╌>

De Insane-Tis's Platform for 2024

  

Category:  News & Politics

By:  eat-the-press-do-not-read-it  •  last year  •  76 comments

De Insane-Tis's Platform for 2024

Florida's Mini-Trump, De Satan released his platform for the 2024 Presidential Race. Republicans are beaming, Democrats steaming, and non-voters are still "PISSING & MOANING"!

BREAKING NEWS from WOKE NATION:

1. Anti-Jew

2. Anti-Black

3. Anti-Hispanics

4. Anti-GAY

5. Anti-Books

6. Anti-Vac

7. Anti-Immigrants

8. Anti-WOKE

9. Anti-Trans

10. Anti-Abortions

Isn't Governor Antimonious, Sanctimonious?


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Eat The Press Do Not Read It
PhD Guide
1  author  Eat The Press Do Not Read It    last year

Heads up:

If you are traveling to Florida for Spring Break don't say "GAY", one may say: "QUEER, QUEEN, TWISTED SISTER", instead.

It's the law! Seventeen years in prison, with no food for the first four years. No water for the first two years.

Governor "Woke The F*%%K UP" is on a terror!  That happens with very short leaders like Mussolini, Hitler, and Mickey Mouse!

 
 
 
Eat The Press Do Not Read It
PhD Guide
2  author  Eat The Press Do Not Read It    last year

Mini Trump is Making History Up!

 
 
 
Eat The Press Do Not Read It
PhD Guide
3  author  Eat The Press Do Not Read It    last year

Do you have any suggestions for Governor De Santis?

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
3.1  Kavika   replied to  Eat The Press Do Not Read It @3    last year
Do you have any suggestions for Governor De Santis?

quit flip flopping on Ukraine for starters.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
3.1.1  devangelical  replied to  Kavika @3.1    last year

make the trains run on time at disney world ...

R.13512c7fe355dab5abcad84968f8d5be?rik=nu1R8c%2FjjTt8oQ&riu=http%3A%2F%2Fnbatitlechase.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2022%2F08%2FPHOTO-Tallahassee-Mussolini-Ron-DeSantis-Meme.jpg&ehk=eVEjNz3GcREHUZhMZSbIhW6Iib8dYMLuvOy3iGy2C%2FU%3D&risl=&pid=ImgRaw&r=0

 
 
 
bbl-1
Professor Quiet
3.1.2  bbl-1  replied to  Kavika @3.1    last year

He is not flip flopping.  He is an autocrat.  His goal is clear.

 
 
 
Eat The Press Do Not Read It
PhD Guide
3.1.3  author  Eat The Press Do Not Read It  replied to  Kavika @3.1    last year

Good point. I prefer "Go F*&k Yourself"! It's cleaner and besides he looks like he hasn't had that done to him in a long, long time.

Mini-Trump is a Meat Ball Head! Another "Con Man willing to stir up his base to acts of violence and stupidity to elevate him to a position that he is far from being qualified to hold. 

 
 
 
Eat The Press Do Not Read It
PhD Guide
3.1.4  author  Eat The Press Do Not Read It  replied to  Kavika @3.1    last year

Or, suck on the end of the pipe, not the front. Flip Flopping is Miss Lindsey's thing!

 
 
 
Eat The Press Do Not Read It
PhD Guide
3.1.5  author  Eat The Press Do Not Read It  replied to  bbl-1 @3.1.2    last year

Herself a Legend in HER own twisted mind!

 
 
 
bbl-1
Professor Quiet
4  bbl-1    last year

The more insecure Putin feels his position is, the more dangerous the US right wing will become.

DeSantis doesn't need suggestions.  He is banking on the factors of fear, division and prejudice.  And all of this justified with the cross.

 
 
 
Eat The Press Do Not Read It
PhD Guide
4.1  author  Eat The Press Do Not Read It  replied to  bbl-1 @4    last year

What selfishness to sabotage your country for your weak EGO.

FUGAZY HIM! The meatball head, who does he think he is, Donald Jerk Trump's alter-ego. He is more likely Mussolini's Momma!

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Expert
5  Sean Treacy    last year

Is making up  another fake dossier using Russians active in Democratic politics a 2023 thing for you guys, or are you waiting for Biden to pay for it in 2024?

 
 
 
bbl-1
Professor Quiet
5.1  bbl-1  replied to  Sean Treacy @5    last year

The dossier is not fake.  It was drawn up by MI6 agents.  It has yet to be vetted.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Expert
5.1.1  Sean Treacy  replied to  bbl-1 @5.1    last year
It has yet to be vetted.

Lol.  You might be the last true believer in that.

 
 
 
bbl-1
Professor Quiet
5.1.2  bbl-1  replied to  Sean Treacy @5.1.1    last year

Okay.  Who vetted it?  When was that done?

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Expert
5.1.3  Sean Treacy  replied to  bbl-1 @5.1.2    last year

The FBI,   Mueller's team, the media, you name it.  

Everyone in the world knows it was a joke. . 

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
5.1.4  Ronin2  replied to  bbl-1 @5.1.2    last year

Enlighten yourself. Not even CNN believes it anymore.

hortly before the 2016 election, the FBI offered retired British spy Christopher Steele “up to $1 million” to prove the explosive allegations in his dossier about Donald Trump, a senior FBI analyst testified Tuesday.

The cash offer was made during an overseas October 2016 meeting between Steele and several top FBI officials who were trying to corroborate Steele’s claims that the Trump campaign was colluding with Russia to win the election.

FBI supervisory analyst Brian Auten testified that Steele never got the money because he could not “prove the allegations.”

Auten also said Steele refused to provide the names of any of his sources during that meeting, and that Steele didn’t give the FBI anything during that meeting that corroborated the claims in his explosive dossier.

Auten was testifying at the criminal trial of Igor Danchenko , a primary source for Steele’s dossier, who is being prosecuted by special counsel John Durham. Danchenko has pleaded not guilty to five counts of lying to the FBI about his sourcing for some information that ended up in the dossier. His trial kicked off Tuesday at the federal courthouse in Alexandria, Virginia.

We’ve known for some time,thanks to the efforts of special counsel John Durham , that the Steele dossier was a Clinton-camp fabrication. 

Now we know why the allegations it contained were so lurid, clumsy and (to anyone with an iota of sense) obviously fake.

A Wall Street Journal deep dive reveals that Steele’s central charges were based on idle gossip. Not from intel-community insiders with vast source networks. No: from a trio of unremarkable hacks with zero insight into covert affairs, whose only real connections were to Clinton World. 

What an embarrassment for the countless reporters and TV personalities who talked up this tawdry nonsense from total outsiders as a democracy-saving scoop. And for the FBI, which took Steele so seriously.

The nonentities were: Dem stalwart and PR man Charles Dolan Jr.; Olga Galkina, paid flack of a Russian tech entrepreneur;and the primary “researcher” on the dossier, Igor Danchenko. 

Dolan — the apparent source for, among other fantasies, the tale of Trump cavorting with prostitutes at a Moscow hotel — was shocked that some of his chatter was published and reported on as fact. “I’m hoping that this is exposed as fake news ,” he reportedly wrote mere hours after the dossiersaw the light of day 

Galkina, a school buddy of Danchenko’s,came up with the totally bogus storylines about first Carter Page and then Michael Cohen serving as Donald Trump’s Kremlin cutouts— and helped drag her employer, Aleksey Gubarev, into the muck by alleging with no real evidence that he and his company had aided Internet attacks against Hillary Clinton. 

Danchenko, now under indictment for lying to the FBI, passed on these “findings” orally to British ex-spy James Bond Christopher Steele (who’d forbidden him to write notes). Steele then ran with it all, as he (or the Fusion GPS sleaze merchants who’d hired him, after Clinton lawyer Marc Elias hired them ) claimed it all came from his supposed Russian sources or, alternately, sources close to Trump. (Steele doesn’t speak Russian, by the way.)

A Russian-born analyst who provided the bulk of the information for a flawed dossier about former President Donald Trump told an FBI agent he was shocked and dismayed that the speculative information he provided was portrayed as fact, an agent testified Thursday.

FBI agent Kevin Helson is the second bureau employee to testify at the trial of Igor Danchenko, who’s accused of lying to the FBI about his own sources for the information he passed on to British spy Christopher Steele.

The “Steele dossier” contained numerous allegations about connections between Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign and the Kremlin, and also included allegations of salacious sexual activity that Trump supposedly engaged in at a Moscow hotel.

Prosecutors say Danchenko should have been more forthcoming about his own sources and that if he had done so, the FBI would not have treated the dossier as credulously as it did. As it turned out, the FBI used the allegations in the dossier to obtain a surveillance warrant against a Trump campaign staffer, Carter Page.

But keep peddling the BS. I am sure there are some out there still willing to believe it.

 
 
 
Eat The Press Do Not Read It
PhD Guide
5.1.5  author  Eat The Press Do Not Read It  replied to  Sean Treacy @5.1.3    last year

Heap of OVER COOKER BULL CHIPS.

 
 
 
Eat The Press Do Not Read It
PhD Guide
5.1.6  author  Eat The Press Do Not Read It  replied to  Sean Treacy @5.1.1    last year

Thank you for that compliment.

When "Dirty Diaper Donnie" is stuck in prison and calls out, "WIPERS", WHO DO YOU THINK will answer?

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
5.1.7  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Ronin2 @5.1.4    last year
The story of the  Christopher Steele   dossier took its latest turn this week with  the acquittal  of Igor Danchenko, an analyst who worked on the dossier and was accused of lying to the FBI about it. The case that John H. Durham brought against Danchenko was so weak that the judge threw out one of the charges before a jury could deliberate on it, and the jury spent only one day before it acquitted Danchenko of the charges against him.

History will look back on this week as another chapter in the saga of the  Steele dossier , which has always been over-hyped and used by both sides to advance their agendas .

First journalists treated the sensational dossier as proof of Donald Trump’s Manchurian Candidate-style nomination for the U.S. presidency. Supporters of the former president believe he was the victim of a “witch hunt” and that the dossier was a critical part of it.

For those of us in corporate investigations, it is neither.

At heart is confusion over exactly what the Steele dossier actually is.

Fusion GPS was paid —  at first by Republicans  and then later by  Democratic operatives  — to do a deep background check on Donald Trump. The Steele dossier was just raw intelligence based on rumors about Trump . At the time of the investigation, it would have certainly made sense to find out everything possible about Trump and his Russian ties — there was certainly enough smoke around this topic.

Much of the Steele dossier hasn’t been disproved to date (Oct. 22, 2022), but rather has gained greater credence based on Trump’s turbulent presidency . For instance, Trump’s imprisoned campaign chair Paul Manafort passed along campaign data  to a Russian agent . Trump lied to the public about having no aspirations for deals in Russia when his team had been  chasing a project in Moscow  throughout his campaign. Most infamously, Trump undermined U.S. intelligence  in Helsinki  with Russian President Vladimir Putin by his side by agreeing with the dictator that he thought Russia had nothing to do with interfering with the U.S election. In this way, much of what the Steele dossier claimed about Trump being influenced by the Russians seems true .

The Steele dossier has always been misunderstood | The Hill

So how should we unpack the Steele dossier from an intelligence perspective?

I spent almost 30 years producing what CIA calls “raw reporting” from human agents. At heart, this is what Orbis did. They were not producing finished analysis, but were passing on to a client distilled reporting that they had obtained in response to specific questions. When disseminating a raw intelligence report, an intelligence agency is not vouching for the accuracy of the information provided by the report’s sources and/or subsources. Rather it is claiming that it has made strenuous efforts to validate that it is reporting accurately what the sources/subsources claim has happened. The onus for sorting out the veracity and for putting the reporting in context against other reporting—which may confirm or disconfirm the reporting—rests with the intelligence community’s professional analytic cadre. In the case of the dossier, Orbis was not saying that everything that it reported was accurate, but that it had made a good-faith effort to pass along faithfully what its identified insiders said was accurate. This is routine in the intelligence business. And this form of reporting is often a critical product in putting together more final intelligence assessments.

Steele’s product is not a report delivered with a bow at the end of an investigation. Instead, it is a series of contemporaneous raw reports that do not have the benefit of hindsight . Among the unnamed sources are “a senior Russian foreign ministry official,” “a former top-level intelligence officer still active inside the Kremlin,” and “a close associate of Republican U.S. presidential candidate Donald Trump.” Thus, the reports are not an attempt to connect the dots, but instead an effort to uncover new and potentially relevant dots in the first place.

In this regard, does any of the information we have learned since June 2016 assign greater or less credibility to the information?  Were the people mentioned in the report real? Were their affiliations correct? Did any of the activities reported happen as predicted?

To a large extent, yes.

The most obvious occurrence that could not have been known to Orbis in June 2016, but shines bright in retrospect is the fact that Russia undertook a coordinated and massive effort to disrupt the 2016 election to help Donald Trump , as the U.S. intelligence community itself later concluded. Well before any public knowledge of these events, the Orbis report identified multiple elements of the Russian operation including a cyber campaign, leaked documents related to Hillary Clinton, and meetings with Paul Manafort and other Trump affiliates to reportedly discuss the receipt of stolen documents . Steele could not have known that the Russians stole information on Hillary Clinton, or that they were considering means to weaponize them in the U.S. election, all of which turned out to be stunningly accurate .

We have also subsequently learned of Trump’s long-standing interest in, and experience with Russia and Russians. A February New York Times article reported that phone records and intercepted calls show that members of Trump’s campaign and other Trump associates had repeated contacts with senior Russian officials in the year before the election .

Although Trump has denied the connections, numerous credible reports suggest that both he and  Manafort have long-standing relationships with Russians, and pro-Putin groups.

The quid pro quo as alleged in the dossier was for the Trump team to “sideline” the Ukrainian issue in the campaign . We learned subsequently that the Trump platform committee changed only a single plank in the 60-page Republican platform prior to the Republican convention. Of the hundreds of Republican positions and proposals, they altered only the single sentence that called for maintaining or increasing sanctions against Russia, increasing aid for Ukraine and “providing lethal defensive weapons” to the Ukrainian military.  The Trump team reportedly  changed the wording to the more benign, “appropriate assistance.”

I think it is fair to say that the report is not “garbage” as several commentators claimed. The Orbis sources certainly got some things right—details that they could not have known prior. Steele and his company appear serious and credible.

One large portion of the dossier is crystal clear, certain, consistent, and corroborated. Russia’s goal all along has been to do damage to America and our leadership role in the world. 

A lot of the Steele dossier has since been corroborated. (slate.com)

if the FBI had failed to investigate such allegations, we (and the American people) would’ve been entitled to find them derelict in carrying out their duties

FBI Would’ve Been Derelict Not to Use Steele Dossier for the Carter Page FISA Warrant | Brennan Center for Justice

So the long and short is that those who keep regurgitating the lie that this was all some "hoax" clearly have their heads shoved up their own asses and don't know what the fuck they are talking about and don't understand what the Steele Dossier was or how it was actually used. It was never a complete investigation with conclusions drawn, it was simply a compilation of both public information about Trumps connections with Russia and a basic assessment and prediction of Russia's goals in messing with American elections and an accounting of the "smoke" that surrounded the Trump campaign which was later corroborated by the Republican Senate investigation that concluded that Russia did in fact launch an aggressive effort to interfere in the election on Trump’s behalf, confirmed numerous ties between Russian operatives and the Trump campaign, Natalia Veselnitskaya, did have “significant connections to the Russian government, including the Russian intelligence services,” and Paul Manaforts "high-level access and willingness to share information with individuals closely affiliated with the Russian intelligence services, particularly Kilimnik, represented a grave counterintelligence threat,” . Those are the fucking facts.

Senate panel finds Russia interfered in the 2016 U.S. election | PBS NewsHour

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Expert
5.1.8  Sean Treacy  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @5.1.7    last year

Lol.  Slate from 2017. 

By all means, out yourself as a true believer in the Steele dossier. It's like wearing a sign calling yourself a 9.11 truther, people know to stay away.

There's nothing in your babble that validates the Steele dossier, just a lot of excuse making for why it was taken seriously. 

The best is the "FBI would have been derelict not to use it to spy on Carter Page" after their liar Adam Schiff claimed it wasn't used by the FBI when it became clear the dossier was just garbage. And even schiff now publicly runs away from it because "he couldn't have known it was based on lies"

We know now (that Slate didn't in 2017) , that Steele just exaggerated rumors that were told to him by a PR Rep who worked for the Democratic Party.  

 
 
 
Eat The Press Do Not Read It
PhD Guide
5.1.9  author  Eat The Press Do Not Read It  replied to  bbl-1 @5.1.2    last year

Crapping in one's pants is not the same as using a commode. "Dirty Diaper Donnie" gets confused when he is upset, which is all the time.
l

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
5.1.10  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Sean Treacy @5.1.8    last year
Lol.  Slate from 2017. 

The Hill article is from October 2022 and comes to the same conclusions.

There's nothing in your babble that validates the Steele dossier, just a lot of excuse making for why it was taken seriously.

What I linked proved conclusively one important fact, the investigation was NOT based solely on the Steele Dossier and the investigation WAS warranted no matter how many times fucking loser Trump brown noser's claim it was 'a hoax'. The silence from those with their heads up Trumps ass who continue to avoid the elephant in the room, being the Republican Senate led investigation conclusions that those on the Trump campaign did represent "a grave counterintelligence threat", is deafening.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Expert
5.1.11  Sean Treacy  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @5.1.10    last year
Hill article is from October 2022 and comes to the same conclusions.

The Op-Ed  from  2022 did not claim the dossier was corroborated and it  of course it engages in the usual left wing insinuation that the Steele Dossier was initially paid for by Republicans.

There's no basis in any of your links to believe Steele's made up claims are real (even Schiff now admits they were based on lies).

People who still believe its allegations are ignorant dupes. 

he investigation was NOT based solely on the Steele Dossier

No one ever claimed it was solely based on the Steele dossier.  But despite lying Adam Schiff told America, it was in fact instrumental in allowing the government to spy on an American citizen. 

atalia Veselnitskaya, 

Yes, the FUSION GPS client was a Russian. 

lusions that those on the Trump campaign did represent "a grave counterintelligence threat", is deafening.

No, read your own cut and paste. It opined  Manafort was a "grave counterintelligence threat", the liar Steele was more focused on imaginary meetings between Cohen and Russians in Prague, and rumors of a piss tape created by a Democratic Public Relations consultant that Steele used to base his lie that Russia was blackmailing' Trump. 

 
 
 
Eat The Press Do Not Read It
PhD Guide
5.1.12  author  Eat The Press Do Not Read It  replied to  Sean Treacy @5.1.11    last year

Hmm, So, Trump has NO financial relationship with Russian oligarchs or Putin. Are you certain of that, Sherlock?


 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
5.2  Texan1211  replied to  Sean Treacy @5    last year
Is making up  another fake dossier using Russians active in Democratic politics a 2023 thing for you guys, or are you waiting for Biden to pay for it in 2024?

All possible based on history.

They really bought the whole Steele Dossier hook, line and sinker.

I could almost forgive them for that if they ever wake the hell up and admit it was fake shit paid for by Democrats to screw Trump.

 
 
 
Eat The Press Do Not Read It
PhD Guide
5.2.1  author  Eat The Press Do Not Read It  replied to  Texan1211 @5.2    last year

In the event, you have forgotten the Confederacy is KA-POTE!

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
5.2.2  Texan1211  replied to  Eat The Press Do Not Read It @5.2.1    last year
In the event, you have forgotten the Confederacy is KA-POTE!

What in the actual FuCK are you going on about?

Of course the Confederacy is dead. Too bad so many Democrats survived the war, though.

 
 
 
Eat The Press Do Not Read It
PhD Guide
5.2.3  author  Eat The Press Do Not Read It  replied to  Texan1211 @5.2.2    last year

Were the 600,000 dead Americans worth the WAR to continue to force people to work free to make others rich?

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
5.2.4  Texan1211  replied to  Eat The Press Do Not Read It @5.2.3    last year
Were the 600,000 dead Americans worth the WAR to continue to force people to work free to make others rich?

yes it was worth the 600000 dead to end slavery, although of course we should have taken steps to reduce to power the Democrats held, especially in the Jim Crow South.

What fucked-up kind of question is that?

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
5.2.5  bugsy  replied to  Texan1211 @5.2.2    last year
Too bad so many Democrats survived the war, though.

The ones that survived and their ancestors today are still pissed their slaves were freed.

 
 
 
Eat The Press Do Not Read It
PhD Guide
5.2.6  author  Eat The Press Do Not Read It  replied to  Texan1211 @5.2.4    last year

An interesting one. The Southern Democrats were pro-secessionists, yet, today it is the Southern Maga Republicans that are clamoring to set up their own country.  

What does that imply to you?

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
5.2.7  Texan1211  replied to  Eat The Press Do Not Read It @5.2.6    last year
An interesting one. The Southern Democrats were pro-secessionists,

Traitors all.

Bunch of racists.

Bunch of Democrats.

 
 
 
Gsquared
Senior Expert
6  Gsquared    last year

256

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
6.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  Gsquared @6    last year

It took me til just now to get that.

Yes...I need more naps

 
 
 
Eat The Press Do Not Read It
PhD Guide
6.1.1  author  Eat The Press Do Not Read It  replied to  Trout Giggles @6.1    last year

Ron puts everyone to sleep. It happens even when folks see his photo.

Not just at his "Satan's Rally in the Alley". Wherever he goes people fall instantly to sleep.

It's in the Bible, somewhere!


 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
6.1.2  cjcold  replied to  Eat The Press Do Not Read It @6.1.1    last year
Rally in the Alley

Good name for a rock band.

Ha! beat you to it Barry!

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
7  Texan1211    last year

This is mildly entertaining.

It's always fun to watch how many adjectives liberals can throw together in a single sentence to mischaracterize a man they love to hate!

Hitler reference--check

Mussolini reference--check

Putin reference--check

Religion reference--check

Always good for a few laughs!

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
7.1  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  Texan1211 @7    last year

Here are some more adjectives to amuse you, Tex. 

Why anti-Hispanic?  I thought those fools have started supporting that fascist book-burning cross-burning mouse-trapping Snow White's castle-thief bastard.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
7.1.1  Texan1211  replied to  Buzz of the Orient @7.1    last year
Why anti-Hispanic?  I thought those fools have started supporting that fascist book-burning cross-burning mouse-trapping Snow White's castle-thief bastard.

What are you talking about?

Who is a fascist?

Please tell me you aren't swallowing the swill!

 
 
 
Eat The Press Do Not Read It
PhD Guide
7.1.2  author  Eat The Press Do Not Read It  replied to  Buzz of the Orient @7.1    last year

They did, but they had room for one more group to hate.

 
 
 
Eat The Press Do Not Read It
PhD Guide
7.1.3  author  Eat The Press Do Not Read It  replied to  Texan1211 @7.1.1    last year

Try the GOP Fascist Hot-Line, 1-800 EAT SHAT!

Ask for Ron De Satan, extension 666.  

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
7.1.4  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  Texan1211 @7.1.1    last year

Well, at least you weren't upset about my other adjectives.  LOL

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
7.1.5  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  Eat The Press Do Not Read It @7.1.2    last year

What a disappointment.  However, if the Hispanics are going to support the GOP, why does the GOP bitch so much about them?

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
7.1.6  Texan1211  replied to  Buzz of the Orient @7.1.4    last year
Well, at least you weren't upset about my other adjectives.  LOL

I know you know HOW to read.

I wonder if you understand what you read.

Here is a hint for you.

If I say something is funny or entertaining, you can rest assured I am not upset by it.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
7.1.7  Texan1211  replied to  Eat The Press Do Not Read It @7.1.3    last year

Ah, more sick humor!

LOL!

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
7.1.8  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  Texan1211 @7.1.6    last year

.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
7.1.9  Texan1211  replied to  Buzz of the Orient @7.1.8    last year

Best. Post. Ever.

Yay!!!

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
7.1.10  cjcold  replied to  Buzz of the Orient @7.1    last year
mouse-trapping

Huh? is there something I missed?

 
 
 
Eat The Press Do Not Read It
PhD Guide
7.1.11  author  Eat The Press Do Not Read It  replied to  cjcold @7.1.10    last year

Gov. Deficits attacked Disney Land because they have an Annual Drag Ball, and threaten to shut it done. Drag Queen Show will now be monitored.

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
7.1.12  cjcold  replied to  Eat The Press Do Not Read It @7.1.11    last year

So it is a mouse thingy?

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
7.1.13  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  cjcold @7.1.10    last year
"mouse-trapping
Huh? is there something I missed?"

447-4476611_mickey-mouse-mouse-trap-hd-png-download.png

 
 
 
Eat The Press Do Not Read It
PhD Guide
7.2  author  Eat The Press Do Not Read It  replied to  Texan1211 @7    last year

Glad you like it. You can lick it, too. Jack Smith likes it.

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
7.2.1  cjcold  replied to  Eat The Press Do Not Read It @7.2    last year

I would prefer Jacquelin Smith licking me.

 
 
 
Eat The Press Do Not Read It
PhD Guide
7.2.2  author  Eat The Press Do Not Read It  replied to  cjcold @7.2.1    11 months ago

Yes, that would be an upgrade.

 
 
 
Eat The Press Do Not Read It
PhD Guide
7.3  author  Eat The Press Do Not Read It  replied to  Texan1211 @7    last year

Thank you, thank you! That's why I am here for the LAUGHS!

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
7.3.1  Greg Jones  replied to  Eat The Press Do Not Read It @7.3    last year

We'd laugh if it was funny, but it ain't.

But we wouldn't laughing with you, we'd be laughing at you.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
7.3.2  Texan1211  replied to  Eat The Press Do Not Read It @7.3    last year
Thank you, thank you! That's why I am here for the LAUGHS!

I have often laughed at your posts!

 
 
 
Eat The Press Do Not Read It
PhD Guide
7.3.3  author  Eat The Press Do Not Read It  replied to  Greg Jones @7.3.1    last year

Greg: "You are so special!"  I love it when people laugh at you. It's thrilling. Have you ever been to a comedy club?

That's all the audience does - LAUGH at U! 

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
7.3.4  cjcold  replied to  Eat The Press Do Not Read It @7.3    last year
for the LAUGHS!

Partied with Rodney Dangerfield once and he said the same thing.

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
7.3.5  cjcold  replied to  Texan1211 @7.3.2    last year

Funny how far right wingers here lack the ability to spell.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
7.3.6  Texan1211  replied to  cjcold @7.3.5    last year
Funny how far right wingers here lack the ability to spell.

IF you can find a spelling error in my post, by all means point it out.

Otherwise, WTF are you yakking about?????

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
9  Jeremy Retired in NC    last year

Oh look, another boogieman for the left to dislike because they put the country first instead of checking blocks.

 
 
 
Eat The Press Do Not Read It
PhD Guide
10  author  Eat The Press Do Not Read It    last year

My wife saw Ron Sanctimonious on TV and instantly fell asleep before her high heel shoe hit the screen.

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
10.1  cjcold  replied to  Eat The Press Do Not Read It @10    last year
her high heel shoe

Have destroyed 3 large screen TVs In the last 3 years.

Am I doing something wrong?

 
 
 
Eat The Press Do Not Read It
PhD Guide
10.1.1  author  Eat The Press Do Not Read It  replied to  cjcold @10.1    last year

No, you have great accuracy!

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
10.1.2  cjcold  replied to  Eat The Press Do Not Read It @10.1.1    last year

I knew going in that studying iron palm would have consequences.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
11  Greg Jones    last year

Man....the local libbers are sure scared of DeSantis...are you sure this isn't satire.

It sure isn't comedy/

 
 
 
Eat The Press Do Not Read It
PhD Guide
11.1  author  Eat The Press Do Not Read It  replied to  Greg Jones @11    last year

You are absolutely correct. It is an evisceration of a Mini-Won't A-Be-FAKE Hitler. Stop the scum as it starts to roll down the hill before it causes real damage.

Knowing the ENEMY is Half the Battle! De Satan is more DANGEROUS than Agent Orange sitting in the White House playing with Nuclear Buttons. Thank God, he, too, is a FRAUD!

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
11.1.1  Texan1211  replied to  Eat The Press Do Not Read It @11.1    last year

Are very many Democratic loons believing that Republicans are fascists?

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
11.1.2  cjcold  replied to  Texan1211 @11.1.1    last year

Pretty sure that far-right wing fascism owns those with sub 100 Iqs.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
11.1.3  Texan1211  replied to  cjcold @11.1.2    last year
Pretty sure that far-right wing fascism owns those with sub 100 Iqs.

Thank you.

[Deleted]

“It isn't so much that liberals are ignorant. It's just that they know so many things that aren't so.”

― Ronald Reagan

Still right after all these years as your post clearly illustrates.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
11.1.4  bugsy  replied to  cjcold @11.1.2    last year
Pretty sure that far-right wing fascism owns those with sub 100 Iqs.

Obviously you haven't been paying attention to most of the leftists on here. Are they fascist too?

Actually...let me answer that.

Some are.

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
11.1.5  cjcold  replied to  bugsy @11.1.4    last year

Fascism is fascism. 

My dictionary reads the same as yours.

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
11.2  cjcold  replied to  Greg Jones @11    last year

So far right wing fascists have been insane since WW2.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
11.2.1  Texan1211  replied to  cjcold @11.2    last year

both of them?

 
 

Who is online

Gazoo
JohnRussell
Sparty On
Outis
Kavika


72 visitors