╌>

Finally, a conviction

  

Category:  Op/Ed

By:  vic-eldred  •  11 months ago  •  13 comments

Finally, a conviction
Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche cheered the verdict on X, writing: “Today, a federal jury of her peers found her guilty and sent a clear message: the American people respect law and order. Nobody is above the law,” Blanche wrote. “This Department will not tolerate obstruction, will enforce federal immigration law, and will hold criminals to account – even those who wear robes.”

Link to quote: Wisconsin judge Hannah Dugan guilty of obstructing ICE agents after helping illegal migrant evade arrest

We finally broke the ice. A leftist activist has finally been convicted of a criminal act and will be held accountable. It happened in a purple district via a non-partisan jury which simply followed the law.

Wisconsin activist Judge Hannah Dugan was found guilty of felony obstruction in a federal court for blatantly helping an undocumented immigrant evade federal authorities. Back in April Judge Dugan helped illegal alien Eduardo Flores-Ruiz avoid ICE agents who were trying to serve him a warrant. She now faces up to 5 years in prison.

Her equally activist defense team plans to appeal the decision.


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1  author  Vic Eldred    11 months ago

Now other activist judges might think twice about breaking the law they are supposed to enforce.

AA1SEmcQ.img?w=768&h=998&m=6

Out with the trash.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
1.1  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Vic Eldred @1    11 months ago
Now other activist judges might think twice about breaking the law they are supposed to enforce.

The left just needs to remember what they kept screeching..."Nobody is above the law".

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2  JohnRussell    11 months ago

Trump did much worse and still roams among us. 

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
2.1  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  JohnRussell @2    11 months ago

But your SCotUS declared him to be above the law.  

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
2.1.1  Sean Treacy  replied to  Buzz of the Orient @2.1    11 months ago
our SCotUS declared him to be above the law.  

No. They didn't. Repeating a false claim  over and over doesn't make it true. 

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
2.1.2  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  Sean Treacy @2.1.1    11 months ago
ODF.h4NqHtu1TFRmh7-J0hGyzw?w=32&h=32&qlt=90&pcl=fffffa&r=0&o=6&cb=ucfimg1&pid=1.2&ucfimg=1
FindLaw
› legalblogs › federal-courts › ...

SCOTUS Gives Broad Criminal Immunity to Presidents

Jul 1, 2024  · As the Supreme Court put it, " [a]t a minimum, the President must be immune from prosecution for an official act unless the Government can show that applying a criminal prohibition to 

 
 
 
Snuffy
Professor Participates
2.1.3  Snuffy  replied to  Buzz of the Orient @2.1.2    11 months ago

Correct me if I'm wrong, but being immune from prosecution FOR AN OFFICIAL ACT is not the same as being above the law.

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
2.1.4  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  Snuffy @2.1.3    11 months ago

Yes, provided that the "official act" is not a crime, or contrary to law, the Constitution or the Bill of Rights. 

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
2.2  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  JohnRussell @2    11 months ago

Again with the unproven opinions.  

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
3  Sean Treacy    11 months ago

Given the progressives rebellion against enforcing the laws against their own, I'm sorta surprised. 

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
4  Jeremy Retired in NC    11 months ago

Now we need to see these judges held accountable for letting repeat offenders walk the streets.

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
4.1  MrFrost  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @4    11 months ago

Now we need to see these judges held accountable for letting repeat offenders walk the streets.

Signed,

Donald Trump, 34 time convicted felon. 

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
4.1.1  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  MrFrost @4.1    11 months ago

At least be factual. 

  1. He had nothing to do with this conviction.
  2. The "conviction" you are talking about, was a misdemeanor past it's statute of limitations.  
 
 

Who is online








80 visitors