╌>

The future of MAGA

  

Category:  Op/Ed

By:  vic-eldred  •  last year  •  150 comments

The future of MAGA
After decades of de-industrialization fueled by globalization, Vance argued, the Trump administration’s economic agenda — which combines protectionist tariff policies, deregulation, strict immigration restrictions and tax cuts for corporations — is designed to foster an environment in which innovation and re-industrialization can be mutually reinforcing.

Link to quote: JD Vance Maps Out a Future for the Tech and MAGA Right - POLITICO


The radical left in America wanted to believe that the MAGA movement would not last without Donald Trump. I think they now know that it will survive and probably flourish after Trump is gone.


When Trump picked JD Vance to be his VP many thought it to be a critical mistake since he was after all, a white male from a red state and brought nothing different to the ticket. However, those perceptions were changed as soon as the sharp & witty Vance began appearing on msm news shows where he outdebated everyone who took him on. 

Added to the mix is the very capable and highly respected Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who is a recent convert to MAGA and there is now a real concern on the radical left that MAGA is here to stay.

It should also be noted that there is a counterrevolution to the left worldwide. It is evident in Europe where the UK has resorted to censorship and Germany where one political party has been demonized, yet continues to grow in popularity, in France where everything is being done to preserve the status quo and even in Italy with the rise of Giorgia Meloni.

No, the Republican Party is never going back to Bob Dole, John McCain or Mitt Romney.


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1  author  Vic Eldred    last year


We can expect more violence from them as their fate becomes more evident.


The end of their reign is near.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.1  devangelical  replied to  Vic Eldred @1    last year

here's the future of maga right here. wandering around aimlessly, as if he's looking for the prime minister ...

gee, I wonder what his MRI was about, that the white house tried to hide ...

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
1.1.1  CB  replied to  devangelical @1.1    last year

Actually. That was okay. It appears to me that he was being ushered about the room/presentation. This occurs when physical cues are given (non-verbal hand 'steering') and not verbal steering. :) Sometimes, ahead of the proceeding, a leader (or his/her staff) can be prepped as to how to 'proceed' through a formality/ceremony. That appears not to have been the case here. ;)


I remember when First Lady Michelle Obama mistook a que and while standing directly next to Queen Elizabeth II slid her arm behind the back and waist of the Queen. And, during the same state visit, President Obama started an 'official' toast and had to pause mid-sentence as the Queen anthem began to loudly play over the assemblage.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2  JohnRussell    last year

This little article is pure propaganda. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.1  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @2    last year

You think MAGA dies when Trump leaves?

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
2.1.1  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.1    last year

Where will they find an imbecile of Trump’s magnitude to replace him?  That is a heavy lift.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.1.2  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @2.1.1    last year

For an imbecile he has overcome everything the scum tossed at him. I'd say that is quite impressive. Looking at your side of the equation, I'm wondering if democrats will ever win another election. I guess the left is down to hoping for a recession.

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
2.1.3  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.1.2    last year

Overcome?  Lol.  He has no conscience, no shame, no sense of dignity, no pride, no patriotism, no honesty.  Thats not overcoming anything, it’s just a type of armor that nobody would ever want for themselves but him.  He is a pig and proud of it.  Sorry pigs, didn’t mean to drag you down to that level.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.1.4  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @2.1.3    last year

Aside from name-calling, are you going to weigh in on whether MAGA lives without him?

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
2.1.5  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.1.4    last year

MAGA is as self destructive as it is government destructive.  Good governance is pruning overgrowth, not ripping it out at the roots.  MAGA is feeling the pain of their own doing as we speak.  They will eventually be relying on the federal government to bail them out of the positions they have cornered themselves into.  

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
2.1.6  Hallux  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.1.4    last year

For several years they will be like the waning seasons of The Apprentice that required successively worse characters to maintain interest. You could be a finalist along with Laura Loomer.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.1.7  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @2.1.5    last year

I'll take that as a: you don't know.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.1.8  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Hallux @2.1.6    last year

You always like to bring me into it.

I'll add you to the don't know list.

Anyone else?

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
2.1.9  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.1.7    last year

No more than you actually know, though you obviously think you do.  Trump is old and his time is physiologically limited.  He’s using every minute of that to destroy what he won’t be around to suffer through.  MAGA thinks he’s doing a great job, because MAGA couldn’t govern itself out of a paper bag.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.1.10  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @2.1.9    last year
No more than you actually know,

Our readers are likely to disagree.

Still no answer?

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.1.11  JohnRussell  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @2.1.9    last year

When you look at Trump these days, he looks like shit. His eyes droop , his speech has slowed considerably and when he walks he looks like he is dragging himself around.  Visually he is utterly unimpressive. And then he opens his mouth and it gets much worse. 

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
2.1.12  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.1.10    last year

My opinion is glaringly obvious.  Stop pretending that any of us knows anything about an answer to your question.  Trump is as likely to turn the planet in a radioactive pile of dust over the rest of his term as maga is to become a permanent fixture.  He does not care what happens to a planet he is not permitted to continue living in.  That is who he is.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.1.13  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @2.1.12    last year
Stop pretending that any of us knows anything

Fair enough.

I have a doctor appointment anyway.

Have a good one.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.1.14  devangelical  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.1.4    last year
weigh in on whether MAGA lives without him

maga pedophiles will continue to thrive with the help of their christo-fascist facilitators ...

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
2.1.15  Gsquared  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.1.10    last year
Our readers are likely to disagree.

Not a single one with more than half a brain could possibly disagree.

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
2.1.16  Nerm_L  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.1    last year
You think MAGA dies when Trump leaves?

Trump has drowned MAGA in Newt Gingrich's bathtub.  Look at the quoted text: "Vance argued, the Trump administration’s economic agenda — which combines protectionist tariff policies, deregulation, strict immigration restrictions and tax cuts for corporations".

Where's the government investment in economic development and industrial growth?  Tariffs combined with tax cuts is the moron's approach.  That's TEA Party on steroids.

Tariffs only work if the government becomes directly involved in expanding the industrial base.  The government needs to be directly engaged in industrial research and increased efforts to transfer technology to industry.  The policy environment needs to include tangible incentives like fast-tracking depreciation, providing tax incentives & labor subsidies for job creation, more government resources to speed regulatory review and compliance, and a host of other production related incentives.  The government must raise taxes on paper speculation, hoarding behavior, and unnecessary middleman functions, and host of other drains on a productive economy.

MAGA is supposed to be about the idea that American works when people work.  That's going to require more than punishing people.  If people are supposed to work then the priority is to create jobs.  And that's going to require direct government involvement in the private sector.  MAGA is not supposed to be only about the money.  The TEA Party focuses on money and ignores everything else.  That's what J.D. Vance is advocating, focusing on money and ignoring everything else.

  

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
2.1.17  CB  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.1.2    last year

The man's mendacity is going to eventually wear MAGA support out. Just wait and see. BTW, Trump has traveled this life alone doing his own 'bidding'. . .once he decides he is "too big" for MAGA, y'all become the "extreme Right" to his mind. Also, he is aging 'poorly.'

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
2.1.18  bugsy  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @2.1.1    last year
Where will they find an imbecile

I guess they will have to follow the left as they tried to vote in a DEA VP to follow a dementia P

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
2.1.19  bugsy  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @2.1.5    last year
MAGA is as self destructive

You mean like the democratic party with a 19 percent (probably less now( approval rating?

That self destruction?

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
2.1.20  bugsy  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @2.1.12    last year
My opinion is glaringly obvious.

Yes it is.....and very wrong

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
2.1.21  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  bugsy @2.1.18    last year

I guess they will have to follow the left as they tried to vote in a DEA VP to follow a dementia P

Did you just glitch?!  Your handler should submit a ticket to IT and get this resolved immediately.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.1.22  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  CB @2.1.17    last year

Really?

Are we talking about the same guy?

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
2.1.23  bugsy  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @2.1.21    last year
Did you just glitch?!

No but let me put it in language you can understand...

I guess they will have to follow the left as they tried to vote in a DEI Vice President to follow a dementia riddled President

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
2.1.24  CB  replied to  bugsy @2.1.23    last year

DEI vice-president? Demeaning rhetoric-is that all some MAGA supporters 'got'? Well, Some MAGA supporters, especially the so-called "evangelical wing," think so less of their "God" that they gave the job of president to the biggest JERK in the country simply because they could not 'cope' with Others being on the same level as themselves. . . or better. Others do not care about how high' conservatives rise.

 
 
 
Thomas
Professor Guide
2.1.25  Thomas  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @2.1.1    last year

Vance lacks the panache of Trump, but he is smarter in a crappy way. 

I figure that they will use AI to keep Trump "alive" and pushing stupid ideas that will ruin the economy. At least that is the rumor that I am starting here. 

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
2.1.26  CB  replied to  Thomas @2.1.25    last year

Vance, I will agree, sure can misrepresent others and tell a lie with a 'straight' face. Thus, in that regard he is a very dangerous guy to permit to hold sway over 'us.' 

 
 
 
Thomas
Professor Guide
2.1.27  Thomas  replied to  Nerm_L @2.1.16    last year
Trump has drowned MAGA in Newt Gingrich's bathtub.  

I don't care who you are or why you're posting, that has to be the best slam of the year

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
2.1.28  evilone  replied to  Nerm_L @2.1.16    last year

You keep talking about the TEA Party as if it's still relevant. MAGA used the TEA Party to advance into power and dumped them when it worked. I've not heard about Grover Norquist in years. Not since he was attacked by MAGA for having an Arab wife.

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
2.1.29  MrFrost  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.1    last year

You think MAGA dies when Trump leaves?

If not, the next Dem president should use the DOJ to go after any and all MAGA supporters.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.1.30  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  MrFrost @2.1.29    last year

The last one already did that, remember?

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
2.1.31  CB  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.1.30    last year

It can get worse. . . a lot worse. . . before it gets better. I pray God touches the spirit of this current president and his MAGA supporters—especially the so-called "evangelical Right" to seek truth and to reject errored-thinking. . . and the guile and lying everyday of the week just so as to be different than Others. Lord, let us remember that we are 'One' people borne out of many and do better for all once again.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.1.32  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  CB @2.1.31    last year
I pray God touches the spirit of this current president and his MAGA supporters—especially the so-called "evangelical Right" to seek truth and to reject errored-thinking.

Maybe we could send them to reeducation camps?

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
2.1.33  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Thomas @2.1.27    last year
I don't care who you are or why you're posting, that has to be the best slam of the year

But I think he meant Grover Norquist's bathtub. He was the Republican quoted as saying "I don't want to abolish government. I simply want to reduce it to the size where I can drag it into the bathroom and drown it in the bathtub".

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
2.1.34  CB  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.1.32    last year

As a MAGA supporter here writes from time to time: 'I have no clue what you are writing about' - care to further elaborate or should I just let it 'go'? I await your reply.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.1.35  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  CB @2.1.34    last year

You said their thinking was erroneous. How would you like to correct it?

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
2.1.36  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.1.32    last year
Maybe we could send them to reeducation camps?

There are no doubt millions among the MAGA crowd who think that's what's needed for the liberals and lgtbq community in America. Like this elected Michigan Republicans husband who I'm sure would be a fan of reeducation camps.

A Michigan Republican who was elected treasurer of Maple Valley Township in Montcalm County last year says she didn't realize her husband was a  neo-Nazi   until she was contacted by a reporter for the British newspaper   The Guardian   over the summer about a racist, antisemitic YouTube channel he founded

That channel, called Shameless Sperg, featured videos with titles like “Why I Hate Jews” and “Black Crime Matters.”  "the videos he posted — in which he said America “was built by and for white people” and talked about Nazis in the 1930s breaking “the chains of Jewish tyranny in Germany” — until they "became an issue."

Her husband put out his own statement that said, “I’m still going to speak the truth. I’m not sorry for anything I said. I’m not sorry for anything I’ve done. I meant every word.”

He also, according to the report, "lobbed anti-gay slurs" at family friends for spreading The Guardian article, and said "he wouldn’t forget how they’d treated him."

Town angered as Michigan Republican pleads ignorance to husband’s ultra-right career

It's not a mystery as to why the alt-right neo-Nazi's and white supremacists support Trump and the Republican party. When the rest of us are watching in horror as the Trump Gestapo harass citizens, shoot pepper balls at priest's heads and demand papers of any brown skinned people on the street, the neo-Nazis are cheering and applauding.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.1.37  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @2.1.36    last year
Like this elected Michigan Republicans husband who I'm sure would be a fan of reeducation camps.

I don't know what he would "like," but I do know that Hillary Clinton already called for it:

Failed 2016 presidential candidate Hillary Clinton called supporters of former President Donald Trump “cult members” who  require “formal deprogramming”  while explaining in a CNN interview why Democrats needed to  defeat the Republican front-runner  and his allies.

Hillary Clinton calls for 'formal deprogramming' of Trump supporters

So maybe you would like to answer my question, since CB couldn't understand it?

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
2.1.38  CB  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @2.1.36    last year

Let's talk about what MAGA supporters-especially the so-called, "evangelical Right," will not publicly. 

With so many versions of Christian beliefs: Which branch on the Christian 'tree' should the citizens of this nation give 'dominion' over us? Which? 

These poor evangelical fools that have resolved to compel our nation to accept their OPINION (faith) as "all and all"- do not realize what a mess Christianity has made of itself when it can not even decide (or have wisdom to declare) which version or versions of its OPINION about God is ACCURATE and FIT for a great people like us!

(Note: I love my faith/belief/opinion) but I am willing to openly discuss its truth (or error) in public and let it defend itself or not! My faith will either stand or fall on its own merits.)

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
2.1.39  CB  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.1.35    last year
I pray God touches the spirit of this current president and his MAGA supporters—especially the so-called "evangelical Right" to seek truth and to reject errored-thinking. . . and the guile and lying everyday of the week just so as to be different than Others. Lord, let us remember that we are 'One' people borne out of many and do better for all once again.

The corrective action is for God to bring forward spiritually towards all of us. Lord, let our country rediscover or even newly accept the love for all its people of goodwill. It is time for all this bitterness, distrust, and hatred to end in the hearts and minds of all our citizenry so we can become a HEALTHY people once more-or once and for all. And Lord, let those whom are exploiting our nation receive their just desserts in time. . . for what they do is proper wickedness and we can not accept it.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.1.40  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  CB @2.1.39    last year
The corrective action is for God to bring forward spiritually towards all of us.

Is He doing that?

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
2.1.41  CB  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.1.40    last year

Who is "He"? Please be clear if you reply.

 
 
 
Thomas
Professor Guide
2.1.42  Thomas  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @2.1.33    last year

Dammit. Now I remember that it loses some of its originality.  

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.1.43  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  CB @2.1.41    last year

He is the God you mentioned and that I quoted you on.

You said that he needs "to bring forward spiritually towards all of us." 

I'm asking if He is doing that? Maybe I should have asked if anyone is looking for him?  How about those Gospel Churches in Chicago? Are they reaching out to the community? Or has the community abandoned the Church?

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
2.1.44  CB  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.1.43    last year

God is a Spirit (not flesh), thus God has no gender despite the biblical anthropomorphism (us) in the Bible. Were God a "Man" - god would be subject to the deficiencies of men (such as lying; stealing; cheating, and so forth and so on). Thus, God is Spirit and it befits the entity to be so.

As for what God is doing towards MAGA. . . who knows? It does appear that 'combat' is what MAGA is expressing—albeit political combat at the present alone. 

The bible says this about God: 

Psalms 98 9.  . . .[F]or God is coming to judge the earth; God will judge the world with righteousness; And the peoples with EQUITY. 

Lord, let our country rediscover or even newly accept the love for all its people of goodwill. It is time for all this bitterness, distrust, and hatred to end in the hearts and minds of all our citizenry so we can become a HEALTHY people once more-or once and for all. And Lord, let those individuals-high and low-exploiting our nation receive their just desserts in time. . . for what they do is proper wickedness and we can not accept it.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.1.45  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  CB @2.1.44    last year

You best deliver the word to the churches in urban America.

Good luck.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
2.1.46  CB  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.1.45    last year

Prayer is good for all needing it, Vic! By the way, what do you have to write about "equity" now that you can positively read about it in the bible?

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
2.1.47  Trout Giggles  replied to  CB @2.1.46    last year

What does the Our Father say? Forgive us our trespasses as we forgive those who trespass against us?

Been awhile since I said that prayer. I use to get 5 of those for penance when I went to confession

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.1.48  devangelical  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.1.45    last year
You best deliver the word to the churches in urban America.

I don't think it's a smart idea these days to be around large groups of evangelicals ...

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.1.49  devangelical  replied to  Trout Giggles @2.1.47    last year
Been awhile since I said that prayer. I use to get 5 of those for penance when I went to confession

what, no cash handy to buy off the priest? were you over the age of 14 at the time?

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
2.1.50  Trout Giggles  replied to  devangelical @2.1.49    last year

I don't carry cash and they don't take credit cards

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
2.1.51  CB  replied to  Trout Giggles @2.1.50    last year

Well, I have done a great many things in my life; but directly pay a priest for 'services rendered' ain't one of those. :)

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
2.1.52  Trout Giggles  replied to  CB @2.1.51    last year

I got married by a priest and I think we only had to give a donation to the parish.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
2.1.53  CB  replied to  Trout Giggles @2.1.52    last year

In my versions, plural, of faith. . .I had pastors (but not a priest - I should be clear about that). I do understand paying for such services to church officials. Weddings, funerals, and such "we" generally-speaking would give a STIPEND to the church 'practitioner' for services rendered. You reminded me of that just now. 

 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Participates
2.2  1stwarrior  replied to  JohnRussell @2    last year

Seriously John - coming from you?

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
2.3  Hallux  replied to  JohnRussell @2    last year

Did you expect anything else? It's like listening to a Shari Lewis never ending ditty sung by Lamb Chop.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.3.1  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Hallux @2.3    last year

I'm as usual, just trying to be helpful.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.3.2  JohnRussell  replied to  Hallux @2.3    last year

When I read this "news" column, all I expect is delusion. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.3.3  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @2.3.2    last year

Well, you are at a disadvantage John. Think about all that you read & listen to.

 
 
 
Thomas
Professor Guide
2.3.4  Thomas  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.3.3    last year
Think about all that you read & listen to

That's why he considers this column delusional

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.3.5  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Thomas @2.3.4    last year

That was my point

 
 
 
Thomas
Professor Guide
2.3.6  Thomas  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.3.5    last year

Not the way I meant it.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3  author  Vic Eldred    last year

BTW, has anybody seen the latest horrible truck disaster, courtesy of the sanctuary state of California?

For our readers:




Please vote to save yourselves.

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
3.1  Hallux  replied to  Vic Eldred @3    last year

FOX is a mixture of schadenfreude and freudenschade, it reeks of it.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.1.1  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Hallux @3.1    last year

That happens to be hard news.

We can't blame the trucking companies. They see a CDL License and believe it was earned.

I heard last night that officials at the CA DMV can't even ask someone their legal status. Meanwhile these people are driving huge trailer trucks on our highways like suicide bombers. Will Canada take them?

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
3.1.2  Hallux  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.1.1    last year

Did FOX also mention the other 500,000 accidents involving trucks every year that resulted in 5,778 fatalities and 154,993 injuries? Can't do that, not when there's an ax to grind ... eh!

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.1.3  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Hallux @3.1.2    last year

Are you really going to defend putting unqualified drivers behind the wheel of tractor trailers because there are always accidents?

That is an insane argument.

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
3.1.4  Hallux  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.1.3    last year

Are you oblivious to the motivations of your usual sources? Scary stuff!

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
3.1.5  Sean Treacy  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.1.3    last year
you really going to defend putting unqualified drivers behind the wheel of tractor trailers because there are always accidents?

It's the same as the "Americans commit murder, therefore we should be okay with allowing illegals to commit murders that could be prevented by keeping them out of the country. "  It truly is insane.

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
3.1.6  JBB  replied to  Sean Treacy @3.1.5    last year

Yes, and Americans commit murders and assorted felonies all over the world. In your world view nobody should be allowed outside their own borders. Americans have murdered more Americans here in America than all the wars we were ever in.  

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
3.1.7  Sean Treacy  replied to  JBB @3.1.6    last year

That is completly unresponsive and incoherent. For starters, you need to appreciate the difference between legal and illegal immigration. I'm fine with legal immigration. 

rdered more Americans here in America than all the wars we were ever in. 

Again, trying to rationalize letting illegal aliens murder Americans.  Why is ensuring illegals murder Americans such a fundamental issue to the left? Total lack of empathy for Americans whose deaths are preventable. 

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
3.1.8  Nerm_L  replied to  Hallux @3.1.2    last year
Did FOX also mention the other 500,000 accidents involving trucks every year that resulted in 5,778 fatalities and 154,993 injuries? Can't do that, not when there's an ax to grind ... eh!

Watch the video.  This was not just an accident.  They guy drove into vehicles that were stopped.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
3.1.9  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.1.1    last year
We can't blame the trucking companies. They see a CDL License and believe it was earned.

Actually, the trucking companies are culpable in this as well.  FMCSRs require criminal backgrounds to be checked, drug screening and driving history to be checked.  An illegal with an illegal CDL will be quickly identified during this process and these trucking companies should be making the necessary reports to law enforcement.

At the same time California should be issuing CDL's in accordance with the FMCSRs.  

Reality this whole thing starts with the Democrats, California and the trucking companies.  

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
3.1.10  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Hallux @3.1.2    last year
Did FOX also mention the other 500,000 accidents involving trucks every year that resulted in 5,778 fatalities and 154,993 injuries? Can't do that, not when there's an ax to grind ... eh!

Maybe you should do your own article about the accidents instead of trying to deflect.

 
 
 
Gazoo
Masters Silent
3.1.11  Gazoo  replied to  Hallux @3.1.2    last year

That is one helluva lame assed post. The simple fact is that if the drugged up pos illegal hadn’t been given a cdl the crash he caused never would have happened. The three dead Americans would still be alive. Some Americans pay the ultimate price because of liberal policies towards illegals while other liberals act like “so what, there are lots of accidents.” Smfh at the blatant, callous, stupidity.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
3.1.12  CB  replied to  Sean Treacy @3.1.5    last year

No, the problem MAGA has is a lack of authenticity. We won't be manipulated by Right-winger agenda.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.1.13  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Nerm_L @3.1.8    last year

He was on drugs.

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
3.1.14  Nerm_L  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.1.13    last year
He was on drugs.

No doubt.  Sikh's frown on imbibing intoxicating drugs so apparently he was high on American freedom.  This guy was just escaping an oppressive, intolerant society that infringed on his God given right to choose.  Even atheists defend those God given rights.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.1.15  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Nerm_L @3.1.14    last year
Sikh's frown on imbibing intoxicating drugs

Really?

A 21-year-old Indian national, Jashanpreet Singh, has been arrested after allegedly driving a semi-truck while under the influence of drugs and causing a fiery eight-vehicle crash on Interstate 10 in Ontario, Southern California.

Sikh illegal immigrant driver, high on drugs, kills 3 in US truck crash; White House blames California - Connected to India News I Singapore l UAE l UK l USA l NRI

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
3.1.16  Nerm_L  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.1.15    last year
Really?

Yeah, really.  Singh is as Sikh as Trump is American.  They're fakers, frauds, cheats.  Singh wanted to escape Sikh tradition that frowns on imbibing intoxicating drugs.  That's why he is in the United States to escape his own values, traditions, history, and heritage. Jashanpreet Singh wanted the TEA Party freedom that Trump exemplifies.  And America suffers the consequences of both.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
3.2  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Vic Eldred @3    last year

Another illegal alien "asylum seeker" with an illegal CDL from the Shithole State.  3 more deaths and multiple injuries brought to you by the Democrats border policy.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.2.1  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @3.2    last year

I'm told that in California everyone is concerned but nobody speaks about it.

He flattened those cars in front of him like they were pancakes.

I spend a good deal of time on X nowadays. There are rumblings over there.

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
3.2.2  MrFrost  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @3.2    last year
illegal CDL

Proof?

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
3.2.3  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  MrFrost @3.2.2    last year

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
3.3  CB  replied to  Vic Eldred @3    last year

Shit happens! Wait! Does this mean he will be a feature in the mid-term on the right casted as a (among many) "boogeymen"?

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.3.1  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  CB @3.3    last year

Ah, the midterms!

That will be very interesting.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
3.4  CB  replied to  Vic Eldred @3    last year

Sounds like DOT is on the job! Ban of CDLS in this case is appropriate.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.4.1  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  CB @3.4    last year
CDLS

Just let anyone drive those huge trucks?

Out in California they are doing it.  Shhhhh ...don't say anything.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
3.4.2  CB  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.4.1    last year

Too late. . . the 'cat' is out the bag and running down the proverbial street in sight of everybody!

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
3.5  TᵢG  replied to  Vic Eldred @3    last year
Please vote to save yourselves.

This is not about voting.   It is about companies properly vetting their drivers ... their employees in general.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.5.1  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  TᵢG @3.5    last year

Wrong again. It is about licensing:

U.S. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy warned Sunday that he is about make good on a threat to revoke millions in federal funds for California because he says the state is illegally issuing commercial driver’s licenses to noncitizens.

Duffy said Sunday that California has unlawfully issued tens of thousands of these licenses to noncitizens.

“So you have 60,000 people on the roads who shouldn’t have licenses,” Duffy said. “They’re driving fuel tankers, they’re driving school buses, and we have seen some of the crashes on American roadways that come from these people who shouldn’t have these licenses.”

Duffy said earlier this month that he would withhold $40 million from California because it is the only state that is failing to enforce English language requirements for truckers. California defended its practices in a formal response to the Transportation Department, but federal officials were not satisfied.

Transportation secretary says he will pull $160M from California over noncitizen truck licenses

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
3.5.2  TᵢG  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.5.1    last year
Wrong again. It is about licensing:

Not even wrong the first time.   You merely declaring wrong is meaningless.

Employers are ultimately responsible for the people they hire and the positions they have them take on their behalf.   

If an employer hires someone who should not have a license and puts them behind the wheel, they acted irresponsibly.

ChatGPT compilation:

Yes — in most cases, the employer can be held responsible for hiring and allowing an unqualified driver to operate a vehicle on their behalf, even if that driver technically holds a license.

Here’s how that works legally:

1. Negligent Hiring or Retention

If an employer hires a driver who is unqualified, unsafe, or incompetent, and that driver later causes harm, the employer can be liable for negligent hiring or negligent retention.

  • Having a license does not automatically prove competence or qualification.

  • The employer is expected to verify driving records, experience, training, and compliance with all applicable regulations (for example, FMCSA rules for commercial trucking).

  • If the employer knew or should have known the driver was unfit, they are responsible.

2. Vicarious Liability (Respondeat Superior)

Even if the employer did not act negligently in hiring, they can still be vicariously liable for the driver’s actions performed within the scope of employment.

  • This means the company is responsible for damages caused by the driver while performing job duties.

  • This liability applies regardless of the driver’s license status.

3. Regulatory Responsibility

Under federal law (particularly 49 CFR Part 391), motor carriers must ensure every driver:

  • Meets specific qualification standards,

  • Has an appropriate commercial driver’s license (CDL), and

  • Has a clean driving record and medical certification.

If the employer fails to maintain these checks or allows someone to drive without meeting requirements, they can face civil penalties, fines, or lawsuits.


In short:
Yes, the employer is ultimately responsible for ensuring drivers are qualified beyond merely holding a license. If they ignore warning signs or skip due diligence, they can be held liable for any resulting damages.
 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.5.3  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  TᵢG @3.5.2    last year

The US Transportation Secretary begs to differ.

I only hope that the migrant state of California loses funding.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
3.5.4  TᵢG  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.5.3    last year

Why do you take the word of a Trump sycophant as legitimate?

This is not rule of man, Vic, it is rule of law.   Go by the law and documented regulations.    For example:  

§ 391.23 Investigation and inquiries.

( a ) Except as provided in subpart G of this part , each motor carrier shall make the following investigations and inquiries with respect to each driver it employs, other than a person who has been a regularly employed driver of the motor carrier for a continuous period which began before January 1, 1971:

( 1 ) An inquiry, within 30 days of the date the driver's employment begins, to each State where the driver held or holds a motor vehicle operator's license or permit during the preceding 3 years, to obtain that driver's motor vehicle record covering that driver's prior 3-year driving history.

( 2 ) An investigation of the driver's safety performance history with Department of Transportation regulated employers during the preceding three years.

( b ) A copy of the motor vehicle record(s) obtained in response to the inquiry or inquiries to each driver's licensing authority required by paragraph (a)(1) of this section must be placed in the driver qualification file within 30 days of the date the driver's employment begins and be retained in compliance with § 391.51 . If no motor vehicle record is received from a driver's licensing authority required to submit this response, the motor carrier must document a good faith effort to obtain such information. The inquiry to a driver's licensing authority must be made in the form and manner each authority prescribes.

( c )

( 1 ) Replies to the investigations of the driver's safety performance history required by paragraph (a)(2) of this section, or documentation of good faith efforts to obtain the investigation data, must be placed in the driver investigation history file, after October 29, 2004, within 30 days of the date the driver's employment begins. Any period of time required to exercise the driver's due process rights to review the information received, request a previous employer to correct or include a rebuttal, is separate and apart from this 30-day requirement to document investigation of the driver safety performance history data.

( 2 ) The investigation may consist of personal interviews, telephone interviews, letters, or any other method for investigating that the carrier deems appropriate. Each motor carrier must make a written record with respect to each previous employer contacted, or good faith efforts to do so. The record must include the previous employer's name and address, the date the previous employer was contacted, or the attempts made, and the information received about the driver from the previous employer. Failures to contact a previous employer, or of them to provide the required safety performance history information, must be documented. The record must be maintained pursuant to § 391.53 .

( 3 ) Prospective employers should report failures of previous employers to respond to an investigation to the FMCSA and use the complaint procedures specified at § 386.12 of this subchapter . Keep a copy of the reports in the driver investigation history file as part of documenting a good faith effort to obtain the required information.

( 4 ) For drivers with no previous employment experience working for a DOT-regulated employer during the preceding three years, documentation that no investigation was possible must be placed in the driver investigation history file, after October 29, 2004, within the required 30 days of the date the driver's employment begins.

( d ) The prospective motor carrier must investigate, at a minimum, the information listed in this paragraph from all previous employers of the applicant that employed the driver to operate a CMV within the previous three years. The investigation request must contain specific contact information on where the previous motor carrier employers should send the information requested.

( 1 ) General driver identification and employment verification information.

( 2 ) The data elements as specified in § 390.15(b)(1) of this chapter for accidents involving the driver that occurred in the three-year period preceding the date of the employment application.

( i ) Any accidents as defined by § 390.5 of this chapter .

( ii ) Any accidents the previous employer may wish to provide that are retained pursuant to § 390.15(b)(2) , or pursuant to the employer's internal policies for retaining more detailed minor accident information.

( e ) In addition to the investigations required by paragraph (d) of this section, the prospective motor carrier employers must investigate the information listed below in this paragraph from all previous DOT regulated employers that employed the driver within the previous three years from the date of the employment application, in a safety-sensitive function that required alcohol and controlled substance testing specified by 49 CFR part 40 .

( 1 ) Whether, within the previous three years, the driver had violated the alcohol and controlled substances prohibitions under subpart B of part 382 of this chapter , or 49 CFR part 40 .

( 2 ) Whether the driver failed to undertake or complete a rehabilitation program prescribed by a substance abuse professional (SAP) pursuant to § 382.605 of this chapter , or 49 CFR part 40, subpart O . If the previous employer does not know this information ( e.g., an employer that terminated an employee who tested positive on a drug test), the prospective motor carrier must obtain documentation of the driver's successful completion of the SAP's referral directly from the driver.

( 3 ) For a driver who had successfully completed a SAP's rehabilitation referral, and remained in the employ of the referring employer, information on whether the driver had the following testing violations subsequent to completion of a § 382.605 or 49 CFR part 40, subpart O referral:

( i ) Alcohol tests with a result of 0.04 or higher alcohol concentration;

( ii ) Verified positive drug tests;

( iii ) Refusals to be tested (including verified adulterated or substituted drug test results).

( 4 ) As of January 6, 2023, employers subject to § 382.701(a) of this chapter must use the Drug and Alcohol Clearinghouse to comply with the requirements of this section with respect to FMCSA-regulated employers.

( i ) If an applicant who is subject to follow-up testing has not successfully completed all follow-up tests, the employer must request the applicant's follow-up testing plan directly from the previous employer in accordance with § 40.25(b)(5) of this title .

( ii ) If an applicant was subject to an alcohol and controlled substance testing program under the requirements of a DOT mode other than FMCSA, the employer must request alcohol and controlled substances information required under this section directly from those employers regulated by a DOT mode other than FMCSA.

( f )

( 1 ) A prospective motor carrier employer must provide to the previous employer the driver's consent meeting the requirements of § 40.321(b) of this title for the release of the information in paragraph (e) of this section. If the driver refuses to provide this consent, the prospective motor carrier employer must not permit the driver to operate a commercial motor vehicle for that motor carrier.

( 2 ) If a driver refuses to grant consent for the prospective motor carrier employer to query the Drug and Alcohol Clearinghouse in accordance with paragraph (e)(4) of this section, the prospective motor carrier employer must not permit the driver to operate a commercial motor vehicle.

( g ) After October 29, 2004, previous employers must:

( 1 ) Respond to each request for the DOT defined information in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section within 30 days after the request is received. If there is no safety performance history information to report for that driver, previous motor carrier employers are nonetheless required to send a response confirming the non-existence of any such data, including the driver identification information and dates of employment.

( 2 ) Take all precautions reasonably necessary to ensure the accuracy of the records.

( 3 ) Provide specific contact information in case a driver chooses to contact the previous employer regarding correction or rebuttal of the data.

( 4 ) Keep a record of each request and the response for one year, including the date, the party to whom it was released, and a summary identifying what was provided.

( 5 ) Until May 1, 2006, carriers need only provide information for accidents that occurred after April 29, 2003.

( h ) The release of information under this section may take any form that reasonably ensures confidentiality, including letter, facsimile, or e-mail. The previous employer and its agents and insurers must take all precautions reasonably necessary to protect the driver safety performance history records from disclosure to any person not directly involved in forwarding the records, except the previous employer's insurer, except that the previous employer may not provide any alcohol or controlled substances information to the previous employer's insurer.

( i )

( 1 ) The prospective employer must expressly notify drivers with Department of Transportation regulated employment during the preceding three years—via the application form or other written document prior to any hiring decision—that he or she has the following rights regarding the investigative information that will be provided to the prospective employer pursuant to paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section:

( i ) The right to review information provided by previous employers;

( ii ) The right to have errors in the information corrected by the previous employer and for that previous employer to re-send the corrected information to the prospective employer;

( iii ) The right to have a rebuttal statement attached to the alleged erroneous information, if the previous employer and the driver cannot agree on the accuracy of the information.

( 2 ) Drivers who have previous Department of Transportation regulated employment history in the preceding three years, and wish to review previous employer-provided investigative information must submit a written request to the prospective employer, which may be done at any time, including when applying, or as late as 30 days after being employed or being notified of denial of employment. The prospective employer must provide this information to the applicant within five (5) business days of receiving the written request. If the prospective employer has not yet received the requested information from the previous employer(s), then the five-business days deadline will begin when the prospective employer receives the requested safety performance history information. If the driver has not arranged to pick up or receive the requested records within thirty (30) days of the prospective employer making them available, the prospective motor carrier may consider the driver to have waived his/her request to review the records.

( j )

( 1 ) Drivers wishing to request correction of erroneous information in records received pursuant to paragraph (i) of this section must send the request for the correction to the previous employer that provided the records to the prospective employer.

( 2 ) After October 29, 2004, the previous employer must either correct and forward the information to the prospective motor carrier employer, or notify the driver within 15 days of receiving a driver's request to correct the data that it does not agree to correct the data. If the previous employer corrects and forwards the data as requested, that employer must also retain the corrected information as part of the driver's safety performance history record and provide it to subsequent prospective employers when requests for this information are received. If the previous employer corrects the data and forwards it to the prospective motor carrier employer, there is no need to notify the driver.

( 3 ) Drivers wishing to rebut information in records received pursuant to paragraph (i) of this section must send the rebuttal to the previous employer with instructions to include the rebuttal in that driver's safety performance history.

( 4 ) After October 29, 2004, within five business days of receiving a rebuttal from a driver, the previous employer must:

( i ) Forward a copy of the rebuttal to the prospective motor carrier employer;

( ii ) Append the rebuttal to the driver's information in the carrier's appropriate file, to be included as part of the response for any subsequent investigating prospective employers for the duration of the three-year data retention requirement.

( 5 ) The driver may submit a rebuttal initially without a request for correction, or subsequent to a request for correction.

( 6 ) The driver may report failures of previous employers to correct information or include the driver's rebuttal as part of the safety performance information, to the FMCSA following procedures specified at § 386.12 .

( k )

( 1 ) The prospective motor carrier employer must use the information described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section only as part of deciding whether to hire the driver.

( 2 ) The prospective motor carrier employer, its agents and insurers must take all precautions reasonably necessary to protect the records from disclosure to any person not directly involved in deciding whether to hire the driver. The prospective motor carrier employer may not provide any alcohol or controlled substances information to the prospective motor carrier employer's insurer.

( l )

( 1 ) No action or proceeding for defamation, invasion of privacy, or interference with a contract that is based on the furnishing or use of information in accordance with this section may be brought against—

( i ) A motor carrier investigating the information, described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, of an individual under consideration for employment as a commercial motor vehicle driver,

( ii ) A person who has provided such information; or

( iii ) The agents or insurers of a person described in paragraph (l)(1)(i) or (ii) of this section, except insurers are not granted a limitation on liability for any alcohol and controlled substance information.

( 2 ) The protections in paragraph (l)(1) of this section do not apply to persons who knowingly furnish false information, or who are not in compliance with the procedures specified for these investigations.

( m )

( 1 ) The motor carrier must obtain an original or copy of the medical examiner's certificate issued in accordance with § 391.43 , and any medical variance on which the certification is based, and, beginning on or after May 21, 2014, verify the driver was certified by a medical examiner listed on the National Registry of Certified Medical Examiners as of the date of issuance of the medical examiner's certificate, and place the records in the driver qualification file, before allowing the driver to operate a CMV.

( 2 ) For drivers required to have a commercial driver's license under part 383 of this chapter , beginning January 30, 2015, using the CDLIS motor vehicle record obtained from the current licensing State, the motor carrier must verify and document in the driver qualification file the following information before allowing the driver to operate a CMV:

( i ) The type of operation the driver self-certified that he or she will perform in accordance with § 383.71(b)(1) of this chapter .

( ii )

( A ) Beginning on May 21, 2014, and through June 22, 2025, that the driver was certified by a medical examiner listed on the National Registry of Certified Medical Examiners as of the date of medical examiner's certificate issuance.

( B ) If the driver has certified under paragraph (m)(2)(i)(A) of this section that he or she expects to operate in interstate commerce, that the driver has a valid medical examiner's certificate and any required medical variances.

( iii ) Beginning on January 30, 2015, and through June 22, 2025, if the driver provided the motor carrier with a copy of the current medical examiner's certificate that was submitted to the State in accordance with § 383.73(b)(5) of this chapter , the motor carrier may use a copy of that medical examiner's certificate as proof of the driver's medical certification for up to 15 days after the date it was issued.

( 3 ) For drivers required to have a commercial learner's permit under part 383 of this chapter :

( i ) Beginning July 8, 2015, using the CDLIS motor vehicle record obtained from the current licensing State, the motor carrier must verify and document in the driver qualification file the following information before allowing the driver to operate a CMV:

( A ) The type of operation the driver self-certified that he or she will perform in accordance with § 383.71(b)(1) and (g) of this chapter .

( B )

( 1 ) Through June 22, 2025, that the driver was certified by a medical examiner listed on the National Registry of Certified Medical Examiners as of the date of medical examiner's certificate issuance.

( 2 ) If the driver has a commercial learner's permit and has certified under paragraph (m)(3)(i)(A) of this section that he or she expects to operate in interstate commerce, that the driver has a valid medical examiner's certificate and any required medical variances.

( C ) Through June 22, 2025, if the driver provided the motor carrier with a copy of the current medical examiner's certificate that was submitted to the State in accordance with § 383.73(a)(2)(vii) of this chapter , the motor carrier may use a copy of that medical examiner's certificate as proof of the driver's medical certification for up to 15 days after the date it was issued.

( ii ) Until July 8, 2015, if a driver operating in non-excepted, interstate commerce has no medical certification status information on the CDLIS MVR obtained from the current State driver licensing agency, the employing motor carrier may accept a medical examiner's certificate issued to that driver, and place a copy of it in the driver qualification file before allowing the driver to operate a CMV in interstate commerce.

( 4 ) In the event of a conflict between the medical certification information provided electronically by FMCSA and a paper copy of the medical examiner's certificate, the medical certification information provided electronically by FMCSA shall control.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 2126-0004)

[ 35 FR 6460 , Apr. 22, 1970]

The rule of law vs rule of a man used to be a core principle of conservatism.     It remains a fundamental tenet of the CotUS.   Do you support ignoring the CotUS when it comes to partisan beliefs?   ( rhetorical question at this point )

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.5.5  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  TᵢG @3.5.4    last year

It is really common sense TiG:

"The Federal CDL requirements apply to all states within the US – before you even apply for your CDL, you will have to secure a CLP – commercial learner’s permit – which will grant you the opportunity to begin training.  

Asides from the Federal CDL requirements applicable to all of America, there are also a number of other requirements that differ depending on the state:

Minimum Requirement to Apply for a Commercial Learner’s Permit (CLP) or a Commercial Driver’s License (CDL)

  • Have a valid driver’s license ( regular, non-commercial) and be at least 18 years of age (this applies in most states)
  • Be at least 21 years of age:
    • To drive interstate – operate a commercial vehicle across state lines
    • To drive a commercial vehicle containing any hazardous substances or materials
  • Hold one or two years, at the least, of driving experience – may vary with states
  • Applicants must be able to provide proof of US citizenship or legal permanent residency as per 49 CFR 383.71. Proof includes:
    • Presenting a social security card, or evidence of the number 
    • A green card or birth certificate
  • Be successful and pass all background screening checks
  • Applicants must readily provide all names of states where they have been licensed to operate any type of motor vehicle within the past ten years
  • Hold no active or current license suspensions or seizures in any US state
  • Once the CDL is earned, an applicant’s regular state driver’s license must be handed over
  • The applicant is permitted to certify that they are not “subject to any disqualification” on the complete list of disqualifications listed under FMSCA 383.51
  • They must also confirm that they have incurred no disqualification under state law, and they hold no more than one drivers’ license from just one state or jurisdiction
  • Must be fluent in English with a good grasp of both speaking and reading – exams will also be given in English.

New Federal CDL Requirements

The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMSCA) has made plenty of changes in recent years with regards to compliance requirements.

The FMSCA is in place to monitor and assess the safety of road use within the commercial trucking industry, and so many changes are often made to minimize risk to drivers and other road users.

Here are a few recent changes:

  • 1986 saw the introduction of the Commercial Motor Vehicle Safety Act, which prohibited drivers from holding a CDL in more than one state. This was implemented to put a stop to drivers obtaining multiple licenses in a bid to obscure any bad records from a previous state
  • There are new Hazardous Materials Endorsement Requirements to be earned
  • As of 2013, all states began to enforce the texting prohibition 
  • Commercial drivers, as of 2014, have had to begin self-certifying their medical information. They are also only permitted to work with “authorized” medical practitioners listed on the National Medical Registry.

For more information on these changes, you can read on the  FMSCA website .

Medical and Physical Requirements

Different types of driving jobs require different levels of physical capability, but overall, a driver must be physically able to operate a commercial motor vehicle and display an ability to keep up with other non-trucking duties.

The role requires long periods of time spent driving and will often result in a driver developing irregular sleeping patterns and will severely restrict their schedule – this in itself could cause a great deal of work-related stress.

Certain aspects of the job will also require that the driver partake in heavy lifting while loading or unloading the vehicle – this involves a great deal of physical activity and will require a certain level of fitness.

To become a truck driver, you must hold a valid DOT card (a Medical Examiners Certificate) or at the very least, a valid photographic copy of it.

This document is one of the Federal requirements of holding a CDL or CLP as it certifies that you have met and satisfied all mental and physical standards required for the role of operating a commercial motor vehicle.

You must always have this document (or a photocopy) on your person.

CDL Self Certification

As previously noted, a regulation was implemented in 2014 whereby all commercial drivers must self-certify their medical information and may only use medical practitioners who are listed on the NMR (National Medical Registry)

All truck drivers are now permitted to self-certify the kind of vehicle they will be operating from the following categories:

  • Non-Excepted Interstate: This requires that you fulfill the Federal DOT medical card criteria and operate across state lines
  • Excepted Interstate: You are not required to fulfill the Federal DOT medical card requirements and operate across state lines
  • Non-Excepted Intrastate: The Federal DOT medical card requirements must be met and you will only operate in and around your own home state
  • Excepted Intrastate: You will not need to meet the Federal DOT medical card criteria and operate in your home state only

Basic Physical Qualifications for Commercial Drivers

Medical examiners test fitness for the role using an FMSCA form known as the Medical Examination Report for Commercial Driver Fitness Determination.

This form is indicative of the kind of medical qualifications required for commercial drivers.

Regulations now require that you obtain a Medical Examiners Certificate that will serve as proof of your physical and mental capability to operate a commercial motor vehicle.

A list of certain medical requirements is to follow:

  • Standard: Driver must have at least 20/40 Snellen (acuity) in each eye – this can be with a correction or without. Must have at least 70 degrees peripheral vision in each eye. Drivers who use glasses or contact lenses are permitted to practice, but the Medical Examiners Certificate should make note of any use of corrective lenses.
  • An insulin-dependent (via needle) diabetic would not be licensed (with the exception of certain cases)
  • Hearing: Must be able to hear a forced whisper from over a 5ft range without any use of a hearing aid or have an average level of hearing loss in the better ear
  • Blood Pressure: Must have no current diagnosis of any blood pressure related issues that are likely to disrupt and hinder their ability to drive a truck safely
  • Elevated Blood Sugar Levels: Levels of 200 and above are considered to be in the ‘dangerous’ range. However, despite numerous reports on the internet that state a blood sugar level of 200 or more is grounds for disqualification, there does not seem to be any evidence to support this.
  • Conditions such as sleep apnea might be a reason for disqualification

Written and Knowledge Exams

It is vital that you pass your knowledge and skills tests if you want to obtain your CDL.

There’s a CDL manual that can be studied prior to an exam, but it should not be used for the purpose of replacing a formal training program – it is more a complementary study alongside your training.

Formal training actually happens to be one of the best ways to learn the requirements of the role – there are many specialized skills that a truck driver requires, these can be learned in training and implemented on the job from the moment you start.

A general knowledge test must also be sat and passed by an applicant.

Skill and Road Testing

When sitting your road and skills test, you are required to use the same class of commercial vehicle that you are aiming to be licensed for.

The driving test is divided into three sections consisting of:

  • Pre-Trip Vehicle Inspection: The lesson in this is that you must be confident and sure that your vehicle is safe to operate. The CDL Manual has sections 11,12 and 13 to outline what you need to inspect and why
  • Basic Vehicle Control: This section is designed to test you on your control of the vehicle and will require you to maneuver backward and forwards within a marked zone
  • On-Road Driving Exam: This section will be testing your ability to operate the vehicle safely in various different traffic environments including railroad crossings, curved roads, and emergency stops

Military Waiver

The CDL has a slightly different approach with ex-military commercial drivers and grants them a waiver whereby they are allowed to bypass the skills test.

This waiver is only applicable to military drivers who submit the waiver form within one year of their separation from duty.

The waiver may be used by any service members – former or current – who are already licensed to operate a commercial motor vehicle (or the military equivalent) and are currently, or have in the past 90 days, been employed as the driver of this military equivalent.

Although the skills test can be waived, the knowledge test is mandatory.

The use of School Bus or Passenger endorsements under this waiver is strictly forbidden.

CDL Licence Requirements: Federal & State (2025 Updated)


Clearly California simply gave out CDL licenses to illegals in violation of Federal CDL rules.

It's called Critical Thinking.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
3.5.6  TᵢG  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.5.5    last year
It is really common sense TiG:

Yeah, Vic, it is.   In my post, it is quite clear that employers are responsible for vetting their drivers.   You claim to like facts, well demonstrate that.

It's called Critical Thinking.

This is so obvious, even those who do not think critically should recognize that employers are responsible for vetting their drivers.

So, even when everyone else fails and an irresponsible person is given a license, it is still the employer's responsibility to conduct proper due diligence to catch these mistakes before they put an irresponsible person behind the wheel.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.5.7  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  TᵢG @3.5.6    last year

No, Tig, it's not.

The difference between a company depending on a CDL license meaning a driver is qualified and a radical governor making such licenses readily available to illegal migrants who can't speak the language or even read basic traffic signs is glaring. 

You need not post liability clauses to gaslight people. Even the fake critical thinkers who ignore facts and refuse to answer questions know who is to blame.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
3.5.8  TᵢG  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.5.7    last year

The difference is irrelevant.

The company hiring and deploying a driver is responsible for ensuring the driver is safe and responsible.   They are responsible for due diligence because there is no guarantee that a driver's license means the driver is suitable for the job they assign him.

You cannot get around that fact.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.5.9  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  TᵢG @3.5.8    last year
there is no guarantee that a driver's license means the driver is suitable for the job they assign him.

Ah, there was such a time before the radical left came to power that a CDL license meant a driver was completely qualified.[✘]


 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
3.5.10  TᵢG  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.5.9    last year
... radical left ...

More emotional blindly partisan rhetoric.   

Ah, there was such a time before the radical left came to power that a CDL license meant a driver was completely qualified.

You are deflecting.   The employer is responsible for vetting their drivers.   That is the only possible way this can work.   Part of the vetting is to ensure they are properly licensed.   If the licensing system is degraded, that means the employer should take up the slack.

The employer is the one putting the person behind the wheel and taking the risk that the driver might screw up.  No matter how good or bad the standards, tests, etc. the employer is the one who has to ensure they have responsible, competent drivers.

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
4  Nerm_L    last year

MAGA is done.  There isn't any MAGA any longer.  Trump has turned MAGA into a rebranded TEA Party.  The TEA Party is anti-American.  That's what the fake MAGA leaders are doing; selling out and destroying America.  J.D. Vance ain't got the balls to be MAGA.  But any cheating scumbag can be TEA Party.

Trump has tossed his trade policy under the bus by forming a reciprocal trade agreement with Australia for rare earth minerals.  The tariffs don't mean anything any longer; Trump should just cave to China.  At least China would open mines and mineral processors in the United States.  Donald Trump sure as hell won't.  (Who the hell gives money to another country to develop gallium production?  The New York financial geniuses shut down gallium production in the US 30 years ago because of global over supply.)  Trump is just another TEA Party trade idiot because he thinks changing supplier fixes the the supply chain vulnerability.  What a rube.

NATO has not put a collar on Trump and is leading Trump around like a Democrat.  All because Trump wants a worthless Nobel Prize.  Trumps going to be raiding FICA taxes to buy the lipstick Zelensky is suppose to use to kiss Trump's ass.  That's what the TEA Party does, raid Social Security to hide their own graft.  

Trump has returned to the same old TEA Party demands to sell out America.  MAGA wouldn't tear down American history and heritage to build a Golden Pussy Palace.  But the TEA Party would do that in a heartbeat.  The TEA Party would sell their mother's left testicle.  (Yeah, the TEA Party really is that crooked.)

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4.1  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Nerm_L @4    last year

[deleted][✘]

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
4.1.1  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.1    last year

Nerm may be exiting the dark side.  I'm sure he will walk to his own drummer though. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4.1.2  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @4.1.1    last year

More than one person has expressed concern that his account has been hijacked.

This doesn't seem to be a case of a sudden change of views. Even the language is a bit different.

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
4.1.3  Nerm_L  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.1    last year
Is it really you Nerm?

People are wondering about the account.

I'm done with this bullshit.  Donald Trump turned Erika Kirk's Christian example into a cheap joke.  Donald Trump is just another fat assed TEA Party liar.  Republicans lie.  Republicans have been liars since Ronald Reagan turned the GOP into a party of old Democrat Blue Dogs.  Hillary Clinton is more Republican than most Republicans; she's a bigger liar than Trump.  Republican love liars.

MAGA is just another fucking Republican lie.  Think about this.  If the people shut down the government, it's an insurrection and they'll be sent to prison.  Elected officials shut down government because they put party before people and expect to be rewarded at the next election.  Is that MAGA?  Or is that TEA Party?

The people who are not doing any work get paid while those who we depend upon to work are not getting paid.  Is that MAGA?  Or is that TEA Party?

Donald Trump destroyed an important part of our American history and heritage and no one lifted a finger.  Democrats didn't do anything, Republicans didn't do anything.  Goddammed Mike Johnson is trying to cover Trump's lying fat ass.  Does that make Johnson a bigger liar then Trump?  That's not MAGA, that's TEA Party.

There is enough open space on the White House grounds to accommodate 10 or more of Trump's Golden Pussy Palaces.  Why did Trump deliberately destroy a portion of the White House that is the legacy of our First Ladies since World War II?  That's not MAGA, that's TEA Party.  And Trump will very likely skip town before the Golden Pussy Palace is completed because Trump is TEA Party.

Where was fucking J.D. Vance if he's got the balls to be MAGA?  Will J.D. Vance place America before loyalty to TEA Party Trump?  Hell no!  Vance will be on his knees kissing Trump's ass the first chance that's available.

Trump is not MAGA.  Trump is TEA Party.  Trump has always been TEA Party.  Trump is just another Republican liar.  Trump has thrown all the MAGA ideas on the trash heap.  

You know, I've been lectured about change and accepting progress to cover Trump's lying ass about destroying the East Wing.  These same lecturers are up in arms over immigration, DEI, secular government because it threatens American traditions, heritage, and culture.  So, which one is the lie?  Accept progress?  Or defend values and traditions?  Both can only be true to fucking TEA Party liars.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
4.1.4  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.1.2    last year
More than one person has expressed concern that his account has been hijacked.

Maybe he will sue you. 

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
4.1.5  Hallux  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.1.2    last year
More than one person has expressed concern that his account has been hijacked.

Stop casting aspersions, the only person you need to ask is Nerm.

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
4.1.6  Nerm_L  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.1.2    last year
More than one person has expressed concern that his account has been hijacked.This doesn't seem to be a case of a sudden change of views. Even the language is a bit different.

My account is fine.  I've been betrayed.  Fuck Trump.

I was a lifelong Democrat (albeit conservative) until the party played dirty tricks to put Hillary Clinton on the ticket.  That was a betrayal by the Democratic Party.  I supported Bernie Sanders (the decrepit dimwit) because I thought he had enough support to break the Democratic Party.  And he did.

Back on the real Newsvine I was no friend to the TEA Party, or ParTEA as I called them.  ParTEA lying meat sacks would be more appropriate.   Tea Baggers is far too polite to describe ParTEA lying meat sacks.

I was never a fan of Sarah "Spread 'em if you got 'em" Palin, Glenn "Blue Pill" Beck, or Michele "Handjob" Bachmann.  Rand Paul makes Bernie Sanders look good.

Donald Trump is just another ParTEA lying meat sack.  Have you ever wondered why Trump doesn't have dog?  Most Presidents have some sort of pet.  But not Trump.  Why is that?

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
4.1.7  Hallux  replied to  Nerm_L @4.1.6    last year

I sense the last proverbial straw was the desecration of the People's House both inside and outside.

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
4.1.8  Nerm_L  replied to  Hallux @4.1.7    last year
I sense the last proverbial straw was the desecration of the People's House both inside and outside.

Claiming to defend American values and traditions then turning around and destroying those American traditions and values in the name of progress proves that Trump has been lying all along.

People who oppose immigration, DEI, and social liberalism while defending destruction of the White House are not hypocrites.  They're imbeciles.  They are brainless lying meat sacks who only take up space and waste air.  That's not MAGA, that's TEA Party.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
4.1.9  JohnRussell  replied to  Nerm_L @4.1.8    last year
Claiming to defend American values and traditions then turning around and destroying those American traditions and values

I seriously doubt if Trump could pass an 8th grade US history test. 

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
4.1.10  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  JohnRussell @4.1.9    last year

He couldn’t pass a fifth grade geography test.  Remember when he congratulated the great state of Kansas on the Chiefs Super Bowl victory?

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
4.1.11  TᵢG  replied to  Nerm_L @4.1.6    last year
I've been betrayed.  Fuck Trump.

Indeed.

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
5  Right Down the Center    last year

Personally I would like a bit more definition to what MAGA is.  It seems to mean everything from advent Trump supporters to republicans in general.  I hope the Republicans have a little more stability in the future than they seem to now and move more to the center than they are.  Then again I hope the same thing for the Democrats but it doesn't look good for them either IMO.

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
5.1  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Right Down the Center @5    last year
Personally I would like a bit more definition to what MAGA is.

I believe MAGA to define those who defend and deflect for Trump regardless of what they know he's done. They come up with excuses to defend his every action no matter how egregious. A Republican might have voted for Trump but is also willing to disagree with some of his actions or conduct. If you are the least bit critical of Trump, you're not MAGA.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
5.1.1  CB  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @5.1    last year

MAGA is Trump. All its supporters are 'cast-members.' (Whatever Trump is doing is what MAGA is.)

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
5.2  devangelical  replied to  Right Down the Center @5    last year

[deleted][✘]

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
6  Jack_TX    last year

The pendulum swings.  It swung too far left, and it will eventually swing too far to the right.

The MAGA movement is like any other.  It will exist as long as the frustration fueling it still exists, and no longer.

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
6.1  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Jack_TX @6    last year
It will exist as long as the frustration fueling it still exists, and no longer.

Well, I believe the fuel is a self-perpetuating anti-education anti-science problem where the frustration is created because some groups choose to celebrate ignorance and fear knowledge which keeps them at the bottom of society, bitter and angry, dripping with resentment and jealousy towards those at the top. And what makes them even more bitter is the fact that those above them in society often don't look like they do, don't worship the same God, haven't given up the same vices, and haven't suffered for their faith as those rightwing conservative Christians believe they have. Their frustration is born of jealousy as they've been watching others who do whatever they want, living in "sin", never going to church or worse, claiming God doesn't even exist, being rewarded by this society and it's infuriating for conservative Christians.

It's like if you lived in an almost all-Catholic town and the priest asked everyone to give up beer, not just for lent, but for a year. How the Catholics who smile and say "Of course, our faith is strong, we shall give up beer for a year!" feel after a few months watching the Protestants in town enjoying themselves at the singular Protestant pub in town. How the frustration turns into resentment, builds, deepens, and eventually turns into pure hate. Which is where we find ourselves in America today. Those on the left want society to be open so they can live free how they wish, the lgtbq community get to live and marry and use public restrooms in peace, the "drink beer" of my parable. And the conservatives can choose not to get abortions, not get gay married and not live as the liberals, not "drink beer" as it were, all they want. But that's not good enough for rightwing conservative Christians in America, no. They need to force their beliefs on everyone around them so that they don't feel so left out apparently. In terms of my parable, they want to force everyone to take the oath to give up beer because they just can't stand to see others getting to do things they're not allowed to without consequence.

So, sadly, the self-perpetuating conservative frustration fuel will never run out.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
6.1.1  CB  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @6.1    last year

That comment is touching on the source of the problem between liberals and conservatives; the Compelling. Conservatives watch us; so they can accuse us. . .and somehow (I know why) it works. Because, unsuspecting citizens want to cautious and take life slow. . . and here are these allegedly informed Ideologues on the Right playing to their fear of the Unknown. . . and possibly Unknowable. 

Time to call it what it appears to be so long now that it is: Conservatives are trapped by their ideology to not change. . . and so they won't/can't budge. Now then, that smacks of something. . . narrowmindedness. Such individuals, and groups, are STUCK and interestingly have learned how to defend/apologize being stuck.

There is a 'turn' in discussion that you are making, DP. It is the effort to go deeper into the 'ocean' of the problem between liberals and conservatives that for whatever reason-conservatives do not accept the challenge of 'mixing it up' with when confronted. They simply throw out their 'status quo' talking points and then 'run' —until the topic peters out or simply runs its course of shallowness.

As of this moment, I have much more to say and may have to join YOU in saying it/building it/deepening it. I won't let you do it alone.

Still, my thoughts do not 'fully' attend me at this setting on the matter. More to come, for sure.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
6.1.2  CB  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @6.1    last year

I find it perplexing that the party that alleges aspirations of being the freest country in the world (as befits it preeminence) can want a King which is the opposite of freedom. That is,  a Master-servant relationship.

On that relationship. It begs the question. . . a master-servant relationship, like a distance between two ends points, is the shortest distance to getting anything done politically. As it cuts out all 'stops and detours' (Congress in this case) in-between.

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
6.1.3  Jack_TX  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @6.1    last year
Well, I believe the fuel is a self-perpetuating anti-education anti-science problem where the frustration is created because some groups choose to celebrate ignorance and fear knowledge which keeps them at the bottom of society, bitter and angry, dripping with resentment and jealousy towards those at the top.

You've just described the stereotype of woke people.  Especially young woke people.

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
6.1.4  Jack_TX  replied to  CB @6.1.2    last year
I find it perplexing that the party that alleges aspirations of being the freest country in the world (as befits it preeminence) can want a King which is the opposite of freedom.

You've made that up completely.  That might be why it's perplexing.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
6.1.5  CB  replied to  Jack_TX @6.1.4    last year

Is Trump steering the republican party or is the republican party steering him? I would like an answer this time to the question without ambiguity, obfuscation, redirection, or dismissal!

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
6.1.6  Jack_TX  replied to  CB @6.1.5    last year

Angry working class voters are steering Trump.

The Republican Party is simply trying to keep from getting trampled.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
6.1.7  CB  replied to  Jack_TX @6.1.6    last year

A lot of good it is doing the angry working class. . . as they keep getting shafted by the 'mendacity' president! Oh wait, Trump is the GOP. So the answer is Trump is driving the GOP! 

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
6.1.8  Jack_TX  replied to  CB @6.1.7    last year
A lot of good it is doing the angry working class

Time will tell. 

as they keep getting shafted by the 'mendacity' president!

Are they?  They seem to be getting what they voted for.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
6.1.9  CB  replied to  Jack_TX @6.1.8    last year

Please. But it's good I guess MAGA supporters can appreciate the mendacity President of their own choosing. The rest of us see the lies for what they are: A lack of integrity and good sense.

Now then, I earnestly pray that God with grant Trump and MAGA supporters a spiritual awakening that permits them to live peacefully with their fellow citizens in this country.

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
6.1.10  Jack_TX  replied to  CB @6.1.9    last year
But it's good I guess MAGA supporters can appreciate the mendacity President of their own choosing.

You like that word, but illegal immigration is down, boys are out of the girls' locker rooms, there is a ceasefire in Gaza, we have a few new trade deals, public institutions are getting out of the DEI business, and he's gone to war against Antifa.  The S&P is up double digits since he took office and gas prices are down about 4% from a year ago.

I realize you will think some of that is terrible, but it's what his supporters voted for.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
6.1.11  CB  replied to  Jack_TX @6.1.10    last year

And yet when his mouth is open he is lying. So lying helps brings about good is the 'argument'?  Perhaps some things would have happened anyway? BTW, DEI as a problem for the country is not a real thing-except for epistemologically ignorant individuals and groups whom do not wish to be properly REPLACED by suitably qualified Others. Thus, giving someone else a chance at prosperity, fair treatment, and a quality life!

I pray God will help wake the spirit within Trump and MAGA supporters to be truthful and decent to let go of the bigotry which causes them to think they are worth more than Others. 

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
6.1.12  Jack_TX  replied to  CB @6.1.11    last year
And yet when his mouth is open he is lying.

It does not seem that they've ever cared about that.  

So lying helps brings about good is the 'argument'?

I don't think they care about the lying.  They seem to know better than to take him literally.

  Perhaps some things would have happened anyway?

I think the market probably would have gone up anyway.  I'm not sure there was much sign of illegal immigration or DEI or trans issues slowing at all.

BTW, DEI as a problem for the country is not a real thing-except for epistemologically ignorant individuals and groups whom do not wish to be properly REPLACED by suitably qualified Others.

If they're better qualified (and many are), they don't need DEI programs.  

Thus, giving someone else a chance at prosperity, fair treatment, and a quality life!

Anyone who needs a DEI program to get a chance at prosperity in this country in this century isn't going to become prosperous no matter what happens.  

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
6.1.13  TᵢG  replied to  Jack_TX @6.1.6    last year
Angry working class voters are steering Trump.

To engage in practices that waste money and raise consumer prices?

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
6.1.14  CB  replied to  Jack_TX @6.1.12    last year
If they're better qualified (and many are), they don't need DEI programs.

So MAGA says. Epistemological ignorant ignores the firings of good hardworking 'Americans' by the Trump Administration's emotional outburst! Seems that nepotism ("Jim and Jill" -Bob) will be coming back to Make America Great Again! /s

And no, nepotism is not a DEI program. . . it's corruption. And it's UNPROFESSIONAL.

 
 
 
igknorantzrulez
Freshman Silent
6.1.15  igknorantzrulez  replied to  Jack_TX @6.1.8    last year
as they keep getting shafted by the 'mendacity' president!
Are they?  They seem to be getting what they voted for.

How can you State this >? Even a mega amount of the maga magots are now realizing they FCKD Up. 

The Supreme Court realizes they FCKD Up.

And it is finally dawning on the Republicans, hey, we enabled someone who has now grown out of control, and we cannot go against him, as we risk being primaried and of course , public ally ridiculed if we go against anything King Donald Ducking and fuckin US A ll over, blatantly

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
6.1.16  Jack_TX  replied to  TᵢG @6.1.13    last year
To engage in practices that waste money and raise consumer prices?

If it supports their ideology, sure.

I don't understand why they should be held to a different standard than liberals, who have done exactly that for decades.

  

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
6.1.17  Jack_TX  replied to  CB @6.1.14    last year

You've stopped making sense. CB.  What are you trying to say?

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
6.1.18  Jack_TX  replied to  igknorantzrulez @6.1.15    last year
How can you State this >?

Because I live in Texas and I talk to them.  

Even a mega amount of the maga magots are now realizing they FCKD Up. 

You're confusing people who happened to vote for Trump because the alternative was completely shite for actual Trump supporters.

And it is finally dawning on the Republicans, hey, we enabled someone who has now grown out of control

"Finally dawning"??  Where the fuck have you been?  Traditional Republicans saw this 10 years ago.  

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
6.1.19  TᵢG  replied to  Jack_TX @6.1.16    last year

It is not about standards but rather rational thought.

It is irrational to support actions that harm you.   And taking a serious hit just to annoy political/ideological opponents is also irrational.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
6.1.20  CB  replied to  Jack_TX @6.1.17    last year

I wrote what I wrote. Deal with it or not. Now, I am moving on. . . .

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
6.1.21  Jack_TX  replied to  TᵢG @6.1.19    last year
It is not about standards but rather rational thought.

That still doesn't explain the double standard.

It is irrational to support actions that harm you.   And taking a serious hit just to annoy political/ideological opponents is also irrational.

Yes.  And liberals have done that for decades.

Why are the expectations different?  Are we just admitting that we expect conservatives to be more sane and rational?

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
6.1.22  TᵢG  replied to  Jack_TX @6.1.21    last year
That still doesn't explain the double standard.

I never claimed there was no double standard.   My point had nothing to do with double standards.

My point was and is that it is irrational to support actions that harm you.   And taking a serious hit just to annoy political/ideological opponents is also irrational.

It is not relevant what liberals/conservatives/Ds/Rs/... have done in the past and I do not expect that D human beings are different than R human beings.

Not the point I made.

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
6.1.23  Jack_TX  replied to  TᵢG @6.1.22    last year
My point was and is that it is irrational to support actions that harm you.

OK.   And?  

Let's don't pretend "irrational harmful actions" are not a staple of American life.  It's what we do.

That said, not all the things they support are harmful or irrational.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
6.1.24  TᵢG  replied to  Jack_TX @6.1.23    last year
OK.   And?  

Why do you need me to explain what I wrote?   What part do you think is unclear?

Let's don't pretend ...

More pointless deflection.

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
6.1.25  Jack_TX  replied to  TᵢG @6.1.24    last year

[deleted][✘]

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
7  CB    last year
No, the Republican Party is never going back to Bob Dole, John McCain or Mitt Romney.

Thanks for the warning! So now we know.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
8  CB    last year

I have actually (literally) started praying for God to give Trump a heart for ALL the people of this country and not just for Rightwingers. . . when that heart (of Trump's) is pricked and modified. . . God will be glorified for it. . . as it will be evidence of a change coming over him that is UNDENIABLY due to prayer!  So, prayer 'warriors' pray for Trump's deliverance so it may come swiftly.

 
 

Who is online




84 visitors