are unlikely to rival early voting turnout levels from the 2021 Senate runoffs, when early voting was available for several weeks.
"Early in-person voting is popular, and it's relatively new," said University of Georgia political science professor Charles Bullock. "It's compressed into a single week as opposed to being spread over three weeks. So if you're going to do it, you got to move quickly."
Saturday voting a 'game changer'?
Bullock noted a jump in the numbers could also be attributed to a Democrat-led lawsuit that allowed some of the state's largest counties -- who overwhelmingly vote for Democrats -- to open polls last Saturday despite guidance from the secretary of state's office that would have prevented voting within two days of a holiday like Thanksgiving.
Once a judge permitted Saturday voting, those counties took advantage of it while traditionally GOP areas of the state chose not to. State data shows about 70,000 people voted early in person that day and more than three-quarters of the ballots were around Atlanta.
"Some of the Democratic counties got to jump on the Republican counties," Bullock said. "That could have really made the difference. It could be a game changer once we know what the results are."
Georgia Democratic senate candidate U.S. Sen. Raphael Warnock prepares to cast his ballot as he early votes, Nov. 27, 2022 in Atlanta.Justin Sullivan/Getty Images
Bucking the historical trend, even if some voters stay home
Historically, runoffs in Georgia have seen lower turnout than general elections. But 2021 and now 2022 were different: Two years ago, the amount of runoff votes was about 90% of the general election totals, Bullock said, while during the Senate runoffs in 2008 and 1982 it was about 57% of general election turnout.
Bullock said he expects this year to be less than turnout in 2021 but much higher than other showings.
"In the 2020 runoff election, turnout was more than we had voted in our general election this year -- I think [this cycle] would be somewhere above the 10% drop-off we saw two years ago," he said.
Though the race between Walker and Warnock won't determine control of the Senate, both Republicans and Democrats have cautioned voters not to underestimate the consequences of who holds the seat.
MORE: Early voting kicks off in Georgia's Senate runoff as legal challenges on access mount
Still, the relatively lower stakes compared to last year's runoffs -- which did decide the Senate majority -- could be keeping some from the polls, Bullock said.
"This isn't gonna control the Senate. And there's only one contest on the ballot," he said. "And I think also what basically happens is Republican identifiers who were conflicted about whether to vote for Herschel Walker ... may have overlooked his problems and voted for him because control of the Senate was important. I think those kinds of conflicted voters will simply sit this one out."
Alexander Robinson, a George Washington University student originally from Athens, Georgia, came back to the state over the weekend to canvass for Warnock, he told ABC News. He said that after knocking on countless doors, about half of the voters he spoke to were early voters, most of whom had cast their votes already for the incumbent.
"The fact that early voting numbers have been as high as they've been so far, the fact that there's not another popular Republican on the ticket leads me to believe that our chances are pretty good and I'm reasonably optimistic," he said at a Warnock campaign event on Saturday.
Senate nominee Herschel Walker talks with supporters during a rally, Nov. 21, 2022 in Milton, Georgia.Jessica Mcgowan/Getty Images
The demographic breakdown for the early turnout shows Black Georgians keeping pace with white voters, 31.9-55.1%, about equal to their overall shares of the population, and the most active age groups have been between 55-75 years old. Women have cast more ballots than men, 56-43.8%.
Bullock said that if the percentage of Black voters who turned out in the runoff remains above 30% through Election Day, that would be "pretty good" for Democrats.
"Warnock is gonna get 90% of that vote, maybe more," he said. "The electorate that's going to show up on Election Day is gonna be a much whiter electorate and a more Republican electorate."
Walker's team, meanwhile, made the argument last week that there was "great news" for him too, with hundreds of thousands of more votes from friendly areas of the state still to turn out.
At a Walker campaign event outside Saturday's Southeastern Conference championship game between Georgia and Louisiana State University, Briana Stopp from Canton, Georgia, said her son -- a first-time voter and college student -- had cast his ballot while he was home for Thanksgiving.
He braved a two-hour line to vote for "life and values" by picking Walker, his mom said.
"He texted me, 'Herschel better appreciate this,'" she said with a launch.
Stopp plans to vote on Tuesday: "That's my thing."
Tags
Who is online
65 visitors
I think the Democrats are creating votes out of Trump's farts.
Trumpers are not here to think
They're just here to shit and stink
While they're writing on these walls
They roll their shit in little balls
Then they bitch and moan, won't quit
Until they've eaten all their shit
When that is done they throw a fit
Sniff the air and savor it...
It's tella joke day? We both know the "anti-Trumpers don't think. That goes against the hive mentality. They might have an original thought that would lead them to the actual facts.
I'll give you a fact. The fact that a lot of people voted does not disprove there was an attempt to make it harder to vote.
I know you probably wont understand the point. Thats another fact.
Did you get that from one of Trump's farts? The fact you provided absolutely nothing to back up your statement tells me right off it's fiction.
The addition of the personal attack, tells me that you CAN'T back up your claim and are just flapping lips (nothing new there).
That never happened...its never been easier to vote
Looks like, once again, Democrat and liberal claims of voter suppression failed.
Yes, people will stand in long lines for hours in the freezing cold and pouring rain and the blazing sun when the gop makes voting harder!
The blue state of New Hampshire is the hardest state to vote in:
You cannot even give water to people in line to vote in Georgia!
Making voting harder and lines longer is voter suppression!
Just because it is not working doesn't make it less heinous.
Which states allow poll workers to approach voters in line and give them things?
I remember reading the the Dem city machine in NYC and Chicago used to give voters whiskey, do they still do that?
I think he's trying to say the voters in GA are too stupid to bring water.
That much spin, this is one DIZZY MF.
That's not true, it's an urban legend.
But then you can't try to influence somebody to vote the way the hive wants them to vote.
Fiction isn't working for you. Just stick to what you are good with - pointless memes.
[deleted]
No, the obvious lesson is that attempted voter suppression has backfired in Georgia because it pissed off and motivated people to vote early to insure they were not denied the vote.
Sure, and Hershel Walker is winning! Please do keep it up...
So the fact that there was no voter suppression proved that there was voter suppression.
That is the logic that has led to the last 2 presidents.
Two unqualified candidates but why did you change the subject?
Like Denton Baxter in Open Range.
By that dumbass logic attempting murder would not be a crime if it's unsuccessful!
Attempt was made and therefore that law was broken.
Apples and lug nuts
President Biden said: "What I'm worried about is how un-American this whole initiative is. It's sick. Deciding that you're going to end voting at five o'clock when working people are just getting off work."
The law allows counties to set voting hours anywhere between 7am and 7pm, as was the case previously.
Talk about your dumbass logic.
No, the older I get, the less that surprises me.
Why are people forced into long waits in interminable lines to vote when we can now safely, securely and easily do our taxes and our banking online?
China has stolen online personnel records from the US Office of Personnel Management, Marriott hotels, Anthem and credit card and other information from Equifax plus a great deal of manufacturing data.
Yet, no hackers have yet changed one vote!
If American trust their banks with their money and taxes then they can surely vote online too! I realize it is your worst nightmare as more people would vote because it's easy...
Why close polling places, cut early voting and voting hours?
Why must people stand in long lines for hours just to vote?
There are no long lines. Just another lie.
Who are we to believe? You or our own lying eyes? The long lines with hours long wait times have been all over on TV and online. Just look at the photo at the top of this page? SMH!
I quit believing anything you say long ago. So, there's that...
And my data in the Office of Personnel Management was never hacked, until it was.
That's just your biases running way with you again.
Why are democrats too lazy to vote? How could it be any easier?
Really though, what good reason is there to stop people from voting online, except fear? A good workable system with multiple levels of safeguards and fail-safes could now be developed. Only cranks and incompetents don't feel secure doing their business online anymore. Actually, I believe it could be way more secure than what we have now which is a mish mash of a system nobody can really manage. The way our votes are scanned, counted, tabulated and transmitted by computers now only makes things easier for hackers and cheaters.
I’m sure the government will create a website equal to the one they put together to roll out the ACA…..States control elections PERIOD!
How many countries support on-line voting today? Have any supported it then reversed course?
Look it up...
Ok, I just thought that you might know a little about what you're advocating. My mistake.
Why are you trying to suppress the vote? what are you afraid of? Why are you suppressing the African American vote?